ML20096F426
| ML20096F426 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200004 |
| Issue date: | 11/15/1995 |
| From: | Fortin A GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20096F375 | List: |
| References | |
| 25A5764, NUDOCS 9601230382 | |
| Download: ML20096F426 (29) | |
Text
1 3*.
o GE%&rW 73 764 S" No I EISIDENT: SBWR PANDA REVISION STATUS SHEET DOCUMENTTITLE l'ANDA TEST PLAN. TESTS MS, MSA, MSB, M4, M7 IIGEND OR DESCR1PTION OF GRotiPS TYPE:
SPECIFICATION FMF:
SBWR I
MPL NO:
T10 5010 l -DENOTES CilANGE i
TillSITEM IS OR CONTAINS ASAFE1Y-RELATEDITEM YES @ NO O EQUIP CLASS CODE C REVISION l C A l RM-02800 8/I4/95 11 J.E. TORilECK 9/12/95 RJA RM-02925 i
1 J. E. TORDECK 9/18/95 RJA RM-02950 2
A. FORTIN 10/10/95 RJA 1
CN03219 i
GENERAI. DOCUMENT Cl!ANGr A.FORTIN g 15 M 3
RJA CNO3350 GENERAL.DOCUMI'.NT Cil ANGE i
PRINTS TO i
MADEBY APPROVAI.S GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY G.A. WINGATE 8/l1/95 G.A. WINGATE 8/11/95 175 CURTNER AVENUE SANJOSE CAI.1FORNIA 25125
_Cl!KD BY:
ISSUED R. SUCCS 2/11/95 R. A1!MANN 8/14/95 CONT ON SHEET 2 MS WORI', (3/28/94)
DISK-25A5764 FTC L
9601250382 960117 PDR ADOCK 05200004 1
A PDR
ie o.
4 9
25A5764 sH NO.2 3
GENucasarEnergy "S
TABLE OF COhTTENTS
- 1. SCOPE..
S
- 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS.....
.S S. TEST OBJECTIVES...........
4
- 4. TEST FACILITY CONFIGURATION -....
............- 5
- 5. CONTROL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
.................. 12 5.1 RIT H EATE RPO WE.R CO NTRO L....
......................................................................... 12 5.2 DRYWEl.1/WE^1 VELA.VACU UMBREAKERCONTROL............................................................12
- 6. REQUIRED MEASUREMEf$I5
.........13
- 7. DNTA RECORDING, PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS...................
......19 7.1 D ATA RE CO RD I N C....................................................................................... 19 7.4 D ATA PRO CES S I N C AND4 N A LYSI S..................................................................................... ] 9
- 8. SHAKEDOWN TESTS......
.......... 21 8.1 PURPOSE...............................................................................
..................,21
\\
8.2 DESCRIPTION
..........................................................................................................21
- 9. TEST afATRDL......................
...................................................... 2 2 9.1 TEST D E SCRI PTl O N...........................................................................................22
, 9.2 TESTACCEPTANCICRITERI A.............
.........................................................26 i 0.
On n
4
..........................................................................................,.,/
1 1. TEST H OLD/DECISI ON. 1". +~% TS............................
2 8 I
S<
25A5764 sH No. 3 gg arv. 3
- 1. SCOPE This test plan defines the detailed requirements, beyond those already identified in GE Spec 25A5587, for the PANDA transient integral system tests MS,MSA, MSB, M4 and M7. This Test Plan specifically covers the test program objectiw:s, the experimental facility configuration, the test facility control, the test instrumentation, the data acquisition, processing and analysis. the test initial and boundary conditions and the test reports for tests MS, MSA, MSB, M4, & M7.
This test plan is applicable to the SBWR Design Certification project only.
1 a
- 2. APPI.1CABII DOCUMENTS t
- a. PANDA Test Specification, GE Spec 25A5587.
This document provides the general speciGcation of requiremen': for tests in the PANDA facility to support SBWR Dciiign Certification.
- b. PANDA SteadyState Tests -
PCC Performance Test Plan & Procedure, PSI Doc. TM-42-94-11/A1.PHA 410.
This document provides a general description of the PANDA test facilityand the specific plan and procedure for steadystate tests of the PCC condenser performance.
- c. PANDA Test Procedures for MS & M4. PSI Doc.
ALPHA-520.
This document provides the implementing procedures for establishing the PANDA test facility initial and boundary conditions and the specific procedure for initiating the transient integral splem tests for MS & M4.
- d. PANDA Test Procedure for M7, PSI Doc. AI.PHA-521.
This document provides the implementing procedures for establishing the PANDA test facility initial and boundary conditions and the specific procedure for initiating the transient integral systcm test M7.
- c. PANDA PROJECT CONTROL PIAN, CE Doc.
PPCP-QkO1.
This document describes the organi7ation, quality related activitics, events and procedures necer,sary to ensure and verify that the PANDA project at PSI is conducted under the provisions of the GE SBWR Quality Assurance Plan as described in NEDG-31831.
1 i
1 a,
1 6
25A5764 su so.4 gg arv. 3 k TESTOBECTJyff The objectives of the PANDA integral systems tests are to provide additional data to: (a) provide a sufficient database to confirm the capability ofTRACG to predict SBWR containment system performance, including potential systems interaction effects. (IntegelSystems Tats)and (b) Demonstrate startup and long-term operation of a passiw containment cooling system.
(ConceptDemonstation).
The specific objectives and approach for the tests covered by this test plan are:
a) Conduct tests (MS, MSA, MSB and M4) with nominal post-LOCA conditions to establish the base case and demonstra:e transient system response and repeatability.
b) Perform test M7 with drywell and PCC units initially filled with air to provide data to determine the PCC condenser start-up characteristics when blanketed with noncondensabic gIS*
e f
1 i
l 4
- I l
O' 25A5764 sH No. 5 GE h h %
av 3
- 4. TEST FACIIJIYCONFIGURATION 1
The PANDA test facilityis described in detailin Section 3 of PSI report ALPHA 410. For Tests MS,MSA, MSB, M4 and M7 the PANDA facility will be configured to simulate the SBWR post-I.OCA configuration as follows:
- 1) Table 4.1 identifies the key PANDA facility geometry and efTective flow area ( A /8) characteristics. In Tabic 4.1, the required tolerance for the PANDA as-built value relative to the corresponding SBWR scaled value is tabulated for each of these key characteristics. In addition, the required accuracy for the as-built value for each of the key characteristics is tabulated in Table 4.1. The actual as-built accuracy should be approximately equal to or less than the required accuracy tabulated in Tabic 4.1. The actual as-built accuracies depend on the source of the as-built value. These sources can be measurements by PSI or Electorwatt (i.e.
i line losses, line lengths, elevations), manufacturer's specifications or design standards (i.e.,
PCC/1C tubes), or calculations from as-built dimensions (i.e., vessel volumes, losses for lines without flow tests).
i
- 2) The RPV will supply steam to each drywell with two steam lines (one to each drywell). These.
two steam lines will have the same pressure loss characteristics.
i
- 3) RPV heater power will bc controlled as followv a) For tes:s MS, MSA, MSll, & M4 RPV heater power will be controlled as a function of time to simulate the scaled decay heat and stored energy release as indicated in Tahics 9.2a &
9.2b.
b) For test M7 RPV beater power will be established and held constant at a value of 1.13 MW
^
- 4) The IC unit will be isolated by closing the inlet and oudet vahrs (i.e., the IC feed, drain and vent will be closed).
- 5) All three PCC units will be lined-up to take feedflow from the drywells, to vent noncondensables and steam into the water volume of the suppression pool, and drain condensate to the GDCS volume.
- 6) The PCC pools and IC pool will be configured as follows:
a) For Test MS the PCC pools will be interconnected at the bottom. During the test, no water will be added or drained from the pools.(note this test has been run based on 25A5764 Rev.1) b) For Test MSA the PCC pools and IC pool will be filled and isolated from cach other.
l During the test, orater will be added to the PCC pools, as needed, from the bottom to maintain level.( note this test has been run based on 25A5764 Rev. 2)
i G<
25A5764 SH NO. 6
{
gg av. S c) For Test MSB the PCC pools and IC pool will be filled and interconnected at the bottom. l During the test, water will be added to the pools via the interconnecting bus line, as needed, from the bottom to maintain level.( note this test has been run based on 25A5764 Rev. 2) d) For Tests M4 the PCC pools and IC pool configuration will be based on an evaluation of the system performance displayed during MS, MSA, MSB. If MS, MSA and MSB results are evaluated as essentially the sarse then MSA or MSB will fulfill the requirements oftest M4 and will be daignated as Test M4. Ifit is determined that test M4 needs to be run, the configuration for the pools will be specified by revision to this Test Plan.
c) For Tests M7 the PCC pools will be filled and irolated from each other. During the test, no water will be added or drained from the pools.
7)
The only direct lines of communication between the drywell and wetwell will be through the vacuum breakers (when the wtwell pressure exceeds drywell pressure sufficiently to open the vacuum breaker) and the main vent lines (which will be submerged within the wetwells).
- 8) The GDCS pressure equalization lines to both drywells will be open.
- 9) The GDCS drain line with check valve will be lined up to return PCC condensate to Ute RPV,
- 10) The Equalizing lines between the RPV and wetwells will be valved out of senice.
4
4 o
+
i d
25A5764 su so.7 gg arv. 3 Table 4.1:
PANDA Tmnsient Integral Systesa Tests KeyFacility Charactedsdes PARAMETER TOTIRANCE FOR PANDA PANDA AS-BUILT ACCURACY AS.BULT VAT 11E RET ATWE TO SSWR SCAED VALUE FOR PANDA i
PCC/fC Hent Exchanger 4
Tubing
-Length 5%
5mm
-Outside 15%
0.S m m Diameter
-Thickness i 15 %
0.2mm PCC/IC Hear Frehanaer Hended
-Outside 15 %
15mm 1
diameter
-Length i5%
15mm
-Stect thickness 15%
0.3 mm cylindrical SCCtion
-Stcct thickness 15 %
10.6 mm end plates
-Distance i5%
5mm betwren headers (drums) i
.o S'
25A5764 su No. 8 GEIUluclearEnergy
"'<. s Table 4.1:
PANDA Transient Integral Systen2 Tests Key Facility Characterhtics(continued)
PARAMETER TOIFRANCE FOR PANDA AS.
PANDA ASBUILT ACCURACY BUILTVALUE REIATIVE TO i
SSWRSCAIIDVALUE FOR PANDA Vessel Volumes
-RPV 10 %
i2%
-Drywc!11 1 10 %
i2%
-Dr)well 2 i 10 %
i2%
-Wetwell 1 10 %
2%
-Wetwell 2 10 %
i2%
CDCS (1) i2%
-IC/PCC pools (2) 12%
. (1)
GDCS pool volume is not scaled to SBWR (2)
IC/PCC pool volumes are not scaled to SBhR
O' 25A5764 ss No. 9 GENuciaarEneryy
=S Table 4.1:
PANDA Transient Integral System Tests Ecy Facility Characteristics (continued)
PARAMETFR TOTFRANCE FOR PANDA PANDA A% BUILT ACCURACY l
AS-BUH T VAllTE REIATIVETO SBWR SCAIFDVALUE FOR PANDA Elevation Differences P1V-P2V-PSV i2cm Icm discharges PIC inlet to outlet 10cm Icm P2Cinlet to outlet 10cm 1cm PSC inlet to outlet i10 cm iIcm P1V,P2V,PSV i5cm i1cm discharges relative to normal suppression pool level
- MV1 and MV2 5cm iIcm discharges relative i
to normal suppression pool l
level i
P1V P2V,PSV i5cm i1cm discharges relative to MV1 and MV2 discharges PIF,P2F,P3F
+ 200 cm/ - 0 i1cm inlet relative to MSI and MS2 discharge l
l i
l
}
G' 25A5764 sH wo.10 gg mzv. S Table 4.1:
PANDA Transient Ink:gral System Tests Key Facilhy Characterisdes (continued)
PARAMETER TOf FRANCE FOR PANDA AS. PANDAAS-BUET BUILT VATITE RFJ ATIVE TO ACCURACY SBWR SCALED VALUE FOR PANDA i
Elevations frclative to l
TAF/ Heaters)
P3F,P2F, PSF.
+ 200 cm/ - 0 i5mm inlet PIC,P2C PSC i5cm d5mm intet P1V,P2V,PSV 15cm i5mm discharge GRTinlet 5cm i5mm GRT outlet i5cm i5mm MV1 outic(
i5cm d5mm
' MV2 outlet 5cm d5mm MS1,1 outlet i5cm 5mm MSI. 2 outlet i5cm i5mm Top of RPV d 25 cm i50mm chimney
.s
. I l
25A5764 SH NO. I1 GEbesturDasayy
- 8 Table 4.1:
PANDA Transient Integral System Tests KeyFacilityCharacteristics (continued)
PARAMETER TOYFRANCE FOR PANDA ASBUILT PANDA ALBUILT VAllERELATIVE TO SBWR ACCURACY SCAIJD VAT TTE FOR PANDA Connectino line j
Flow Remictinces RPV to DW1 20 %
10 %
i10%
DW 1 to PCCI i 20 %
I10%
DW2 to PCC2 i 20 %
i10%
DW 2 to PCCS i 20 %
i 10 %
DW1 to WW 1 (S) i10%
(LOCA vent)
DW 2 to WW 2 (3) i 10 %
(LOCA vent)
PCC) to GDCS i 20 %
i 10 %
PCC2 to GDCS i 20 %
i 10 %
a PCCS to GDCS i 20 %
i 10 %
PCCI to WW I 20 %
i]O%
PCC2 to WW 2 i20%
i 10 %
PCCS to WW 2 20 %
i 10 %
GDCS to RPV 20 %
i 10 %
WW I to DW I 20 %
10 %
i (bypass /vac. brkr)
(S) LOCA vents are not scaled to SilWR
t 1
25A5764 suo.n gg asv. S 5.
CONTROL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION In order to perform the transient integral system tests, several control systems are to be used to l
establish initial and boundary conditions for each test. These control systems will be used to l
manage and regulate the key test parameters prior to the test. Following test initiation, only the RPV heater power and the vacuum breaker controllers will be used. A main control system, which includes the electronic controllers, will be used to perform the operations.
5.1 RPV Heater Power Control The electrical power to the heaters in the RPV will be controlled automatically following test initiation, to match the decay pour and RPV structural heat release specified in Section 9.
5.2 Drywell/Wetwell Vacuum Breaker Control The operation of the vacuum breaker valve will be controlled based on the measured pressure difference between the drywell and wetwell. Drywell pressure is initially established at a value equal to or greater than the wetwell pressure to conform to the post-LOCA condition specified for the beginning of each individual test. During the course ofa test if the drywell to wetwell pressure drops below a minimum value the vacuum breaker valve control will automatically open the valve. The wetwell-to-drywell differential pressure at which the vacuum breaker for Drywell 1 opens will be set at 0.47 psi (3.24 kPa), and the differential pressure at which the vacuum breaker for Drywell I closes will be set at 0.3 psi (2.06 kPa).The opening and closing difTerential pressure for the vacuum breaker in Drywell 2 will be set 0.1 psi higher than the corresponding setpoints for the Drywell I vacuum breaker, i.e. at 0.57 psi (S.9 kPa) and 0.4 psi (2.8 kPa), respectively.
5.3 PCC/IC POOL LEVEL. CONTROI.
The PCC and IC pool level control, when applicable, will be da manual operator action to line-up the auxiliary water system and feed water from the demineralized water supply sptem into the bottom of the pools while monitoring the pool levelindication.
O<
25A5764 s u o.13 ggg-arv. 3 6.
REOUIRFD MEASUREMENTS Table 6.1 gives the measurements required to meet the objectives for Tests MS,MSA, MSB, M4, and M7. With the exception of the temperature indication, no PANDA instrumentadon other than that in Table 6.1 is necessary for the performance of %-ts MS,MSA, MSB, M4, ar'd M7. The sensors identified in Table 6.1 must be operable prior to initiation of these tests. It is acceptab!c if a sensor is not operable,if the backup identified in the second column is operable.
Temperature measurements in the PCCs and the various connected vessels are desirab!c, but not all of these temperature measurements are required for the performance of these tests as discussed below. The temperature measurements required for these tests with an accuracy of 1.5*C are as follows:
RPV steam dome (at least one).
PCC tubes: (It is required that 50% of the tube wall and fluid sensors be available.The available sensors must include at least 40% of the probes above and at least 40% of the probes below tht. horizontal mid-plane of the tube bundle. Within these constraints, the test engineer has responsibilityand authority tojudge whether or not sufUcient PCC temperature sensors 1 ire operable to initiate a test).
PCC pools: 30% of the liquid probes including one of the lowest three elevations.
DW: 50% of the fluid probes including either the lowest elevadon or one thermocouple from de water-surface probc.
WW: 50% of the gas probes,50% of the liquid probes and two out of three of the floadng probes.
GDCS pool: 50% of the fluid probes and one thermocouplc from the floating probe.
1 Vessel walls: 20% of GDCS. DW, and WW.
1 System lines: 50% of the gas and liquid temperature probes in each system line used for i
the test (ifnumber ofsensors is odd, round to lower whole number,i.e. S sensors totalin l
one line means one is required).
In Tab!c 6.1 a subset of the required instruments are identified as " top priority measurennents".
Time history plots of these top priority measurements are to be included in the Test File (see Section 7.S) and the Apparent Test Results (ATR) Report (see Secdon 10). In addition to the top priority measurements identified in Tabic 6.1, there are other top priority measurements. These are: 1) the total electrical power to the heaters in the RPV which is determined during post-test data processing, and 2) some temperature measurements. The top priority temperature measurements are: RPV steam dome temperature measurement, highest and lowest temperaturc measurement location in cach drywell, highest and lowest temperature measurement location in the gas space of each wetwell, highest liquid temperature rncasurement location in each wetwell, and one temperature measurement in the GDCS drain line and in each of the three PCC vent lines.
j i
!l }
b G'
25A5764 su wo.14 GENucinarErmyy
=S As noted in Section 7A, the operator will perform checks as possible to confirm instrumentation performance. These checks will include comparison of redundant measurements. In addition, the oxygen sensors will be checked out prior to transient test MS using the PSI procedure AI.PHA j
502.
4 k
I f
j i
4
6<
25A5764 sH NO.15 ggg arv. 3 Table 6.1:
INSTRUMENTATION REQUIRED
Backup Accuracy Imcadon CB.VBl +
N/A Valve position : Vacuum Breaker Line 1 (On/Of1)
CB.VB2 +
N/A Valve position : Vacuum Breaker Line 2 (On/Off)
MD.MV1 MI.MV1 0.5 kPa pressure diff. meas. Main Vent line DW1-> SCI MD.MV2 MI.MV2 0.5 kPa pressure diff. meas. Main Vent line DW2->SC2 MD.PlF MV.P1F 0.5 kPa pressure diff, meas. PCCI Feed DW1->PCCI MD.PlV.2 MI.PlV.1 0.5 kPa pressure difT. meas. PCCI Vent PCCl-> SCI MD.P2F MV.P2F 0.5 kPa pressure difT. meas. PCC2 Feed DW2->PCC2 MD.P2V.2 MI.P2V.1 0.5 kPa pressure difT. meas. PCC2 Vent PCC2->SC2 MD. PSF MV.P3F 0.5 kPa pressure diff. meas. PCCS Feed DW2->PCCS MD.PSV.2 MI.P3V.1 0.5 kPa pressure difT. meas. PCCS Vent PCCS->SC2 MD.VB1 MD.VB2 0.5 kPa pressure difT. meas. Vacuum Breaker SCl-DW1 MD.VB2 MD.VB1 0.5 kPa pressure diff, meas. Vacuum Breaker SC2-DW2 MI.MV1 MD.MV1 N/A(on/ oft) phase indicator Main Vent line DWl-> SCI M1.MV2 MD.MV2 N/A(on/o!T) phase indicator Main Vent line DW2->SC2 MI.PlV.1 MD.P1V.2 N/A(on/ oft) phaseindicator PCC1 Vent PCCI-> SCI MI.P2V.1 MD.P2V.2 N/A(on/off) phase indicator PCC2 Vent PCC2->SC2 M!.PSV.1 MD.P3V.2 N/A(on/ oft) phase indicator PCCS Vent PCCS->SC2 MP.D14 2.5 kPa absol, pressure meas. Drywell 1/ DW1 MP.RP.1 +
2.5 kPa absol pressure meas. Reactor Pressure Vessel / RPV MP.Sl+
2.5 kPa absol pressure meas. Suppression Chamber 1/ SCI
~
4 i
6' 25A5761 SH NO. I6 G E M k Eiicaynr Table 6.1:
INSTRUMENTATION FIQUIRED* FOR TESTS MS, MSA, MSB, M4, M7 Pseccadd **
Backup Accmscy Imcation MLU1 MLUG or 0.2 mt PCC) poollevel MLU2 or MLUS(o)
MLU2 MLUO or 0.2 mt PCC2 poollevel MLU1 or MLUS(c)
MLUS MLU0 or 0.2 m$
PCCS poollevel MLU2 or ML.UI(o)
MLU0 MLU1 or 0.2 m IC poollevel MLU2 or _
MLUS(o)
MLRP.1 0.2 m RPVlevel MLSI MLS2 0.05 m Suppression pool level MLD1 MLD2 0.05 m Drywell water lewl MPG.D1_1 +
MPG.Dl_2 or 5.00 %
air partial pres. meas. DW1 (highest probe in DWI)
MPG.D1_3 M PG.D1_1 +
5.00 %
air partial pres. meas. Drywell 1 / DW1 (highest probe in DWI)
MPG.Dl_2 MPG.Dl_S 5.00 %
air partial pres. meas. Drywell 1 / DW1 MPG.D2_1 +
MPG.D2_2 or 5.00 %
air partial pres. meas. DW2 (highest probe in DW2)
MPG.D2_S MPG.D2_1 +
5.00 %
air partial pres meas. Drywell 2 / DW2 (highest probein DW2)
MPG.Dl_2 MPG.Dl_1 or 5.00 %
air partial pres. meas. DW1 M PG.Dl_S MPG.D2_2 MPG.D2_1 or 5.00 %
air partial pres. meas. DW2 MPG.D2_S
l 9/
25A5764 su so.17 GEM &M
v 3
Table 6.1:
INSTRUMENTATION REQUIRED
Backup Accuracy Incadon MPG.Dl_3 MPG.DI 2 or 5.00 %
air pardal pres. meas. DW1 MPG.Dl_1 MPG.D2_.S MPG.D2_2 or 5.00 %
air partial pres. rneas. DW2 MPG.D2_1 MPG.Sl MPG.S2 5.00 %
air partial pres meas.%W1 MPG.S2 MPG.Sl 5.00 %
air partial pres. meas. %W2 MV.MS) (1) hW.MS2 N/A volume Dow meas. Main Steam line RPV->DW1 MV.MS2 (1)
MV.MSI N/A volume flow meas. Main Steam line RPV->DW2 MV.Pl F MD.PlF 3.00 %
volume Cowmeas. PCCI Feed DW1->PCCI (1)(2)
MV.P2F MD.P2F S.00 %
volume Dow meas. PCC2 Feed DW2->PCC2 (1)(2)
MV. PSF MD. PSF S.00 %
volume Cow meas. PCCS Feed DW2->PCCS (1)(2) 4 l
i G
25A5764 su wo. n ggg arv. 3 Table 6.1:
INSTRUMENTATION REQUIRED
Backup Accuracy Locadon MPG.D1_3 MPG.D1_2 or 5.00 %
air pardal pres. meas. DW1 MPG.Dl_1 MPG.D2_3 MPG.D2_2 or 5.00 %
air pardal pres. meas. DW2 MPG.D2_1 MPG.Sl MPG.S2 5.00 %
air partial pres. meas. WW1 MPG.S2 MPG.Sl 5.00 %
air pardal pres meas. WW2 MV.MSI (1)
MV.MS2 N/A volume flow meas. Main Steam line RPV->DW1 MV.MS2 (1)
MV.MSI N/A volume flow meas. Main Steam line RPV->DW2 MV.PlF MD.P1F S.00 %
volume flow meas. PCCI Feed DWl >PCC1 (1)(2)
MV.P2F MD.P2F S.00 %
volume flow meas. PCC2 Feed DW20PCC2 (1)(2)
MV.P3F MD.P3F S.00 %
volume flow meas. PCCS Feed DW2->PCCS (1)(2) l 0
a 6<
25A5764 su so.18 ggg asv. S Table 6.1:
INSTRUMENTATION REQUIRED
Backup Accuracy Iocation MW.RP.1 S.00 %
electrical power meas Reactor Pressure Vessel / RPV MW.RP.2 3.00 %
electrical power meas Reactor Pressure Vessel / RPV MW.RP.S 3.00 %
electrical power meas Reactor Pressure Vessel / RPV MW.RP.4 S.00 %
electrical power meas Reactor Pressure Vessel / RPV MW.RP.5 S.00 %
electrical power meas Reactor Pressure Vessel / RPV MW.RP.6 S.00 %
electrical power meas Reactor Pressure Vessel / RPV
(+) Top Priority Measurements, additional high priority temperature measurements are defirted in the text of this section.
(*) It is required that temgerature monitoring capability with an accuracy of 1.5*C be available for these tests as described in the text of this section.
(") PANDA instrumentation identification system is described in Section 5.2 of ALPHA 410
($) Differential accuracy over short time intervals is i0.02m (c) When the pools are isolated from each other there is no backup instrument (1) For volumetric flow rate measurements, all additional measurements (pressure and temperature) required to convert the volumetric flow rate to a mass flow rate are required.
(2) 2 of the 3 volumetric flowmeters for PCC feed hncs are required.
(S) All instrumentation listed in this table is required to be operable only while the monitored process value is within the instruments operating range as defined in Table 5.3 of AI.PHA-410.
1
3 I
S<
25A5764 sH No.19 gg arv. 3 7.
DATA RECORDING. PROCFMING AND ANALYSIS 7.1 Data Recording During (approximately) the first two hours of the test (until the first drywell pressure peak is reached) the data for all channels will be recorded at 6 sampics per minute. During the rest of the test (after the peak drywell pressure is reached) the data will be recorded at 1 sampic per minute. It is necessary that the data sampling rate be suflicient to record opening and closing of the vacuum breakers between the drywells and wetwells.
7.2 Data Records The digitally acquired data will be recorded in real time for the entire duration of the test.
Immediately after the test, a copy of the data file will be created in order to have a backup record of the data file. Also to be recorded with this data file are allinformation required to perform subsequent processing of the data.
7.3 Data Sheets The following data sheets will be prepared for each test for inclusion in the PANDA Test File (PTF). The unique test number will be printed on each sheet.
- 1) print table containing the list of the measurements with their main characteristics (identification, span, calibration constants, associated error, location on the facility, measurement channel number and sampling frequency)
- 2) graphs of top priority measurements identified in Section 6 as a function of time (time histories). Graphs may show groups of up to 8 test measurements.
- 3) print table showing the position (status) of all oneff valves,just after the beginning andjust before the end of the test and periodically throughout the duration of the test.
7.4 Data Processing and Analysis During the preconditioning of the test facility and during the running of the transient tests,the operators will monitor the required instrumentation identified for these tests in Table 6.1. The operators will check whether or not redundant measurements are consistent and perform other cengruency checks including zero checks as possible to verify that the instrumentation and data acquisition system are working correctly.
Following completion of the tests described in Section 9, data reduction will be performed to support preparation of the Apparent Test Results Reports (ATR). This data reduction will include a representative set of time history plots of system flows, differential pressure, vessel pressures, air 1
I 1
0' 25A5764 SH No. 20
@gh uv. S partial pressure (O2 sensor readout), and temperatures covering the full tesi duration for top priority measurements. These results will be reviewed and reported in the ATR (see Secdon 10).
The Data Transmittal Report (DTR) will transmit all the data for the transient integral system tests (see Section 10).
}
ame 4
1 g%
25A5764 sH No.21 GEbclarnrEsungy
- S 8.
SRAKFDOWN TFSTS 8.1 Purpose The purposes of the shakedown tests are to:
- confirm test facility ability to establish a quashsteady state set ofinitial conditions
- confirm adequacy of data acquisition system
- confirm ability to achieve a smooth but rapid transition between the pre-test inidal condidons line-up to the test line-up
. confirm the adequacy of the test procedures.
't The PANDA facility will be configured as described in Section 4. The reference test numbers are from Section 9. The detailed test procedure with its check lists are contained in the PANDA Transient Integral System Test Procedures for Tests MS and M4 (AI.PHA-520) and Test M7 (ALPHA-521).
8.2 Description Test SDM41 will be donc per the test procedure for Test M3 using the initial conditions specified for Test MS.The focus of the shakedown test will be to evaluate 1) the procedure for achieving test initial condidons,2) the procedures to initiate the test, and 3) the capability of the data recording system, the power control system, etc to perform as required throughout the transient test duration.
The procedure as drafted in ALPHA-520 Rev. A will be used, and modifications will be introduced as needed. These modifications will be incorporated into the final procedures.
A1.PHA -520 & ALPHA-521, to be issued prior to initiation of Tests MS, M4 and M7, as applicab!c.
t
.+
9 25A5764 su so. 22 ggg nev. S 9.
TFST MATRIX 9.1 Test Description A series of transient integral tests will be conducted using the PANDA facility configured as described in Section 4. The tests will be performed using the detailed procedures in ALPHA-520
. and AI.PHA-521. The following summarizes the test procedure.
The drywells, wetwells, CDCS tank and PCC pools will be pre <onditioned and brought separately
{
to their required initial conditions (or slightly higher temperatures and/or pressures if heat loss or stabilization is expected to bring conditions within their required range).
Once the initial conditions of the various vessels are confirmed to match the values specified in Table 9.3, the test is initiated as follows:
Start to open all valves which must be open in lines between vessels per the test configuration in Section 4, except the vahes in the RPV to drywell steamlines, within a period of approximately 5 minutes.
Then, the following sequence should be performed as quickly as possib!c:
1)
Open the valves in both RPV to drywell steamlines 2) a) For M3, MBA, MSB & M4 place RPV heater controls in automatic operation to follow the time dependent heater powerdetermined from the specification in Table 9.2.
b) For M7 establish RPV heater power operation for a value of 1.13 MW From this point on the only operator action regarding test facility configuration or conditions will be as follows:
For Test M3 & M7 there are no further required operator actions.
For Test MSA and MSB the only operator actions will be the mainterance of the PCC poollevels.
For test M3, MSA, M3B & M4 at the end of 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> data recording will be terminated, and the test performance is complete.
For test M7 continue the test for at least 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
l
l i
9 25A5764 sH No.23 GEhiuclearEr~.yy
"" 3 Table 9.1: INITIAL CONDITIONS INITIAL CONDITIONS FOR PANDA TESTS MS, MSA, MSB RPV Drywell Wetwell GDCS PCC/IC Pools (4)
Total Pressure (kPa) 295 294 285 294
-100 Air Pressure (kPa) 0 13 240 274 N/A Vapor Temperature (K) 406 404 352 SSS N/A Liquid Temperature (K) 406 404 352 SSS
-373 Collapsed Water Level (m) (1) 11.2 (2)
S.8 10.7 (S)
(4)
INAuAL CONDITIONS FORPANDATEST M7 RPV Drywell Wetwell GDCS PCC/IC Pools (4)
Total Pressure (kPa) 131 131 131 131
-100 Air Pressure (kPa) 0 13]
86 Ill N/A Vapor Temperature (K)
S80
-300 352 SSS N/A I.iquid Temperature (K)
S80 N/A 352 SSS
-S73 Collapsed Water I evel (m) (1) 11.2 N/A S.8 10.7 (3)
(4)
Notes: (1)
Water levels are specified relative to the top of the PANDA heater bundle.
~
(2)
The nominal DW condition is no water. However, a small amount ofspill from the RPV to the DW at the start of the test is acceptable.
(S)
The GDCS level should be positioned in hydrostatic equilibrium with the RPV level (including an appropriate adjustment for temperature difference).
i (4)
The PCC/IC pools level (as applicable) for tests MS, MSA, MSB is 23.2, for test M7 it is 23.6
,c 25A5764 susa24 g@UL 6 2
Tame 9.2s: POWER FOR PANDA *1TSTS MS, MSA, MSB, M4; l
~ "nc.Powervs he TIME FROM DECAYHEAT (%)
PANDA DECAY SCRAM (sec)
HEAT (MW) 3600 (Test start) 0.0132 1.056 3650 0.0151 1.048 4000 0.0127
' '.016 5000 0.0119 0.952 6000 0.0112 0.896 7000 0.0107 0.856 7200 0.0106 0.848 8000 0.0103 0.824 9000 0.0100 0.800 10000 0.00972 0.778 14400 0.00928 0.742 18000 0.00881 0.705 20000 0.00859
~
0.687 28800 0.00788 0.630 S0000 0.00781 0.625 36000 0.00748 0.598 40000 0.00729 0.5SS 50000 0.00689 0.551 60000 0.00658 0.526 70000 0.00631 0.505 80000 0.0 % 09 0.487
i 9
25A5764 SH NO. 25 N N M b~nIwy/
TaWe 9.2b: POWER FOR PANDA TESIS MS, MSA, MSB, M4; l
(Total Power *)/(Decay Power) vs. Time TIME FROM SCRAM TOTAL POWER */ DECAY (sec)
POWER 3600 (Test Start) 1.070 5000 1.058 7500 1.038 10,000 1.025 12,500 1.019 15,000 1.016 20,000 1.010 25,000 5.008 30,000 1.007 72,000 1.000
-
- Total power includes contribudon from reactor structure stored energy Note: Tolerance on PANDA power throughout transient is 2 25 kW or 0.025 MW.
9 9
25A5764 sNko.26 ggg arv. S 9.2 Test Acceptance Criteria In order to assure the objecdves of these tests are met,it is necessary that:
- 1) the values over the 1 minute period prior to the test for the following initial conditions must be within the specified ranges referenced to Table 0.1:
- Total Pressure (kPa) reference matrix value i 4 kPa (all wssels except
=
- Drywell Air Partial Pressure (kPa)=
reference manix value i 2 kPa (for Tests MS, MSA, MSB and M4)
- Drywell Air Partial Pressure (kPa)=
reference matrix value i 8 kPa (for Test M7)
- Mean Vapor Temperature (K) reference matrix m!ue 12 *K (all vessels /all tests
=
except DW for M7)
- Iocal Vapor Temperature (K) mean value 2 *K (allwssels/all tests except DW
=
for M7)
- Mean Liquid Temperature (K) =
reference matrix value 12 *K (except for PCC/iG pools)
- Mean Liquid Temperature Saturadon temperature at actual environmr tal
=
pressure +0/-4 'K (for PCC/IC pools)
- IocalI.iquid Temperature (K) mean value i 2 *K
=
- Wetwell and GDCS Water Levels =
reference matrix value d 0.100 m
- RPV Water Level reference matrix value i 0.200 m
=
- PCC PoolIcvel reference matrix mlue10.200 m
=
)
- 2) the required instrumentation defined in Section 6 and Tab!c 6.1 be operational
- 3) at test initiation and throughout the transient (to be confirmed during post-test data analpis):
- RPV Power
= reference matrix alue 2 25 kW or 0.025 MW i
1 l
1 t
6 25A5764 sH No.27 GEnkucleartr~.yy
- " S
- 4) and throughout the transient the PCC Pool Irvel be maintained as follows:
- For Test MS & M7 PCC Poollevel no required level maintenance during the
=
test
- For Test MSA PCC Pool level = reference matrix value10.S m
- For Test MSB PCC Pool Level = reference matrix value 0.2 m 9
l 10.
REPQRTE One brief Apparent Test Results (ATR) report will be prepared covering the results for each of the transient integral tests based on the data reduction described in Section 7. The ATR will summarize the apparent results. The format for this report will include: test number, test objective, test date, data recording period, names of data files, list of failed or unavailable instruments considered to be required for the test, list of pressure and differential pressure instruments with zero not in tolerance or over-range during test, deviadons from test procedure, problems, table of actual initial conditions based on average and standard deviadon over a one minute time periodjust before the start of the test of all parameters with a specified acceptance criteria in rection 9.1 and time history plots of top priority measurements over the test duradon.
The ATR report is a verified report, approved by the PSI PANDA Project i Nnager, and will be transmitted to the GF. within approximately two wecks of the completion of each transient integel system test.
The Data Transmittal Report (DTR) containing all data for transient integral system tests MS,
. MSA, MSB, M4, M7 will be issued approximately two months after the last test is performed. It will provide detailed information on the test facility configuradon, test instrumentation, test conditions and the format for the data. In addition, samples of data will be presented in tables and plots. The DTR will be verified before it is issued, approved by the PSI PANDA Project Manager,and then be transmitted to GF l
t 25A5764 su so 28 ggg nev. 3
- FINA1, 11.
TFST HOLD / DECISION POINTS The Test Procedures No. AI.PHA-520 and ALPHA-521 must have been reviewed and approwd by GE's Project Manager, GE Site QA Representative and PSI's PANDA Project Manager before the transient testing described in Section 9 can be performed.
One additional hold / decision point will occur after the shakedown tests described in Secdon 8.
GE's PANDA Project Manager or Site QA Representative and PSI's PANDA Project Manager must approve the test configuration, instrumentation, and conditions for the tests described in Section 9 (Tests MS, MSA, MSB, M4 and M7),after the shakedown tests (SDM41) have been completed and the results have been reviewed.
i 1