ML20092K511
| ML20092K511 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 02/17/1992 |
| From: | DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20092K507 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9202250221 | |
| Download: ML20092K511 (9) | |
Text
% 743 k
- PROPOSED CHANGES ATTACHMENT 1 9
9202250221 920217 PDR ADOCK 05000413 P PDR
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.2.3 CATAWBA SAFETY REVIEW GROUP FUNCTION 6.2.3.1 The Catawba Safety Review Group ( SRG) shall function to provide the reviewofplantdesignandoperatingexper[ience-forpotentialopportunities improve plant safety; evaluation of plant operations and maintenance activities; and, to adv1 e management on the overall quality and safety of plant operations. The SRG shall make recommendations for revised procedures, equipment modifications, or other means of improving plant safety to appropriate station / corporate management.
COMPOSITION -
6.2. 3. 2j k: CPC h.: ;. ;;;:d c' ri ' ::t f ; . , usu,whwu, iu . , , , , ,
[nnginomre __
ig -s&are nnc4+n cirs ,h;!' (;,, ,, ,.
(- 1) ^ b:!'^l r': d "* In ^"[4*"^"4"; " r:l ".t:d :: f :r,:; ;-.d d l gf.h s.,,
2 ;: = p, c.a m ;; :;.;: . # . i . . .._ i c. ' ;/:.. . c..,.,...,...
g _n f uh47 h avno, h 3 ,A 11 km 4 ., +w. -.7s;;7 ej,;,
gg m a+
om.-_+
3.se+
t 7
n.,__,. .
e<
3-
_;l;;, ;7:;7;; :-g ' ,g 7- w3m- u 'd ; ;;,,,,,
(2) it 1::;t 0 7.;,, .7r..........
1;.;l _;;ri:.:: :,, ,/h., 'i; , . , .
4-R:::t 5 j:: : :' ' i d, m y , . . .w. ,,:, 1' b: +'^-"-'^'#'d.
]4'.- :' 50% ef th:::
- ~ :---! :h:!' 5: : : g :1i::ti:-- a^-4'4^d 4-l' RESPONSIBILITIES 6.2.3.3 The[SRGshallberesponsiblefor;
- a. Review of selected p'~ t operating characteristics and other appropriate sources or plant design and operating experience information for awareness and-incorporation into the performance of other duties.
- b. Review of the effectivaness of corrective actions-taken as a result-of the evaluation of' selected plant operating characteristics and l other appropriate sources of plant design ind operating experience information, i
- c. Review-of. selected programs, procedures, and plant activities, including maintenance, modification, operational problerr,s, and-operational analysis.
CATAWBA - UNITS 1 & 2 6-6 Amendment No77 (Unit- 1)
Amendtr.ent No71 (Unit 2)
fnsed A The SRG shall be composed of at least five individuals and at least three of these shall have a bachelor's degree in engineering or related science and at least 2 years professional level experience in his/her field, at least 1 year of which experience shall be in the nuclear field.
The remaining individuals in the SRG shall have either (1) at least 5 years of nuclear experience and hold or have held a Senior Reactor Operator license; or (2) at least 8 years of professional level experience in his/her field, at least 5 years of which experience shall be in the nuclear field.
l l
. . - - - . - .. - . - . .. .- __- - _ . _ . - - -. - . _- - . - ~.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 1 ,
- 6. 5 REVIEW AND AUDIT 3 6.5.1 TECHNICAL REVIEW AND CONTROL ACTIi/ITIES 6.5.1.1 Each procedure and program required by Specification 6.8 and other procedures which affect nuclear safety, and changes thereto, shall be prepared by a qualified individual / organization. Each such procedure, and changes ,
thereto, shall be .*eviewed by an individual / group other than the individual / '
group which prepared the procedure, or changes thereto, but who may be from the same organization as the individual / group which prepared the procedure, or changes thereto.
6.5.1.2 Proposed changes to the Appendix A 7echnical Specifications shall be prepared by a qualified individual / organization. The preparation of each proposed Technical Specification change shall be reviewed by an individual /
group other than the individual / group which prepared the proposed change, but who may be from the same organization as the individual / group which prepared the proposed change. Proposed changes to the Technical Specifications shall. I be approved by the Station Manager. l 6.5.1.3 Proposed modifications to unit nuclear safety-related structures, systems, and c:mponents shall be designed by a qualified individual / organization.
Each such modification shall be reviewed by an individual / group other than the individual / group which designed the modification, but who may be from the same n . organization as the individual / group which designed the modification. li'c;p_
Sp/am[ -^ :'!at := = auc a. r ; ; , re .;.;; :r;:tra , ;j:tr:, 2-d rn;2ats g kh:' b; ;;; m;d r. . . w m 'mm.t r.ien L, th; S;;tien ta:.;;r; r b; th:
0;r;ti .; C ; ;, ...;;nde.. , ths T;;hai al Sm. v iu. S ur. . . . . sm . . . . ; , t"*ia*-a=a~
//)ggr Cunorintenda + ne +he c ,
_7.4a+-ada- M intanes+aA ce ka A.12 g , ;; 7 7 7 7_7 7 , 3 1 f e 4[":t d E, U$ th; [t;ti-- "r:;r. _
6.5.1.4 Individuals responsible for reviews pe/ Q fo ~ity...--.u y/ce Avsdent] om de Specifications 6.5.1.1, 6.5.1.2, a A 4.5.1.3 sha ll be members of the t tix g supervisory staff, previously desightM by theit;;i.. 7tr;r to perform such reviews. Review of environmentai .ediological analysis procedures shall i be pe r fo rmed by the 4+*H. .t. s, . wa.. .. '. J. T; , . . . . O or hi s - des ignee. Each suchreviewshallii clude a determination of whather or not additional, cross-disciplinary, revie is necescary. If deemed necessary,'such review shall be performed by the a repriate aesignated ; eview personnel.
_ 6.5.1.5J Pr;;:xd 9+ =nd avnacima - : r =t-:tnir r'n ;;'-ty
] m -_. -_u.~ ,a ., n a rend ne Ta k - ' ' ^3--e ehn11 he cau 4 ~ A
-hpfy, l Fy +Eb'$i55. ldh.
9- < r: ::; ret = ,
. v, J.s th; min Opr;. ea;...=tin;1:5EEE5b,
- r Studut, .*".
r"'nl [
thT:m. : .tudr2
^#
'-t: . etsJ 0;hjd l i ;, = ;- s i ^ r 'y d"" 4:r '+ ad by '" Et.t!..It :;c .-
W y \
cA &-
lGenent/ MimenEnnnwo:WSemus J W--
CATAWBA - Ut.ITS 1 & 2 6-7
-)
l Anendment
, . . . . ...No. 80w .. . (Unit 1)
4 INSERT B proposed modifications to nuclear safety-related structures, s'* stems, and components shall be approved prior to implementation by the Station Manager; or for the Station Manager by the Mechanical Superintendent, the operations Superintendent, the I and E superintendent, or the Work Control Superintendent, as previously designated by the Station Manager.
INhERT C Proposed taats and experiments which affect station nuclear safety and tre not addressed in the FSAR or Technical Specifications shall be reviewed by the Station Manager; or for the Station Manager by the Mechanical Superintendent, the Operations Superintenda.it, the 1 and E Superintendent, or the Work Control Superintendent, as previously designated by the Station Manager.
9
ACHINISTRATIVE CON'ROLS FUNCTICN (Continued)
- d. Metallurgy, '
- a. Instrumentation and, control,
- f. Radiological safety,
- g. Mechanical and electrical engineering, and
- h. Administrative control and quality assurance practices.
The NSRB shall report to and advise the '!";; Iruider,t, Mim h .m.
on those areas of responsibility specified in Scacifications 6.5.2.8 and 6.5.2 9.
,0RGANIZATION I
Mer 6.5.2.2 The Director, me.. ers, and alt'arnate members of the NSRB shall be p-- appointed in writing by the lice "re i f.;r.t, "r'nr ' :d=ti: , and shall have
- an academic degree in an engineering or physical science field; and in addition, shall have a minimum of 5 years technical experience, of which a minimum of 3 years shall be in one or more areas given in Specification 6.5.2.1.
>c more than two alternates shall participate as voting members in NSRB activities at any one time.
6.5.2.3 The NSRB shall be composed of at least five members including the Director. Members of the N3RB may be from the Nuclear ' ;du .i n Department, from other departments within the Company, or from external to the Company. A i
m of one member of the NSRB may be from the Catawba Nuclear 5t:gy.g 6.5.2.4 Consultants shall be utilized as determined by the NSRB Director to
- provide expert advice to the NSRB, 6.5.2.5 Staff assistance may be provided to the NSRB in order to promote the proper, timely, and expeditious performance of its functions.
6.5.2.6 The NSRB shall meet at least once per calendar quarter during the initial year of unit operation following fuel loading and at least once per 6 months thereafter.
6.5.2.7 The quorum of the NSRB necessary for the performance of the NSRB review and audit functions of these Technical Specifications shall consist of the Director, or his designated alternate, and at least four other NSRB nemeers including alternates. No more than a minority of the quorum
( shall have line responsib;1ity for operation of Catawba Nuclear Station. -
Zn specin{ cgses,, ceppi'g(es .h aystMmed ArtMaar en l
gpf
[ ACAWlMM We tid /n infth ters'n or PAf3tcs/ Science, Me O
/'/'O A mihimm s/ n yens espedereeone&y de i 1 lR*Ot ertLL /t)Speciffs eg,y 4,g,y, CATAWBA - UNITS 1 & 2 6-9
a ADMINISTRAT!VE CONTROLS 6.8 PROCEDURES AND h 0 DRAMS 6.3.1 Written procedures shall be established, implemented, ano mair.tained covering the activities referenced belows
- a. The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978
- b. The emergency operating procedures required to implement the require-nients of NUREG-0737 and Supplement No. 1 to NUREG-0737 as stated in Generic Letter No. 82-33: 4 ppug mana en O(/r/t/ Q g ;; a' q r1;; i,,,,, 6 n m wn r Sqped/tM/*r/ m#Id$
pe/e te g n. d _e . ,.... , , . . ~ , , . .. .. .+ . . . . . . . ,
W two of M&
Jg ygg r gg Q
- e. PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM implementation -
- f. OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL implementations
, g. Quality Assurance Program implementition for effluen nd environmental monitoring;
- h. Fire Protection Program implementation
- 1. Comitments contained in F er 16.0.
6.8.2 Eachprocedureoff 1 cation 6.8.1,andchangesthereto,shallbe reviewed and approved by. : it:ti;; " ::;;r :- ky- ,1) 0;:--t ';; it;;. 'ri-
+=ade-t, (2) 'xb-!:;l L,,,i m. L,,u insenuun6, W n. ins. nance auperins nu...;r e g em.. 4..--2 -. 3 t..---3.-2 e-y m i4_;, _,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,y
'l : S t.t i .. - , , , , prior to implementation and shall be reviewed riodically as set forth in administrative procedures.
procedures which implement offsite environmental, technical and aboratory For M "activities,theabovereviewandapprovalmaybeperformedbytheg:anager, n.~ ..m Environmental Services or" - 9, ". 94.24 mag n :t ed T&- f7-
- ' !;;t-S:
a ., ,. . . ,. 4 : _ e 77 :..+ re;3...... ,
- 4. 34 g s 7--y1 .n,,
6.8.3 Temporary changes to procedure of Soetification S.8.1 may be made pro-yided esjq n g l xgggg
- a. The intent of the original procedure is not alteredt
- b. The change is approved by two members of the plant management f, at least one of whom holds a Senior Operator license on t nit affected: and
- c. The change is du r- '-d trf -d, :S approved t': S t.thn u: :;: , :- b;. ('.} 0; "+4"0 ("a* 4=+^-d'a* . "" ' n t-in'L,,...s S1; r';t r ert, (?} " '-+-"-- '"r- 4-'- "
d--i--
t, ;r (t) L ,.,;,,m..m.m.
- a k y +'- S'i--
d h t : ; ' " e ^ '" ' ' -_ ; , x ; r '-"y A ampsey within 14 days of implementation.
l 6.8.4 The following programs shall be established, implemented, and maintained:
- a. Primary Coolent Sources _0utside Containment l
A program to reduce leakage from those portions of systems outside containment that could contain highly radioactive fluids during a serious trpnyient or accident- to as low as practical levels. The mtem intTude the containment spray, Safety injection, chemical
!y be ; 'rnd b O,; L;r'-t--f -t c' Siid 7
-^;,ic. ;nd I;;rr!!'
9- f n r.
CATAWBA - UNITS 1 & 2 6-13' Amendment No. 92 Unit 1 i
Amendment No. 86 ((Unit 2))
1 CATAWBA HUCLEAR STATION Proposed Technical Specification Change Dated December 18, 1991 ATTACHMENT 2 Item 11 please chango specification 5.2.3.2 to read -
The SRG shall be composed. of at least i vo individuals and at least throo of these shall he . oa bachelor's degree in engincorjng or related science k and at 1 cast 2 years prorossionn1 lovel experience in his/her field, at least 3 year of which exporlence shall bo in the nuclear field.
The remaining individuals in the SRG shall have either (1) at Icast 5 years of nuclear experience and hold or have hold a Senior Reactor operator license; or (2) at least 8 years of professional levol experion e in his/her field, at i t.a st 5 years of whica experienco shall bo in the nuclear field.
Basos: This proposed change clarifies the intent of the present tecnnical specification. The requirement for three degreed engincors is consistent with the original licensing of Catawba in which credit was given for the review and approval of the McGuire organization. The NRC had accepted the onsite SRG of this componition due the corporato support organization providing some of the assessment function that had been called for in the original TMI requirement (Item I.B.1.2),
i Item 2: pleano change the last sentonce of specificotion 6.5.1.2 to read as follows:
Proposed changes to_ the Technical Specifications shall be approved by the Station Manager.
Bases: Our submittal dated Docomber 18, 1991, had proposed to add the phraso "or his designoc" to the end of this sentence. This has been determined to be vague and in fact unnecessary. It is our understanding that in situations whero the Station Manager is unavailable, the individual acting on his behalf may in f act approve proposed technical specification changes. This is particularly important when the Station Manager is on travol and the need for an omorgency technical specification arisos. In this instance, the individual standing in for the Station Manager is in fact autnorized to approve any proposed technical specifications. Thus we conclude the previously proposed change is unnecessary.
Item 3: Please reviso Insert at the bottom of pago 6-9 to road as follows:
In special casos, candidatos for appointment without an academic degree in engineering or physical science may be quallflod with a minimum of ten years experience in once of the areas in Specification 6.S.2.1.
Basos The curro it requirement for NSRB membership is five years of technical experience, in addition to the nominal four-years for a degroo. For non-degroed individuals, an additional year of technical experience has boon ostablished such that a minimum of ton _ year s experience is required in these special casos.
Item 4: Please change specifications 6.3.2 and 6.8.3.c. to read as follows:
6.8.2 Each proceduro of Specification 6.8.1 and changes thoroto, shall be approved by a group manager, superintendent / manager, or c.no of their designated dit 'ct reports prior to implementation and shall _bo reviewed periodically as not forth in j administrativo procedures....
6.8.3.c The change is approved by a group manager, superintendent / manager, or one of their designated direct reports within 14 days of implementation. ;
Bases: Our submittal dated December 18, 1991, had proposed to include the phrase " site vice president or his designee". It was determined that this phrase was vaguo. Accordingly, the above language is proposed. Duke believes that procedure approval should be accomplished by the appropriate designated implementing manager. This philosophy is consistent with the staff position contained in SRP 17.3 and as proposed in the Duke QA Topical. Duke is ompowering managers-to assure quality in the performance of their assigned work activities. W believe that this is better than the. previous way of having higher levels of management assure quality by approving the multitude of procedures that are used in the plants today.
Station directivos will includo details on imple tentation of approval requirements.
. . . . . . _ _