ML20092K300

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances for JULY-DECEMBER 1983

ML20092K300
Person / Time
Issue date:	12/31/1983
From:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I02, NUREG-0750-V18-I02, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I2, NUREG-750-V18-I2, NUDOCS 8406280209
Download: ML20092K300 (131)

Text

~ ~. '

• Yp&A."9 ',;. ', $. ;, <_., %

1. a\\s.

s{

5%.; - '

, ;' ry;.

-r

-,s

=;_

's

.,'n 4.w'w'd;5 l; if '

• Q ',?m'Y W'k, % 5 Am.

.t li

.n, 3

v~.

~

d v w.. $;e'L

' Y. <? *,

U r.'..l [w..? Lj a'C..',~5 ' -

f.A w T'

s

a, Q ! a f L n,r' Es!.! k % f. h ;je.* d '

p ;.-liC' s (

mp

.,,x' s C

3 ~, r.L:,Y.K ^$.,h,, '

?di -'

(,,o,',c t' ;.

.k 7

7

'q:2 %34,,4,5%

4 7,g x

~-pt g

-l f % -:*a-a

,n-

,. 7 t ny,t

,6,,,

- n 1 a., ', ;, '33 t g

n. 7.

9,. 'd ".'[g@- ~ M. 8 - '

,;.t5 m2 7

)

7,:, t ~ : v 4.,;.

• v t -n -. e.e :D. -1 r

gmg

. w e :-r..

,c 77'

[fS d, n a m' & yd.N'd,[j.D 2.f d

-' h,4 f..k. v,~ -

,s

, C ("

g X

mm

',?W'" Y'.+M A"*w*% & W'A M?$. 'fi'N I

=

, " v; a ae

?

',.: in. :d.'L'~ ? a'. W Y" ".'%.:t.:~:.,N'W' f ' 'T

[~

C >O 'O-t..

~

A i

e h> @-: f a

s C

'c

, G +n" c-

@r

~

1*.fA

.g> c.73((N

. i. f l f

/-

1,r,A

^

Q%;4 V p+g,>pM..Q. ~q:p: g

W;M M..f@N N;%:n;u%.

4 1 yk4 w

3 3

g%

.-f;

'T p '

- 1 p Q My

.iry ")

y E

....n # 9:,s g 4.3 g

m i o,

)jg%g.w

. M:

3

y. J

. u-e

~~

e f.x_p;yf; %g 4c r.yyyy.

e-a c

z

p yM;f;&+Q d

- g y:7

9

'u

' p :t ' wdqm l.

, 4 ;-. m

-' l p q -ig byQ V y:.p 'a

(

g A (;;,s p %m?, m,o Q ;g,p;p $c % [N h h

h k; M $g

. n

$kI'=k k}hbfYb k @i$5 ;hhk!

d'U kh fi 6

em pq&

.A.

w

.u.

V,, :p'7DJth}DlfMON,W. n;3 *n.

,c

.. g.,

y

%..::b:

m O :'s ":-

Y

.c g,e,2$ n.

.c sob c,-4 c \\

• +v.

M'tr.,, -"t s

y p ot v;,,.1,Q.h.*c y

• ?,

S

.g i +

• p 94:

-Q :'., f,$,

q.,,.

f.g q As Lyg*T mt f

• b ' : J ',

• i.--

Q.

. g ; 3. 'gg t,y

i. f p%,,_.,

g r j% g. 1

'i % : -?

Q'.

t 4

+/;J hp,,3 g r-lkk b

f hbhK.,h:-k.

-- Y,$

@ @4 u.a$ W b g'g D(R O $lA Q @fh 2Q C'i a,Wr J E

JR d E e

ikm gev<ySgbjjp 4;*y j u

l. g a-m Q

sb Taw 0

,Y p C

a w

Maajggg:qmag:ung,yggg$g'y 7

w m, N

4-a,y2 % m V M yjh$y g g g g 4 4 j: 4f f 4 h

ggggggg h7 n,-

g; E

L

&mqayJnspe Nwsg -

,.g; Ap>zco, P@w@emm_g39y$w$w%g j;;

y ;qzg wpamfew q

}q 35 gj gg y+y.

mm

.._e, _. g~. _u mge,

o s

e,.

~

.$ f.:..

l-0 I

Y a

.3

'./-

<9 M

Pe g;

o (0

OD O %-aC

--C.

i w

ec m

'O.'

l

>= W M

llg V

!Mb OZ

>- <(

co O

O _,a43

.M:

1,:

h m

b l

b Dm G)

Vtt

.O

,0

mO=

m E

"4 L3d g emmS W

O 3

w

-Q)

SOS

/ Q.1 N

gg*

Z,,,,,

m,m i

s -

eu m

• i..

i

=M e

2 D

O Z O U

^-

W.'

=

s

-5 p.

k,j.%

?

.9

=-

.).

.,..,5..

.g,,

A 7.,

s..

,.i

., e,.

gg ya

..' -- g.

v r. *~, w.

u n, O

.Y

,a.*-.

's

.. ', r.x..; ;- (,.,.,.:. s.q

,e ;

g

.. 7. 6,-

Q.,, S. C

< b, 6p

. v. ey L. 3.r.

x

i _

u

.. '=

o I.

g...j..

_4

?

j

)*

.t f- *,4

- w,..&

4

4.,..

7 s...,

4.'%:.'.

,. A. :

n;-

,. a. :

_ :.. y. o 2,.m

..g-

,e A...

u.

- p;--..

~..c. -

4..

c.

a

~

n c;.

v.

s, ;,

r.-

..+ -

.,....x..- s

e...-

- +..

~,;

. e r:q4 c,..,-

. =..

~

=, -.

N W. i.. Z.

x ' -. q+,.

-'t n, tn n

);$,. :.. -..,

... ". a %.. '.. #

S g-

. c. >

.m.

.. J.,, ;.

- ?

• K.

.M., f 4....

n

.,.. s,-

. _ i4.. w.<~

~

l'..

, g.... /.

g.

>. n

%. s p-

.s....

(

.y u.

+~

.r

..<,x.

..n.

A,

- ~.

~.

-y

,.n.

'(,

, - s...

2

..~

., *=.

g, + +:;.. f,., g, ?.

r.

.. 7 L...

a y,,

u

< o. -

r,.

(\\,j..

.:,3,p y;

- ',..,~,, =.. '

.u

-..,g.

g..

.,. gu

..,. 4. y.-

.3 -

'E 1... y

a..~g...'.

'. ' sir.

5, a

y..

m a

..>t-.,..,. -..

g Y y;.

$.* '.... '., / --

'q

• i.-,,."

e -,

,5

.,3;' *' ~

L.,

.,@...,..'.. ~. ',.,.,.

t

. ;.. P,

,y '* -

g,.;

s. j.

f.

e.. -.,, ir s,,, &

y'-

.4 -...-

t, a'

-'e.

. -'N' w

J

• g. p Wr

..,;,,. ~.'m

{e g

. t

k. '

?

yL4,;,

p

.%'v' s.

~

-.f,,f.gm. 6. s...

4

. i..-

y

y -.:

s.

...,%.w

.,. 3

,,.-.,v.

-.5.,.4

.j..*u,-

r

.,,.-g,,.., ". '.. j-

m. -.

- - c.,.i.: -

.y e

,4 r g6.5 se. r' v,..

e, K.'

.,...,..u

~

6

.f, j.y. ss.(:.

s

,,,,- g og*

'd,' g

,e i

, -.,k,',,',t-.

I

.p j'

(w - -

J,'

e. g.,,' e-,f,"..

. Y';'

'.,.,8'

".s 4#e-i. g/.. ".,

'*'b

{,

s,

n,.

3 V.,,

.e,.,,

j 4.*

• y_

g

,o.

g= F e-

.W

.r s. ;.. s _...,

4

.d..,c,.

g. J c.y,.-.e..

y..

• i e-8 k.

4 o,

.-. ~

,,y p.

3 s+

1.

+

4.

g

.; i.

.s j ;*g fy..

e.

i

• • N

• ' ?'?

.l4 y <,.

,,'5

'.2j, " Y' '. y. [.,. Y, 'i ;1 * ',

qg;*;,+ ~'

n '.

\\,

• e

,?

• a "W

• l} _

y

. -f V.

2.

a f

y 3 -

a p,p),.e.w 4...

(*. d. : [ '.r '..

g' j '.

,,4<

.3 g',

,, T y

$b.: -[p '

't '

,-.],

1. - s 1-3 ',

. k,'.',, '. fg.. h.

e-

.t.

E.

c

+ ' g,,. [,, *.6.

/

i 1

...,,,. 8q,

f.,.-.

.-.r,

g.

s o

k :

, y.,

<O

' s. 4 5, p?

q

. *.,L, w

%.; 2...' ;.

m**-4 s.,,4.3g y. 7... he.,.,4 >;, :

wm 5

' p> f ',-

.j., '.,

+- p.,, '.,

s.

r. m,9

-+

.... :-,s.,,

-f.f. _

J 4 4, -

1. .p9. -_.., w

', p,,, :

v m..

,....,s e

4.,g,'

T.

t. ; ',

i *,,c s

3

,,..n.=,

3,..y r ~. ".. 4 w-

~.s

~..,' g:.~ y A.k *;<.., '"+ e. 7.., y...,

4 n,

...+>

,-. 8 -

u s.

..i y:

e, i

s

. i-

-.,y

?. 3 t -.

4

• y u.,

.n, -+.,

,c.

. e. *.....

'I

- l 3

" ct... - ' i- '- '

'1

\\; "-

V"-

' " [1 i,- s

'k 'i,k..

yY /' + -,.,

.:-?

8-

[

h

.>.,. ).M. h. h pP 6 ': 1 '.j ],[ MS, A ^

"..?' '.. $ d,; y' +. -.? sf. 3 g... ['.'..l,.'Q,-) 3

(," '.'.,.

f 7

4

... ( ],-'

j,',;. [+

i *

( '.,.*.'

,,1-;, %. ' -

• ,r

- '.' - g+ g..

3. ' +

s,.

j....

... g" 4,,

s'.'

', ~, e,. -

g,.

.s,

..,. f.:}. '..,,y1,,.,;.-. G., ]

s,;,!,..

.~$' ;,ls-

...};..

L. g ;.,

.}.

r.

s.>.-

s st

.,., s.p >..~J.>,+..e y,s

., F

.s

...w.

...y(c.a, v

n

%.m,.,...

e

.,c,.-

,.ag.? g,. ii,

t

+. ',, *.

~.+.

- 4,

.A

,...-C r

,'.,. 4,'9.,,,(i,y,.j,

u w

.. ~,

f f $ _")? M

,,r, p.. ;,, 7.3.y. J. j7,-r

., lgp g"g.'6

...< i e 3,

ap.

4<

i.%.

(.,,,

y.

s,

y s

y

,. 9_.[sq,.S p g,,,* s

.+

s w

.i : - <

,. r'e,

..ct E.

J gv

. - 1

..4 i, og. e,-

..'+,

'(

('.

-g,

f.

,[. g jt 4, h, ' -

4 cy 3

.1, 93

.. '. ',,p'j

',Y djk;[;g.. h h 3, v-. [.

f, f

1. ~

f, j%.,..rde.4

.g...c..

"e

=

'w

,,+y P.

.T r h(,,1

.,. 9 s-

- g ;

g4, y 3,

• g**,=.'..,.-+

3 J,

4 <,-

.; F a

.+4

'i '

-4 w

.a

. f f-y

d.,.

, =.

.y.

4

.Y.

~

l 3,

6..

....S-.....

, y '.h', "$ h_ i - l.M..

g

.... ',,,m..

.4 l,'

a 4-c -1.,.,,. A. I. ', ;.

l.!.G l

.+

y g.-}.%;m)l+.f.'.

'W q.s- %s a,,r s

i v

_. 4 1

5

)

k @...../., '.,.,,-._

f'-

, - g, (W

~,-- -.

., g,

'S 9 f

.-f.

1, f.s

../

Foreword I

i Digests and indexes fit issuances cf the Ccmmission (CLI), the Atomic Saf:.ty and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB), the At:mic Safety and Ucensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (AU),the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions of Rulemaking are presented in this document.

Dese digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

Information elements commore to the cases heard and ruled upon are:

Case name (owner (s) of facility)

Full text reference (volume and pagination)

Issuance number issues raised by appellants legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes)

Name of facility, Docket number Subject matter ofissues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction permit, operating license,etc.)

Type ofissuance (memorandum, order, decision,etc.).

Rese information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arranged as follows:

1. Case Name Index he case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type ofissuance, docket number, issuance number,and full text reference.

2. Digests and Headers He headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows:

the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and ucen'.ing Appeal Panel (ALAB),

the Atomic Safety and ucensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (AU), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking.

He header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearing, date of issuance, and type ofissuance.

De digest is a brief narra'ive of an issue followed by the resolution of the issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance covers more,than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are designated alphabetically.

iii di

Ris index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or i

i alphanumerical arrangements-of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others, nese citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and Statutes 1

rnay have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.

4 De references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally i

followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance. Dese phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text CASE NAME INDEX i

reference.

4. Subj.ect Index ARIZON A PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, et al.

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ')RDER; Docket Nos. STN 50-529,STN 50-530; ALAB-742,18 NRC 380 (1983); LBP-83-36,18 NRC 45 (1983) j Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, Indicate the issues CINCINNATI GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ENFORCEMENT ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. { 2.206; Docket No.

j and subjects covered in the issuances. De subject headings are followed by 50-358; DD-83-i9, i8 NRC 1461 (1983) phrases that give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the OPERATING LICENSE, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-358-OL (ASLBP No.

76 31741-OL); LBP-83-58,18 NRC 640 (1983) issuances being mdexed. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, et al.

i the full text reference.

ENFORCEMENT ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R. j 2.206; Docket Nos.

50-440,50-441; DD-8317,18 NRC 1289 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMOR ANDUM; Docket Nos. 50-440-OL,50-441-OL; LBP-81-75,18

5. Facility Index NRC 1254 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 30-440-OL,50-441-OL; ALAB 736,18 NRC I65 (1983); LBP-81-38,18 NRC 61 (1983); LBP-83-46,18 NRC 218 Ris index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the (1983); LBP-83-52,18 NRC 256 (1983); LBP-83 74,18 NaC 1241 (1983); LBP-83-79,18 NRC issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing,date, type of 1400 (1983); LBP-83-80,18 NRC 1404 (1983) j issuance, issuance number,and full text rererence.

OP,ERATING LICENS,E; PARTIAL I, NIT,,IAL, DECISION; D,ocket Nos.

50-4400L, 50-441OL

,sto, y,.,1.,3,4.ot,, to,. 3

,I yac 1363,1

,3, COMMONwEALTil EDISON COMPANY OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. STN 50-454-OL, STN 50-455-OL (ASLBP No. 79-4tt 04-PE); ALAB-735,18 NRC 19 (1983); LBP-83-51,18 NRC 253 (1983)

}

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING INTERVENORS' MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT Tile QA/QC RECORD; Docket Nos. STN 50-454-OL, STN 50-455-OL (ASLBP No. 79-4ti-04 PE); LBP-83-41,18 NRC 104 (1983) l OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING STAY APPLICATION; l

Docket Nos. STN 50-454oL, STN 50-455-OL ( ASLBP No. 79-411-04-PE), LBP-83-40,18 NRC l

93 (1983) 4 l

SPENT FUEL TRANSPORTATION, DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. ( 2.206; g

j Docket Nos. 50-10,50-237,50-249; DD-83-14,18 NRC 726 0983) t h

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK 1

SPECIAL PROCEEDING; RECOMMENDATIONS TO TIIE COMMISSION; Docket Nos.

I 50-247-SP,50-286-SP (ASLBP No. SI-466-03-SP); LBP-83-68,18 NRC 8110983)

I CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY MODIFICATION ORDER AND OPERATING LICENSE; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 I

C.F.R. 2.206; Docket Nos. 50-329,50-330; DD-83-16,18 NRC 1823 (1983) l MODIFICATION ORDER AND OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; j

Docket Nos. 50-329-OM&OL,50-330-OM&OL (ASLBP Nos. 78-38943-OL, 80-429-02-SP);

{

L3P-83-50,18 NRC 242 (1981); LBP-83-53,18 NRC 282 (1983); LBP-83-64,18 NRC 766 (19836; LDP-83-70,18 NRC 1094 (1983) l SPENT FUEL POOL AMENDMENT; MEMOttANDUM; Docket No. 50-155; LBP-83-44A,18 a

NRC 211 (1983) l SPENT FUEL POOL AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-155; LBP 83-62,18 NRC 708 (1983) i SPENT FUEL POOL AMENDMENT; SUPPLEMENTARY INITIAL DECISION; Docket No.

l 50-155; LBP-83-44,18 NRC 201 (1983)

I iv

)

i a

h nr 1-

---

m

--r-=

CASE N AME INDEX CASE N AME INZ EX DAIRYLAND POWER CCOPER ATIVE NIAGARA MOllA"?K POWER CORPC.ATION, et at OPERATING LICENSE; DECISION; Docket No. 50-409, ALAB-733,18 NRC 9 (1983) l OPER ATING LICENSE PROCEEDING; MEMORANDUM AND C2 DER; Dockrt No.

DUKE POWER COMPANY 50-410-OL (ASLBP No. 83-48443-OL); LBP-83-45,18 NRC 213 (1983)

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos STN 50-491, STN NRC CONCURRENCE IN llIGil-LEVEL WASTE R EPOSITORY SAFETY GUIDELINES UNDER 50-492, STN 50-493; ALAB-745,18 NRC 746 (1983)

Tile NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT OF 1982 DUKE POWER COMPANY, et at NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY SITING; MEMORANDUM AND ORD,ER; Pub. L.97-425 OPERATING LICENSE; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-413-OL,50-414-OL Proposed 10 C.F R. Part 960; CLI-83-26,18 NRC 1839 (1983)

( ASLBP No. 81-46343-OL); LBP-33-56,18 NRC 421 (1983)

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DPERATING LICENSE; ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-413,50-414; CLI-83-31.18 NRC 1303 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-275, 50-323; J

GENER AL PUBLIC UTILITIES NUCLEAR CORPOR ATION ALAB-756,18 NRC 1340 (1983); CLI 83-27,18 NRC 1146 (1983)

CIVIL PENALTY; STATEMENT OF TiiE COMMISSION; Docket Nos. 50-289, 50-320; o ERATING IICENSE; ORDER; Docket Nos. 50 275,50-323; CLI-83-32,18 NRC 1309 (1983)

CLI-83-20,18 NRC I (1983)

PillLADELPillA ELECTRIC COMPANY j

REQUEST FOR ACTION; INTERIM DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. l 2.206; OPERATING LICENSE; SECOND SPECIAL PREllEARING CONFERENCE ORDER; Docket

{

Docket Nos. 50-289,50-320; DD-83-18,18 NRC I2% (1983)

Nos. 50-352-OL,50-353-OL; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 (1983)

SPECIAL PROCEEDING; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-320; CLI-83-24,18 POWER AUTilORITY OF Tile STATE OF NEW YORK NRC 385 (1983)

SPECIAL PROCEEDING; RECOMMENDAllONS TO Tile COMMISSION; Docket Nos.

GUIF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY, et al.

50-247-SP, 50-286-SP ( ASLBP No. 81-466-03-SP); LBP-8348,18NRC Sll (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM; Docket Nos. 50-4584)L,50-4594)L (ASLBP No.

L PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW ll AMPSillRE, et al.

82-46841-OL); LBP-83-52A,18 NRC 205 (1983)

DISQUALIFICATION; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-443-OL,50-444-OL; ilOUSTON LIGitTING AND POWER COMPANY, et al.

ALAB-748,18 NRC 1884 (1983); ALAB-749,18 NRC 1895 (1983); ALAB-751,18 NRC 1313 OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. STN 50-498-OL, STN (1983) 50-4994)L (ASLBP No.79-42147-OL); LBP-83-37,18 NRC 52 (1983); LBP-83-49,18 NRC OPERATING LICENSE; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-443 0L,53-444-OL; 239 (1983)

ALAB-734,18 NRC 11 (1983); ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (1983); ALAB 757,18 NRC 1356 LONG ISL AW LIGitTING COMPANY (19g3)

EMERGENCY PLANNING; DECISION; Docket No 50-322-OL 3; ALAB-743,18 NRC 387 SPECIAL PROCEEDING; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-4434)L, 50-444-OL; (1983)

CLI-83-23,18 NRC 311 (1983)

EMERGENCY PLANNING; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PETITION TO PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGilT COMPANY, et al.

INTERVENE OF CITIZENS FOR AN ORDERLY ENERGY POLICY,INC.; Docket No.

^

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT WITilDRAWAL; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos.

50-3224)L-3; LBP-83-42,18 NRC 112 (1983)

STN 50-522, STN 50-523 (ASLBP No. 75-27948-CP); LBP-83 78,18 NRC 1398 (1983)

EMEROENCY PLANNING; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING SUFFOLK COUNTY LOCllESTER G AS AND ELECTRIC CORPOR ATION MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM FEM A; Docket No. 50-3224)L-3, LBP-83-61,18 OPER ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No.

NRC 700 (1983) 50-2444)LA ( ASLBP No. 79-427-07-OLA); LBP-83-73,18 NRC 1231 (1983)

EMERGENCY PLANNING; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-3224)L-3; ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 1 BP-83 72,18 NRC 1224 (1983)

SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS LICENSE RENEWAL; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; OPER ATING LICENSE; PARTIAL INITIAL DECISION; Docket No. 50-3224)L; LBP-83-57,18 Docket No. 70-25 ( ASLBP No.83-488-01-ML); LBP-83-65,18 NRC 774 (1983)

NRC 445 (1983)

SACR AMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILIIY DISTRICT LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGIIT COMPANY SPECIAL PROCEEDING; DECISION; Docket No. 50-312-SP; ALAB-746,18 NRC 749 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; DECISION; Docket No. 50-3824)L; ALAB-753, la NRC 1321 (1983)

SIIIPMENTS OF lilGil-LEVEL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WASTE TilROUGil AND TO MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY ILLINOIS EMERGENCY PLANNING; INTERIM DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. ( 2.206; TR ANSPORTATION OF RADIOACTIVE M ATERIALS; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 D#t No. 50 209, DD-8315,18 NRC 738 (1983)

C.F.R. 6 2.206; ; DD-83-12,18 NRC 713 (1983)

FINANCim. FilALIFICATIONS; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-309; SOUTilERN CALIFORNI A EDISON COMPT.NY, et al.

CLI-83-21,18 NRC 157 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-361 OL,50-362-OL METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, et al.

( ASLBP No. 78 36541 OL); LBP-83-47,18 NRC 228 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-289 OPE R ATING LICENSE; ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-361-OL,50-362-OL; CL1-83-28,18 NRC 1855

( ASLBP No. 83-491444)LA) (Steam Generator Repair); LBP-83-76,18 NRC I266 (1983)

(1983)

RESTART; DECISION; Dacket No. 50-289-SP; CLI-83-22,18 NRC 299 (1983)

STATES OF TEX AS, WISCONSIN, MINNESOTA, NEVADA AND UTAll RESTART; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-289; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 327 (1983)

RULEMAKING; DENI AL OF PETITION FOR RULEMAKING; Docket No. PRM40-1; SPECIAL PROCEEDING; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-289-SP (Desi n DPRM-83-3,18 NRC 1473 (1983) l 8

Issues); ALAB-744,18 NRC 743 (1983)

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTilORITY SPECIAL PROCEEDING; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No 50-289-SP (Management CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. STN 50-553, STN Phase); ALAB-738,18 NRC 177 (1983) 50-554; ALAB-752,18 NRC I318 (1983)

J NEW YORK STATE ENERGY RESEARCil AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TEX AS UTILITIES GENER ATING COMPANY, et at

)

SPENT FUEL TRANSPORTATION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 6 2.206;"

OPERAllNG LICENSE; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. ) 2.206, Docket Nos.

i Docket No.50-20l; DD-83-!4,18 NRC 726 (1983) 50-445,50-446; DD-83-il,18 NRC 293 (1983)

I 2

3 m.

1 CASE NAME INDEX OPER ING LICENSE; MEMOR %NDUM; Docket Not 50-445,50 446; LBP-83-35,18 NRC 40 OPERATING UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50 445 50-446 8

i NR 84 (19 3 BP 83 8 18 C 1410 ( 83

]

O RA ING LICEN PART L AL DFC

'N

$0Q8NR 1,164 (1983)

DIGESTS g,

LBP-83-63,I8 NRC 759 (1983)

ISSUANCES OF Tile NUCLEAR RICULATORY COMMISSION ED IN TIAL DECISI Docket Nos. 50-445-OL,50-446-01.

(ASLBP o74

)

OP ATING EN, SPEC L REllEARING CONFERENCE ORDER; Docket Not 50-445, CLI-83-20 GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon, Units I and 2),

Tile REGENTS OF Tile UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 9

j OPERATING LICENSE RENEWAL; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER D 1he Commission authorizes the NRC staff to issue a Notice of Violation and Proposed (ASLBP No. 80-4444)5-OL); LBP-83-67,18 NRC 802 (1983)

A UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY OPERATING LICENSE, DECISION; Docket Na STN 50-483-OL; ALAB-740,18 NRC 343 the quahficahons of an individual operator and (2) failure to properly implement its operator re-

)

(1983); ALAB454,18 NRC 1333 (1983) 1 OPERATING LICENSE; INITIAL DECISION; Docket Na STN 50-4834L (ASLBP No.

CLI-83-21 M AINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY (Maine Yankee Atomic Power SI-44941-OL); LBP-83-73.18 NRC 1105 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMOR ANDUM; Docket No STN 50483-0L; ALAB-750A,18 NRC DUM AND ORDER The Commission afGrms the Director's denial of a petition seeking an order to show 1218 (1983) j A

cause why the licensee should not be ordered to discontinue operation of the Maine Yankee OPE R ATING LICENSE; MEMOR ANDUM AND OR

cket Na STN 50483OL; J

ALAB-750,18 NRC 1205 (1933) facahty for alleged financial incapabihty to operate the plant safety and dispose of spens fuel UNITED STATLS DI PARTMENT OF ENERGY, M N AGEMENT CORPOR ATION, stored and to be generated there. The Commission also decides as a matter of discretion to TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTilORITY OPERATING LICENSE; ORDER; Docket No 50-5374P; ALAB-755=

fra Gnanc difGcuhiet

! VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY P'

which these problems may have to the protection of pubhc health and safety. See Pacific Gas &

j OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; MEMOR Nn Electric C. v. State Ener8y Resources Conservation and Development Commisson,000 U.S.

50-338-OLA-1,50 3394LA I; ALAB-74I,18 NRC 37 198 )

l t W A$lilNGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM' et at 000,75 L. Ed 2d 752,767 (1983).

I CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; MEMORAND 4 -CP (ASLBP C

A showing that a licensee is undergoing financial difGculues does not by itself require f

Na 83-48542-CPA); LBP-83-59. IS NRC 7 ( 983 OPERATING LICENSE; DECISION; Docket No 50-508-OL; ALAB-747= I H 6 (198 )

safety practices have in fact occurred or are imminent would form a basis for enforcement l

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDU acpon, whethu w nm the mm cause of the fault was Gnancial j

82-47946-OL); LBP-33-66, IS NRC 780 ( 9 3 D

Proceed:ngs wdl not generally be inmututed in response to a 10 C.F.R. { 2.206 peution to l WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY There is reasonable assurance that, unut the availability of 8cologic repositories for safe, OPER ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; DECISION; Docket Nos. 50 2664LA,2301-OLA; E

1 ALAB-739.18 NRC 335 (1983)

E""*"*"'

l OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; ORDER; Docket No. 50-2664LA-2; CLI-83-29,18 thirty years beyond the caparation date of operating licenses See 48 Fed. Res. 22,730 (1983).

NRC I159 (1983)

^ ' * " "

OPER ATING LICENSE; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R-2 eket Nu inent of Energy (DOE) and provide prepayment foy waste disposal services they will ul6mately l

i 50-266,50-301; DD 8313,18 NRC 721 (1983) j SPENT FUEL TRANSPORTATION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER I Docket Nos. 50-266,50-301, DD-83-14,18 NRC 726 (1983)

Unit 1). Docket No. 50-289-SP; REST ART; September 8,1983; DECISION Upon review of the Appeal Board's decision in ALAB-698,16 NRC 1290 (1982), ad-j A

dressing emergency preparedness at TMl-1, the Commission reverses a hokhng of the Appeal i

l Board relating 'o the placement of respnembshly for making prosecuve action recommendauons to the Commonweahh of Pennsylvania, and directs that the TMI-l emergency plan provide that 1

l the responsibihty for radiological assessment and the making of protective acuan recoramenda-uons be transferred from the Emergency Director in the control room to the Emergency Support l

Director in the Emergency Operauons Facahiy (EOF) no later than one hour following the decla-I ration of an emergency. With that change and subject to certain conditions, the Commissson l

fmds emergency planning for TMI-l to be adequate.

NRC emergency planning regulations require hcensees to establish an onsite technical j

B support center (TSC) and a nearby Emergency Operanons Facihty IEOF) from which effecuve I

direchon can be given during an emergency.10 C.F.R. Part 50, Appendix E, { IV.E 8.

I 5

l f

^

^

a~m m

DIGESTS DIGESTS 1%LTNCES C TJE NIJCLEAR [ EGI LA10ltY COM1 ISSION ISSUANCES OF Tile NUCLEAR L EGULATORY COMMISSION e

C The responwbehry for radukgical amessment and the makmg of protecuve achon recom-pose of seekmg the disqualificapon of a Commissioner or alternatively, for leave to make a mendanons is to tw transferred from a semor efEcial m me control room to a sener off'acial to hmated appearance under 10 C.F R. l 2.715. In view of the Commission's denial of party status the Emerger.cy Operatons Facahty no later than one hour followmg the declaration of a Sete to the legal foundauon, the Commission summanly dismisses a second motion of the foundation Area Emergency or General Emergency-calhng for dasquahfication of the Commissioner from the proceedmg.

CLI-83-23 PUBLIC St R% ICE COMPANY OF NEW ll AMPSillRE, et al. (Scabrook S,ators Units 3

A petiten for leave to mtervene which as unumely will not be entertained by the Com-I and 2) Dothet Nos. SG-4434)L, 50-444 0L; SPECI AL PROCELDING, September 19, 1983; miss.on unlets a balancing of the factors set forth in 10 C F.R. l 2.714(a)(l) supports late MtMORANDUM AND ORDLR intervensen. These factors are:

The Commewmn decides agamst undertakms sua sponte review of the Aptol Boa:Es de-A (1) Good cause, if any, for failure to file on time.

cmon in AL AB-734 denymg an intervenor's peutum for directed certe.kanon of a hcensmg (2) The avadabihty of other means whereby the petitioner's interest will be protected.

boarJ damawal of one of its contenoons. T he Comnussen, however, takes the opportumty to (3) The catent to which the petsuoner's partecipation may reasonably be expected to assist in reatfirm its statements in Duke Power Co (Catawba Nuclear Stauon, Unsis I and 2),

developing a sound record.

CLI-83-19,17 NRC 1941 (1983), that the admissstulity of a late filed con ention must be deter.

(4) The catent to which the petiuoner's interest will be represented by enestmg parues.

mmed by balancmg all five o the factors in 10 C F R 6 2 714(at r

(5) The entent to whuh the petsuoner's participanon will broacen the issues or delay the C1183-24 GENER AL PUBLL UTILITifS CORPORATION (Thr e Mac Island Nuclear Station e

praeedans Uma 2), Dotket No. 50-320, SPECIAL PROCEEDING, September 21,1983, MEMORANDUM' Nucicar Fuel Services, Inc. (west valley Reprocessing Plant), CLI 75-4,1 NRC 273 (1975).

AND ORDI R C

la ruhng on a petapon for leave to intervene that is untimely, the Commission must The Comnussson denses a monon to quash subpoenas assued at the request of the NRC consader, in addeuon to the factors set forth an 10 C.F.R. 6 2.714(a)(1), the following facurs set A

Othe of Intestigations lOl A) to a number of mdabaduals, directmg them to appear and gave tes-forth in 10 C.F.R. l 2.714dd):

timony in connettion w:th OI A's mvestigauon of certain allegatons concerrung falsaficauon of (D The nature of the peutioner's nght under the Act to be made a party to the proceedmg.

reactor system teak rate data at TMI 2. The Commnsaon, however, orders that the subpoenas be (2) The nat.are and entent of the petitioner's property, financial, or othet interest in the made returnable m the federal Judicial district where each mdavidual resides.

proceeding B

Under sectwn 161tc) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,42 U S C. 6 220l(c), the Com-(3) The possible effect of any order which may be entered in the proceeding on the peution-mission is authorned to condui-t such invesugatons as it may deem necessary or proper to asust er's intere=t.

it in escreawng any authority proveJed an the Act and by subpoena to require any person to D

A peuuon for leave to antervene must, mter alia, set forth with particulanty the interest appear arkt testify, or to appear and produce documents, or both, ai say dewgnated place.

of the petiteoner en the proceeding, how that interest may be affecard by the results of the C

The NRC's authonty to conduct an anwesugauon under the Atomic Energy Act does not proceedmg, including the reasons why petitioner should be permitted to intervene, and the ceaw upon referral of a matect to the Department of Jusuee.

specdic aspect of the subject matter of the proceedmg as to which petiuoner wishes to mtervene.

D The NRC's pursuit or ts own cavd investigatson for civil enfortement purposes will not 10 C.F R. 6 2.714(a)(2).

a necessanly hamper the role of the Grand Jury or broaden the Government's opportumtaes for E

The burden to satisfy interventon requirements is on the petitioner,10 C.F.R. l 2.732.

cnmenal descovery, because the Grand Jury's subpoena powers are as great as, if not greater F

Judicial concepts of standmg will e c apphed in determining whether a pensioner has suffi-than, those of the NRC. See SEC v. Dresser trJusines, Inc.,628 F.2J 1368,1378 79 (D C. Cir.

cient interest in a proceeding to be entatted to intervene as a matter of nght under section 189 of 1980p (en banc), cert. demed,101 S Ct. 529 (1980).

the Atomac Energy Act of 1954. Portland General Electnc Co. (Pebble Sprmas Nuclear Plant, E

To carry out its pubhc health and safety mandate the NRC must he able to investigate Units I and 2), CLI-76-27,4 NRC 610 (1976).

matters 'ampeditmusly, regardless of whether there is a parallel crimmel anvestigation underway G

Judicial concepts of standing require a showing that (a) the action sought in a proceeding entu the same matter. See Dr. sser, abid.

ws!! cause "aruury m fact," and (b) the iruury as arguably withm the " zone of interests

• protected F

% here an NRC inwonganon is bems conducted for a lawful purpmc and the mformahon by the statutes governing the proceeding. Ibid.

sought is relevant to the insestigatioc, to stop such mvestiganon at the threshold of inquery be.

II Assertmns of broad pubhc interest in (a) regulatory matters, (b) the admmistrative cause of a parallel Grand Jury mvesuganon would render substantully imposssbic the agency's ef.

process, and (c) the development of economical energy resources do not establish the particu a-fecuve omharge of its duties of investigation. See Umsed States v. M&overn, 87 F R D. 582 rued interest necessary for participation by an andavadual or group in NRC adju scatory (1980), Umted States v. McGovern, 87 F R D 584 41980), United States v. McGovern,87 procesics. Cf., e g. Sacrra Club v. Morton,405 U.S. 727 (1972).

F R D 590 (198al I

Econormc ixeress as a ratepayer does not confer standmg in NRC hcensms proceedmst.

G H hile ordmanly civil and crimmel acteams can proceed simultaneously, a court may m its Pebble Sprmgs, supra, at 614. See also, Northern States Power Co. (Tyrone Energy Park, Unit dawrction stay civd proceedmss, postpone civd discovery or impose proteasse orders or condi-D, CLI-80-36,12 NRC 523 (1980) (separate views of Chatrman Ahearne and Commisssoner tons when required m the interests of jusuce for cuample, where a party under mdwtment for a llendrie).

=crnss otTense as required to defend a cavd or admanastrauve acuon mvolvmg the same matter.

J In Commissaon practice, a " generalized snevance" shared in substantially equal measure See Dresser, supra, 621 I 2J at 1375-76. Otherwise, "[t]he noncriminal proceedmg, af not by all or a large class of catuens wdl not result in a distmct and palpable harm suffoca to deferred. might undermme the party's Fifth Amendment pnvalege against nelf-arknmmation, port standmg. Transnuclear Inc., CLI-77 24,6 NRC 525,531 (1977),citmg Warth v.

m, espand rights of criminal discovery beyond the hnuts of I-ederal Rule of Onminal Procedure US 490 at 499 (1975).

IIHbb, cupose the bus of tre defense to the prosecuuon an advance of cnmmal trwl, or other-K Where a peuuoner does not sausfy the judecial standards for standmg, mterventon coug one presudice the case " Id at 1376 (footnote omitted).

still be allowed as a matter of discretion. A pentioner seekmg such interventica,

wever, CL1-83-25 METROPot ITAN I DisON COMPANY, et at (Three Mdc Island Nuclear Stauon should address the factors set out an Pebble Sprmgs, supra, at 614-17.

Uma 16, Dmket No. 50-289, RESTART September 28,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER' L

Pursuant to 10 C F R. 6 2.715(a), hmated appearance statements may be perrnitte at A

1he Commission demes for fadure to meet the requireiaents for late miervention the descretion of the presidmg officer, but the person admitted may not otherwise participate in t nmtson of a legal foundauon for leave to interveric urider 10 C F R. t 2.714 for the avowed pur.

proceedmg 4

7

.r-

= _,,. -

4

ISSUANCEh OF 79tE NUC1.RAR REGULATORY COMMIS$80N gSSUINCES OF TDIE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISb80N CL1-83-26 NRC CONCUZENCE IN tilGH-LEVEL CASTE CEPOSITORY SAFETY GUIDE.

C la is a well-essabhshed that 93 D. M 197 T pr is LINES UNDER THE NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT OF 1982, Pub. L 97-425, Prapaw for an oppoeng party. esa v.

10 C.F R. Part 9e&, NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY SITING; August 24,1983, MEMO.

not overturned by U a

RANDUM AND ORDER CLI-83-32 PACIFIC GA RIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, In response to a petstaon requestang the inststutaon of a notace-and-cornment rulemaking Umts I and 2), Docket os. 50-27'. 50-323; OPER ATING LICENSE; December 9,1983; A

proceedmg as' the Comnusson's statutory concurrence en the Department of Energy's G==6ha-s ORDER for Accommendahon of Sites for Nuclear Wasse Repostories contaaned in proposed 10 C.F.R.

Part 960, the Commassoon finds that there is no legal obligataan to provule such opportunity for nonce and comment on its concurrence en the guidehnet Nonetheless, the Compusson decides to provide an opportunsty to representatives of interested groups to present thear viens on the guidehnes to the C-at a pubhc meetang.

D The U. ;;'s concurrence under Sechon ll2(a) of the Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982 does not constatute a rulemakmg action under either the Atomac Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the Admuustrative Procedure Act.

Cll-83-27 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant.

Unsts I and 2), Docket Nos. 50-275, 50-323; OPERATING LICENSE; November 8,1983; MEMORANDUM ANDORDER A

Upon consulerahon of (1) the Incensee's request for psrtial reinssasement of ses low-power hcense for Unit I (suspended an CLI-SI-30,14 NRC 950 (1981)) to allow it to load fuel and per.

form pre-criticahty testmg at that unat; (2) the licensee's request for an essension of the term of ses low-power hcense; and (3) Se intervenors' request for a separate adede= nary hearing on both matters, the Cornmismon decides to reinstate the hcense to authorire fuel loading and pre-cretacahty testing and deny both hearing requests. Also, the Comaususon announces that with regard to cruscahry and low-power operahan, the license suspenson es14 continue.

CLI-83-28 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, et at (San Onofre Nuclear General-ins Stahon, Umts 2 and 3), Docket Nos. 50-361-OL, 50-362-OL; OPER ATING LICENSE; November IS,1983; ORDER 4

The Commissaon determines, pursuant to its emmediate effectiveness review under 10 C.F R. { 2.h4(f), that the Lacenang Board's resolution of the issues in LBP-83-47, IS NRC 228 (1983) related to the apphcants' comphance with 10 C.F R. f 50.47(b)(12) regarding arrange-ments for =de=8 services for members of the public, does not present the type of safety prob-l lem wtuch woukt require a s:ay of the decimon's e#cctivenest The Commission, therefore, rules l

I that the decisaan may go ento cKect.

CLI-83-29 WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit I),

I Docket No. 50-266-OLA 2; OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; November 22, 1983; l

l ORDER I

CLI-83-30 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY, et aL (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Stahon, Units I and 2). Docket Nos. 50445,50 446; OPERATING LICENSE; November 29, 1983; ORDER A

The Commisson dismasses for mootness its grant of review of ALAB-714,17 NRC 36 (1983), and vacates ALAB-714 and an underlying Licenung Board orders and decisions ordering the staN to disclose the identaties of endaviduals interviewed in the course of a particular investigation.

CLI-83-31 DUKE POWER COMPANY, et al (Catawba Nuclear Stahon, Units I and 2) Docket Not 50-413,50414; OPERATING LICENSE; December 6,1983; ORDER A

The Commissaon denies the apphcant's request for stay of an Appeal Board order that madified a Licensma Board's order allowing Intervenor's counsel limited access to apphe=an's employce-witnemes.

8 Under Upjohn Co v. United States,449 U.S. 383 (1981), aa employer may under ap-a propnate circumstances arcat cornmunscahons from employees to corporate counel as privileged under the attorney-chent privilege. That does not mean, however, that every employee frotn whorn a privileged communscation es obtained is thereby a "chent" represented by corporate counsel, or a " party" to any pending legal dispuses for purposes of ABA Dascaphnary Rule 7-104.

8 9

i

e 4

i

(

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS D4!RYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE (La Crosse Boihng Water Reactor). Docket ALAB-733 I

No 50-409; OPERATING LICENSE; July 13,1983; DECISION The Appeal Board in this consolidated proceeding (involving, inter alia, the conversion A

of the long standing La Crosse provisional hcense to a full-term operstmg license) affirms, sua sponte, three Licensing Board decisions-LBP-817,13 NRC 257 (1981); LBP-82-58, I6 NRC j

512 (1982); and LBP-83-23,17 NRC 655 (1983).

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW ll AMPSillRE, et al. (Seabrook Station, Units AL AB-734 I

I and 2), Dncket Nos. 50-443-OL,50-4444L; OPERATING l.ICENSE; July 19,1983; MEMO-RANDUM AND ORDER The Appeal Board demes an intervenor's petibon for directed cerufication of a May ll, A

1983 Licensmg Board ruhng granting summary disposition against one ofintervenor's contentions an alus operating hcense proceedmg.

Inscriocutory appellate review of a licensing board's ruhng will not be granted absent a B

showing shas the ruhng (1) is not only legally erroneous but, additionally, ** affect lsl the basic structure of the proceeding in a pervasive or unusual manner," or (2) threatens the pehhoner with **immediate and senous irreparable impact which, as a practical matter, couki not be alle-l viated by a later appeal." Pubhc Service Co. of Indiana (Marble 11:11 Nuclear Generating Station, I

Units I and 2), ALAB 405,5 NRC 1190,1l92 (1977L An opposition to a directed certification petshon should include at least some discussion

)

C l

of the petitioner's claim of Licensing Board error. Ilow comprehensive the discussion of the merits need be will depend upon the totahty of the circumstances of the pasticular case. Where

{

the Licensing Board has summarily disposed of a principal contention of a party on a subject f

having as much potenhal safety significance as does quahty assurance, the respondents to the pe-j tihon should treat the ments in reasonable detad.

The mere fact that legal error may have occurred tielow does not justify interlocutory ap-j D

pellate review in the teeth of the long-standmg articulated Commission puticy generally disfavor-i ing such review. See 10 C.F.R. 2.730(fL llouston Lighting & Power Co. ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generatmg Stahon, Unit No 1), ALAB-635,13 NRC 309,31011 (1981).

AL AB-735 COMMONWEALTil EDISON COMPANY (Byron Nuclear Power Stanon, Units I and 2), Docket Nos. STN 50-454-OL, STN 50-455-OL; OPERATING LICENSE; July 27, 1983; i

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Appeal Board dismisses the NRC staff's appeal from, and denies its afternative

)

A motion for directed cerufscation of, the Licensing Board's unpubbshed July I,1983 memoran-dum and order in which the Board, inter alia, directed the staff to present evidence that the staff asserts would require it to disclose information about confidential invesugations that could result in their compromise.

B Almost without exception, an appeal board will undertake discretionary interlocutory review only where the rulms below either (l) threatened the party adversely affected by it with immediate and serious irreparable impact which, as a prachcal matter, could not be alleviated by a later appeal or (2) affected the basic structure of the proceedmg in a pervasive or unusual manner. Pubhc Service Co. of Indiana (Marble 11:11 Nuclear Generstmg Station, Units I and 2),

ALAB-405,5 NRC i190, i192 (1977L C

Queshons of fact are not susceptible of resolution on the basis of nothing nwre than the generalized representations of counsel who are unequipped to attess on the basis of their own per-sonal knowledge to the accuracy of the representations. See, e s., Charles River Pask "A" Inc.

v. Department of Ilousing and Urban Develapment 519 F.2d 935,939 (D.C. Cir.1975). See t

Il e

---

vm-, - - - _ _.,., _, _ _, _

DiGES TS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATO%IIC SA'ETY sN3 LICENSING APPEAL BOi_ DS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC:" AFETY AN O LICENSING APPEAL BOARD!

a also Cohea v. Massachusetts Bay Tran.cortanon Authority, ei47 F 1d 209, 213 84, (1st Cir.

the strength of a balancing of c11 fiv3 of the late ir,tervDation factors set forth in that section.

1981) kes v Umted States,652 Fil I (7th Cir.198 8). Cf. f ed R. Civ. P. 564e),10 C F R.

CLI-8 R

!8 is ucd unless a finding is made that there is reasonable assurarwe that adequate protecuve measures can aM M k e 6 m e d a @@d D

In the abserwe of evalence to sewe n

%i.cf of a risk of breach, a twenwns board may 4

emergency.10 C.F R. t 50.47(al(IL assume a protecuve order will be oiseyc : He.:.un Lightmg & Power Co ( Allens Creek Nuclear Both notification time and preparation time are now considered to be components of Genersung Stauon, Un la, ALAS-Sh, dr W.' 377'practwe permits the immediate appeal of evacuam um Mun udr 6 I d WMGMU M M 400 (1979)

G E

The " collateral order doctrine" in federal p

p re r in u orders that "Gnally determme claims of nght separable from, and collatcral to, nghts asserted in non and Evaluatwn of RaMgical Emegency a

able 2 Secuon

.B. and Figure 2; and the achon, too important to be demed review and too independent of the cause itself to require Nuclear Power Plants" Uanuary 1980), at Appe that appellate conwderanon be deferred until the whole case is adjudwated Cohen v Beneficug NUREG/CR-2504, " CLEAR (Calculates Logical Evacuation A espo Industnal Loan Corn,337 U.S 541,546 (1949).

portauon Network Model for the Caiculation of Evacumuon Time Esumates, AL A B-736 Cl FVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, et al. (Perry Nuclear Power ll An arguinent that future laugam may k d

Plant, Umts I and 2), Dacket Nos. 50-440-OL, 50-441-OL; OPER ATING LICENSE; August certincation. See Pennsylvama Power & Light Co. ( usquehan cam E ct S tion, n ts 1 24,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER and 2), ALAB 641,13 NRC 550 (1981); llouston Lightmg ower A

The Appeal Board dismisses, as an impermissible interlwutory appeal. the intervenor's Generaung Station, Umt No.1), ALAB-635,13 NRC 309,3 0 (198.

eaceptions to the Licensms Board's grant of an NRC staff monon for sum. nary dispowuon on ALAB-738 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, et a one of a number of consennons in the proceedmg.

Umt 1), Docket No. 50-289-SP (Management ase B

Appeals from twenwns board orders that do not chmmate a party to a s'roceedmg or das.

1983, MEMOR ANM M NU l anter enors to reopen the record in the pose of a major segment of the case - such as a gunt of summary dispuwuon - are interlocu_

A Upan considerauon of the monons of seve tory and must await the issuance cf the smual decnson (or partul imtial decmont Car emnau management phase of this proceedms, the Appea g

Gis & Electric Co. (W lham II. Zimmer Stanon), AL AB-633,13 NRC 94 (19sti); If ouston they deal with certain allegauons concernmg lea rate i

Lighung & Power Co ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generstmg Stanon, Umt No.1), ALAft-o29,13 Licensing Board for further hearing NRC 75, 77 n.2 (1981); Toledo Ednon Co. (Dms-Besse Nuclear Power Stauon), ALAB-300,2 B

A monon to reopen a record must sausfy a triparnte test NRC 752,758 (1975)

Does it address sismficant safety or environmental issues?

g C

The only procedural vehicle by which a party may seek review ofinterlocutory matters is been reached had the newl) proffered matenal been considered iniually? Pacife Gas and Ele t a request for directed certification. The esercise of the appeal boa:J's omreuunarv authonty to Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-gr:nt directed cernficanon, however, is reserved for those importarit hcensms board sc! mas that, See Kansas Gas and Electric Co (Wolf Creek Generstmg Station, Uma atnent immedute appellate review, threaten a party with senous erreparable har,n or servasively NRC 320,338 (1978); Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont ec affect the tusic structure of the proceeding. See, e s., Cleveland Liectnc Illummaung Co. (Perry Station), ALAB-138,6 AFC 520,52) (1973).

The proponent of a monon to reopen a record bears a heavy butden. Wolf Creek, supra, Nuclear Power Plant, Uruts I and 2), ALAB-706,16 NRC 3754,1756 (1982L C

ALA%737 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSillRE, et al. (Scabrook Sta: ion, Umts 7 NRC at 338 nI ef Justice does not I and 2), Docket Nos. 50-443-OL, 50-444 OL; OPER ATING LICENSE; August 26, 1983, D

The pendency of a criminal investigation by the Depar MEMORANDUM AND ORDER necessanly preclude other types of inquiry into the same ' natter y A

The Appeal Board demes petiuons for directed certification of a Licenwns Board order Industnes, Inc.,628 F.2d 1368 (D C, Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. den

,449 U S 3 198 (LBP-82-32A,17 NRC 1370 (1983)) granting parual sumnury dispowuon m apphcant's favor on Metropohtan Ednon Co. (Three Mae Island Nuclear Stauon, Umt N 724, 729-30 (1980) two contennons dealms with evacuat on ume estimates.

A matter may be of such gravity that a motion to reopen may be granted notwithstanding B

Under 10 C F R. 6 2.7186) and j 2185(b), appeal boards have the power to direct the E

cerufwauon of legal nsues raned m proceedings pendmg before ! cnung boards. Eaceptional car.

that it might have been presente<* carher. Vermont Yankee su a,

cumstances must he demonstrated, however, before they will exercne that authoney. Pubhc Serv-F Commissmn pidacy recosmies that ongoirig ice Co of New II.impshire (Seabrook Stapon, Umts ! and 2), A L AB-271, i NRC 478,433 ngs that anv Ive sa aner ca"

, g publ s

e st a ry mform mn.48 Fed.

Reg. 36,358 (1983)

C An appeal board wiu undertake interlocutory review, en its discretion, where the ruimg The stalTs commumcahon of the results of its reviews, through public filings served on below either (1) threatens the party adversely affected by it with immedute and serious irrepara.

G ble impact which, as a pracucal matter, could not be allevuted by a laser appeal or (2) affects all parues and the adjudwatory boards, does not constitute an ex parte the base structure of the proceedmg in a pervasive or unusual manner. F'ublic Service Co. of in, 11 All parties, including the staff, are obhged to ring any is Juna (Marble 11:11 Nuclear Generaung Stauon, Units I and 2), AL AB-405,5 NRC 3190,1892 the boards' auennon Tennessee Vadey AutW bm W (1777L

3) ALAB-677,15 NRC 1387,1394 (1982),

an ca ur I a hc e,

D Commasson's regulatens direct that contentions be faled in advance of a prehearms l

The unumely provision of sigmficant information is an m conference.10 C F R. i 2.714(bL character, parucularly if it is found to constitute a materia E

Under 10 C.F R. { 2.714(a), soul cause may caist for a late-filed contennon if it (1) is and Power Co (North Anna Power Stanon, Umts I and 2), CLI 76-,

wholly dependent upcm the content of a particular document; (2) could not therefore be ad.

(1976L v".nced wuh any degree of specificity in advance of the public avadability of that document;and (3) is tendered with the requisite degree of promptness once that document comes into existence and is accesuble for pubhc exammahon. The contenuon, however, is amenable to rejecuon on 12 g3 J

-~

~

cm

IJHs L313 1550ANCES C Tile ATO%IIC SAFETY AND LICENhlNG APPEAL. BOI.RDS ISSUANCES OF TIIF. ATOMIC S FE AN LICENSING APPEAL BOAT DS e

s

, 0 01(LA h, g p D

The use of ofGcially noticeable material is unobjectionable in proper circumstances.10 gp 3 A g

e e C F.R. 6 2.743(i). See, e s., Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (Cobah-60 Storage T e Appeal toard afGrms the Licenwng Board's authortaaten of a twense amendment Facdity), ALAB482,16 NRC 150,154 n.3 (1982). Interested parues, however "must have an 4

repair degraded sic 4m generator tubes by sleewmg elTecuve chance to respond to crucial facts

• Carson Products Co. v. Cahfano,594 F.2d 453,459 99 oca i (5th Cir.1979). See also Administrative Procedure Act,( 7(d),5 U.S C. { 556(c).

B The C Ul P cts e governsng appchte briefs are not mere mccues, American Weldmg Society (AWS) Code requirements simply constitute conservative rather, they we e af ed i

• n5 Of *H parties would be E

na by thme holding opposmg views and guidelmes, weh exceptens permitted.

spread fulfy upon she rewrd m r runn a to fuihtate our ulumate es4Iuation of the comperms contentions. Disregard of the Rules frus_

F A decismnmaking body must confront the facts and legal arguments presented by the par-nd burdens rather than awsts the adjudscator's IJA Penns)lvams ucs and aruculate the reasons for its conclusions on disputed issues, i c., take "a 'hard look' at s

Power and Lyht C

$usque nna Sicam Flectnc Staten, Umts I and 2), AL AB 693,16 Ngp the sahent problems." Pubhc Service Co. of New Itampshire (Seabrook Staimn, Umts I and 2),

ALAB 422,6 NRC 33,41 (1977), alPd, CLI 78-1,7 NRC I (1978), alt'd sub nom. New En-9g g NRC 473,476 (fg7 )

Ud"I Un'" I and 2), Al AB-270, 3 gland Coahtion on Nuclear Popuuon v. NRC,582 F.2J 87 (1st Cir.1978); Greater Boston Tele-vision Corp v. FCC,444 F.2d 841,851 (D C. Cir.1970), cert. demed,403 U.S. 923 (1971).

C M ubt cpu s addressed and the precise porhons of he re orJ r h upon m support of the assertum of error 10 C F R. s 2.762(4); Wis.

G A licensmg board decisaon need not refer individually to every proposed Gmhns as long as a sufTsciently informs a party of the disposition of its contentions. Seabrook, supra,6 NRC at g

p tant Umt D, AL AB 696.16 NRC 3245,1255 r

(1982), Pubhc Ser Elec r nd G em 41.

uclear Generatmg Station. Umt I),

AL AB-650,14 NRC 43 49 50 (gg80, aff'd sub nom. Township of Lower Alloways Cieck y' 11 The followmg technical issues are discussed: Quahty assurance program for pg 9ruce,.lectric and G,as Co.,687 F.2d 732 (3d Cir.1982) construction, lioneycombing of the reactor buildmg base mat; Somscopic enammation of the n a hcense amendment proceeding, a Iwensms board has only hmued junsdiction.

base mat; Embedded plates (embeds), Adequacy of weldmg (manual and machme) of studs to heanng only mmfar as those inues are wnhm the scope of m4Hers embeds; WelJing in accordance wdh apphcable codes; SA-358 Pipms-American Society of Me-it us won s no ate of hearms on the twensms actmn. Portland General Electric chamcal Engmeers ( ASME) matenal specificauon for a type of welded stainless steel pipe greater outhned in the C m ASME g

• ^

9 N C 87, 289 n 6 (1979); Pubhc Service Co. of Indi.

than eight inches in diameter (Weld defect and its repair and testmg); SA-312 Piping:

speciGcalmn for both seamless and welded stamless steel pipe (llydrostauc testmg, Leak before an4 iM4 b e lidt er Generatmg Staton, Units I and 2) ALAB-336, 3 NRC 167 170 71 break, Design hoop stress, ASME Code requirements); Centerline lack-of-penetration (CLP):

ommonwealth Ednon Co. (Zion Stanon Unos I and 2), AL AB.616,12 N' C 4 9' 3088'tudinal pipe weldmg defect (Ultrasonic exammation, Effect on pipe strength, Effect of arc e

R L

The misalignment); Weldmg deGciencies in pipmg subassembhes.

"'* 8ud 5ponte, "'any Gnal dispmumn of a Ixeriwns VIRGINIA ELECIRIC AND POWER COMPANY (North Anna Power Station, Umts i proceedmg th the Safety or enuronm nde upon substarnise determmahons of signdicant A L AB-741 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-338-OLA 1, 50-3394)LA.l; opt R ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT;

#*' ( "'"' h* S*C8 N u'8c8' Gener4tmg Stauon)

L B6 5

'8 8 398 3 quou's Washinst n Pubhc Power September 15,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Appeal Board denies the apphcant's monon for directed certification of an interlocu-Supply System (WPPSS huttcar P'roject No. 2), At AB-571,10 NRC 687,692 (1979)

A sory ruhng of the Licensing Board directmg emploration of the health and safety aspects of spent p

dm generator tube repaar by sleeving.

M transpwtauon at a hcense amchnt hang W aWW @ u whM m M Iddy current t tn f

gener4W tube f4 dure (wngle and n

muluptel. I c4k.before-brea operatuig kenses fw k hh Arma MHy wM wM aubnn d m m th W M crackuy ne u

Al ^? T40 UNON tI!CTRIC Can Call way Plant Umt D, Dutket No. STN 50-483 0L.

from another of us facdines-Opposamn to a directed ceruficahon peuuon should include some discussion of the peti-OPL R ATING LICE NSE, September 14,1983 DECISION B

rd alTirms the Lisenwns Board's pernal mshal deciwon, LSP 82-309, I6 uoner's claim of heensing board error. Pubhc Service Co. of New llampshire (Seabrook Stanon, eAP al Unas I and 2), ALAB-734,18 NRC ll,14 n.4 (1983).

" 3" C n ml c niennons, m which the The mere fact that legal error may have occurred in an interlocutory licensing board Iwenung Board hound at he a

n an I breakdown in quahty assurance C

n defects LJ been remedsed and that there ruling does not per se jusufy daccted ceneficanon. See Seabrook, ALAB-734, supra,18 NRC at procedures, the the var id was reasonable anuranse i the C

• y plant c uld be operaled safely 15, citing flouston Lightmg & Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Generaung Station, Unit No.

1), %L AB 635,13 NRC 309,310-11 (1981); 10 C.F.R. 2.730(f).

B Neuhe he 85 8**"

C nW Ibc Comnuwon's implement-Although generally precludmg meerlocutory appeals, Secuon 2.730(() of 10 C.F.R. does ers regulanons e8 e'nonstrauon of error-free construction What they require is simply D

hilow a hcensmg board to refer a ruhng to an appeal board. The appeal board need not, however,

,g c and wiH be operated without en-accept the referral. In decphng whether to do so, the appeal board apphes essentially the same dangering the pubhc 5'IC'F 2 U S C-H ll3)(d), 2232(a), 10 C.F R test as it untares in acung upon directed certification requests Gled under Sechon 2.7186). See t 50 5744H3m) Sce power Re46to' Desclopment Ce v. Insern.nlumal Umon 367 U S 396' Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nuclear Station, Units I and 2), ALAB-687,16 NRC 460, 464

^ "h " * * "* """ C'"" "*I"' S f P'** Y'nkee Atomic Power Stanon)'

(1982), vacated in part on other grounds, CLI-83-19,17 NRC 1041 (1983),and cases there cited.

AL AB.161 o AI le 3

'e o*er, Inc. v. NRC,524 The Commission's 1981 Statement of Policy on Conduct of Licensmg Proceedings, F 2J 1291 (D C Cir 19[5p E

s r hana on premely filed proposed findms;. without CLI-88-8,13 NRC 452, 456, does not call for a marked relamahon of the Marble lhH standarJ:

C 4 br t h 8

meanmgful a gume t rather, it simply czhorts the hcensms boards to put before the appeal board legal or pnhcy ques-

"sd na ssmes, as of hule value m ap-nons that,in their judgment, are "signincant" and requae prompt appcHate resoluuon.

pehte reuew Pubhc Ser e le car Generating Stauon, Unit p The fact that the error of a licensing board may lead to delay and increased expense is enn u AL AB-650,14 NRC 43, 50 (1931),4tTd sub nom Township of Lower Alloways Creek,, pu' I F

3,,

g g 8g gids(,o,687 F 2J 73213d Car 1982)-

not a controllmg consideration in favor of interlocutory review Cleveland Electric illummating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units I a id 2), ALAB-675,15 NRC 1805, Ill) 14 0982),

14 15

DIGESTS 1%U3CLS OF Tile CTOMIC S AFETY LND LICENSING f PPEAL BO ARDS ISSUANCES OF T1 E ATOMIC S AI ETY f ND LICENSING APPEAL BOAT DS cismg Penns>Ivansa Power A Laght Co (Susquehanna steam Electric Station, Uruts I and 21 in addrewns the thar-3 lateness factor of 10 C F ll 12.7148.a)(D the calent to stuch the E

ALAS 441,13 NRC 550,552 0981L See also Pubhc Servare Co of Nc= llampsture (Scabrook tiuoner's partacipauon might reawnably be expected to assut Li Jewelopmg a sound record -

.tatwn, Um s I and 2), ALAB 737,18 NBC 168,176 n.12 (1983).

pehuoner "shouM set out math as much particulanty as posuble the precise ame,s at plans to AL AB-742 ARilON A PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, et al (Palo "crde Nuclear Generaung cover, identify its prospectsve witnesses, and summanze their proposed test M8sW Stanon, Umts I and 3), Docket Nos. STN 50-529, STN 50-530. OPER ATING LICENSE; Po.ca & Light Co (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unas I and 2), ALAB-September 19,1983, ME MOR ANDUM AND ORDER 1730 (1982), cums South Carolina Electric and Gas Co (Vsrgd C. Summer Nuclear Stanon, The Appeal Board denses intervenor's pennon for detected certJkanon of the Lacenung Umt II ALAB-462,13 NRC 888,894 0980,afrd sub pom. F. <eeld Umted Acuan v. NRC, A

Boarf s ruhngs relatens to the adequacy of the environmentel ampact statements for the Palo 679 F.2d 26l (D C Cir.1982); Detroit Ed, son Co (Greenwood L.

gy Center, Units 2 a Verde facahty and stay of those rukngs ALAg_476,7 NRC 759,764 0978).

B Inserlocutury appettase reues of heensang board orJets as disfavored and edt be underte-The fifth and final factor of 10 C F R. { 2 734(a)(3) - potenual for delay - is also g F

ken as a dmretmnary mairer only,a the most compelhng circumstances.10 C.F R. 2.730(0, immeme importance in the overall balancing process. See, e s., Greenwood, ALAB-476, su,

Pubhc Serene Co of New flampshire (Scabror4 Staten, Umts I and 2), ALAB.271, 8 NRC 7 NRC at 76l42; Virginia Electric and Power Co. North Anna Station Units an 478, 483 86 (1975), Pubhc Ser=we Co. of Indiana (Marble tidl Nuclear Generaung Statson, ALAB-289,2 hpc 395,400 (1975).

Umts I and 2), ALABA05,5 NRC lI90,1192 (1977).

A late intervenor may be required to take the proceeding as it finds it.

,g G

O~

An appeal board =dl exercase its directed certa 6cahon authority only upon a clear and Sunces, Inc. (West Valley Reprocesung Plant),CLI-75-4,1 NRC '73,276 0975) conwn6mg showing that the hcenwns board ruhng under attack cather: (1) threatens the party AL AB-744 METROPOLITAN LDISON COMPANY, et al. (Three le I n o

adversely affected by it with ammediate and serious erreparable empact ahwh, as a practscal Unit I), Docket No. 50-289-SP (Design issues); SPECIAL P matter, couiJ not be allenated by a later appeal er (2) atiects the bauc structure of the proceed-MEMORANDUM AND ORDER I

g ans an a pervauve or unna al matter. Pubhc Service Co. of Indiana (Marble ildt Nuclear The Appeal Board demes an antervenor's request for reconadersuon og its rgg,

A Generaung St.taon, Umts I and 2), ALAlb405,5 NRC II90,1192 (1977)-

ALAB-729,17 NRC 814 (1983),aflirming the Lacenwng Board's deternunateon that the issue D

The policy empressed by the Commessaan m its 19st Staaement of Pohey on Conduct of environmental quahncanon of safety.related equipment must be resolved outside the adjudicatory La6enung Prosecengs, CLI SI 8,13 NRC 452,456 so the effect that, a board shoukt promptly comest refer or certisy a ugnaficant legal or pohcy questson to the Atomas Safety and Lacensing Appea:

ALAB.745 DUKE POWLR COMPANY (Cherokee Nuclear Stat.on, Umts I,2 and 3), Docket Nos.

doord or the Commaswo a, was not entended so twing about a snarked relasanon of the Marble STN 50-491, STN 50-492, STN $0493, CONSTRUCTION PLRMIT; October.

Hal standard Virginea Elecir.c and Power Co. (North Anna Poect Susson, Units I anJ 2),

RANDUM AND ORDLR ALAB-741,18 NRC 371,375 (1933).

The Appeal Board grants tL apphcant's monon to terminate the Board's jur sdicuan A

AL A*> 743 LONG ISLAND LIGliTING COMPANY (Shoreharn Nuclear *omer Station, Unit 0, over the ungle remumns issue pending in this constructson permet proceeding ulxan twan Docket Na 54 3224)L-3 (Emergency Planning). OPER ATING LICENSE, September 29,1983' vised that the apphcant had carweiled all three umas of the facihty and surre pr DECblON J construcuon permas to the Director of the NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Resu anon.

A In this appeal under le C F R. i 2 714a from the Licensing Board's memorandum and SACRAMENTO MUNICIP AL UllLITY DISTRK'T) (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generatang ALAB g order (LBP 8342. IS NRC 132 (1983)) denying a peanson fut leave so enterver's en thas operal-Stauon), Docket No. 50 312-SP, SPECIAL PROCEEDING, October 24,1983, ans ascense proceedmg of a peurmner she supports the grant of the license, the Appeal Board af-A Upun reccept of the addstmnal m64matson a had requested, the Anca Drms the reside below on the groenad of the pention's lateness, escheems ruhng (as dad the its sua sponte rewcw of the record and affirms the Licensing Board's initial decison {Lgp g i2 j

Licensms Boardt on the queshons of the peutmner's standang to entervene and ats abihty 10 13 NRC 557 (198D). En this specui proceeding, subject to the impositson of scense c snect the tests for dmreuonary anterventen-requanns addamnal radmgraphac mspections of certain high pressure snjecuon nonles.

B in pesung upon an unumely sneervensson penison, the Latenang Board as to conwJet and B

Techmtal specifwatsons are to be reserved for those manen as to M N E balance the following five facst*5 of ngiJ conditions or limitatens upon reactor operation as deemed necessary to obviate he Posm-h) Good canne, et any, for imlure to fde on eser*

tahty of an abnormal stuauon or event givmg rise to an immediate threas to pubhc a

(m> The avadatzhty of other means ehereby the petsuoner's saterest ed! be protected.

safety. Portland General t lectne Co (Trojan Nuclear Plant), AL AB-531,9 NRC 26,

l (sm) The essent so =ha6h the peta.oner's partwapet.on may reasonatdy be espected so assist in (1979). Sec 47 Fed Reg 13,369 (1982)

)

developing a sound res;ord C

The folkswma te6hmcal issues are dncussed. Radmgraphic examinaten g g pr,,,,,,

l av >

The essent to stuch tSe petatsoner's anserest mall be represented by cassunt parues stuccuo't (llPD rmules, Aumihary feedwater ( AFW) system schabihty.

(*)

The essent to thuh the petdsoner's pertuigutaon edl Iwoeden the suues or delay the AL AB 747 WASillNGTON PUBilC POWER SUPPLY SYSil'M, et a.

Proteedang No. 3), Dusket No. 50-508-OL, OPERATING LICENSE, November 15, I 8,

10 C F R t 2 714taHli The Appeal Board gacates the Lacenung Board's grant of a late filed petitaon to intervene A

C Opensons that, an the curcumstances of the partacular case, are essentaally advescry in and renunJs the mauer to the La6cnung Board for the purpose of regmtmg a hanhe w g nature shoulJ be rewrved (af given as att) for assues of desnunstrabic recurring emportance. See the entent to eluoh interveruon by the petitioner may reasorably be especte Tennesace Varacy Authority IIIsrtadle N.wyer Plants Uness I A, 2A, IB and 288. ALAB-467, opmg a sound record.

7 NaC 459,4a3 (19718 The five factors governing the acceptance of a iate4iled entervention pelation are as 8

l D

la the absence ed good cause for tard.ncss sa neckans antervensson, "a pettuoner must follo*s niaie a *6cer4icihng showing en the other four factors lof IO C F R. t 2 784(aHIII en order so (i) Good cause, af any, for fadure to file on ume justafy late enserventaon ' Detroit Edison Co (Larue terms Atomac Power Plant Unit 2),

(nD The avadstuhry of other means whereby the petitioner's anterest w Pro ALAB-707,16 NRC 1760,1765 (1982), and cases there ciscJ (m) The enient so ehach the peutoner s parucipaten snay reasona y pc developing a sound recorJ 16 17 U

J

---w

-DIGtM S

% 4%CES OF THE CTO%IRC S4FETV AND LICENSING APPE AL SoggDS DIGESTS twUAhCES OF Tile f TOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSFNG APPEAL BOARDS The aces en.hmh the pet.t.oner'c anacress mit be scoresensed by eaanting pernes

)

M The na obch the pet.a.oact's partarpatwa me8 becaJen the emises er delay the another party Puget SuisaJ Powes aaJ L aght Co (Skagit Nuclear Po=ct Propect, Umts I and 2),

AL 48-5%, 30 hRC 30,32-33 0979) A party sequesung d =guahricauon er recmal may attempt 10 C F R 7 714iast I so estabbsh by referesse so a judge's overad conduct that a persesave cismate of prepadece esists C

The kcamig wm W w ww se determemag whether to grant as maumely sa wheth a fair bosang cannot be obtasard by the movant.

,asergens,e p g g

""8

3. WM I ALA& M NBLIC MM WWW W W HAME % et at &aW 5tanoa, Umu SRC 2'),2TS 4975, I and 29 Du6ket Nos So-443-OL, 50-444-OL, DISQU ALIFICATION, November 28. 1983 D

One * * ***** ** **erunn a h6caung boar (s grant of a la's M** to entervene has a MLMOR ANDUM AND ORDER mm MHy b est4Mah maph that the Incamag A

The Appeal Board affirms the decesson by a Licensang Board judge denying a escond M*

hrJ m.she psst e

!y he caraansaanwes bearing uppe the naouon for recusal or dnquahfacance of the padge in chas operaung hcemse prateedmg r.e laicaem i m sE M the e m 6'"'

• • • l *I the fema. la order to decree that S

The wandard for disquahrnation, enunciated Iy the Comunasaca na licusion Lighams I bu f um be MrsmaJed that a sedeh eased coaM reat no other remalg.

ad Pueer Co (South Tesas Prosect Unsas I 2),CLI-82-9. 85 NRC 3363 (1982),as that a Oas-E A hj.

kg authocar se am Mp t-asary board a support of a poestaan. =un qualdymg bias muns arenarily saem frosa an estransdacul auurce, rather them a judge's conduct

• "8 as pee i e, has a stear professaunal othga-durens the course of a proceeding.

saan se miam the hwd d the 87 See h

talOB of the C

Scation 2 704tc) e410 C F R. regewes a hecaung board pedge who demacs a monom for ASA Moses Roles of Pn4c ma Ces g,g d"'4WaM'cauun s4 k jmtge m refer the amtma m the Mausam er Appeal Bwd F

A petame ms-le C y R_ y yo, 's au8 as ^3" subirasuse in parteuponen se as ad-D Mutaoss for dsaguahrmauce or recusal asust be feed an a tunety fastuun - e a, once the su F"o% """acJ omal the grams er drasal ab unsaae el an applaataca for as oper#

misma geweeg rase to su6h a claam as avadabic to the mosant. Consumers Power Co.

'M*b"3 'h"' U"d* I '"d 28 A'*8-101,6 AFC 60, 63 (1973),Marcus v. Dwector, OtTece of O

A hae [ "* merum shoukt set furth as the pelataca, enth as south partacu-Workers' Compensatwa Prograras,548 F.2d 1044.1058 (D C. Cr 1976). See alao Puget Sound g,,,,

~ ~~= -m - L"""n" P'"~ " ';*A' s"t "ad G t;".";' ' ". ~"' "

'~M*"'8'""'~#"*"'"'2*"*'*"""

rs I2 IN tl982L cams Sumamer, ALAS-642,13 hpC Sst.

E T $ deaicantraic taas flow ng from entrapadical sources, a party muss adcatJy a personal g g, gg.

aned Ass.on v NBC 679 F 2J 268 (D C. Car 1932), oca,,,,

.-=,ction, retazaoastup er entrasudmaal nacident obch accounts for the alleged personal ansmus E4ana Ca 8% Emergy Ceaser. Unses 2 and 39, AL ASWe. 7 h3C y$g 764 0978) of the pedge la re IBM Corp,618 F 2d 923. 928 (2J Cw.1980).

g y

'"**"" **888 the Mth talar es le C F R 2 7 4ta) en hether, by I.has lane, the F

Rutsass, conduct, or remarks in response to maatters thas arne durms aJansaastrauwe pro-y se he==r rsson of the pra6 teens thas meinu cecengs are aus entrapadmaal AL AS-748,18 NRC 1888 (1983).

8 a

aus ha.e tres pnema w r ing beca suech Of Lang Inlaams Lashanas Ca Camcaport AL As 750 lihloN ELECTRIC COMPAhY (Caheay Plana. Uma I). Docket No STN 50-4h3 OL; ha, y,,, %, y " g *

^L*

• 2 hE'"II* 650 a 25 (1975)

Ort R A TING 110t NSE, November 29,1983 MfMORANDUM ANDORDtR I

'** * '* '$* *** "*# # * '"*d '***'d as amportant se A

Tscasms a petaeum for recon =rJeranon of an Appeal Board decanon as a snouon to reopen the g

• " 8'**aer amputaans a cases en =hc% the grams 8he record, the Arpeal Board dense, the snot oa fut fadure to sausfactordy demonstrate that the a, aem,g og,g,,% g

- -~ ~r - - ~, e.. y wa,mg$cerca.

-,,,tms.a,_m.m.. uc,y.

m a.tr es. res.d..a t se -

me_e,,,,c,, m,,,

"'8 car das.

ash I asus 23, ALAB-433,5 htC 1438, a

To penady a reopenmg of the record, a pennomer must sausfy a inparute sess as follows

1422II97, 8 3 8 35 'he m*.ua umely? (2p Does is address ugnificant safety or cavroamenus immes? 0)

'ALAsa Mighs a ddlercas res=It have beca reuhed had the acety proffered matenal beca cosmodered H

et at (Seatteok Saatana. Umses ty? Meer potasan EJamm Co (Th ee Mae Islaat Nuclear Stauan. Uma NA I). ALAB-738 I

2 Daches 4

8C^ T

• N******* 3 0 I'3 3-

=n MEMOR ANDO4 AND ORDER is hRC ITF, ISO 09433. quusms Paar.c Gas and Electrac Co (Dutdo Canyon Naicas Power g

A SM an arJer by a Lucansas Buard Dalse demyang a pers,*s== a=

Mans. Unsts I ama 21, AL AB-598, il NRC 376. 879 (1980L boas er the appearance of par 1*alaty C

partaes in as appchte proceedmg are e% gazed so submar so the Appeat Board new enfor-gg, 8 e g

• • • "'"8 "*8 of a enember of the Coenmessaan a, mag og e, 9,,,,,

....aa tha es relevana mad missenal to the matiers besng adjudscated Tennesmee Valley Authoney 80'U*"5 I ef'? b IC8' U*ste, Unau 1,2 ashi Ja, ALAS 477. 85 hRC I387,139411982).

[8"'"**I 8' '** "'***8ai ratkr than by the Commenessa er the fut boar u a rt,"'has uuMs a-.. hem, no.soo,e.afarm.u.a m ~ A-ai.ea,d..e y

- C-m-- C-,en s.~r P P.a.r. U I and 2,, n, 8%,,

D

',,c,,,

,,,,d,. Hounaan Listasas & Pe.cz Co (sown Temas Prwyect. Um.ts I amt 2)*

shouiJ 4. no ecrease the stumane decneum out regard to snateruhay as for the decessommaker.

15 NRC 477, g33 g,g;p,,,,.4 am naher gne n3 82 9. 85 hRC 1363 0932)-

raa the p. rues Con-sacas Po=ct Co- (Maks:d Pleas. Umts I and II. ALA8498. le NRC 397 AgS4 r- - -c

- m m.m.tra.e % as a the,cdera, 9,4 u,82, Hoi-san Lighams amt Power Ca (Scesen Tesas Proseca, t, E

t he responwhhty for the emarun.hua of n fety sasues as divided between the (ommes-a g,

""* ' *d3"'8*'atory boards aaJ ses staff Ocaerally speaking, at the operahng h6 case Mage the D

T an en-cMaos m the scaeral rate shas ers% atdf*As been manna be es%

sole of the boards as knused to resulssas contestcJ matters property placed en ensue en a c-ase.

g,g,g, Dh nel comawns demonsarancs persam.e bees and prepnt.6e Per**uwe bees and C***^t 5 4ws. Ce of New Yosh Ha&an Puent, Umts 1. 2 amt 3), ALAB-319, 3 NRC 188.

m 189 90 41976) 'Ibe Mati taust ama c decessoas en a wide rasige of safety matters aut plaa$ an gm"'eives mace them ssages, glares anJ a6 eels" se "anannonal aughests I.ug.t.oa. am, m a,,,- res._,.hd.y to s pom.cm, the safety of ma...ouai.,p a-g

-a - -em,-ase and -- rem.r,s b, t,e,a, gem a,

,,a,

le6entees on an erigtafig baui g

^ a"""Waraum er secanal

-m.n.= muna ahe he base.d me a amos g g 6maE*s n=a sistsa, One '

seth the ' a C-er receawal M a pm3se le prosect the % g I

is I

19 l

l I

85KreCES OF TIst CTee84CSAMTV ANS LICDeSt%G APPEAL 304kS6 N ESTS e

IS60A;.CES OF Tite CTOh00C SAFFTY AND IJCEPeSING APPEAL SOARSS F

A party shas onbes en raase he=hh smicey as es,

-.a==a=a bus a =maa= se &a se an a semeng ++<- may Sam a erguest wash she D.rasw of Nascar gen,s e Reguesessa F

A party sechang mary hp-saam has the burden sipoveag the aheemse of a mAsmi moder le CF R D6 mhang she Dwernor an ammause a skue<anar paceedhas se aMress shame n.ne es eassac fus, an oppumas party's gadure to sespond a thess not necessardy fatal.

s asnees Dessess Eense Ca (Earme Ferms Assaue Pa.cr Plant. Uma 2), AL ASOl',16 hBC G

Appeal boards are methoue parhaa to ceander a party's request se scopen the secord 37he, IMF (19823 en a mue specifkally auremed se am carber h thes has hara=* h'asswely Isant ALAB 750h UNION ELECTRIC CO64PANY (Casamay Flama. Uma II Dates Na STN $4-443484 See Puhenc Sernce Co e( ta&ana (Marble Hdi Nuclear Generauss Stanon Unas I and 2),

OPERATING LICENSE, De6 ember 9,1983, MEMOR ANDI)M ALAS.533,9 NRC 268,2h2 (1979), Pubhc Scresce Ca of New Hasapelare (Seatreek 6-aa=

A The Appeal $ seed :_;. ' - _ ans psewaeus enemarandens despaag the eagerveners*

Umsta 8 and 2), ALAB-513,8 NRC 694,695-96 (1978). See peacrany Vergsmaa Elecuac and l

asopemas massan (ALAS-754. IB NBC 5205), an sesen,ase as a lesser dreas the =aph =asaggess-Poect Ca (North Amma Nedear Power 5samaa Umas I and 2), ALAS-551,9 NRC 704 (1979L l

8's puanMr "*r'asaneas bf the Appeal Sssard af as as%3ams mm-*4 carher by the appin-H Ueduc w.s,.enewspaper arusles en anseeses enh no apparent connechon se the facdoty cams as maassam essh as -

mader r -

- de act provide a leganmaase lasses on whsch to anske an evaleessasy funding er j

ALAS-758 PUBLIC SERWE COMPANY OF HEW HAMP5 HIRE, es al (ScalmenA L*a'a=. Unses as reopen a record I and 27 Dahet Nea 50-443-OL, 50-4444L; Dt5QU ALIFICATION, Deccanher 6,1983 I

The failuosas sechascal assnees are escussed Crachang and muesture is concrete ME6ANKMA2 M R ALAS.754 UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY (Callaway Plant, Uma 1), Docket No. STN 50-4834L; A

The Appeal Seard desses a shard ma*=a= sechang the recunst er ^ -- ' ' - - as she Ort RATING LICENSE; December 9,1983; DECISION Chamrasan es she 8 -mag Smart The Appeal Seard IsaJs that the messes a name-ely and fur-A The Appeal Soord adIsras en sue spones sevsew the Liccamas Board's socied partaalim-sker shas, as as she earber secanal==== hy asher persack she aNeged esaanpses of bias **=rh*'

hat en-en thss operahng lacease paceeshag whsch =~paae the Saase of Mtssouri's deserane-seemuned fruen suences

=ar she p-tae ser destasenarased pervauve taas amana that the dessrshesnost of patassiasme sailede and emneruruons for as use as not accessary for O

Or&aaracy. hq==hfynes taas sness saem fream as esar.p.an.a saussce medens shcre as a e,.y.,s, emergency pim

-^-

es perva e ness la-Listums and Pe.er Ca 8ta-ah Tesas Prosect. Umsts I B

The NRC's emnerseacy plaamag regA*- requwe that a range of protective actions he O 2),CU S24. 55 NRC l3h3 41982t developed 5er the pubhc as the area surrouadas a nuclear power plaat. See 10 C.F R.

ALAS 752 TEhht$5EE VALLEY AUTHORfTY (Phyps Bend Nacerar Plama, pasas I saJ 2).

% 504hbHl06 DeLaet N ast 5YN 50-553, SYN 54-554, CONSTRUCTION PtaMIT, December h,1963; C

There as as eapress mandsee maJer esecreency plananag regulanons that protective actica MDeORANDOM ANDORDER

=== h==te the asse ci r?

-vc drugst lit and MUREG-0654 FEMA-REP-8, Rev. 8.

A The Appeal Seard gramas the appiscams's meteos se seransmase the Boar (s parseducases D

GeneraNy the C

- banc3 sts decsansa segardaag the ahraary of emergency pleas meer she eagle m====ay mue pesmhas as thss camarigsson perust peneceng, based apan the en a revaew of the fan & ass and detersumatsons made by the Federal Esmergency Management taahay's <=== es s===

I Agency (F EM A) 10 C F.R. 6 50 47(a)(2).

O Parmes as asveal teard pe==en taps have an ethganum se keep she beard andermed af as ALAS-755 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, PROJECT MAN AGEMENT W=== deschapanemus skat anay hear en Jesmanas sa the pra mame emmewee VaRey Autho

CORPORATION, TENNFSSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (Chach Rsver Breeder Reacaer Plant),

say (Besens Ferry Nh=. Plant. Umas I,2 and 30, ALAS 477, 85 NRC 1347,1388 (1982).

Docket No. 50-537CP, OPERATING LICENSE; December 35,1983; ORDER ALAB-713 LOCISIAN h POSER AND LIGHT COMPANY (Waserford sacan Elecersc Samanos.

A After the ekscoatsmasance of fundeng for this facdesy by Congress, the Appeal Board in Uma 3), Dushet ha 50'3824L.; OPE R ATING LICE N5E, Desember 9,1983; DECISION thes conseructaan pernus proceeding, upon mohon of the sneervenors, termuneses as moot all ap-A The Appeat BossJ sa skes operaung hcemme possedias deroes as act noe pre enhap a us-pellaec posce& ass and vacases the Lacemmag Board partsal uutsal decasaos paving the way for as-miscans wfety coaccre a messen se reopen she record on an esase relaanas se baseshas craks=

sanance of a housed work authoraraham (LWAL Revocaban of the LWA is left to the Lscensing l

.se=es a sessams =ma= en scopra en the sparrganas masse h-el a tech c(psrubstson, and-Board Io descranane that condstacas, af any, are aceded to amehorate the envercamerital impcts en sua spanse sevire, afEsans she 8 =

mp Beard's pernal sassaal decessoa en the aJequacy of ap-of une preparataca acuvisset I

sdesama's emergency staan g bradnere 3

Appeat boards tsadehonally scraunate these procee&ngs on the ground of moosness and D

A mesman to scopen muuss saanfy she faGuweg three-piers sese (Il is the messom tassely?

vacase the decevons sander review when a project as canceBed Bosson Edison Ca (Pilgrum Nucle.

42) Does se aJJress sage #ecama safety der cavarassmenarsD asames' 434 M2ght a ddlerens sesult er Power Stataon, Uses 2), ALAS 4%,14 NRC %5 (1981); Rochester Gas and Electrs Corp.

have been reached had the newly pretiered smaserial teen censidered ensanany? Messap As==

($serkng Power Proseca, Nuclear Umst No I), ALAB 596, il NRC 367 (1980L Cf. Puget Sound Edison Ca (Three Male twaad Nuclear Sns-*= Uma Na ll, ALAS-738, le NRC 177,100 Power and Laght Co. (Skaast Nuclear Power Prosect Unsts I and 2), CLI-80-34,12 NRC 407 t1983p, and caes cascat i1980L C

The poseances of a== no scopes bears a heavy hurdea Km== Gas and Electrac Ca ALAB-7% PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, (Wolf Csert Gearranas Saas% Uma Na 13. ALAB-462,7 NRC 320,334 (19783-Umsts I and 2) Docket Nos. 50-275-OL, 50-323-OL; OPER ATING LICENSE; December 19, D

A sesccesfua ansvans meusa pwomac esth ses mas== to scopen share than here aRegataans 1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER er sumpte nesba==-- a= et are -

Pactic Gas and Elecinc Ca (Diabae Canyon Nuclear A

The Appeai Boasd sets out the reasons for sts carher order denying the motions of the in.

Pooer Plans, Umas I and 23, CLI-88-5,13 NRC 3el, h3 (1988). Any siepportang saaternal servenors and the Governor of Calsfornsa to reopen the record on the assue of construchon atuali-sanouaJ be pavedeis wat the -a-a= se sinas the test for seepenas can be meanesfally appesed' ty assurance as thes operasang Iscense procee&ng.

E A party stat seeks se rasse a new, preveously snaconsensed assue throusin a metaos to 3

Proponeans of a mossoa so reopen the record se a incensang proceeding carry a heavy respes the record unusa satisfy both the reopensas creacna and the lase seascames cracria set burden Kansas Gas and Electnc Ca (Wolf Creek Generahng Stahon. Uma No.1). ALAB-462, forth se le C F R. t 2 784(a)(IL Pactic Gas and Elecanc Ca (Diabao Canyon Nu6 tear Powee 7 NRC 320,338 (1978)

Plans, Umes I and 21, CLI 82-39,16 NRC 1782,1784-85 t1982)

C A snotaos so reopen the record an an operatang lacense proceeding, so succeed, must be esmely presented, addressed to a agmfacant safety or environmental issue and must estabbsh that a differcas res dt wouki have beca reached ensually had the material submstted in support of the motion beca conudered. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear 28 25 l._.______

81 l-4

'N l

N B"4 m

C r

lq lF'-

i<

n lr' :1r-

- - q p-l q

s I

m I DIGESTS

• ISSUAMlS OF TIIE ATO% llc SAFETY AND LICEN5tNG APPEAL ROkBDS Power St. tion). ALAB.8 38, 6 AEC 520, 523 (1973), Georgia Power Co ( Alvin W. Vogtle i.

Smicar Plant Unsas I and 2), AL AB-291,2 NRC 404,409 (1975),Nuthern InJaana Pubiac Ser-vue Co. (Ba411y Genermung Stauon, Nalear-1), AL AB-227. 8 AFC 416c.418 (19746 See also PacsGs Gas and Electric Ca IDiablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), AL AB-598, il NRC 676,879 (1980) 3 D

Perfecuan in piant construction and the facihty construcuan quahry assurance program as

'I not a preconJatson for a hcsase undst rem I*te 9tuf=w Energy Act or the Commisson's DIGESTS i

regulations. What as requi;; rad **d t. scanona'de anurece that the plans, as budt. as able to ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS s

and will be operated withous endangerms the publas health and safety 42 U S C. 2133(dl,

l 2232(a),10 C F R. 50 57(a)(3)h), Power Reactor Developrnent Co v laternauonal Union, 367 M

U S 396,407 (39till; Mame Yankee Asomac Power Co. (Mame Yankee Atomic Power Stanon),

4 ALAB461,6 AEC 100),1004 (1973),af!'d sub nom. Ciuzens for Safe Power v. NRC,524 F.2J 1791 (D C. Cur 1975L LBP-83-33 TEX AS UTILITIES GENER ATING COMPANY, et al. (Comanche Peak Sicam Electric j

E To descrmane what consututes a "ugnusant safety issue" for reopenmg mcuans predicat-Staten, Units I and 21, Docket Nos. 50-445, 50-446; OPERATING LICENSE; July 6,1983;

]

~

or that there has been a breakJown of the quahty assurance program sufkaent to rasse legatamate mental conditions that occur m the contrinment durms a loss-of<colant accident, the stresses

)l cd on alleged deficsencies in an apphcant's construction quala'y awmance program, the new evi-MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dence must estabbsh either that uncorrecsed construction errors endanger safe plant operahon, A

The Licensms Board rules that although pipe supports expand when heated by environ-l j

doubt as to the plant's capabshty of being operated safely See Unaon Electric Co. (Caltaway that occur within those supports due to thermal stress are not required either by the staff guid-p Plant, Uma II ALAB-740. IS NRC 34),346 (1983).

ance or apphcable code provisions to be considered in des.grung the supports. Ilowever,interve-4 AL AB-757 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW II AMP 51ilRE. et al. (Scabrook Stanon, Umts nors are not barred from entroducing evidence that failure to cons &r enermal stress would lead q

l and 26, Docket Nos. 50-443-OL, 50-444-OL; OPER ATING LICENSE; December 20, 1983; to dewsn instabihties that are unacceptable under the Commasson's general design criteria. Al-mi A

The Appeal Board in this operaung hcense proceedmg dechnes to reconsider its carher of<oolant accident conditions will place stress on its end points. These stresses on anchors, con-l MEMORANDUM AND ORDER though thermal stress need not be considered, the espansson of a pipe support under loss-I demal of an micrvenor's motion requesung recusal by a Licensang Board judge on the ground of crete and pipes must be conwdered durms the design of these systerns.

"f beat B

Stress that would be placed on supports and pipes by the expansion of pipe supports h

B A claim for dnquahficanon must be raned as soon as practscable after a party has rea-under LOCA cond4uons must be considered in the design of those supports and pipes. Ilowever, aj sonable cause to beheve that grounds for disquahfication esist. Marcus v. Director, Orke of under applicable staff guidance and industry codes, design considerauon need not be given to "l

Workers' Compensanon Programs, 548 F.2d 1044,1051 (D C. Cir.1976L See also Umted States thermal stress that occurs within the pipe supports because the expansion of the support is

v. Parrack,542 F.2J 381,390 (7th Cer.1976L constramed. Intervenors snay, however, introduca evidence that casts doubt on the stabPity of in-t C

The posture of a proceedmg may be consulered an evalualms the tamchness of the filang dividual supports as a result of thermal stress not having been considered in the design of those e

M of a motion for disquahfication. Smith v. Danyo,585 F.2d 83 (3J Car 1978).

supports C

When the American Society of Mechamcal Engineer's ( ASME) Ne is apphcable to a nuclear plant pursuant to Commaswon *cgulations, the Board must interpret the Code to deter-mine its appiscability to the heensing proceedmg. The general principle of the Code that only ASME m y enterpret its Code is not bmd ng on hcensing boards.

D lt as appropriate fut a hcensing board to i.iterpret a Regulatory Guide that applies an e

ASME Code secuon. To the extent that the Guide apphes a Code provision in a setung for which at was not origmally entended, interpretauon of the Guide does not constitute a Board in-terpretanon of a Code provision.

E The followmg technical issues are discussed: Thermal stress in pipe supports (ur. der j

LOCA condauons), LOCA Ohermal stress in pipe supports), Free-end displacement, Expansion stresses, Self-balancing stress, Des 4gn cond4hons (meaning under the ASME Code), Repetitive f j

loads, Elasuc acuan, Shakedown mio clasuc action.

~

LBP-83-34 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY, et al (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units I and 21. Docket Nos. 50-445, 50-446; OPERATING LICENSE; July 6,1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A

The Licensms Board holds that a decision of the Secretary of Labor, concerning discharge i

of a wlusticblower by a major contractor of the applicant,is binding on the applicant by operanon of the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Accordmgly, facts necessary to the Secretary's decision and relevant to the hcensing.ction are bmdmg on the Licensing Board.

B There is sufficient idenuty of interest between apphcant and a mgor contractor that an administrative decisaon by the Secretary of Labor against the contractor is bindmg against the apphcant.

LBP-83 35 TEXAS UTILITIES GENER ATING COMPANY, et al (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Umts I and 2) Docket Nos. 50-445, 50-446; OPERATING LICENSE; July 6,1983; MEMORANDUM A

The Licensms Board responds to a Commission request by stating that it wdl no longer pursue evidence concerning the idenuty of mdsviduals who cooperated with a staff investiganon 22 j

13 t

i

'n. p.L.

a, L, 3 ( ;. r p 3 3

.y 3..- (. e,

~

DIGESTS DIGESTS BSSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY tX) LICENSING BOARD 6 ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AN3 LICENSING DOARD6 but that ses record as antemplete concerneng whether or not appisant has discouraged the Glens LDP-83-38 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, et at (Perry Niaclear Power of me<onfortnance or denciency reports. The Board dewanates a parucipaung pany &Sw Plant. Uneis I and 2), Docket NosL 50-440OL,50-4414)L; OPERATING LICENSE; July 82, of Texas, to play an arnportant role in pursuing he msue. It Wso asks the Cum

's Sh 1983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER play a role to anwesugatmg the problem.

• "**"8

'*I""'""

B Under circumstances where pubhc doubt has been cast on the efG6acy of an invesugatson opuaung tecme pmceedens that wmld control whether a not it was appropnate to imue a conducted by the StaN of the Commesseon, it as appropriate to appeens an anterested State as lead

"*8 #

interwem for the purpose of conducung dncovery related na a poruon of an admatted consention amervems must Grst raise an admus,ble contente that cans imo questen apphcant's'alminy to to which the questioped staN evestesauon was addresmed. The saterested state snay also pantsee rece ve and care la spent fuel sa e It ads that no such usue has been rannd, and the Ahng questaans concerneng weave welding sad downhdi mekhns, questions within the knowledge of of an appimasson for a special nuclear saatenal license does not gave intervenors a fresh oppor-wunewes to whnh it edt be spea& sag

• N "*

LSP-83-36 ARilONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, et at IPalo Verde Nudcar Generating

'""U"*f***9"**""*''***

came was assue. onsequenth, the Board desnes k aJmissen d a consenuon cmcenes the Stauon, Units 2 and 3), Docket Nos. STN 50-529-OL, STN 50-5340L (ASLBP Na 80-447-Specsal Nuclear Maaenal Rense.

i Cl4L), OPER ATING LICENSE; July ll,198L MEMORANOUM AND ORDta A Board in an operaung Isense case has junsdic%n om properh raned cemens and B

i A

The Licensing Board derues monons by West Valley Agricultural Protection Coumed.

may emer mders cacenung a related specul nuckar malenal licenas apphcahon paiding that Inc. which ask the Board so rule that the NRC Staff's Final Environmental Staacment (FES) the orders are related to the adensated contenuons. However, the 6hng of an apphcation for a spe-q does not sneet the requarements of the Nanonal Envronmental Pohcy Act (NEPA) and that the ciel nuclear neaterkd hcense does not cuate an opponumsy to ide fresh conteniens about maners reopened proceedmg on Palo Verde Unats 2 and 3 be cominued untd a supplemental environ-that have previcessly been part of the pubhc record.

mental staaement as pubinhed.

C A late-Gled content on concern ng issuance o a special nuclear masenal hcense must 5

Defects en an FES can be cured subsequens to its assuance by the receipt of additenal meet all the criteria for a late-Gled contenuon, incluihns a showing of good cause for late Ghng.

eveJence.

j if the questaons rasse=1 were already available in the record prior 10 the f; ling of the apphcaten C

A licensms board decisaon based on the evidenuary record before at shall be deemed so for a special neaclear naaserial license, the niing of the applicaten does not by itself create good 1

modsfy the f ES.

cause h asse Ghng.

D West Valley's requess that a suppleme'il to the FES-OL be prepared is beyond the D

It is sufEcsent that an environsaentalimpact usasement is prepared concerning the grant-Board's junsdiction. New England Power Co. (NEP, Unats I and 2), LSP-78-9,7 NRC 271,279 ing of an operating hcense; it is not necessary to prepare a separate statement concermns the re-(1978).

celPt of unitradaated fuel or of other plant components, on the assumption that receipt of the E

At the least, at must be deternuned that there is sagna6 cant new aaformation before the mnsmnent wdl not be followed by campicuon d the Idant. A singic enWronmentalimped state-need for a suppdemental enwwonmental statement can anse Warm Synns Ta4 Force v. Gnbide snent covenns the enum wnstructen and operauon d the plant includes enlun is the canp>

423 Fld 1017,1023-3619ut Cir.1981). A resolution of the signeGcance of the aHegedly nussang acnt steps invM an the project mformation ami ses need to be circulated in a supplemental envronmental statement sness awast LSP-83-39 PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY (Limerick Generstmg Station, Units i and the outcome of a hearus R Docket Not M.352% 50-35% OPERAN WENSE; July E m SWm WE-j LSP-83-37 llOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY, et at (South Temas Project Uans I CIAL PREHEARING CONFERENCE ORDER 4

and 2) Deckes Nos. STN 50-493-OL, STN 50-4990L ( ASL BP No. 4423 47-OL; O'PERAT-in a special prehearing conference order, the Licensang Board rules on the admissetnhty A

ING LICENSE; July 14,1933; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER of pendsng safety contenteons, admittang alwee contenuens and escluding nineteen. Before ad-j The Lacensing Board denses a mogen by an satervenor to add a new 6nancial quahrwa-dressms the admissetshly of specific contenuons, the Board concludes that safety conecahons A

tions consennon so the proceeding. The Board also dechnes ao resnrnmend to the Comnsession,

• • • mas the probabehstic riseL assessment (FRA) donc for Linierick would be admissable only 1

pursuant so 10 C.F R. ) 2.758. he the regulataan protub ung c,-neraten d the Gnancial ques-if shey alleged that the PRA edentafied a particular design problem for Limenck. The Board afwatens of regulated utdanes he waaved for tlus proceedmg.

leaves open the quenhon of law PR A contentens should be hugatoi when they relate to the Na-a B

Financui quahticatens so " construct" a facday is not - and was not pnot en the 1982 honal Environsnental Pohey Act,42 U.S C. i 4332, review of plant operanons.

annendment so the rule governang consederation of an arphcant's quahGcations - a sul9ect open S

Good cause for the untsmely Ghng of a consenhon based on a newly avadable document j

se conuderstaan at the operaung bcense stage of review.

naay be lost by manmg to see what action another party wdl take in reachon to the uocument C

Gaven a proceedmg me was manalty notwed in 1973 and for M the SW Phg When a docuenent >ccomes avadatic, contenuons based upon it must be filed promgety C

Conference was held early en 1979, any contentions filed en 1983 would perforce be untamely no preserve good cause for en untamely contenteon although the document may be incomplete.

l and could be adamteed only upon a balancmg of the factors luned en 10 C F R. I 2.714(a)(I).

la the contest of health and safety (as appened to envwonmental) essues, htigahon related D

Atahry no conenbute so the record as relevant to the admissabeluy ofIs*-fded --

D so the choice of methodology used to develop the PRA would not he prontable. However, of the j

(as disungunhed from heefy contenteons, where the facsors en IO C F R. ( 2.714(d are not FRA -&*s a particular desagn probice wah the plant, that may be latagated.

appiacable).

" Postulated accidents" as used in General Design Critenon 64 as a term of art meaning i

E

}

E The sole groumi for obtaamag an escepuon or wasver to a Commemoon regidauon as anat desaga bests accadents.

i specut circumstances with respect to the subsect maner of the partsular proceedmg are such h A consenhon wluch merely tecnes unrelesed adverse Endmss in reports of quahty assur-F applicanon of the rule or regulation (or provision thercoO would not serve the purposes for ance enspecteas and audds perfornied by the StaK and Applicant is not admissable.

• hsch the rule or regulaten was adopted. le C.F.R. ( 2.758(b). Unusanal and compcIhas circune, LBP-33-40 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY (Byron Nuclear Power Stanon, Umts I and stances must be shown.

1

~

2), Docket Nos. STN 50-454-OL, STN 50-455 OL ( ASLSP No. 79-4tl44-PE); OPERATING F

The funowing sechnwat usue as encussed. Financial QuahGcatmas.

LICENSE; July 26,1983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING STAY APPLICATION A

The Laceasing Board denas the NRC Stalrs apphcanon for a siay pendmg appeal from a

[

part of a Board order direcung the parues to present a full evalentiary showmg and esplaneten y

1 25

.. J

DIGESTS DIGESTS th50 ANCES OF THE ATOh81C SAFETY AND LICEN54NG BOARDS R$50ANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSIPeG SOARD6 of certaan sawesagas cas ns subsequent remspectmas relased to the quakey assurance program of Inservenors. the tearJ will exaaune carefully the laservenors' pleadengs for detaal of factual anal-one of ApW=ds consracam ysss as one of the factors in descronamns Imu sermusty the masser es vected by Intervenurs D

The craena for a

hether se grant a star pendmg appeal have beca ce&Ged in E

The fonowing techar=8 neue is escussed. Imaegrae d Hot Funcisonal Testmg.

I 2.788(c) of the Ce====-a's Rules of Practme (10 C F R-6 2.788(en.

LSP-83-42 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power $ sauce, Unis I),

C la as apprornase for a party seeking a star penens appeal of a becamas board order to pt-Dockes No 50-3224)L4, EMERGENCY PLANNING; July 28,198); MEMOR ANDUM AND tataos the bcessang board farst. Florida Poect and Light Co (St. Lucie Nuclear Poess Plant.

ORDER DENYING PETITION TO INTERVENE OF CITIZENS FOR AN ORDERLY Uma 21, ALAS 404,5 NRC 4185,1886 a.2 (19778. Ilomever, a is mano apprornate for a hcemans ENsRGY POLICY,INC, tml se place relatsvety htsae.eight on the first cracria for aemming a stay pendsas appeal, A

The Liccasang Board demes a petason to intervene in the separase emergency plaanmg E8. *hether the mewmg party has a strong showing that se as hkely to prevad ce the moras of hearms sa thes procee&ng my a petstioner supportang Appeacant's offnate emergency plan and the appeat.

favoring issuance of an operaung hecase to Apphcant. The Board finds that the pesanon was D

la canadenes whether the NRC Staff war be arreparabey angured by as order to produce aaanmely, as I'ht a balancuag of factors pursuant so 10 C.F.R. 5 2.714(a)(In requares that at be relevant &cusments even thaeagh germans to a pendmg inspectaan er savesng2naa. the hceaams demed.

Iwerd cannot detersuae the apphcabihty of the "sevenagasory record

• esempues so the MRC B

When a acw laccasang board is establashed to conduct a separate heanas in an ongoing of the FrecJose ad Informataca Act,10 C F R. 6 2.790(a)(7), wahout at least a en-operatsas hcense proceeding, the estabbshment of such a acw Board does not constause a new cassaan of alte vanous prosections afforded by 6 2.744 of the (*a=====ma=*s Rides of Practice (10 Notace of licanng, the samehness of petstacas to intervene wdl be evaluated in hght of the santial CF SL 6 2.7441-nouce of heanns.

E The Staaf may not mad wraDy and summardy declare that the "amvesugaeory records" es-C Where a hcessas board Gnds that a auntsmely petama to seiervene is inescusably late, empoos die C F R. 2.790(al(7)l apphes so mformstnam in sts possessaon. Pursuact to 10 C F.K.

that a mouM agmGcantly delay the procee&ng af admened. that the petsuoner has made no show-2.744(c) this determamahos must be saade by the press &s4 edTscer after emamamation of the ang of sts abshty to snake a substantaal contnbutaan to the record, and that the petitaoner's inscrest saferma'==

is aJequasely represcased by another party to the proceedms, the pentaan edl be densed notwith.

F Although 6 2.744 % as terms refers caly to the productaan of NRC documents, is also standans the fact that there are no other sneans available to protect petatsomer's anterest.10 sets the frame =ert for providmg protectosa ser NRC Staff se*=aay where disclosure wound C.F.R 6 2.714(a)(H.

have the potennal to threases the pubhc haahh and sategy.

LBP-83 41 TEXAS UTILITIES GENER ATING COMPANY, et al. (Comanche Peak 5 cam Electric G

Wah sespect to safeguards afor=as= the Cees =wa= bas dechoed to peraus any pre-Stateos Umsts I and 2), Docket Nos. 50-445-OL, 50-4464)L ( A5LBP No. 79-410-060);

sumptaos that a party ohe has desmoestrased standing se a procee&ng cannot be trussed sah OPERATING LICENSE; July 29,1983; PROPOSED INITIAL DECISION seasmve snfor== nam A

A party that does not file regiered Gndangs as sa default on the related assues. The Board H

If there are persons she maght be privy to seemtsve saformataos who are aos asay emanume those issues to determane whether they shouM be raised by it sua sposte; truarworthy, that fact can be made known escluavely for the hceansne board's conssderasson in otherune, the assues are excluded froen the case.

r"

. ehic proescuan under the varaous awmaa avadable to 6he board. The fact that per.

B Raaher than assuing an instmal deerace se as fmeshed form, a Board snay chuone so obtain sons employed by Apphcaat er ses contractors maas be trussed to receive infor==naa em a qual-cuanments from parties ca a " proposed" desman before et makes as fmat choece. Thas is yartac-my

'* maue es aself relevant se the tusue esm3 must be provided to the board adarly appropnase when two of the Board's saembers were sewertly appeented and the record was I

%here the NRC Staff has faded to show that the provanwas of 10 C.F R. l 1744(c) de compics.

not proomas sufraaent prosecuen for the inforsaation ordered to be dnclosed by the board, it has C

The following techancal issues are discussed. Quahty assurance; Quahty assurance, faded se de=amnate the puseassal for arreparable esgury thaa moedd pestify the grammag of ats ap-mesmber of saapessors; Quahty assurance, operaneoaal, Non<onformance reports, number of; par=== for a stay of the board's ardes pendmg appeat Esmergency plannsng. Rock overbreak; Dental concrete; Limestone (susceptabshay so fracture 3

If, eith respect se an uncesarleted easpectson and sawcearuma an esplanassoa of the during tdastmal; Settic.nent crack, concrete; Concrete settlement crack; Morale,Iow; Water nature of the a5egatana and a desenpesos of the evidence no far gathered can put a maner to rest stops, emproper la6 kang; Polar crane, gaps is rads, Discouragement of non-conformance reports, or *** a need for further aegiury, the lucenang board has the responsabdsty to iaguare lueely liarassment, quahty assentance inspectors, Surface preparation, near whate blast. Mantraum seem the agVacave and relevance as the remims anguanes to the ensues se the pr-ma.ap roughness, sacet substrate; Pasat, force-curing with smoking hessers; Wehag; WeMas, heat LSP-83-43 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMrANY (Byron Nuclear Power $sanon. Umsts I and numbers only on structural sacambers, Welding, weave-beadans. Wekkes, downhdi, Wekhag.

28 Desket Nost SYN 50-454-Ot., STN $4455-OL (ASLDP No.79-411 44PE). OPER ATING heatsas of weld rods; Wenng, plug =cidaag inspecima, Weklang. control of wekhas rods; LICENSE July 28, 1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR5*

Torque Seal, Quahty assurance, sanerpretateos of Torque $ cal by easpecsors; Traccatnhty of MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE QA/QC RECORD matersals, Torque watues, procedures. Quenching welds; Flange bolt-up knats, inspection l

A The Lacensmg Board dennes laterveners' =as a= as reopes the secord for the purpaae of delayed. Papang, wall thackness. Papsag cold synagang. Hydrogen contrat; Recombeners, electracal, ATWS. Salem Unit I analogy; Baron ansection tank, dcIction of, Departure from i

suceiving certase anspectaus repara l

D A smotaca se reopes the reserJ must be assnely, saust dennamorase that agasfacaat new

== lease budmg rano (D*dBRL Borom crystals.

ev dence af a safety e.estaest enses and that the new esadence aught materieDy aNect the aus.

LBP 83-44 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY (Bag Rock Poemt Plant). Docket No. 50-155; ra-e ef the procee&as.

SPENT IUEL POOL AMENDMENT; August I,1983, SUPPLEMENTARY INITIAL.

C w here laserveaurnh> act seek a general reopeases of the evalenhary record, but only se DECISION A

The La: casing Board determones that apphcaat has comphed with the Board's carher uu-suppicment the secord =wh certasa sanpectaan reports. at us rea&ly pam so settle the maner hat decessue (LDP-82 77,16 NRC 1996 II982H concernens emergency planning The Board also by ceanader=as tIse factual responses of the Applacant and Staff to descramene af the agasncans dnsJes that et es not accessary to conduct a hearing before snakang thas deterr mation.

safety problem actuaDy c='e=8 and, es so. thether at has beca resulwed 8

Apphcaat sansGed the Board that at had desacastrated sufficient comphante wah the ap-D a~=== cadh snessoa ao reopen the record saunt be evakaascal en ses secrets, and B-c=a==*

the Apphcaat's burJea of proof and the Staff's evernshe r-n-

"~ give stroce leverage to phcable esacrgency planaens requiressents of the Casaniassaos for the purpose of a proceedens concerasng a bremse amendment so sapend a spent fuel puot.

26 27 l

__._._Dm_______...___

DIGESTS DIGESTS ISSUANCRS OF TME LTOMIC SAFRTY AND LICRNSING BOARDS ISSUf.MES OF THE ATOMIC 5 45ETV AND 1s*TNhl%G B(CDS ses conJence sa a controlled orgamzed fashnas and should awass an apprornais opportunny to eahn evidence rather thaa hear documents se dnha and dreheL C

A hearing as ans regiated se determsac.hether appiscaat has compi eJ wah a Boscd B

Partses should preseas ev=Arare is a controlled essaanzed fanhece and she Soard edl not erder af the onstem suhamasses feel to rane may sersons defuencws that the SW magh grant asumpas so suppleascas she secord es pendtes seauas by maksas falames sa enho and dreheL reme4 Commacrmg she cacmans-a= A a hearang as scry unkhelp to he pratmeate aaJ aced nos L3P-41-49 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY. es.L (South Teams Prosect. Um s I be hekt and 2). Docket Non $TN $0-498-OL. STN 50-4994L (ASLSP h 79-421474L). OPERAT.

D The fatacmas acom s neues are dancuned RaJauauswat trasates, Traanpunauen of ING LICENSE; August 36,19g3; MEMORANDUM AND OkDER 3

p**P e *'abeus areem se personal seks len. E*a6mataus for utmeathdJrea Compdanum of a bsa The Laccessag Board d*=a** a mosaan by as sneervenor for reconssderataca of LSP-81-37 A

l eisatahos

' or se recosamend so the C which declined so aded a fineacial ;

(

LBP 81444 CONSUMER $ power COMPANY (323 Rock Poest Plant). Docket No. 50-Q (pursuans so 10 C F R. ( 2.758) thes the rule prohnhauses -t eanon of financial quahfacations 155 l

SPENT IULL ruOE. AMENDMENT. Auguna 15,1933,SIEksoR ANDUns ( A ksen,suas se conicassoas he masveiL picmentan lastand Docussen)

S To make a pnsaa facic showing under 10 Cf R. j 2.758 that a regulatsoa shoulJ he LSP-83 45 bl4G4R 4 Moll 4mE POWER CORPORATION, et al thsee Mde Posas Nacicar waaved, a stronger showing than would be required to hatradace a acw conseassoa must he l

Saw na Uma 23. Docket h 54-4140L ( ASL3P. Ne 83434dl4LD. OPE RATING LICENSE saade. Evidence woulit have so be presesseil demonstrating that the 'acaldy mader review as so i

l PROCLEDt%G. Aa.gma 4,1993, MEMOR ANDlJM AND ORDI R dsNercat from ather prosacts that the rule would not serve the purposes for obsch a was adopsed.

A The Larassag Baerd rules Ebs no heanas as sequered sa thss operahms tweane pacedung 13P-83-50 EUNSUMERS POWER COMPANY (Medined Pinet.Umas I and 2). Doches Nast 50-329 8

The smere fJms t, a srase of a petmaa se perinapase se an ope.asing tweau

-n

(

-OMAOL, 50-330-OMAOL (ASLDP Non. 70 389-03-OL. 80429-02-5P); MODIFICATION l

purwaas so 10 C F R. t 2 fl54d as as seseressed.tase mes cause for orderms a heming The ORDER AND OPERATING LICENSE. August 17.1983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER j

apphea-can recesse a thorough agency reue entwJe d she heanas peacem, abwas h The Lacensang Board denses a seosson by as seservenor to reopen the record, on the A

hens ef ugmfwant cuatrowersed matters er senous safety or cowwommentaa sahues l

grounds that she facts amersed so passary reopeassig do nos faR wathse the scope of as adautsed C

l he heanas a seguared en an operassag lumme apps=== =ahous a sequest fut a beweg conscataan and, an adibania, are act of su&neas safety agasfwance so warrant a reopemag of the i

made se acceedence mah sectaca 1894 d she A=-== < Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and le record.

l C F R t 2 714 Where the cause record of a proceeding is not closed and as santaal dw.=am has nos beca B

LSP-8F46 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMEN ATING COMP ANY, et al. (Perry halen P e,

assued. a party seeksas se reopen the record om assues the adpadecataca af abach have beca Plaan. Umsss I aaJ 23. Dakes hen. 504% S448 0L, oPER ATING LICENSE Augumt 9, comptesed sausa demonstrase that the matter a enshes so have prescased as (1) timely presented.

1933, blEMOR 4NDUM AND ORDER and (2) addressed so a sagasfacama assase. The numehmess ingiary is a Wy so the signafscance of A

The Lacemang Board hakis abs asserveners das aos rane any genusac emme of fut coa.

the seasenal se be coensdered Where an anstaal decessan has beca assued. a party must =th-s-1 j

sermag the =Aracy d the sesene pugram, aanpsed by the applecans and reguared by the saa.T.

ly demoestrase the the metaer as susceptable of afsenng the result previously reached.

for===f=~tms and masaamasas turbines se prevens she scaerassen of sesmart Commequeatty, sues.

A party moving to reopen a record must oNet aga.facans new evodence and ces emerely C

man dewasuon of the twbone sasa ae neue as gransed The fa6 shat Gescral tiectric Cesapmay

" bare allegatsoas" or new consentsoas. Pacarac Gas and Electnc Co. (Diable Canyon Nuclear a CenJahang a susJy thas coukt aber thes coach-a a sme gruunds Iur grannes a caaha==are F**er Pines. Uans I and 29.CLF81-5, IJ NRC Mt. M24) (1988).

B 5.o;aary devassa.on must be grassed anJess a party dersonstraaes the eanseme of a scanume esme of fut by wtnas fank specars tacts nah as mee kl be aJas subec se evalence -

LSP-8b51 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY (Byron Nuclear Power $tataca. Unets I and 2). Doches Nos. STN 54454-OL STN 544550L (ASLSP h 79-4Il44-PE). OPERATING

5. ace an anscle, acs -

- + by a suppermag aditasas..ouaJ aos be -*== -hs se essJence.

LICENSE; August 17,198J. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER j

l she arkle raa= 4 he she ground for estabkabsag the esasacace of a geaume annae of fus_

The Laceassag Board reports on ses se camera receips of safarniataca concesanas pendaag A

C Susemary devaassma may not be densed en spesulauess the an ongosas study aughs pro.

anvenhgw - and eassuttaont i

duke semks helpful so the party opgmung numunary dnpuunca. Nor can a e==a au a<e be graased B

Pursuaas so 10 C.F R. l 2.744(c) and the Comsmassaoe Augus 5,1983 5 stemens of ahea, after a seTecaena permed of descovery. e party seeks aMsaapaal time so etmaan an espert pology. la,e.gw.ama and 44sadscasory Proceedsass. 48 Fed. Res M.358, the Lacenang Board estmem saay receswa esclassvely se camera inforesanon frase the Offse of I= p-tson and Enforcessent D

The fotiones scohnscal assues are ducasaned Turbene musules esempecteen ang aaJ the Offue oflavestasaisons conceranas pendmg naspectaans and savesugations.

maassaceance). Ustrawasc nests, surbsnes. Turtmae muusses. n3hs, meripee.I pruseciana syvem, turtmars, Generas Ese6 re: assotear surmanes C

Aishough to C F R. 5 2.744(c) refers only no NRC docuraents whKh saay be presented for the preasJams officer's esclasse as camera sospection for relevancy and esempoon sonder 10 LDP-8347 50UTIlERN CALDORNI4 EDESON Q)MPANY, et al. 45am Onuire Natear Generas_

ang 58ataus. Units 2 and 36 Dutkes Not S3el4M 4362OL 4 4518P Ne 78-3654IOL).

C F R. l 2 790, the C "s Auguss 5,1983 Ssatenecas of Polacy. Invesugassans and A4u-dscatory Proceedmss,4e Fest Reg. M.338, authonzes the pressding officer also no saspect aca-OPERATING LICEN5E. August 12. 3983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDt R doc-easasy salonnataos sa Camera and esclasswa of other pernet A

The Laccewas Board grants the Applacants* saosa a so suppismscas the retard, huidung l

thes they had etes thew burden of densectsaracas a s*==a*hs* asustance the aseJakaa nersEcs ar-LAP-83-52 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMENATING COMPANY. es at (Perry Nuclear Poect Flaas. Umts I and 2), Docket Nos. 50440-OL,5044toL; OPERATING LICENSE; August f

rangesacass had been maJe be the offwse pubhc sa the etens of a wnous mocmsent 18,1983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER D

T he C -

hs seserpresed to C F R y 50 4Nbti12) en a semenc b m so seguire The Lacemang Board reopens as record on quakey assurance on as own mossoa. sa ordet l

A only that esassang meibcal facihtaes be sdeansfaed wah reapcts so snks of s t-a-== empart to the to recease wratea falangs concerams a docuencat thes was (ded by an anservemor and that apper-eduse pubhs. bards are aos so go beyesml huts of ennung fuahues se desersasac shether thee cally asulacanes senous problems aos covered se pnet testunemy. latervenor's motaos to reopea facabases are %..s, so cope.4h.anouse accalents se the use-spec fm wtsang the record a dcased her=aa* the fanlure so eneroduce this evidence sano the record as an earlser LW 434s TEXA5 UTILTTIES GEM RATI'sG n>MPANY et at (Coman6he Peah Sacasa Elecirs tasme was due to anservesar's fashare no permac ses descovery rehts un a tamefy fashsoa.

Staason, Unses I and 28. Decket N.E 50445.50444 Ort R ATING LICt NSE, August 15, 1983. MEMORAND4N AND ORDE R A

The Lacan,g BoarJ lhAJn that a es aus apgwopnase es surpicarat the seserJ eias engs-ans pro 6eeJang math usanulacard fahngs Partses have an ubt.gance so amas the Board by preiens-29 2s I

I

DIGESTS o

I=etDCh OF THE t.TO488C SAFETY IED L4CE3 54MG BO4taes 1%ULNCES OF TB8E LTO800C 54FETY LMD LICEM6eNG BO4tDE i

S

% hem the catare record has not been closed, the record an a sangle snanse stay be ree-as esB mot reopen the record.tself. as the saserest of compdaag a compeces record, becaine enter-peacd on a sharosas skar the saataan so reopes as t.mely and rasses as esame of substance.

venor had not persuaded at th.t the eastenal rancs a senous adety matact thas woubt not other-IE=Poever a moesua es aos amely d at as bened am safermanea shas shoukt have been descovered wase bc ena aseerest paar as na evidensaary heanns B

la a separate mn** a snehom to strae aca-record ma4crut as dessed because the Suard C

% hem an inacrvense knags emperiaan aformentaus sa baht, the Board must anqmare further may agnore saaecruis that are act as the record and motheng as gesaed by straans those masenais.

se order se have a compecar secord evra af the saformatene should have toca filed at an earher C

When feedsags have beca requwed concerasag an aspect of as adsutsed

_a name This accost a partacularly appropraste when the are informasaca casts acw hght es carber mosana to reopen muy be gransed caly of et as namely and rasses an assue of substance. The Board ac=====ay may take op late matters seself, base at snust Grst be persuaded that they are essential so the ESP SI-52A GULF STATES IJTILITIES COMPANY, et al IEaver SeeJ Statson, Umsts I and 2),

dei, of an asaporiant safety assue.

Dxtes Non. So-4584)L, So-459-OL 4 ASLSP No. 82-464414)L); OPER ATING LICENSE; D

Unespected events in the course of a hearing do aos provide grounds for lase-fding docu-Aegsnt 26.1983, MU40R ANI,UM ascats two menshs after the close of the hearms.

A la thes seemcrandum the Lacenseng Board rules se the -~

, of consess=a== se E

Estra-record anaserials acco not be struck from the Board's (des, as the Board may this operaems hccaer pesweedaag and estabenhes proccdures for further proceedings.

smerely ignore those anaecrials as reachsag ats decesua D

The C-- ehmsmased the revsew of fanancul ;-

frean powet plaat hcean.

LBP-83-56 DUKE POWER COMPANY, et at (Catamba Nuclear Statson, Umets I and 2), Docket seg branags se part besaane at coulJ aus fami any reason so -ter, in a vecessa, the general Nos. 50-4134)L, 50 414cL (A51 BP No. SI-461484)L), OPER ATING LKEN*E, Scytember aanbes of =Lan no.a==c the construason of new generataca nzame= Only when pseed wish 6,1983 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER r

s the unas et adequase preseason of the puths heat:h and safety does thes assue hecam pertament A

The Laccamang BoarJ dcases neossoas for su==ry de=pa=naa of a c.w.a relauas so C

Centestanas atsatang the Ca=aumaa=*s res 'a=== are prowan,.e unless one pens==

s4e operataos of the spent fuel puoi at the Catawba facalaty. The Board grants a relased motion can snake a pnma facie showing es special cacw=n-ares" such that applynag the regulaeacan as conceranas the cavercamcatal eflects of the spean fuel poet The Board desmes a motaan for snac-the specafac case would out serve the perpenes for whech as war adopted 10 C F.R. l 2.75g noas based merely upon one party's asapermesseMy marrow reading of a conecatma.

41983).

LSP-33-57 LONG ISLAND LIGitTING COMPANY (Shorehamn Nuclear Power Stauun, Umst I),

D The mere alicaation of fasaasul proNems, three unrelased easpectaan reports, and as Docket No. 50-322-OL; OPERATING LICENSE; Sepeceber 21, 1983, PARTIAL INITIAL.

occaly sequessed dev=== trean standards de aos <===*-a-a safety proMesa na as as persnet a DECISION fehas of specut cuc===a-s* as requered by le C F R. t 2.758 for the weaver af the prohnbe-A The Laccaseng Board emues a Partial lantaal Decanon decubag all assues before it, escept hun es 10 C F R. 6 50 404M hamas the review of finnacial <pa**=== m hceaang heanags the emergeng diesel gracrasar c en whach hhgasaun was deferred at the request of all L

Where asservenors have not edenstaed a ssagte chemacal er efflucas of any kaad that parties IOffese emergency plasmas usues are pemleas tw hhgasma before a separase incemens mughs ansesacs wah semic ampectaed level or quantity e( sonarang rmbriam, ceasennons allegang board) The Board decades aR assues an Appiscant's favor, wath the enceptma of pornons of two that emanames mia, came health hazards esther alone er sa - ^

wah andusanal ciffutats aerues savaivag Mark 11 camsmaament loads due to RHR descharge made operateos and the test-aaremly presena en the area's aar and water are too vague and lack.ag in specificaty se permat seg and enspection program for esadeseceed check valve fa hare. However, the Board finds that smeammgful hngasaan the pendency of those two assues, over whach parisJactaos has beca retained, would not prevens F

The flesabihty as the 10' esse EPZ regidatory sequeremens does nos c.c.; -

.= %.s.,

-- of a low-power (up so 5%) operanas hecase, af and when the penJms diesel essues are so remose a chaam of speculative cucumstances as thas en=*e* by asservenors as a -

resolved en til CtYs favor.

aneging that ammates of a prison locased 18 aseles freas the pleas macht eflect a mass, armed S

The decessoa dem Seciaan Vi secludes several condetsons savolving the aanplementauon of emape aml Jisrups the erderly maplementatena of the emergency plasL the recent ride goverasag envuoamental qualsfication of electrecal equepenent i10 C.F R.

LEP Ski) (ONSUMERs POWER ContPANY (Madlama Plaas, Umsts I and 28 Doches Nea 50-i 50 44, and the agreeniene by LILCO to the NRC Staff's defineteen and applecasaca of the 3294*IAOL, 50-3h0MAOL i ASLBP Nos. 78-38943% 30-42942 SP); MODIFICATION seems "amportans so safety" and " safety-related" innofar as safety et

'W and quahfacanoa ORDER AND Ort RATING LICENSE; Augusa ll,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER of plant structures, systems and componcess are concerned The Isoard also recommends that

'L The Esceaumg Board grants mac mar== to speash : "

A desses another anossoa en the Commmasseos comuder-whether the LCCS Appendas K factors should be updased for the quash =hewa-* ami esters a prosectsve order so govers the enforcemens of the abroemas.

current SWR S a 8 fuel array, and whether the Staff shoeld provide detaded guidance for the B

An atteracy's represe=m a=

that all cosamanacataoss between the attorney and the eJcataficanaus of "unpunama ao safety" equipmcat requwed for enveroasnental quahrication by 10 party were for the purpose as receiving legal advice, es sufficient for an ameriana af assaracy-CJ R t 50 4WkH2L The Chawman of the Board also recomimcads that the Comaussion conuJ-chens pnvdese es whether present and protected progress and ananagemens by the Staaf of Unresolved Safety C

A party's aced for encovery easweighs any rak of harm fraas the posential selease of an.

Ismaec A-37 (Systems laserarsson) es proper.

I farasataca when the NRC Staff has =a rana.t that me ongosas anwessagesson wiu be popardized, C

The Board also demes, en the baus of the Cora==aa='s prevous ruhag sa alus case, Suf-

• bee all ascatwees ami alcassfrang enfursian== are escluded from draw, and when a8 ether folk Caussy's motaos that a low-power hcense condo not be assued unless a revased NLPA cost-niformh* as d*scussed amter the aegas of a protectsve order benefas analyses was performed se consaJer the circurastance of denial of a fullfomer hccase due D

Eves where a Fna Amendment er <-law pnvdege es fauml==ps..ha* Se a party can enadequase effuse emergency preparedneses(See Section IV.)

l for manpurup remsang drscovery, thaa pnvalege as aos absoluse. A bceaung board must balance D

The fonowns sed-mi usues are descumed: Water Hammer, ECCS Core Spray, Pasuve i

the sahoe of the enferatatana soughs to be olaassed math the harm caused by reveakag the Mechangal Valve Fadure. Aatacapated Transecats Witho.as Scram, Sessnaec Desage, Mark II enfonemum Comaasamicat, Safety Rehef Valve Tests and ChaHenges Poss-Accideas Memnonas Eawwommen-L8P 23-55 TEXAS ITTILITIES GENER ATING COMPANY, et at (Comanche Peak Sicans Electric 881 Qualafwassen 5, stems Interacnom and Safety Clasuracataan, Quai 6ty Assurance and Quahty C88"8-Saarion, Unsas I and 23. Duket Nos. 50-445, 50-446 OPER ATDeG EICENSF, September I, 1983. htEMORANDUM AND ORDER A

Imeervenor's==a-=

es scopen the record as a porteos of a consema=a after famhags had beca reguarcJ so be fJed en thas portana, as densed as esaumely. The Board further deceles thas 33 38 4

• N DIGESTS

.IS51TNCES OF Tilt CTO%8tC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS u

ISSUANCES OF Tile f,TOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS LBP 83-58 (INCINN 4TI GA5 & ELLCTRIC COMPANY, et al (Wdhara 11 lammer Nuclear Wesunghouse equipment M) appis6 ant apparently had snadequase knowledge of code authorua-Poect Star.on, Unst II, Datet No 50-358-OL ( ASLSP No 76-387414)L), OPER ATING LICE NSE,5cptember 15,1983 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER taos for the use of plug =cids and consequently dad not anstaute a hou pomt that wouu have beca requared for adequate anspect on of such welds, (7) appheant has not adequately A

latervenor set:uoned for reconsiderassor of the Luenung Board's ruhng sa LBP 33-54, d*"***"ated that unproper doenhdi welds are not a problem at Comamhe Peak; (8) apphcaat 16 NRC 210 (1992) %g at had fmacJ to seusly the requ rements of to C F R. 6 2 714(a) to have has not adequately demonstrated the at has kept inciJents of uncontrolled melJ rods to an accept-caght late-fJed contentoons aJmsned a thss prosceding Alacroauvety, latestenor pet Laoned to able number; 49) the:e was an encadent an uhach a gunhty assurance Inspector. Mr. Aulusos, have thee comaeassons aJmetted on the bass of new mformataos wha 6h furmshed " good cause.

• as pressured snto approvsag a report agmast has own best judgment, and (801 the apphcads for thcar late (Jag After laserveaur abmadoned the pentaos for reconsederatma, the Larensmg Ianal Safety Analysis Report should have beca amended to redest accurately the rock overbreak Board agara densed the ahw of the eight cantent.ons, holdmg that acw enformance ebach problem that occurred and Imlare to correct the report constuutes a material false statement.

was cadmJe the 16 ope of the contenuoas ruled ce na 1BP 82-54 had not beca presented and that C

A Buard may declare a default for future to file required findmgs This default &>cs not.

the Gwe crueria d 10 C F R 6 2 73444) halanced agenst aJmasson of the cententaons however, prolutus the Board from mquaring smo the defaulted matters af necessary to compile a B

Intervenors must dagently uncover and apply all avadable aformatica to the prompt complete record on a contenue that as stdl part of the case. Nor dres the default proluhit the formulauun of contentions Duke Power Ce (Catsuba Nuclear Station Units I and 21, CLI-83-19,17 NRC 1043 (1933)

Board from clocnsng help from the defaulting setervenor sa pursums the Board's continuang emerns C

Where entervenor does aos show good cause fut the montamely submstsaos of D

% hen the Board finds review of the emergency plan by the Federal Lmergency Manage-contentauss, et misst nuke a compelhng shoo.ng on the other lour crueraa of 10 C F R.

t 2 Il4tal Mmanspre Poect & Laght Co (Grand Guti Natear Stanon, Unas I and 2),

meat Agency to be cursory, n may estabhsh a procedure by wheth n may determine whether or not to saase thes matter sua sponte AL ABJO4, la NRC 1725 (1932)

E Applicant must provute a reasoned response to allegatens of as inavulual who had an D

Despete the fa6t that nonusnefy contentaons smse mutters whs636 have not previously been langased, the requirements for reopeams recorJs must be sausf.ed na aJJetapa to the requerements cPpurtunsty to observe con &tauns to ehnh he objects, esca af the witness hs had previous con-

ctens for violent crimes.

of 10 C F R-6 2 714tal Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nalcar Power Plant, F

% hen a Board has saveled objectsons to a proposed decesson, parues must make speciGc Unds I and 2L (15 42-39,16 NRC 1712,1714-15 (1982r L EP-33-59 % AsillNGTON PUBlIC power SUPPLY SYSTEM, et at t%PP55 Nuclear Prorct objecteuns or emne their rights to contsnue to pursue the issues involved The Io830*

Quahey assurance, Emergenc) planmng; Prosecuve comungs,'as techrucal swues are discussed.

G No 18 Du6ket No. 50-440-CP A ( ASLBP No. 33-48142 CP A); CONSTRUCTh>N PERMIT, latamulanon of quahay anuran6e inspectors, liarassment of quahey assurance September 21, 1981,MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDE R A

Upna un6palested anotwo of estervenor orgarazatava and without balan6:ng the Gvc fac, anspectors, Protetted actmty - dmbrge on a present; Faring quahty assurance inspector on a nurs of 10 C F R. 4 2 714(aHID, the La6enwns Board accepts the wuhdrawal of afrJavit of the Pretent Manamum roughness of protective coatmgs; Adhesion testmg of protectise comungs; Smoke on protectsve comungs, % eave weldsng; Itus eclJs; Plug welds (inspectma of); Downhill omi, authorums menaber wah stan&ng, accepts the authorusna affidava of a new member with welang; Weld rod contrut, lidu bolt inspechon, Fdies welJ. gap, %ater quen6heng of melda, aus.

stamans, and atrarms the conunuataus of the procecang O

The represcara=e sa the peuuos the the enterests of the organuataoa are predicated ca seastsc samsJess steel, Rock overbreak; Blast damage to foundauon rock, Rotk daman in the saterests of awmbers with stavkbrg, best act the edentdaes of those members, as a masering foundanoa, Dental concrete, Concrete as part of a foundauen; Ra&atoon, cracks in re:ctor shaeld wall.

part of the gentaost C

A chnge sa the eJentmes of the authorums members of an organizataca es not a materus LBP-3341 LONG ISLAND LIGilTING COMPANY (shorchm Nuclear Power Station, Uma I),

change that requises an amendment of the peusma to whsch the Eve-fa6aor ness of 10 C.F R Docket No 50-322OL-3, EMLRGENCY PLANNING; September 27, 1983, MEMOR ANDU M AND ORDER DENYING SUFFOLK COUNTY MOTION TO COMPFL DISCOVERY IROM i 2.714taHI) woulJ be apph6abne D

Once an orgamamuonal petdaos so entervene es granted, at is presumed the the class of IE M A A

The Lacenwns Board denacs a moten 10 compel producten of a certain FEM A empknee austerians members sah starklms continues to enest L BP $3 60 TEX A5 UTILITILS GENER ATING COMPANY, et at (Conunche Peak Stearn Electric for depouuon regardmg the FEM A review of an emergency plan Stauon, Umats I anJ 29 Dothet Not W445, W446 OPE R ATING LICENSE, September 23 B

Pursuant to sateragency Memorandum of Understanding, the Federal Emergency 1983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Management Agency IFEM A) is acung as consuhat to NRC in emergency plaamns matters, 4

la this Jetissue the Lscenwns Board resuives obsectaons tht the Board bJ sovsted from als employees are thus entatted so limitations on discovery alforded NRC consultants by 10 the parues to help at to resuive currect:y the assues covered sa ets Proposed Imtaal Decessue of C F R. 46 2.720(hj(2)(a) and 2 4f pt Where party requestmg productiost for deposition of a cer-hly 29,1953 tLBP43-43, is NRC 122) The BuarJ desnumes the emergency plannang cenica.

tma IEM A empknee fmis to show " exceptional circumstances," request as demed taoa but estabhshes a pro 6edure the edi pernut it so Jecade ehether the emergency plans are so C

The role of 'he Federal Emergency Management Agency (f1M A) sa emergen6y plan review as the of " consultant" so NRC: FEM A submats as capers aJvne concertung emergency an60suptete tha the Board edi declare their adequaty so be a sina sponte assue.

B Although several of appheant's objectauns are sustaned, cauung fewer aJverse Enangs plans to NRC, ohnh evaluates that advice ;n conjunrtson with all other evidence of record.

so remma, the Board makes the follooms 6adings adverse so the apphcaat (D a supervisor, (Interagency Memorandum of UnderstanJms,45 Fed Reg at 82,734 (1980W LBP-8342 CONSUMERS PO'AER EOMPANY (Big Roth Poent Plano, Do6ket No 50-155, mho called a r%ect ng about " ant-puking" by quahry amusance snspecters, was wi. tang so have SPENT FUEL POOL AMENDMLNT; September 30,1983, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER quahty amuran6e emoc6 sors do a less thorough job of reporung dc6cicacies, (2) quahty assurance A

The Board demes meervenor's monon to reopen the record based on new mformanon a erape. tors =cre brawed by the pa.nt craft, (38 a quahty assurance inspector, mho apparently mas had obemned about the approprute standards to be apphed em determanmg whether apphtant has sou carefid fur aunagement's lekmg, mas &smaned front has M on a prescat; (4) the avadabahty of a recent proceJural change does not rebut testimony the apphcant's quahty amurance proce, comphed muh the NRC Sta!!'s cruscality requirements (aeutron muluphcahon factor requarements) for a spent fuel pool. The Board holds that tfu al'cged dJferente in staaJards as daares for verifyirig "near whae beast" were mmJequate durms an entended permd of tune; ($)

snoot. Smcc apphcant as now required so show the the water an sts spent fuci pool wd4 not rass sufficient reasons hve aus beca prevmled to demonstrate the adequacy of protecute coatsngs os above R$0*F, the masamum temperature at wh4ch the entegrity of the concrete poof can be 33

DIGESTS DIGESTS

'IsSOfMES OF TIIE LTOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOAR D$

MUANCES OF lilE ATOMIC SAFETY f ND LICENSING BOCDS anureJ. se es no longer necessary for apphcant so show that the neutros munsphcataos faciar LBP-8346 % A5il!NGTON PUBLIC POW ER SI!PPLY 5)STFM, et at (% PPss Nuacar Project ik g4 weds not en eed 0 95 at semperatures higher than the 150"F.

No 18, podet No 50-460-OL ( ASL BP No. 824794e-OL), OPERATING LICENSE;(Asober B

The Latenwns Board has jures&6uos eser tunes remanded to at by abe Appeal Board I4,1983 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER esca af the Jeassua ordenng the remand has beca appealed to the Commisuon A

l ae L atenung Board issues a memoranduns and order admattmg a number of contenteons C

% hem app 4Aant must show that the mater se ats fuel puoi edl not rise above 150*F sa and an orgamzational petsuoner shach had been held so have standmg en a pnor order Because order so resana the ansegnty of the pool concrete, that er,aumurn semperature value estabhshes of a haetus sa constructeun, anucipated so last Lar up so Gvc years, and the NRC StafTs alksataca the maanmura semperature at shach appa mas muss show that the neutros midtspiacanon factor of resources to the hcense apphcanon only on a "manpuwer avadable" baws, the wocee&ng es a

f hat an its fuel puut must not rue above 0 95.

heu en abeyance.

D The fonowmg se6hnscal assue is daicussed. Neutros medtap4xataua facsor ik,at L BP-8347 Tile REGENTS OF Tile UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (UCLA Research Reactor),

Lisp-8343 TLX AS IITILITIES GEMR 411NG COMPANY, et al. (Comanche Peak Sacam Electrac Docket No. 50-142-OL ( ASLBP h so-44445-OL), OPERATING LICE NSE RENEW AL;(Ato-Stataon, Usuas I arad 2), Do ket Nos 50-445,50-44a, OPERATING LICENSE, October 6,1983, her 24,1983 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAR TI AL INITIAL DEC1510N A

The Licensang Board rules on Staff's Motson for Reconsderaisun of LBP-33-25 A The A

The La enung Board deoJes that appiacart as committed to the 1974 versaca of the Board reverses that poruon of its ruhng which held that seated plutoneuan-berythism neutron A5ME Basler and Pressure Vesel Code and is not commutted no subsequent verwoes that mode-sources are so be conudered for purposes of deternunang whether a formula quantasy of strategic Ged the dewan allowable for A500 $ sect. Ilowever, the Code anu=able was maneruny reduced special nuclear materul cants fut purposes of 10 C F R t 73 60 Staffs Motaos is denied m an beume et was dasovered tha weldes stageratures cause stus cou-rolled steel so lose 57% of other respects.

the strength prevauusly aHoved by the Code. Consequendy, apphcant shouM complete an analyns B

The repubhshed versson of a proposed amendment to Part 73 (48 Fed. Reg 34,056 of whether Code safety marpas have been innduly eroded because of the 57% reductaon en mate.

(19831) andacates that the Commeswon sasends that the { 73 67(b)(1)(u) enempuon for rui strength for A500 Secciined sa melJed pipe supports.

plutonsum-beryllaum neutron source be enLiuued sa 6 73 tio.

B Although apphcant's only comnutment was so the 1974 verwon of the ASME Code, ap-LBP$348 CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK (inaan roma, Una 2) and placant must show f pursuant to General Dewsn Cnteru I and 4) why at consaders ats pope sup.

PO% ER AUTilORfiY OF Tile STATE OF NEW YORK (inaan Point Unp 3), Docket Nos ports to be safe an hght of a shinequent dncovery the one of the 1974 Code aDowables was en 50-247-5P, 50-286-SP ( ASLBP No. SI-466-03-$P); SPECIAL PR )CEEDING. October 24, error 1983, RECOMMENDATIONS TO TIIE COMMIS$10N C

Apphcant's complaan& with apphcabic Code prownsons es not a compleie defense 50 an A

la thss assuance the Lxenwng Board reports als findmss and recommendations mairess.ng anegatson the marsms of saf, hve beca unduly eroded because of an error that has been es.

sevea questaons enganally presented by the Commassion and related contenuons protTered by covered as a Code aDowabic.

Intervenors The Board concludes that eith the unplementauon of certain safety emprovements D

The fonoems technscal assues are dncussed-CoM-roned steet A500 Stect; A5ME Code recommended by et, in&an Pomt Unats 2 and 3 may operate with reasonable assurance thee the Case N-71-10. Marsms of safety; Ratchetang, regulatory pubhc health and safety edt be protected LBP8344 CONSUMER $ PO%1R COMP 4NY (Mediand Plant, Umsts I and 2), Docket Nost 50-329 B

Rd essmates based on the Masamum L.skehhood Prmcaple are more reahsaac and less m-

-OMAOL, 50-330-OMAOL ( ASLBP Nos. 78-38943-OL,30-429 02-SP); MODIFICATION susuve than those obtamed uans Bayes' Theorem.

ORDE R AND Ort R ATING LICENSE, October 6,1981, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER C

Rask essunates for an esistmg mutuple-plant sue are appruenately empressed as the com-4 The Lxensang Board denses a anotion for recer mderstaan of that porteos of LBP-83 53 bened risk iroen all unais, a c., a per-site-year rather Lt.an a ger-reactor-year risk.

• hath densed a snouon by deponents so quash depoutaos subpoenas D

la amesung societal rnk, the Board recoarmends that the Commasson conwder not only B

% here an apphcaat's attorneys recesse enformataos subsect to a protestave order, both capected res, defined as the arithmetacal product of probabehty consequences, but aho the abso-the apphcans and the attorneys couM be subsect to "sersous sanction" if any of the anformataca lute value of the comequences It may be desarable to regmre the espected rnk salue to decrease were revealed by those attorneys (abscat further ordes by the Board).

lur lo*-pre,babekly,lugh-consequence accidents C

Quesasons asked om depomuon must be relevant so matters at assue se a procecens 10 E

In asacasang overan societal rnk from the operahon of the in&an Pusnt plants, the Com-C F R 6 2 74)abatt) aussaoa should conader not only the espected annual rak obtained by multiplying prol,4behty D

lac La6can.ng BoarJ's authority so "comanon densat of la snotion to quasan a subpoena]

per year tames 6onsequences but aho the cumulauwe risk to the population of consmued plant on pst and reasonable serms" 00 C F R l 2 720ti)(213 pernuts a to aHow a deponent to dechne operataost sa good faut to answer questaons on grounds e4 lack of relevance, wah dnagreenients settled F

la appears than fdiered, vented contarunent systems and separate containment spacms through the fahng of a ne so compel further responset are costly and meffettave safety measures as present.

LBP-8145 ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (Emergy Systems Group special G

The fears that emergency workers edi not respond Io a raJeologsal emergency and that Nuclear Malenals Lacense h SNM-21), Docket h 70 25 ( ASLBP No. SI-48848-ML); $PE-8h* general pubhc mH not cornply with anstsuctsons are unwarranted provided proper tra.nmg Cl4L NUCLEAR M ATERIALS LICENSE RENEWAL, October 7,1983. MLMORANDUM and t.nproved planning can be amplemented AND ORDER ll The esidence as support of the predatnbuuon of potasuum no&Je to the pubhc &cs not A

la this MemoranJum and Order the Laceaung Scard serminates the proceedsag on the outocash the mc&6al rnk of us pumubic ausane. Potassaum wi te shoulJ be skakpded for use g ound that none of the submesmons received frwa prospective antervenors fulfdled the requere-by emergency workers and persons who cannot be esacuated ments fut unersentam by an "macre-med perios" no as no mandene that a hearms be convened I

Because so few comprehenwve probabahstac rak assessments have been maJe to date, B

la the absence of at least one subnu-a fadiums the requerements for entervenhos by and because those probstmhstac rnk assesaments that have been nude la6h comparabihty, there macrested persons 30 as to mashlate that a hearms be convened, there as no authorny to hold a does not cant a body 84 statutscs upon wha 6h dependebte rnk comparatons of afferent plants hearms can be based l

l 35 l

l 34 l

l

l DIGHTS DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TI8E L70A80C SAFETY AND LICENSING 904RDS thSU ANCES OF THE ATohtIC SAFETY AND Ll 'ENSING SOASDes LEri M TEXAS UTILITIES GENER 4 TING COMF ANY, es at IC-=<he Peak Sacam Electric canon af Decesaber13,1982 (LDP.82-109.16 NRC 1826) er thss lasual Dec==am as assue so Ap-Stas *a. Umts I and 2) Dociet Nos. 50-445, 50-446 OPER ATING LICENSE; October 25*

1963 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER phcans a hcrase en operase CaNeway Finnt, Ums: I.

S No specaGc federal regulosory requerescas enants for the distr 4unos of KI to any parece-A la thes Memorandum and Order, the Laceassag Soard receamders ats decasma (LSP-8340, IS NRC 672 (1983)) es regare fdsags en Emmergency Flammens aaJ decales that a lar group of sadsviduals the seatter es left to state and local ofGcials to determane. Federal should ma===Am as assesess because the manner was aos es sufracmas safety amporuace ao W Esmeracacy Managemens Ascacy guidehnes provide that each stase has a respoessbehty far far-madahms gudence to deGac siand when posassauan sodule a to be dessrsused for use as a 5 yreed a sua sponse emue.

D A%h a Board may make prelamunary saquenes SS desermuae shelher er aos Ben pursue blockang agtet for esmergeScy workers, eaststuhoaah2ed persons, and the general pubhC.

C la as aos a governmental requirement that emergency response plans formulate proseceve an assue sua s mase, prehmunary sagiones should nos

- % burJee the parues la order ao e

impose v=ame.=nus burdens, a Board sness Gris declare a sua spones assese.

actacas for every cosiccavabic development dianas a redsologicail release. Where she saaer has en-C Even shough the Board has declared that a party has defaaaw by nos GIsag Gadamp m crcised as.%

' lety.-

" decating agaamat the distr 4uhem of KB for use by messers of penaeau of an adested snaus, the BoarJ may consaase se pursue those portanas of assues as the pubisc, that actaan smeets current federal sedehmes LBP-83-72 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (shoreham Natear Power Stavaan Uses 1),

order se a=f* a reasonaNy compeete record if the Board ha ao peersue those portscas of DuketNo. 50-3220L-3; EMERGENCY PLANNING, Nevesaber I,1983, MEMORANDUM "Wes. 8e may perous the defautted party le ashsts as by partacapattag as quesanoes the Board AND OltDER pursues A

Laceassag Board sustaans FEM A's cimse of "emecuuve pnvilege" prosection from coas-D The follooms sechmecal assues are descussed Qual.ty amurance (antamadatsom of pelled poduction of certasa documents creased by that agency, whsic grantsag anotaca 10 compel ampectorsh Quaisty amurance (pranks played om isnpectors); Plug ockis; DownheB =cMing as se cenam factual portons of the documcast LDP 33-70 CONSUMERS power CUMPANY (Madiard Plant. Unas I and 2) Docket Nos 50 329 8

ClaMa IM prmectaca of "enscutwe prudege" for cenana Federal Esmergency Managessent

-OMAOR 4330CMAOL (ASLSP Nos. 78-38943ct,84-429 02.SP); MODIFICATRON ORDER AND OPERATING LICENSE;Ocaober 28,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Agency (FEMA) docunies s was not properly saveted where k (1) was not amened by she head of the agency; (2) did nos spe incally descr4e the documents soughs to be wahheW; (3)

A The Laceasses Board receanaders and afGras a paar beach sideas se eh.ch a found sha dat aos asase pectae reasons Iur peservtag confalessaahty as to the specaGs docuencass; and (4) t'ie maorney< hens pensiege as avastalde se prosect the substance of a sneetang mhscle was atacaded oss act accompmased by the docuaments attemmelves, under seal, for poonsbis is cassera sospectaon by one assuracy ashi otracers of too corporatanas with certase shared anserens se acq.=..a= ef an by the Board Umsed Stases v. Capaal Service, Inc.,89 F R D. 575 (E D. Wes 1981). However, NRC operatsas Imense for the Madland plans.

FT.M A was gsven a GAece day enicassoa of tessie to properly assert the gravdege.

B To et=== the assoracy<licas pnvdese, se must be shown tha (1) the wned homer of C

Regardless of whether certana docuencass creased by FEMA for anseraal use can be cf ar.

the prndese as or sought se become a ciment, (2) the pensa se whoan a n

- was actenzed as "pohcy forsr=I=saaa

• where the documents cosass of advasory opsances, recosamen-made (a) e a enember of the bar of a cenart, or has subordnasse and (b) as comacceaua enh the dahoms er debberatsons as the agency's decasson-makeng process shey are catdled Io "caccuuve e acting as a lawyer, (3) the +

resaaes se a fact es whsh the maar-acy was anformed (al by has chens, (M enthout the presea6e of strangers, (c) fur the purpose of Fw*ge" posectaos from compelled produtson pursuant so discovery request.

D Where Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) cleams protection of secunas pranardy enher (d an opsaeon of law er (m) legal services er (ms 6egd

-swe se "eneCutsve pnvdege" for certaan of sts documents because their disclosure would have a some legal proteeding, and see (J) for the purpose of ra==are=ig a crume er nors, and (4) the "chsthag effect" co she Agency's decasson-maktag process, the avestable pnvilcge us a spanhGed prov*ge has beca ta) st===d and (M mes sawect by the chen Umsed $4mes t Unded Shoe one subgest to balancans of FEMA's need for the prwalese agassist the requesung party's need for Maclumery Cerm.89 F. Supp 357,358-59 (D. Mass 1950).

the documenet Leah Islead Lightang Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Saatunt, Uma D, C

The staoracy< heat ynwalese was aos wasved by prewa6e of shard persons as a meetang be, LBP-82-82,16 NRC 1844 (1982).

sween chens and maorney, where the atuauna savolved reprencatauves of two peas cheats sech-LSP-83-73 ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION (R E. Osman Nuclear Pleas, Unos ans advue frans the asacracy 4,f one such thcas abous comumen legal poliacmt I). Deckes Net 50-244-OLA (ASLSP No. 79-427474LA); OPER ATING LICENSE D

Proeecten of the anurney< hens pnedese was nos sawed a no the sue a= e(a cena m AMENDMENT; November 7,1983; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER mecuas by revetassoa of the dase of the meetang, ses atacah as purpose and us broad general A

The Lacenssag Board descraunts that a further notace of opportuasty for esserventaos sueyect =raer shouhl be assued so supersede one assued over ten years before en alus proceedans obsch had E

The attermey-cl.cas pnvdese as avadanac se prsnect - --

made at a sacetuig beca hebt se abeyance pendams a lengthy NRC Staff reveem mostly conducied under she Sys-the pnmary purpose of shuh was the receipt of legal advice, even of sosse -

,kaome esmatac Evalu=sma= Program. The Board further denses laservenor's reqasests for sanctaons agasass factual maners were ancheded se the descuseson, er inAme. anon-legd ansva e mis eschanged Appiscans and NRC Staff, and a reimbursemens of latervenor's future captases, whach he bened F

The Lweaums Board edi nos safer that advme previJed by an anotacy at a certaae ances.

upon act besas slotaGed en advance of certasa Appiscans Staff sechascal meetangs.

ang with ha chess was of a non legal thcare, umpnvaleged) nature where- (ll an afGJaves by S

Uader the author.sy of Hausson Laghung and Poect Co. (Auens Creek Nuclear Generas-l tile chens stases that she purpose of the mectang was the reccaps oflegal advme, eaJ (2) ne shoe.

sag Stahon, Umst 1) ALAB-535. 9 NRC 377, 386-87 (l979) acd ALAB-539,9 NBC 422 ans as made ohnt moukt provide a bans no safer that the anoracy would have beca er was con-(1979), a proceeding behl an abeyance pendme a lengthy Staff review sause be remoticed where sulsed se any role other than that of legal advasor the ongmal snotac: of an opponumsy for beanas had beca assued over ten years before.

G w here legal ad*Ke as sougat froan am staarney en goud imah by one who es er as neckang C

la the abacace of any ediful veolahoms ef Apphcant's er Staffs oblagahoes so ste Liccas-se becosac a chema, the fact that the atteracy a aos subicepsently retamed am nu may afIrcas she eas Board et latervenor enh regard to geweeg advanoe notace of Apphcans-Staff techascal meet-pnvaleged nature of the -

between thest LBP 83-71 UNION ELEC7RIC COMPANY (Callaway Pleas, Ums 1), Du6 bet No STN 50-443CL engs asul eraassmatang relevant docussents, ao sancticas edt be emposed D

The Conimassaoa lacks the legal autheruy to provide Masocial asustance to asservenors.

( ASLSP Net SI-449414LD, OPERATING l.ICENSE, Ociober 31,1941, INITIAL DECISION havmg been harred frome doses so en successave appropnatecas acts Metropohtaa Ih Co.

A la thas Immal Decanson the Licenses Board resolves all semiassoas maassess am controversy (Three Mde IslaaJ Nuclear Stateos, Unse D. CLI 80-19, il NRC 700 (1980l Pub. L. 97-88, as favor of Apf rame and authernges the Dwector of Natear Reader Reg-a ama upon making d

the requessae GadLags moth sespect to asassers aos resolved sa enhet the Board's Parted lastaal De, t 502 (Dec. 4,1981), Pub. L.97-377,6 Sl2(f) (Dec. 21,19816 36 37 l

DIGESTS DeGESTS

• IML ANC15 Of THE f,TOh8BC SA5ETY LND LICENSING B0LEDS 556UANCES OF Tile AT0401C SAFETY AND L8CEN58NG B04886 LSP 8L74 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY,es at IPerry Nucacar Power E

The qualafsanoes of those saadials who psepared ducumeans are aos poseer ashescas i

Plans. t!=ss I amt 21. Docket Not %4444% 50-4484% Ort RATING LKTNSE, howember of The shrust of a consemason should he dwested so consessag the analyses and com-

10. 1933. MiMOR ANDL?M AND ORDER chasecas of shone saevedushL The Laceansas so.rd esassames 6 hags==h-= sed se respunne so a Board deca on scopea.

F A conseesson lacks bases af a es prema==8 upon a -i==saameng or error wah respass A

ing the enerJ ao secesse wrween evadcace en two quahsy assurance elset='=== The Board con-as the desans whnh are heems r==a*=aae G

Even af a maasser as under ca==%essoa as a generic insin, ther sassacr as a seeksect as a cIsales that the new 6 hags peace the Scard's soncerns as perspectste and persuade a thas-Ilb LK Cosensuch drJ aos have a persasewe practace of usang uncertaf4J quahey assurance coassessom as aus p*A dad es a consessed passeeng.

umpeers ashi 82) that although the frequency of anschag of she appte6ast's Quakty Assierance H

A Lacassag Board does not have pensecison to espicte masacrs beyond shose whach are Ad*aory C

= ed aus fatna apphcant's swa ansernal g ta=,s, nn.s de6c.cacy w mag embraced by the mosace of oppateady for beenas.

cans serious doubt on she =tm=y of apphcams's ganahry asmurance programs If a regulanos prowndes that, as a - certasa.

= muss he met and shone B

Apt sans sausa meet emh of ass guakey assurance --

a esem af susae of the ele-reepss*=-=*= have been met, a ra==*===^= anserang thes a dsNereas analyiss er techasque shoedd 4

ments of ses prograsa mught satsally hate beca "addens" that were aos seguared by the he madnaed as "-

A har===e a anacks shera--a=am's r=y=4=*===

8cs"*"*

LDP-83-77 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMIN ATING COMPANY. es. at (Perry Nuclear Power l

C The remed on guakey asuarance may mas he helJ opes because a party hopes to be able Plant, Umsts I and 2), Docken Nos. 50-448-0L, 50-448-OL (ASLtr No. st-457-04-OL);

so obema =unenes sa the fuswe.

OPERATING LICENSE; December 2. IM3; PARTEAL INITIAL DEC1510N D

The folkw.mg nedsmacal assue a encinned Quakty Asnurance flanpecaut Cern6cassoal.

A The Lucassag Board a====*s a quaissy answanse ca=a*=*aan fimeag thes there were ao l

l t BP-8L75 CLL%1 LAND EttCTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, es at IPerry Nuclear Power quainty assurance de6cteacaes that seriously call saso guesuon apphcams's shehay to coasrol ns electracal contracner, ets coassutsacas to the gesahty of ses plaat, or the safety of any plans j

Pleas Um s I ashi 27. Dun kes Not 50-4440L, 50-4414)L; OP1 a 4 TING LICLNSE; November

- at.

i 15,8981 MtMORANDUM After maahang prehassaary sagi.enes, the Lsensang Boasd d6caJes out se raise sesa spanse 5

Appen&s B to le C F R. Part 50 regiares promes resoluteos of quahey assurance A

i the questaua of =hether or aos reasser operanors are aJege.asely trained no encr====se between defacecacies This standard shoesto be saserpreted as regiering re----hay prorapa re ahariam of reasur lasture and effercas L shts of annaremens imhsres The Board as nasaned shas spe== ares defsacacars l

Prewat!y appised se operator arasams by the appbcame are saumfactory so awood suhesantaal safety C

If a quahty assurance dc6ceency es serious, se ar ass he resolved emmediasely. On the proNems as thrs teme ams thas hagaFpreonty research programs are inader way en order le esapswwe other hand, less sessous defmaeacars or maaor deficiescass se ensica proce& ares snay be resolved time operae6 atmitty to ascnsmanase reassor faelwes frosa sanarament fadures

• prospaly" as a matect of days er==aasha

% hem aH sant's an$ staffi fangs persuade the Board that es was nos passaged as ses pe-D Furthermore, se reviewsms a very large===ha of de6caeacaes, a reasomehicarse standard B

4 l

l'menary conceram abous a posuhle screcess safety assue, the BoarJ nhould denmsms its own concere 7 the poeshshay Lines there udt he some Ismards a the race to raalasaam i

asha aus dedste a sans sponse annue E

The nuamber et apaalsey assurnace em6casacass idensaned as a pines as an===h y== mee-LBP 8L75 A TEX 45 UTILIT!f5 GENE R4 TING COMPANY, es at (Cearbe Peak Saeans Elecars sure of the program's admenscy, en the absence of othet esserpretave sofor= a.n=

Stanon. Unsas I and 28 Do6kes Not 50 445, 50-446.OPER ATING LICENSE; November 25' F

Akhough apphcans has boca found rara ma. for certasa severdy Level IV and Level V 1993, SPICl4L PREllEARING CONFERENCE ORDER quainy v an saaan shes may ancrely represens pertwh=a-wishes as esecouaNy sound The Lacensens Board desmaes no admes a late-Gled contentana en hus functaamat ecstang sysassit A

thanne tIl the Eve criscria for late-fehag, ce balance, are nos sas s6c4 and (28 the consension G

The Board comadered senaamony concermas appesanti asurude and ass respaamsveness so a mas macrete er hogabie because W fasis se specdy any safety problem relance so the hos func-adverse staN E=amye to be relevant.

saanal sesung program thas as she focus of the conscanon LSP 83-78 PUGET SOUND POWER AND L!GHT COMPANY. et al. (Skagit/Hanford Nuc1 ear l

B f see though four of the fate cnsena for late-6has were saanned a laac consentsoa shaR Power Proseca, Umsts I sad 28, Docket Nos. STN 50-522, STN 50-523 ( A51BP No. 75-279-aus he adaunted 4 as a no poorty organized that us conssderahun se the protecang woulii cause og CPI; CONSTRUCTION PERMIT WITHDRAWAL; Deceseher 13, 1983 MEMORANDUM M8h3ue delay AND ORDER C

% consentaon abous hus funcisonal sentang as aos adeusnabie sugerely because W hats dorcas A

The Lseamas Board granes Ap=k=as=* =asaam as withdraw shes agpkasaam and terma-

• I 8"* osassaed from she planti system dunas sestsas anJ dose.as of other sients lound so be mate the procee&agt swotdem, dw.ag the sent. Thew onusasons ami proNems were knoma se ami docusacased by she LSP-83-79 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, es aL (Perry Nuclear Power arpeunt Meres, Inung these nems dues not sne rue so any safety neue concerning the plant Plans, Unas I and 28. Doches Not N M% W AN M% h l

llence, trae hst, unsuppersed by any baan for behesms a safety pobarm canist &ses nos e u 20,1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER the bann har a meucatsun A

The Laccamas Board desses seservenor's==aa a= to reopea descovery 1 EP-8L4 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, en at. eThree Mde Island Nuclear $saama, E

"**"'*d"'*I #"" 8"*8

L' ass 16, l>nct ha W39 I ASLgP g. 33-491444)LA) (Sacasa Generaeor Repent.OPERAT-

'**"*"*" "*' ******'""'d **d*d" ING LICt NSE AMENDMENT. November 29,1983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER naet smaad h generemy wans W LSP. 3-88 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, ce at (Perry Nuclear Power The Lucamas Board asuses a seeinwanduce ams order whsh, saler alaa, rules "'

the aJanneabaty of mascessoas Pleas, Umss I and 2), Doches Nos 50-446-OL,50-4414)L; OPERATING LICENSE; December B

Ihere are nive pwpows for the bass for<cascatsua requeremens sa 10 C F R. ( 2 714 23, M3, MEMORANWM AND ORDER C

The degree of speci6casy requered sovelves the enescane of padgmens by tweases Boards A

The Laceamas Board admats a lasem cascaum cacenug k tem d M i

en a caw-typca,e h-generasars D

10 0 F R. g 2 714 dues aos requ re the peuteen so detml she evidence dwh um he of-3 As anaerwenor that has demonstrated ess abelsty to consnhuse to the developemens of the fered in sus swa of the coe.acataarm Once aJaursed. a consentaon stay be the subsecs of a m record ca a parta ular consentana need not also promane so prevale espers witnesses er outhas lur numsmary espawuon purusans sol 2 74, ther acesimaaay l

33 38 i

l l

l~.-

m d_

DICESTS IWU 4NCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOA::DS a

C By adopams a s6hed de for descovery, the Board saa, nunenvie the potentw,I for deky of the proceedang anJ reduce the negatsve empact of thes cnsenon for late-fahng.

LBP 83-81 TEXAS UTilfTILS GENERATING COMPANY, et at (Comanche Peak Sacans Electne Se nua. Unats I and 2) Docket Nos 50-445, 50-446; OPERATING LICENSE, December 28, a

1983 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A

The Lacenung Buerd finds that apptacant has not demonsrated the custence of a system DIGESTS shes promptly corrects dewga defecaeacies and has not sausfactorary cap 44med several dessa ques-ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS

• DECISIONS taons raised by the satervenor. The Board suggests the need for an andependent dessa revew aams requires apphcant to file a plan that may help to resolve the Board's doubts, 8

Appendas B to Part 50 uf the regulataons requires that there be a quahty assuranca system that wdl prostptly edenufy and correct deficierscars as the demgn of the plant Apphcant DD-83-ll TEX AS UTILITIES GENFRATING COMPANY, et al. (Comanche Peak Sacam Electre may not delay Jewgn revsew untd the plant es scarly complete and cleans that it as thereby Stataoa Unass I and 2), Docket Nos. 50-445, 50-446; OPER 4 TING LICENSE; August 19, comphms orth thas regulatory requirement.

3933, pgggcyog5 DEcgssON UNDIR 10 C.F R. l 2.206 C

The Board amues cntena for as mdependent dessa review that wouu satafy it, including A

The Director of the Office of laspection and Enforcement demes a peutaos pursuant to scafwauons governang the andetiendence and quahfwansons of the review group, rules asunns 10 C.F R. l 2.206 whach requested that the hcensees produce certaan dessga documents or, in organizational endependence duri.sg the revaew, rehabihty measures for the revaew, samphng the ahernauve, shuw cause why they slu.Al not be found is violataos of NRC regulanons af the concerns, the scope of the review (ancludmg in-depth consaderahon of each of the amic'venor's documents are not as thew possessson.

l concerns), methods of documenung and presenting fandmas, prownsons for review of findmss B

A peutaan as not properly brought under 10 C F R. 5 2.206 which requests Jie Drector and provemons for heanngs concernang the farkhnga to grant rehef wheth as methan the power of the presiding omcer sa an NRC adpushcatory prW D

Alleganons should be responded to na a reasoned manner. Generas assurances by ans to grant.

esperts, even af the emperts be betect quahfied, are not satasfactory rewponses to detaded enge C

NRC regadauons do not require licensees to maantain au quahty amurance documentataca i

acenns arguments by a quahfaed engmeer.

pertamang to facatty demgn within thew samediate possession. Lacensees snay delegate the estab-E A stasement by an engmeer that a matter need not be conmJered because of unexplamed hshment and exccuuon of its qumsty assurance program to contractors and other agents but the and otherusse amsupported "engmeermg judgment" as an unsatafactory emplanation se response hcensee retams sespons6bahty for the quakty assurance program.

sa an ensmeerms argument.

DD-83-12 SillPMENTS OF HIGH-LEVEL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WASTE THROUGil F

Unless the Board has reguared that arguments be prevuely fded or ductosed, there as AND TO IL LINOIS; TR ANSPORTATION OF R ADIOACTIVE M ATERIALS; September 13, no prohabitsoa restr clang a party from makms new arguments sa fandmss of fact.

1983; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. l 2.206 G

Becaine of the putentsal capense of complying with an order suggestmg the aced for sa A

The Director of the Omce of Nuclear Matenal Safety anJ Safeguards denies a request uhlependent demsn review, the Board empressed a edhngness to refer ats decasson to the Appeal frona Edwaad Gogol to postpone alt stupments of lugh-level waste through and to !!hnois and to Board. It aho estabhshed a deadhne for motions for reconaderation hoM a sesses of pubhc heanngs on the rhtsve waste sLpmenne il The follo*ms technecal assues are duc:assed U-bolts se pipe supports, can6 hang dowa; 5

The transporta ace of radaoactave mater. sis, ecludmg the transport of irradiated reactor SA-307 steel as fncuoa connectaons; U-botts, tocal stresses on pres; Ptpe support stabahty; Sta.

fuel, is governed by a comprehensave set of regulatsons estabbshed by both the NRC and the behty cf pape supports, Ameracan Weldmg SOCaety Code, app 4Kabably to ataclear plaat; AWS Department of Transportauca.

Code, apphcabihty to nuclear plant; Free-end duplacement, ppes and ppe supports; fhermag DD-83-13 WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (Point Beach Ni. clear Plant, Units I and stresses na pipe supports, U-bolts, fadure from oversorqums, Torquing of U bolts. Over.

2), Docket Nos. 50-2u, 50-301; OPER ATING LICENSE; September 23, 1983; DIRECTOR'S tenssonmg of U-bolts, adequacy of faeld inspection, FacM anspectaos of U-boat tenmotung; Satif DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. 4 2.206 ppe supports; Beta factor for tube-to-sube weMs; Recapping of welds; Engineerms error, manifi.

A The Darcctor of the Office of Inspecuem and Enforcement denses a peuuon submissed by cance of Calculahoe error, sagmfacance c(, Con 6rese stresses, anowable, LOCA forces on upper Wisconsan's Lavoronmental DecaJe requestang assuance of an order to the Wisconma Electric lateral restraans beam, hah-to-wan supports, expensaan stresses, Stalvto-wa5 supports, espanssoa PO*er Company to show cause why the operating hcense for the Pomt 7 teach Nuclear Plant stresses; Floor-to-cedes surports, cupenmon stresses; Espanmon stresses, ppe mapports; Rich.

should not be modified, suspended, or revoked due to senous detenorataos of operator perfor-samnJ saserts Aasal torsson, Rachmond mserts; Quahry asmerance, crganazational i,aterfaces.

mance at the facahty.

DD-83-14 COMMONWEALTil EDISON COMPANY, NEW YORK STATE ENERGY RE-SL ARCil AND DEVELOPMENT AUTilORITY, and WISCONSIN ELECTRIC PGAER COMPANY (Stupment of Irradiated Nuclear Fuel frans % css Vaney, N.Y.), Docket Nos. 50-10, 50-237, 50-249, 50-208, 50-22,50-30l; SPENT FUEL TR ANSPORTATION, September 30, 1983, DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R. l 2.206 A

The Director of the Offace of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards denies petataons by Marvin Resnikoff, on behalf of the Sierra Club, and the State of Ohao, through its Attorney General, requesung that, among other actaons, the Commisuon stay the transport of arradsated nuclear fuel from the Western New York Nuclear Service Center na West Vaney, New York to the Poant Beach and Dresden power reactor mies. The decesson also forms the bass for the unpu-bhshed October 28,1983 denial of the petataan of Fred Mdiar, on behalf of the Envronmental Pohey lastsaute.

B J uthoney of NRC bcensees to t?chwer spent fuel to a carnet for transport is provided by 10 C F R. t 71.72, whah provides a scecral hcense to any hcensee of the Comnusson to trans-port or dehver to a carnet for transport certaan r* -cuve matenal, includmg arradsated reactor fuel en packages for which a Certaficate of Cornpiiance has been assued by the NRC.

Je 41

e DeGESTS DeGESTS sucANCES or mesRCTOe5' DEC1540NS IMSUANCRS Of ptRRCTuSS' DRC3b40NS i

i C

The operanas bcennes of reacsor hcemmecs, pursuans se the Anomsc Emergy Act and 10 DD-83-18 GENERAL PURLic UTILITIES NUCLEAR CORPORATION IThree Mde Isaams C.F R. 66 30.34and le el, authorue.

- el such byproduct and specaal nuclear matenal Nuclear Ow am Unsts I and 2L Docket Nes.54-239, 56-320; REQUEST FOR ACTION.

as smay be produced by the operamon of shew facatstaen. =aump she receses of byproduct and Novensher it,1983.INTEtted DIRECTOP"5 DECISION UNDER le C F R. I 2.286 special nuclear masenal ensiansed at thew fardmes A

The Dwector of the Otsce of Nuclear Reactor Regulassee desses a pesmen by Randy l

D To the essens that the petassoners' concers as le the routes atlocted fur stamaport of the Kang. en behalf of the Three Mde Island Puhenc laserest Resource Center and emers es ne spent fuel armes from 4-*=a== ef highway safety, that concera es washna the parnadicteos of she ennes' that the petmamerC requess seesght se have she NRC pootuhas the licennes from conduchas Deparumens of Trangcetatsee-a load sent of she TMI Unst 2 paler crane er otherwese gushiyag me crane for use.

E The Cosamanaea es takaes ao masor federal action sagasfacanaly adlecians the gushey of DD-53-19 CINCINNATI GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Wdham H. Zamsmer Nuclear Power the hrmas cawwommens such thes preparaten of an._ _

.asal sepect seasement es regassed Stausal, Decket No. 50-354; ENFORCEh4ENT ACTION, December 16.1983. DIRECTOR'S F

Quesssoas of phrsscal secunty concermag movemens of spens fuel are washse she permis-DECISION UNDER 10 CF R. l 2 286 taan of the Nalear Rev= ley CassaunsmeL A

The Detector of the Otsce of legachen and Esfuncemens demes a petama hw by l

G The Safety Analyses Reretts for the Pesas Reach and Dresden facsistaes covered the Thoemas Devane of the Goveressees Acca

.m.a 'y Pnsgact, en behalf of the Miami Vaiter proper functionses of faaet handhag egeupment and spens fuel movesmeas, anchniMg the paessbeh-Power Psogest, sequestang that ec C-take certase achoes esh rewest so the WaReams sees of malfuncison and a fuel drop accelent The C

• s reg *-~ as le C F R. t 50.39 H. h==e* Nuclear Power Sa.nn.

permut incances se change procedures dessnhed as the safety ev=h=*= report unica she chmage savelves a change se the techmacal specifscassess of the hcease or en as mareviewed safety goesnoa The acteams *averved as the reccaps of spens fuel, and the poseassal accadcats and conseguences, are suestar se those sovelved as the packassag and loadsag of spens fuel for eraas-port asay frees a reactor. Sece these actacas, poecatal accalcats and ceasequences have been evaksaned, there as no need for a new safety evahsasace en metres the receaps of spens fuel as the rea1er snee.

DD-83-15 M AINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY (Mause Yankee Anoaue Power saatsoal, Docket Na 50-309. EMERGENCY PLANNING; Sepsember 30, 1983; INTERIM DIRECTOR'S DECIslON UNDER 10 C F.R 6 2.206 A

The Direcict of the Orace of ". ----- and Enforcemens gramas as part, denses as part and defers as part, a pesatsee sabanstaed by David Sensee Mdler es behalf of Seanshee Masse Power and others sequestag that she C sake achus to emuure correcuos of ennesgency plaamseg defacaracaes a$cnnned by the Federal Emergency Maa-pe=e=s Agency and evahnnet the adequacy of State domes 27 as an evacaessoa scuse. Pending she teachassos of these amasters, she petsanoners had regesessed thas the NRC assastate proceedsags to desca=s===e operassee el she Masse Yankee Asoanse Poser Statsast D

The Federal Emergency _. - Agency is se=y==a ha, for evahaaanas the saasus of onesse emergency preparedeem for===ctear power plaats, secludsag the me.9-cy of ev ma=e souses thes may he amed as takms prosectste measures during an esecreency C

The C

- has -*cpaasa graduated approach so emergency plasmag am stuch evac-messoa as eaty one of several p===ha. _.

_ es as emergency.

DD'83-16 CONSUMERS PomER COMPANY (Madland Flama, Umts I and 23. Doches Nos.

50-329, 50 330; MODtFICATION ORDER AND OPER ATING LICENSE; October 6,1983 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER to CF R. 2.206 A

1he Dweesar el the OITace of taspecnon and Enforcemens grants en part and dennes in part, a petman sub=enat by RJhs Pwner Garde of the Goverasacas A--

", Propst, en behalf of the Lane Tsee CeancJ and others, requessing that the NRC take action with regard en the MeSaad pregect DOL 83-I7 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY. et aL (Perry N arte== Power Pleas. Umsts I and 23, Docket Nest 5dM40. ENFORCEMENT ACTION. November 15, 1983, DIRECTOR 3 DECISION UNDER 13 C.F.R t 2.206 A

la sewonie in a sequess by the Oh.Cauces for Resposaham Emergy thas 4Ad==s=8 en-forcessens actaea he taken agasass Cleveland Electne "-

MC. ;- for maaenal false E

seasesacass maar dunng the hccessag revsew for the Perry Nuclear Power Plans, the Dwector of Impectaca and E=fa=*==eas e==heae that a masenal fr%c usasesmens had been anade but that, seven the neversy level of the v=d=*== the appropnase===ena= was a Neece of Yaoissaast -

a

a DIGESTS LMUANCES OF DENIALS OF FETITIONS FOR tl Lent 4EING DFEM-81-3.TATES OF TEEAS, WISCONSIN. MINNESOTA NEVADA. AND UT Alf, Docket No. FIM40-1. RULEM AKING, December 9 198J. DENIAL OF PETITION FOR RULEMAKING The Ce==*== demacs a peessaea for ademakang by erweral Stases who proposed that A

the NRC mhaps cenaan Euranal procedwes for C=- comewrence sa mass gemactanes pre-r-

posed by the Deperument af Emergy for high-levet radenacewe wasne sepossones The ah=anwe Procchere Act et man Gads thas the proposed praedures are aos segared by the she Mucicae Wasse Poincy Act of 1982 amt thaa pehasoners' rancerns are mMressed a hy aefy by she oppurnessy sa pubiscty aderens the C-- om DOE *s maag guedchars beashes the Niadear Wase Feincy Act not she Adm==erassve Frar*Aee Act reguares the S

-- se aders any parucatar procedwes se descreamaame ehethes to coactur se DOE's C

uhag gunarbees C

Nethsag as the Nesdear Wasae Pobcy Act suggeiss thas $4aacs have a specast seae sa the NRC comwreme praess that eeuM -mian-the une of furunal pro 6edures NBC cancwrease as DOE satang guadehmes a aos sistem% under the Adwranee D

Pmcedure Act Under the Nascicar Wasae Feascy Act, DOE messa ehtma NRC coacwrence as any pro-E paard aaremW to the DOE stang gumachecs i

I l

l I

l 1

5 45

---

__a_____

e LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CAsrs AAnhama Peeer Ca Usery4 54 Futry hectear Ptmas. Usses I and 23. ALA5-182. 7 AEC 214,212 (19'47 samerne Le =prA,a-a= d% ermoppet as -

me ps--=4=ge LSP 43-33. It HEC la e 3983s A&m8(seneral hadear Seromes (Sameca f ast Racswess ans Sassage 54ammeJ. ALAS-328,3 NRC 429 419 4 4 psamaras camernas eures as smacrvesurs se HEC,_

^ ;=- ALAS-743,18 htC 411 a 24 419833 Amtssan Cyansens Ca e St=scades Pe.ee Ca. 218 F Sapp 85,89 90 (D Det 19623 ma *=, at asnararyh pendese as annarary me.as e a mamassal e== m LSP43-70,18 HEC 1843 (19838 Astanham Pooce and Lgna Ca ( Asa-haies Our Uma 23. ALAS 94,6 AEC 25,32 (1973) schama me ACR.5 sepens as supwert ter 5**=ve se hesdrh and safety aspects og a.

psesaremst LSP 4157. 38 HEC SIS (1913)

Armed Fescrs 8 hAgy Rewar & Smsdeae (Catshee Saorage F acAry). ALAS 482. I6 MRC 153, 154 a 3 (19821

-w=aes appesonner ser one as aEenemy ma==+=as, saanennt. ALAS 748. IS NRC 350 m2!

t19tla Arme8 Fears E = &=*= 9 Rearasth imma mae GCahnh40 Sm. age Fauimpt. ALASW2. 56 HEC 150 355ea962

= --==-== es appeal as anses mes ase,--y as a h== ALAS 743, t8 hkC 4:? a 22 81981) hara tasume Panama Ca e mars

• armer Corp. 84 F R D 631,635 (E D Pa 59799 l

me+ - as anatorym prs =dese na %.a

-a ma estar prasnarty arsat I

mesame.1SP43-418 hBC I no) (198D

(

hasas tamma Ca aPJgne Manear Pe.cr ts-e=== tjana 23. ALAS-234,8 AEC 4% i19743

.Kam ase ad a Laemans D eses dramas as a name41a1 pessman as anaeswas. ALAS-743. IS NEC 414 (1983s Samus EJune Ca ePasm 9macteur Pomer 5% t;as 2) ALAS 432.13 HEC 98,93 42 (ISSI)

_ af persmas meansa h - LW 81-57,18 kRC a3s iIws3)

Esmama 1.havi Ca IF Agram Matear Pomer Sammen. Umss 2). ALAS 4%. 44 HEC 965 61941) gement 6s __

^ as appetaar p% ones psearca has tres arrammesed. ALAS-755,58 HEC I179 4198la teamt e Phaben Penndeman Ca.434 F 2J 8?) tSe Cs 89813 manere.a puencond t, enaues e pendryr. LAP 43-72,18 ARC 1226 (19833 CaA4masa e man. e43 F 2J 1251. t254 09e Cs 19t2D

+

immers &arreamas need me e Fnant Ea.massacasas har=--r LSP43 M.18 htC 49 l

TIM 3s Cahers Ohss Caesammasts C-o A10,449 F 2J lIW9. Itil, I123 (D C. On 197I3 acad am as.saa. mas sans traens b tame Or -

• ed lue-pesser =w LSP 45 57,18 HEC n

em (19 tis l

Cart laan 5===f e V ES Cart lesen. Scan 48 F S D 318,338 (D D C. 59 eel, afd se opnames teswo. 344 F JJ 9M (D C Cs 8.sest drased Ja9 U S 952 e19673 g

ount pr-=^ - Le esas mas amermann se.cres by enacies e pr=dese. LSP 43-72, t$ HEC 322e 439 tis i

l e

0 6

i e

o l

HGAS. 6 IhBEX IECAL C1 TON EMBEX cases Cases Cammens Pnear mas Egam Ca esm===

an=== %samer Pames Ptems. Less 1. 2. L and 44-Ctensammes EAmmarm.m Ca (Paury hadmar Pseer Ptmas. Uems I and 27. lap 48-24.14 9mSC ALA6 D L948C122(N N 875iF981) r - am.ar ammes as a amur4ent ymmmme as meermans. ALA&743, it m

m-m=.

g tems smessumamma Gar

_ LW43-754. la SueC th) a 6 6t1SH haf a s

I

%SC 413 ENED Chrosemme Ekans % Ca (Ferry hactmer Pnear Plums. Unas I and D. EN45-24. le 9meC I

Commemm Pomer and Egma Ca Wh==== $$ggag Shabsmar PSeer FImms. LGm3 5 2. I. and 48.(LIIILII.

{75,]$pD) Q$${$

f 5I mec 554. Ste47 SNOW

- af sammunt _

af as appmunes a apang hsamma smage. LSP43-37.14 r===a-en meer em pummme ase lemmemme ammmmme af ammes h-gueC Se gimp LEP41% te SeeC meme 4NSD C1r==e==a fw=- Immmmmmmmes Ca (Paury bestmar Puoer Plums. Uemme I and 23. LEP48 42. 34 InSC C-P-Ca e C mmmm. s 2.et e.15.C. NN u 2.

545 U M u l

- no =m== sh. m e===-===re=I a(Ag 74$,,IS NO( 3%$ t3%$3s ggggggggggy g(ggggggggggggggg ggggg -

, $Pj)46, g$ $m$(7$)lI98M

(

Chummma amor Paa A* tur, e swy.-==== af steammes and Comme Dre. 5M f 2J 935.9M C3r=means Eamsara6 hummmmens Ca (Peary feestems Pneer Pines. Unas 8 and D. LW 43-12.17 Imec DCCsNN 22 6Igen

- -af Summed amass em huma af _

af sammast. ALAS-735, as haC 25 431838 enemmes of smaamms en nemene she massed. LN43-55. IS Piec 447 a 4 01838 l

Chan== m gnemmemums As e a US Pemma Surensa.Sae F 23 31 Js740 als Cm 89'5s C3reatmed Shwas mumumanas Ca (Puery hessner Pneer Phas. Umms I med D. LSP4k77.18 9meC a

vams ms.armanamme memF4mmeds tedimmsa Saa smummaar af hue smeer h-LSP4kS7.18 hSC gja$, g3m4 a$ El1SD

[

aM 42%3m ambumunabsp ammmmma of a asutumes and ght.-

af ens==='====

l Canummmen Genand 8w==r Ca 81semum E h=== hw Samune. ALAaL 595. tI haC ame, gy4343, gg pueC 5452 al72 098D SmJ46 429856 C3mseemns Eamssem Ohmmmmmmes Ca (Ptery 36msamer Peeer Pines. Unas I and 23. LDP4k77.18 InSC i

temmesmusam en amps.3 af anaar menemmes

- _ ALAS 74?.10 haCII'm a5 4IMD g3m5.13m440.1J72-73 6198D r==n==.am Gas aus Einsma Ca Omb Ahnen SE h====

hasamer 9='===a, ALA343L 3 3 bec 9e 4398U emuuammt asgester ammmmmus em she names. lap 4148, t8 hSC 3484 a 4 6198D mesanaf assenen mas ame sammessamary. mas seus a=e==== ALA9 734. 84 DSC las i19%D Catum e_ n==n'=a Im&memmi Lama Camp 337 U1544. 546 H9ste Cassmemme Gusmas EnscunaCe 41mbemum St T.ammes ktr= han===.Las H. ALA8 727. 87 hec denungsme af magemmal ander ensaier. ALAS 735. R$ SuSC h (198D l

'tmet 7473 41mD c.sm e w any T - _ - -

Aashamany.M7 FJe 300. 283-84 6Ia Cs 1981) unamanasimm samous esmarena of P==~ =ae==== LEP 4144. Is haC tot tIMM memmemmes mi k-*=aammmes se tems of sepammmmmmmmes af commmet. ALAS 735. IS InSC 25 8983 l

C-- Gan and th1mna t's emma 31 h=== Sh= or= h.=

=a, L3PM22. se bac +33,235 cm n,,, g,,g y==,=e a,3

, gas,,,ggy, g3 PJg 335,3es. 595 49db Cs. 3988) 429 4 mand as useostemme comm4mmeds teemmca far smemmass as ame-pasar hammes. LSP 4557, it ImRC amass ad maC Sans as aussemens meer - -

re======~s==-=am. AL48147. Is hac 438 (198D 114GNGD r=======,= man Edame Ca (Symme 96esiner Peeer Sammme. Unas I and D. ALAS 478. R$ sueC 5438 Ci-== am Gan ame En-Ca (laseumn at T===== h me= h====a. LaPM24. El snac 23 gagan ot9'te aspasaamm at===r==== C134L29.18 >SC t hi H98D Lammmes Sh.ams r --m-um samy =a-- af y==a h e = tassamman L=em n-r-sa.== Cs taymme hadeur Pmmer Smemme. Umss I ans 2). ALAS-735,18 $mSC 19 LSP S138.18 Dec 43 st9tD EIMD C= - Gen amis Eksas Ca (* Aussa is T-hir= Ssaamme. I es D. LSP4247. SS SmeC 4,emagsi mamme g,, w _ "

_ ALAS-742.18 InSC 383 a 5 098D l

2338.1587 4B983 C

- Eamme Ca (synne passamer Poems Smemme. Umms I and D. ALAS 735,88 hStC 39, seems poem en asynemanas ensammme LDP Sk77. Es bar 8M5 mlas t8%33 35 g39g,,

r=a== = Gas and EJamans Ce stamma et Imamms %sarer h= = tems BL LSP4248.15 >SA' eSummemmes es poemacomme amens an suesens #= *==== es unfammaamma amm a she==hm=re af RSet. IS'S 79 (NE38 ensamme mammenomament LSP43-53. IS SeeC 288 8198D

- s anses to she Sass.19P4157. Es haC 519 4t*t38 Cammmunesamm Edame Ca (Jane Samana Uans I and 23. ALAS-396. I AEC 457 (1974) suasammans a

Cassen am 5=de Pgemy 3 Sh0C,5)4 P 3$ 1291. I2%4 & a$ $D C (S I97N gggggggy gg gggggs an Emme '"*"=""F. LEP-II-79. 30 ImOC I488 0903I

-.as- - ad Fans i h====

lap 453m SS hac 40 t3983s r-Edame Ca (Zama Smemme. Peas I and 23. ALAa-236. 8 AEC 388. 3844b i19748 i

l r====="as Saar Paest = >RC.524 F 2s 120s 1297 (D C. Ca 39758 g-

- Imr sesammi mamme. ALAS-749,14 9mSC I118 a 6 4198D smanname Esa smayas -n==-== es a mamme punyama. Lar 4157. B4 hac 523 43%D e

. Eense Ca (Zama Summan, Umms I and 23. ALAS 484. 32 NGC 439. 43611998D l

C)simamma fw== ma -

g Ca 4Penry Swir== fimeer Plans.Less 5 ans 29. ALAM) e hSC g,,,,gg g,,,4,, a,*== un hamme amamenman smosamens. ALAS IM. IS ImSC 3M i898D 745. 755-52 489m Commersamma Law Fensmemame a Wamm.See F. Sage 568.SeS-75 (D edens 89833, assaal rement.

hemas suruuss ad A 4=.a.a - 13P 41e4. as bac seen s' *198D rwum pass 514258 and 83-8365 Hss Ca. mnemed Saar 6.198DD l

Caresamma Enums ensamesens Ce sfummy Naammr Pseer Ptmas. Umas B ans 29. AL AS475. B5 hSC send um --

Gum-tmands amtmaue for mamamme of W k===r lap 43-57. SS MSC l

t3e5 3313 44 H M 3 638 H98D Emmamme e sumer of

-, mesurer. ALAS 748. 83 hac 34 4198D r-EAmma Ca es Imew Yart timens Puest. Uma 23. Al.AS-877. 7 ALC B53 09744 l

C3r.ee=.a rar=== Sasemasmae Ca sPummy Nsans Pseer Fases. L' ann I ans D. ALA8 Min. Se hec hans gas es adersmaamma soeur a ymmuscamme emeur. ALAS-735. It ImAC 25 4198D.

I?5e 175s u s 3 ggP4L13 laheCJOSM98D l

3===a-ausansar asr numswas as=are of===d r===y mesmers. ALAS-73h. 88 MaC 546 aI r

gamme fa es pige Yest Geena Pass. Uma 2). ALAS-ISS. 7 AEC 323. 333-34 61974)

GNS33 eSuss of cammes AA==r es en *===== es a tsemer. LDP4F77. le h8C 53e4 a 6 098D m Ca aPuery her= Pseer Ptmas.Unmus I ans D. ALAS 736. IS hSC bumane - asa amminama and es --

- es een h Carmeemas Eamszuam 145HMD L3P 3343,38 ImeC 5452 m 872 IltSD e aosmans 6mme====a e-===y amares, ALAS 742. R$ hSC 383 a 5 819838 k

l e

a

-A--- -------------

o LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASES CASES Con ohda,ed Ednon Co of Nc= York Undian Pomt Unit 2), CLI 74-23,7 ALC 947,951 (1974)

Commassaan pohcy concernmg post-heniing resolution ofissues LBP-83-57,18 NRC $43 (1983)

Detroit Edison Ca (Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2), ALAB-707,16 NRC 1760,176649 Consolidated Edison Co. of New York (Indian Point, Umt 2), CLI-74-23,7 Af C 947,95152 (1974)

(1982)

Board authority to resolve contested issues Ihat att the ot9ect of ongoing confirmatory analysis at protection of a party's inscrests by 2.206 peution rather than throtagh late antervention; me ckne of the record, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 519 (1983)

ALAB-747,181874,1876 (1983)

Consohdated Edsson Ca of New York (Indian Pomt, Umt 2), CLI-83-16.117 NRC 1006 (1983)

Detroit Edison Ca (Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Umt 2), ALAB 707,16 NRC 1760,1767 jusuficatori for contmums operahon of a plant pendmg FEMA deiermination on state of (1982) emergency preparednew; DD-83-15,18 NRC 742 (1983) assues that are appropriately raised under 2 206 peisuons; ALAB-750,18 NRC 1217 n 39 (1983)

Consolidated Edison Ca of New York (Ind;an Poins, Urut 2), LBP-321,15 NRC 37,41 (1982)

Detroit Edsson Ca (Enrico Ferms Atonuc Power Plant, Umt 2), ALAB-709,17 NRC 17,21 (1983) burden on party seekms to overturn gra'il oflate intervenuon; AL AB-747,18 NRC 1874 (1983) consequence ofintervenor's failure to file proposed findings; LBP-33-43,18 NRC 130 (1983);

Consointated Edison Ca of New York Undian Pomt, Units 1,2 and 3), ALAB-319,3 NILC 188, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 511 a 18 (1983) 189-90 (1976)

Detroet Ldison Ca (Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2), ALAB-730,17 NRC 1057,1065 &

Board hmatations on resolvmg safety issues at operstmg heense stage; ALAB 750,18 NRC 1216 n.7 (1983) 4 (1983) criteria for reopening the record; LBP-83-50, it NRC 246 (1983)

Consumers Power Ca (Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant), ALAB 725,17 NRC 562 (1983)

Detroit Edison Co. (Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Uma 2), LBP-32-%,16 NRC 1408,1422 jurisdictml over exceptions Gled from partial amtial decisions;1 BP-83-77,18 NRC 1395 al66 (1982), affd, ALAB-730,17 NRC 1057 (1983)

(1983) scope of htigable emergency planning issues; ALAB 737,18 NRC 17' n 9 (1983)

Consumers Power Ca (B:s Rock Point Nuclear Plant), ALAB-725,17 NRC $62,56748 (1983)

Detroit Edison Ca (Greenwood Energy Center, Umts 2 and 3), Alas-225,8 AEC 379,380 (1974)

, standard of proof required at the triallevd;i BP-83-55,18 NRC 418 n 8 (1983) documents accompanying monons for disquahficanon; ALAB-749,18 NRC 1897 a I (1983)

Consumers Power Ca (Midland Plant, aJmis Larnt 2), ALAB-101,6 AFC 60,63 (19736 Detroet Edison Ca (Greenwood Energy Center, Units 2 and 3), ALAR-476,7 NRC 759 (1978)

":spreution of timeliness requirement for recusal monon; ALAB-749,18 NRC ll98 a5 (1983) affirmation of Licensmg Board's grant of late-filed peution to intervene; ALAB-743,18 NRC 414 (1983)

Consumers Yowee,Ca (Mediand Plant, Umts 1 and 2), ALAB-123, 6 AEC 331,333 (1973).

Detroit Edison Ca (Greenwood Energy Center, Units 2 and 3), ALAB-476,7 NRC 759,76142 conunued Board consederanon of essues on whKh intervenor tis defaulted, LUP 83-60,18 NRC 676 (1983)

(1978) i importance of potentut for delay of proceeding in balancing of factors for fase intervention; Consumers Power Ca (MkLnd Punt, Units I and 2), ALAB 123,6 AEC 331,333,334 (1973) cutcome of a party's failure to file proposed findmss; LBP-8340,18 NRC.679-80 & n.18 (1983) '

ALAB-743,18 NRC 402,408 all (1983); LBP-33-42,13 NRC 120 (1983); ALAB-747,18 NRC 1879-80 (1983) 7, Consumers Power Co- (Malland Plant, Un is I and 2), ALAB-270, I NRC 47),476 (1975)

Detroit Edason Ca (Greenwood Energy Ccmer, Umts 2 and 3), ALAB-476,7 NRC 759,764 (1978) responsibehties of parues comerning appellate briefs ALAB-739,18 NRP 338 n 4 (1983) j' Consumers Power Co (Midland Plant Units I and 2), ALAB-283,2 NRC 11,17 (1975) late entervenuon pehuoner's responsibility to define scope of its contribution to a sound record; burden of prwf on safety issues L BP-83-58,18 NRC 657 (1983)

ALAB-743,18 NRC 400 (1983); ALAB 747,18 NRC 1877 (1983)

\\ Consumers Power Ca Wikiland Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-458,7 NRC 155,16243 A 't 25 (1978) I Duffield v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.,503 F.2d 512 (4th Cir.1974) source of bias or prejudice that is disquahfying; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1l91 (1983); ALAB-749,18 neope of benefits weighed agamst costs under NLPA; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 631 n 80 (1983)

\\

Couimers Power Ca (Midhnd Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB491,16 NRC 897,914 (1982)

NRC 1203 (1983)

I obhgation of parties in appellate proceedmss to submit relevant new material, ALAB-753,18 Duke Power Ca (Amendment to Materials Licenre SNM-1773 - Transporunon of Spent Fuel from Oconee Nuclear Stanon for Storage at McGuire Nuclear Sianon) ALAB451,14 NRC 307 (1981)

NRC 1210 n.Il 4983) reccept and storage of spent fuel at a facihty other than the one at which it was generated; Consumers Power Ca (Malund Plant Umts I and 2), CLI-83-2,17 NRC 69,70 (1983)

ALAB-741,18 NRC 377 (1983)

, consequences of a party's reveahng informat on under protecove order, LBP-8344,18 NRC 769 Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nuclear Stauon, Umts I and 2), ALAB 687,16 NRC 460 (1982)

(1983)

Board authority to admit a comenhon condiuonally; LBP-8346,18 NRC 7% (1982)

Consumers Power Co (Mktland Plant, Umts I and 2), LBP-82-28,15 NRC 759 (1982), aft'd on '

Duke Power Ca (Caumba Nuclear Stauon, Umts I and 2), ALAB4h7,16 NRC 460 (1982), rev'd in other grounds, ALAB474, IS NRC 1101 (1982) part CLi>3-19,17 NRC 1041 (1983) admiswbehty of electromagnetic pulse contenuons; LBP-83-66,18 NRC 78) (1983)

Consumers Power Co (be tland Plant, Umts I and 2), LBP-8243,16 NRC 578,577 (1982) {:

CUD 5"lcration of recent events in estabhshms good cause for late intervenuon ALAB-743,18 s

NRC 4G8 a12 (1983) umchness of financul quahficauons contention, I bP-83 37,18 NRC 55 (1983)

Duke Power Ca (Caumba Nuticar Stauon, Umts I and 2), ALAB487,16 NRC 460,464 (1982)

Consumers Power Ca (Midland Plant, Umts I and 2) LBP-83-50,17 NRC 242,248 (1983) test apphed by Appeal Board in determming whether to accept Lacensms Board referral of ruhng; content of monons to reopen the record, LBP-83

• 5,18 NRC 417 n 4 (1983)

ALAB-741,18 NRC 375 n 6 (1983) legal standards for recremns the record when entt e record has not been closed; LBP-8J 52* 18 Duke Power Ca (Catawba Nuclear Station, Uruts I and 2), ALAB487,16 NRC 460,469 (1982)

NRC 257 a2 (1983) three-part test for adnusson of unumch contenuons, ALAB@, H E 16 M MSD Council of Southern Mountams, lac v Donovan,635 F.2d 573,580 (D C. Cir.1981) ume hmat for fahng contenuons, ALAB-737,18 NRC 172 n 4 (1983) purpose of nouce and comment; CLf-83-26,18 NRC II42 (1983)

Duke Power Ca (Catawba Nuclear Stauon, Umts I and 2), ALAB487,16 NRC 460. 469-70 (1982)

Detroit Edison Co (Lnrico l'ermi Atomic Power Plant, Uma 2), ALAB-707,16 NRC 1760 (19821 goud cause for late fihng of contentions based on previously unavadable information; LBP-83-39 sflirmation of a Licenwns Board's denial of a 14te-f3cd petiUon to intervene; ALAB-74),18 18 NRC 69 (1983)

NRC 413 (1983)

Duke Power Co (Catawba Nuclear Station, Umts I and 2), CL1-83-19,17 NRC 1041 (1983)

Detroit Edison Co (Enrico Fernu Atomic Power Plant Unit 2), ALAB-707,16 NRC 1760* 1765 admissbihty of contenuon ragardmg plant safety in event of ash erupucn of Mount St liciens; (1982)

LBP-8346, la NRC 784 (1983) showmg necessary, m absence of good cause, on other four factors in order to jm,ify la,a miesvenuon; ALAB-743,18 NRC 395 (1983) 50

$1

e i

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INI)EX CASES CASES Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nuclear Sunon, Umts I and 2), CLI-83-19,17 NRC 1041,1043-44,1045 Florida Power and Light Co. (St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2), ALAB-579,11 NRC 223,225 (1980) a n4,1047,1049 (1983)

Licensmg Board jurisdicuon to decide monon to reopen record where initial decisaan has been criteria for acceptmg late-filed contentions based on previously unavadable, hcensing-related inued, LBP-83-58,18 NRC 643 (1983) documents; CLI.83-23,18 NRC 312,31) (1983); LBP-83-39,18 NRC 61 (1983); LBP-8342, Florida Power and Light Co. (St. Lucie Plant, Uma 2), ALAB-603,12 NRC 30 0980);CLI-81 I2,13 18 NRC 115 (1983); LBP-It)-66,18 N AC 796 (1983)

NRC 838 (1988)

Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nuclear Stauon, Umts I and 2), CLI-8319,17 NRC 1041,1048-49 (1983) need for more strmgent requirenwnts on emergency diesel generators than provided in apphcanon of good cause cntermn to comennons filed after record has closed, LBP-83-58.18 regulations; LBP-8346,18 NRC 792 (1983)

NRC 657 (1983)

Florida Power and Light Co. (St Lucie Plant Unit 2), LBP-81-58,14 NRC 1167 (1981)

Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nu: lea Station, Umts I and 2), LBP-8216,15 NRC 566,587-88 (1982) crateria for apphcation of collateral estoppel to administrative proceedings; '.BP-83-33,18 NRC admissability of electroma tnenc pulse contennons; LBP-8346,18 NRC 783 (1983) 38 (1983)

Duki Power Co. (Cherokee Ne clear Stauon, Units I,2 and 3), ALAB-440,6 NRC 642 0977)

Florida Power and Light Co. (Turkey Pom: Nuclear Generatias Staten, Umts 3 and 4), ALAB 660, affirmation of a Licensms Boerd's denial of a late-filed petition to intervene; ALAB-743,18 14 NRC 987,101) 34 0981)

NRC 413 (1983) curing defects in a Fmal Environmental Statement, LBP-83-36,18 NRC 47,48 (1983)

Duk Power Co. (Cherokee Ni. clear Stauon, Uruts 1,2 and 3), ALAB-440,6 NRC 642,64445 (1977)

Florida Power and Light Co. (Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 3 and 4), LBP-79-21, loss of good cause for late filing of contenuon through reliance on another party's acuens; 10 NRC 183,194-95 (1979)

LBP-83-39,18 NRC 70 0983) abahty of NRC Staff to represent late entervention petitioner's interests; ALAB 747,18 NRC Duka Power Co. (Cherokee Nuclear Station, Units I,2 and 3), ALAB-745,18 NRC 746 (1983) 1874 (1983)

Appe"l Board authority to terminate retained jurisdiction; ALAB-752,18 NRC 1319 n.1 (1983)

Georgia Power Co. (Alvin W. Vogtle Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-291,2 NRC 404,4%

Duke Power Co. (Perkins Nuclear Station, Units I,2 and 3), ALAB431,6 NRC 460 (1977)

(1975) dTirrrtuon of a Licensing Board's demat of a late-filed petsiion to intervene; AL AB-743,18 burden on proponents of a monon to reopen; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1344 (1983)

NRC 413 (1983)

Gibson v. FTC,682 F.2d 554,564 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied,103 S. Ct.152I (1983)

Duks Power Co. (Perkms Nuclear Stauon, Umts I,2 and 3), ALAB-591, il NRC 741,742 0980) interpretation of timelmess requirement for recusal motion; ALAB-749,18 NRC 1l98 n 6 (1983)

Licensmg Board power to rule on the scope of its jurisdichon; LBP-83-58,18 NRC 646 09:3)

Government of the Virgm Islands v. Joseph,685 F.2d 857 (3d Car.1982); Grand Jury Subpoena Duke Power Co. (Perkms Nuclear Stanon. Units I,2 and 3), ALAB-597, il NRC 870 0980)

Deuces Tecum Dated November 16,1974,406 F. Supp. 381 (S D.N.Y 1975) rppe.labihty of parualirutial decision; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 638 0983) apphcanon of attorney chent privilege to commumcataon in presence of third party; LBP-83-70, Duke Power Co (Perkms Nuclear Station Umts I,2 and 3), ALAB 597, il NRC 870,873 0980) 18 NRC 1100 n.1 (1983)

Licensmg Board authority to proceed where it determines it has jurisdiction; LBP-83-58,18 NRC Gray v. Board of liigher Educanon, City of New York,92 F.R.D. 87 (S.D.N.Y.1981) 646 (1983) balancing called for by First Amendment or common law pnvilege in determining whether to Duplan Corp. v. Deerms Melhken, Inc.,397 F. Supp 1846 (D S.C.1974) release mformanon under protective order; LBP-83-53,18 NRC 288 n.3 0983) purpose of rule for waver of attorney-chent privdege; LBP-83-70,18 NRC 1102 0983)

Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, d'4 F.2d $41, 85I (D.C. Cir.1970), cers. denied,403 U S.

Duquesne Light Co. (Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 1), ALAB-403,5 NRC 1343,1386 (1977) 923 0 971)

NRC Staliresoluuon of safety issues; ALAB-750,18 NRC 1214 0983) 1icensms Board responsibihties in resolvmg usues; ALAB-740,18 NRC 367 n.103 0983)

Duquesne Light Co. (Beaver Valley Power Stauon, Umt 2), ALAB-208,7 AEC 959 (1974)

Gulf States Utiliucs Co. (River Bend Stauon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-358,4 NRC 558 0976) rflirmation of a Licensms Board's denial of a late-filed petition to intervene; ALAB-743,18 disnussal of interverw following change of residence to area not in proximity to reactor; NRC 414 (1983)

LBP-83 59, I8 NRC 670 n.3 (1983)

Duquesne Light Co. (Beaver Valley Power Station, Umt 2), ALAB 240,8 AEC 829,833,840 0974)

Gulf States Unhues Co. (River Bend Stauon Units I and 2), ALAB-444,6 NRC 760 (1977) htigabehty of construction quahiy assurarxe contenhons at operating license stage; LBP-8346,18 admissabehty of generic issues as subjects of contenuons in contested proceed:ngs, LBP-83-76,18 NRC 785 (1983)

NRC 12710983)

Ecolo;y Acuon v. AEC,492 F.2d 998,1000-02 (2nd Cir.1974)

Gulf States Unlines Co. (River Bend Stanon, Umts I and 2) ALAB-444,6 NRC 760,772 0977) curms defects in a Fmal Environmental Statement; LBP-83-36,18 NRC 47,48 0983) flexibahty in determmms acceptable way to comply with regulations; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 507 EPA v. Mink,410 U S. 73,87-88 0973) 0983) court procedure for examming matenals covered by executive pnvilege; LBP-83 72,18 NRC Gulf States Uuhdes Co. (River Bend Stauon, Units I and 2), ALAB-444,6 NRC 760,774 0977) 1226 0 983) findmg necessary for issuance of an operating license for a nuclear power plant; LBP-83-57,18 Essex County Preservanon Ass'n v. Campbell,536 F.2d 956,960-61 (1st Car.1976)

NRC 464 (1983) need to reevaluate cost benefit balance for assuance of low-power license; LBP-83-57,18 NRC Gulf States Uuhues Co. (River send Station Units I and 2), ALAB-444,6 NRC 160,774,775 0977) 630 (1983) opcrauon of a nuclear power plant pending resoluuon of genenc unresolved safety issues; Federal Power Commission v. Ilope Natural Gas Co.,320 U.S. 591, td)3 0944) j LBP-83 57,18 NRC 472 0983) duty of State regulatorv tahes to estabhsh rates coverms costs engendered by nuclear facihty llamm v. Members of Board of Aegents cf State of Florida. 708 F.2d 647,651 Olth Cir.1983), reh's hcenses; LDP-83-37,18 NRC 58 0983) j demed,715 F.2d 580 Olth Cir.1983)

Florida Power and Light Co. (St. Lucie Plant, Uma 2), ALAB-404,5 NRC 1185,1186 n 2 0977) l standard for judgms tuas or prejudwe on part of presidmg omccr; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1887 hkchhood of party seekmg stay pendmg appeal of prevaihng on the ments; LBP-83-40,18 NRC (1983) 97 0 983) llouston Lighting and Power Co. ( Allens Creelt Nuclear Generating Stauon, Unit I), ALAB-535,9 Flonda Power and Light Co. (St. Luue Plant Umt 2), ALAB-420,6 NRC 8 0977), alt'd, CLI-78-12, NRC 377,386-87 0979) 7 NRC 939 0978) improper hmitauons on scope of contentions, LBP-83 73,18 NRC 1234 0983) alTirmation of Licensms Board's grant oflate-filed petition to intervene; ALAB 74),18 NBC 414 0983)

$3 i

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX e

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASES CASES llouston Lightmg and Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Generahng Stahon, Unit D. ALAB 535,9 NRC 377,389-400 (1979) llouston Lighting and Power Co. (Soutt Texas Project. Unsts I and 2), CLI-80-32. I2 NRC 281 need to idenufy members of orgamration petinonmg for intervention LBP-83 59,18 NRC 669 (1980)

(1983) husatmiity of contenten questioning character and competence of apphcant to operate a nuclear flouston Lighting and Power Co. ( Allens Creek Ni: clear Generating Station, Umt I), ALAB 535,9 power plant; LBP-83 58,18 NRC 649 (1983)

NRC 377,400 (1979) llouston Lighung and Power Co. (South Texas Project Uruts I and 2), CLI-82-9 IS NRC 1363 basis for disclosure of mformation under a protective order; ALAB-735,18 NRC 25 (1983)

(1982) cffecuveness of protective orders to prevent disclosure of information that is the subject of source of daquahiying bias; ALAB-751,18 NRC 1315 a 2 (1983); ALAB-749,18 NRC 1897 ongoms investigahons; LEP-83 53,18 NRC 288 (1983)

(1983) llouston Lighting and Power Co. ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generatmg Station, Unit I), ALAB 539,9 llouston Lighuas and Power Co. (South Texas Project Units I and 2), CLI-82-9,15 NRC 1363,1365 NRC 422 (1979)

(1982) need for a Board to renotice an opportunity to intervene; LBP-83 73,18 NRC 1233,1234 (1983) standard for disquahncation of a presidmg judge; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1187, Il91; ALAB-749,18 Ilouston Lighting and Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Generatmg Stauon, Umt 1), AL AB-590, Il NRC 1202-03 (1983)

NRC 542 (1980) llouston Lishung and Power Co. (South Texas Project, Uruts I and 2), LBP-75-71,2 NRC 594, degree of speciGcity required in support of contentions; LBP-83 76,18 NRC 12t 9 n.2 (1983) 914 lo (1975), aff*d, ALAB-306,3 NRC 14 (1976) llouston Lightmg and Power Co. ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generatmg Stahon, Umt I). ALAB-590, Il tamms and scope of considershon of apphcant's Gnancial quahfcahons; LBP-83-37,18 NRC 54 55 (1983)

NRC 542,150 (1989 consideranon of ments of contentons at the pleadmg stage; LBP 33-66,18 NRC 789 (1983) llunydee v. United States,355 F.2d 183 (9th Cir.1%5p floucon Lightmg and Power Co. ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generatmg Staten, Uma D. AL AB429,13 apphcation of attorney-client pnvilege to communication in presence of third party; LBP-83-70, NRC 75 (1981) 18 NRC 1100 n.I (1983) tht in which confhetmg sindavits and record must be viewed when response to summary IBM Corp.,613 F.2d 923,928 (2d Cir.1980) disposmon mohon is received; LBP-83-46,18 NRC 223 (1983) standard for demonstraung bias from extrajudicial source; ALAB-749,18 NRC 5200 n.I5 (1983) flouston Lighting and Power Co. ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generahng Staton, Unit I). ALAB429,13 IBM Corp.,618 F.2d 923,929 (2d. Cir.1980)

NRC 75,77 n.2 (1981) limitation on standard of conduct leadmg to disquahGcation of a Licensing Board judge; types of appeals that are inscriocutory, and their disposnion; ALAB 736,18 NRC 166 (1983)

AL AB-7481191,1193; AL AB-7491203 (1983) llouston Lighting and Power Co. ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generstmg Stauon, Unit I), ALAB435,13 IBM v. Sperry Rand Corp.,44 F.R.D.10,13 (D. Del.1%8)

NRC 309,310 (1981) scope of waiver of attorney-client privilege; LBP-83 70,18 NRC 1802 (1983) potential for future hugation as cause for directed cerufication; ALAB-737,18 NRC 176 n.12 Ilknois v. NRC,591 F.2d 12 (7th Cir.1979)

(1983) proceeding or hearms on mierventon rights triggered by request for action under 10 C.F.R.

Ilouwon Lighting and Power Co. ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Statmn, Umt I). ALAB435,13 2.206; DD-8314,18 NRC 728 n.1 (1983)

NRC 309,310-11 (1981) lowa Electric Light and Power Co. (Duar,e Arnold Energy Center), ALAB-108,6 AEC 195 (1973)

Licensing Board error as jusufication for directed certaGcation; ALAB 741,18 NRC 374 n.4 alTirmaten of a Licensmg Board's denial of a late-Gled petsuon to intervene; ALAB-743,18 (1983)

NRC 414 (1983) occurrence oflegal error as jusuncation for interlocutory appellate review; ALAB-734,18 NRC Johnson v. Tructiond,629 F.2d 287,291-92 (3d Cir.1980) 15 (1983) hmnation on standard of conduct leading to disquahreation of a Licensing Board judge; proper forum for addressms adequacy of Staffs environmental analysis; AlaB-742,18 NRC 385 ALAB-7481891,1193; ALAB-749 I203 (1933) n.12 (1983)

Kaiser Alummum & Chemical Corp. v. Umted States,157 F. Supp. 939,946 (Ct. Cl.1958) llouston Lighting and Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Generstmg Station Unit I), ALAB471,15 hmuanons on executive privdege; LBP-83-72,18 NRC 1227 (1983)

NRC 508 (1982)

Kansas Gas and Eiccaric Co. (Wolf Creck Generating Stahon, Umt I), ALAB 279,1 NRC 559,576 afGrmaten of a Licensing Board's denial of a late-Gled petuion to rniervene; ALAB-743,18 (1975) purpose of basis-wnh-specsGcaly requirement for contentions; LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1268 n.1 NRC 413 (1983) liouston Lightmg and Power Co. ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generatmg Stauon, Umt I), ALAB471,15 (19838 Kansas Gas and Electnc Co. (Wolf Creek Generatmg Stanon. Unit I), ALAB-462,7 NRC 320,338 NRC 508,513 n.14 (1982) determmauve factor when considering late intervention petitions; ALAB-743,18 NRC 412 n.29 (1978) burden on proponent of monon to reopen ALAB-738,18 NRC 180 (1983); ALAB-75),18 NRC (1983) llouston Lightmg and Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Generatmg Staten Uruts I and 2),

1324 (1983); ALAB-756,18 NRC 1344 (1983); LBP 83-50,18 NRC 247 (1983)

Kansas Gas and Liectre Co. (Wolf Creek Generating Stanon, Uma l), ALAB-462,7 NRC 320,338 ALAB-301,2 NRC 853 (1975)

(1978) rppealabihty of partial imtsat decision; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 638 (1983) llouston Lighting and Power Co. (South Texas Project, Umts I and 21, ALAB439,13 NRC 469,472, criteria that a motion to reopen vnust satisfy; ALAB-738,18 NRC 180 (1983);I BP-83-48,18 NRC 108 (1983) 477 (majonly),484-85 (dissent) (1981) basis for disclosure ofinformation under a protective order; ALAB-735,18 NRC 25 (1983);

• Kinoy v. Machell,67 F R.D.1 (S.D N.Y.1975) material covered absolutely by execuuve privdege; LBP-83-72,18 NRC 1225 (1983)

LBP-83 53,18 NRC 288 (1983) llouston Lighting and Power Co. (South Texas Project, Umts I and 2), ALAB-672,15 NRC 677,683 Konias, Inc., Village of Uyak v. Andrus,580 F.2d 601 (D C. Cir.), cert. demed,493 U.S.1052 (1978) apphcation of judicial standards to administrative proceedmas; ALAB-743,18 NRC 412 n.25 (1982), rev'd on other grounds, CLI-82-9,15 NRC 1363 (1982)

(1983) andsvidual 40 whom a recusal monon is directed; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1l86 n.l (198h i

54 55

e LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES CASES Long Island Lightmg Co. Oar esport Nuclear Power Stanon, Units I and 2), ALAB-292,2 NRC 631 Louisana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electric Staten Unit 3), ALAB-732,17 NRC 1076, (1975) 1110-13 (1983) afGrmauon of a Licensms Board's denial of a late-Gled pennon to intervene; ALAB-743,18 catent of Licenwng Board scruuny of uncontested generic unresolved safety assues. LBP-83-57, NRC 414 (1933) 18 NRC 465 (1983) precedent concerning views ofintervenors in NRC proceedmss, ALA B-743,18 NRC 411 n.24 Louisaana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Liectric Stauon, Uma 3), LBP-82100,16 NRC g3933) 1550 (1982)

Long Island Lighting Co. Gamesport NucIcar Power Stauon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-292,2 NRC 631, effechveness of partial iniual decisions; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1395 n.165 (1983) 650 z 25 (1975)

Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Sicam Electnc Station, Uma 3), LBP-82-100,16 NRC cnierta for judgms potenual that late intervenuon has for delaying completion of a kroceedms; 1550,1567 (1982), ard, ALABM32,17 NRC 1076,1094 n.25 (1983)

ALAB-747,18 NRC 1180 (1983) pohey concerning distnbution of potassium iodide for public use during radiological emergencies; Long Island Lightmg Co. Gamesport Nuclear Power Station, Units I and 2), ALAB-628,13 NRC 24, LBP-83-71,18 NRC 1109 n.13 (1983) 25 (1981)

Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Watesford Steam Electric Stauon, Umt 3), LBP-83-27,17 NRC 949 authority to revoke limited work authorization when facahty has been cancelled; AL AB-755,18 (1983)

NRC 1339 n 4 (1983) distmction between pubhc information brochures on emergency planning and EBS messages, Long Island Lightmg Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit 1). ALAB-743,18 NRC 387, LBP 83-68,18 NRC 943 (1983) 395-96 (1983)

Magnaleasing, Inc. v. Staten Island Mall,76 F.R D. 559 (S.D.N Y.1977) wet a given to Licensms Board's judgment in balancmg late intervenuon factors; ALAB-747,18 apphcation of actorney chent privilege to comn'umcanon in presence of third party; LBP-83-70, h

NRC 1871 (1983) 18 NRC 1800 (1983)

Long Island Lightmg Co. (Shorenam Nuclear Power Stauon, Umt I), ALAB.743,18 NRC 387, Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. (Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station). ALAB-161,6 AEC 1003, 398-99 (1983) 1004 (1973),aTd sub nom. Ciutens for Safe Power v. NRC,524 F.2d 1291 (D C Cir.1975) wet e given to ennent of a petitioner's delay in seeking intervention; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1173 heakh and safety standard required for issuance of operstmg license; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1345 h

(1983)

(1983)

Long Island Lightmg Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stauon, Uma l), ALAB-743,18 NRC 387, degree of quahty expected in construction of nuclear power plants; ALAB-740,18 NRC 346 n.1 399CD (1983)

(1983) t te 63:ervention petiuoner's responsabihty to deGne scope ofits contribution to a sound record, Maine Yankee Asomic Power Co. (Mame Yankee Atomic Power Station). ALAB 161,6 AEC 1003, AL AB.747,18 NRC 1877 (1983) 1010 (1973)

Long Island Lightmg Co. (Shoreham Nuc! car Power Stanon Umt 1) ALAB 743,18 NRC 387, effect of existing deficiencies on authorizauon of a license; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1368 n 6 (1983) 399 4)2, 407 (1983) relauonship between seriousness of a violation and the consequences of that violanon; matters to be evaluated in determming peutioner's abihty to contnbute to a sound record, LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1452 n.172 (1983)

AL AB-747,18 NRC 1882 n.2 (1983)

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. (Maine Yankee Atomic Power Stanon) ALAB-161,6 AEC 1003' Long Island Lightmg Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit 1), ALAB-743,18 NRC 387, 1014 (1973), af1'd sub nom. Ciuzens for Safe Power, Inc. v. NRC,524 F.2d 1291,1301 (D C. Cit.

40041(1983) 1975) consaderauon given to late intervention peuuoner's participation m carher procee hng for same need for supplemental environmental impact statement g wr to issuance of low-power license; facihty; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1878 (1983)

LBP-83-57,18 NRC 627,628 (1983)

Long Island Lighung Co (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit 1), LBP 82-82,16 NRC 1844, Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. (Mame Yankee Atomic Power Station) ALAB-166,6 AEC l148, l16445 (1982)

II5O n.7 (1973) documents covered by executive pnvdege; LBP-83-72,18 NRC 1225 (1983) responses to monons for reconsideration; LBP-83-49,';8 NRC 240 n.1 (1983)

Long bland Lightmg Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stauon, Uma D. LBP-83-30,17 NRC 1832,1843 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co (Maine Yankee Atomic Power Stanon),CLI-83 21,18 NRC 157 (1983)

(1983), aff's DD-83-2,17 NRC 327 (1983) standards apphcable to reopemns records; LBP-83 58,18 NRC 663 (1983) adequacy of petiuoner's assumphon that facensee would det.berately fad to report Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electric Stanon, Uma 3), ALAB-220,8 AEC 93 nonconformances as basis for a contenuon; DD-8319,18 NRC 1468 (1983)

(1974)

Mame Yankee Atoms Power Co. (Mame Yankee Atomic Power Stauon), CLI-83-21,18 NRC 157' types of appeals that are interlocutory, and their disposnion; ALAB-736,18 NRC 166 n I (1983) 160, 162 (1913)

Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electric Stanon, Unit 3), ALAB-690,16 NRC 893, g

discussion oflink between pubhc heahh and safety concerns and apphcant's Gnancial 894 (1982) 1 quahGcations; LBP-83-52A,18 NRC 274-72 (1983)

Licensms Board acuons which are appealabic; LBP-83-77, is NRC 1394 n.164 (1983) i Marcus v. Director, OfLce of Workers' Compensahon Programs,548 F.2d 1044,1051 (D C Cir.1976)

Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Flectric Stauon, Unt 3), ALAB-732,17 NRC 1076, l

importance of umely films of disquahficapon monons; ALAB-757, l*; NRC 1360 n 20 (1983) 1096 n.30 (1983) l interpretation of tamchness requirement for recusal motion; ALAB-749,18 NRC 1198 n.4 (1983) impc tance of cross-exammahon in developmg a complete record; ALAB-747,18 NRC 18 82 i

MCI Commumcations Corp. v. AT&T,85 F.R.D. 28 (N D. Ill.1979)

(1983) 3 Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electric Station, Umt 3), ALAB-732,17 NRC 1036, I

imposinon of ume hmits on cross-exammation; LBP-83-68,18 NRC 841 n.7 (1983)

Metropolita Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon, Unia I). ALAB498,16 NRC 1290, 1104 (1983) 1298-99 (1982)

(mergency planning Gndmgs necessary pnor to issuance of operaung hcense; LBP-83-60,18 NRC flexibihty in determming acceptable way to comply wah regulanons; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 507 678 n.16 (1983)

(1983) i i

i t

l 56 57

e a

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES M.tropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Sianon, Uma D, ALAB498,16 NRC 1290, Mississippi Power and Light Co. (Grand Gulf Nalear Stauon, Units I and 2), ALAB-130,6 AEC 423, 426 (1973) 1323 (1982), rev'd, CLI-83-22,18 NRC 299 (1983) tre ament of issues not necessary to a decision on appeal; ALAB 743,18 NRC 411 n.22 (1983) degree of specifkity required in support of contentions; LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1269 n 2 (1983)

Metropohtan Edison Co. O hree Mile Island Nuclear Stauon, Uma I), ALAB499, lei NRC I324 Missnsippi Power and Light Co. (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-704,16 NilC 1725 (1982)

(1982) alTirmadan of a Licensing Board's denial of a late-fded pehuon to intervene; ALAB-743,18 junsdiction to rule on pention for reconssderation following issuance of iniual decision; NRC 413 (1983)

.LBP-83-58,18 NRC 643-44 (1983) showing necessary on other cntena for acceptance of late-Gled contenuons where good cause has Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon. Umt 1), ALAB 708,16 NRC 1770 not been shown, LBP-83-58,18 NRC 663 (1983)

(1982)

Massassippe Power and Light Co. (Grand Gulf Nuclear Stanon, Umts I and 2) ALAB-704,16 NRC admissibdity of decay heat removal contenuon; LBP-83-66,18 NRC 786 (1983) 1725, 1730 (1982)

Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Uma 1), ALAB-729,11 NRC 814, importance of petitioner's abihty to contnbute to sound record, in evaluaung Ute intervention 827 28 (1983) petiuon, AI.AB 743,18 NRC 399 (1983); LDP-83-42,18 NRC 419 (1983) standard for judgmg adequacy of a testing program; LBP 83-57,18 NRC 523 (1983) late intervenuon petsuoner's responsibility to deGr,e scope ofits coninbution to a sound record; Metropoht n Edison Co. (Three Mde Island Fuclear Station, Umt I), ALAB 729,17 NRC 814, ALAB-747,18 NRC i177 (1983) 829 55 (1983)

• cight given to entent of a peutioner's delay in seeking mtervenuon; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1873 admissibehty of decay heat removal contention; LBP-83-66,18 NRC 786 (1983)

(1983)

Maropohton Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Statmn, Umt 1), ALAB 729,17 NRC 814,834, Nader v. NRC,513 F.2d 1045,1052-54 (D C. Cir.1975); Nader v. Ray,363 F. Supp. 946,954 gg7.gg (1933)

(D D C.1973) post-heanns resolution of issues by NRC Staff, ALAB-746,18 NRC 755 (1984) safety standards apphed in determmmg efGcacy of eddy current testmg to detect Gaws in sleeved M.tropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stauon, Uma 1), AL AB-729,17 NRC 8:4,373 steam generator tubes; ALAB-739,18 NRC 340 (1983) et seq. (1983)

New England Coahuon v. NRC,582 F.2d 87,93-94 (1st Cir.1978) denmuon of"important to safety"; LBP-83 57,18 NRC 556 (143) snodifwaten of Final Environmental Statement; LBP-83-36,18 NRC 48 (1983)

Metropohian Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Uma II, ALAB 729,17 NRC 814, New Erigland Power Co- (NEP, Umts I and 2), LBP-78-9. 7 NRC 27),279 (1978) 885-88 (1983)

Licensms Board jurisdiction to supplement Fmal Environmental Statement; LBP-83-36,18 NRC post-hearing resolution of issues by the Staff, LBP-83-57, is NRC 519,520 n.21 (1983) 48-49 (1983)

Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Umt I), ALAB 738,18 NRC 177,180 New York State Energy Research and Development Authonty v. Nuclear Fuci Services,Inc.,561 F.

(g9g33 Supp. 954 (W.D.N.Y.1983) test for reopenmg a record, ALAB-750,18 NRC 1207 (1983); ALAB 753,18 NRC 1324 (1983) duty of unhties to remove fuct from storage facdity at demand of omrier; DD-83-14,18 NRC 730 Metropoht:n Edison Co. (Three Mile Islas 4 Nuclear Staton, Unit I), CLI.80-16,11 NRC 674,675 n.3 (1983)

(1980)

MR8 v. Interstate Dress Carners,610 F.2d 99 (3d Cir.1979) forum to consider quesuon of additionat safety factors to deal wnh degraded core condinons; propriety of parallel civil and cnmmal proceedmas, CL1-83-24,18 NRC 322 (1983)

LBP-83 39,18 NRC 88 (1983)

Northern Indiana Pubhc Seruce Co. (Badly Generating Station, Nuclear 1), ALAB-227,8 ALC 416, Metropolitan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unis D, CLI-80-19, il NRC 700 (1980) 438II974)

Commission authonty to provide Gnancial assistance to intervenors; LBP-83 73,18 NRC 1239 burden on proponents of a monon to reopen; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1344 (1983)

(1983)

Northern States Power Co. (Monucello Nuclear Generstmg Plant, Uma 1), CLI-72-31,5 AEC 25,26 M riropolitan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon, Urut I), CLI-83 22,17 NRC 299,309 (1972)

(1983) ground for waiver of rule barring consideration of Gnancial quahficauons contenuon; LBP-83-37,

st of adequacy of an emergency plan; I BP-83-60,18 NRC 678 n.16 (1983) 18 NRC 57 (1983)

Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon, Unit I), CLI-83 25,18 NRC 329,332 Northern States Power Co. (Prairie Island Nuclear Generstmg Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-244,8 (1983)

AEC 857,864 (1974) consideration of recent events in establishing good cause for late intervenison; ALAB-743, lg conunued Board consderation on issues on which intervenor has defaulted, L BP-83-60,18 NRC NRC 408 n.12 (1983) 676 (1983)

Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mde Island Nuclear Station, Uma l), LBP-81-59,14 NRC 1211, Northern States Power Co. (Praine Island Nuclear Genersung Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-252,8 1664-70 (1981),alTd, ALAB-697,16 NRC 1265 (1982)

{

AEC 1175 (1975) policy concernmg distnbution of potassium iodide for pubhc use dunns radiological emergencies; l

ampmumn of urne hmits on cross-exammatica; LBP-83-68,18 NRC 541 n.7 (1983)

LBP-83-71,18 NRC 1109 n 13 (1983)

Northern States Power Co. (Prairie Island Nuclear Generaung Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-252,8 Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Uma 2), ALAB-486,8 NRC 9,21 (1978)

AEC 1875 (1975), alTd, CL1-75-1. I NRC 1 (1975) burden on proponent of mouon to reopen the record; LBP-83-50,18 NRC 247,248 (1983) appealabilit/ of decision in whwh contentions were rassed as Board issues; LBP-83-58,18 NRC Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon, Umt 2), ALAB-570,10 NRC 679 (1979) 647 (1983) def tral of proceedmss where construction has been suspended; LBP-83-66,18 NRC 800 (1983)

Northern Staics Power Co. (Praine Island Nuclear Generating Plant Umts I and 2), ALAB-343,4 Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon, Umt 2), CLI-80-22,11 NRC 724 (1980)

NRC 169,171 (1976)

NRC authonty to conduct invesugation while Grand Jury investigation is under way; C1183-24, status of studies f rnuluple s: cam generator tube fadures; ALAB-739,18 NRC 340 n 8 (1983) 18 NRC 319,320 (1983)

Northern States Power Co. (Tyrone Energy Park, Umt I), CLI-80-36,12 NRC 523 (1980) miertsts which do not confer standmg for purposes of miervenuon; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 332 n.4 (1983) 58

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES LEGAL CITATIONS IN!EX CASES Northera States Power Co. (Tyrone Energy Park, Unit I), CLI-80-36,12 NRC 523,527 (1980) fams of petitson by interested state as cause for a hearms; LBP-83-45,18 NRC 216 (1983)

Pactfe Gas and Electac Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-598,11 Nuclear Engineerms Co. (Shemeld, Ilknois, Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Sae), ALAB-47),

NRC 876,879 (1980) 7 NRC 737 (1978) test for reopening a record; ALAB-750,18 NRC I207 (1983) mtervention by party supporting license application; ALAB-743,18 NRC 390 n.4 (1983) -

Pacak Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-600,12 tests for determming an inservention pentioner's standms; LBP-83-65,18 NRC 777 (1983)

NRC 3 (1980)

Nuclear Engineering Co. (Sheincid, Ilhnois, Low-Level Radsoactive Waste Disposal Site). ALAB-606, basis for disclosure ofinformation under a protective order; ALAB 735,18 NRC 25 (1983);

12 NRC 156,160 (1980)

LBP-83-53,18 NRC 288 (1983)

Liccasms Board actions which are appealable; LBP 83-77,18 NRC 1394 n.164 (1983)

Pacifs Gas and Electnc Co. (Diablo Canyen Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-728,17 Nuclear Fuel Services, inc- (West Valley Reprocessing Plant), CLI-75-4,1 NRC 273 (1975)

NRC 777,793-95 & n.46 (1983) factors balanced in ruling on late intervention; CLI-83 25,18 NRC 331 (1983) need for supplemental environmental impact statement prior to issuance of low-power license; reversal of Licensing Board denial of late-Gled petnion to intervene; ALAB 743, l* r4RC 414 LBP-83-57,18 NRC 624-27 (1933)

(1983)

PaciG,:'las and Elecinc Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-728,17 weight given to a petitiorwr's failure to estabhsh good cause for late mtervenuon; ALAB 743,17 NRC 777,793-95 (1983)

NRC 413 n.30 (1983) consderauen of adequacy of StaN tevicw of operating hcense apphcation in operating hcense Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. (West Vaney Reprocessing Plant), CLI-75-4,1 NRC 273,275 (197%

proceedms; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 565 n.29 (1983)

Lic;nsmg Board discreuon in grant of unumely anterventson peuuon; ALAB-747,18 NP41871 Pacife Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units I and 2), ALAB-728,17

([983)

NRC 777,800 n.66 (1983)

Nuclear Fuel Services, ine- (West Valle> Reprocessms Plant), CLf 75-4,1 NRC 2D,115,276 standards for reopening a record; LBP-83-41,18 NRC 108 (1983)

(IS75); ALAB 263. I NRC 208 220-21 (1975)

Pacife Gas and Ekctric Co. (Diablo Canyt,n Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-728,17 frequency of reversals of Licensms Board denials oflate ;ntervennon; ALAB-743,18 h AC 3%

NRC 777,306 07 (1983).

n.36 (1983) eatent of Licensing Board scrutiny of uncontested generic unresolved safety issues; LBP-83-57, Nuclear Fuel Services,Inc. (Western New York Nuclear Service Center), ALAB-679,16 NRC 121 IS NRC 465 (1983) 126 (1982)

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-728,17 hmitauons on NRC's review of West Valley Demonstrauon Project DD-83-14,18 NRC 732 NRC 777,807 (1983)

(1983) basis for findmg wahdity of a contention; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 576 n.33 (1983)

Offshore Power Systems (Floating Nuckar Power Plants). ALAB-489,8 NRC 194,199-208 (1978)

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), CLI-76-1,3 NRC niationslup between NRC Staff and Licensing Boards; LBP 83-40,18 NRC 97,102 (1983) 73 (1976)

Offshots Power Systems (Floatmg Nuclear Power Plants), ALAB-489,8 NRC 194,206-07 (1978)

Licensing Board jurisdction to stay effectiveness of Special Nuclear Materials License; Lictnsms Board jurisdiction to supplement Final Environmental Statement; LBP-83-36,18 NRC LBP 83-38,18 NRC 63 (1983) 48-49 (1983)

Pacifs Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2) CLI-80-4, il NRC Otinhore Power Systems (Manulacturing License for Floating Nuclear Power Plants) ALAB489,16 418 (1980)

NRC 887,890 (1982) individual to whom a recusal motion is directed ALAB-748,18 NRC 1186 n.1 (1983)

Appeal Board authonty to conduct sua sponte review of partialimtial decasion; ALAll-753,18 Pacife Gas and Electric Co. IDiablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), CLI-80-24, il NRC 1323 n.1 (1983)

NRC 775 (1980); ALAB-410,5 NRC 1398 (1977); ALAB-580, il NRC 227 (1980); ALAB-592* 11 Pacific Gas and Electre Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. Units I and 2), ALAB-223,8 AEC NRC 744 (1980); ALAB-600,12 NRC 3 (1983) 241 (1974) balance between measures used to protect sensiuve information and rights of parties in afGrmahon of Licensing Board's grant oflate Gled petiuon to intervene; ALAB-743,18 NRC 414 adjudsatury proceedings; LBP-83-40,18 NRC 100 (1983)

(1983)

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), CLI-815,13 NRC Pacifs Gu and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB 592, il 361, 362 (1981)

NRC 744,745 (1980) right to evidentiary hearing on new contentil ns by virtue of request for low-power license; wetha given to unpublished decisions; LBP-83 77,18 NRC 1395 n.168 (1983)

LBP-83-57,18 NRC 632 (1483)

Pacifs Gu and Electre Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-592, Il standards for reopenmg evidenuary heannss; LBP-83-41,18 NRC 108 (1983)

NRC 744,746 (1980)

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canycn Nuctsar Power Plant, Umts I and 2), CLI-81-5,13 NRC basis for disclosure ofinformahon under a protecta e order; ALAB-735,18 NRC 25 (1983);

i 368, 362 4 3 (1981)

LBP-83-53,18 NRC 288 (1983) showing accessary for waiver of fmancial qualifications rule; LBP-83-49,18 NRC 240 (1983)

Pacific Gu and Electre Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-598,11 Pacarc Gas and Elcetric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), CLI-81-5,13 NRC NRC 876 (1980) 361, 362-64 (1981) use of new information as basis for reopeniris a record; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 477 (1983) criteria for reopening the record; LBP-83-50,18 NRC 246,247,251 (1983)

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-598, il Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), CLI 81-5,13 NRC NRC 876,879 (1980) 361, 363 (1988) burden to be satisped for acceptance of motion to reopen the record; ALAB-738,18 NRC 180, hugabihty of contenuon asserung need for measures beyond NUREG-0737 requirements; 186,197 (1983); ALAB-756,18 NRC 1344 (1983); LBP-83-50,18 NRC 247 (1983)

LBP-83-39,18 NRC 86 (1983)

I scope of material supportmg monon to reopen; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1324 (1983) 64 68

e s

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES CASES Pacifw Gas and Electrw Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Po.er Plant, Units I and 2), CLI-88 6,13 NRC

. Portland General Electric Co. ; Pebble Springs Nuclear Plant, Uneas I and 2), CLI-76-27,4 NRC 610 443 (1981).

(1976) improper use of 2.206 peutions, DD-83-il,18 NRC 295 (1983) concepts used to determine a petiuoner's standmg to intervene; ALAB-743,18 NRC 411 n.23 Pacific G s and Electric Co (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unas I and 21, CLI-82 39,16 (1933); LBP.83-45,18 NRC 215 (1983)

NRC 1712,1714-15 (1982)

Portland General Electric Co. (Pebbie Springs Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), CLI-76-27,4 NRC 610, entma for raising a new issue through a monon to reopen; ALAB-753,18 NRC 4325 n.3 (1983) 613 (1976) cnteria for reopenmg the record, LBP-83 50,18 NRC 246 (1983); LBP-83-58,18 NRC 663 applwauon ofjudicial standards to administrative proceedmss; ALAB-743,18 NRC 412 nn.25, 26 (1981)

(1983) test for reopening the record to consider design quahty assurance issues; ALAB-750,18 NRC Pcelland General Electric Co (Pebbte Sprin6s Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), CLI-76-27,4 NRC 610, 1210 n.10 (1983) 614 (1976)

P<cific G*s and Electric Co. (INblo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), LBP 88 21,14 concepts apphed in determining an intervention petitioner's interests; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 332 &

NRC 107, II),118 (1981) n.4 (1983) operanon of a nuclear power plant pending resolunon of genenc unresolved safety issues; Portland General Electric Co. (Pebble Springs Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), CL1-76-27,4 NRC 610, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 472 (1983) 614-17 (1976) e Pacific Gas and Electne Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation and Dev. Comm'n,000 U.S.

discretionary intervention where petitioner does not antisfy standing requsrements; ALAB-743,18 000,75 L. Ed_2d 752,767 (1983)

NRC 390 (1983); CLI-83-25,18 NRC 333 (1983)

NRC authority concernmg financial quahfications of hcensees, CLI-83-21,18 NRC 159 n.3 (1983)

Portland General Electric Co. (Trojan Nuclear Plant). ALAB-524,9 NRC 65 (1979); ALAB-531,9 Pennsylvtrua Power and Light Co. (Susquehanna Steam Elecinc Sution, Units I and 2), ALAB-641 NRC 263 (1979) 13 NRC 550 (1981) basis for judging late intervention petitioner's ability to contribute to a sound record; ALAB-747, l

s.otential for future litiganon as cause for directed cert ficanon; ALAB 737,18 NRC 176 n.12 18 NRC 1878 n.30 (1983)

(1983)

Portland General Electiic Co. (Trojan Nuclear Plant), ALAB-531,9 NRC 263,273 (1979)

Pennsylvania Power and Light Co. (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units I and 2), ALAB-641, circumstances appropriate for imposition of conditions or limitations on reactor operanon; 13 NRC 550,552 (1988)

ALAB-746,18 NRC 754 n.4 (1984) delay and eapense caused by Licensing Board erru. n cause for interlocutory review; ALAB-741, Portland General Electric Co. (Trojan Nuclear Pland, ALAB-531,9 NRC 263,273 (1979) 18 NRC 378 n.it (1983) incorporation of survedlance program for foundation mat into applicant's techmcal specifications; Pinn ylvtnia Power and Light Co. (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units I and 2), ALAB-693 ALAB-753,18 NRC 1328 (1983)

I6 NRC 952,955 (1982)

Portland General Electric Co. (Trojan Nuclear Pland ALAB-534,9 NRC 287 (1979) responsitahties of parues concernin6 appellate bnefs; ALAB-739,18 NRC 338 n> (1983) basis for judging late intervention peutioner's abehty to coninbute to a sound record; ALAB-747, Pennsylvania Power and Light Co. (Susquehanna Steam Electric Stauon, Umts I and 2), LBP-81-8.13 18 NRC 1878 n 30 (1983)

NRC 335 (1981)

Portland General Electric Co. (Trojan Nuclear Plant), ALAB-534,9 NRC 287,289 n.4 (1979) hght in which confictmg affidavits and record must be viewed when response to summary need to reevaluate cost-benefit balance for issuance of low-power heense; LBP 83-57,18 NRC disposition motion is receive.!; LitPO-4,18 NRC 223 (1983) 629 n.76 (1983)

Pennon for Emergency and Remedial Acuon, CLI-80-21, il NRC 707 (1980)

Licensms Board jurisdiction in license s

_,...M39,18 NRC 339 (1983) requirements and guidance for environmental quahfication of electric equipment important tu Licensing Board jurisdestion over matters not covered by notics of opportunity for hearing; nafety; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 536 (1983)

LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1269 n.3,1286 (1983)

Philadelphia Electnc Co. (Limenck Generating Stanon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-262,1 NRC 163 Potomac Alhance v. NRC,682 F.2d 1030,1036-37 (D C. Car.1982) 195-97 (1975) test of whether uncertain circumstances should be considered under NEPA; LBP-83-57,18 NRC curms defects in a Iinal Environmental Statement; LBP-83-36,18 NRC 47,48 (1983) 628-29 (1983)

Phdadelphia Electric Co. (Limerick Generatmg Stanon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-726,17 NRC 755 Potomac Electric Power Co. (Douglas Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units I and 2), ALAR-277, (1983) 1 NRC 53s,547,551 (1975) junsdicuon to rule on penuon for reconsideration following issuance of iniual decision; deferral of proceedings where construction has been suspended; LBP-83-66,18 NRC 799,800 LBP-83-58,18 NRC 644 (1983)

(1983)

Phdadelphia Electric Co. (Limenck Generatmg Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-726,17 NRC 755,759 l

Power Reactor Development Co. v. Internauonal Union,367 U.S. 3%,407 (I%I) i n.9 (1983) heahh and safety standard required for issuance of operating heense; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1345 junsdiction over exceptions fded from partial initial decisions; LBP 83-77,18 NRC 1395 nn.166, (1983) 167 (1983)

Power Reactor Development Corp. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, Phdadelphia Electric Co. (Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3), ALAB-216,8 AEC 367 U.S. 3% (IMI) 13, 20-21 (1974) effect of authonzation for fuelloading and pre-criticality testmg on further licensing purpose of basis with specificity requirement for contenuons, LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1268 (1983) authorizauons; CLI-83-27,18 NRC ll49 (1983) sausfaction of baus requirement for contenuons; LBP-83-75A,18 NRC 1263 (1983)

Phdhps v. 30m Legislative Committee on Performance and Expenditure prview of the State of Power Reactor Development Corp. v. Internanonal Union,367 U.S. 3%,407 (1961) degree of quahty espected in construction of nuclear power plants; ALAB-740,18 NRC 346 a I Mississippi,637 F.2d 1014,1020 (5th Cir.1981)

(1983) hmitauon on standard of conduct leadmg to disquahrication of a Licensing Board judge; Project Management Corp. (Chnch River Breeder Reactor Plant), ALAB-354,4 NRC 383 (1976) j ALAB-748,18 NRC 1191, Il93 (1983)i ALAB-749,18 NRC 1203 (1983) affirmation of a Licensing Board's denial of a late-filed petitin to intervene; ALAB 743,18 NRC 413 (1983) 62 63

a 1.EGAL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES CASES Pubhc Service Co. of Indiana (Marble 11:11 Nuclear Generatmg Stauon, Umts I and.M. ALA3-316,3 Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshire (Scabrook Stanon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-488,8 NRC 187 NRC 167 (1976)

(1978)

Licensms Board Junsdicuun over matters not covered by notre of opportunity for hearms; applwauon of sanctions, CLI-83-29,18 NRC 1861 (1983)

LBP-RJ 76,18 NRC 1269,1286 (1983)

Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Station, Units I and 2), ALAB-513,8 NRC 694,695 Pubhc Servwe Co. ofInduna (Marble lid! Nuclear Generstmg St.imn, Umts I and 2), ALAB-316,3 gg97g3 NRC 167,170-71 (1976)

Licensing Board jurisdiction to decide monon to reopen record where iniual decision has been Lwensms Board jurisdicuon in hcense amendment proceedms, ALAB-739,18 NRC 339 (1983) issued; LBP-83-58,18 NRC 643 (1983)

Pubic Service Co. of Indiana (Marble 11:11 Nuclear Generstmg Stanon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-339,4 Public Service Co. of New llampshire (Seabrook Station, Units I and 2), ALAB-513,8 NRC 694, NRC 20 (1976) 695-96 (1978) d0rmat on of Licensmg Board's grant of late-Gled peution to intervene; ALAD-743,18 NRC 414 Appeal Board jurisdicuon over issue addressed in proceeding that has become admimstrahvely (1983) final; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1330 (1983)

Pubhc Service Co of Indiana (Marble 11:11 Nuclear Generstms Stauon, Units I and 2), ALAB-405,5 resolunon of safety issues after the record has closed; ALAB-750A,18 NRC 1220 (1983)

NRC 1890,1892 (1977)

Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-731,17 NRC 1073 circumstances appropriate for directed ceruficauon of legal issues raised in pendmg Licenung (g983); ALAB 734,18 NRC ll (1983) thurd p,oceedmgs; ALAB-737,18 NRC 171 (1983) denial of motion for directed cerufication; ALAB-742,18 NRC 383 n.5 (1983) criteria for grant of directed ceruGcation; ALAB 734,18 NRC 14 (1983); ALAB 735,18 NRC Pubic Service Co. of New IInmpshire (Seabrook Stahon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-734,18 NRC 11,14 23,25 (1983); ALAB-741,18 NRC 375 (1983); ALAB-742,18 NRC 383 n 8 (1983) n.4 (1983)

Pubhc Service Co. ofInduna (Marble flill Nuclear Generstmg Station, Units I and 2), ALAB-461,7 content of oppositions to directed certification petiuons; ALAB-741,18 NRC 374 n.3 (1983)

NRC 313,318 (1978)

Pubhc Service Co. of New Ilampshire (Seabrook Stanon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 Ikiard authortly to resolve contested issues that are the object of ongoing confirmatory analysis at (ggg3) the close of the record, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 519 (1983) derual of motion for directed cert Gcation; ALAB-742,18 NRC 383 n.5 (1983)

Pubhc Servwe Co. of Indiana (Marble 1I:11 Nuclear Generating Stanon, Umts i and 2), ALAB-530,9 Pubhc Service Co. of New llampshire (Seabrook Stauon, Units I and 2), ALAB-737,18 NRC 168, NRC 261,262 (1979) 176 n.12 (1983)

Appeal Board junsdicuon over issue addressed in proceedmg that has become administrahvely delay and expense caused by Licensing Board error as cause for interkrutory review; ALAB-741, Gnal; AL AB 753,18 NRC 1330 (1983) 18 NRC 378 n.ll (1983) resolunon of safety issues after the record has closed; ALAB-750A,18 NRC 1220 (1983)

Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Stanon, Units I and 2), CLI 77-8,5 NRC 503 (1977)

Pubix Servwe Co. of Indiana (Marble 11:11 Nuclear Generatmg Station (Imts I and 2), CLI-80-10,11 right ofintervenors to hearms on license extension requesa; CLI-83-27,18 NRC 1149 (1983)

NRC 438,441 (1980)

Pubhc Service Co. of New llampshire (Seabrook Station, Umts I and 2), CLI-781,7 NRC I,14 Commi.sion pohcy regardmg formal hearms on enforcement actions; CLl-83 27,18 NRC 1148 (g97g)

(1983) duty of State regulatory bodies to establish rates covering costs engendered by nuclear fac li,j Pubhc Servke Co. of New Itampshire (Seabrook Station, Umts I and 2), AL AB-271,1 NRC 478,483 Iwenses; LBP-83-37,18 NRC 58 (1983)

(1975)

Pubhc Service Co. of New Itampshire (Seabrook Stanon, Units I and 2), CLI-78 I,7 NRC 1,18 89 circumstances appropriate for directed ceruGcahon of legal issues raised in pendmg Licensms l

gg97g3 Board proceedmss, ALAB 737,18 NRC 171 (1983) adequacy of petitioner's assumption that hcensee would dehberately fail to report Pubhc Scruce Co. of New llampshire (Seabrook Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-271, i NRC 478, nonconformances as basis for a contention; DD-83-19,18 NRC 1468 (1983) 483-86 (1975)

Pubhc Service Co. of New llampshire (Scabrook Station, Umts I and 2), CL178 l,7 NRC 19 (1978) circumstances appropnate for discreuonary interlocutory appellate review; ALAB-742,18 NRC NRC means for assuring that unhues needmg funds will not skimp on regulatory comphance; 383 n.7 (1983)

LBP-83-37,18 NRC 59 (1983)

Publ c Servwe Co. of New llampshire (Seabrook Station, Units I and 2), ALAB-271,1 NRC 478,485 Public Service Co. of New llampshire (Scabrock Station, Units I and 2), LBP-74-36,7 AEC f77,879 i

t1975)

(1974)

Lwensmg Board junwinuon concerning transportatson of spent fuel between facihues; hght in which confhetmg affidavits and record must be viewed when response to ummary ALAB-741,18 NRC 377 n.8 (1983) disposition monon is received; LBP-83-46,18 NRC 223 (1983)

Pubhc Seruce Co. of New ilampshire (Seabrooi Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-422,6 NRC 33,41 Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Station, Umts I and 2), LBP-83-32A,17 NRC 1170, t1977), ard, CLI-78-1,7 NRC I (1978), afd sub nom. New England Coahuon on Nuclear I177 n.5 (1983)

Pollunon v. NRC,582 F.2d 87 (1st Cir.1978) weight given to NOREG-0654 evaluanon criteria in interpreting requirements for offsite responsibihties of Boards to address intervenors' arguments; ALAB 740,18 NRC 366-67 nn.102, emergency equipment; LBP-83-68,18 NRC 944 n.71 (1983) 104 (1983)

Pubhc Service Co. of Oklahoma (Black Fox Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-397,5 NRC 1143, li 48 Pubhc Servwe Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Stahon, Units I and 2), ALAB-422,6 NRC 33,64 l

(1977), reconsiderahon denied, ALAB-402,5 NRC 1882 (1977) n.34 (1977) cause for grant of discretionary intervention; ALAB-743,18 NRC 405 n.4 (1983) stand.irds for reopenms evidentiary hearmgs; LBP-83-41,18 NRC 108 (1983)

Pubhc Service Co. of Oklahoma (Black Fox Stanon Units I and 2), ALAB-573,10 NRC 775,804 Pubhc Servwe Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Stauon, Umts I and 2), AL AB-422,6 NRC 33, gg979) 77-72 (1977) standards for reopening evidentiary hearings; LBP-83-41,18 NRC 108 (1983) duiy of State regulatory bodies to estabhsh rates coverms costs engendered by nudcar facahty Public Service Co. of Oklahoma (Black Fox Station, Units I and 2), ALAB-723,17 NRC 555 (1983) licenses; LBP-83-37,18 NRC 58 (1983) vacation of decisaon that is the basis of case over which jurisdiction has been terminated; ALAB-745,18 NRC 747 (1983)

'4 65

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES CASES Pubhc Service Electnc and Gas Co. (flope Creek Generaung Station. Umts I and 2), LBP-78-15,7 SEC v. Dresser Industnes, Inc.,628 F.2d 1368,1375,1377,1380 (D C. Cir.1980) (en barw), cert.

NRC 642,674 fT (1978), affd, ALAB 518,9 NRC 14 (1979) demed,449 U.S. 993 (1980) scope of sesumony on risks of operstmg Indian Point Station; LBP 83-68, is NRC 838 (1983) legahey of NRC invesugauon parallehng Jusuce Department invesugaten; ALAB-738,18 NRC Pubhc Service Elcaric and Gas Co (Salem Nuclear Generatmg Statmn, Umt I), ALAB450,14 NRC 188 n.14,191 (1983) 43, 49 50,alTJ sub nom. Township of Lower Alloways Creek v. Pubhc Service Electric and Gas SEC v. Dresser Industnes, Inc.,628 F.2d 1368,1375-80,1383-87 (D C. Cir.1980) (en banc), cert.

Co.,687 F 2d 732 (3d Cir.1982) denied,101 S. CL $29 (1980) content of appcitate bnefs; ALAB-739,18 NRC 338 n 4 (1983); ALAB 740,18 NRC 348 n.7 NRC authority to investigate matters following their referral to the Justre Department; (1983)

CLI-83-24,18 NRC 220-23 (1983)

Pubhc Servwe Eleonc and Gas Co (Salem Nuclear Generaung Station, Uma l), LBP-80-27,12 NRC Sierra Club v. Morton,405 U.S. 727 (1972) 435, 451 (1980),afrd, ALAB450,14 NRC 43 (1981),atTd, Township of Lower Alloways Creek v.

interests whwh do not confer standmg for purposes ofintervennon; CLI-83 25,18 NRC 332 Pubhc Scruce Electric and Gas Co., t>87 F.2d 732 Od Cir.1982)

(1983) rewlution of issues raised sua spi.nte by a Licensms Board, LBP-83 58,18 NRC 647 (1983)

Smith v. Danyo,585 F.2d 83 04 Car.1978)

Puerto Rico Elecinc Power Authority (North Coast Nuclear Plans, Umt I), ALAB 648,14 NRC 34, factors considered in evaluaung timchness of a monon for disquahGcahon; ALAB-757,18 NRC 36 (1981) 1361 n.22 (1983)

Puerto Rico Water Resources Authonty (North Coast Nuclear Plant, Umt I), ALAB-313,3 NRC 94, South Carol.na Electnc and Gas Co. (Vugil C. Summer Nuclear Stanon, Uma 1), ALAB-642,13 NRC

% (1976) 881 (1981) baws for decidmg appeal, ALAB 747,18 NRC 1877 n.29 (1983) reversal of Licensms Board's grant oflate-filed petition to intervene; ALAB-743,18 NRC 414 commurncanons that are en parte; ALAB-749,18 NRC 1203 (1983)

(1983)

Puget Sound Power and Light Co. (Skagit Nuclear Power Prosect, Umts I and 2), ALAB-556,10 weight given to avadabihty of other means to protect a petitioner's interests; LBP-83-42,18 NRC NRC 30,32 n 6 (1979)

I18 (1983) effect of delay m films recusal motions; ALAB-749,18 NRC 1198 n.7 (1983)

South Carohna Electric and Gas Co. (Virgd C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit I), ALAB442,13 NRC Puget Sound Power and Light Co (Skagit Nuslear Power Project, Umts I and 2), ALAB-556,10 881,892-93 (1981), afCd sub nom. FauGeld United Act on v. NRC,679 F.2d 268 (D C. Cir.1982)

NRC 30,32-33 (1979) importarme of crosw ammanon in developing a complete record, ALAB-747,18 NRC Il82 basis for disquahGcanon motion; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1187 (1983)

(1983) standmg of a party to move for dmiuahficanon of a Judge; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1892 (1983);

South Carolma Electnc and Gas Co. (Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Stanon, Unit I), ALAB442,13 NRC ALAB-749,18 NRC 1202 (1983) 881, 894 (1981),alTd sub nom. FairGelJ United Acuon v. NRC,679 F.2d 261 (D C. Cir.1982)

Puget Sound Power and Light Co (Skagii Nuclear Power Proiect, Umts I and D, ALAB-559,10 late mtervennon pennoner's responsibihty to define scope of its contribunon to a sound record; NRC 162 (1979), sacaled as moot. CLI 80-34,12 NRC 407 (1980)

AL AB-743,18 NRC 399-400 (1983); ALAB 747,18 NRC 1877 (1983) etTirmation of a Licensmg Board's denial of a late-filed peuhon to intervenei ALAB-743,18 Sou:h Carolina Electnc and Gas Co (Virgd C. Summer Nuclear Station, Uma 1), ALAB442 Il NRC NRC 413 (1983) 881, 895 (1981),affd sub nom. Fairfield United Acuan v. NRC,679 F.2d 261 (D C. Cir.1982)

Puget Sound Power anJ Light Co. (Skagit Nuclear Power Project, Units I and 2), ALAB 559,10 need for NRC StalT review of operating license apphcanon; ALAB-747,18 NRC 18 73 n.19 (1983)

NRC 162,170 (1979)

South Carohna Electric and Gas Co. (Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Stanon, Uma 1), ALAB463,14 NRC merns for protectmg interests of intervenor proffenns contentions after close of record; 1140, 1163 (1981)

LBP-83-58.18 NRC 660 (1983)

Board pursuit of defaulted issues. LBP-8349,18 NRC 1086 n.5 (1983)

Puget Sound Power and Light Co. (Skagit Nuclear Power Project, Units I and 2), CLI-80-34,12 NRC South Carolina Electric and Gas Co. (Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Stanon, Umt I) LBP-784, 7 NRC 407 (1980) 209, 213 (1978) ground for termmanon of appellate proceedmg when project has been terminated; ALAB-755,18 abihty of NRC Staff to represent late intervenuon petitioner's interests; ALAB-747,18 NRC NRC 1339 (1983) 1174 (1983)

Richards of Rockford, Inc. v. PaciGc Gas and Electnc Co.,71 F R D. 388 (N.D. Cal.1976)

South Carolma Electnc and Gas Co. (Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Uma 1), LBP-82 55,16 NRC b&ncmg called for by First Amendment or common law pnvilege in determmms whether to 225 (1982) release mformanon under protecuve order; LBP-83-53,18 NRC 288 n 3 (1983) elTectiveness of partial iniual decisions; LBP-83-77, la NRC 1395 n.165 (1983)

South Carohna Electnc and Gas Co. (V rgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Uma 1), LBP-82 55,16 NRC Rotxnson v. Umted States,144 F 2d 392 (5th Cir.1944), affd,324 U.S. 282 (1945) i niture of communications between attorney and potennal chent, LBP-83 70,18 NRC 1098 (1983) 225, 268-80 (1982))

Rochester Gas and Electnc Corp. (Sterhng Power Project, Nuclear Unit No I),

',AB-5%,11 NRC scope ofissues appropriately raised in proceedmg renouced after 10 years; LBP-83-73,18 NRC 867 (1980) 1235 n.1 (1983) ground for termmation of appellate proceedmg when project has been terminated ALAB-755,18 Southern Cahfornia Edison Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generating Stanon Umts I and 2), ALAB-673, NRC 1339 (1983)

IS NatC 688,695-96 (1982)

Sacrrmento Mumcipal Unhty Distnct (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generaung Station), ALAB-655,14 catabbshment of privity between an applicant and one ofits major contractors; LBP-83-34,18 NRC 799,803 (1981)

NRC 38 n.3 (1983) scope of sua spimic appellate review; ALAB 739,18 NRC 341 (1983)

Southern Califorma Edison Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generstmg Stanon, Umts 2 and 3), ALAB-717, SCM Corp. v. Xeron Corp.,77 F.R D 10 (D. Conn.1977) 17 NRC 346,35748 (1983) impossuon of time hmits on cross-exammauon, LBP-8348,18 NRC 841 n 7 (1983) reason that ACRS reports may not be rehed upon in support of health and safety findmgs, LBP-83 57,18 NRC 518 (1983) 66 i

67 l

1 b

a a

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CA~ES CASES Ten Apphcations for Low Enriched Uranium Exports to EUR ATOM Member Nations, CLI 77-24,6 Southera Cahforrua Edison Co (San Onofre Nuclear Generstmg Station, Units 2 and 3), ALAB-717, NRC 525,529 (1977) 17 NRC 346,371-72 (1983) precedent concerning views ofintervenors in NRC proceedmgs, ALAB-743,18 NRC 411 n 24 consequence ofintervenor's failure to file proposed findmgs, LBP-83-43,18 NRC 130 (1983)

(1983)

Southera Cahforma Edison Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generstmg Station, Units 2 and 3), CLI-83-lo, Tennessee Valley Authority (Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-341,4 NRC 95 17 NRC 528,535 37 (1983)

(1976) guidelines for medical services for contaminated mjured individuals; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 80 aftirmation of a Licensing Board's denial of a late-filed petition to intervene; ALAB 743,18 (1983); LBP 83-68,18 NRC 949 (1983)

NRC 413 (1983)

Southern Cahfornia Edison Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generstmg Station, Umts 2 and 3), LBP-82 3, Tennessee Valle, Authority (Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units I,2 and 3), ALAB477,15 NRC 15 NRC 61 (1982) 3337, 1338 (1982) cffectiveness of partial initial decisions; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1395 n.165 (1983) responsibility of parties to inform Appeal Board of significant developments bearing on decisions Southern Cahforma Edison Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generatmg Stanon, Units 2 and 3), LBP-82-37, in the proceedms; ALAB-752,18 NRC 1320 (1983) 15 NRC 1163,1877-82 (1982)

Tennessee Valley Authority (Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units I,2 and 3), ALAB477,15 NRC bazs for local variations in EPZ radius; LBP-83 52A,18 NRC 277 (198D 1387, 1394 (1982)

Southers California Edison Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generstmg Station, Units 2 and 3), LBP-42-39, obligation of parties in appellate proceedings to submit relevant new material; ALAB-750,18 15 NRC 1163.1186 (1982), alt'd, ALAB-717,17 NRC 346 (1983)

NRC 1210 n.li (1983) polwy concerning distribution of potassum iodide for pubhc use durms radiological emergencies; Staff responsibihty to brms new information to the attention of the Board, ALAB 738,18 NRC LBP-83 71,18 NRC 1109 n.13 (IW3) 197 (1983)

Southern Methodist Univ. Ass'n v. Wynne & Ja:Te,599 F.2d 707,711-12 (5th Cir 1979)

Tennessee Valley Authority (Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Uruts I,2 and 3), CLI-82-26,16 NRC 880, applicatxhty of collateral order doctrme to Board order for NRC Staff to disclose information on 881 (1982) confidentialinvestigation, ALAB-735,18 NRC 26 (19837 vacation of decisions forming bass for issue which has become moot; CLI-83 30,18 NRC 1165 Starks v. Chrysler Corp. (In re Apphcation of Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.),32 Fed.

(1983)

R. Serv. 2d 1373 (S D N.Y.1981)

Tennessee Valley Authority (Itartsville Nuclear Plants, Units I A,2A, IB and 2B), ALAB-467,7 factors balanced in determming apphcation of attorney's privilege; LBP-8344,18 NRC 769 n.3 NRC 459,463 (1978)

(1983) circumstances appropriate for issuance of advisory opinions; ALAB 743,18 NRC 390 n.4 (1983)

Stiement of Policy on Conduct of Licensing Proceedings, CLI-81-8,13 NRC 452 (1981)

Tennessee Valley Authority (Watts Bar Nuclear I; tant, Units I and 2), ALAB-413,5 NRC 1418,1422 Board responsibehty to satisfy itself that late-filed motions for reconsideration are supported by (1977) good cause; LBP-83 58,18 NRC 644 (1983) weight given to late intervention petitioner's abihty to coc. tribute to a sound record; ALAB-747, discretion of Licensing Board Chairman in management of proceedings; ALAB-748,18 NRC 18 NRC 1880 (1983) 1886,1193 (1983); ALAB-749,18 NRC 1197-98 (1983)

Texas Utilities Generating Co. (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units I and 2), CLI-8136,14 showmg necessary for denial of summary disposition; LBP-83-46,18 NRC 223 (1983)

NRC lill (1981)

Statement of Pohey on Conduct of Licensing Proceedmss, CLI-81-8,13 NRC 452,454 (1981) authority of Licensms Boards to declare sua sponte issues; LBP-8349,18 NRC 1085 n.3 (1983) factors balanced in applying sanctions; CLI-83-29,18 NRC 1161 (1983)

Toledo Edison Co. (Davis-Bes e Nuclear Power Station), ALAB-300,2 NRC 752,758 (1975) pohey on sanctions against parties for taking a legal position a Board thmks is wrong; LBP-83-56, appealabihty of order terminating intervenor's right to participate in proceeding; LBP-83-58,18 IS NRC 433 (1983)

NRC 665 (1983)

Sttement of Policy on Conduct of Licensing Proceedmss, Cl.l-818, ;3 NRC 452,455 (1981)

Licensing Board actions which are appealable; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1394 n.164 (1983) consolidation of contentions and intervenors; LBP-83-52A,18 NRC 273 (1983) types of appeals that are interlocutory, and their disposition, ALAB-736,18 NRC 166 (1983)

Sttiment of Pohey on Conduct of Licensing Proceedings, CLI-81-8,13 NRC 452,456 (1981)

Toledo Edison Co. (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3), ALAB422,12 NRC 667 suthority of Boards to hmit discovery; LBP 83-79,18 NRC 1401 n.1 (1983)

(1980) and ALAB452,14 NRC 627 (1981)

Stat; ment of Pohey on Conduct of Licensms Proceedmgs, CLI-818,13 NRC 452,456 (1981) authority to revoke limited work authorization when facility has been cancelled; ALAB-755,18 NRC policy concerning directed certification; ALAB-741,18 NRC 374 (1983); ALAB-742,18 NRC 1339 n.4 (1983)

NRC 384 n.10 (1983)

Transnuclear Inc., CLI-77-24,6 NRC 525,531 (1977)

Stiement of Pohcy: Further Commission Guidance for Power Reactor Operating Licenses, iruury to a party, which is sufficient to confer standing; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 333 (1983)

CLIC)-42,12 NRC 654 (1980)

Trustees of Columbia University, ALAB-3,4 AEC 349 (1970) admission of contention questioning adequacy of schedule for implementmg moddication of need for UCLA research reactor to protect against sabotage; LBP-83-67,18 NRC 807,809 (1983) automatic depressurization system logic; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 85 (1983)

Union Electric Co. (Callaway Plant, Unit I), ALAB-740,18 NRC 341,346 (1983)

Stokrs v. Urated States,652 F.2d I (7th Cir.198D standard for new evidence for purpose of reopening a record; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1345 (1983) renlution of factual issues on basis of representations of counsel; ALAB-735,18 NRC 25 (1983)

Union Electric Co. (Callaway Plant, Unit I), ALAB-750,18 NRC 1205,1207 (1983)

Surface Mming Regulation Litigation,452 F. Supp. 327,335-36 (D D C,1978) need for design inspection program report for Comanche Peak; LBP-83-81,18 NRC I454 n.174 concurrence of one agency with another agency's actions as rulemaking; CLI-83-26,18 NRC (1983) 1844 n.2 (1983)

Union Electric Co. (Callaway Plant, Unit I), LBP-82409,16 NRC 1826 (1982)

Tilephone Workers Union of New Jersey, Local 827 v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.,584 F.2d 31 effectiveness of partial initial decisions; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1395 n.165 (1983)

(1974)

Us.,e -f Concerned Scientists v. AEC,499 F.2d 1069,1083-84 & n.35 (D.C. Cir.1974) privity between an apphcant and one of its major contractors; LBP-83-33,18 NRC 38 (1983) need for supplemental environmental impact statement prior to issuance of low-power hcense; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 627 29 (1983) 69 eg

- - -, - - ~ -.

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INZ EX CASES CASES Un%n of Concerned Scientists v. NRC,711 F.2d 370 (D C. Cir.198D United States v. Umsed Shoe Machinery Corp.,89 F. Supp. 357,358-59 (D. Mass.1950) reed for reconsiderahon of issues of environmental quahGcation of ssfety-related equipment; showing necessary to claim attorney-chent privdege; LBP.83-70,18 NRC 1098-99 (1981)

AL AB-744,18 NRC 744 (1983)

Umted States v. Umted Shoe Mactunery Corp.,89 F. Supp. 357,359 (D. Mass.1950)

Umon of Concerned Scienusts v. NRC,7il F.2d 370,376,377 (D C. Cir.1983) applicanon of attorney <hent privilese to nonlegal commumcanons walun primarily legal impact of court findmg of invahd poruons of final environmental quahGcation rule; LBP-83-57, meeting; LSP-83-70,18 NRC 1103 (1983) 18 NRC $37 (1983)

United States v. WIYN Radio Inc.,614 F.2d 495,497 (5th Cir.1980)

Uruted Airhnes, Inc. v. Lwans,43I U.S 553,558 U977) interpretation of " continuous violation"; CLI-83-20,18 NRC 6 (1983) interpretauon of "commuous violanon"; CLI.83 20,18 NRC 7 (1983)

Uppha Co. v. Umted States,449 U.S. 383 (1981)

Umted Stries, 565 F 2d 19,21 Od Cir.1977), cert. demed sub norn Bell v. Sociahst Workers Party, apphcanon of attorney-chent privilege to communications between employees and corporate 436 US %2 0978) counsel; CLI-83-31,18 NRC 1304-05 0983) rephcabihty of collateral order doctrine to Board order for NRC Sta4 no disclose information on Vega v. Bloomsburgh,427 F. Supp. 593 (D. Mass.1977) g confidentut invesugation AL AB-735,18 NRC 26 0983) right of counsel to approach witnesses of an opposms party; CLI- -,

Uruted Ste.tes v. Arnoff,466 F. Supp. 855 (S.D N.Y.1979)

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Stanon), ALAB 12,

di#erentiaten between facts and commumcanons for purpose of determimns attorney-chent 352 361-62 0 973) prov lege; LBP-83-70,18 NRC 1802 n.3 0983) cause for allowmg parties to supplement fihnss with new evidence; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1343 n 5 Umted Staes v. Capuol Service, Inc.,89 F.R.D. 578,582 (E.D. was.1981)

(1983) p-oper invocation of claim of esecuuve privilege; LBP-83-72,18 NRC 1223,1226 0983)

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), ALAB 124,6 AEC Unned St.rtes v. Cariello 536 F. Supp. 698 (D. N 3.1982) 358, 365 (1973) r.pphcanon of attorney-client privilege to commumcanon in pre =ence of third party; LBP-83-70, evaluating potenhal of late-filed contenuons for delaymg the proceedmg; LBP-83-58,18 NRC 18 NRC I100 n 1 (1923) 662 (1983)

United States v. Costanio,625 F 2J 465 Od Cir.1980) interpretauon of"signiGcant issue"; LBP-83-50,18 NRC 247 0983) nature of commumcanons between attorney and potential chent; LBP-83-70,18 NRC 1098 0953)

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yank e Nuclear Power Station), ALAB-138,6 A Umted States v. Cuthbertwn ( Appeal of CBS),6.10 F.2d 139 0980) 520, 523 0 973) fators balanted m determmmg apphcation of attorney's privilege; LBP-83-64,18 NRC 769 n.3 burden on proponents of a motion to reopen; ALAB 756,18 NRC i 4 I 83 p

g (1983) criteria that a mohon to reopen must satisfy; A Umted Staes v. Davis,533 F.2d 921,928 (5th Cir.1976)

NRC 108,109 0983) mzierut false statements as continuous violations; CLI-83-20,18 NRC 7,8 (1983)

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Stauon), ALAB-138,6 AEC Umted Stries v. Grmnell Corp.,384 US 563,583 (1966) 520,523 n.12 0973) wurce of bias or presud;ce that is disquahfying; ALAB-748,18 NRC 18910983); ALAB-749,18 catent of burden for reopening the record of a proceedmg not yet closed; LBP-83-50,18 NRC Umted 5 tes v K

, 97 U.S I,11-12 0970) uclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Stanon), ALAB 138,6 AEC Vermen Ya ec right of NRC to brief Jusuce Department on mforn;auon in its possessio1; CLI-83-24,18 NRC 520,523-24 U973) 320 n 8,323 0983) sr,aterial taken into account by Licensing Snard in ruling on monon to reopen the record-Lmied Sutes v. LaSalle National Bank,437 U.S. 298,316 (1978)

LBP-83-50,18 NRC 247,249 0983)

NRC anathartty to conduct investigauon while Grand Jury investiganon is under way; CL1-83-24, standard for new evidence for purpose of reopening a record; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1343, g 18 NRC 319,322 0983) 0983)

Umted States v. Leggett & Pl.tt, Inc.,542 E2d 655,658-59 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied,430 U.S.

Verment Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), ALAB-138,6 AEC di overy of privileged commumcations; LBP-83 72,18 NRC I225 U983) c'g deficiencies on authorizauon of a hcense; LBP-83 77,18 NRC 1368 n 6 0983) en i Umted Sutes v. McGovern,87 ER D. 582 (1980); 87 ER D. 584, $88 0980); 87 F.R.D. 590,598, rela *ionship between seriousness of a violahon and the consequences of that violauon, 593 U?80)

LBP.83-81 18 NRC 1452 n.172 0983)

NRC authorny to conduct mvesuganon while Grand Jury investigauon is under way; CLI-83 24 Vermont Yankee uclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), ALAB 179,7 AEC 18 NRC 322 n.110983) 159,174 n.17 0974)

Umted Sutes v. M(Partim 595 F.2d 1321,1336-37 (7th Cir ), cert. demed,444 U S 833 0979);

flexibehty in determining acceptable way to comply with regulanons; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 507 Umted Sutes v. Melvin,650 E2d 641 (5th Cir.1981) 0983) rppinanon of attorney chent prmlege to commumcanon in presence of third party; LBP-33-70, Virgmia Electric and Power Co. (North Anna Nuclear Power Stanon, Units I and 2), ALAB-289,2 18 NRC 1100 & n 10983)

NRC 395 0975)

United States v. Nnon,4I8 US 683,705 0974) affirmation of a Licensing Boaru's denial of a late-filed petiuon to intervene; ALAB.743, gg reason for protectmg confidennahty of communications between high government officulE NRC 414 0983)

Unned Staes v. Ostrer,422 E Supp 93 (S D N.Y.1976)

Viramia Electric and Power Co. (North Anna Nuclear Power Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB 289,2 LBP-83 72,18 NRC 1226 0983)

NRC 395,398 0975) nature of commumcations between attorney and potennal chent; LBP-8300,18 NRC 1098 0983) weight given to a petiuoner's failure to establish good cause for late intervemion; Atag.743, gg Unned States v. Patrak,542 E2d 381,390 (7th Car.1976)

NRC 413 n.30 (1983) imporunce of umely fihng of disquahfication motions; ALAB-757,18 NRC I360 n.20 0983) 70 71

LEGAL C11 ATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX i

CASES CASES 1

j Vwsima Electnc and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Stauca, Units I and 2), ALAB-289,2 Warm Spnns Tant I orce v. Unbble,62I F 2d 1017,1023-36 (9th Cir. 8981)

NRC 395,400 (1975) factors determimns need to supplement Final Environmental Staternent; LBP-83-36,18 NRC 49 l

smportance of potennal for delay of proceedmg in balancmg of factors for late interventson; (g9g3)

ALAB-743,18 NRC 40243 (1983)

Warth v. SelJm,422 U.S. 490,499 (1975)

Varsmaa Electru and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Staten, Units I and 2), ALAB-342,4 iryury to a party, which is sulTicient to cor.fer standing; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 333 (1983)

NRC 98 (1976)

Warth v. Sendm,422 U.S. 490,500 (19754 affirmanon of Latenung Board's grant oflate-filed petstaan to intervene; ALAB-743 IS NRC 414 ranonale for standmg test apphed by courts; ALAB-743,18 NRC 412 a 27 (1983)

(1983)

Washington Pubhc Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Propect No. 2), ALAB-571, IO NRC 687 Vi gama Electrw and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Stauon, Unnas I and 2), ALAB-363,4 692 (1979)

NRC 631 (8976) scom of sua sponse appellate review; ALAB-739. IS NRC 341 (1983) nght of lane intervenuon petstioner to discrebonary intervention; ALAS-743,18 NRC 390 (1983)

Washmston Pubhc Power Supply Sysics (WPPSS Nuclear Prosect No. 3), ALAB-747,18 NRC 3 867 Varsmaa Electric and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Stanon, Units I and 2), ALAB-491,8 (1983)

NRC 245,244 (1978) fadure of late-filed contention on hot funcuonal testing to meet enteria of; LBP-83 75 A,18 NRC findmg necessary for assuance of an operaung teense for a nuclear power plant; LBP-83-57. I8 1261 (1983)

NRC 464 (1983)

Washing %n Public s'ower Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Project Na 3) ALAB-747,18 NRC 1867, j

operation of a nuclear power plant pendmg resolution of generic unresolved safety issues; p73-77 (1983) l LBP-83-57 IS NRC 472 (1983) abihty of NRC Staff to adequately represent an intervenor's interests; LBP-83-80,18 NRC I407 Vwsmaa Elecenc and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-551,9 nli(1983)

NBC 704 (1979)

Wadunston Puble Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Project Nos. I ar d 2), CLI 82 29,16 NRC Appeal Board jurisdicsson to rule on motion to reopen where review of decision encompassing 3221, 1228 29 (1982) issue so be reopenc,d is not coraplete; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1330 ni4 (1983) protection of a party's interests by 2.206 petition rather than through late intervention; Vwsmes Electric and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Stauon, Units I and 2), ALAB-551,9 ALAB-747,181874,1876 (1983)

NRC 704,70f, (1979)

Wastungton Pubhc Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Prosect Not 3 and 5), ALAB-501,8 NRC Lzensang Board jurisd cten to decide motaan to reopen record where initial decisaon has been 331 f1978) issaed, LBP-83-58,18 NRC 643 (1983) appellate jurisdicuon over request for reconsaderanon of environmental quahricanon issue; Vrsmia Electrw and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Stanon Unats I and 2), ALAB-558,9 ALAB-744,18 NRC 744 (1983)

NTC 704,707 (1979)

Wisconsin Electric Power Ca (Point Beach NucIcar Plant, Unit 2), ALAB-86,5 AEC 376 (1972) appellate junsdiction over request for reconsideration of environmental quahfication issue; content of monons to reopen the record; LDP-83-55,18 NRC 417 n 4 (1983)

ALAB-744,18 NRC 744 (1983) cntena for reopening the record where record of entire proceedin8 has not been closed; resoluten of safety issues after the record has closed ALAB-750A,18 NRC 3220 (1983)

LBP-83-50,18 NRC 248 (1983); LBP-83-52,18 NRC 257 n.2 (1983)

Vi~gsnia Electre and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Stanon Units I and 2), ALAS 476,15 factors considered in evaluaims timehness of a motion to reopen the record, LBP-83-50,18 NRC NEC til7,1818 n2,1119-20,3I30 (1982) 249 n.4 (1983) dermitaan of a missic; LBP-83-46,18 NRC 219 al (1983)

Wisconsin Electric Power Co (Pom Beach Nuclear Plant, Uma l), ALAB-4%,16 NRC 1245,1256 V*situa Eiccars and Power Co (North Anna Nuclear Power Stanon, Units I and 2), ALAB-748,18 (1982)

NIC 378 (1983)

Licensing Board achons which are appealable; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1394 n.164 (1983) demal of molen for directed certsfacatson; ALAB-742, la NRC 383 a5 (1983)

Wisconsm Puble Service Corp. (Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant), LBP-78-24,8 NRC 78,84 (1978)

Virgmes Electnc and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Staten, Umts I and 2), CLI-76-22,4 abihty of NRC StafT to represent late intervention pelinoner's interests; ALAB-747,18 NRC ICC 480 (1976) 1874 (1983) onussens as matenal false statements; CLI-83-20,18 NRC 3 (1983)

Wnght v. 3eep Corp.,547 F. Supp. 871 (E.D. Mich.1982)

Varsmaa Electru and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Staten, Unsts I and 2), CLI-76-22,4 balancing called for by Fast Amendment or common law pnvilege a,n determanmg whether to NRC 480,486,489-91 (1976), afrd,571 F.2d 1289 (4th Car.1978) release informaten under protective order; LBP-83-53,18 NRC 288 n.3 (1983) mearung of the term "matenal false statement"; UD-83-17,18 NRC 1293 (1983)

Zenith Radao Corp. v. Radio Corp. of Amenca,121 F. Supp. 792 (D. Del.1954)

Vwgmsa Electnc and Power Ca (North Anna Nuclear Power Station, Unsts I and 2), CLI-76-22,4 applicatuhty of assorney-chent privilege to attorney advice in a nonnegal capacity; LBP-83 70,18 N;C 480,488-93 (1976)

NRC 1103 (1983) untemely provison of sismfacant informanon by hcensee as a matenal false statement; ALAB-738,18 NP.C 198 (1983)

Vtgima Electrw and Power Co v. NRC,571 F.2d 1289 (4th Car.1978) 6 sterpretauon of matenal false statement; CLI-83-20,18 NRC 8 n.) (1983)

Vrgmaa Petroleum jobbers Ass *n v. Federal Power Comnussion,259 F.2d 921 (D C. Cir.1958) naht of intervenors to hearms on hcense catension request, CLI-83-27,18 NRC 1849 (1983)

Vwginia Petroleum jobbers Associanon v. Federal Power Commission,259 F.2d 921,925 (D.C. Cir..

1;58) critena for determuung whether to grant stay pendmg appeal; LBP-83-40,18 NRC 96 (1983)

I l

72

e e

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGIJLATIONS 10 C F R. 2 contenuon requirements for off-the-record proceedang; LBP4348,18 NRC 835 a 4 (19830 status of FLM A in NRC lecenang proceedmss, LSP-8341,18 NRC 702 (1983) 10 C F.R 2 4(p) status of FEM A employees as NRC personnel; LBP-8348,18 NRC 703,704 (1983) 10 C F R. 2.208 correction of defaciencies asserted in Nouce of Veolauon; DD-83-13, la NRC 722 (1983) 10 C F R 2.206 afttrmanon of densal of peutaan for show cause order, shegmg poor financial con &uon of hcensee; CLl-83-21,18 NRC 158 (1983)

Commisson referral of peuuon so suspend construcuan for consderaten under; LBP-83-58,16 NRC 642 (1983) denaal of peunon for stay of transport of irradiated nuclear fuel, DD-83-14.18 NRC 728 (1983) demal of petstion requesung issuance of show cause order relauve to suspenson, modifscanon, or revocanon of operaung hcense for deterioration an operator performance; DD-83-13,18 NRC 721 (1983) denial of pctenon requestm8 that hcensees produce design documents; DD-83-II,18 NRC 294 (1983) demal of pehuon to posspone all shipments of high-level waste through and to Ilhnoas; DD-83-12, 18 NRC 713 (19833 denaal of request so have NRC prohabet load test of polar crane at TMI 2; DD-83-18,18 NRC 1296-I301 (1983) forum for conalerauon of construchen-related matters at operaung heense stage; LBP-33-37,18 NRC 55 (198J) imposuon of Notice of Vantation for material false statement by apphcant; DD-8317,18 NRC 1289-95 (1983) sssues that are appropriately raased ueder. ALAB-750,18 NRC 1217 n.39 (1983) means for prosecung anterests of intervenor profferms contenuons after close of record, LBP-83-58, 18 NRC 660,663 (1983) pehuon requesun8 action to ensure correction of ernergency plannans deficsencaes granted in part, derucJ sa part, and deferred in part; DD-83-15,18 NRC 739 (1983) propriciy of request for show cause proceedmg concernang production of documents, DD-83 II,18 NRC 295 (1983) referral of Diablo Canyon construcuan quahty assurance concerns to Staff for consderauon as enfecement acten, CL1-83-27,18 NRC 185I (1983) relation of late intervenuon peuuons so peutnons under; ALAB 747,18 NRC Il74 (1983) a 10 C F R. 2 206(d calent of review of denial of 2 206 peuhon, ALAB-747,18 NRC 1876 (1983) 10 C.F R. 2 704tc) documents a.:companyang motmas for disquahficauon, AL AB-749,18 NRC 1197 n I (1983) party to whom monon for recusal es dire.acd, ALAB-748. IS NRC 1886 (1983)

~

referral of denial of recusal monon to Appeal Board, ALAB-749,18 NRC l198 (1983), ALAB-751, IS NRC 1314 (1983) i 10 C F R. 2.711 authority of Boards to hmet dmosery, LBP-83-79,18 NRC 1401 (1983) 75 l

l

1.EGAL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX EGilLATIONS REGlJLATIONS Appeal Board acceptance of Licenang Board referral of ruhns on adnussibahty of contentions.

IIC F t 2.713(c)(3)

• ut sty of a presadmg officer to regulate proceedmss, ALAB-748,18 NRC 1892,1193 (1933)

ALAB 741,18 NRC 375 (1983) cntena fw raising a new assue through a mouon to reopen; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1325 a3 (1983)

. 2 14 authority of a pres Jang officer to regulate proceedmgs; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1192 (1983)

I' dure of contenuon citmg valve inadequacies to meet specincity requirements of; LBP-8346,18 denial of petsuon to mtervene for purpose of seekms disquahficauon of Commissioner,(LI 83-25*

NRC 787 (1983) purpose of basis-with-specincity requirement for contenuons; LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1264 (1983) 18 NRC 330 (1983)

RC idenuncanon of parues m off the-record proceedms; LBP-8348,18 NRC 836 (1983) 8' ope of events eluch nught duirupt emplementauon of an emergency plan; LBP-83-52A,18 N satisfacuon of tweses requirement for contenuons, LBP-83 75A,18 NRC 1263 (1983) 279II983) satisfact on of coment on requirement for intervenhon, LBp-83-52A,18 NRC 268 (1983) time hmit for fihns contenuons; ALAB-737,18 NRC 172 a 4 (1983)

!!C F R 2 714(a) 10 CER. 2.714(d) apphcahon of cntena to motion to reopen the record, LBP-31-58,18 NRC 649 657 (1983) basis for a p.endmg officer's determmations on standing of intervenuon peutioners; LBP-8345,18 ealuaton of lateness factors weighs agamst late mtervenuon by peuuoner supportmg grant of NRC 776 (1983) facihty operaung hcerue; ALAB-743,18 NRC 394 (1983) factors to be conudered in ruhng on intervenuon peutsons; CLl-83-25,18 NRC 331 a.3 (1983) factors 6onsdered m evaluaung admissibihty of late-filed contenhons based on insutuhonally 10 C F.R 2.714(e) unavadable hcenung related documents, ALAB-737,18 NRC 172 n 4 (1983); CLI-83 23 18 authonty of a presidmg officer to regulate proceedmss; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1892,1193 (1983)

Board authonty to simphry and focus contentens; LBP-83-80,18 NRC 1405 n l (1983) e NRC 312 (1983) factors to be balanced for late interveettion; ALAB 734,18 NRC 17 (1983) 10 C F.R. 2.7 8 4a JusuGertion for late meervenuon by petitioner supportmg grant of facihty operatmg hcense'.

appeal of grant of unumely intervention petition; ALAB-747,18 NRC II70 (1983)

AL AB 743,18 NRC 392 (1983) appeal of order denying emervenuon pension of group favorms hcenans of nuclear power fac ALAB-743,18 NRC 389 (1983)

Lacssms Board dmretion in ruhng on late intervention; ALAB-74),18 NRC 396 a 36 (1983) appealabday d wJer ruhns on admissibehty d contenuons; MWA,18 E 2H M reasons for raisms comentions as Board issues; LBP 83-58,18 NRC 664 (1983) survey of orders passms on late intervention petsuons over ll-year penod, ALAB-743' 18 NRC 395 interlocutory appeals which are permitted; ALAB-741,18 NRC 375 a 6 (1953); ALAB-742,18 II983)

NRC 383 a 6 (1983) 10 C.F R. 2.714(a)(i) remedy for groups or indsviduals deprived of an opponunity to partscapate in Commissaan amount of tmie aliowed for Glms petitions to in ervene; LBP-83-42,18 NRC 116 (1983) proceedmas ALAW,18 E & M WM cniern for rassms a new issue through a monon to reopen; ALAB 753,18 NRC 1325 n.3 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 2.715 cntena for reopenmg the record, LBP-83-50,18 NRC 246 (1983) denial of petition to make hmited appearance statement concerning dawtuahncahon of a Commissaoner; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 330 (1983) fhto's balanced m favor of admemon of Gnancial quahGcatmns contention on tamchness grounds-participanon by State oRousmana as a pany and as an interested state; NW2A, H E 20 LBP-83-37,18 NRC 56 (1983) factces balanced m paums on late miersenuon petition; ALAB 74),18 NRC 390 n.3 (1983)*

(1983)

CLI-83-25,18 NRC 333 (1983); LBP-83-42,18 NRC 11517 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 2.715(a) factors controllms admission of late Gled enntenuons not met; LBP-83-38,18 NRC 63 (1983) acceptance of briefs supportms monon to reopen record; LBP-83-58,18 NRC 648 (1983) fadure of late Gled contennon on hot fr.1 ~ tal testmg to meet cntena of; L BP-83 75A,18 NRC 10 C.F.R. 2.715(c) 1261 (1983)

Ghng of pehuon by interested state as cause for a heanns Gve-factor test apphed for late intervenhon; ALAB 747,18 NRC 1870 n.3 (1983) identiGcation of parues in off-the-record proceedms; LBP-8348,18 NRC 836 (1983) participauon by interested mumcipahty in motion to reopen record;1 BP-83-58,18 NR need to amend intervention peution for change m idenuucs of authoriaans members of an representauon of mierested state by Pubhc Service Comnussion; LBP-8311,18 NRC 1 orgamianon; LBP-83-59,18 NRC 668 (1983) sizndard for acceptance of previously withdrawn, late-filed intervention pelatun, LBP-83-45,18 10 C.F.R. 2.715(d) means for a party to contnbute to the record other than as an intervenor ALAB-743,18 NRC 4 NRC 214 (1983) test for admissabihty of lateliled contenuons based on previously unavadable documents.'

n 48 (1983)

LBP-83-66, I8 NRC 796 (1983) 10 C F R. 2.715a (1983) weight given to asadabihty of other means to protect a petitioner's interests; LBP-83-42,18 NRC Licensing Board authority to consohdate and reword contenuons; LBP-83-52A,18 NRC II8 II983) 10 C.F.R. 2.717(a) length of time a preading ofGcer has jurialicuan over a proceedms; LBP-83-58,18 NRC 10 C.F R 2.714(a)(1)(a) good cruse demonstrated for late Ghng of Gnancial quahGcanons conscrmon; LBP-33-37,18 NRC 55 (1983)

II983I 10 C.F.R. 2.718(c) we ht given to somt cause factor m determemns admissibehty of late-Gled contenuons; CLI-83-23*

powers of a presidmg ofGeer to regulate a hearing; ALAB-749,18 NRC 1203 (1983) 18 NRC 313 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 2.718(i)

Appeal Board authonty to direct certiGcation oflegalissues; ALAB-737,18 NRC 171 (19 10 C.F R. 2,714(a)(2) content of micrvennon pennon, CLI 83-25,18 NRC 331 (1983) proscription against interlocutory appeals; ALAB-741,18 NRC 375 (1983) showing necessary for grant of darceted ceruncanon; ALAB-742,18 NRC 383 (1983) 10 C F R. 2.714(a)(3) factors balanced in decision to amend intervention peution; LBP-83-59,18 NRC 668 (1983) test apphed by Appeal Board an determming whether to accept Licensmg Board referral o ALAB-741,18 NRC 375 n 6 (1983) to C F R. 2.714(b) admissibihty of contentions addressms long-term effects of low-level sonizing radiation'.

time hmit on mouons scelting discrenonary directed ceruGcanon; ALAB-741,18 NRC 373 n.2 LBP-83-52A,18 NRC 274 (1983)

(1983) 76 77

I.ECAL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGlJLATION 7 E EGULATIONS 10 C F R. 2 718(p effect given to urupported demal in answer to summary disposinon monon; LBP-83-56,18 NRC

{u pt unumcly contenuons as Board issues, LBP.83 58,18 NRC 642 (1983) sty I a 430 (1983) 8 r 'd'chon over monon to reopen the record on enucality issue; LBP-83-62,18 standaM Iw &ternurung genme Wuc d matenal At NM,18 N M & nD W 10 C F.R. 2349(d) anvenam d special nuclear snatenals to demonstrate abserwe of 8enuine issue of matenal fact; 10 C I: R 2 720(Ot2) r[ aulhonty to mndinon a demal of a monon to quash a subpoena; l BP-83 64,18 NRC 772 10 C.F R. 2354(a)(3) reason for showing apphcant the oppatumsy to reply to intervenor's Gndings; LBP-83-81,18 NRC 10 C.F R. 2 720(h)(2)(i) r party whnh believes there are deGciencies m StaN teshmony; LBP-83-P,18 t n 10 C F 2.754 b)

I ax very; iBP-83-61,18 NRC 701-05 (1983) consequence of intervenor's fadure to fue proposed Gndmss on emergency planmns contenuon; 10 C 2 72 b LBP-83-43, is NRC 149 (1983) pl ment i ember of Licensms Board panel, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 468 (1983) default on contenuon for fadure to submit findmss; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 518 n.18 (1983)

~ '

10 C.F R. 2 758 replies to another party's answer to a monon, LBP-83-36,18 NRC 47 50 (1983) apphcabdity d, to special on-the-record proceedms; LBP-83-68,18 NRC 837-38 (1983) r ha of vmg party to reply to ressmse to motion; AL AB-756,18 hRC 1343 n.3 (1983) conuderation of validity of a Gnal rule in a licensms proceedmg; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 543 (1983)

' ~

contention questmmns use d hnear fracture mahand them &ctned sitack on sectsn Ma%

• • • 8 0

'cy concermns interlocutory appellate review; ALAB-737,18 NRC 174 (1983)

LBP-83-76,la NRC 1273 (1983) inty to refer its rulmss to Appeal Boards, ALAB 741 18 NRC 375 demal d request for waivu M Gnancial qual Gcatons rule; LBF8M, H N N N e og legal error as JusuGeshon for iruerlocutory appellaie review; hlAB-734,18 Nk 15 excephon to requirement for medical services arrangements; LBP-83-47,18 NRC 232 (1983) occurr

A. AB-742,18 NRC 383 n 6 ([983) forum for contenuon seekms mitigation measures beyond re8ulatory requirements, LBP-83-39,18 p wnpuon agamst mterlocutory appeals, AL AB-743,18 NRC 375 (1983)

NRC 87 (1983)

~

requirements for waiver of rule barnng Gnancial qual.Gcations contentbn not met; LBP-83-37,18 rden to esfy mtervention requirements; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 331 (1983)

NRC 54,56 (1983)

- ' f NRC personnel"; LBP 83-61,18 NRC 706 (198D showmg necessary for waiver of re8ulanons; LBP-83-52 A,18 NRC 270,271-72 (1983) de m o

10 C.F R 2.758(a)

~

factors considered in determming adequacy of subsutute oRsite emergerny plan; ALAB 743,18 ty of Bl rds to hrmt discovery; LBP 83 79.18 NRC 1401 (1983) justification for imposing more strmsent requnements on emergency diesel generators than provid I

NRC 401 n.47 (1983) y'7 oscry m NRC proceedings; LBP-83-72,18 NRC I225 (1983) in regulations; LBP-83-66,18 NRC 792 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 2358(b) jun d tmn over motion to compel discovery; DD-83-II,18 NRC 295 (1983) ground for waiver of rule barnns consideration of Gnancial quahGcations contention; LBP-83 (b) drr ck of pre Gled testmiony for special proceeding on emergency planmng; LBP-83-68,18 NRC 50 (198 )

10 C.F R. 2.743(b)(1) 10 C.F.R 2358(d)

Kope of deposinons, LBP-83 64,18 NRC 771 (1983) demal of request to certify financial quahncations contenuon to Commission; LBP-83-37,18 NRC I

2A43('I

'arcun s nces appropriate for use of officially noteccable material, ALAB 740,18 NRC 350 n.21 10 C.F R. 2360 Board authonty to raise defaulted issues; LBP-83 43,18 NRC 124,125 (1983) opranumty of parues to daugree wah portion of check valves issue ger, open by Board; LBP-83-57, status of Memorandum and Order as interlocutory order, LBP-83-60,18 NRC 675 n 2 (1983) 18 NRC 495 (1983) 10 C F.R. 2 760(a)

'y o Licensms Board decision when it has been appealed, LBP-83 58,18 NRC 644,645 (1983) 10 C F R 2 744 II f otection provided to NRC Stag tesumony; LBP-83-40,18 NRC 99,100 (1983) g R

auth oty to adopt untimely contentons as Board issues; LBP-83 58,11 NRC 642 (1983)

' * inua inspecuon of non-documentary informanon, LtW-83 51,18 NRC 254 (198t) catent of Licensms Board scruuny of uncontested genene unresolved safety issues. LBP-83-57,18 10 C l' R. 2 744(e)

NRC 465 (1983)

NRCS:44 provmon of informauon on conGdential invesugauons in advance of hearing; ALAB-735-Gndmss required pnot to issuance of operaung hcense; LBP-83-78,18 NRC 1I17 (194D 18 NN 23 (1983) reasons for raising contenuons as Board issues; LBP-33-58,18 NRC 664 (1983) to C F R 2.749 10 C.F.R. 2362 failure of intervenor's bnef to meet requirements of; ALAB-740,18 NRC 347 n 7 (1983) companson between summary disposanon and requirement that emt n Mr hugaWe-issue AL AB-739,18 NRC 337 n.2 (1983) 10 C.F R. 2.762(a) 10 C F R 2.749(t*)

'"*P"*

content of afGJ45sts supportmg monon for summary disN>sinon, AL AB-735' 18 NRC 24 (1983) junsdicuon to rule on admission of con'tentons filed pnnr to Gnal agency action; LBP-83-58,18 NRC 646 (IW3) 7, 73

LEG AL CITATION 51NDEX LEG AL CITATION 31NDEX R E " ULATIONS E EGULATIONS 10 C.F.R. 2, Appendia C 10 C F R. 2.764(O effccuveness of decision regardans medral servwes arrangements for contaminated injured members defimuon of " prompt" in content of identification and correcuon of nonconformances, LBP-83-y.

of pubhc; CLI-83-28,18 NRC 1155-56 (1983) 15 NRC 1373 (l983) 10 C F R. 2.770(a) definiuon of LevelIV vwlanons; LBP-83-41,18 NRC 108 (1983) authecity for sua sponte appellate review of Licenung Board decisions; LBP 83-58,18 NRC 644 imposanon of Nouce of Violation for material false statement by appimant; DD-83-17.18 N verity assigned to violations involving operator performance; DD-83-13.18 NRC 722 '

10 C.

R 2.77t(b) level comphance of monon for reconsideration of contentions filed prior to final agency action; (3933)

LBP-83-58,18 NRC 647 (1983) level of violations at Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 610 (1983)

NRC system of definics violations of Appendix B to Part 50; LBP 83 57,18 NRC 605 (1983) 10 C F R. 2.772 catension of ume for Commission review of Director's Decesson; CLI.83-21,18 NRC 158 n.1 (1983) 10 C.F.R 8.4 NRC audianty concerning financial quahficauons oflicensecs; CLI-83 21,18 NRC 159 n.3 (1983 10 C F R. 2.780(a)(2) communications that are en parte; ALAB-749, i8 NRC I203 (l983) 10 C.F.R. 20 (1983) standards governing sources of radiation and allowable emissions; LBP-83 52A,18 NRC 274 (198 10 C F.R. 2.785 10 C.F R. 20.2 (1983) jurisdicuon to rule on admisuon of contentions rited prior to final ageracy acnon, LBP-83 58,18 consideration of hazards from radioactive enussons that are within mandatory hmits; LBP-83-52A NRC 646 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 2.785(b)

IS NRC 274 (1983)

Appesi Board authority to direct cestificauon oflegal issues; ALAB-737,18 NRC 171 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 21 obhgauon of hcensee to report deficiencies to NRC; DD-83-19,18 NRC 1467 (1983) 10 C.F R 2.186 denial of petition for Commissenn review of appellate decision; CLI-83 29,18 NRC II59 (1983) 10 C.F R. 30.12 NRC author.ty over Fnergy Denartment's prime contractor; DD-8314,18 NRC 732 (1983) 10 C F R. 2.786(a) finahty of a decision followms appellate review; LBP 83-58,18 NRC 645 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50 basis for use of knear fracture mechames theory; LBP 83-76,18 NRC 1273 (1983) 10 C F.R. 2.786(b)(5) expiration of ume for Commission to act on peution for review of Appeal Board decision; esumate of an individual's radiation exposure from one year's operanon of Indian Point, CL1-83 32,18 NRC 1309 (1983) ggp.g343, gg NRC 1066 (1983) f,nancing of spent fuel disposiuon; CLl-83-21,18 NRC 161 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 2.788 rths of mtervenors to hearms on hcense entension request; CLI-83 27,18 NRC 1149 (1983) interpretsuon of ungle failure criterion; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 482 (1983) ign requirements regarding proiccuon against electromagnetic pulses; LBP-8346,18 ct d er mg whether to grant stay pending appeal; LBP-83-40,18 NRC 96 (1983) se pe f 10 C F.R. 2.790(a)(7)

NRC 783 (1983) jusufictuon required for mvesugatory records exempuon under; i.BP-8340,18 NRC 59 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50.33 NRC Staff provision of mformanon on confidentialinvestiganons in advance of hearms; ALAB 735, adequacy of WPPSS emergercy plans; LBP-8346,18 NRC 795 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50.33(O (1982) 18 NRC 22 (1983) consideranon of financial quahfications of an apphcant at operstmg hcense stage; ggp-g3 37, 10 C F R. 2 802 forum for addressms adequacy of regulations goveening transportanon of radioactive materials; NRC 54 (1983); LBP-83-49,18 NRC 240 (1983)

DD-8312,18 NRC 720 (1983) 10 C F R 50.33(g) 10 C.F.R. 2, Appendix A, f(c)(1) effect of TMI-2 accident on emergency response plans; ALAB-74),18 NRC 391 (1983)

Board ruthority to heae issues separately for a single facihty; LBP-83 77,18 NRC 1394 n.163 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50.34 contents of Prehminary and Final Safety Analysis Reports; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 125 (1983) intervennon on issues separated from constructen permit or operstmg hcense proceedmas; 10 C F R 50.34(a)

LBP-8342,18 NRC 116 (1983) allegauons of " patterns" of " breakdowns" in quahty assurance at Shoreham; LBP-83 sttus of a hcensms proceedmg when separate Boards are established to consider issues. ALAB-743, 18 NRC 397 n.38 (1983) 580 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50.34(a)(7) 10 C.F R. 2, Appendam A, IV(d) changes insututed at Midland to improve quahty assurance program; DD-83-16,18 NRC st1tus of t EM A employees as NRC personnel; LBP-8341,18 NRC 703 (1983) 10 C F R. 2, Appendix A, V(O(0, (2)

(ggg3) rehance upon conclusions of ACRS on uncontroverted issues; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 518 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50.34(b) 10 C.F.R. 2, Appenden A V(g)(D correction of inconsistencies in FSAR; ALAB.753,18 NRC 1329 (1983) parucipation by a party when it has not filed finJmss; LBP-8340,18 NRC 677 (1983) mclusion of Final Safety Analyss Report in operaung hcense apphcauon; 10 C F R. 2, A ppenJaz A. Vill (b)

(ggg3) re+ sons for ransms contennons as Baard issues; LBP-83-58,18 NRC 665 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50.34(b)(6)(ii) 10 C F.R. 2, ApWndia A Vill (b)(1) scope of Final Safety Analysis keport; ALAB-734,18 NRC 1315 (1983) t:mehness of an operatmg bcense apphcation; LBP-8346,18 NRC 781 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50.40 abihty of WPPSS tc implement quahiy assurance /quahty control program; LBP-834 10 C.F.R. 2. Appendix A, Vill (b)(2) and (3) abihty of WPPSS to implement quahay assurance /quahty control program; LBP-83-66,18 NRC 784 gg933)

(1983) 80 31

I.EGAL CITATIONS INDEX LEGAL CITATIONlINDEX REGULATIONS REGULATIONS D C F.a 50 40f b) (1983) 10 C.F.R 50.47(b)(7)

(acaphon on prohibital of conssderanon of applicant's Gnancial quah6 cations LBP-83-52A,18 fadure of Rockland County to meet rianning standards of, LBP 8348,18 NRC 930 (1983)

NRC 270,272 (19833 means for public educahon on emergency plannms; LBP-8348,18 NRC 942-43,954 (1983) 10 C Fa 50 40(c) 10 Cf.R. 50.47(b)(3) adequacy of WPPSS protechon asamst problems caused by electromagnene pulses, I BP-83-66,18 adequacy ofIndian Pomt emergency facility and equipment; LBP-8348,18 NRC 944,954 (1983)

NRC 783 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50.47(b)(9) l', C F R. 50 46 adequacy of accident assessment equipment at Indian Point; LBP-8348,18 NRC 944-45,954 (1983) validity of Shoreham's emergency core coohng system calculauons, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 473 (1983) 10 C F.R. 50.47(b)(10) 10 C F R. 50 47 adequacy of protect we acnons for Indian Pomt mgesnon pathway; LBP-8348,18 NRC 946,955, adequacy of WPPSS emergency plans; LBP-8346,18 NRC 795 (1983) 9t:0 n 86 (1983) failure of Rockland County to meet i annmg standards of, LBP-33-68,18 NRC 930 (1983) sIfect of applicant's credibihty on ns abehty to implement a subsutute emergency plan; AL AB-743, d

18 NRC 406 (1983)

FEM A conshasions concernmg emergency planning at Indian Point; LBP-8348,18 NRC 930 (1983) cliect of TMI 2 accident on emergency response plans; ALAB-743,18 NRC 391 (1983) need for distribution of potassium iodsde in plume EPZ; LBP-83-71,18 NRC 1808 (1983) entna of emer8ency plannmg roce around a nuclear facility, LBP-83 52A,18 NRC 277 (1983) need for inclusion of use of radioprotective drugs in emergency plans ALAB-754,18 NRC 1334 n.2 schedule for issuance of offsne emergency plan for River Bend facihty; LBP-83 52 A,18 NRC 268 (1983)

(19838 possible responses to an emergency; DD-83-15,18 NRC 742 (1983) st:aus of FFM A in NRC licenwns proceed ngs; L BP-8341,18 NRC 702 (1983) scope of developments durir.g radiological emergency for which response plans must be formulated; 10 C F R. 50 47(a)(1)

LBP-83-71,18 NRC Ill2 n.15 (1983) emergency plannmg findmgs necessary prior to assuance of operatmg license; ALAB 737,18 NRC signeScance of lack of agreement letters m State and County emergency plans; LBP-8348, it NRC 172 (1983), LBP-8340,18 NRC 678 (1983) 932 (1983) naiure of Licensang Board's 6ndings with respect to implementation of emergency plans; use of potassaum iodide to control radiologecal exposures; LBP-83-71,18 NRC 1809 n.lt (1983)

LBP-8348,18 NRC 845 n.12 (19833 10 C F.R. 50.47(b)(ll) purpose of emergency plans, LBP-83-52 A,18 NRC 277 (1981) adequacy of Indian Pomt's means for controlhns radiological exposure; LBP-8348,18 NRC 947-48 test fcoudgms adequacy of Indun Pomt roads for evacuauon LBP-83-68,18 NRC 989 (1983)

(1983) 10 C F.R. 50 47(a)(2) use of potaswum iodide so control radiological caposures; LBP 83-71,18 NRC 1109 n.Il (1983)

F LM A responsituhues concernmg emergency preparedness and evacuation routes DD 83-15, 18 10 C.F.R. 50 47(b)(12)

NRC 741 (1983) adequacy of Indirn Point arrangements to treat contammated iruured individuals; LBP-8348,18 st:tus of FEM A in NRC licensms proceedmas; LBP-83-61,18 NRC 702 (1983)

NRC 949-50,955 (1983) 10 C F R. 50 47(b) degree of safety problem that deficiency in emergency medical services presents; CLI-83 28,18 madequacies in emergency plannmg at Indian Pomt; L BP-83-68,18 NRC 818,839,929,931, NRC 1855-56 (1983)

T5455 (1983) demonstranon of assurance of adequacy of offsate medical services arrangements; LBP-83-47,18 10 C F R. 50 47(b)(!)

NRC 229,234-35 (1983) failrrt of Rockland County to meet planners standards of, I BP-8348,18 NRC 930 (1983) 10 C F R. 50 47(b)(13) sigm6cance of lack of agreement letters m State and County emergency plans; LBP-8348,18 NRC adequacy ofIndun Pomt post-accident recovery and reentry plannms; LBP-8348,18 NRC 950,955 932 (1983)

(1983) status of orgamrational control for emergency utuations at Indian Point; LBP-8348,18 NRC 931, 10 C.F.R. 50 47(b)(84) 933, 954 (1983) status of enercises and drdis at Indun Pomt to evaluate emergency response; LBP-8348,18 NRC 10 C F R 50 47(b)(2) 950 51, 955 (1983) adequacy of Indun Pome onste emergency plans; LBP-8348,18 NRC 933,954 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50.47(b)(15) 10 C F.R. 50 47(b)(3) adequacy of radiological emergency response trainmg at Indian Point; LBP-8348,18 NRC 952-53, relevance of failure to assign volunteer ambulance corps 10 specific facihues; LBP-8348,18 NRC 955 (1983) 934 (1983) failure of Rodland Cour.ty to meet planning standards of, LBP-8348,18 NRC 930 (1983) s"m6cance of lack of agreement letters in State aid County emergency plans, LBP-83-68,18 NRC to C.F R. 50 47(b)(16) 532, 935 (1983) area of weakness in Indian Pomt emergency plannmg effort; LBP-83-953,955 (1983) 10 C F R. 50 47(b)(4)

F EM A consluwons concernmg emergency plannmg at Indian Point; LBP-8348,18 NRC 930 (1983) complunce of Indun Pomt emergency classi6cahon system enh, LBP4348,18 NPC 935,954 10 C F R. 50.47(c)(2)

(1983) physecal condnions affectmg local emergency response plans; LBP-8348,18 NRC 1004 (1983) 10 C F R. 50 47(b)(5) size and configuranon of emergency planmns zone; LBP-3346,18 NRC 797 (1983) adequacy of Indun Pomt licensees' deciwonmakmg capabihtecs during radiological emergencies; 10 C.F R. 50.47(d)

LBP-83-68,18 NRC 936,940,954 (1983) status of Shoreham emergency plannmg issues remamms in controversy; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 623 criteru for evaluaung dc6ciencies in admmistranvc control of not:6 cation procedures durms Indian II983)

Pomt emergencies; i BP 8348, I8 NRC 975 (1983) 10 C F R. 50 48 10 C F R. 50 47(b)(6) adequacy of fire-protection measures at WPPSS; LBP-8346,18 NRC 790-91 (1983) adequacy of communnations with Indian Pomt emergency workers, LBP-8348,18 NRC 938, 94l-42, 954 (1983) 83 32

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGLANS LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS O C F R. 50 49 agmg requuements applicable to Shoreham electrical equapment; LBP 83 57,18 NRC 542-43 (1983) 10 C F R. 50.55a(d)(2) n.5 challenge to regulaten geverrung envaronmental quahGcanon of electncal equipment; LBP-83-39, clarifwaton of meaning of "date of order" in relauon to determimng apphcabshly of ASME Code 18 NRC 77 (1983) revision; LBP-8343,18 NRC 761 (1983) impact of court (mdmg of invahd pornons of final environmental quahfication rule; LBP-83-57,18 10 C.F R. 50.55a(s)

NRC 537 (1983) contention questoning use of hnear I,acture mechanes theory deemed attack on regulauon; requuemenes and guidance for environmental quahfication of electric equipment important to LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1273 (1983) safety; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 536 (1983) factor determaning mhrh edition of ASME Code es appleable to testing of valves; LBP 83-57,18 10 C F R. 50 49(b)(1)

NRC 490 (1983) dermiten of safety-related structures, systems, and components; 1BP-83-57,18 NRC 558 (1983) 10 C F.R. 50.57 10 C F R. 50 49(b)(2) findings reciuired prior to assu6nce of operaung hcense; f.BP-83-71,18NRC til7 (1983) comphance of Shoreham with envuonmental qual Gcanon and agmg requirements for electrical f 0 C F R. 50.57(a) equipment; L BP-83-57,18 NRC 544-45 (1983) findma necessary for issunnce of an operating hcense for a nuclear power plant; LBP-83-57,18 NRC Exclusion of nonsafety-relaico elecincal equipment from environmental quahGeauon; LBP-83 57, lg 464 (1983)

NRC 538-40 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50.57(a)(3) 10 C.F R 50 49(b)(3) just ficauon for requant.g remedial or compensatory actions for aste-specific problems; LBP-83-39,18 status of quahncanon of post-accident monstoring eqwpment at Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 540 NRC 71 (1983) f)983) 10 C F.R. 50.57(a)(3)(i) 10 C.F.R. 50.49(b)(3) and (d)(l) det,ee of quahty expected in constructen of nucicar power plants; ALAB 740,18 NRC 346 (1983) meerpretauon of " postulated accidents"; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 86 (1983) health and safety standard requued for issuance of operstmg hcense; ALAB-756,18 NRC I345 It C F R. 50 49(c)

(1983) equipment excluded from envuonmental quahficauon rule; LBP-85 57,18 NRC 537 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50.59 11 C F R. 50 49(i) correction ofinconsistencies in FS AR; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1329 (1983) nasufwauon for equipmene nos demonstrated to be fully envuonmentally qu;hGed; LBP-83 57,18 licensee aushurity to change procedures regardmg receipt of spent fuel; DD-8bl4,18 NRC 736 NIC 537,540,541 (1983)

(l983) 10 C F R. 50.49(k) 10 C F.R. 50.100 requirements and gueJan6e for environmental quahficauon of electrw equipment maportant to failure to address rock overbreak problem en Final Safety Ana'ysis Report as a material false safety, LBP 83-57,18 NRC 536 (1983) statement; L BP-8340,18 NRC 695 (1983) 10 C F i Sn 54 10 C.F.R. 50.109(a) adequacy of WPPSS emergency plans, LBP-83-66,18 NRC 795 (1983) justificanon for requirms remedial or compensatory actions for site-specific problems; LBP-83-39. It IS C F R. 50 54(f)

NRC 71 (1983) issuance of Demand for information by NRC Staff, DD 83-19,18 NRC 1468 n 6 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendam A 10 C F.R. 50 54(s)(2)(u) adequacy of Mark Il containment design to accommodate combined loads from transients and action taken by NRC to correct emergency preparedness deGciencies; DD-83-15,38 NRC 740 LOCA events; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 523 (1983)

(1983) comphance of WPPSS Project regardmg ashfall from Mount St. IIelens; LBP-8346,18 NRC 783 condiuons imposed for continued operauon of Indian Point Stauon; LBP-8348,18 NRC 843 n 8 (1983)

(1983) considerauon of occupahonal doses associated with handling and storage of spent fuel at Catamba; deadame for correcuon of emergency planning deGesenc es; LBP-8348,18 NRC 839 (1983)

LBP-83-56,18 NRC 441 (1983)

I: C F R. 50 55(b) and (d) definition of "amportant to safety"; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 555,556 (1983) umchness of an operaung twense apphcation; LBP-8346,18 NRC 781 (1983) hmitauons on scope of steam generator contenuon; LBP-8346,18 NRC 788 (1983) to C F R. 50 55(c) e&quacy of repuruns correcting of nonconfornunces at Perry; LbP-83-77,18 NRC 1384 (1983) 10 C F R. 50 Appendia A, Introduction construcuon problems to be reported by apphcant to NRC; LBP.83-43, ?8 NRC 127 (1983) defirution of single failure cntenon, L BP-83-57,18 NRC 480-82 (1983) megtauon of matenal fahe statement by Gims of report under; LBP-8340,18 NRC 695-96 (1983) jusuncanon for requinns remedial or compensatory actions for site-specific problems, LBP-83-39,18 NRC 71 (1983) obhamuon of hcensee to report deficiencies to NRC; DD-83-19,18 NRC 1467 (1983) repc:tmg of cracks and seepage m concrete by apphcant, ALAB-753,18 NRC 1325 (1983) 10 C F R. 50, Appendia A, Defiruuons and Esplanations defininon of sangle failure critermn; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 480 (1983) 10 C F R. 50.55(c)(I) need for prompt ident4 cation of quat.ty assurance deficiencies, LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1414 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50, Appendam A, GDC 1 abshly of WPPSS to implement quahty assurance /quahty control program; LBP-8346,18 NRC 784 10 C.F R. 50 55(e)(2)(i)

WPPSS comphance with, m reporung QA/QC breakdowns;1BP-8346,18 NRC 784 (1983)

(1983) 10 C F R. 50.55a allegauons of " patterns" of " breakdowns" in quahty assurance at Shoreham, LBP-83-57, is NRC 580-81 (1983) basis for m-service inspecteon and testmg of valves; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 488 (1983) requarements for classification and qualificanon of systems important to safety; LBP-83-57,18 NRC requar;ments for classaficauon and evahficaten of systems important to safety; LBP-83 57,18 NRC 560 (1983) 560 (1983) requuements of apphcants for nuclear power plant hcenses; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 125 (1983) 10 C.F G. 50 55a(d) apphcanon of ASME Code to use 4SA 307 steel m U-bolts; LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1427 (1983) g4 85

T-~~

f LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX LECAL CITATION 3 INDF.X REGULATIONS REGULATIONS 10 C F R. 50, Appendit A GDC 1,4 modification of, for graded quahty anurance program, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 560 (1983) adequacy of environmental quahrication of WPPSS safety-related equ pment; LBP-8346,18 NRC need for mastgement study to review management controls nahm quahty assurance organaiation; 788 (1983)

LBP-83-43,18 NRC 148 (1983) compliance of Comanche Peak p;pe support desaga with; LBP-8343. IS ;;RC 760 (1983) quahay assurance requiremems concermns use of staustsal samphng methodology; LBP-83 57,18 Lacenung Board interpretatson of regturements of, LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1413 (1983)

NRC 620 (1983) -

10 C F.R. So, Appendam A. GDC I, II,46 rehabihty of safety-related valves at Shoreham; LBP-83 57,18 NRC 483 (1983) adequacy of Shoreham safety-telated pipmg to meet requirements of, LBP-83-57, IS NRC 469 requirements for classifcaten and quahfacanon of systems important to safety; LBP 83 57,18 NRC (1983) 561 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50 Appends: A GDC 2 responsabihty for estabhshms and esecuung a quahty anurance program, LBP-3340,18 NRC 687 adequacy of design response spectrum and damping factors for Shoreham; LBP 83-57,18 NRC 504 (1983)

(1983) responsibehty for estabhshing and eseculms quahty assurance programs; LBP-83 71,18 NRC l134 10 C F R. 50, Appendas A GDC 4,16,50,51 and 52 (1983) adequacy of Shoreham's Mark Il containment to meet regulatory requirements; LBP-33-57,18 NRC scope of Final Safety Analysis Report AL AB-734,18 NRC 13 (1983)

Sil(1983) status of quality assurarne program fx operauonal phase of Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 583 10 C F R. 50, Appendix A. GDC 5 (1983) separaten of spent fuel storage facihues for mulu-unas reactors, LBP-83-56,18 NRC 437 (1983) 10 C F R. 50, Appendia B, Introduction 10 C F R. 50, Appendam A, GDC 17 interchangeabalety of the terms " quality assurance" and "quahey comrol"; ALAB-740,18 NRC 346 need for more strmsent requirements on emergency diesel generators than provided in regulations; n.3(1983)

LBP-8346,18 NRC 792 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix B, I exhability of en.ergency daesel 8enerators at Ferry; LBP-83-80,18 NRC 1405 (1983) independence required of quahty assurance organaistions; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1347 (1983)

I)C F R. 50, Appendas A, GDC 20 responsbehty for estabhshms and execulms a quahty assurance program; LBP-83-60,18 NRC 687 adequacy of Shoreham plant to meet requirements relatmg to anticipated transaents without scram; n.57 (1983)

LBP-33-57,18 NRC 499 & n.15 (1983) responsbehty for estabhshment and execution of quahty assurance program; DD-83-ll,18 NRC 296 13 C.F R. 50, Appendix A. GDC 23,34,35,37, and 40 (19836 possabahty of failure n(valves in Shoreham safety-related systems; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 476 (1983) to C F R. 50, Appendas B,I through XVlli 10 C F.R. 50, Appendit A, GDC 32 alleganons of "panerns" of " breakdowns" m qushty assurance at Shoreham; LBP-83 57,18 NRC scope ofinspection of sleeved steam generator tube; ALAB-739,18 NRC 341 n.9 (1983) 580-81 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendia A, GDC 34,35 10 C.F.R. 50, Appends: B: Il comphance of WPP55 concernmg decay heat removal an event of an accident; LBP-83-66,18 NRC bass for decanons on quahiy assurance issues of material face; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1373 (l983) 786 (1983) clasufscauon of violanon concerrung ahgnment of pipe support struts at Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 13 C F R. 50 Appendix A, GDC 56 NRC 609 (1983) violatoon of steam kne penetratans primary containment at Shoreham; LBP-33-57,18 NRC 600 scope of description required for qua'ity assurance procedures; ALAB-734,18 NRC 15 (1983)

(1983) 10 C.F R. 50, Appendan B, Ill 13 C.F.R. 50, Appendaces A and B classaficanos of volanon concernmg need for means to manually initiate protective achons at appisant's failure so have quahty assurance documents in its possession as veolahon of, DD-83-il, system level at Shoreham; LBP-83 57,18 NRC 605 (1983) 18 NRC 296 (1983) 10 C F R. 50, Appendia B Ill, XI il C.F R. 50, Appendas B adequacy of Shoreham's testing to estabissh hydrodynamic loads from a LOCA; LBP-83-57,18 NRC adequacy and quahey assurance of design verificahon program at Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 NRC Sil (1983) 524 (1983) 10 CER. 50, Appendix B, V adherence of Comanche Peak applsants to quahty assurance /qualaty control requerements of, classaficaten of violanon concernmg fire huards and cleanlaness procedures at Shoreham; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 125 (1983)

LEP-83 57,18 NRC 609 (1983) apphcation to nonsafety-selated stems; LBP-83-57, IS NRC 615 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendan B. V, VI cara*aihty of Byron Stauon apphcant for complymg mth requirements of, LBP-83-41,18 NRC 110 updr ans of nunuals for acusines affectmg quahty; LBP-83 57, it NRC 599 (1983)

(1983) 10 CER. 50, Appendix B,IX comphance of Callaway Plant mth quahty assurance criteria of. ALAB-740,18 NRC 347 n 6 (1983) apphcabehty of wekhns code requirements; ALAB-740,18 NRC 355 (1983) concerns with housekeeping conditions at Shoreham; LBP-33-57,18 NRC 598 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendan B XI definihon of " safety-related"; LBP-83-57.18 NRC 556 (1983)

Level IV violation at Byron Stanon; LBP-83-41, IS NRC 105 (1983) degree of quality assurance required for safety systems, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 578 (1983) 10 C F R. 50. Appendia B, XIll gutent to which an apphcant's construction quahty assurance must conform with regulations; comphance of Shoreham with requarements for storage of equipment and materials during construction, L BP-83-57,18 NRC 595,5% (1983)

ALAB-756,18 KRC 1351 (1983) interpsetation of quaher assurance emphcations of Part 50, App. A, GDC l and 4. LBP-83-81,18 10 C.F R 50 Appendan B XV NRC 1413-15 (1983) adequacy of apphcant's quahty assurances procedures for deshng with nonconformances; justificaten for pmmptness requirement of, LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1424 (1983) 4 ALAB-740,18 NRC 358 n.63 (1983) major concern raised from review of Inspection and Enforcement program at Shoreham; LBP-83 57, l

18 NRC 604 (1981)

I l

e6 87

-- ~.

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX LEG AL CITATION J INDEX REGULATIONS E EG ULATIONS 10 C.F R. 50, Appendia B XVI basis for decisions on quahty assurance issues of material fact; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1373 (1983) ne w supplernental e mnental unpact statenwns pnw to issuance ow-power hces.se; consequence of apphcant's fadure to file nonconformance reports; LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1425 (1983) need for prompt idenuficahon and correchon of noncoriformances, LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1368,1387 (1983) 10 C.F R. 51.20 adequacy of assessment ofinteraction besmeen WPPSS proiect and nearby rxlearkhemical problems with cable separaten at Shoreham; LBP 33-57,18 NRC 600 (1983) 10 C.F.0 50, Appendia B, XVI and XVill facihties; LBP-3346,18 NRC 794-95 (1983) calculauon of releases from transportauon and disposal oflow-level wastes; LBP-33-56,18 NRC 440 legibehty required of power plant drawings LBP-83-57,18 NRC 583 (1983) 10 C.F.0 50 Appendix B, XVII (1983)

W aM (c),

21. R2Mc) need for ap,>hcant to maintain possesmon of design documents, DD-83-il,18 NRC 296-97 (1983) adequacy of human cost estimate for WPPSS project; LBP-8346. IS NRC 781 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50, Appends:B, XVigg R.

2M quahty assurance requirements concernmg use of stausucal sampling methodology; LBP-83-57* 18 NRC 620 (1983) modificauon of Final Environmental Statement; LBP-83-36,18 NRC 48 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 55.33 IlC.F.R. 50, Appendia E adequacy of WPPSS emergency plans; LBP-8346,18 NRC 795 (1983) requirements for renewal of reactor operator brense; CLI-83-20,18 NRC 4 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 60 comphance of Comanche Peak facihty with emergency plannmg reqoirements of; LBP-83-43,18 NRC I49 (1983) determimns consistency of DOE's siting guidehnes for nucleas waste repositones with; CLI-83-26, 18 NRC 1848 n.3 (1983) inadequacies in emergency plannmg at Indian Pomt; LBP-8348,18 NRC 929 (1983) 10 C F.R. 60.11 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendia E, IV D adegoacy of Indian Pomt hcensees' decrsionmaking capabi?ines dunns radiological emergencies; Propmed steps fw NRC concurrence in DOE's siting guidelines for nucicar waste repositories; LBP-8348,18 NRC 936 (1983)

DPRM-83-3,18 NRC 1475 (19830 10 C.F.R. 70.18 10 C.F.R. 50. Appendia E, IV D.2 NRC authority over Energy Department's prime contractor; DD-83-14,18 NRC 732 (1983) responsibahty for acuvaung sirens durms radiological emergency; LBP-8348,18 NRC 937 (1983) 10 C.F R. 70.24 30 C.F.R. 50, Appenden E. IV.D.3 considerau n d occupanonal doses associated with handling and storage of spent fuel at Catawt a; conformance ofIndian Pomt notification procedures with; LBP-8348,18 NRC 975 (1983) 6,M N m W D cntena for evaluatmg deficiencies in admmistrauve control of nouficahon procedures during Indian 10 C.F.R. 78 Pomt emergencies, LBP-8348,18 NRC 975 (1983) 10 C F R. 50 Appemhz E, IV.E 8 adequacy of regulatory requirements with respect to safety of radioactive material transportation; C M MR M&R H MC m (MD ume in which Frnergency Operations Facihty must become fuity functional followmg declaration of authority over shipmenis of hcensed materials; DD-83-12,18 NRC 785 n.2 (1983) site emergency; CLI-83-22,18 NRC 307 (1983) 10 C F R. 50, Appendia E, IV F requirements to be met when transporting radsoscuve materials; DD-83-12,18 NRC 714 (1983) adequacy of radiological emergency response trainmg at Indian Point, LBP 8148,18 NRC 952 10 C.F.R. 71, Subparts D through II (1983) conditions that spent fuel casks are designed to withstand; DD-83-14,18 NRC 733 n.7 (1983) 10 C.F R 50, Appendix E,1).F.!

10 C F R. 71, Subparts O and il status of exercises and dntis at Indian Point to evaluate emergency response; LBP-8348,18 NRC catent of quahty assurance program overseen by NRC staff for packaging of hcensed matenals; 951 (1983)

DD-83-12,18 NRC 716 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendan 11 10 C.F.R. 71.5 requiriments for momtoring reactor vessel fracture toughness; LBP-8348,18 NRC 903 (1983) authonty over shipments of hcensed materials; DD-8312,18 NRC 715 n.2 (1983) 10 C.F.R. 50. Appendix i 10 C.F.R. 71.12, as amended adequacy of design of Catawba spent fuel storage facihty to control effluent releases; LBP-83-56,18 requirement necessary to obtain authonty to dehver spent fuel to a carner for transport; DD-83-14, NRC 436 (1983) 18 NRC 732 (1983) method for calculatmg total body dose from fuel assembhes 5 years out-of-core and stored in 10 C.F.R. 7 8.31 Catawba spent fuct pooli LBP-83-56,18 NRC 437 (1983) authonty for review and approval of design of packaging of spent fuel; DD-83-12,18 NRC 716 scope of contenuons on health effects of radiological releases, LBP-83-66,18 NRC 782 (1983)

I3983) l 10 C.F.R. 71.5t(a) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendia I, Il D degree of comphance required of applicant regardmg done hmitations LBP-83-66,18 NRC 782 packaging fw transpat d spent fuel, DD-83-12,18 NRC 716 (1983)

(1983) 10 C.F.R. 71.73 durability of casks for transport of spent fuel; DD-83-12,18 NRC 716 (1983) 10 C F.R. 50, Appendia K l

conformance of WPPSS emergency core coohng system computer model with; LBP-83-66,18 NRC 10 C.F.R. 78.73(c)(l) 790 (1983) tests to which spent fuel casks are subjected; DD-83-12,18 NRC 718 (1983) 10 C F R. 78.801 vahdity of Shoreham's ce*ergency core coohng system calcklations; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 473 (198'3) authonty for review and approval of quahty assurance program for packaging of spent fuel; 10 CIR. 50, Appendiz R adequacy of fire-protection measures at WPPSS; LDP-83-66,18 NRC 790 91 (1983)

DD-83-l2,18 NRC 786 (1983) 10 C.F R. 50, Appendix R, il I_5 amount of ume sufficient to nutigate fadure of cooling trains m spent fuel pool; LBP-83-56,18 NRC 425 (1983)

I l

e 88 89

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTES i

l Adminntranve Procedure Act,7(d),5 US C. 556(e) responses to olTicially notweable matenal, ALAB-740. IS NRC 350 (1983) f' Atomic Energy Act,103,42 US C. 2133 (1976) requirements of apphcants for nuclear power plant licenses; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 125 (1983) l J

Atoms Energy Act,42 U.S C. 2018 et seg failure of Appeal Board to rule on question of interventen pehuoner's mierest for purpose of f

standang; ALAB-74),18 NRC 390 (1983)

Atomic Energy Act,42 U.S C. 2133(d),2232(a) degree of quahty expected in construction of nuclear power plants; AL AB 740,18 NRC 346 (1983) i Iwalth and safety standard required for issuance of operating lacense, ALAB-756,18 NRC 1345 (1983)

Atomac Energy Act, I 47 balance between measures used to protect sensitave information and nghts of parties in adjudicatory proceedmss, LBP-83-40,18 NRC 99 (1983)

Atomac Energy Act, let(c),42 U.S C. 220lic)

NRC authonty to conduct investigaten whde Grand Jury invesugation is under way; CLt-83 24,18 NRC 319 (1983)

Atomac Energy Act,182(a). 42 U.S C 2232(a) standard for judging adequacy of a tesams program, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 523 0983)

Atomac Energy Act,186,42 US C. 2236(a)

Commnsion authonty to take enforcement acten for matenal false statement; DD-83-17,18 NRC 1239 (1983) condauons appropnate for Commissaan revocation of a hcense; CLI-83-21,18 NRC 160 n.4 (1983) scope of matenal fahe statements; CLI-83-20,18 NRC 6 n.1 (1983)

Atomac Energy Act,189. 42 U.S C. 2239 abihty of NRC Staff to adequately represent an intervenor's interests; LBP-83 80,18 NRC 1407 n.lt(1983) adjudacatory hearmas m abwnce ofintervenors; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1873 n.18 0983) f concepts apphed in determining an antervenhon penhoner's anteresis; CLI 83 25,18 NRC 332 (1983) need so renotre a heanns held an abeyance for 10 years, LBP-83-73,18 NRC 1236 (1983) 1 purpose of provadang hearms rights to pnvate citizens and organizahons; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1875 (1983) pubhc interest consaderations in requinns StatT divulsence of sensative information; LBP-83-40,18 NRC 101 (1983) right c(intervenor to queshon propnety of NRC StalT approval of physacal secunty plan, LBP-8347, 18 NRC 808 (1983)

Atomic Energy Act,189a,42 US C. 2239(a)

Commissaan attuude toward tardy pehtooners, ALAB-743,18 NRC 396 n 37 (1983) capansmo of spent fuel pool without formal construction permit amendment, LBP-83-56,18 NRC 428 (1983) need for a heanns to obtain an operahng heense; LBP-83-45,18 NRC 215 (1983) standard for granhns a heanng; LBP-83 42,18 NRC 114 (1983) weight given to good cause factor in determinang admissabahty of late-filed contentens; CLf-83-23, 18 NRC 313 (1983) 93

e s

LEGAL CITATIONS IN DEX STATUTES me f

M.

Atomae Energy Act,192(b)(0,42 U.S C. 2242(b)(3) and (2)

-j cavironmental findmgs necessary far issuance of temporary operatmg hcense; LBP-33-57,18 NRC Y

632 (1983)

=

Atomac Energy Act,234 imposition of penalties for materut false statements; CLI-83-20,18 NRC 3, 54 (1983)

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX Atomac Energy Act,42 U.S C. 2271 l

OTIIERS d-right of NRC to brief Justsce Departer.ent on informaton m ats possession; CLi-83-24,18 NRC 320 l

[

n8(1983)

~

Commumcations Act. 47 U.S C. 503(b)(l) l h

mterpretation of "contmuing velation"; CLI-83-20,18 NRC 6 (1983)

Department of Energy Organuation Act of 1977,404,42 U.S C. 7174 Fed. R. Osv. P. 56(c)

ALAB-735' 18 NRC 24 (1983) 7 reason that Congress did not make NRC concurrence with DOE astmg guidelmes a pubhc Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3 3(a)(3) (

3) rulemakmg; DPRM-83 3' 18 NRC 1480 n 6 (191:3) j responubihty of counsel regarding citations of legal authority adverse to its position; ALAB-i-

12 aport Tradmg Company Act of1982,15 U.S C. 4017,4020 NRC 18 74 a 21 (1983) concurrence of one agency with another agency's actions as rulemaking; CLI-83-26,18 NRC 1845 1975 U.S Code Cong. & Ad. News 225942 r

(1983)

Freedom ofinformation Act,5 U.S C. 552(b)(3) insurance oc shipinents of spent fuel, DD-83-14,18 NRC 735 n.10 (1983) documents covered by executive privdege; LBP-83-72,18 NRC 1225 (1983) l 2 3. Weinstein, Evidence 1503(a)(2)l0ll

~

apphcabihty of attorney chent privilege to attorney advice in a nonlesal capacity; LBP-83-70, It llaardous Materials Transportation Act Hf MTA),49 U.S C.1801 12 6

2--

authority over routmg of radanactive shipments; DD-81-12. IS NRC 715 (1983); DD-83-14,18 l

NRC 733 n.6 (1983) 2 J. Wemstein, Evidence 1503(b)l06) at 50340 (1982) f excepten to rule that presence d thud puny hoys auwneNem WW WW. M N l

Nanonal Environmental Pohey Act,42 U.S C. 4332 m

I nenung Board jurisdiction over transhipments of spent fuel; ALAB-741,18 NRC 378 (1983)

VIII W'gmore, Evioence i 2291, p. 545 (McNaughton Rev 1961) 1982-83NRC Authoruation Act, II, Pub. L No.97-415 nn en I findmgs necessary for issuance of temporary operatmg hcense; LBP-83 57,18 NRC

?

en i y

I de e { 2303 M ughton R v I I Nutlear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982, ll2(a)* 42 U'S C.10'3-26 18 NRC 1840 II42 (1983)

Vill Wi more Evidence i 2331, pP. 599403 (McNaughton Rev. l%ll 132(a) w Commsssen concurrence under, as rulemakmg; CL1-8 8

Nuclear Wasic Pohcy Act of1982,302(a)(5)(b) Pub. L No.,

'""*"nication between attorney and thens, which as not confidentsal; LBP-83-70,18 NRC 1100 97-425,96 Stat. 2201,2258

_C responsibehty for copmg with radioactive wastes prior to 1998; ALAB-741,18 NRC 377 (1983)

VIII *'8"*** E*sde"'# i 2327' 636 638 (McNaughon Rev.1%1)

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of1982,306, Pub. L. No.97-425 requirements for simulator trammg of control room operators; LBP-83-75,18 NRC 1257 (1983)

P"'p

, g,g, g,,

aiver d t neyEhent pnvdege;1 BP-83-70,18 NRC 1101 (1983)

--Y-Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of1982,42 U.S C.10,101 federal fundmg for disposal of spent fuel; CLI 83-21,18 NRC 161 (1983)

P N.Y. Eacc. Law, Art 2-8 (Consol.1982)

I responstahnes o(State and Local governments durms radaological emergency; LBP-3348,18 NRC 932 n.58 (1983)

Surface Mmmg Control and Reclamaton Act of 1977,501(a),30 U.S C.1251 F

responsibehty of Secretary of Interior concernmg surface coal mming and reclamation; CLI 83-26, 18 NRC 1844 (1983)

Surface Mmms Contrei and Reclamatum Act of1977,516(4),30 U.S C.1266(a) concurrence of one agency with another agency's actions as rulem4kms; CLI-83-26,18 NRC 1844 Y

n.2 (1983) m

=

r

-E

=

b m

F-94 95 M

S

SUBJECT INDEX ACCIDENT (S) class 9 Commission policy on considering; CLI-83-32,18 NRC 1309 (1983)

NRC Sil (1983) consequence and probabihty testimony on Indian Pomt, scope of; LBP-8348,18 consideration of enternal iratiators of, in Limerick probabilistic risk assessment; LBP-83 39,18 NRC 67 (1983) core melt, estimation of probability of, at Limerick facihty; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 (1983)

J

~

groups within NRC accident spectrum, descriptions of; LBP-8348,18 NRC 811 (1983) loss of coolant, rnwor suppression pool loads occurring during; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) loss of coolant, need for consideration of stress on pipe supports during; LBP-83-33,18 NRC 27

~~

(1983) postulated, dermition of; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 (1983) acquences for Indian Pomt, postulated with plant damage states and frequencies; LBP-8348,18 NRC Sil (1983) sequences for Shoreham, deterrnination of which shouH be considered within design basis; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) sequences, groupmg of, into plant damage states; LBP-8348,18 NRC Sll (1983) i severe, in Catawba spent fuel storage facihty, potential for; LBP 83 56,18 NRC 421 (1983)

ADJUDICATORY BOARDS role of,at operating license stage; ALAB-750,18 NRC 1205 (1983)

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS application of collateral estoppel to; LBP-83-34,18 NRC 36 (1983) source of bias that is disqualifying m; ALAB 748,18 NRC 1884 (1983)

AM ENDMENT(S) of Fmal Environmental Statement; LBP-83 36,18 NRC 45 (1983) of intervention petitions for change m identities of authorizing members of an organization; LBP-83 59,18 NRC 667 (1983) to DOE salms guidehnes for nuclear waste repositories, need for NRC concurrence m; DPRM 83-3, is NRC 1473 (1983)

See also Operstmg Liceng Amendment Proceeding AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY CODE apphcability of, to nuclear plants; LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983)

ANTICIPATED TRANSIENTS WITilOUT SCR AM at Comanche Peak, status of procedures for deshng with, LBP-83-43,18 NRC 121 (1983) at Shoreham, adequacy of means to mitigate; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

APPEAL BOARD (S) advisory opinions by; ALAB 743,18 NRC 387 (1983) authority to direct certification of legal issues raised in pending Licensing Board proc $edmas; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (1983) jurisdiction over request for reconsideration of environmental quahfication issue; ALAB-744,18 NRC 743 (1983) jurisdiction to consider reopenmg request on issue addressed in decision that has become admimstratively final; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1321 (1993) scope of sua spi nte review by; ALAB-739,18 NRC 335 (1983)

~

APPE AL (S) criteria for determining whether to grant stay Mndms; LBP-83 40,18 NRC 93 (1983) interlocutory, legal error as justification for; ALAB-734,18 NRC 11 (1983) 97

SUBJECT INDEX SUBJECT INDEX mactiocutory, of Licensms Board ruims, showmg necessary for; ALAB-734,18 NRC II (1983);

COGENERATION AL AB-735,18 NRC 19 (1983) substitutma of, for Indian Point, LBP-83-68,18 NRC 811 (1983) macrksutory, potential of Lscensing Board error fut expense and delay as cause for; ALAB-741,18 COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL NRC 371 (1983) appheatson of decision by Secretary of Labor to hcensms acten, by operation of, LBP-83-34,18 of Lscensmg Board grant oflate miervention, burden on party seeking; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1167 NRC 36 (1983)

(1983)

COLLATERAL ORDER DOCTRINE ASME CODE apphcanon of, to disclosure order; AL AB 735,18 NRC 19 (1983)

Licensms Board meerpretanon of, LBP-83-33,18 NRC 27 (1983)

COMMUNICATIONS reizieonship of General Design Criteru to; LBP-8343,18 NRC 759 (1983) between employees and corporate counsel, treatment of, as privileged, CLI-83-31,18 NRC 1303 AUTOM AllC DLPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM (1983) kcic for Limernk facchty, nnhficaten of, LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 (1983)

See also Es Parte Communications AUXILIARY II EDW ATER SYSTEM COMPUTER CODES Rtr:cho Seco, relubehty of proponcJ rnodefications to; ALAB-746,18 NRC 749 (1983)

MARCll, CORRAL, and CRAC, for analys s of plant damage states, description of; LBP-8348,18 B AYES' TilLOR LM NRC 815 (1983) cpphcation of, to Indun Pums nsk assessment; LBP-8348,18 NRC 8 tl (1983)

CONCRETE BIAS basemas for Comanche Peak contamment, cracks in; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983) desquahfung, m admmistranve proceedmss, source of, ALAB-748,18 NRC 1184 (1983);

dental, use of, et Comanche Peak; LBP-8340,18 NRC 672 (1983)

Al AB-749,18 NRC 1895 (1983) techn, cal discussion of cracking and moisture in; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1321 (1983) disqu.difymg, mun:e of, AL AB-751,18 NRC 1313 (1983)

CONFIDENTIALITY from cairajudicut sources, demonstration of. ALAB-749,18 NRC 1195 (1983) informant, reason for Commission review of CL I 83-30,18 NRC 1164 (1983)

BORON of matters related to ongoing investigations by NRC Staff, ALAB-735,18 NRC 19 (1983) mjectmn tank at Comanche Peak, reasons for eliminaten of, LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983)

CONSERVATION BRIL FS subst4tution of, for Indian Point; LBP-8348,18 NRC 811 (1983) aprellate, content of, ALAB-740,18 NRC 343 (1983)

CONSOLIDATION cppellate, rewonsabahtses of parties concerni g content of. ALAB-739,18 NRC 335 (1983) j of proceedmss to convert operating license from provisional to full-term and show cause order BURDLN concernmg hquefaction potential; ALAB-733,18 NRC 9 (1983) of persuasson m specul "off the record proceeding; LBP-8348,18 NRC Sil (1983)

CONST RUCTION on appe si, of party seeking overturn of Licensms Board grant oflate intervention; ALAB-747,13 defects at WPPSS, admission of contennon allegms; LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983)

NRC 1167 (1983) errors, vulnerabihty of Limenck facihty to; LBP-83-39,18 NPC 67 (1983) problems at Midland Plant, hst of; DD-83-16. IS NRC 1823 (1983) on proponent of moton to reopen record, AL AB-753,18 NRC 1328 0983); ALAB-756,18 NRC 1340 (1983) l' quahty required by Atomic Energy Act, degree of; ALAB ?40,18 NRC 343 0983)

CANCEL L ATION CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (S) of beihty, termmaton of appellate jurisdiction followms; ALAB-752,18 NRC 1318 0983)

Midland, modificanon of, DD-83-16,18 NRC 1823 (1983)

CANCLR withdrawal of application for, without prejudice; LBP-83 78,18 NRC 1398 (1983) considerahon of nsk of, in Lamenck probabiksuc nsk assessment; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 0983)

CONTAINMENT CASK DROP Comanche Peak, cracks m concrete basemat of, LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 0983) mio Catamba spent fuel puoi, possibihty of, LBP-83-56,18 NRC 4210983) cracks caused by remedial sods settlement schons, denial of monon to reopen record on, CERilFICATION LBP-83-50,18 NRC 242 (1983) of quahey assurance mapectors at Perry; LBP-83 74,18 NRC 1241 (1983)

Mark 18 at Shoreham, abstity of, to withstand simultaneous LOCA and transaent event loads; See tho Directed Ceruficaten LDP-33-57,18 NRC 445 0983)

CllLMICAL EFTLUENTS See also Fdtered Vented Containment System of Massessappi Rever, potentul for synergism between Waterford radioachve releases and; seperate, to relieve escess pressure from accedents and transients at Indian Point, need for; AL AB-75),18 NRC 13210983); LBP-83-52A,18 NRC 265 U983) l LBP-8348. IS NRC 8110983)

CIRCUL ATJON l

CONTENTION (S) natural, for decay heat removal followmg an accident, adequacy of, LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983) authonty of Boards to simphfy and focus, LBP-83-80,18 NRC 1404 0983)

CITATIONS based on misunderstandmg or error, admissibihty of, LBP-83 76,18 NRC I266 0983) legrl, responsabihues of partees regardmg accuracy and completeness of, ALAB-747,18 NRC 1167 consideration of ments of, at pleadmg stage; LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 0983) 0983); LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1266 0933) degree of specificity requared for admission of, LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1266 0983)

CIVIL PENALTIES genenc issues as the sutgects of; LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1266 (1983) proposed, for matenal fahe statements and improper implementation of operator retraining late-filed, based on institutional!y unavadable hcensing-relaat documents, tests for admission of; program, CLI-83-20,18 NRC I 0983)

ALAB-734,18 NRC 110983), LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 ;1983)

CLAMS, ASIAllC late-filed, factors balanced in determming admissebshty of; C1.I-83-23,18 NRC 311 (1983) fouhng of maake/daharge structures by; LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 0983) latofiled, good cause for; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 0983)

CLASSIFICATION late-filed, on special nuclear matertsis hcense raised in opcNias hcense proceeding, admissibehty of systems important to safety at Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) of; LBP-83-38,18 NRC 610983)

See also Emergency Classification System late-filed, which have potentaal to unduly delay pn red ng admissibduy of; LBP-83-75A,18 NRC 1260 (1983) 98 8

=m-__m

~

ir m--

i SUBJECT INDEX SUBJECT INDEX hsung of deficiencies as a basis for; LBP-83-80,18 NIC 1404 (l983) of"NRC personnel"; LBP-8343,18 NRC 700 (1983) loss of good cause for untimely films o ; LSP-33 39,18 NRC 67 (1983) of breakdown in quahty assurance; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) r nontimely submission of; LBP-83-37,18 NRC 52 (1983) of systems interaction; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) nonumely, showing necessary,in atnence of good cause, on other four criteria for admissaan of, See also Inscrpretsuon LBP-83 58,18 NRC 640 (1983)

DELAY purposes for requiring submissaon of bases for; LBP-83 76,18 NRC I266 (1983) between a discovery deadline and a hearing as ground for reopening discovery; LBP 83-79,18 NRC quahfacahons of emperts who prepare documents as the subject of; LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1266 (1983) 1400 (1983) reasons for ransms as Board issues under sua sponte authority; LBP-83-58,18 NRC 640 (1983) of proceedans by late intervention, weight given to potential for; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1867 (1983) requirements for special " oft the record" proceedms; LBP-83-68,18 NRC 811 (1983)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY submetied after close of the record, criteria to be satafaed for admissson of, LBP-83-58,18 NRC 640

ontracts for waste disposal services with; CLI-83-21,18 NRC 157 (1983) 11983) nuclear waste repository siaing guidehnes, effect of NRC's statutory concurrence with; CLI-83-26, time hmit for fihng; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (1983)

IS NRC 1839 (1983)

CONTROL ROOM sating guidehnes for nuclear waste repositories, NRC concurrence in; DPRM-83 3,18 NRC 1473 operators, adequacy of simulator tramma of, at Perry; LBP 83-75,18 NRC 1254 (1983)

(1981)

COOLANT DEPARTMENT OF TR ANSPORTATION brackash, at Indwn Point, need for chminanon of; LBP-8348, IS NRC Sil (1983) regulations governing transport of radioactive waste; DD-8312,18 NRC 713 (1983)

C(ULING SYSTEMS DEPOSITION of Catamba spent fuel pool, adequacy of; LBP-83 56,18 NRC 421 (1983) scope of questions asked on; LBP-83-64,18 NRC 766 (1983)

See also Emergency Core Coolms System; Reactor Coolant Systems DESIGN CCIE CATCllLR deficiencies at Comanche Peak, adequacy of QA system for identafication and correctioti of; need for, at Indian Pomt; LBP-8348,18NRC til (1983)

LBP-83-81, IS NRC 1410 (1983)

CORE MELT features required for protection agamst enemy attacks; LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983) frequency for Indsan Pomt, calculahon of, LBP-3348,18 NRC Sit (19831 of hnear-type supports, interpretation of ASME Code pertainmg to; LBP-83-33,18 NRC 27 (1983)

CORROSION See also Seismic Design of sacam generator at TMI-1; LBP-83-76,18 NRC I266 (1983)

DESIGN BASIS See aho Intergranular Stress Corrosson Crackms at Shoreham, determination of which accident sequences should be considered within; LBP-83-57, COST-BENEFIT 18 NRC 445 (1983) contenuon alleging errors that would not talt balance against assuance of operatmg hcense, htigabitary DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM of, LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983) i at WPPSS, admission of contention alleging defects in; LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983)

See aiso Ensnonmental Costs basis of, for Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

COUNSEL DIESEL GENERATOR (S) resolution of factual assues on basis of representations of, ALAB-735,18 NRC 19 (1983) admission of contention questioning reliabihty of, for emergency onsste power at Perry; LBP-83-80, responsibilanes of, when calms legal authority to a Board, ALAB-747,18 NRC 1867 (1983) is NRC 1404 (1983) rtha of, to approach witnesses for an opposms party; CLI-83-38,18 NRC 1303 (1983) building at Madisnd Plant, evaluanon of structural integrity of; DD-8316,18 NRC 1823 (1983)

CRITICALITY need for more stringent requirement on, than GDC 17 provides; LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983) of expanded spent fuel puoi at Catawba, potennal for; LBP-83-56,18 NRC 421 (1983)

DIRECTED CEPTIFICATION requirements for Big Roth Pomt spent fuel pool, comphance with; LBP-83-62,18 NRC 708 (1983) criteria for grant of; ALAB-734,18 NRC ll (1983); ALAB-735,18 NRC 19 (1983)

CROSS-EX A MIN ATION Board authority to expedste, LBP-33-55,18 NRC 415 (1983) l justificatir4 for; ALAB-741,18 NRC 371 (1983)

NRC pohey concerning; ALAB-742,18 NRC 380 (1983)

DAMPING value used at Shoreham, conmiency of, wath Regulatory Guides; LBP-83 37,18 NRC 445 (1983)

I of legal issues raised in pendmg Licensing Board proceedings; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (1983) petshons, responsabahues of parties in opposang; ALAB-741,18 NRC 371 (1983)

DECAY llEAT showing necessary for; ALAB-742,18 NRC 380 (1983) removal, adequacy of natural circulahon for; LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983)

I treatment of merits of tleim of Licensing Boarel ctror; ALAB-734,18 NRC II (1983)

DECIslON(S)

DISCOVERY matial, m " proposed" form, circumstances appropriate for issuance of; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 1I (19833 against FEM A; LBP-3341,18 NRC 700 (1983) partial matul, effecuseness of, for purposes of appellate review; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1365 (1983) deadhnes, establishment of, LBP-83-79,18 NRC 1400 (1983)

Licensing Board appointment of Interested State as lead intervenor to conduct; LBP-33-35,18 NRC pertsarung to grant or derual of late intervenhon, last of, ALAB-74),18 NRC 387 (1983) 40 (1983) proposed, responwbehues of parties to make specific objections to; LBP 8340,18 NRC 672 (1983) ugpubhshed, weight given to;1BP 83-77,18 NRC 1365 (1983)

I of informanon under protective order; LBP-83-53,18 NRC 282 (1983)

DEFAULT purpose of Board adoption of schedule for; LBP-33-80,18 NRC I404 (1983) i scope of questions asked on deposition; LBP-3344.18 NRC 766 (1983) i for failure to file required findmgs; LBP 83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983); LBP-8340,18 NRC 672 (1983) f pgswissAL DEFAULT LD ISSUES Licenwns Board pursuit of, LBP 8349,18 NRC 1084 (1983) of proceedmss, cause for; LBP-83-45,18 NRC 213 (1983)

DEE INITIONS DISPLACEMENT, FREE-END 3

of " final deugn"; LBP-33-81, II NRC 1410 (1983)

Licensang Board interpretanon of; LSP 83-33,18 NRC 27 (1983) of pipes and pipe supports at Comanche Peak, potenual for; LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983) of *smportant to safety,"" safety-related" and " safety 8rade"; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) let ISI 1

SUBJECT INDEX SUBJECT INDEX DISQUAllfICATION responsbehty for radeloswal assemnent and making Imtectne amn remnn@m M Mh tuus of motions for, AL AB-748,18 NRC IIS4 (1983) cts-83-22,18 NRC 299 (19831 determanssons c' motens for; AL AB-748,18 NRC II84 (1983)

EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONES of Commasuoner, dernal of pennon of non-party legal foundauon for; CLI $3-25, IB NRC 327 i

at Indian Point, effect of high populanon denssay on sze and configurauon of; LBP-8348,18 NRC (1983) gig (3933) of Lacensng Board judge, rued for referral of densat of motion for; ALAB 749,18 NRC i195 (1983) radius, vanaamns in; LBP-83-52 A,18 NRC 265 (1983) of Lacens.ng Board judge, standard for, AL AB-749, i8 NRC 1895 (1983)

See also Recusal vanaten m mze and configuraten of, LBP 8346,18 NRC 780 t1983)

DOCUMENTATION EMERGENCYPLANS for prosecuve coatmg quahty assurance at Comanche Peak, anegatmos of defkaencies m-l tusas of Commmaon dension regardang adequacy of ALAB 754 18 NRC 1333 (1983) 1BP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983) content of, concernmg use of radeprotecuve drugs; ALAB-18 NRC 1333 (19838 E ACT fiQU AK E5 insipient, hugatnhty of contenuon chauenging; WM responstahues ofI'EMA for rewww of LBP434I* 18 NRC 700 (1983). DD-8315,18 NRC 738 hugainhty of effect of, on emergency preparedness, CLI83-32,18 NRC 1309 (1983)

ECONOMIC IMPACTS gg9g3)

See also Evacuation of shutdown ofIndun Pomt. LBP-8348,18 NRC StI (1983)

EDDY CURRENT TISTING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS cntena for issuance of operaung hcenses; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 gg),

adequac of, to detect corros on of sleeved steam senerator tubes, ALAB-739,18 NRC 335 (1983) hugatnhty of elTects of earthquakes on; CLI-83-32,18 NRC 1309 (198 )

of steam generator tubes at TMI-1, rejecnon o(contentmo chauensms rehatnhty of; LBP-83 76,18 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS NRC 1266 (19838 Commmeon pahey regardmg formal aWwatwy wannss m CLI 83-27,18 NRC I146 (1983)

E L ECTRICAL CABLE (S)

ENVIRONMENT AL COSTS puhms, apphcanon of Perry quahty assurance process to; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1365 (1983) of operation of Catawba as a ssorage fachty for spent fiel fmm osw Duke faohtees. clanricanon of separauen of Class IE and nonflass IE, at Shoreham, adequacy of, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

Siaff andyss.J; LBP43-56,18 NRC 421 (1983)

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT at Shoreham, status of enuronmental quahficapon of, LBP-83 57. IS NRC 445 (1983) of shutJown ofIndian Poet, LBP 8348,18 NRC $11 (1983b consaJeranon of agmg of, at Lsmerkk feohty; IBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 (1983)

ENvipONMENT AL IMPACT ST ATEMENT enswonmental quahficanon of LBP-83 39,18 NRC 67 (1983) for special nuclear autenals hcense, necewty for preparanon of; LBP-83-38 18 NRC 6! (1983)

E LECTTOMAGNETIC PULSE for t,ansport of spent fuel, need for, DD-83 l4,18 NRC 726 (198 admmib hty of consentions mvolvird; LSP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983) supplemental, ne:d for, prmr to emume d low-po*Cf kCD*8'+

EMBE DDLD PL ATES See also Fmal Envuonmental statement as Callamay Plant, adequacy of weldmg of studs to; ALAB-740,18 NRC 343 (1983)

EN%IRONMENTAL QU ALIFICATION safety of, at Callaway Plant, ALAB-750,18 NRC 1205 (1983), AL AB-750A,18 NRC 1218 (1983) of safety-related equipment and components, huga y

g,qgg, i MbRITIL E MENT LBP-8346, is NRC 780 (1983) measurement of suscepub hty of reaaor vessel to fracture from, LbP-3348,18 NRC Sil (1983) of safety-related equspment at Shoreham, adequacy of, 83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) d pressure vessel at Pome Bea6h, potennal for; DD-83-13,18 NRC 728 (1983) of safety-related equipment, resolution of ass 6es on Ag g 144, t8 NRC 743 (1983)

E Mt CGENCY CL ASSifICATION SYSTEM rule, effecuve date of LBP 8346,18 NRC 780 (1983) at Ind4an Point, complante of, with snanruns standards; L BP 8348,18 NRC Sil (1983)

EQUIPMENT, S AI ETY-RELATFD E MERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM ht satnhty of contenuon quesuonmg adequacy of eavuonmenta quahficaten of LBP-3346,18 at Shurcham, ab.hty of, to rncet regulatory requirements regarJmg core spray dastnbuuon and l'

NRC 780 (1983) countercurrent flow LBP 83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) resoluten og mues comermas ennmnmsntag quagr;c no, of, ALAB-744,18 NRC 74) (1983)

}

Babcoth & Wdcon model, adtmssion of contenuon questm nang regulatory comphance of, See also Electrual Eqmpment LBP-83 66,18 NRC 780 (1983)

E RUPTION EMtRGENCY DIRECTOR

}

of Mount St. lietens, admassaan of contenuon questenmg sarety of plant an the event o(,

at TMI-8, responsatnhues of, CLI-83-22,18 NRC 299 (1983)

LBP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983)

LME"GE NCY OPE RATk)NS F4CILfTY LVACUATION i

deadhne for transfer of functions to, dunns radiological emergency at TMI-8, CLI-83 22, la NRC of Angola Pnson durms radiokwcal emergency at Raver Bend Stauon, plans for;1 BP-8342 A,18 l

299 (1983)

NRC 265 (1983)

EMLEGENCY PLANNING of chddren from Indun Poms area,g event 4g,,,,,,,,,cy,,a,qa,c, of plans for; at Cumana he Peak, status of, t BP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983)

LBP-8348,18 NRC 815 (1983) at Indian Pomt, status anJ degree of conformance of,1 BP 8348,18 NRC til (1983)

{

of petaans mthout vetacles, scht alchildren, and saval s imm gis gock romt vicinity dunns Board procedure for remedymg defeoencies en FEM A revece of, LBP 8340,18 NRC 672 (1983) l raJaologscal emergency, adequacy of plans fw; g

5 18 N'RC 738 (1983) components c(evacuanon ume esumates, ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (19831 plans for Mame Yankee plant, adequacy of, DD-b l

for meda6al servues arrangements. scope of, LBP-83-47,18 NRC 228 (1983) radius tot LameriLk facihty,incorporaten d, mio prot abahsts nsk assessment; LBP 83 39,18 NRC defacacnoes at Maine Yankee gJane, correction of DD-8315,18 NRC 738 (19838 67 (1983) for purpmc of spent fuel pool expansion, sausfacten of LBP-83-44,18 NRC 204 (1983) teme catamates, calculanon of, for Indian Pome; LBP-8348,18NRC St I (1983)

I l

general requarements for, ALAB-754,18 NRC 1333 (19836 time esumates, components of ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (1983) essues, need to resche. poor to assuance of low-power heense; L BP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

EVIDENCE t

requir;ments for destnbuteon of potassaum modede; LBP-83-71,18 NRC 1105 (1983)

I creditnhty of **tness givmg, LBP 8340, is NRC 672 (1983) l t

in I

t N-

~

SUBJECT INDEX e

a SUBJECT INDEX GENERIC ISSUES aeer asha a gP $3 8'**'"*8

C ensaneerms arsaments by qualafeed EX PARTE COMMUNICATMINS HARASSMENT constraants apphce iae so afy.

s HEALTH AND S AFETY standard fur grant of operating incense; ALAE-756,18 NRC 1340 0983)

&acream of,ALAg.M.18 RC 5 3

pu 8'c l'lmss, of resadts e(as reviews as; ALAt-738,18 NRC l

NRC Stairs -- - -

a 177 81983)

HEARING 45) rar-LSP-8345,18 NRC 774 0983) au horny so hold,is ahecace of vahd i..

achudicatory. resoluuan of factualissues in en baas of represcatances of counsel. ALA EXCEPTION (S) r,8cd freni pernas

'"*Ih"* 8'c'; LEP-8L77. IS NRC 5365 09833 N EC II III83I se rule chas %w s gas -WM kc catrgudscaat. ALAS-748.18 Nac 1834 0983) in the ahecace of esservenors. ALAB-747. IS NRC 1867 0983)

NRC Sil 0983) elf the record, appiscabdisy of 10 CI A, Pars 2 se raad -* of; LBP4348.18 EXEMPTION fug pg mon,%

re deteraumag whether formaata quaanry of strategic en campa. -* wuh Board order, need foe; LBP43418 NRC 208 098D os enforcement actaans. Cosamesmos policy regar&as. CLl43-27. IS NRC 1146 (1983) asecaal nuclear sal emats. lap 4167.18 NRC 802 0983)

~_ cause W. N83-45,18 E M N

'd. ppI*cau a f. so NRC docusments; Lar-83 40,18 NPO 93 098j) en operaums became _

remotscuss as opportuany for; LSP43-73.18 NRC 12310983)

See scheduing of, in hsha of suspenson of construcuoa; L3P43% 18 NRC 780 0983) fEDE3AL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

,,,,,m g e we prmlege im L3P4k73. 88 NRC 12310983)

HIGH PRESSURE INJECTION y

'I' creen y el as. DD4Ll5.18 NRC 738 0983) matus of, sa NRC bc HONE NG pic enasuaauon k AMM. M N HLTTZED VENTED TAl N YSTE at C H Pe, ma aa e

as in 80 8 II L R

ENTA 5 EN INEmW c8'ans *iccts an. LDP-83-36.18 NRC 45 0983) as Shoreham, violauons relaaed so; LDP43-57,18 NRC 445 0983)

FIN AL SAFETY ANALYSIS RLMRT IIURRICANE p%, g g,,,'

' "'*"""'clatans to adequacy of; CLI.8L23.18 NRC 3tl 0983) reducta d vulneraMay d In&an b 2. MM IS E M M consens g, ance Mgram b replacement parts and repanr work; M ROGEN controlsystems husatmhty of adequacy of.CLI-8L12.18 NRC 1309 0983)

ALAS-734 c

g geacrataca as Comanche Peak contanament, adequacy of uneans for deshng with FINANCIAL As51 STANCE

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,gg M

e y a provide; LSP-8b73,18 NgC 523I (198D FIN ANCIAL QUALgg 8t**

eperatans bcease stase of review; LBP-33 37, I8 NRC 52 0983) dem I d mote w poespone skapments d Wevel N%e waste t%h M % WW.

ILLI g,

g Mas ad-= et centeauce on; L3P43-49,18 18 NRC 783 i'983)

NRC 239 0983)

IMMEDIATE LFACTIVENESS of perual antaal d

= for purpmes of appellaie review. I SP43-77.18 NRC 1365 0983) of c"

'"j'conceras wah.CLI $3-21,18 NaC 557 0983)

'*"8"8 8'oc88dtass. LDP-41-52A.18 NRC 265 0983) of IMMEDI ATE EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW of Laccamas Board resohanon of snedical services emue;CLl43-28.18 NRC 1155 0983)

FINDINGS

weg,

9 a f a ou I r power plant. ALAS-740,18 NRC 343 0983)

INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS ACT bMMMM~"UUM defaut fur SD confidenuakty, reason for Comausuos review of decasson ca. CLI 83 30,18 NRC 1164 090 g

to 3 St. I NR 410

$**'

• eP i

" NW maternal and new ar8mments in support of, Lar 8341, gg INFORMATION LBP43-51,18 NRC 253 raar*'ases,en&as invesusanons and naspectmas,in camera receaps et.

l Nac g43 l

risha d

8""*"18 i"; L8P4343. IS NRC 4480 098D l

FIRE INSPL S

"' I *** P8"8 to L8P 8348,18 NRC 818 0983) pending, sa r=-ra production ofinformauon on. LSP-8F58. Is NRC 253 0983)

FIR rt T CT INTAKE /DISCH ARGE STRUCTURE poseanal for fouhag of, in both normal and emergency operaumg condenoas; LBP consename tw W 8eparatm of cables smue, L3P43% IS NRC 780 0983) ygn 780 098D handh w Ce a. Safe'y of procedures foe; lap 43% IS NRC 42109831 liceween WPPSS and sawrounens asaolear/chemiscal facaisses during as accadeal, adequa

^

I go,4,,,,g F

k pubhc health and safety from.CLI $3-27,18 NRC Bl46 (1983) assessment ef. LSP-83% IS NRC 780 0983) l canons ei apphtana no reccave; tgr43 38.18 NRC 68 0983, INTERESTED STATE l

Laccassag Board apposatment of, as lead saterve; ar. LSP-83-M. IS NRC 40 093D J

5,,,

l i

INTERGRANULAR STk[SS CORROSION CRACKING FUELPont

^ ; of conecauca questacasas efracacy of krhaus ad&uon to g,,,,, c.

P'** 888183t8as of; LSP4340. I8 NRC 672 0983) adfur-enduced, at TMI-l. <

Scc che Spent FM P"*3 l

prevent; LDP4L76,18 NRC 1266 0983; I

I l*5 i

g i

=- ;

svuner muI SUMECT INDEX INTIRPREfA(km of LEseems Beard so order preparaseos of supplences ao Final Eavneamensal 5saeceicas, 7 II I 8 LSP43-M,18 MBC45 0983) 88 L ser 8 3i R over s==f*=== fiend freen persial sosiaal decamans, L3P43-77, la NRC 136518943) el A%8E Cade by t I3* II NEC 27 (39838

• • er paente "=**=-""8 *ahe insieme and Mark Il raama==ama susues as Sherchasa, Laccamag Board d Cseacral Dei.ga C,

.4 gp g

• g C 'I U'83I See atto Def%

setemason of, L8P43-57,18 NRC 445 0983)

INTLT.At hor 5 heanags en the ab=eace af, ALAg-747. IS NRC 3 867 U'8 8 LEAK RATE DATA l=6 of hkC auttaan, se pro.hae hw **"*"* ISP 8L73,18 NRC 323815983, as TMI-2, an--= y a== ofinimEcosson af. CL343-24. Is NRC 315 0983) imiss8ed, as TMI-2. =an== no seapen record en means of; ALAS-738. IS NBC 177 09438 lare ear g, g Io recard by; Lar.8) 80, la NRC 4404 0983) thT! R%iNTWm LICENSING SOARD abuse of eusseessa sa sheansenal ofinservenor; CLI43-28, 88 NBC 3139 0983) am88kseyto hokiheanasen atise

• aus d ansames, pes g4," g( '3'd 'seuem fss;1SP4145,88 NRC 774 0983)

=en='* ahas ase apr==8=he% LSP43-77,18 NRC IM5 H983)

• " wee 8 pesmemer's miserens do aus eassa; aushoney so adess s -=====-===Aa==-a, LDP4346,18 NRC 78811983) r Iar 43-42, is htC 8 8218983, ausheney to W demsel of messoa ao quash a suhpeams, LDP4344. IS NBC 766 H983)

• h"C'etauaary, fanors connidentil an trams dm8m. IS NRC 327 0983)

• ='""a a= an pass afinac-fated --. -

pesassoas; ALAS-747,18 NRC ll67 H989 as special e4 she esterd= prace.gmg, g gr.gj i8 h"U 83I U'838 oneerpsenesses of ASedE en.ses-L3P43-33,18 NRC 27 4983) late, epens se ogsh pe % % %

y g UI4(alHHm) as plead *g as case far; J'nedissees in namese ----.a-a== precocengs; ALAS-739,18 NRC 335 0903)

ALAB-743 la HEC 387 glesj, 1*se.1a6camingguara d,g,,s,,,,,,,,,,g, 4LA,,747,18 NRC li6d H983)

W w muu W m as W W AW M h wM hamoa M h la'e 88 **prort *(a und.sy appsicasam u. ale, - u MW H W M H%

appealed so C -

lap 4342,18 NRC 788 098D Janaarama ever steema to reopen she record asser ima=ner* es sassaal dectmen; LSP43-58,18 NRC I

laas, Ins et occanuma 8'

I demale, ALAB-743,IS NgC 387 H94D 640 0903J lane. =cachs snes so aneh

1. 8 mund ruerd se elescrawanas grams of. ALAS-747,13 prendicsson to decade mauss, teamed an Operasaag bre==* proceeding, relevant so specsal awlear NRC 8867 H9gn

)

ematernais hcemme; L3P-83-34,18 NRC 61 (1963)

I Rate, ocaght gnen to poecasul lor det,y q g AgI~I4I. I8 NRC 1867 094D armhc8'em so especse seasacra aos embraced by noisce of opponummy of hesnes, Lar43-76,18 prhamma, amen amens d, lar %,8D eah **

"' "*"d8 "' ** *'saaseanos, I*N I er 8L59, la NRC.67 li prendicsson so order preparassoa of. pa,=*as so Fanni Esvaronmensas Seasement; LDP-83-M,18 P'"'"'an, mucas es, n.8-8L25, 38 h8C 327 0983I NRC 45 0983) penesons,l.se4ae4 go,,,

• ' ALAE-747. IS NRC 8 867 II98D ancess used in resolusson ofimmaes ALAS-740, IS NRC 343 0983) pesames, g4cadmg,,,,,,,,,,, g$,, L

, hAC 667 098D aka.y.m.a= es, so conspiese she record, LSP-83-52,18 NRC 2% 098D resseauma, resa8*a es, se 2 h resassues, ALAB-747,18 hRC 8 867 09sD panel mester, reparensens of, afeer clone af she serord, LSP-83-57,18 NRC 445 0983) peusacan, unsameg % g

'd *" ALAS-747,18 NRC II67 0943) reaanutemmenes, burden so %

{'

power af, so rule en scope of ass own pannen6:sen; LSP-83-58,18 NRC 640 0983)

" 90 I pursues of sua sponse assues; L8P43 75,18 NRC 1254 0983) shumang nesennary an abneme g g % g sardnaeus an iceLug. ALAB-743,18 NRC 387 II,gy masamely pensamas, g mg %,

"8 " ALAE-743,18 NRC 3871898D se.

of, ao anguere amso pending anve=n.y.naa= by NRC $ nan; LDP43-40,18 NRC 93 0 903) enmasancey, gur purpune d Wm C

. sleaul of pesahan far, CL3 83 2$,13NgC jyy sans apenic aushorny of, L9P4349,18 NRC 1084 0983) 098D INVE518GA1Nmt LICENSING PROCEEDINGS hRC, pesanelms Jugge orpanmesa sevenam as

. mehuray se conduct, G3 43-24,18 NRC 315 connulerance of appbcant's financial ~

sa, LSP43 524,38 NRC 265 6983) clices a semenc rulemakes on, CLl43-21,18 NRC 157 098D 19983a saasus of FEM A an. ESP 4341,18 NRC 700 098D

• "8mak dintueure of desaded nguramaa mbwe a'8*88'""8 shas are the subsecs of, ALAS-735,18 See also A4nuhcasary Procardsags, Operaung Laccase Amendianens Proceedsag, Operaung Lacease NCC 19 09:33 penda"8 * **mera prodias==a d ans.wmasuis "" igP.83-58,18 NRC 253 098D Pr~

e.

LIMESTONE It'CI5DICTka sesscepsabilesy so fracture dunas ha= nimf, LSP-eA3,18 NRC 122 0903) aPrehale, scrammasaus of, lugh,,, 8 gg 8 8'"Ce88as88a, ALAR-752,18 NRC !318 098D LIWTED APPEARANCE appenase, so coseeder %

for purpume of films ". "'- anosses; CL343-25, IS NRC 327 0983) m me has baome

• demnsr sa*cly fansl. ALAS-753,18 NR 7 I LINEAR FRACTURE MECHANICS

• I Appeal Buard a.*cr requess gar rego,,,,g,,,,,,, g ca*meneensal - "

asmue, ALA4-744, analyses of reassor caanpa=*=iss,Isogabdasy e(consessana quessaansas regulatory acceptatuhay of, IS NRC 743 0989 I SP-83-76 IS NBC 3266 0983) l el 1stensmg Skaarti en hcenne amie%F%s. ALA8-739,18 NRC 333 gg,8D I

of L atenems go.,d,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

"U en remaaJ masme has been LIQUEFACTN

- t.Cr.s.c s, Au.-m. it NRC 9 a D

• s'**ae.1 no C

- ggpgy4y, NRC l

d i nes

._d er mesma se ree,en,,,c, e,d,,ser smumace of amataal decuson, L5P-83-58,'

use of, so preveas sua(ur**<a l

LITillO M seress correanos aacha.4; LDP43 76,18 NRC 52t4 0983)

IS NRC 640 H98D of 1 accamasig Somed no deside no,es,,,,,,,,,

E

~ nnk annewncas, submacal dncuanum d, N8M, H W W

""I ****"a8* Imem=c, LBP 83-34,18 N 6

983 for Indiaan Poems pr d L mesmans Board en espeu,e maners aus catsaced *F =na" *Imppunmassy ef tscarmg E SP43-76, l1983)

I OOSE PART5 18 hCC l2d4 H98D prevensaan aaJ desasson of, as Indian Poems, ESP 4344,18 NRC 313189BD 846 347

,,n

~-

e 6

SUBJECT INDEX SUBJECT INDEX M ANAGEMENT CAPABILTTY

* D***r *nsal of motion to reopen the record on issue of; LBP-83 58.18 NRC 640 techmcal discussion of; LBP 8342,18 NRC 708 (1983) e y

NEW YOliK CITY M ATERIAL FAI.SE STATEMENT (S)

C mg qualsfications of indmdual operator, propmed civil penslues for; CLI-83-20,18 NRC I <

B NONT)NFORM ANCE REPORTS i

IConumhe Peak, dixouragement of; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983! +

?

!i

. e

{#

~

NOTICE d

untsmely proviuon of sign ficant new information by Iscensee LA

. NRC 177 (lyU of opportunity for hearing,jurisdicuon of Licensmg Bosedt to'expfore matters not e en applicant's FSAR, seriousness of, LBP-8349 18 NRC 1084 I88

~

~

/

's in hcensang apphcation, concernmg herbicide abin go c%

LBP-83 76,18 NRC 1266 (1983)

'8347'I8 NEC I289(!983

- \\ '

f t

NOTICE AND COMMENT MAX M LIKEllif00D PR!NCIPLE n NRC concurrence with nu6Icar waste reposatory siting guidehnes, Conreieion obhgauon to sismating accident sequence rate and confidcnce hmits at Indian Point; Lis'P-8348,18 provide; CLI 83-26,18 NRC 1839 (1983)

M

+

/

(1983)

NOTICE OF VIOLATION f

(;

for material false statement in licensing application, issuance of; D")-83-17,18 NRC 1289 (1983)

MEDICAL SERVICES for matctial false statements and improper implementation of operator retraining program; arrangements for radiahon-injured members of ge'rnerai t l8 pe of requirements for; CLI-83-20,18 NRC 1 (1983) ~

L8P 83-47,18 NRC 228 (1983)

~

avtalabilHy of, to treat people exposed to radean as's resuit of an accident at Limerick; 5

NOTIFICATION

• C

~

of radiolunical emergency, adequacy of Indian Point methods and procedures for; LBP-8348,18 LBP'83-39,18 NRC 67 (1983)

[ IIXuWress of decision regardmg ademacy d, si San Onofre CL t

• 8,18 NRC 1855 (1983)

NRC til (1983)

METECCOLOGICAL MOMTORING,

~

NRC STAFF h 5 Indan Pmnt Stanon; I CF4Hg,. gg pgc gy g rj993 injury to, thrm sh order to produce documents telatias so pendmg investigation; LBP-83-40,18 j

Y

/>

l

+

• NRC 93 (1983) representauon of an intervenor's interests by; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1167 (1983); LBP-83-80,18 4

e C""dkrahons s'IfA.ra Pomt during an achident, discussen of; LBP.g343,'gg pgg ggg gg99),

MISStLES NRC 1404 (19831

\\'

resolution ofissue of safety of embedded plates by; ALAB450,18 NRC 1205 (1983) moection and.nanntemnce of turbmes to revent generation of, LBP-83-46,'11 NRC 218' (1983) -

• f i

MtsSISSIPPI RIVER rewtution d assues by; ALAB446,18 W M MG potenhal for synersism tetween ra$oactive en*Nsions and chemical effluents in; LBP-83-52A,18 responsibihty to present evidence about allegations that are the subject of ongoms confidenua NRC 265 (l+33), -

investigauons; ALAB-735,18 NRC 19 (1983) i review MAR,langabihty d aMuacy of; LBP-83 57,18 NRC 445 (19W MONITC?.INCi /

t role of, at operatmg hcense stage; ALAB 750,18 NRC I205 (1983)

Post-accident radaahan, adequacy of, at Lisnerick facihty; LBP-83-39*

I NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS post-accident, af Shcrtham, sufGesency of schedule for compha"

't appiscabahty o* American Welding Society Code requirements to design of; ALAB440,18 eastrumentauon for; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) i S a teteysical Monnoring (1983) g

1. 8'** b"'

rnmfsion hussal ofits grant of review for; CLI-83-30,18 NRC ll64 (19f1)

NUCLEAR REGIAATORY COMMISSION I""

ns ructen practices at Comanche Peak because oh ! :P-83-43, gg g 33 authorny to impose civil penalties'odhnenwe for improper implementat',on of voluntary program; N

2 983)

CLI-83-20,18 NRC i (1983)

MOTMN(S) authority to invesugase matter that is the subsect of a pending Justice Department invesuganon; disposstbn oflate. filed responses to; L87-83 36,18 NRC 45 (1983) g ALAB-738,18 NRC 177 (1983) %

!Tphes to responses to: ALAB-756,18 3RC 1340 (1983) authority to provide finaccial asustante la intervenors; LBP 83-73,18 NRC 123T (1983)

. to quuh a subpoena, Licensing Board authority to condstion denial of; L'BP43-64,18 NRC 766 concurrence in DOE siting guideliner for nuclear waste repositories, State role so; DPRM-83-3,1 (1983)

N to reopen a record, test for; ALAB438, IS NRC 177 (1983)

~

documents, applicahon ofinvestigatory records exemption to; LBP-83-40,18 NRC 93 (1983) to reopen based on construction quahty assurance deficiencieg ALA -756,18 MC 1340 (1983) obt:6: ten to provide opportunny for notice and comment on concurrence with nuclear waste in reopen where findmss have been required concernin

nienten, rePosamy maing guidehnes',M8346,18 E M M strndard for grantms; LDP-83-55,18 NRC 4l5 (1983) pohey corntmns directed ceruficaten and referral of rulings; ALAB-742,18 NRC 380 t1983 to reopen, burden on proponent of ALAB-753,18 NkC 1321 (1983I pohcy coreerning inmultaneous investigatory and adjudicatory proceedmgs on the same sub to reopen, crneria for successful. ALAB-756,18 NRC 134011983) matter; ALAB 738,18 NRC 177 (1983) to reopen, criteria to be sausfied by party seeking to raise new issue through; ALAB-753, gg NRC pohcy ima% &ccted cerukanon aml refeual d ruhgg AMBM,18 E E M 1321 (1983)

Pohcy War 4 fonnal a@cawy heanngs on c& cement amns MM M E W to reopen, supplementauon of; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1340 (1983)

IhD to tropen, test for grant of, ALAB453,18 NRC 1321 (1983) regulations governing transport of radioacuve waste; DD 83-I2,18 NRC 71) (1983) to strike entra-record matertals from a Board's 11les, need for, LBP-83-55,18 NRC 415 (1983)

NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY MOUNT ST IIELENS need for NRC to adopt particular procedures in determming concurrence with DOE siting quideline admtmon of contenuon quesuorung safety of plant in the event of ash crupuon of; LBP-8346,18 for, DPRM-83-3,18 NRC 1473 (1983)

NRC 780 (1983) 109

... - - _ ~ ~ - ~

e 6

SUBJECT INDEX SUBJECT INDEX siung guadehnes, Commisuon obhganon to provide opportunity for nonce and comruent on POLAR CR ANE alleganons of gaps in, at Comanche Peak; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 522 (1983); LBP 8340,18 NRC 67 concurrence with, CLi-83-26, II NRC 1839 (1983)

OBJECTIONS (1983) to e proposed decision, responsabihtses of a party to make; LBP-8340,18 NRC 672 (1983) at TMI-2, denial of 2.206 petioon requestmg ihas hcensee be prohibited from conducting load test OLD RIVER CUNTROL STRUCTURE on; DD-83-18,18 NRC 1296 (19833 cffect of failure of, on River Bend facility; LBP-83-52A,18 NRC 265 (1983)

POTASSIUM IODIDE NRC Sil (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT PROCEEDING need for distribution of, within Indian Pmnt 10-mile EPZ; LBP-8348,18 jurisdicuon of Licensms Board in; ALAIL739,18 NRC 335 (1983) need for inclusaon of, as protective acuan under emergency planning regulanons; ALAB 754,18 OPER ATING LICENSE PROCLEDINGS NRC 1333 (1983) consaderahon of financial quahfications in; LBP-83-37,18 NRC 52 (1983) regu atory requirements for distnbuuon of; LBP 83-71.18 NRC I105 (1983) 1 i

Lcnsms Board jurisdictor,n to decide issues relevant to special nuclear materials license raised in; POWER, OFFSITE LBP 83-38,18 NRC 68 (1983) estimanon of outage 6me in loss d. M UmeM k,,E ggp.g3 39 18 NRC 67 (1983) ongo ng, estabhshment of new Licensmg Board to conduct separate hearing in; iBP-83 42,18 NRC PRE 3UDICE disqualifying,in administrative proceedmss, source of, ALAB-748,18 NRC 1184 (1983) 112 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE (S)

See aim Bias 4firmanon of decnson converting provisional to full-scrm; ALAB-733,18 NRC 9 (1983)

PRESSURE VESSEL epphcruon, ripeness of, LBP-83-66,18 NRC 780 (1983) failure, consideration of, in Limerick protabilistic risk assessment; LBP-83a9,18 NRC 67 (1983) suthomation of, in hght of existmg deficiencies; LBP 83-77,18 NRC 1365 (1983)

)

See al3o Reactor Vessel cruse for ordering a hearing on apphcahon for; LDP A3-45,18 NRC 213 (1983) l PRESSURllED tiler MAL SilOCK NRC Bil (1983) conditions for Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) at indian Point, risk to pubhc health and safety from; LBP 8348,18 emergency preparedness criteria for issuance of; ALAB-737,18 NRC.oS (1983) findmss necessary prior to issuance of; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) l pggSog ocar River Bend Station, plans for evacuation of, durina radiological emergency; LBP-83-52A,18 health and safety standards for 6 rant of, ALAB-756,18 NRC 1340 (1983)

NRC 265 (1983) imposition of techrucal specdications on; ALAB-746,18 NRC 749 (1983)

PRIVILEGE low-power, need to resolve emergency plannans issues prior to issuance of; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 attorney-client, applicanon of, to employees of a party; CLl-83-31 18 NRC 1303 (19a3)

(1983)

,g,,

attorney-cleent, application of, to substance o mecung low power, vahdity of, pcadmg completion of hearing on catension request; CLI-83-27,18 NRC corporsuons; LBP-83-70,18 NRC 1094 (1983 1846 (1983) attorney-client, assertion of; LBP 83-53,18 stage, responsibehty of Boards and Statifor exammanon of safety issues at; ALAB-750, is NRC execuuve, for Federal Emergency Managemen Ag ncy documents, improper invocahon of; 1205 (1983) tgp-8313,18 NRC 1231 (1983)

OPERATOR ACCELERATED RETRAINING PROGRAM PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT emrasmon of penalues for failure to implement; CLi-83-20,18 NRC I (1983) for Indian Point, technical discussion ofi LBP83 68,18 NRC 811 (1983)

OPERATOR TRAINING for Limerick facihty. scope of; LBP-83 3 -

at Shwtham to maugale consequences of an ATwS, adequacy of; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) htigabahty of choice of methodology used to develop; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 (1983)

OPIN10NS PROT ECTION adyngory, by Appeal Boards; ALAB-743,18 NRC 387 (1983) against enemy attacks, design features required for; LBP-83 66,18 NRC 780 (1983)

PAINT See also Fire Protection forcMuring of, with smokms heaters at Comanche Peak facihty; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983)

PROTECTIVE COATINGS See sJuo Prosecuve Coatings at Comanche Peak, allesahons of deficiencies n quahty assurance program for; LBP-83-43,18 PLPE g32 (1983) stresses it Comanche Peak caused by cinchms up U-bolis; LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983) inspectors at Comanche Peak, Board error in conclusion about elTect of mecung on; LBP PIPE SUPPORTS NRC 1084 (1983) deficiencies in design of, at Comanche Peak; LBP 83-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983) quahty assurance of, at Comanche Peak; LBP-83-60,18 NRC 672 (1983) desenpuon of Comanche Peak iterauve design process for; LDP-83-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983)

See also Paint of A503 Steel, Comanche Peak comphance with GDC I and 4 in design of; LBP-8343,18 hRC PROTEC1tVE ORDER 759 (1983) discovery ofinformation under; LBP-83 53. IS NRC 282 (1983) use of genene sufTness values for; LBP-83-81,18 NRC I410 (1983)

Licensms Board assumption of obedience to; ALAB-735,18 NRC 19 (1983) y g g3)

PIPING smacuons for revealing informaison covered y; analysis at Shoreham, extent of, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

QUAlli'ICATION(S) of caperts who Prepare documents, litigabahty of LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1266 (1983) et Comanche Peak, allegations of cold-springing of and mimmum wall thickness violations in; for material false statements concerning; 12P-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983) of individual tea, tor operator, imposauon o civi pc SAdl2, hydrostauc testing, leak-before-break phenomenon, design hoop stress, and ASME Code ctg-83-20,18 NRC 1 (1983) 83-57 18 NRC 445 (1983) requirements for; ALAB-740,18 NRC 343 (1983) of systems important to safety at Shoreham; 68 SA-358, defects in welds on, and their repair and tesung; ALAB 740,18 NRC 343 (1983) of welds at Comanche Peak, adequacy of, LBP 8 si 18 NRC 1410 (19,13)

PLUTONIUM See also Environmental Quahficauon, Fmancial Q

-herylhum neutron sources, exclusion of, in considerms whether formula quantity of strategic special nuclear material exists; LBP-83-67,18 NRC 802 (1983)

Ile

SUBJECT INDEX (UBJECT INDEX '

g QUALITY ASSURANCE RADIOACTIVE WASTE achvines at Zammer,2.206 petanon requesung removal of apphcant from responsabihty for; high-level, denial of tnoten m postpone sh$ments of, through and to luinois; DD-43-12,18 NRC DD-83-19,18 NRC 1461 (198D Ill (1983) adequacy of Staff insp cuon and enforcement program to verify Shoreham's impicmentation of pmvinens for safe disposaI of; CLI-83-21,18 NRC 157 (1983) program for; LBP 83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

See also Nuclear Waste Repostory tt C*wnanche Peak during construction, adequacy of; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983)

RADIOGRAPillC EXAMINAT N tt P rry plant, reopening of the record on; LBP-83 52,18 NRC 256 (1983) of high-pressure unecuon nozz s; at Zammer, demal of moren to reopen the record on issues of, LBP-83-58,18 NRC 640 (1983)

RADIOlODINE commitments, not required by regulauons, need for apphcant to keep; LBP-83-74,18 NRC 1241 Pmtecuve acuans agaand, LBP-83-7I,18 NRC 1105 (1983)

(3983)

See also Potassium lodide construction, at Callaway Plant, adequacy of; ALAB-750,18 NRC 1205 (1983)

RADON construcuon, at Dsabio Canyon, adequacy of; CL1-83-27,18 NRC II46 (1983) releases, tununaten of ageHate jurisdiction over issue of; ALAB-752,18 NRC 1318 (1983) criteria, adequacy of review and physical inspection to verify Shoreham's compliance with; RATCilETINO LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) regulatory, discussion of; LBP-8343,18 NRC 759 (1983) defoencies in construchon, determming significant safety issue for purpose of reopening record on; REACTOR COOLANT S E ALAB-756,18 NRC 1340 f1983) at TMI-2, falsancati ate data for; ALAB-738, it NRC 177 (198D n of falsification of;CLl-83-24,18 NRC 315 (1983) deficiencies, significance attributed to number found, LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1365 (1983) leak rate ten data ad tube rupture at Indian Point, provimons for; LBP-8348,18 documentauon pertaming to facihty design, need for hcensee maintenance of; DD-83-II,18 NRC pressure contm ums g t

i 8N Se*

• C i S stems; Emergency Core Cochng System improper, at Limerick facility, rejecuan of contention alleging pattern of; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 REACTOR OPERATOR (3)

(1983) l of DD-83-13.18 NRC 721 (1983) interpritation of " prompt" resolution of deficiencies; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1365 (1983) at Point Bea fic8e - s n pe r 17a se tements concerning quahfications of; CLI-83 20,18 overview program at Perry for controlling safety-related contractors, descripuon of, LBP-43-77,18

""P""'"'"

{og m NRC 1365 (1983)

NRC I (198 ce a Opc Acceluated Retraining Program; Operator Training prccrrm at Midland Plant, deficiencies in implementation of; DD-8316,18 NRC 1823 (198D procrrm at Seabrook, admissibihty oflate-filed contention on adequacy of FSAR relating to; REACTOR (S)

CLI-83-23,18 NRC 311 (1983) buiMng ou,i anon, honeycombing of; ALAB-740,18 NRC 343 (1983) h ! ct6 canons on; ALAB-746,18 NRC 749 (

prcym at Shoreham for design and installation of structures, systems, and componcats, adequacy "P"*'"

Ind an P t,

scripuon of; LBP-3348,18 NRC 511 (1 D of, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

P'855"'

pro;rsm descriphon for the operation of Shoreham, adequacy of; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (198D w 11 at Corn' anche Peak, potenhal for radisuon from cracks in; LBP-83 proyam during operating stage, relanonship of, to construction quahty assurance; LBP-83-66,18 M8N NRC 780 (198D See also Pressure yemi am for replacement parts and repair work, content of FSAR concernms; ALAB-734,18 NRC E

pre

, assessment of effect of pressurized thermal shock on; LBP-8348,18 NRC 811 nd Po relevtnce of apphcant's attitude to Staff crincisms concerning; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1365 (1983) a removal of thermal sleeve P eces from; ALAB-746,18 NRC 749 (198D i

ris at Comanche Peak, investigation of alleged discouragement of; LBP-83-35,18 NRC 40 g,

c py, y,,g system for identification and correction of design deficiencies at Comanche Peak, adequacy of; RECONS R ON ou d subpoenas, denial of motion for, LBP-8344,18 LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1410 (198D of dec g

QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTORS NHC7 I (cat on issue, appenate jurisdiction over request for; ALAB 744,18 NRC 743 at Comanche Peak, harassment of; LBP 83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983); LBP-8340,18 NRC 672 (194D d '"'i""

at Comanche Peak, inumid.,pon of, and pranks played on; LBP-83-69. IS NRC 1084 (1983) 08N ciruficttion of, at Perry; LBP-83-74,18 NRC 124I (198D RECORD burden on proponent of monon to reopen; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1340 (1983)

RADIATION of; LBP43-41,18 NRC 104 (198D rir engineering safeguards to compensate for Class 9 accident release of, LBP-83-39,18 NRC

'g*

o eopen on tica e of fue

. LBP 8342,18 NRC 708 (198D monnorms, post-accident, at Limerick facility, adequacy of; LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 (1983) excepuons to s r

t e to,in evaluating admissibihty oflate intervention pensions; RADIOACTIVE RELEASES I'"

o n I

a:rborne, from Indian Point Station, risk to New York City from; LBP-8348,18 NRC 811 (1983)

• • [747,18 NRC ll67 (1983) decreases in, from shutdown ofIndian Pomt Stauon; LBP-8348,18 NRC 814 (1983)

Licensms Board jurisdiction over monon to reopen, after issuance of iniual decision; LBP-83-5 from Indian Point, slowness in nonficanon about; LBP-8348,18 NatC 811 (1983)

NRC 640 (1983) basis of party's hopes for future witnesses; LBP-83-74,18 NRC 1241 (1983) from Witerford, potential for synergism between chemical effluents of Mississippi River and; of L(e ng Board to complete; LBP-83-52,18 NRC 256 (198 ALAB-753,18 NRC 1321 (1983) potenti a for synergism between chemical effluents in Missassippi River and; LBP-83-52A,18 NRC

,g,"ngoing proceeding, supplementation of; LBP-83-48,18 N 265 (1983) reopenmg of, when initial decision has not been assued; LBP 3 18 NRC 242 (1983) routme, from capanded Catawba spent fuel storage facihty, potential for; LBP-83-56,18 NRC 421

, ght or perijes concerning supplementation ofi L ggy (198D acope of material supportmg motion to reopen; ALAB-753, I 113 132

---w- - - - - -

SUBJECT INDEX SUBJECT INZEX NRC concurrence with nuclear waste repository Suidehnes as; CLI-83-26,18 NRC 1839 (1983);

showmg necessary for reopening; LBP-83-52 18 NRC 256 (1983) less for reopenmg; ALAB-738,18 NRC I?, (1983); ALAB-750,18 NRC 1205 (1983); LBP-83 57' DPgy.83-3,18 NRC 1473 (1983)

IS NRC 445 (1983); LBP-83-58,18 NRC 640 (1983)

RULES OF PRACIICE admissbility of contenhons based on misunderstaioding or error; LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1266 (1983 undocumemed newynper articles as bases for reopenms; AL AB-753,18 NRC 1321 (1983) admissbahty of contenhons; LBP-83-52A,18 NRC 265 (1983)

RECUSAL admissibdity o' late-filed contention which has potenhal to unduly delay proceeding; LBP basis of monons for; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1184 (1983) deiermansnons of monons for, ALAB-748,18 NRC 1184 (1983) 18 NRC 1260 (1983) motion, need for umely fihns of, ALAB-751,18 NRC 1313 (1983) ameistment of Fmal Environmental Statement; LBP-83-36,18 NRC 45 (1983) amendment of imervention petiuons for change in idenaues of authontmg members of an of Lactnsing Board judge, standard for; ALAB 749,18 NRC II95 (1983)

REFERRAL OF RUIINGS or8anizauon; LBP-83-59,18 NRC 667 (1983)

Appeal Board authonty to direct certincatna of legal issues raised in pending Licenstns Bo NRC puhcy concernmg, ALAB-742,18 NRC 380 (1983) on motions for disqualification of Licensms Board Judge, need for; ALAB-749,18 NRC 1895 (1983) proceedmss; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (1983)

Appeal Board jurtsdicuon to consder reopenmg request on issue addressed in decisson that to Appect Board because of potential expense of compliance; LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983) become administratively final; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1321 (1983) to Apped Boards, Licensm8 Board practice regardms; ALAB-741, ]$ NRC 371 (1983) appellate discrenon regardmg Licensmg Board ruhngs referred to it; ALAB-74h 18 N REGULATIONS apphcation of attorney-client pnvdese to employees of a party; CLI-83 31,18 NRC 130 adrnasibehty of contemions challenging; LBP 83-76,18 NRC 1266 (1983) application of attorney-cline privilege to substance of meeting attended by one attorne interpret:non of General Design Cntenon 64, LBP-83 39,18 NRC 67 (1983) of two corporations with shared enteresss; LBP-83 70,18 NRC 1094 (1983) showmg necessary for waiver of; LBP-83-37,18 NRC 52 (1983); LBP-83-49,18 NRC 239 (1983)-

appointrnent of Interested State as lead intervenor; LBP-83-35,18 NRC 40 (1983)

LBP-83 52A,18 NRC 265 (1983) assertion of attorney-chent privilege; LBP-83-53,18 NRC 282 (1983)

REGULATORY GL' IDES assuming protective orders will be obeyed; ALAB-735,18 NRC 19 (1983) applyirs tn ASME Code secuon, Licensms Board interpretation of LDP-83-33,18 NRC 27 (1983) authonty to hold hearing in absence of valid intervenuon request LBP-83-65,18 NRC 77

^

of TMI 8, procedural history relevant to emergency preparedness for; CLI-83-22,18 NRC 299 besis of motions for disquakfacanon; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1884 (1983) burden on appeal of party seeking overturn of Licensms Board grant of late intervention; 83I RETALIATION ALAB-747,18 NRC 1167 (1983) burden on party seeking summary disposition; ALAB 75),18 NRC 1321 (1983) assinst QA/QC personnel at Zimmer; LBP-83 58,18 NRC 640 (1983) burden on proponent of monon to reopen; ALAB-738, is NRC 177 (1983); ALAB-7D,18 NRC asunst guthey assurance mspectors at Comanche Peak; LBP-83-60,18 NRC 672 (1983) or w siteNoems, elTects of, on Callaway Plant employees, ALAB 740,18 NRC 343 (1983) 1321 (1983); ALAB-756,18 NRC 1340 (1983) burden to satisfy intervention requirements; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 327 (1983) topeltte, effecuveness of pernal mitial decision for purpose of; LBP-83-77,18 NRC 1365 (1983) cause for denial of summary dasposstion; LBP-83-46,18 NRC 218 (1983) challenges to Cor..:nission regulations; LBP-83 76,18 NRC 1266 (1983) repelicte, sua sponte, scope of. AL AB-739,18 NRC 335 (1983) circumstances appropriate for discretionary interlocutory review; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 Commission dismissal of grant of, for mooiness; CLl-83-30,18 NRC 1864 (1983) discrenonzry interlocutory, circurnstances appropriate for; ALAB-737,18 NRC I68 (1983)

ALAB-742,18 NRC 380 (1983) compliance with ASME Code; LBP-83-63,18 NRC 759 (1983) capirtoon of ume for; CLI-83-32,18 NRC 1309 (1983) concepts apphed in determining an intervention peuuoner's interests; CLI-83 25, IS N mterlocutory, circumstances appropriate for; ALAB 742,18 NRC 380 (1983) of Appeal Board decision, expiration of ume for; CLl-83 28,18 NRC 1859 (1983) consideration of generie issues as subjects of contentions in contested proceedmas; LB (1983) of emergincy plannmg by FEM A, Board procedures for remedyms deficiencies in; LBP-83-60,18 N E '72 @ 83)

NRC 1266 (1983) of emergency plans, role vf FEM A in; IBP-83+1,18 NRC 700 (1983) content of appellate briefs; ALAB-740,18 NRC 343 (1983) of FSAR by Staff, hugabil.ly of adequacy of, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) content of intervention petiaans; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 327 (1983) content of opposition to directed cerufication petition; ALAB-734,18 NRC ll (1983) of mterlocutory matters, procedural vehicle for seeking; ALAB-736,18 NRC 165 (1983) cntena for a sugessful monon to reopen a record; ALAB-756,18 NRC 1340 (1983)

See also immediate EITechveness Review; independent Design Review criteria for determinmg whether in 8 tant stay pending appeal; LBP-83-40, is MRC 93 (

RICllMOND INSERT ASSEMBLIIS criteria to be satisfied by party seeking to raise new issue through monon to reopen record et Lomar;he Peak, adequacy of design of, LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983)

ALAB 753,18 NRC 1321 (1983) default for fadure to file required fmdmas; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983); LBP-83 at Inden Pom.t compared with non-nuclear nsks; LBP-8348,18 NRC 818 (1983) of turbine missdes at Perry plant; LBP-83-46,18 NRC 218 (1981) degree of paruculartly required in untimely imervention petitions; ALAS 747, 672 (1983) to pubhc health amt safety from fuel loadms and pre-cnticalstr testmg, CLI-83-27,18 NRC 1146 degree of specificity required for contentions; LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1266 (198L (1983) from senous accidents at Indian Point; LBP-83-68,18 NRC 811 (1983) demonstration of bias from extrqudicial sources; ALAB-749 ROAM compnser3 Indian Pomt evacuation routes, adequacy of; LBP-8348,18 NRC 83 I (1983)

ROCK 0% ERBREAK denial of nontirnely petinons to intervene where other means to protect petitioner's in essent of, at Comanche Peak facahty; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983); LBP-8340,18 NRC 672 exist; LBP 83-42,18 NRC 112 (1983) determinauons of motions for disqualification; ALAB 748,18 NRC 3 384 (1983)

U 83I determinmg a sigmficant safety issue for purpose of reopening motions based on c RUL E M AKING genenc, effect of, on mdividual proceedms; CLI-83-21,18 NRC 157 (l983) assurance deficiencits; ALAB-756, is NRC 1340 (1983) discovery asams FEM A; LBP-83-61,18 NRC 700 (1983) 114 115

.2 7

SUBJECT INDEX

' SUBJECT IMLEX ve der;I BP 83 53, la NRC 282 (19831 referral of ruling to Appeal Board because of potential expense of complianc*; LBP-83-81.18 NRC '

e dn ;

8 8

generic rulemakms on individual proceedms; CLI-83 21,18 NRC 157 (1983) is of mohons for disqualdicahon{ ALAB-749,18 NRC 1195'(1983) s referrals

LBP 83 38,18 NRC 61 (1983) relation of nontimely intervention petitions to 2.206 petition; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1867 (1983) -

s 15 q n est-blishment da v r dead nes; 83 9,18 NRC 14JO (1983) renohcing an opportunity for a hearing; LBP-83-73,18 NRC 1238 (1983) emiephon to rule that d

,I H 4( SD reopen ng e pmceedings when entire reemd has not closed and inM dech has not Wn W extent to whnh petsuo ess 10 C F'R' 2' 4 )

8 intervenhon; ALAB-743,18 NRC 387 (1983) repening the remd; N-SMI,18 NRC 104 (1983) factors balanced for ad 83);

rephes to another pan /s answer to a nwth WM, H E d M CLI-83-25,18 NRC 19 3) respons Inhsies of counsel citing legal authority to a Board; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1167 (1983) rugors considered in grant of discretionary intervention; CLI-83-25,18 NRC 327 (1983) responsibehties of parties concerning appellate briefs; ALAB-739,18 NRC 335 (1983) actors Sovernmg acceptance oflate-filed antervention petshons; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1867 (1983) responsibdatics of parties in oppoems directed cerhncation pehhon; ALAB-741,18 NRC 371 (1983) i rating license applicahon as cause for r

behues of ties to bring signincant new information to the Board's attention; ALAB-738, dering a

LB -83 l8 NR 98 use for late Ghns of contenhons; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (1983); LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 responsibilities of perhes to make specinc objections to a proposed decision; LBP-83-60,18 NB.C s

672 (1983) ho ng q

! sy assurance record on a party's hopes of obtaming future witnesses; LBP-83-74, responsibilities of parties to submit relevant new information to an Appeal Board; ALAB 750,18 NRC 1205 (1983) importance given to ability to contribute to sound record in conudering admissabehty of late right of counsel to approach witnesses for an opposing party; CLI-83-3e,18 NRC 1303 (1983) intrrvenhon petihon; ALAB-747,18 NRC ll67 (1983) right of party to make new arguments in findings of fact; LSP-83-81.14 NRC 1410 (1983) instituhon of show cause proceedmss; ALAB-750,18 NRC 1205 (1983) sanctions for revenhng information covered by protective order; LBP-83-64,18 NRC 766 (1983) hon of execuhve privilege by Federal Emergency Management Agency; i BP-83 73,18 NRC scope of material supporting mohon to reopen record; ALAb-75),18 NRC 1321 (1983) en scope of questions asked on deposition; LBP 83-64,18 NRC 766 (1983) issuance of proposed inshal decision; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983) scope of sua sponte authority of Licensing Boards; LbP-83-69,18 NRC 1984 (1983)

Juri at on special nuclear materials hcense in operating hcense proceedms; LBP-83-38,18 showing necessary for innerlocutory appellate review of Licensing Board ruhnss; ALAB-734,18 NRC 11 (1983); ALAB-735,18 NRC 19 (1983) justdication for directed cerhGcation; ALAB-741,18 NRC 373 (1933) simwing necessary for reopening the record; LBP-83 52,18 NRC 256 (1983)

Ltle 61 of contentions based on previously unavailable, heensing-related documents; LBP-83-39*

showing necessary for waiver of Commission regulations; L&P-83-49,18 NKC 239 (1983) 8N showing necessary for waiver of financial quahlications regulations; LBP-83-52A,18 NRC 265 Lice Board authoraty to condition denial of mohon to quash a subpoena; LBP-83-64,18 NRC (1983) showing necessary in absence of ood cause for tardiness in seeking intervention; ALAB-743,18 S

g ice Board discrenon in grant oflate-Gled entervention petitions; ALAB-747,18 NRC 1167 NRC 387 (1983)*

source of disquahrying bias; ALAB-751,18 NRC 1333 (1983) t e pi re matters not embraced by notice of opportunity of hearing; standard for disquahfication; ALAB-749,18 NRC 1895 (1983)

B 3

'8 PC 3983I standard for granting a motion to reopen when Gndings have been required concerning an aspect of gicensing Board pursuit of defaulted issues; LBP-8349,18 NRC 1984 (1983) an admitted contenuon; LBP 83-55,18 NRC 415 (1983) acensms BoarJ pursuit of sua sponte issues; LBP-83-75,18 NRC 1254 (1983) standing of an organization to intervene where identity of authorizing member changes; LBP-83-59, amitzd appearance statements; CLI-83 25,18 NRC 327 (1983) 18 NRC 667 (1983) htig ty of quahGcanons of experts who prepare documents; LBP-83 76,18 NRC 1266 (1983) supplementation of the record of ongoing proceedmg with unsnhcited lihngs; LSP 83-48,18 NRC Imring on comphance with Board order; LBa*-83-44,18 NRC 201 (1983) 236 (1983) nee need for imposnion of sanchons for failure to give intervenor advance notice of applicant-Stati test for reopening a record; ALAB-738,18 NRC 177 (1983); ALAB 750, IS NRC 1205 (1983);

techmcal meetings; LBP-83 73,18 NRC 1231 (1983)

ALAB-753,18 NRC 1321 (1983) need to strike estra-record materials from a Board's Gles; LBP-83 55,18 NRC 415 (1983J time hmit for fihns contentions; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (1983) imely submission of contenuons; LBP-83-37,18 NRC 52 (19839; LBP-33-58,18 NRC 640 types of appeals which are inscriocutory; ALAB-736,18 NRC 165 (1983) no undocumented newspaper articles as bases for reopening a record; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1321 (1983) obission of parties to inform Boards of signiGcant new developments bearing on decisions on a use of officially noticeable material; ALAB 740,18 NRC 343 (1983)

Foceedmg; ALAB-752,18 NRC 1318 (1983) waiver of attorney-client privilege; LBP-83-70,18 NRC 1994 (1983) pennons not properly brought under 30 C.F.R. 2.206; DD-83-II,18 NRC 293 (19838 waiver of Commission regulations governing Gnancial quahncanons review; LBP-83-37,18 NRC 52 pleadmg requirements for intervention petitions; LBP-83-59,18 NRC 667 (1983)

(1983) potential for future hugauon as argument for directed cernfication; ALAB-737,18 NRC 168 (1983) weight given to 10 C.F.R. 2.714(a)(1)(v) in balancing process for late intervenuon; ALAB-743,18 potentir1 of Licensing Board error for expense and delay as cause for interlocutory review-NRC 387 (1983)

ALAB-741,18 NRC 378 (1983) weight given to late intervenuon petition's poiential for delaying a proceedms; ALAB-747,18 NRC procedural vehi le for seeking review ofinterlocutory matters, ALAB-736,18 NRC 165 (1983) 1867 (1983)

NRC records and documents; LBP 83-40,18 NRC 93 (1983); LBP-33-51,18 NRC source of disquahfying bias or prejudice in administrative proceedings; ALAB-748,18 NRC 1884 p

tion (1983); ALAB-749,18 NRC 1895 (1983) purpose of Pmird adoptum of schedule for discovery; LBP-83-80,18 NEC r404 (1983)

Purposes of be.sas-for contenhon requirement; LBP-83-76,18 NRC 1266 (1983) 116 387 s

I e

a SUBJECT INDEX SUBJECT INDEX SAU)TAGE

^

of UCLA research reactor, need to protect against; LBP-8347, IS NRC 802 0983)

L 3

8N C6 i8 of from risk assessments for Indian Pomt LBP-83-68,18 NRC 8110983) necesuty for preparation of environmental impact statement for; LBP-33-38,18 NRC 610983) 1 8"*"k I'C5881y.

SPECIAL PROCEEDING NRC til 0983) engsneerms, to -smpenute for Clan 9 accident release of anterne adequacy of, LBP-83-39,18 NRC 67 0983) not on the record," Comnussion guidance on conduct of; LBP4348,18 for transport of spent fuel,jurisdwtson over, DD 83 84' I8 NRC 726 0933I SPENT FUEL SAFEGUARDS INFORM ATION

'" " ***' N "'*I ""I '" "*"#'*

""58*wiluness of parues to NRC proceedmss with, LBP-83-40,18 NRC 93 0983) legal authorny for transportanon of DD-83-14,18 NRC 726 0983) prsmns fw aM Gnancing &c esposal d WM, u N M M

. ETY I'ndmss req,nred for operation of a nuclear power plant; AL AB-740,18 NRC 343 (

'*"""8 test ng, and quahey assurance of casks for transport and storage of, DD-83-12,18 NRC 713 i

amprovement, at Indian Point resultms from measures reqmred by NRC; LBP 834, I8 NRC 811 transportation between Surry and North Anna faciliues:, Lacensing Board authonty to conuder; 0983) i marginu of, in structural dessns, LBP-8343,18 NRC 759 (1983)

}

ALAB 741,18 NRC 3710983)

SPENT FUEL POOL See also Final Safety Analyss Report; llealth and Safety at Catawba, possibehty of cask drop into; LBP-83-56,18 NRC 4210981)

SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT at Catamba, potential for cruicahty in; LBP-83-56,18 NRC 4210983) fcr transport of spent fuel, need for; DD-83-34, IS NRC 726 (193'.)

at Catawba, potential for increased routine radioactive releases from; LBP-33-56,18 NRC 421 Ses aim Final Safety Evaluauon Report S AFETY ISSUES 0983) at Catawba, potentaal for severe, c i ni m; LBP-83-56,18 NRC 42109833. tit ch usnaficant, for reopenmg nmuons based on construcuan 4"'1"' ""'*"'8 d*f'C'encies; ALAB 756*

18 NRC I340 09 3) compliance of Big Rock W >

unwruested generic unresolked, degree of Board scruuny of, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 0983) cochr.s system at Catawba, adequacy of; LBP-83 56,18 NRC 423 0983) unre_olved, water hammer as, LBP-83 57,18 NRC 445 0983)

S,,,i3, p,,i poog SAFETY SYSTEMS at Big Rock Pomt, sausfacuon of emergency planning reqmrements for; LBP-83-44,18 NR ta S r ham, apphcaten of proper systemauc methodology to analyze rehabihty of; LBP-83-57,18 0983)

U983I tt Shoreham, clasuracaten and quahfication of, LBP-83 57,18 NRC 445 0983) need for formal construction permit amendment for; LBP-83-56,18 NRC 4210933)

SPOTTED TURTLE (Clemmys guttata) e rim Equipment, Safety Retated effect of Perry transmisuon hne mamtenance procedures on; DD-83-17,18 NRC 1289 (1983)

SANCTIONS SPRAY SYSTEMS asa rty for taking legal pusuion a Board thmks is wrong, impropnety of, LBP 81-56,18 NRC fw dry well and suppumon chamber, at Shwehant, incamument oMow sates to mmHw for falurs to give antervenor advance nouce of apphcant-Staff technical meeugs, need fw operation of, LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 0983) impostion ofi LBP-83-73,18 NRC 12310983) adeg sacy of Shoreham control room instruments to monnor flow of; LBP 83-57,18 NR for material false statement in licenung appiscauon, impoution of DD-83-17,18 NRC 1289 0983I for reveshng information covered by protecuve order; LBP-8344,13 NRC 766 0983)

STANDING of an organizaten to intervene where identdy of authorians member changes; LBP 83 5 guaJance to Boards on applicahon of, CL1-83-23,18 NRC 1859 0983) 667 M83)

SCHLDULE of persons seeking to intervene, precedents governms; LBP-8345,18 NRC 774 0983) for dacovery, purpose of Board adopuon of, LBP 83 80,18 NRC I404189g33 to intervene, showmg required to establish; CLl-83-25,18 NRC 327 0983)

SCllEDULING sng i isht d aspenen of construction, LBP 83-66, is NRC 780 0983)

STATUTORY CONCURRENCE provisions, survey of, CLI-83-26,18 NRC 1139 0983)

SE IC DESIGN at Shweham, adequacy of, LBP-33-57,18 NRC 445 09st3)

STAY llELTERING of civil proceedings parallehng criminal proceedings, circumstances appropriate for; CL 18 T/PPSS, admimon of contenten allegms defects in; LDP-8346,18 NRC 780 0983)

NKC 315 0983) pending appeal, cracria for determmms whether to grant; LBP-83-40,18 NRC 93 0983) durms radiological emergency at Indian Pmnt, elTicacy of, LBP-8348, i8 MC 80 M83)

STEAM GENER ATOR SllOW CAUSE PROCEEDINGS once through, sensiuvny of, to secondary ude pertubanona, LBP 8346,18 NRC 780 0983) reamn Tw msutuuon of. ALAB-750,18 NRC 1205 0983) requirements at Indian Pomt, essent of hcensee con phance wuh, LBP 8348,18 NRC SilOTDOWN STEAM GENERATOR TUBE (S) of Indsan Pomt, etTests of; LBP-8348,18 NRC Sil 0983) cracking, leak before break phenomenon in ALAB-739,18 NRC 335 0983)

SINGLE FAILURE CRITERlON degraJauon at Point Beach, potential for; DD-8313. IS NRC 7210983) appheaten of, to Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 0983) degraded, stabihiauon and momtorms of, at indsan Poma; LBP-83-68,18 NRC 8110983)

SOILS SETTLEMENT contamment cracks caused by; LBP-83-50,18 NRC 242 0983) failure, ungle and multiple. ALAB 739,18 NRC 335 0983) repair at Point Beach by sleeving; ALAB-739,18 NRC 335 0983) upan at hee h M Und I, ruWs on mHem WW WW 4 NM M P'oblems at MidlanJ Plant, need for StafT reuew of rewauuon of DD-83-16* Ig NRC ll23 @83I SPECIAL NUCLEAR M ATERIAL on hand et UCLA's Nuclear Energy Laborat ty, amount of, L BP-8347,18 NRC 303 Ig9g33 NRC L266 0983)

See tiso Strategic special Nuclear M4;enals 119 IIS

a e

o SUBJECT INDEX SUBJECT INDEX STEEL CE, change m matenal propernes for; LBP-83-63 IS NRC 759 (1983)

TESTIMONY accident consequence and probabihty at Indian Point, scope of, LBP-8348,18 NRC $ll (1983) severe winter, accounung for, in Indian Point offsete emergency plans; LBP-f 3-68,18 NRC 811 i ESTING N

hot functional, inadmiswbehty of late-rded con enuon on; LBP 83-75 A,18 NRC 1260 (1983)

STR ATEGIC SPECIAL NUCLEAR M ATERIAL hydrostatic, of SA-312 piping at Callaway Plant; ALAB-740,18 NRC 343 (1983) formula quant 6ty, exemption of plutonsum-berythum neutron sources in determining existence of'-

integrated hot funcuonal, at Byron stauon, technical discussion of, LBP-83-41,18 NRC 104 (1983)

LBP-83-67 18 NRC 802 (1983) load on TMI-2 polar crane, denial of 2.206 peuuon requestmg that hcensee be prohituted from; 7

See also Special Nuclear Matenal; Special Nucleas Materials License DD-R3-18,18 NRC 1296 (1983)

SUA SPONTE ISSUES af passive mechanical valves at Shoreham; Lbi'-g;17,18 NRC 445 (1983) circumstances inappropriate for Board pursuit of LBP-83-75,18 NRC 1254 (1983) pre-crincanny, nsk to pubhc heahh and safety from; CLI-83-27,18 NRC 1846 (1983)

Licensms Board authority to adopt, LBP-83-69,18 NRC 1084 (1983) program, experimental design, of Mark Il contamment structure at Shoreham, adequacy of, reasons for Board adoption of contenuons as; LBP-83-58,18 Nhc 64') (1983)

LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) uncontested generic unresolved safety issues raised as; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) somscopic, for honeycombmg of Callaway reactor building foundation; ALAB 740,18 NRC 343 SUBPOENA (S)

g39g3, Licensang Board authority to condiuon denial of monon to quash; LBP-83 64,18 NRC 766 (1983) of permns to tesury or appear and produce documents concernmg falurication of leak rate test data steam bypass, at Shoreham, la determine leakage rate between wetwell and drywell, adequacy of, i

LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983) at TMI-2, denaal of monon to quash; Cil-83-24. IS NRC 315 (1983) ultrasonic, of turbines; LBP-83 46,18 NAC 218 !1983) return of, in District where mdividual resides; CLI-83-24,18 NRC 315 (1983)

See also Eddy current Testing SULFUR THERMAL STRESS

-mduced intergranular stress corrowan cracking at TMI-1, lithium inhatution of; LBP-83-76,18 NRC withm pif,a supports under LOCA conditions, need for o sideration of; LBP-83 33,1 1266 (1983) 4g9g3 SUMM ARY DISPOSITION TORNADO burdelt on party seeking; ALAB-753,18 NRC 1321 (1983) vulnerability of Indian' Point to; LBP-83-68,18 NRC Sil (1983) ctuse for demal of, LBP-83-46,18 NRC 218 (1983)

TRAINING of contrntion addressms potential for crincahty of Catawba spent fuel pool, denial of monon for.

of control room operators on simulators, need for Board to raiss sua sponte issue of, LBP-83-75,18 LBP-83-56. IS NRC 421 (1983)

NRC 1254 (1983) of contention addressing potenual for increased routine radioactive releases from expanded spent radiological emergency response, at Indian Point, adequacy r,f; LBP-83-68,18 NRC 811 (1983) fuel pool, grant of motion for; LBP 83-56,18 NRC 421 (1983) radiological, of Big Rock Point area local anJ school omcials, adequacy of; LBP-83-44,18 NRC 201 of conention addressms potential for sesere accident in Catawba spent fuel storage facihty* grant of II983I motion for; LBP-83-56,18 NRC 421 (1983)

See also Operator Accelerated Retraining Program, Operator Training of continuon postulating cask drop accident at Catawba, grant of motion for; LBP-83-56* IS NRC TRANSMISSION LINE 42I (1983) maintenance procedures at Perry, elTect of, on spotted turtles; DD-83-17,18 NRC 1289 (1983) of contention quesnoning adequacy of Catawba spent fuel pool cooling systems, denial of monon TRANSPORTATION for; LBP-83 56,18 NRC 428 (1983) of high-level radioactive waste through and to Illinois, denial of motion to pqstpone; DD 8312.18 of contenuon questionmg safety of procedures for handimg fuct at Catawba, grant of motion for.

NRC /13 (1983)

LBP-83-56,18 NRC 421 (1983) of spent fuel, legal authority for; DD-8314,18 NRC 726 (1983)

SUSPENSION See also Department of Transportauon of construchon, scheduhng of proceedmss in light of; LBP-83-66,18 NPC 780 (1983)

TURBINES of Dvbio Canyon hoense authorizing fuel loading and pre crincahty testing, hfung of; CLI-83 27,18 General Electric nuclear, safety of; LBP 83-46,18 NRC 218 (1983)

NRC l146 (1983) nspection and maintenance of, to prevent missiles; LBP-83-46,18 NRC 218 (1983)

SYNERGISM UPPER LATERAL RESTR AINT BEAM between radauacuve releases from Waterford and chemical emuents oflower Mississippi River-at Comanche Peak, free-end displacement of; LBP-83-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983)

ALAB-753,18 NRC 1321 (1983); LBP-83-52A,18 NRC 265 (1983)

VALVES SYSTEMS INTER ACTION containment isolatioe, modifications to, at Indian Point; LBP-83-68,18 NRC til (1983) adequacy of analysis of, at Shoreham; LBP-83 57, ils NRC 445 (1983) passive mechanical, o Shoreham, possibihty of fadure of; LBP-83-:i7,18 NRC 445 (1983) melusion of, in accident sequences postulated for design basis of Shoreham; LBP-83-57,18 NRC safety rehef, at Shoreham, tests of, and reduchon of chattenses so; LBP-83-57.18 NRC 445 (1983) 445 (1983) safety relief, examinanon of act-point drift relauve to; LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

TECliNICA L SPLCitICATIONS VIOLATlONS circumstances appropriate for imposition of; ALAB-746,18 NRC 749 (1983) continuing, interpretation of, CLI-83-20,18 NRC I (1983) mcorporanon of surveillance program for Waterford foundauon mat into; ALAB 753,18 NRC 1321 See also Mouce of Violation (19833 NRC categorizauon of; DD-83-17,18 NRC 1289 (1983)

TERMINATION quality assurance, significance of; LBP-83 77,18 NRC 1365 (1983) of appellate jurisdicuon followmg facihty's cancellauon; ALAB-752,18 NRC 1318 (1983)

WAlVER of construction permit proceedmss; LBP-83-78,18 NRC 1398 (1983) of attorney-chent pnvilege; LBP 83 70,18 NRC 1094 (1983) of proceedmg in absence of vahd intervenhon request; LBP-83-65,18 NRC 774 (1983) of Cmntmssaon regulations governing financial quahficauons review; LBP-83 37,18 NRC 52 (1983) of retamed jurisdiction over radon assue; ALAB.745,18 NRC 746 (1983) of Commissson regulanons, showmg necessary for; LBP-83-49,18 NRC 239 (1983)

See also Exemption 120 Ill w.

~L - - -

f e

e SUBJECT INDEX WATER Stops at Comanche Peak, desenpason of and allegatm'ns a(improper mstallation of, LBP-33-43,18 NRC 122 (1983)

WATER llAMMER at Shoreham, prevenson and rnstegaten of LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

% ELD (S)

FACILITY INDEX 88 C***nche Peak, adequacy o(quahGcation of, LBP-33-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983) plus, repast of, at Comanche Peak, LBP-83-60,18 NRC 672 (1983); LBP-83-69,18 NRC 1084 (1983) rod control at Comanche Peak adequacy of; LBP-83-60,18 NRC 672 (1983)

W EL DING BIG ROCK POINT PLANT; Docket No. 50-155 at Comanche Peak, allegatons of irr. proper practices m; L BP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983)

SPENT FUEL POOL AMENDMENT; August 1,1983; SUPPLEMENTARY INITIAL at Shoreham, volation of. LBP-83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983)

DECISION; LBP-83-44,18 NRC 201 (1983) deGciencies as Comanche Peak; LBP-83 60,18 NRC 672 (1983)

SPENT FUEL POOL AMbNDMENT; August 15,1983; MEMOR ANDUM; LBP-8344 A,18 deficiencies m pepmg subassembhes at Callamay Ptarit; ALAB-740, IS NRC 343 (1983)

NRC 218 (1983) domnhdl, at Coinanche Peak, weight given to appheant testimony on; E BP-83-69,18 NRC 1084 SPENT FUI L POOL AMENDMENT; September 30,1983, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; (1983) ggp_83-62,18 NRC 708 (1983) of studs so errb-dded plates at Callaway Plant, adequacy of, ALAB-740,18 NRC 343 (1983)

BYRON NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Units I and 2; Docket Nos. STN 50-454-OL, STN messe and downhill, at Comanche Peak. mvestigaton of; L BP83-35,18 NRC 40 (1983) 50-455-OL ( ASLBP No. 79-415-04-PE)

See sha Amencan Weidms Society Ciale OPERATING LICENSE; July 26,1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING STAY

%ITilDR AW Al APPLICATION; LBP-8340,18 NRC 93 (1983) of apphcatmn for constru ison per;nis granted m thout prejudice: LBP-83-78,18 NRC 1398 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE, July 27,1983, MEMORANDUM 4ND ORDI.R; ALAB-135,18 NRC

%ll NI SS 59 (g933) tharacter, demeanms of, IBP-83-69,18 NRC 1084 (1983)

Ot'ER ATING LICENSE; July 28,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING INTERVENORS' MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT Tile QA/QC RECORD; LBP-83-41,18 NRC 7 espert. *caght smn to unwpported crismeermg judgment by;I BP-83-81,18 NRC 1410 (1983) future. need to hold open quahey assurance retord on basis of parly's hope for; LBP-83 74,18 NRC 704 (1983) 324I U'"38 OPER ATING LICENSE; August 17,1983; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-83-51,18

[

math crimmal secord, meight gives. to testenwny by; L BP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983); L BP-83-60,18 NRC 253 (1983) m 672 09836 CALLAW AY PLANT, Unit I; Docket No. STN 50-483OL i

OPERATING LICENSE; September 14, 1983; DECISION; ALAB-740,18 NRC 343 (1983)

OPER ATING LICENSE; October 31,1983; INITIAL DECISION; LBP-33-71,18 NRC 1105 (1983)

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION, Units I and 2, Docket Nos. 50-413OL,50-414-OL ( ASLBP No.

814634)!-OL)

OPERATING LICENSE; September 6,1983; MEMOR ANDUM AND Olt DER; LBP-83-56,18 NRC 421 (1983)

CllEROKEE NUCLEAR STATION, Umts I,2 and 3; Docket Nos. STN 50-491, STN 50-492, STN 50-493 CONSTRUCllON PERMIT; October 12,1983 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB 745, 18 NRC 746 (1983)

COM ANCilE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, Units I and 2; Docket Nos-50-445, 50-446

( ASLBP No. 79 430-060)

OPER ATING LICENSE; July 6,1983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBF-83-33,18 NRC 27 (1983); LBP-83-34,18 NRC 36 (1983); LBP-83 35,18 NRC 40 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; July 29,1983, PROPOSED INITIAL DECISION; LBP-83-43,18 NRC 122 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; August 15,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-83-48,18 NRC 236 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; August 19, 1983; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R.

( 2.206; DD-83 II,18 NRC 293 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; September I,1983; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; LbP-83-55,18 NRC 415 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; September 23,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-83-60,18 NRC 672 (1983)

OPER ATING LICENSE; October 6,1983; PARTI AL INITIAL DECISION; LBP-83-63,18 NRC 759 (1983)

I 113

i O

l'ACILITY INDEX FACILITY INDEX OPER ATING LICFNSE; October 25,1983, MEklORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-83-69,18 POINT BEAtal NUCLEAR PLANT, Umts I and 2; Docket Nos. 50-266, 50-301 NRC 1084 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; September 23, 1983. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R.

ENERGY SYSTEMS GROUP,Ihket Na 70-25 ( ASLBP No-83-48841 ML)

{ 2.206; DD-83-13,18 NRC 721 (1983)

SPECIAL NUCLEAR M ATERIALS LICENSE RENEWAL; October 7,1983, POINT BEACll NUCLEAR PLANT, Umts I and 2; Docket Nos. 50-266-OLA,50-301-OLA MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 83-65,18 NRC 774 (198D OPEAATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; September 7,1983; DECISION; ALAB-739,18 NRC INDI AN POINT, Uma 2. Dahet Nos. 50-247-SP,50 286-SP ( ASLBP No-81 -466-03,SP) 33f (1983)

SPECIAL PROCEEDING; October 24,1983 RECOMMENDATIONS TO Tile COMMISSION; R ANCilO SLCO NUCLEAR GENER ATING STATION; Docket No. 50-312-SP LBP-83-68,18 NRC Bil (198D SPLCIAL PROCEEDING; October 24,1983; DECislON; ALAB 746,18 NRC 749 (1983)

INDIAN POINT, Uma 3. Dasket Nos. 50-247 SP,50-286 SP ( ASLBP No. 81-46643-SP)

RIVER BEND STATION, Umts I and 2; Docket Nos-50-4584L,50-459-OL (ASLBP No.

SPECIAL PROCEEDING Ontober 24,1983, RFCOMMENDATIONS TO TIIE COMMISSION; 82-46848-OL)

LBP-83-68, is NRC 811 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; Augma 26,1983; MEMORANDUM; LB683 52A,18 NRC 265 (1983)

LA CROSSE BOILING W ATER REACTOR; Docket No. 50-409 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GEFERATING STATION, Umts 2 and 3; Docket Nos. 50-M14L.

OPERATING LICENSE; July ll,1983. DECISION, ALAB-733,18 NRC 9 (198D 50-3624)L (ASLBP No. 78-365-01-OL)

LIMERICK GENE RATING STATION, Umts I and 2, Docket Nos. 50-3524)L, 50-3534)L OPERATING LICENSE; August 12, 1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORCER; LBP-83-47,18 OPERATING LICENSE; July 26,1983 SECOND SPECIAL PREllEARING CONFERENCE NRC 228 (1983) j ORDER, LBP-8139,18 NRC 67 II983)

SEABROOK STATION, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 50-4434L, 50-4444)L MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER STATION, Docket No. 50-309 OPERATING LICENSE; July 19,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB 734,18 NRC EMERGENCY PLANNING, September 30,1983; INTERIM DIRECTOR'S DECISION ll (1983)

UNDER 10 C F R. ) 2.206, DD-83-15,18 NRC 738 (198D OPERATING LICENSE; August 26,1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-737,18 ilNANCIAL QUALIFICATIONS; August 2,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; NRC 168 (1983)

Cll-83-21,18 NRC 157 (1983)

SPECIAL PROCEEDING; September 19, 1983;MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; CLI-83-23, MIDLAND PLANT, Uuts I and 2; Docket Nos. 50-329, 50-330 18 NRC 318 (198D MODitICATION ORDLR AND OPER ATING LICENSE, October 6,1983, DIRECTOR'S SilOREll AM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Unit l; Docket No 50-3224)L DECISION UNDFR 10 C F R 2 206. I)D-83-16,18 NRC 1823 (1983)

OPERATING LICENSE; September 28,1983; PARTIAL INITIAL DECISION; LBP-83-57,18 MIDLAND PLANT, Umts I and 2; Daket Nos. 50-3290M&OL,50-330-OMAOL ( ASLBP Nos.

NRC 445 (1983) 78-389434)L,80-42942 SP)

SilOREll AM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Unit I; Docket No. 50-3224L-3 MODIFICATION ORDER AND OPERATING LICENSE; August 17,1983; M EMOR ANDUM EMERGENCY PLANNING; July 28,1983-. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING AND ORDER, LBP-83-50,18 NRC 242 (198D FETITION TO INTERVENE OF CITllENS FOR AN ORDERLY ENERGY POLICY,INC; MODIFICATION ORDER AND OPERATING LICENSE; August 31,1983; MEMORANDUM LBP-83 42,18 NRC 112 (1983)

AND ORDER LBP-83 53,18 NRC 282 (19836 EMERGENCY PLANNING; September 27,1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MODIFICATION ORDER AND OPER ATING LICENSE; October 6,1983; MEMOR ANDUM SUFFOLK COUNTY MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM FEM A; LBP-83-61,18 AND ORDER, LBP-83-64,18 NRC 766 (198D NRC 700 (19BD MODIFICATION ORDER AND OPER ATING LICENSE; October 28,1983; MEMOR ANDUM EMERGENCY PLANNING; September 29,1983, DECISION; ALAB-743,18 NRC 387 (1983)

AND ORDER LBP-83-70,18 NRC 1094 (198D SOUTil TEX AS PROJLCT, Uruis I and 2 Dothet Nos STN 50-498-OL, STN 50-4994)L (ASLBP NINE MIL E POINT NUCLEAR STATION, Uma 2, Docket No. 50-410-OL ( ASLBP No.

No. 79-42147-OL 3

33-484 03-OL)

OPERATING LICENSE; July 14,1983; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-83-37,18 NRC OPERATING LICENSE PROCEEDING; August 4,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; 52 (198D LBP-83-45,18 NRC 21) (198D OPERATING LICENSE, Augma 16,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-83-49,18 j

NO2Til ANNA POWER STATION, Umts I and 2; Docket Not 50-338-OLA 1,50-339-OLA-l NRC 239 (1983)

OPER ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; September 15,1983, MEMORANDUM AND TilREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, Uma I; Docket No. 50 289-SP ORDER, AL AB 741,18 NRC 378 (198D RLSTART; September 21, 1983; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; CLl-83-25,18 NRC 327 PALO VE RDE NUCLEAR GENER ATING STATION, Umts 2 and 3; Ducket Nos. STN 56-529-OL, (198D STN 50-530-OL ( ASLBP No. 80-44741-OL)

RESTART; September 8,1983, DLCislON; CLI.83-22,18 NRC 299 (1983)

OPE R ATING LICENSE, July ll,1983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-83-36,18 NRC TIIREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, Uma I; Docket No. 50-289-SP (Design issues) 45 (198D SPECIAL PROCEEDING; October 6,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-744,18 OPERATING LICENSE; September 19,1981, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-742,18 NRC 743 (198D hRC 380 (198D TilREE MILE ISLAND NUCL EAR STATION, Umt I; Docket No. 50-289-SP (Management Phase)

PERRY NUCLE kR POWER PLANT. Unus I and 2 Dothet Nos 50-440-OL,50 441-OL SPECIAL PROCEEDING; August 31,1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-738,18 OPERATING LICENSE; July 12,1983, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-83-38, IS NRC NRC 177 (198D tl (198D TilREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, Unit 2; Docket No. 50-320 OPER ATING LICENSE; Ausma 9,1983, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-83-46,18 SPECI AL PROCLEDING; September 21,1983, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; CLI-83 24, NRC 218 (198D 18 NRC 315 (198D OPEl(ATING LICENSE, Auger 18,1983, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDEk; LBP-83-52,18, TilRE E MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, Units I and 2; Docket Nos 50-289, 50-320 NRC 256 (198D CIVIL PEN ALTY; July 22,1983; STATEMENT OF Tile COMMISSION; CLI-83-20,18 NRC I OPER ATING LICENSE; Auget 24,1983. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-7M,18 (198D NRC 365 (198D 124 125 f

0 0

FACILITY INDEX l

UCLA RESEARCH REACTOR Dockes Na 54142-OL ( ASLBP ha 30-444-034M.) -

OPERATING LICENSE RENEWAL; October 24,1993; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER;

. LDP 83-67.18 NRC 302 (1983)

WILLIAM H. ZIMMER NLK1 EAR POWER STATION. Uma I; Doches No. 50-3584M. ( AStar -

Na M-317-Ol4)L) l OPERATING LICENSE; September IS,1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LSP-83-58,18 l

NRC 64J (1983)

-A.'

l WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 3; Doches Na 50-440-CPA (ASLDP Na 83-485-02<PA) l CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; Sepeesnher 21,1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; I

LSP-83-59. IS NRC 667 (1983)

WPPSS NUCLEAR PROKCT NO. I; Docket Na 50-4044. ( ASLSP No. 82-479464)L)

OPERATING LICENSE; October 14,1983; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LSP-8346,18 NRC 780 (1983) i-l l

IM

,