ML20091J281

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Amend 77 to License NPF-43,revising Pressure/Temp Curves in Ts,Per Rev 2 to Reg Guide 1.99
ML20091J281
Person / Time
Site: Fermi 
Issue date: 12/27/1991
From: Marsh L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20091J284 List:
References
RTR-REGGD-01.099, RTR-REGGD-1.099 NUDOCS 9201100251
Download: ML20091J281 (14)


Text

.. -_.

s M8sg fl k

UNITc0 sTATcs sm'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s

W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 o

s

%,,,,,[

DETROIT EDISON COMPANY

.F ERM1-2 DOCKET NO. 50-341 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 77 License No. NPF-43 1.

The Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the Commission) has found that:

A.

The application for amendment by the Detroit Edison Company (the licensee)datedFebruary 21, 1991, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act),

ar.d the Comission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.

The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Corrnission; C.

There is reasonable assurance (1) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Comission's regulations; D.

The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and l

E.

The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Comission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to 'he Technica1' Specifica-tions as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of racility Operating License No. NPF-43 is hereby amended to read as follows:

L Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 77, and the Environmental Protection Plan contaired in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license. Deco shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

n o t t oo:m :i cs P I,R ADOD'G5000M1 P

Fre

~.

i-2 3.

This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

'%>r,+.dk%n y

L. B. Marsh, Director b

Project Directorate 111-1 Division of Reactor Projects lil/1V/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:

December 27, 1991

\\~

1

e r

ATTACHMEtrf TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 77 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-43 DOCKET NO. 50-341 Replace the following pages of the Appendix "A" Technical Specifications with the attached pages. The revised pages are identified by Amendment nunber and contain a vertica) line indicating the area of change.

REMOVE INSERT xxi xxi XXV xXV 3/4 4-19 3/4 4-19 3/4 4-20 3/4 4-20 3/4 4-21 3/4 4-21 3/4 4-22 3/4 4-22 B 3/4 4-3*

B 3/4 4-3*

C 3/4 4-4 B 3/4 4-4 B 3/4 4-5 8 3/4 4-5 B 3/4 4-6 0 3/4 4-6 B 3/4 4-7 B 3/4 4-7

  • Overleaf page provided to maintain document completeness.

No changes contained on this pane.

l u-

~.

S g3 llST OF FIGURES UG.V.BI PM 3.1.5 1 SODIUM PENTABORATE VOLUME /

CONCENTRATION REQUIREMENTS.....................

3/4 1-21 3.4.1.4-1 T HERMAL POWER VS. CORE FL0W....................

3/4 4 Sa 3.4.6.1 1 MINIMUM REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL METAL TEMPERATURE VS. REACTOR VESSEL PRESSURE....................

3/4 4-21

'3.4.10 1 THERMAL POWER VS. CORE FL0W....................

3/4 4 31 4.7.5 1 SAMPLE PLAN 2) FOR SNUBBER FUNCTIONAL TEST.....

3/4 7 21 B 3/4 3-1 REACTOR VESSEL WATE.1 LEVEL.....................

B 3/4 3 7 B 3/4.6.2 1 LOCAL POOL TEMPERATURE LlHli...................

B 3/4 6-5 B 3/4.7.3-1 ARRANGEMENT Of SHORE BARRIER SURVEY POINTS.....

B 3/4 7-6 5.1.1 1 EXCLUSION AREA.................................

5-2 5.1.2-1 LOW POPULATION 20NE............................

53 5.1.3 1 MAP DEflNING UNRESTRICTED AREAS AND SITE BOUNDARY-FOR RADIVACTIVE GASEQUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS......................................

54 I

l-L 1

'ERMI - UNIT 2 xxi Amendment No. M.,42,U,#, 77

INDE1 1IST Of TABLES __Icontinued) 16ELI l'Md.

4.8.2.1-1 BATTERY SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS............

3/4 8 12 3.8.4.2 1-PRIMARY CONTAINMENT PENETRATION CONDVC10R OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICES...............

3/4 B 19 3.8.4.3 1 MOTOR-0PERATED VALVES 1HERMAL OVERLOAD PROTEC110N...................................

3/4 8 21 3.8.4.5 1 STANDBY LIQUID CONTROL SYSTEM ASSOCIATED ISOLATION DEVICES 480 V M010R CONTROL CEN1ERS 3/4 8 27 4,11.1.1.1 1 RADI0 ACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND

-Atl AL Y S I S PR0G RAM.............................

3/4 11 2 4.11.2.1.2 1 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PR0 GRAM.............................

3/4 11-9 3.12.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0!1 MENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 3/4 12 3 3.12.1-2 REPORf!NG LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATION 3 IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES.....................

3/4 12 9

- 4.12.1 1 DETECTION CAPABillTIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALY$1S.....................................

3/4 12 10 l

5.7.1 1 COMPONENT CYCLIC-OR TRANSIENT - LIMITS.........

S-7 l

l 6.2.2-1 MINIMUM SHlfT CREW COMPOSITION...............

65 i

L i

i L

1 FEkMI UNIT 2 xxv Amendment No. E/. 77 r-4 vg*p - wwg,*g-t n----

'y w t - -

ya v yw w-,--r, e

g.

o,-am, w yyv.

w.,ww--

g

-w

+w-y

--w--em--we,-w-,o

.w--

ww -

a-,,,we.c.re,

+,

.www.w,w,.,,vwww-w -w w-e v - wee ' w

-w-w-..sv ww >ee-r=--F

i RE ACTOR C00L At[L SYSTEM 3/4.4.6_M[HBf/ TEMPERATURE LlHITS EfK IM COOLANT SYSTfB f

LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERA 110N 3.4.6.1 The reactor coolant system temperature and pressure shall be limited in accordance with the limit lines shown on figure 3.4.6.1 1 hydrostatic or leak testing; (2) Curve B for heatup by non nuc(lear means,1) Curve A fo cooldown following a nuclear shutdown and low Jower PHY:ilCS TESTS; and (3)

Curve C for operations with a critical core oiler than low power PHYSICS TESTS, with:

a.

A maximum heatup of 100'T in any 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> period, b.

A maximum cooldown of 100*f in any 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> period,

{

c.

A maximum temperature change of less than or equal to 20*F in any 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> period during inservice hydrostatic and leak testing operations above the heatup and cooldown limit curvet, and d.

The reactor vessel flange and head flange temperature greater than t

or equal to 71'r when reactor vessel head bolting studs are under

tension, APPLICABillTY: At all times.

ACTION:

With any of the above limits exceeded, restore the temperature and/or pressure to within the limits within 30 minutes; perform an engineering evaluation to determine the effects of the out of limit condition on the structural integrity of the reactor coolant-system; determine that the reactor coolant system remains acceptable for continued operations or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within !? hours and in COLD SHUTOOWN within the following 24 ho_urs.

SVRVilllANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.6.1.1 During system heatup, cooldown and inservice leak and hydrostatic testing operations, the reactor coolant system temperature and pressure shall be determined to be within the above required heatup and cooldown limits and to the right of the limit lines of figure -3.4.6.1 1 Curves A, B, or C, as L

applicable -at least once per 30 minutes, i

l l

l FERMI - Ohli 2 3/4 4-19 Amendment No. 77

REALTOR COOL ANl..ilSJE j,UR,qlQANCER[QUIREMENTS(Continued) 4.4.6.1.2 The reactor coolant system temperature and pressure shall be determined to be to the r'.ght of the criticality limit line of figure 3.4.6.1 1 Curve C within 15 minutes prior t the withdrawal of control rods to bring the reactor to criticality and at least once per 30 minutes during system heatup.

4.4.6.1.3 The reactor vessel material surveillance specimens shall be removed and examined, to determine changes in reactor pressure vessel material properties, as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix H in accordance with the schedule in Table 4.4.6.1.3 1.

The results of these examinations shall be used to update the curves of figure 3.4.6.1-1.

4.4.6.1.4 The reactor vessel flange and head flange temperature shall be verified.a be greater than or equal to 71*F:

a.

In OPERAT10flAL CONDITION 4 when reactor coolant system terrperature is:

1.

$ 100"F, at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.

2.

5 80*f, at least once per 30 minutes.

b.

Within 30 minutes prior to and at least once per 30 minutes during tensioning of the reactor vessel head bolting studs.

FERMI UNIT 2 3/4 4-20 Amend: rent No. 77

1 3 g,99 1400-J~7-7 e

e n

- --t-I

.9' 4

e, A e B,, C e

a

~ -+ --

1200 --

A' E l C',j o<

h) n.

t

\\

l n.

e I

C2 1000 -- - - -

, ' ' -I, -

1 J

t t

y t

j

-1 sn 8

i A'.B' E' - CORE DEL 1LINE g

l l

Ar1ER ASSUMED IQ9'T SHirl rROu Ao initial E00 T-l a

WELD RT,cor -44*r o

s--

1 i

U f

l (JJ 11.

A - SYSTEM HYDROTEST Liuli j

W11H TUEL IN VESSEL z

600 r

~

B - NON-NUCLEAR HEATUP/

)

t I

COOLDOWN LIMil 1

m0, C - NUCLEAR (CORE CRi14 CAL)

LIMil

~~

u a.

400 10i'r N VES5EL DISCONTINuit4 m,y1 LIMil5 j

'j CORE BELTLINE WITH

~~~

a 109'r SHIFT 200

~~

co,t ivo 32 Erpy CURvCS A'.B',C' NOT 73 y\\

LIMillNG. INFORMATION ONLY

/

/ /

CURvCS A.D.C ARE VALID

/

rOF 32 [rP) Or OPERAllON 1.

i O'

7 _a_

.00 400 500 600 O

100 700 MitvMUM REAC10R VESSEL MEI AL TEMPERATURE ('r) flGURE 3.4.6.1-1 MINIMUM REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL METAL TEMPERATURE VERSU5 REACTOR VESSEL PRESSURE FERM1 - UNIT 2 3/4 4-21 Amendment No. ;;

I

9.g.. -

.,v-

  • 4 g

, g

,$$NA-f :. ',v '

,1 $

.,,$ ~

f,,*

5 -

sy " ' -

?..._.

e j,

- 9,,,

ges '

.-4 s

s, t

y j

l

~ ~

?

sl. 5,f ^

'q_

. f) - h_;

?

hS

^

y y

r.

I

,,y il, TABLE 4.4.6.1.3-1 h

R_ FACTOR VESSil MATERI AL SURVilltANCE ' ~ "-RAM-WITilDRAWAL SJr~

h.

CAPSULE VESSEL LEAD WISIDRM 't.

Y O

tittMBER _

L0ct. TION FACTOP

(.t w

1 Azimuth 300 0.94 9

2 Azimuth 120 0.94 24 3

Azimuth 3C 0.94 St _'db.v w

N b

4m t

N N

l l

1 l

D E3 O

3 CL 9m 3c+

Z

?

N N

m wS j

'\\

ELA JML 00LANT S1STE BASES 3/4.4.5 Sf1CIFIC ACllVITY The limitations on the specific activity of the primary coolant ensure that the 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> thyroid and whole body doses resulting from a main steam line failure outside the containment during steady state operation will not exceed small fractions of the dose guidelines of 10 CFR 100. The values for the limits on specific activity represent interim limits based upon a parametric evaluation by the NRC of typical site locations.

These values are conservative in that specific site parameters, such as site boundary location and meteorological conditions, were not considered in this evaluation.

The ACTION statement permitting POWER OPERATION to continue for limited time periods with the primary coolant's specific activity greater than 0.2 microcuries per gram DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131, but less than or equal to 4.0 microcuries per gram DOSE EQUIVALENT l-131, accommodates possible iocine spiking chenomenon which may occur following changes in THERMAL POWER.

In 8

accordance with Generic Letter 85-19, the results of specific activity I

analyses in which primary coolant exceeds the limits of Specification 3.4.5 I

will be included in the Annual Report (Specification 6.9.1.5.d).

Information obtained on iodine spiking wi:1 be used to assess the parameters associated with spiking phenomena. A reduction in frequency of isotopic analysis following power changes may be permissible if justified by the data cbtained.

Closing the main steam line isolation valves prevents the release of activity to the environs should a steam line rupture occur outside containment.

The surveillance requirements provide adequate assurance that Excessive specific activity levels in the reactor coolant will be detected in sufficient time to take corrective action.

c l

FERMI - UNIT 2 B 3/4 4-3 Amendment No. 6

.RJACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM g3SJs

}/4.4.6 PRESS.URE/ TEMPERATURE LIMITS All components in the reactor coolant system are designed to withsDnd the effects of cyclic loads due to system temperature and pressure changes.

These cyclic loads are introduced by normal load transients, reactor trips, and startup and shutdown operations. The various categories of load cycles used for design purposes are provided in Section 5.2 of the UFSAR.

During j

startup and shutdown, the rates of temperature and pressure changes are 1;mited so that the maximum specified heatup and cooldown rates are consistent with ti. design assumptions and satisfy the stress limits for cyclic operation.

During heatup, the thermal gradients in the reattor vessel wall produce thermal stresses which vary from compressive at the inner wall to tensile at the outer wall.

These thermal induced compressive stresses tend to alleviate the tensile stresses induced by the internal pressure.

Therefore, a pressure-temperature curve based on steady state conditions, i.e., no thermal stresses, represents a lower bound of all similar curves for finite heatup rates when the inner wall cf the vessel is trmed as the governing location.

The heatup analysis also covers the determint ion of pressure-temperature limitatiens for the case in which the outer wall of the vessel becomes the controlling location. The thermal gradients established during heatup produce tensile stresses which add to the pressure stresses already present.

The l

thermal induced stresses at the outer wall of the vessel are tensile and are dependent on both the rate of heatup and the time along the heatup remp; therefore, a lower bound curve similar to that described for the heatup of the inner wall cannot be defined.

Subsequently, for the cases in which the outer wall of the vessel beames the stress controlling locction, each heatup rate I

of interest must be analyzed on an individual basis.

Figure 3.4.6.1-1 was developed based on a heatup rate limit of 100'F/HR.

The reactor vessel materials have been tested to determine their initial RTNDT. The results of these tests are shown in Section 5.2 of the UFSAR.

j Reactor operation and resultant fast neutron, E greater than 1 MeV, irradiation will cause an increase in the RTND Therefore, an adjusted reference temperature, based upon the fluence,T. nickel and copper content s -

the material in question, can be predicted using the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.99, Revision 7, " Radiation Embrittlement Of Reactor Vessel Materials." The pressure-temper oture limit curve, Figure 3.4.6.1-1, Curves A',

B' and C', includes predicted adjustments for this shift in RTND' for the end of life fluence.

However, Curves A, B, and C are more limiting I.han g

Curves A', B', and C'.

The actual shif t in RTNDT of the vessel material will be established

~

pariodically during operation by removing and evaluating, in accordance with A C.1 E185-73 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix H, irradiated reactor vessel material s,;ecimens installed near the inside wall of the reactor vessel in the core area.

Since the neutron spectra at the material specimens and vessel inside radius are essentially identical, the irradiated specimens can be used with confidence in predicting reactor vessel material transition temperature shift.

The operating limit curves of Figure 3.4.6.1-1 shall be adjusted, as required, on the basis of the specimen data and recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.99, Revision 2.

j FERMI - UNIT 2 B 3/4 4-4 Amendment No.77 l

D

mn

[..

, REACTOR COOLANT Sv5T M BASES E8 ESSURE / TEMPERATURE LIMITS (Continued)

The pressure temperature limit lines shown in Figure 3.4.6.1-1, curves C s

i and A, for reactor criticality and for inservice leak and hydrostatic testing have been provided to assure compliance with the minimum temperature.

requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR Part 50 for reactor criticality and for inservice leak and hydrostatic testing.

The number of reactor vessel irradiation surveillance capsules and the frequencies for removing and testing the specimens in these capsules are provided in Table 4.4.6.1,3-1 to assure compliance with the requirements of Appendix 11 to 10 CFR Part 50.

3/4.4.7 MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLATION VALVfji Double isolation valves are provided on each of the main steam lines to minimize the potential leakage paths from the containment in case of a line break.

Only one valve in each line is required to maintain the integrity of the containment, however, single failure considerations require that two valves be OPERABLE.

The surveillance requirements are based on the operating history of this type valve. The maximum closure time has been selected to contain fission products and to ensure the core is not uncovered following line breaks.

The minimum closure time is consistent with the assumptions of the safety analyses to prevent pressure surges.

344 4.8 Si, ZTURAL INTEGRilY 2

The inspection programs for ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components ensure that tbt structural integrity of these. components will be maintained at an acceptable level throughout the life of the plant.

Components of the reactor coolant system wer-designed to provide access to permit-inservice inspections in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code 1974 Edition and Addenda through Summer,1975.

The inservice inspection program for ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components will be performed ^ accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and applica&le addenda as required by 10 CFR 50.55a(g) except where specific written relief has been granted by the l

NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i).

3/4.4.9 RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL A single shutdown cooling mode loop provides sufficient heat removal capability for removing core decay heat and mixing to assure accurate temper 7ture indicatica, however, single failure considerations require that two loops be OPERABLE or that alternate methods capable of decay heat removal be demonstrated and that an alternate method of coolant mixing be in l

operation.

L FERMI - UNIT 2 B 3/4 4-5 Amendment No. 77

9 4

BASES TABLE B 3/4.4.6-1 THIS TABLE HAS BEEN DELETED l

1 pa i

1 l

FERM; - UNIT 2 B 3/4 4-6 Amendment No. 77

. ~. -.. _.. _

(

A i

THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED-4 1

BASES FIGURE B 3/4,4.6-1 1

FERMI - UNIT 2-B 3/4 4-7 Amendment No. 77

-