ML20091E894

Forwards Independent Assessment of Underpinning,Weekly Rept 76 for 840226-0303

ML20091E894
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	03/08/1984
From:	Karr J STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
To:	James Keppler NRC
Shared Package
ML20091E782	List: ML20091E818 ML20091E833 ML20091E870 ML20091E894 ML20091E900 ML20091E905 ML20091E925 ML20091E943
References
MPF-76, NUDOCS 8406010389
Download: ML20091E894 (17)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ __ _.__.._ __ _ m _ _ _2 STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.

P.O. Box 2325, BOSTON. M ASSACHUSETTS O2107 s

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 8, 1984 Midland Site Resident Office Route 7, J.O. No. 14358 Midland, Michigan Ref. MPF 76 Attention: Mr. R. Cook '

DOCKET No. 50-339/330 MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF UNDERPINNING REPORT NO. 76 A copy of the Independent Assessment of Underpinning Weekly Report No. 76 for the period of February 26, 1984 through March 3, 1984 is enclosed with this letter. Included as attachments are the minutes of the daily meetings held during the week between members of the Assessment Team and Site Engineering, Construction, and Quality Assurance personnel.

If you have any questions with respect to this report please contact me at (617) 589-2067.

A. Stanley eks Project Manager Enclosures ASL/pd

~

8406010389 840518 PDR ADOCK 05000329

.O PDR_

,o J. O. No. 14358 Midland Plant '

Units 1 & 2 Ladependent Assessment of Underpinning Weekly Report No. 76-February 26, 1984 through March 3, 1984 Personnel on Site Stone & Web ster Michigan, Inc.

P. Majeski 2/28 - 3/3 i D Denvie 2/27 - 3/3 R. Lykens. 2/29 - 3/3

- J .' Springer 2/26 - 2/28 W. Kilker 2/26 - 2/28 D. -Zito 2/28 - 2/28 4~

L. Rouen 2/26 - 2/28 A. Lucks 2/28 Parsons Brinckerhoff, Michigan Inc.

J. Oliveira 2/29 - 3/3 B. Metros 2/26 - 2/28

. Meetings Attended Date Represented Purpose 2/27 - 3/3: Stone & Webster Daily Assessment:

'Bechtel Team Meeting Consumers Power Parsons 2/29 Bechtel CAP Review xeeting Consumers Power Stone & Webster MPQAD.

Undercinning and Remedial Soils - Construction Kc 4 pier:

Excavation of the pier shaft has been completec to +1. 575.

Pier W-13: Placement of concrete in the pier shaft' was ccm;1sted to el.

592.3.

Pier.W-lo: Ex:avation of the drift and installation cf support steel continues.

CT-1: The ex:avatien and lagging have been completed cotel. 567.

, Dewatering ;-'teing accompliched with' lateral wellpoints.

Pier Kc-9: Placement of reinforcing steel.is nearly ccmplete. Plans are presently being: prepared for placement. off cencrete in:the pier.

Pier E-13: Excavation of the pier-has been completed and installation of reinforcing steel is:in progress.

Pier E-16: Excavation and lagging placement have progressed to el.,576.5.

~

a 3

- ~

'E^, ^

I 2

J. 0.1No. 14358

~

hEdland Plant-Units 1 &'2 Independent' Assessment of Underpinning CT-12: Excavation and lagging placement have been completed to el. 564.

UATs: Installation of the lateral wellpoints i'n the east and west UATs to dewater the control tower area has began.

SWPS: Installation of the first level Wale for the soldier pile wall on

~

the east side of the SWPS is in progress.

' Assessment Team Observations- Construction Pier shaft and bell' excavation, concrete placement, pier rejacking and dewatering activities continued in the Auxiliary Building. Concrete was'placed in pier W-13. Laspection activities related to concrete placement were co-ordinated satisfactorily between the Contractor and MPQAD. - All appropriate documentation was completed in' a timely manner with no impact on the concrete placement activities. Placement of concrete was performed in accordance with applicable documents. Free falling of concrete was maintained within permissible tolerances.

Vibration techniques used to consolidate the concrete were appropriate.

Finishing and curing of concrete met procedural requirements. It is the Assessment Team's opinion that procedural and technical requirements were effectively implemented during placement of concrete resulting in both an efficient operation and a high quality installation.

During excavation of the shaft for pier E-16,a sand layer was encountered.

Probing was performed to determine the extent of the sand layer. Results of the probing indicate that the sand extends into the area of the pier E-17 bell. Engineering is presently evaluating the impact on piers E-16 and E-17. The Assessment Team believes that the Contractor was responsive in recognizing the potential instability of'the sand layer. The subsequent probing activities -Mere prudent in order to minimite construction delays assceiated with these piers.

The Assessment Team observed installation of the first level' wale for the soldier pile wall on the east side of the SWPS. Installation and placement of the wale as completed to date was accomplished in accordance.witn the project procedures. The grade on all wale seats was main ained within specified tolerances resulting in a level installation of the' wale.' The metal to metal contact between the _ wale and the wale supports was sand 215ste:

~

to grey metal in accordance with surface preparation _ requirements. :It is the opir.icn of the Assessment Team that procedural requirements were implemer.ie:

adequately snd the resulting wale installation was satisfactory.

Assessmer.: Team Observations - OA/QC The QAP tare: force met' this week to ' discuss results of the subcommittee's-Quality Inspection points-review and evaluation. 'The subcommittee has~

reviewed construction procedures, PQCI's, and specifications associate" with. expansion anchor installation, fabrication-and e:ection of structural steel, 'and welding. Based on:4 review of;these documents,~ changes have been' recommended by the subcommittee to provide for:more efficient implementation and. inspection of_ the ~ construction process. cThe subcommittee recommended

'5at when. new or revised construction. procedures are ' developed attention

- shou l c 6e directed at ensuring that:

WU_

-3 J. O. No.'14358-Midland Plsnt

-Units 1 & 2 e Independent. Assessment of Underpinning

1. Construction procedures as supplemented by design drawings include all applicable information from the specification rather than using references.

2. Construction procedures and PQCIs are reviewed together for consistency.

3 A pilot program, to evaluate the effectiveness of a substantially revised PQCI against the current issue is implemented.

4. Each in-process inspection hold point should be evaluated to ensure that it is necessary to maintain the' required level of quality.

The subcommittee has further recommended that because all items associated with temporary underpinning are not of the same significiance, Project Engineering should identify the most important items. The necessary cuality attributes for these items would be defined in the design documents as a means to identify required inspection holdpoints.

As an additional effort to improve the efficiency of construction inspection activities, the subcommittee discussed processing of critical FCRs/ECNs and NCRs. It was pointed out that the method of handling these documents needs to be improved to provide foc more timely resolution of FCRs/FCNs and NCRs.

The Assessment Team believes that the subcommittee recommendations ::. er .ing the efficiency of the quality inspection process are appropriate and that these changes can be implemented while still maintaining quality requirements.

Additionally, the Assessment Team is of the opinion that expediting the processing of FCRs/FCNs and NCRs will greatly enhance.the efficiency of the construction activities.

A review _ of MPQAD receipt inspection of structural steel plates nnd spin lock anchors was performed by the Assessment Team. Q.C. Inspection Pecorts were used as a basis _for the evaluation. Inspection Reports 'were reviewed te verify material traceability, ensure that required dedumentation.ssch as certificates of conformance and certified mill test repcrts were attached a .t ecmpleted correctly, verify qualifications and certifications Of- the ins;e : r* .

and cenfirm that storage conditions were documented. All.Inspe::i:n Eep:r:s and the attached documentation reviewed were 0 =pleted accurately and One-Inspecters certifications.were fcund to be ag:eptable.

Work Acti"i:- Jackazes The foll:xn. c.':rk Activity Package (WAP) overviews are in the open respense stage or 2.- reen completed during the past week.

WAP No. Title Status (Opened) (Completed) 74 Auxiliary-Buildingi 2/23/84- 2/25/St Slab Support 75 Concrete Encasement 2/23/64- 2/27/Su=

of Concrete Stress Meters for SWPS -

I

4 J. O. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning WAP No. Title Status (0pened) (Completed) 77 SWPS Install 2/26/84 2/28/84 Phase II A/B Soldier Beams 1

Nonconformance Identification Reports

'Ihe following Nonconformance Reports (NIRs) remain open or have been closed during the past week.

NIR No. Descri ption Status (Oper.ed) (Closed) 22 Resident Engineering 2/21/84 Document Control Stations Open Items Items discussed during meetings are categorized as follows:

, CPEN ITEMS - An item for which an action is required. Tne item will remain open until the required action has been taken. Tracking is required.

CLOSED ITEM - An item, usually brought forward by the Assessmer.t Tea- that is discussed and adequately responded to. No tracking is requireo.

INFORMATION ITE'i - An item, brought forward to prcvide ger.eral tackgreur.d information regarding work, such as work status or an .u R: ming cesicr.

char.ge . No tracking is required.

~ ~ -

CFINION ITEM - An opinion or suggestion, gifen by ne ;33333 en- 73--

expressir.g an alternate constructior. or quality assurance :9:rni:ue, 77.3 opin10r. Or suggestion is given as a possible alterna e.v.3- .a , /3::, ..;3 ;g an operatior..

m m c~ n-- _. .e. .v. . ..( - This notation icer.tifies ar. 30 ;ior. tha a loses a preElousl:. .:r-ified open item. Tracking of the crer, item 3::;s.

The foll::,.nz i3 a listing of all Open items from the Dailt Meetinz .';;tes with eecht". E :ne text of the Weekly Re orts. Carry ~b 4 e-f from cas:

weeks whi .:. .2 ce teen Closed this week are also lis ex.

Item No. Description Closure 58-3 Tubular Steel tagging Cpen 64-7 QAP Review Program Cpen

. . m. . - .

M

-5

' 1

. g. . JZ 0.]No. 14358' -l Midland Plant

' ~

Units 1 & 2'

- Independent Assessment of Underpinning

- Item No. Description '

Closure 64 . Treno Analysis Open 71 -4 US Testing Work 76-15 Instructions 9 US Testing QA  : Open Nnual 71-17 Computerized Civil Open Drawing Register

- 71-29 Use of " Retired"_ FCRs Open 72-12 Welding Procedures 76-9 74-17 Co-ordination or '

76-33 Concrete Placement

Activities 74-21 US.; Testing Corrective Open Action i

74-25 Expansion-Anchors -Open 75-9 RE Document Control Open. .

75-24 Assessment Team Sampling 10'

, . Methodology.

14 Lateral Wellpoints at Open'-

Piers CT-1/12

( Q("

Project . i:.pr.eer 12(c. f

- Project Manager l

O

?

$_'_y-y ,s..

y jeh $ # '

l ,; fa <

r'

~ Notes of Daily Meeting

- Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company-

~ Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan February 27, 1984 Present For:

Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster i

G. Murray J. ' Fisher J. McMaster W. Kilker E. Cvikl 'D. Zito J. Gaydos J. Springer D. Benvie Parsons Brinckerhoff B. Fhtros PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.

DISCUSSICN Status Items Item 76-1 Auxiliary Building Underpinning !.ct191 ties.

Installation of the third set of drift. steel in the finger drift to Kc L is c0 plete.

The mudmat~ installed on 2/25/84 at the b0tt0=.cf pier W-13 was recoved due. ,

to insufficient strength. ;A new mudmat meeting stength requirement.was placed yesterday. '

~

-Excavati:n of the ' shaft for pier CTJ 2 has progresse::in::.the cd: a: at-el. 533.

~ -

Resnore mesters for the pier. E-16 La cess Lsnaft: :."ift cave cesn welded. int:

place.

. (INFCRM.Cid MEM)-

Item 76 ' JS Underpinning Activities.

J. Fisher c:;:rted ;that preparations are b51ng.cade to tegin installati:n of the top. le7el waler.for -the soldier pile retaining wall at the SWPS.

(INFORMATION ITEM).

- Item'76-32 . Resident Engineering Docu=entlCentrol.-

~

E.. Cvikl supplied ,the Assessment 1 Team with cocies of_ the Contractor's ;uality Engineering procedures for monitoring Resident' Engineering controlled dccuzents -

i and the administrative procedure for distributing and implementing.thei ?esident Engineering Controlled Document Register... _ (Iiec 7 -9 ' remains CPE'O 1INF:EM.C::::

ITEM). _

L 7 1

- ,,.L; ,' .

~ . , s - - - -

T l e T l ~

f N P

1 r

-Notes of Da'ily Me:tingi . .

~Ind: pendent'Assessmenttof Underpinning

-Midland-Plant, Units--1 &~2

' Consumers Power Company T ' Held at Midland Site.

L ' Midland, Michigan *

' February 27, 1984:

Item 76 NIR #.20.

The Assessment Team completed a review 2/24/84 of the response to NIR # 20. The response stated that there is no quality impact

-in calibrating the concrete admixture dispensers to a 12 fluid ounce limit-vs an 8 fluid ounce limit. A small difference in admixture volume would have a- negligible effect in slump' and if any effect was noted the slump acceptance criteria will govern. The Assessment Team concurs with this response and therefore , NIR # 20 has been closed. (INFORMATION ITEM) a.

New Items Item 76 Testing of Piezometer BB-2.

D. . Zito asked why it. takes over a day to' determine the quantity of soil particles discharged at piezometer BB-2. J. Fisher will respond.

(OPEN' ITEM)

Item 76 Expedition of Drill Permits Process.

J. Springer asked if checking design drawings to identify the possible-presence of rebar in fill concrete prior to the start of concrete removal would help expedite the drill permit process and alleviate delays similar to -those that 'have occurred. J. Fisher. responded that~

the presence of rebar in fill concrete cannot always be determined frcm design drawings. Additionally, the drill permit procedures do not allow prior approval for cutting rebar. . (CLOSED . ITEM)

Iten 76 Oil Observed at Jacks. .

3. -Metros stated that he had observed the presence of oil onEthe jacks-at piers Kc-2 and. Kc-11 and_ quest.ioned.the cause of:the oil. J. Fisher will respond. (OFEN ITEM)~

Item 76 - Rejacking of the W-8~ Grillage.

1J.

~

Fisher' rep;sted that rejacking ofsthe W-S grillage to increase the

~

load on :ca grillage is . scheduled for 2/29/84 Loadits of the grillage-will be dine in increments 'not exceeding 5% of the specified design load.

An evaluati:n will be made after each 5% increment en whether to.meniter for acce;;a:.:e: or continue to the next increment. .The maximu. lead in the grillage will not. exceed L160% of the specified ' design = load during-rejacking. ' Additionally, upward building movement at the grillage' will -

be limited to:90 mils. (INFORMATION ITEM)-

lResoonse Items

~ Item 76 Welding Procedures.

J.' Springer stated thatsthe Contractor has : finished their. evaluation -of-welding completed to- date. The evaluation found that noi.e cfc che ;welcihg, E -

c m m

=~q M m

Notes of Daily Meeting-

. Independent Assessment of. Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2

' Consumers Power Company-

-Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan

- February 27, 1984

! completed had been performed under conditions of severe external shrinkage restraint. The Assessment Team concurs with this conclusion. (All other action items listed in Item 72-17 have _been previously addressed. Therefore, Item 72-12 is closed)~ (CLOSES ITEM 72-12)

Item 76 Assessment Team Review of RE Document Control.

W. Kilker provided a description of the sampling techniques used and '

attributes considered for the Assessment Team review of the Resident Engineers: document control station. Based on standard sampling _ techniques,

~ 50 drawings out of a total population of 402 drawings were selected for review. Attributes evaluated during the review included verification of proper revision numbers, the presence.of change documents and legibility of the documents.- '1he Design Document. Register and the Resident Ergineers

- Distribution Schedule were used on a basis for performing the review. (CLOS:2 ITEM 75-24) e b

w

'k e

4

~-, .

'Notts of Daily Meiting .

s

Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant , Units 1 & 2 Consumers Pcwer Company.

Held at Midland Site s Midland, Michigan February 28, 1984 Present For:

Consumers' Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G. Murray J. Fisher J. McMasteri D. Benvie E. Cviki W. Kilker J., Gaydos D. Zito.

J.- Springer A. Lucks Parsons Brinckerheff B. Metros PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Indepencer.:

Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.

DISCUSSICN Status Items Item 76 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.

Excavation of the pier Kc 4 shaft has began.

~

Excavation of-the pier E-13 has been completed to subgrade el. 564.7 .

(INFORMATION ITEM)

Item 76 Dewatering Control Tower Area.

J. Fisher. stated that two horizontal drains will be installed in-esch of the UATs in order to. drain perched grcundwater fr:.T tensath tr.e control tower.- '(INFORMATION ITEM);

Item 76 13 - Trend Analysis.

J. McMaster. distributed copies of MFCAD procedures ~ M'I-1 which will te used to 'm;lement a trend analysis program for tracking NCEs. The procecure effectivity date is 4/1/84 (Item 63-10. remains OPEN (INFCPXCI:?! ITEM)

Item 76 Lateral Wellpoints at pier CT 1/12.-

~

- B. Metros requested that FSO review the operation of:the lateral wellpcints.

- installed in piers CT-1/12 to determine if the cerformance'eculd be imcroces.

- J. LFisher will respond. (OPEN ITDO s

L  %

'l

.. . , - ~

u: '

4

Notes of Daily Meeting

' Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 &'2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site '

Midland, Michigan February 28, 1984 Response Items Item 76 US Testing Work Instructions.

Submittal of issued US Testing Work Instructions to.the Assessment Team is being tracked uncer Item 74-21 and therefore Item 71-4 is closed. (CLOSES ITEM 71-4)-

Item 76 Testing of Piezometer BB-2.

J. Fisher stated that it does not take a full day to perform testing needed to determine the quantity of soil particles discharged at the piezometer. Performance of this test takes 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. .The remainir.g time required to place piezometer BB-2 into service was associated with well development. (CLOSES ITai 76-5) o 4

s S

t .

t i

t l

ts ig-F- _

~

r Notts of Daily Me: ting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site s Midland, Michigan February 29, 1984

• Present For!

! Consumers Power Bechtel MPOAD Stone & Webster

, t_ G. Murray i J. . Fisher J. McMaster D. Benvie E. Cviki R. Sevo R. Lykens

~

J. Gaydos P. Majeski M. Blendy J. Kelliher Parsons Brinckerhoff J. Oliveira PURPOSE

't This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.

, DISCUSSION g l 'S_tatus Items t

Item 76 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.

( A sand sean was enecuntered during excavati;r. cf the shaft for pier E 16.

Greuting plans are being developed to stabilize the sand in the vicinity of the pier shaft. Additionally, probir.g will 'ce perferred in-pier E-;6 to assess the extent of the sand layer in the vicinity cf pier E-17 Excavation of the shafts for niers CT-1/12 has cregressed through the

,s muttat at el. 533. .

.s, , ) nstallation of reinforcing in pier % '3 nas began.

.*' ' Placement'of the drift post rakers in pie.as e; ~6 has teen ::::le:e:.

1 ,

.INFCP.'GTI :. I~iM) i< .

Item 76 ' - Trend Analysis.

J. Mc7.22: s^ t ated that methodology for e: rf.11:.s the data base f:r .:se ir implement:ng :ne trend analysis procedure is presently teing-develcped.

Compils:L. f the data base'is scheduled f:r ::=;1etion by 3 2<5*. :er 10 re..a.ns PEN) (INFORMATION ITEM)

Item 76 Expansion Anchors.

M. Blendy discussed pcssible' changes being evaluated to improve the Hil:1~

bolt. installation program. The use of a rapid set grout to provide a uniform surface ber.eath the bearing plate is being considered to address loosening of washers. The contractor is also evaluating the possibility of loosening the Hilti bolts after initial. tensioning .until c:nstrue:i:n activities in the' vicinity of the bolt have progressed away fr:r the area, such that possible vibrations due.to work in progress do not impa:: the 4

x

Notsa of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2

.-_ Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site s Midland, Michigan February 29, 1984 Hilti anchorage. The Hilti's will then be retensioned to design load.

(Item 74-25_ remains OPEN)' (INFORMATION ITEM)

Item 76-21,'- Resident Engineering Document'Contr$1.

E. Cviki provided the Assessment Team with a copy of Management-Correctice. Action Report # 73. (Item 75-9 remains OPEN) (INFORMATION ITEM)

New Items No new items were discussed.

Response Items Item 76 Oil Observed at Jacks.

J. Fisher responded to the Assessment Teams' question concerning oil observed at the Kc-2 and Kc-11 jacks. During removal of the hoses from the jacks, some oil may have. leaked out of the hoses and onto tne jacks. To date the leaking oil has not impacted the load carryirs capacity of the jacks. In any case, overall performance of the jacks is closely monitored to ensure that jacks perfom satisfactorily.

(CLCSES ITEM 76-7)

(

f*

]

l - - .

Notre of Daily Meeting i Independent Assessment of Underpinning l Midland Plant, Units 1 &~2 {

Consumers-Power Company l

- Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan '

March 1, 1984 P, resent For:

Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G. Murray .J. Fisher J. McMaster .D . Benvie J. Schaub E. Cviki R. Sevo 'P . Majeski J. Gaydos R. Lykens R. Cleary Parsons Brinckerhoff .

, J. Oliveira PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.

. DISCUSSION Status-Items Item 76 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.

Preliminary probing in pier E-16 ' indicates -that the sand layer encountered in E-16 may be present in pier E-17. Additional probings will be performed-today in order to retrieve soil samples in'the vicinity of the E-17 bel _.

Placement of reinforcement in Piers Kc-9 and W-13 has been ecmpleted.

Rejacking of the W-8 grillage began yesterday. #

(INFCEMATION ITEM) item 76 SWPS Underpinning Activities.

J. Fisher stated that installation of the waler en the sel:isr cile wale al:ng tne east side of the SWPS has been completec. (IN?:EV.; TION -ITEM Item ~6 - Tubular Steel: Lagging.

E. Cviki m :-iied the Assessment Team with-2 of 3 DCNs designating'those areas in -L4 _:inity of the Auxiliary Building ;where- filling of Linternal, voids in - t_:ular-steel lagging is required. Issuance of.thelthird DCN has been ' _ iced until MPQAD has reviewed the DCN. J. -Mc'< aster was requested

' to determir.- :ce reason :for the delay with_ MPOADs review hf the DCN. (Item 58-3 remains C?EN) _. (INFORMATION ITEM)~ '

IItem=76 US Testing CorrectiveLAction.

R. Cleary gave a status reportion upgrading ceing' undertakeniby US Testing.

The scheduled completion date for qualifying 90Wof _US; Testing technicians

-to at 'least 20 certifications' is 6/22/84 'As a result of the recreanization , .

of4US Testing require'd by:ESO, only.one? lab :hief will be. require:Icn site.

Th'e labichief_ is expected to be: qualified 'to 44 certifications cy -d /

• tS4; '

F

+-J n-

>a $( m - . .

Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland-Plant, Units 1 & 2 Con 3umers Power Company Held at Midland Site ,

Midland, Michigan Phrch 1, 1984 Tkenty five work instructions are presently being' reviewed by Project Engineering. Issuance of the remaining twenty two work instructions is scheduled for completion on 4/1/84. P. Majeski requested that FSO advise the Assessment Team as to the level of training that will be required for US Testing assisstant 130 chiefs. (Item 74-21 remains OPEN) (INFORMATION ITEM)

New Items Item 76 FSO Controlled Document Review.

P. Majeski requested a copy of the monthly FSO document control station review performed in February. J. Fisher will respond . (OPEN ITEM)

Item 76 Weekly Report # 75.

W e ekly Report # 75 was reviewed for open items. It was determined that all open items had been previously identified. (CLOSED ITEM)

Response Items No response items were discussed. -

Notes of Daily Meeting Independent ~ Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2

' Consumers Power Company ,

l

. Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan March 2, 1984 Present For:

Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & We bster G. Murray' J. Fisher J. McMaster D. Be vie R. Wheeler E. Cviki R. Sevo P. Majeski R.- Wieland- J. Gaydos R. L'ykens Parsons Brinckerhoff J. Oliveira PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.

DISCUSSION Status Items s

_ Item 76 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.

Concrete was placed in pier W-13.

Installation-of reinforcing steel in pier'E-13'has begun.

Additional probing in pier E-16 indicates that a portion of the bell for pier ~E-17 is in naturalisand.

The W-8 grillage was locked off yesterday at 120% of specified design load.

2, (INFORMATION ITEM)

Iten 76-?C - Tubular Steel Laggirg.

J. McMaster discussed the delay associated with F20AEsl review of. the tCN for filling of tubular lagging internal voids at the. Auxiliary Euilding.

Due t: ;c.e Step Work ' Order a large backlog of drawings had accumulated at Cer. ra. Occument Control. Since lifting of tne Stop Werk Crder, -

distri:uti:n of the ace:Jnulated controlled documents has teen slow due to~the large-babklog . MPCAD'has only recently-received the drawing needed :: review the DCN. (Item 58-3 re"ains OPEN) -.(INFCF'GTICN ITDI)

New Items y

3~ ')

No new items were discussed.

I }

P 3: 1 :$

. ,s '.. . '

..i

' Notes'of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company s

Held at Midland Site Midlan'd, Michigan March 2, 1984 Response Items Item 76 FSO Controlled Document Review. .

J. Fisher stated that although a monthly review had not been conducted in February, a review verification program is being implemented during the FSO takeover of the underpinning subcontractors document control stations.

This verification process effectively satisfies the intent of the monthly review. (CLOSFS ITEM 76-27)

Item 76 Co-ordination of Conetete Placement.

The Assessment Team observed the placement of concrete at pier W-13. In the Assessment Teams opinion, the co-ordination' effort on the part of FSO and MPQAD was good resulting in a timely completion of inspection activities associated with placement of concrete. Therefore, Item 74-17 is closed.

(CLOSES ITEM 74-17) 1 h

- 9. ,

" j

.y

~

, d, ' .. Y g

~. . ,

.; e 1h ,'~

'f

.E.. *

' ~

E3  ; _ _ , _ , _