ML20082P761
| ML20082P761 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee, Catawba |
| Issue date: | 01/01/1991 |
| From: | Birch M, Hampton J, Stewart J DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15217A128 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-910101-01, NUDOCS 9109110049 | |
| Download: ML20082P761 (19) | |
Text
a~u,,-
rw s m
em 4
-s
_.<4_4.-2L4 s,444+..**,J-M 3,
-.4seau r4
.-a.
,ad
-4aJ A
&A-.*
Ma
,-A-A 4
=
December 27, 1990
SUBJECT:
Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Revision 30-The General Office Radiation Protoceion staff is transmitting to you this date, Revision 30 of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.
As this revision only affects Catawba Nuclear Station, the approval of other station managers is not required.
Please update your copy No. ____, and discard the affected pages.
REMOVE THESE PAG 2S INSERT THESE PAGES C-1 Rev. 12 C-1 Rev. 30 C-2 Rev. 12 C-2 Rev. 30 Figure C1.0-2 Rev. 4 (1 of 2)
Figure C1.0-2 Rev. 30 l1 of 2)
C-5 Rev. 19 C-5 Rev. 30 C-11 Rev. 12 C-11 Rev. 30 L
C-12 Rev. 25 C-12 Rev. 30 C-12a Rev. 25 C-12a Rev. 30 Pages C-14 Pages'C-14 0
thru Page C-22 Rev. 25 thru Page C-22 Rev. 30 C-23 Rev. 25
- C-23 Rev. 30 NOTE:
As this' letter, with its attachments, contains "LOEP" information,-please insert this in front of the December 26, 1990 letter.
Approval Date:
e 2 !/ 7 fb
/
Approval Date:
12/17/90 j
/
Effective Date: 1/1/91 Effective Date:
1/1/91 dLL/-
, b 4. t" i4ary L.'B[rch
/
W.
Ham ton, Manager l
Radiation Protection Manager Catawba Nuclear Station If you have any questions concer.ing Revision 30, please call-L Jim Stewart at
- 04) 373-5444.
I w /# L). -r/
James M.
Stewart, Jr.
' Scientist
- Radiation Protection JMS/prm.091 9109110049 910029 POR ADOCK 05000269 P
PDR J
JUSTIFICATIONS FOR REVISION 30 Page C-1 Updated section C1.1 to more accurately describe actual station operation.
Page C-2 Corrected spelling of "Adsorber".
Added additional description to section C1.2.
Updated section C1.2.1 to more accurately describe actual station operation.
Figure C1.0~2 Corrected spelling of "Adsorber".
Updated flow rates to agree with values listed in FSAR.
Page C-5 Updated section C2.l.2 Part d.
to more accurately describe actual station operation.
Page C-11 Changed containment purge rate and Auxiliary Building flow-rate to agree with values used in.FSAR.
Updated associated calcula-tions using new flowrate rates.
Pages C-12 and'C-12a Updated sections using dose calculations based on 1990 Effluent Release Data (first nine months) and the 1990' Land Use Census Data.
Pages C-14 thru C-22 Updated sections using dose calculations based on 1990 Effluent Release Data (first nine months) and the 1990 Land Use Census Data.
l
C1.0 CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION RADVASTE SYSTEMS Cl.1 LIQUID RADVASTI PROCESSING The liquid radwaste system at Catawba Nuclear Station (CNS) is used to collect and treat tiuid chemical and radiochemical by-products of unit operation.
The system produces effluents which can be reused in the plant or discharged in small, dilute quantities to the environment.
The means of treatment vary with wasta type and desired product in the various systems:
A)
Filtration - All waste sources are filtered during processing.
In some cases, such as the Laundry and Hot Shower Tank ( LHST) Subsystem of the Liquid Waste (WL) System, filtration may be the only treatment required.
B)
Adsorption - Adsorption of 1.alides and organic chemicals by activated charcoal (Carbon Filtration) can be used as needed for the wasa; streams in the WL System.
C)
Ion Exchange - Ion exchange is used to remove radioactive cations (cobalt, manganese) and anions (iodone) from the waste streams.
This process can be used on all waste streams as needed.
D)
Gas Stripping - The fluids processed in the WL System does not contain entrained fission gases.
Those fluids that are processed for recycle, however, do contain entrained fission gases.
Removal of these gaseous radioactiva fission products is accomplished in both the NB and VL Evaporators.
These gases are stored in the Waste Gas Holdup System for I
decay prior to release.
E)
Distillation and Concentrat ion - Evaporation is used to process racyclable liquids for reuse in the primary systems.
Howevnt, the
.porators can be used to process non-recyclable fluids in an emergency r
s ituat ion.
In this case, the distillate would be recycled to the primary systems while the concentrates would be solidified and routed to an approved low-level waste disposal site.
Figure C1.0-1 is a schematic representation of the liquid radwaste system at
- Catawba, s
C-1 Rev. 30 1/1/91
f
.i t
i I
C1,2~
GASEOUS RADWASIT SYSTEMS l
q The gaseous waste dispos'al system for Catawba is designed with the capability of processing the fission product gases from contaminated reactor coolant
. fluids resulting from operation.
The system shown schematically in Fig. C1.0-2 is designed to allow for the r-stention and subsequent decay of the gaseous
-fission products generated from the reactor coolant system via the chemical and j
volume control system and/or the boron recycle system in order to limit the
)
need for intentional discharge of high level radioactive gases from the waste gas holdup tanks.
Sources of low-level radioactive gaseous discharge to the environment include periodic purging operations of the containment, the j
auxiliary building ventilation system, the secondary system air ejector and j
decayed WG Tanks.
With respect to purging operations, the potential
)
contamination is expected to arise from uncollectible reactor coolant leakage.
l' With respect to the air ejector, the potential source of contamination will be from leakage of the reactor coolant to the secondary system through defects in j
steam generator tubes.
The gaseous waste disposal system includes two waste gas compressors, two catalytic hydrogen recombiners, six gas decay storage tanks for use during normal power generation, and two gas decay storage' tanks for use during shutdown and startup operations, and for pressure relief l
C1.2.1 Gas Collection System j
i The gas collection system combines the waste hydrogen and fission gases from h
the volume control tanks and that from the boron recycle gas stripper i
evaporator produced during normal operation with the gas collected during the i
shutdown degasification (high percentage of nitrogen) and cycle it through the i
catalytic recombiners converting all the hydrogen to water.
After the water i
is removed, the resulting gas stream is transferred from the recombiner into
- the gas decay tanks, where the accumulated activity may be contained.
From j
the decay tanks the gas will flow back to the compressor suction to complete
[
the circuit.
I C 1. 2. 2.
Containment and Auxiliary Building Ventilation i
Nonrecyclable reactor coolant leakage occurring either inside the containment j
or inside the auxiliary building will generate gaseous activity.
Gases result-
)
ing from leakage inside the containment will be contained until the containment f
air _i;s released through the VQ or VP system.
The containment atmosphere will be discharged through a charcoal adsorber and a particulate filter prior to l
l release to the atmosphere.
Gases resulting from leakage inside the auxiliary building ar. released, with-t out further decay, to the atmosphere via the auxiliary building ventilation
- system, The ventilation exhaust from potentially contaminated areas in the auxiliary building is normally unfiltered.
!!owever, on a radiation monitor alarm, the exhaust is passed through charcoal adsorbers to reduce releases to
[
I the atmosphere.
C1.2.3 Secondary Systems i
l j
Normally, condensate flow and steam generator blowdown will go parallel x
C-2 Rev. 30 1/1/91 f
..~
i
?
s P
lp WCS*&2 i(
_ ROOF itNTS,
1,600,200 cfm
Lt--------- x---.
7,2a i
h >. - - :
r-- o w=
cRouNo v475 0E AR 4 aggpigg i
g Aiq
. r.i
- RYM ARY f
-k f
gn7 00NDENSER to W r
k 1f COND(NSER
'EMI*37 L-- _.------___A GENERATOR W
t i
I'E AM JEI AIN "JRBiNE 88,,D 0 I'
t i
EJE CTORS 5
EuF-34 TO *O* FtE0w ATER NEA rERS 1
i Eur-33 4~
f[;
BLOWDCwN 2
'ECYOLE r
(Wj TANE j
I t
SECOND ARY SYSTEM (2 VNIT$)
f LETDcWN F(OW 000LANT SYSTEu '
' (0) MYOROCEN -
i,
FROM REACTOR I
l
[
~
i ! mE00W8'NER$ Il
(
S.
- f d
1
'I
~ ll,
~I hd l
i s
}
j
! I t
I
- A5TE CAS 1
aaupegg$ q$ !
C XYOEN
- A*E* i i
.A I
i 4
UNIT $)
-.A k i 1
v v0Luut g
7'- s i f f
70 00NTROL T ANE '
O:
"2 SHUTOOWNi f I y0tyyg l
k 1
i i
JN4T 1
/
,\\
5?OR Act ?,,
?
=1 s7qot TANKS
! l
""74ng I
l 3
j u_-us
__----_-------------_s'
}
j (j'
/
yotygg r
i
.,0
,3 00NTROL TAW I
~.',
UNIT 2 8
REACTOR REACTOR A
t i
GA$
OA5 TANK $ '
l OCRCN REOYCLE 3?cgAgg l
l ll 600 FT3 swiMetEE0 TAN s r
30c F.,
l EVAPORATOR
[
G A5 $M1PPER i
f 3
.I C" *00 i l
I k
WA$it CAS SY$7Eu a
w 00 sfm i'J if CONTA1NutNT A64 RELEA$E P AIC:
00NTAINWENT 0014TAINWENT T
& A00iflCN SY5'Eu WO)
NORMALLY
[
MPPER WWut I
OLOSE3 i
=9
{c; LOWER YOG WE 8'AiC!
r*
~
g) 1 TOTAL FL0s = 26.000 cfm p
__ e y
avRct cvTui bP)
PuRaC 'Na*'
f uf-38 I
- :>=-= C ; A. P L,*,,,
.0-t.
EMF-33
(,uf-4]
00NT A;NWENT %TNULATION %YSTEu$ (2) iNIERN ATL.11EOl ROV. ' RAINS (2)
@F-4 2 i
- 000 c'm E ACH J3.000 c'm i
~
-9:A<0M r" f
f.EL M ANOUNO VMI c.%
f
~
^8EA Eur-c t
- N dad f
- 60.000 c'm
- - e i
t WISOE "-
CONT AMIN A 40 8 A i C -4 f A!R ARgA$
@ WI g
g l
~
- 5 "" O * *m e
AUHUARY
.,pgp ggggg
' 3 **
l DVC%;
- ER UNtf n
=
t
$UPPt,Y FANS AW AC A# V 940 ;;0 PO*EM g!H i 5 C,
t P = nEnt tR A = niGH-E8FlC:ENCY S AR 90ULA T r'tTER
[
0 = OH ARCO 4w a;3ORSER 6
i
. FyEL n ANCL:NG AniEA :S NCRMedY UhFtL*ESEO. bPCN A A A01 ATION ALAfiu BY EMF-42. IhE EAHAUST MLL Et CWERTE0 IO F
THE FIL'ER WOCE.
i
(
l
?
1*
' 7 i } C ! A 4. *
"- ~
ncuat Cte-2 P
C A T A A9 A NUOMAR $TATN
/ 91 SACEDU$ A AC A ASTE SYS?t'u
' Q O 1..P.o.
f s a y..
i $ '
.s
l C2.1.2 Conventional Waste Water Treatment System Effluent Line (kC)
The conventional waste water treatment system effluent is potentially radio-active; that is, it is possible the effluent will contain measurable activity above background.
it is assumed that no activity is present in the effluent until indicated by periodic analysis of the composite sample collected on that line.
The water sources listed below that are normally discharged via the conventional waste water treatment system and/or the Turbine Building Sump will be diverted if they will cause the WC discharge to exceed administrative limits designed to ensure that station release limits will not be exceeded, a.
Containment Ventilation Unit Condensate Effluent Line The containment ventilation unit condensate effluent line could potentially discharge into the Turbine Building sump, but if activity is detected above its monitor's setpoint, the discharge will be terminated and an alarm actuated. The containment ventilation unit condensate tank will then be pumped to the RHT or W5fT, recirculated, sampled, processed thru the WL system if necessary, and then discharged through the liquid waste effluent line and monitored.
b.
Auxiliary Feedwater Sump Pumps and Floor Drain Sump Pump Line Normally the discharge line coming from these sumps will discharge into the Turbine Building sump, but if activity is detected above its monitor's setpoint, the discharge flow will automatically be routed to the floor drain tank for processing and later be discharged through the liquid waste effluent line.
Subsequent radioactive releases may be allowed to discharge into the TBS if administratively controlled to assure that release limits are not exceeded.
c.
Steam Generator Blowdown Line Normally the discharge from the Steam Generator Blowdown will be pumped to the Turbine Building Sump, but if activity is detected above its monitor's setpoint, each blowdown flew control valve. the atmospheric vent, and the valve to the Turbine Building Sump will close, thus terminating the discharge.
Blowdown can only be continued by venting the steam to "D" heater and pumping the liquid to the condensate system.
d.
Turbine Building Sump Discharge Line Normally the discharge from the Turbine Building sump will go into the conventional waste water treatment system, but if activity is detected above its monitor's setpoint, the sump pumps A, B, and C will stop and an alarm actuated.
The Turbine Building sump discharge line can then either be routed to the steam ganerator drain tanks for processing, or allowed to continue being discharged via the circuit with propet administrative controls implemented to assure that release limits are not excended.
C-5 Rev. 30 1/1/91
_o____________
4
[~'
'C3.2 GAS MQNITORS r
\\,
The following equation shall be used to calculate noble gas radiation monitor setpoints based on Xe-133 (Historical data shows that Xe-133 is the predominant l
1sotope):
K(X/Q)Q < 500
-(see Section C2.2.1) g 4
)
Q = 4.72E+02 C f (see' Section C2.2.2) g g
1 C < 116/f 1
where:
C
= the gross activity in undiluted effluent, in uCi/ml 1
l f
= the. flow from the tank or building sources, in cfm l
i K
= from Table 1.2-1 for Xe-133, 2.94E+2 mrem /yr per pCi/m' X/Q
= 3.1E-05, as defined in Section C.2.2.2
.As stated in Section C2.2, the unit vent is the release point for,the contain-ment purge ventile'.lon system, the containment air release and addition system, i
the condenser air ejector, and auxiliary building ventilation.
t For: releases from the containment purge ventilation system, a typical radiation
\\
monitor-setpoint may be calculated as follows:
i C < 116/ f = 6. 59E-04 i
g t
i where:
3; f = 150,000 cfm (auxiliary building ventilation) + 26,000 cfm (containment purge) = 176,000 cfm For release from the containment air release and addition system, the waste gas
{
decay tanks, the condenser air ejectors, and the auxiliary building E
ventilation, a typical radiation monitor setpoint may be calculated as follows:
C, < 116/f = 7.73E-04 I
i i
1 where:
f = 150,000 cfm (auxiliary building ventilation) l_
i
?
I C-11 Rev. 30 1/1/91 t
f I
L.
a....-
m 4
C4.0
' DOSE CALCULATIONS C4, l '
FREQUENCY OF CALCULATIONS
- Dose contributions to the maximum individual shall be calculated at least every 31 days, quarterly, semiannually, and annually (or as required by Tech-nical Specifications) using th3 methodology in the-generic information sections.
This methodology _shall also be used for any specia'l reports.
Dose calculations that are required for individual pre-release calculations, and/or abnormal releases shall not be calculated by using the simplified dose calculations.
Station dose projections for these types and others that are known to vary from the station historical averages shall ce calculated by using the methodology in the generic-information section.
STATION Dose projections may be performed using simplified dose estimates.
~
~ Fuel cycle dose calculations shal1 be performed annually or as required by special reports.
Dosa contributiens shall be calculated using the methodology in the appropriate-generic information sections.
C4.2 DOSE MODELS FOR MAXIMUM EXPOSED INDIVIDUAL
' C4.2.1 Liould Effluents For dose contributions from liquid radioactive releases, dose calculations based on operational source term data and NUREG-0133 guidance indicate that the maximum exposed individual would be an adult who consumed fish caught in the discharge canal and who drank water from the nearest " downstream" potable water intake. - The dose from Cs-134 and Cs-137 has been calculated to be 91% of that
.l individual's total body dose, C4,2.2 Gaseous Effluents l
C4,2.2.1 Noble' Gases For dose contributions from exposure to beta and gamma radiation from noble gases, it is assumed that the maximum exposed individual is an adult at a controlling location in the unrestricted area where the total noble gas dose is t
determined to be a maximum.
Ci.2.2.2 Radiciodines, Particulates, and Other Radionuclides T 1/2 ) 8 days For dose contributions from radiciodines, particulates and other radionuclides; it is assumed that the maximum exposed individual is a child or infant at a cor, trolling location in the unrestricted area where the total. inhalation, food and ground plane pathway dose is determined to be a maximum based on operation-11 source term data, land use surveys,'and NUREG-0133 guidance.
?
+
V L
?
C-12 Rev. 30 1/1/ 91 l
i
C4.3 SIMPLIFIED DOSE ESTIMATE
'C4.3.1 Liquid Ef fluents For dose estimates, a simplified calculation based on the assumptions presented in Section C4.2.1 and operational source term data is presented below.
Updated operational source term data shall be used to revise these calculations as necessary.
m D,.B = 6.38E+05 I (F )(T ) (C
+ 0.59 C s-137) t t
C s - 13 *,
u t=1 where:
6.3SE+05 = 1.14E+05 (U
/D
+U BF.) DF.
(1.10) aw-w af i
att where:
8 1.14E+05 = 10'pci/ uCi x 10 mlikg + 8760 hr/yr U,
730 t/yr, adult water consumption
=
37.7, dilution factor from the near field area to the nearest potable D
=
water intake.
U,f =-21 kg/yr, adult fish consumption BF. = 2.00E+03, bicaccumulation factor for Cesium (Table 3.1-1) 1 DF. = 1.21E-04, adult, total body, ingestion dose factor far Cs-134 (Table 3.1-2) 1.10 = factor derived from the :,s s ump t ien that 91*. of dose is from Cs-l's and Cs-137 or 100* + 91* =
10 And wnere:
fc
-'t ~ F+f where:
f = liquid radwaste flow, in gpm o = recirculation factor at equilibrium, 1.027 (see Section C2.1.1)
F = dilution flow, in z.pm C-12a Rev. 30 1/1/91
i s;
O lC4.3.2 Gaseous Effluents 1N Meteorological data is provided in Tables C4.0-1 and C4.0-2.
C4.3.2.1 Noble Gases f
For dose estimates, simplified dose calculations based on the assumptions in l
C4.2.2.1 and operational source term data are presented below.
Updated operational source term data shall be used to revise these calculations as l
necessary. These calculations further assume that the annual average dispersion parameter is used and that Xenon-133 contributes 61% of the gamma air dose and 54%'of the beta air dose.
3.47E-_10[hlXe-133 (I'}
-D
=
7 I
D. = 1.03E 09 [hl.he-133 (1.06) a where:
I (3.17E-8)(353) (X/Q), derived from equation presented in 3.47E-10
=
Section 3.1.2.1.
(3.17E-08) (1050) (X/Q), derived from equation presented in 1.03E-09
=
Section 3.1.2.1.
X/Q
= 3.1E-05 sec/m', as defined in Section C2.2.2
[h}Xe-133 the total Xenon-133 activity released in pCi 1.64 = factor-derived _from the assumption that 61* of the gamma air dose is f
contributed by Xe-133.
1.85 = factor derived from the assumption that 54% of the beta air dose is i
contributed by.. Xe-133.
t C4.3.2.2
.nadiciodines, Particulates, and Other Radionuclides with i
T 1/2 ) 8 days j
6 For dose estimates, simplified dose esiculations based on the assumptions in l
C4.2.2.2 and operational source term o u are presented below.
Updated l
operational source term data shall be used to revise these calculations as necessary. These calculations further assume that the annual averap dispersion / deposition parameters are used and that 82". of the dose-results
__ l from H-3 ingested by the maximally exposed individual via the vegetable garden j
pathway. at the controlling location.
The simplified dose-estimate for t
exposure to the thyroid o f a child is:
D=1.2SE-04w(h)H-3(l.221 l
I c
where:
. \\
w = 3.0E-05 = X/Q for vegetable garden pathway, in sec/m from Table C4.0-1 3
for the controlling location (NE sector at 0.5 miles).
I t
[
l C-14 Rev. 30 l/1/91 i
I l _.
i
4~
.[j h,_.[
-(Q)H-3 = the total Tritium activity released in uC1.
1.28E 04 = (3.17E-08)(R {X/Q]) with the appropriate substiturions for-child thyroid vegetable pathway factor, RV [X/Q] for H-3.
l 1
See Section 3.1.2.2.
1.22 = factor derived from the assumption that 82*. of the total' l
inhalation, food'and ground plane pathway dose to the.naximally exposed individual is contributed by H-3 via the vegetable garden pathway.
C4.4 FUEL CYCLE CALCULATIONS As discussed in Section 3.3.5, more than one nuclear power station site may contribute to the doses to be-cor,sidered in accordance with'40CFR190.
The fuel cycle dose assessments for Catawba Nuclear Station must include liquid-and l
gaseous dose contributions f rom McGuire b:uclear Station, which. is located approximately thirty miles NNE of catawba.
For *.his dose assessment, the total body and maximum organ dcse contribt. cions to the maximui, exposed-individual from the combined Catawba and McGuire liquid and gast'us releases are estimated using the following calculations:
I8)+DVB(E )
l' Dyg(T) = DWB(I )
DWB(1 ) + DVB m c
m c
\\
D M0fI M0( c) + DM0(S ) + UMO(S )
+
MO m
m c
where:
DVB(T) = Total estimated fuel cycle whole body dose commitment resulting f rom the combined liquid and gaseous af fluents of Catawba and McGuire dr. ring the calendar year of interest, in mrem.
D"O(T) = T tal estimated fuel cycle maximum organ dose commitment result-ing from the combined liquid and gaseous ef fluents of Catawea and McGuire during the calendar year of interest, in mrem.
C4.a 1 Liquid Effluents i=
[
Liquid pathway dose estimates-are based-on_ values and assumptions presented in l
Sections D4. 3.1. and C4.3.1.
Operational source terms shall be used to update these simplified calculations as necessary.
C4.4.1.1 McGuire's Liquid Contributions Based on operational nistory, the Catawba fuel cycle maximum exposed individual
~
whole body dose resulting frem McGuire liquid effluent releases (DWB(
m estimated using the simplified dose calculation given below:
t) (
} ( Cs-134 +
Cs-137 l
D t
VB m i
C-15 Rev. 30 U l/91 l
a t
l
~
f
- where:
7.66E+05 = 1.14E+05 ( U
+U x BFI) ( DF
)( 1.30 )
ait aw af where:
1.14E+05 = ( 1.0E+06 pCi/uci x 1.0E+03 ml/kg ) i ' 8760 hr/yr )
U,
= 730 t/yr, Adult water consumption U,f = 21 kg/yr, Adult fish consumption i
BF = 2.00E+03, Bioaccumulation factor for Cesium (Table 3.1-1) g DF
= 1.21E-04, Adult total body ingestion dose factor for ait Cs-134 (Table 3.1-2) 1.30 = Factor derived f rom the assu:.iption that 77% of the dose is derived from Cs-134 and Cs-137 or 100% / 77% = 1.30 l
where:
i F =f/F g
where:
J
{.{
f = McGuire's liquid radwaste flow, in gpm x
Fa 1.97E+06 gpm, the average. flow past Lake Wylie Dam where:
and T = 8760 hours0.101 days <br />2.433 hours <br />0.0145 weeks <br />0.00333 months <br />, the time period of time ovar which C g
Cs-134 Cs-137 F are averaged.
g e average c n entrati n f Cs-134!in M Guir 's undiluted C
=
Cs-134 effluent, in uCi/ml, during the calendar year of interest'.
C
- *#*#*E" ' " *"
- ~
Cs-137 effluent, in uC1/m1, during the calendar year of interest.
0.59 = The ratio of the adult total body ingestion dose factors for Cs-134 and Cs-137 or 7.14E-05 / 1.21E-04 = 0.59 Based on operational history, the Catawba fuel cycle maximum exposed individual caximum organ dose (Adult-GI-LLI).resulting from McGuire's liquid effluent releases fD!!O( m)) is astimated using the simplified dose calculation given below:
(
)
DM0( m t
E Nb - 95 j'
where:
-1.92E+06-= ( 1.14E+05) ( U, + U,g x BF )
(DFg) ( 1.27 )
g C-16 Rev. 30 1/1/91-1
4 where:
rN i
1.14E+05 = ( 1.0E+06 pCi/uCi x 1.0E+03 ml/kg ) /( 8760 hr/yr )
U, _= 730 t/yr, adult water consumption-U,g = 21 kg/yr, adult fish consumption BF = 3.00E+04, Dioaccumulation factor for Nb (Table 3.1-1)'
t DF,g = 2.10E-05, adult GI-LLI ingestion dose Isctor for Nb-95 (Table 3.1-2) 1.27 = Factor derived from the assumpt' ion that 79% of the adult GI-LLI dose is from Nb-95 or 100% / 79% = 1.27
- where:
F = f-/ F g
1 L
where:
l-f = McGuire's liquid radweste flow, in gpm F = 1.97E+06 gpm, the average flow past Lake Wylie Dam
['
-where:
s T = 8760 hours0.101 days <br />2.433 hours <br />0.0145 weeks <br />0.00333 months <br />, the time period of time over_which CNb-95.and Fg are g
averaged.
L-C e average ncentrati n' b-5 in.McGuire's undiluted Nb-95 effluent, in uCi/ml, during the calendar tear of interest.
C4. 4.1. 2 Catawba's Liquid Contribution 1 Based on operational history, the Catawba fuel. cycle maximum exposed individual
[
whole body dose resulting from Catawba's liquid effluent releases (DWB ( c s
i estimated'using the simplified dose calculation given below:
I
+ 0.59 CCs-137 )
WB c) = ( 6.38E+05 ) (Jg) (Tt ) (CCs-134 where:
6.38E+05 = 1.14E+05-( U, ~ / D + U,g x BF ) ( DF,gg )( I.10 )
L I
l i
l w
C-17 Rev. 30 L/1/91
[
.~f.
____..__,._..._..m vteret
- 14E+0L = ( 1.0E+06 pC1/uC1 x 1.0E'r03 ml/kg') / ( 8760 hr/yr )
U, 730 t/yr, Adult water consumption
=
D" =
37.7, dilution factor from the near field area to the nearest potable water intake (Rock 11111 Water-Intake) t.,g = 21 kg/yr, Adult fish consumption 2.00E+03 Bioaccumu14 tion factor for ;'esium (Table 3.1-1)
BF
=
g DT,gg = 1.21E-04. Adult total body ingestion dose factor for Cr +34 (Tablw 3.1 2) 1.10 = Tactor derived from the assumption that 91* of the done is derived from Cs-134 and Cs-137 or 100% / 91*. = 1.10 and where:
T =(f)(o)/tT+f) g where:
f=
Catawbt's liquid radwaste flow, in gpm
/.
/
N o=
Recirculation factor at equilibrium, 1.027 (See section C2.,2.1)
F=
Catawba's dilution llow, in gpm and where:
T = 8760 hours0.101 days <br />2.433 hours <br />0.0145 weeks <br />0.00333 months <br />, tne time period of time over which CCs-134' Cs'137 ""
g T are e'.hraged.
g The average concentration of Cs-134 in Catawba's undiluted C
=
Cs-134 offluent, in uCi/ml. during the calendar year of interent.
CCs-137 "
' "'*"'## ""I
"'I3 1"
effluent, in uC1/ml, during the calendar year of interest.
0.59 = The
,cio of the adult total body ingestion dose factors for Cs-134 ans' a-137 or 7.14E-05 / 1.2.!E 04 = 0.59 Based on operat~. anal hister'/. the C1twba f uel cycle maximum ev.posnd individual maximum organ dose (Adult, GI-LLI) resulting from Cetawba's liquid offluent releases (D10(l )) is estimated using the simplifieu dose calculation given c
below:
D (1 ) = ( 2.04E+06 ) (F ) (T ) (CNb-95) g t
C-18 Rev. 30 1/1/91 y.
where 2.04E+06 = ( 1.14+0S ) ( U, / D. + U,g x Drg ) (DFdt) (t'35}
where:
1.14E+05 = ( 1.0E+06 pCi/uci x 1.0E+03 ml/kg ) / 8760 hr/yr V,, = 730 t/yr Adult water consumption D, =
37.7, Dilution factor from the near field area to potable water intake.
U,g = 21 kg/yr Adult fish consumption 3.00E+04. Bioaccumulation factor for Niobium (Table 3..-
)
BF =
g Dr
= 2.10E 05, Adult GI-LLI ingesta sn 'Sse f actor for Nb 95 dt (Table 3.1-2) 1.35 = Factor derived f rom the assumption that 74% of adult GI-LLI dose is from Nb-95 ot 100% / 74% = 1.35 where Ft " (f) ( )/CI*f~)
wheret f=
Catawba's liquid radwaste. flow, in gpm o=
Recirculation factor at equilibrium, 1.027 F'=
Catawba's dilution flow, in gpm p
where:
T = 8760 hours0.101 days <br />2.433 hours <br />0.0145 weeks <br />0.00333 months <br />..the time period of time over which C and F are t
%-95 g
ave r a ged.-
C
= The average concentration of Nb-95 in Catawba's undiluted
'Nb - 9 5 -
effluent, in uC1/ml, during the calendar year of interest.
C4.4.2 Gaseous Effluents Airbornd offluent pathway dose estimates are based on the values and assump-tions presented in Sections B4.3.2. and C4.,,.2.
Operttional source term data shall be used to update these calculations as necessary.
O C-19 Rev. 30 1/1/91 b.
C4.4.2.1 McGuire's Gaseous Contribution Based on operational history, the Catawba fuel cycle maximum exposed individual whole body dose resulting from McGuire's gaseous effluent releases (DVB(8,)) is estimated using the simplificd dose calculation given below:
s D fg,) = ( 9.30E-06 ) ( w) ( Q
(
(
yg Xe-133 F
where:
w=
1.50E-07 = (X/Q) for the plume immersion factor pathway factor, in sec/m' which corresponds to a location 5 miles SSW of the McGuire site (See table B4.0 1) s Q
= The total Xe-133 activity released from McGuire during the Xe-133 calendar year of interest, in uCi.
9,32E-06 = ( 3.17E-08 ) ( K [X/Q)
), with appropriate substitutions for 1
whole body exposure in a semi-infinite cicud of Xe-13),
See Section 1.2.1.
S = 0.7 = External radiat, ion shielding factor for individuals.
p 1.43 = The factor derived from the conservative assumption (based on historical data) that 70% of the whole body dose to the maximally
(
exposed individual is contributed by Xe-133.
f s
Based on operational history, the Catawba fuel cycle maximum exposed individual i
maximum organ dose (Adult-GI-LLI) resulting from McGuire's gaseous effluent i
releases (DM0(8,)) is estimated using the simplified dose calculation given j
below:
1 t
s, t
DM0(E ) = ( 7.03E-05) ( w ) ( 0,3) (1.04) m g
where:
l f
w = 1.5E-07 = X/Q for the food and ground plane pathway, in sec/m', for a location 5 miles SSW of the McGuire site (Table B4.0 1) l i
Q,3 The total H-3 activity released from McGuire during the
=
l g
calendar year of interest, in uC1.
l G
R [X/Q] ) with appropriate substitutions for f
7.23C 05 m
( 3.17E 08 ) '
V the adult-vegetable garden pathway, R [X/Q} for j
!!-3. See Section 3.1. 2. 2.
l r
C-20 Rev. 23 1/1/91 i
-L
1.04 = The factor derived from the conservative assumption (based on historical data) that 96% of the total inhalation, food and ground i
- plane pathway dose to the maximally exposed individual is contri-buted by H-3 via the vegetable pathway.
i C4.4.2.2 Catawba's Gaseous Contribution l
Based.on operational history, the Catawba fuel cycle maximum exposed individual whole body dose resulting from Catawba's gaseous ef fluent releases (D.g(g )) is g
estimated using the simplified dose calculation given below:
s D.B(8 ) = ( 9.32E-06 ) ( w ) ( QXe-133) (8 ) ( 1.72 )
g c
F where:
w=3.0E05.(X7Q) %r the plume immersion factor pathway factor in i'
sec/m
...ich corresponds to a location 0.5 miles NE of the Catawba site (see Table C4.0-1.)
s Q,,333 = The total Xe-133 activity released from Catawba during the x
calendar year of interest. in uC1.
9_32E-06 = (3.17E-08) (K [X/Q)). with appropriate substitutions for whole 3
body exposure in a semi-infinite cloud of Xc-133.
See Section 1.2.1.
S = 0.7 = External radiation shielding factor for individuals.
p 1.72 = The factor derived from the conse;vative assumption (based on historical data) that 58% of the wnole body dose to the maximally exposed individual-is contributed by Xe-133.
Based on design basis operation, the Catawba fuel cycle maximum exposed individual maximum organ dose (Adult-GI-LLI) resulting from Catawba's gaseous effluent releases (D'M0(8 )) is estimated using the simplified dose calculation 0
given below:
( O -3 ) ( l.01 )
DM0(8 ) * (
3~
'(")
H c
where:
w=
3.0E-05 = X/Q for the food and ground plane pathway in sec/m'. for a location 0.5 miles NE of the Catawba site (see Table Ca.0-1).
O,3 The total H-3 activity released from Catawba during the
=
g calendar year of interest, in uCi.
V ___
7.23E-OS = ( 3.17E-OS ) ( R (X/Q) ) with appropriate substitutions for g
V ___
the adult-vegetable garden pathway factor, R (X/Q) for H-3.
g See Section 3.1.2.2.
t C-21 Rev, 30 1/1/91 t
~
r w
~, -
_.g.,
l..
.. ~.. -...
_. -.. - _ - -. - _ _. -.. - - -. - ~. -... - -..... -..
f l'
1.01 = The factor derived from the assumption that 99% of the total l
inhalation, food and ground plane pathway dose to the maximally j
exposed individual is contrituted by H-3 via the vegetable garden pathway.
l b
I 4
P C-22 Rev. 30 1/1/91
4 No l
C5.n Radiological Environmental Monitoring The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program shall be conducted in accordance with Technical Specification. Section 3/4.12.
t The monitoring program locations and analyses are given in Tables C5.0-1 through C5.0-3 and Figure C5. 0-1.
The laboratory performing the radiological environmental analyses shall parti-cipate in an interlaboratory comparison program which has been approved by the NRC.
This program is the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) l Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies (crosscheck)
Program, our participation code is CP.
The dates of the land-use census that was used to identify the controlling receptor locations was 06/01/90 - 07/31/90.
i eN f
N~-l1 l
b l
,O C-23 Rcy. 30 l
1/1/01 l
?