ML20081G566
| ML20081G566 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 08/03/1983 |
| From: | Pagano F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20079F180 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-83-343, RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 NUDOCS 8311070126 | |
| Download: ML20081G566 (5) | |
Text
-
Ed Williams, IE T
((s5* "$g,((g b
o UNITED STATES g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7. !~ ], f gg j
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
,r August 3, 1983 r-9 t'EMORANDUM FOR:
Dennis M.m Crutchfield,. Chief Operating. Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing, NRR FROM:
Frank G.. Pagano, Chief Emergency. Preparedness Branch Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response, IE
SUBJECT:
EMERGEt(C,(OPERATIONS FACILITIES REVIEW IO This is in response (to t$inemorandum from the Director, Division of Licensing (K) to the Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response t 2:ted July 6,1983 with regard to revieps of Emergency Operations Facilities (EOFs).
'lithregardtotheproposeMleitertoapplicants/licenseeswhoseE0Fsmeetthe
- quirements of Table 1, Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737 regarding habitability and location, we have enclosed a revised letter we would suggest be sent by the appiapriate DL Branch Chfdf as Enclosure 1.
Nsed on our review, a list of 31 applicants / licensees has been developed which alieve meet the requirements of Table 1 of the Supplement and is enclosed c::
as Enclosure 2.
There ar,e., however, a number of applicants / licensees for which
...is determination cannot be made because we are unable to determine if the
' n.ilation system for' thei'r primary EOF can be isolated.
This list of seven
- Nicants/ licensees
- ;.is given in Enclosure 3.
It is requested that you obtain-
-his information from' these licensees / applicants in order for us to complete
.ur review and develo'p a revised list.-
In addition, there are five applicants /
Ib-l'?.-
w, 831[1070126830818 0 $3-343 PDR
Dennis M. Crutchfield ~
licensees who are in the process of changing their position with regard to the habitability and location of their EOFs ( Comanche Peak, Fitzpatrick, Millstone, Nine Mile Point, and Oyster Creek). When these applicants / licensees have been evaluated we will advise you of the results.
AblC h
rank G. Pagano, Chief Emergency Preparedness Branch Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response, IE
Enclosures:
1.
Draft Letter to Applicants / Licensees 2.
List of-E0Fs that meet Requirements of Table 1 of Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737 3.
List of Applicants / Licensees where Ventilation Isolation of Primary E0F is Unknown
' O cc w/ enclosures:
R. C. DeYoung, IE S. A. Schwartz, IE I
F.G. Pagano, IE C.R. Van Niel, IE E. Williams, IE E. L. Jordan, IE F. L ntor, IE D. G. Eisenhut, NRR W. A. Paulson, NRR s
N r
DRAFT DocketNos(s).:
Licensee / Applicant Address
Dear:
This letter is to advise you that the NRC staff has re'f ewed your submittal (s) i dated with regard to the habitability and location of t~ne Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) for
- (Plant Name) to meet the requirements of Table 1 of Supplement I to NUREG-0737.
Our review indicates that your facility complies with these requirements.
Approval of the other features of the EOF and the acceptability of all your other Emergency Response Facilities (ERFs) will be determined during a post-
' mplementation appraisal to be conducted at-(Plant Name)
~
~
i by an NRC team under the direction of the Regional Administrator when your ERFs have been completed.
Sincerely, (Appropriate DL Branch)
Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Re ctor Regulation ENCLOSURE 1
LIST OF APPLICANTS / LICENSEES WHOSE E0F APPEAR TO MEET TABLE 1 0F SUPPLEMENT 1 TO NUREG-0737 t
1.
Braidwood
- 16. Ginna 2.
Big Rock Point 17.
Kewuanee 3.
Brunswich 18.
La Crosse 4.
Byron 19.
La Salle 5.
Calvert Cliffs 20.
Limerick 6.
Catawba 21.
Mc Guire 7.
Crystal River 22.
Midland 8.
D.C. Cook 23.
Palisades 9.
Diablo Canyon 24.
Quad Cities
- 10. Dresden 25.
Robinson 11.
Duane Arnold 26.
St Lucie 12.
Farley 27.
Sequoyah 13.
Fort Calhoun1
' 28.
Shoreham 14.
Fort St. Vrain
- 29. Three Mile Island 15.
Grand Gulf 30.
Wolf Creek 31.
Zimmer s
D 4
l ENCLOSURE 2 s.
s s.
A m
g 1
l l
LIST OF APPLICANTS / LICENSEES WHERE VENTILATION ISOLATION OF THE PRIMARY E0F IS UNKNOWN 1
1.
Beaver Valley
~
2.
Cooper 3.
Hatch 4.
Perry 5.
Seabrook 6.
Susquehanna 7.
Zion i
d.
?
O:
t V-
+
'n f
-i f
r E
l
/
,2
[.
~~
i
. y-
\\
ENCLOSURE'3 ll
~
s r-,
,. -- --.