ML20081B009
| ML20081B009 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 02/01/1984 |
| From: | Karr J STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20081A941 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8403060445 | |
| Download: ML20081B009 (17) | |
Text
-
)
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. Box 2325 BOSTON. M ASSACHUSETTS O2107
/FPlfCIPAL STAFF v/_-A- ' gp-c.m-
'3/Rh I';.
h/Ri
-:; e c. ; ~~
[3;
- {4 [
Olh Et(F h ;T,'_-
Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III February 1, 1984 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #84-2-1 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 CIO WEEKLY REPORT NO. 33 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 The Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) Weekly Report No. 33 for the period January 23, 1984 through January 27, 1984, is enclosed.
This report includes a summary of CIO activities for the week and open Items, NIRs, and Hold Points.
Karr 10 Program Manager Enclosures JEK/nl cc:
JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DLQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)
RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, SWEC RGBurns, SWEC APAmoruso, SWEC EB 6$
8403060445 840301 PD't ADOCK 05000329 C
. Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
- CIO -
WEEKLY REPORT NUMBER 33 PERIOD - January 23, 1984 through January 27, 1984 Contents Page I. Overview...................................... 1 II. Activity Summary.............................
2 III. Activity Details.............................
2 IV. General
.......................................-5 V. Attachments..................................
6 A.
CIO Item Summary B.
Hold Point Summary C.
Nonconformance Identification Report (NIR) Summary D.
Meeting Summary VI. Exhibits 1.
FCR/FCN Resolution Program Release Status.
k 1
T
~
CIO REPORT NUMBER 33 I.
OVERVIEW During this reporting period, CPCo initiated the Status Assessment Print (SAP) program for status assessment and the Work Print (WP) program for other activities (i.e. Quality Verif.ication Program
[QVP]). CIO activities were primarily an overview and evaluation of the SAP /WP programs. CIO witnessed both " dry runs" and formal implementation and concluded that activities were in compliance with the governing procedures (FPD-1.000, FPD-3.000 and FPD-7.500).
Tight control was maintained over document issue and all documents are being verified against the appropriate register prior to being released to users. CIO also continued monitoring two related activities in the Field Document Control Center (FDCC-Station 59).
The first was the continued servicing of the Field Document Control Stations for the remedial soils program. The second was the ongoing process of clearing " exception" documents. Exception de:uments are those identified during previous reviews which required corrections that could not be made prior to completion of Phese III (Register Reconciliation).
These documents were identified on exception lists and recalled.from the field stations. FDCC is now in the process of correcting the documents and closing out the exception lists.
Other CIO activities for this period included:
Review of Phase I and II (FCR/FCN Resolution and Processing) for the electrical discipline Planning for Phase I and II of the mechanical discipline
JOB NO. 14509 Page 2 of 6 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 33 Evaluation of the Exception List processing for the civil discipline Plannirg for evaluation of the CPCo audit program i
Attendance at various site meetings CIO actions to close out open items and NIRs as responses are received II. ACTIVITY SUPNARY A.
Phase I and II reviews of the electrical FCR/FCNs B.
Attendance at Construction Training classes i
C.
Evaluation of CPCo processing of exception lists in the civil discipline i
D.
Preparations for review of Construction Training Records for the following teams: No. 24, Field Procurement, Field Engineering Staff, and Construc-tion General Services Organization (Ref. NIR-007)
E.
Review of MPQAD audit reports and preparations for i
CIO evaluation of the MPQAD Audit Program III. ACTIVITY DETAILS (Paragraphs correspond to items in Section II)
A.
CIO perfonned sampling inspections of Phase I and II electrical FCR/FCNs. During this inspection, six discrepant items were identified and reported to CPCo l
(NIR-013). Each discrepant item was reviewed and was l
l l
JOB NO. 14309 Page 3 of 6 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 33 not determined to be significant. Additionally, the overall results of this inspection were evaluated and CIO concluded that, based on the result for the electrical discipline and previous CIO reviews of other disciplines, the program for resolution of FCR/FCN problems is functioning adequately and in a controlled manner. CIO therefore released CIO Hold Point Number 011 for the electrical discipline.
This leaves only the mechanical discipline for complete closure of CIO Hold Point Number 011.
B.
CIO personnel attended and evaluated the below listed Construction Training class. The class was conducted j
in an effective manner and in accordance with FPG 2.000 j.
" Training of Construction Personnel". Based on this, CIO evaluation indicates satisfactory performance.
i CLASS Explanation Report Circuit and Raceway Schedule Drawings E-38 Rev. 64 and E-37 Rev. 67 C.
On January 26, 1984, CIO was informed that drawings and specifications which had been on exception lists during the Phase III review of Field Document Control Stations 8,19,13, 24 and 64 were being corrected and issued to to,',e stations. The CPCo plan for FCR/FCN and Document Control issued on January 16, 1984 in response to CIO 1
1
JOB NO. 14509 Page 4 of 6 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 33 Item Number 043 had included this activity and CIO had determined at that time that an in-process evaluation of performance was warranted.
The evaluation was performed on January 27, 1984 at FDCC and the affected stations covering the following characteristics: Document Distribution, Attachments (FCR/FCNs), Revision Level Control, Station Control, Station Segregation Control, and Register Update.
FDCC and the field stations were found to be conducting their activities in a controlled manner and in compliance with the governing procedures (FPD-1.000 and FPD-3.000).
CIO concludes the activity is proceeding satisfactorily.
D.
In preparation for review of Construction Training Records, CIO has prepared' sampling plans to review those teams as identified on NIR-007. This activity is scheduled for the week of January 30, 1984.
E.
Plans and checklists have been completed for CIO evaluation of the MPQAD Audit Program which will commence on January 30, 1984. The evaluation will encompass the following:
Programmatic evaluation Training / certification of auditors Evaluation of audits performed, corrective action and closeouts, in 1983 9
JOB NO. 14509 Page 5 of 6 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 33 Evaluation of audits performed prior to 1983 and corrective action taken Evaluation of audits performed of Document Control IV. GENERAL A.
Mr. R. Babbit, Quality Systems Division, was on site during the week for the pu'rpose of revising CIO Quality Control Instructions.
B.
The Stone & Webster Remedial Soils Assessment Team reported in their Weekly Report Number 65 that CIO would follow several minor comments by Mr. E. Doherty of Stone & Webster's Engineering Assurance (EA) Division on procedures for FCR/FCN processing.
Mr. Doherty had previously visited the site on October 31, 1983 and November 1, 1983 to evaluate the cause of problems and cor-rective actions regarding the Stop Work Orders for FCR/FCNs. He had found the plan for corrective action satisfactory. Mr. Doherty returned to review the implementation of corrective actions on December 13, 1983. Five contents resulted from this visit. These comments / concerns were not substantial consisting of suggestions, editorial questions and items of a housekeeping nature which did not affect the adequacy of the current issue of the procedures.
These ct.1ments were presented to the lead'MPQAD representative at an exit meeting and transmitted to BPCo with a request that the comments be reviewed, responded to, or clarified.
The BPCo j
responses were reviewed by CIO and Mr. Doherty and the clarifi-cations and actions to be taken were considered by CIO, after a i
6 w
JOB NO. 14509 Page 6 of 6 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 33 i
review of the procedures, to be satisfactory. This completes Mr. Doherty's review and the matter is considered closed.
C.
A chart showing current status of releases in the FCR/FCN Resolution Program is included as_ Exhibit 1 to this report.
D.
The signed affidavit and resume for Mr. A. J. Benecchi has been sent to Mr. J. J. Harrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn, Illinois.
Mr. Benecchi has been assigned as the Administrative Assistant on the CIO Senior Overylew Committee.
E.
CIO personnel staffing remained at 29 for this reporting period.
No changes in staff occurred.
V.
ATTACHMENTS A. - CIO Item Summary B. - CIO Hold Point Summary C. - CIO NIR Summary D. - Meeting Summary l
' STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
1.
<(]identifieschangesfrompreviousreport CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 2.
Closed items will be identified in the report for the MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT week of closure and dropped from further reporting 4
CIO ITEM SUP91ARY Classifi-No.
scripu on Open CPCo Response Closed cation iDocument/Date Document /Date Document /Date ds 030 Tracked Need to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5 Action Verification Program - MPQAD/SMO 7/18/83 032 Tracked NIR 006 issued on October 27, 1983, Report No. 20 Action to address administrative discrepan-10/31/83 cies in the Construction Training Records of Teams 5', 6, 8, 9. 12, 13 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26 (27/28) 29, i
30, 31, 32/33 and BHO staff.
033 Tracked NIR 007 issued on November 7, 1963 Report No. 21 l
Action to address administrative discrepan-11/08/83 cies in the Construction Training Records for Teams No. 24, Field Pro-curement, Subcontractor Management, 1
Field Engineering Staff, and Con-struction General Services Organi-zation.
034 Tracked NIR 008 issued on November 14, 1983 Report No. 22 f[ !f i
t Action to address upgrading Hve training 11/14/83 g 5 level codes in the System Team g <
j Training Matrix.
@ AP r+ g 1
3 l
.EF l
I
C10 ITEM SUPMARY - CONTINUATION SilEET Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed' No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 035 Tracked CIO observed that dielectric iso-Report No. 22 Action lation spacers for galvanic pro-11/14/83 tection of copper pipe to galvanized steel pipe supports were missing ir some areas on the Small Bore (Instru-ment Air) KAC System, drawing FSK-J-l l
30-0220 Sheet 2, Rev. 7.
l
<3:
l 037 Tracked CIO observed that two boards with Report No. 24 J
Action protruding nails lying.In Cable Tray 11/29/83 1AKA019 (Q Tray) hed punctpred the w As revised by cable Jacket of a "Q" cable.
The Report No. 25 1
cable is Q-channel A, 480V, MCC.
12/5/83 NCR C00925 was issued by MPQAD on November 22, 1983. CIO will track this item to assure that corrective action (repair) has becn performed to approved procedures.-
041 Tracked CIO requires CPCo plans and schedules Item Notifi-Infor-for' assuring that current activities cation Report mation relative to the evaluation of Phase 1/6/84 III activities on FCRs/FCNs, vendor drawings and FSKs are completed priac to releasing the emergency diesel g g generators for resumption of instal-p; 5 lation work. Subsequent to review, T <
CIO will determine method of evalu-g y ation.
wo E
CIO ITEM SUPMARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed i
No. -
cation Description, Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks
(
/
CIO Phase III evaluation!of archi-043 Tracked Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Ref. CPCo Action tectural/ civil document control cation Report cation Report letter measures resulted in findings listed 1/6/84 1/17/84 CSM-0719 in the Item Notification (similar 1/16/84 conditions are identified in MPQAD MQAR-DAT-1). CIO requests CPCo's l
plan for addressing the problems noted and for implementing and verifying corrective action on both MQAR-DAT-1 and this item.
/
045 Tracked Response to CIO Item 038 was not item Notifi-
\\
Infor-acceptable. CIO must know what cation Report mation actions will be taken by CPCo to 1/18/84 assure that work is done to Engineering documents and that a reliance on checklists does
~
not develop.
046 Tracked CIO requests placement on distribu-Item Notifi-Infor-tion for documentation and procedures cation Report nation pertinent to the NRC Project Commit-1/18/84 ment Tracking Program, advance notice of related meetings and a schedule 3 p which addresses completion of these events.
{R
=*
a
- ?.
E
CIO ITEM SUPMARY - CONTINUATION SHEET I Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed No, j cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Nemarks i
i 047 Tracked-During a CIO evaluation of document Item Notifi-
.Recommen-control preparedness to implement the cation Report dation requirements of recent revisions to 1/25/84 Procedure FPD-3.000, a number of recommendations were made. CIO was advised that these recommendations would be implemented.
048 Tracked Corrective action needed to rectify Item Notifi-Action an inconsistency between anchor cation Report t
bolt specifications C-305 and C-306.
1/18/84 049 Tracked A CIO review of document control I}em Notifi-Infor-methods resulted in the following cation Report nation observations: (1) Some uncontrolled 1/26/84 specs contained controlled copies of FCRs, FCNs and SCNs;-(2) Controlled documents are being " decontrolled" via a line-out method which is not proceduralized; and (3) CPCo DCC
(
personnel are unaware of the Bechtel i
Ann Arbor method of identgifying document transmittals as either i
controlled or uncontrolled.
? E c %.
n O
8 a
t
?
STONE 8 WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
- 1. d identifies changes from previous report CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
- 2. Closed Hold Points will be identified in the Report for MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT the week of closure and dropped from further reporting C10 HOLD POINT SulHARY
^
Established CPCo Response Lifted Remads No.
Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date 005 CPCo has committed to develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Equipment Verification Program. Program 10/17/83 is required before implementation of Phase II.
007 Evaluation of Management Review of Report No. 19 results of Phase I activities.
10/24/83 Evaluation is required before im-plementation of Phase II 008 NIR 006 was issued on October 27, 1983, Report No. 20 to address discrepancies observed during 10/31/83 the sample inspection of 2,054 Con-struction Training records of 31 members i
of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20,25,26,(27/28),29,30,31,(32/33) and BHO staff.
Corrective action must be completed be-fore any walkdown assessments can be
> g N{
performed by the personnel in question.
g i
M =
n e 3
?
U ll
CIO HOLD POINT StM1ARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Established CPCo Response Lifted No.
Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 009 NIR 007 was issued on November 7, 1983,.,, Report NR. 2}'"
to address discrepancies observed during
'11/07/85 sample inspection of 834 Construction t
Training records of 18 members of Team 24, Field Procurement, Sub-Contractor Management, F. E. staff and Construction General Services Organization.
Corrective action must be completed be-fore any walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
010 NIR 008 has been issued on November 14 Report No. 22 1983 to address upgrading five items 11/13/83 in the System Team Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program.
Corrective action must be completed be-fore any walkdown assessments can be performed by the personnel involved in 4
these training activities.
t 011 Prior to lifting of Stop Work Orders Report No. 23 relating to the FCR/FCN Review and 11/21/83 Resolution Program, CIO has established a Hold Point at the conclusion of Phase
- f II activities to evaluate the adequacy C 1 of MPQAD performance during Phase I and j 7 Phase II activities.
The Hold Point m :o encompasses all the Stop Work Orders E+ $
with the exception of Stop Work Order
~
m No. FSW-36 which has been lifted by MPQAD. This. Hold Point does not apply E
to Phase III.
< a
s.
.i STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
1.
(identifieschangesfrompreviousrepoh CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 2.
Closed NIRs will be identified in the report for the MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT week of closure and dropped from further reporting NONCONFORMANCE. IDENTIFICATION REPORT SLM4ARY No.
Description Issue Date Response Date Closure Date Remarks 8
007 Administrative discrepancies in Construction 11/07/83' Training Records for the following teams:
No. 24 Field Procurement, Subcontractor Management Field Engineering Staff, and Construction General Services Organization.
008 Need to upgrade five training level codes 11/14/83 l
in the System Team Training Matrix.
011 A conflict on the use of R symbols for re '
12/31/83 4
tired FCR/FCNs on architectural drawings.
012 Numerous drawing / specification discrepancies 01/03/84 revealed during Phase III, FCR/FCN CIO review at Drawing Stations 8, 10 and 13.
013 During the review of ' Electrical FCR/FCNs, 01/26/84 a number of items were found nonconforming to FID 2.400.
y R
/g i
014 As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS 1 01/27/84 N
<o =
}
074-0001 FPD 1.000 requirement that a copy 5 $,
of all transmittals for "Q" listed items be n
i transmitted to MPQAD and the Project Supplier
[
Quality Representative was not being satisfied
,o w
5
< - = -
I e
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT WEEKLY MEETING St# MARY Date "9
Attendees Discussion Topic CIO Comments Jan. 25, SAR Design CPCo Historical overview of Bedtel Desip Progra's empliance CIO plans to attend this 1984 Descriptions (Licensing) to SAR (PSAR & FSAR) amnitmmts. The overvier' described meeting to detemine the NRC Commit-BPCo ewmts originating in early 1979 Wiere it was determined need for future CIO ments (Nuclear Div) that a potetial prtblen existed with Soils Desip Progra involvement.
BPCo vs. cemitmmts contained in SARs. An audit was perfonned Design Engrs by CF00, BRb & 88W. From this period throu$i July 1980, CIO 20 audits were perfonned on thsip vs. SAR. Ptieting has bem sche & led by CP00 Feb. 2,1984 to review audit rqxrts for (Impliance to and inpact on FSAR Desip Connitmsts.
Jan. 23 Team Mtgs.
CPCo
- 1) Train additional Team (bality REpresetative as No areas of CIO concern 24, 25, MPQAD stan @y precaution 26, 1984 BPCo
- 2) Rsxt: list (x)ortilnation meeting CIO
- 3) Training of newly assiped teen meters
- 4) Tem meters wre advised that structural steel bracing camot be used for raceway sigports
- 5) Destatusing of hangers fomd satisfactory during reinspection
- 6) Cancems on late deliveries of critical itens i.e. Halm Systen, Isolation Depers Jan. 27, Sub-Contracts CPCo Zack & B8W to prtwide BRb with action plan and restraints CIO will evaluate 88W 1984 Meeting BPCo Wild muld prevet then frun starting work.
training program and R $
k Zack f up and preheat g
Zack - progra established to nonitor fit-@ and W CIO B8W - training matrix and progra approved by PHPD g
=>.
3
- o
EXHIBIT 1 FCR/FCN RESOLUTION PROGRAM RELEASE STATUS DISCIPl.INE PHASE I PHASE II PHASE II PHASE III PHASE III MPQAD MPQAD CIO MPQAD CIO Architectural Complete Complete Complete Complete Completc Civil - Soils Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete t
Civil - Other Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete than soils Electrical Complete Complete Complete NA NA 1-25-84: M910 noti-fled CIO that Phase TF NA u
hb Mechanical Complete II was not ready for
~
1 I
. E I&C Complete Complete Complete NA NA
=
?
g
)
/,