ML20081B006

Forwards Const Implementation Overview Weekly Rept 32 for 840116-20

ML20081B006
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	01/27/1984
From:	Karr J STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20081A941	List: ML20081A963 ML20081A974 ML20081A981 ML20081A993 ML20081A995 ML20081B003 ML20081B006 ML20081B009
References
NUDOCS 8403060444
Download: ML20081B006 (20)

Text

l

__ PRINCIPAL STAFP <

STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INCI g L' j"'

P.O. Box 2325 BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS O2107 hC .-

ENF

$'  ! Afj43 Fii.

Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III January 27, 1984 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #84-1-27 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 CIO WEEKLY REPORT NO. 32 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 N

The Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) Weekly Report No. 32 for the period January 16, 1984 through January 20, 1984, is enclosed.

This report includes a summary of CIO activities for the week and open Items, NIRs, and Hold Points.

/

/.E.Karr CIO Program Manager Enclosures JEK/nl cc:

JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)

DLQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)

RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)

RBKelly, SWEC RGBurns, SWEC APAmoruso, SWEC 8403060444 840301 DR ADOCK 05 gg 1g

N s

Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.

CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW

- CIO -

WEEKLY REPORT NUMBER 32 PERIOD - January 16, 1984 through January 20, 1984 t

I -

Contents Page I. Overview ..................................... 3 II. Activity Summary ............................. 3 III. %ctivity Details ............................. 3 IV. General ...................................... 6 V. Attachments .................................. 7 A. CIO Item Summary B. Hold Point Summary C. Nonconformance Identification Report (NIR) Summary D. Meeting Summary VI. Exhibits

1. FCR/FCN Resolution Program Release Status i

l

-, -. - - ,-~r -,

i CIO REPORT NUMBER 32 i

I. OVERVIEW During this reporting period, principal CIO activities were directed toward an evaluation of CPCo plans and actions to implement corrective action for document control problems identified in CIO Item Number 043.

On January 16, CPCo provided CIO with their plan for completion of

. Phase III (Register Reconciliation) activities, corrective action relative to document control, lifting of CPCo Stop Work Orders 34, 36, 39, 40 and 41 and commencing status assessment and Quality Verification Program (QVP) activities. Major points in the CPCo plan include: ,

• Disestablishing all document control stations except for those necessary to support the Remedial Soils Program (8, 10, 13, 24 and 64) and the Field Document Control Center (Station 59, FDCC).

• Establishing a Status Assessment Print (SAP) Program, 1 controlled by FDCC for verification of documents as they are issued for status assessment.

Establishing a Work Print (WP) program controlled by FDCC for verification of documents as they are issued for work other than that in the remedial soils area.

• Procedure revision to reflect the current approach to document control.

CIO reviewed the CPCo plan and considered it to be an acceptable approach for resolution-of identified problems and commencement of status assessment and QVP.

l r - --- - - , ,- .* e - . , , e ~,m-. r- -

JOB NO. 14509 Page 2 of 7 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEXLY REPORT NO. 32 Based upon this plan, CPCo completed actions necessary to partially

, lift the Stop Work Orders and to activate FDCC to issue SAPS and WPs.

Additionally, Phase III work was completed for Stations 8, 10, 13, 24 and 64 CIO completed our review of these activities and as a result of satisfactory performance lifted Hold Point Number 012. Additionally, CIO commenced an evaluation of FDCC to detemine their readiness to begin issuing SAPS and WPs and to service the remedial soils stations.

Satisfactory completion of this evaluation led to CIO closure of Hold Points 013 and 014. Several recommendations were made to CPCo during this review which will be forwarded to CPCo next week and as a follow-on to this, CIO will evaluate perfomance during the next reporting period when the activity is expected to commence. Additionally, based upon our review, there a're two areas which CIO concluded should be checked during the reactivation of the remedial soils stations. These related to personnel training and document distribution to vendors, and will be referred to the Remedial soils Assessment Team for follow-up.

l Other CIO activities during this period included:

Review of Phase I and II (FCR/FCN Resolution and Processing) for the Instrumentation and Control (I & C) discipline.

Overview of Status Assessment /QVP activities for structural coatings in Module 340.

• Planning for Phase III review of FCR/FCNs in the Electrical and Mechanical disciplines.

I J03 NO. 14509 Page 3 of 7 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 32 Review of MPQAD audit reports in preparation of an evaluation of CPCo Audit Program.

Attendance at various site meetings.

CIO action to close out open Items and NIRs as responses become available.

II. ACTIVITY

SUMMARY

A. Evaluation of FCR/FCN resolution and document control activities.

B. Phase III review of remedial soils vendor documents, field sketches (FSKs), design drawings and specifications and retired (R) documents in the civil discipline.

C. Phase I and II review of I & C documents.

4 D. Construction personnel training record review.

E. Overview of status assessment and QVP activities of Coating inspections of decontaminable concrete and structural steel in Module 340. .

F. MPQAD Audit Report Review.

III. ACTIVITY DETAILS (Paragraphs correspond to items in Section II)-

A. See discussion in Section I of this report.

B. At Remedial Soils Stations (8,10,13, 24 and 64) CIO perfomed a review of Phase III Register Reconciliation of vendor documents, FSKs. design drawings, specifications and the Retirement Documenta-tion Program in the civil discipline. One discrepant item was

~ - , _ .- - - - - - . - - ,

JOB NO. 14509 Page 4 of 7 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 32 identified at Station 8. The discrepancy related to drawing number CLOO4, Rev. 6 which had FCN C3832 attached. Six copies of the same drawing had the correct Change Notice and were signed by the Project Engineer. On one copy of the drawing, the FCN had not been signed by the Project Engineer. After evaluation of overall results, CIO did not consider this item significant and, once it had been corrected, CIO released these five stations for resumption of work by closing CIO Hold Point Number 012.Section I of this report contains further infomation on this topic.

C. CIO performed sampling inspections of Phase I and Phase II Instrumen-tation and Control FCR/FCNs and associated Generic (G) specifications.

, The, reviews showed satisfactory performance. Hold Point Number 011, established for completion of Phase II activities, is now lifted for this discipline.

D. CIO performed a sampling inspection of 689 training records which represented 102. construction personnel prior to their release for status assessment work The records examined were satisfactory and in compliance with FPG-2.000, Rev. 6 " Training of Construction Personnel" (Re: Checklist Number MP-MIS-001E). To date, CIO has reviewed training records representing 245 personnel, found them to be satisfactory and released the personnel to conduct status assessment as activity warrants.

JOB NO. 14509 Page 5 of 7 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 32 i

E. CIO Weekly Report Number 26 documented the release of two personnel to perfom status assessment for Phase I activities.

l Status assessment of decontaminable concrete coating and miscellaneous Q structural steel coatings in Module 340 commenced on December 23, 1983 by these two personnel.

CIO monitored these activities on January 4 and 10, 1984 and observed that the team members were working from appropriate I documents and were checking for proximity violations as defined in Specification C-305 and for construction damage.

Items and areas found to be incomplete are satisfactorily being entered into the Punch List Program.

CIO Weekly Report Number 26 also documented the closure of NIRs 002, 003 and 004, Item 31 snd Hold Point Number 006.

This combination released MPQAD personnel to perform QVP activity. After status assessment, MPQAD began QVP activities in the inspection of decontaminable coatings for concrete.

During the period December 20, 1983 through January 13, 1984, CIO overviewed these activities. The QVP inspections performed 1 were detemined to be in compliance with PQCI C-8.51 Rev. 4 upon review of VIRs C-8.51-3,5,6,7. CIO verified that NCRs, the DIIA form used for Inaccessible Attributes and other pertinent documents were generated as required by the VIR.

One discrepancy was noted by CIO on the completed VIR. The DIIA numbers for the Generic DIIAs were not recorded in Block

= . _ . .- . - .

l l .

JOB NO. 14509 Page 6 of 7 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 32 14 of the IR as required by the PQCI. This was brought to the attention of MPQAD and corrections were made. This item is not considered significant. '

i i MPQAD comenced QVP on structural steel coatings in Module 340K l' on January 13, 1984. CIO performed periodic overviews of this activity and detemined that the inspections were perfomed in

accordance with PQCI 8.50 Rev. 13. MPQAD compliance with the requirements of PQCI 8.50 will be detemined upon the CIO review of the completed Inspection Reports.

l ,

During the above reviews, CIO also verified through the review of Training Records that the specific personnel assigned to

! perfom QVP were trained and certified to perfom Q'VP to PQCI C-8.51. .

F. CIO has been placed on distribution of MPQAD Audit Reports. -In addition to the activity reported in Weekly Report 31, reviews of these are also being conducted in preparation for an evaluation of the MPQAD Audit Program.

IV. GENERAL-A. CIO report incorrectly stated.the number of personnel who had been released for status assessment. Figures in this report are correct. 1 i

B.- A chart showing current status of releases in the FCR/FCN Resolution ~ '

Program is included as exhibit I to this report..

,w+m = w-w w- - - - -m*my- --+

JOB NO. 14509 Page 7 of 7 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER FLANT WEEKLY REPORT NO. 32 V. ATTACHMENTS l

A. - CIO Item Sumary B. - CIO Hold Point Sumary C. - CIO NIR Summary ^

D. - Meeting Summary i

o e

d r ,--.,y -,._, .- ,, .-- . +.v- , v- --e. , -, r.-- - - .,v,-e--,

STONE 8 WE8 STER MICHIGAN, INC. NOTES: 1. Q identifies changes from previous report ,

CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW

2. Closed items will be identified in the report for the MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT 1 week of closure and dropped from further reporting I '

CIO ITEM SUPWARY -

No. Classifi- scription Open CPCo Response Closed

cation i Document /Date Document /Date Remads Document /Date

~

030 Tracked Need to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5 ~

Action Verification Program - MPQAD/SMO 7/18/83 032 Tracked NIR 006 issued on October 27, 1983, Report No. 20 Action to address administrative discrepan- 10/31/83 cies in the Construction Training Records of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9. 12, 13, .

16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26 (27/28) 29,

! 30, 31, 32/33 and BHO staff.

033 Tracked NIR 007 issued on November 7, 1983, Report No. 21 Action to address administrative discrepan- 11/08/83 -

cies in the Construction Training i Records for Teams No. 24 Field Pro-curement, Subcontractor Management. -

Field Engineering Staff, and Con-struction General Services Organi-zation. -

> c j

034 Tracked Action NIR 008 issued on November 14, 1983 to address upgrading five training Report No. 22 11/14/83 h

g7

(

level codes in the System Team g ,

Training Matrix. gg

'.s > h I

~

h eene CIO ITEM SUMARY - CONTINUATION SHEET '

Classifi- Open CPCo Response Closed No. cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks

, 035 Tracked CIO observed that dielectric iso- Report No. 22 l Action lation spacers for galvanic pro- .11/14/83 i

tection of copper pipe to galvanized steel pipe supports were missing in some. areas on the Small Bore (Instru- -

ment Air) KAC System, drawing FSK-J- ~

30-0220 Sheet 2 Rev. 7. -

036 Tracked At a meeting of Teams 26 and 27 Report No. 24 Letter No. CSC. Item Infor- held on November 22, 1983, the dis- 11/29/83

mation 7134 dated Notification [N continuance of FCNs for "Q" items 1/05/84 Report was discussed. If tnis change-is 1/18/84

' to be implemented, new instructions are required.

t l 037 Tracked CIO observed that two boards with Report No. 24

, Action protruding nafis lying in Cable Tray 11/29/83 1AKA019 (Q Tray) had punctured the As revised by cable jacket of a "Q" cable. The Report No. 25 i

cable is Q-channel A, 480V, MCC. 12/5/83 NCR C00925 was issued by MPQAD on November 22, 1983. CIO will track -

this item to assure that corrective I action (repair) has been performed

! to approved procedures. g y g ?

97 i

! I'

• g i '..

" 4

)

t s

CIO ITEM SUP91ARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Classifi- Open CPCo Response Closed No. cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 038 Tracked CIO reviewed a checklist developed Report No. 26 Letter No. CSC- Item Notifi- Response un-Infor- by Bechtel Field Engineers for use 12/13/83 7134 dated cation Report acceptable. /

mation in conducting Status Assessment to 1/05/84 1/18/84 Refer to N Procedures FPN-7.000, Rev.1. Check- CIO Item 045 list did not include all of the .

l attributes required by the procedure.

041 Tracked CIO requires CPCo plans and schedulet Item Notifi-Infor- for assuring that current activities cation Sheet nation relative.to the evaluation of Phase 1/6/84 III activities on FCRs/FCNs, vendor drawings and FSKs are completed prio "

to releasing the emergency diesel generators for resumption of instal-lation work. Subsequent to review, CIO will determine method of evalu-ation.

042 Tracked Reference correspondence refers to Item Notiff- Copy of train- Item Notifi-the formalization of procedures for cation Sheet inq procedure cation Report %y Infor-mation training CPCo personnel (SMO) who 1/6/84 1/06/84 1/19/84 -

l will be performing tasks relative l to the CCP. CIO requests these pro- l cedures for review and evaluation. ,

. M*

Et d n

!! =

58

~ .t q

?*

M

t l

CIO ITEM StMtARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Classifi- Open CPCo Response Closed

No. ' cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks ,

043 Tracked CIO Phase III evaluation of archi- Item Notifi- Item Notifi- Ref. CPCo Action techural/ civil document control cation Sheet cation Sheet letter measures resulted in findings listed .1/6/84 1/17/84 CSM-0719

.in the Item Notification (similar 1/16/84 conditions are identified in MPQAD MQAR-DAT-1). CIO requests CPCo's 4

plan for addressing the problems noted and for implementing and i verifying corrective action on both

, MQAR-DAT-1 and this item. ,

! 044 Tracked Pursuant to the referenced meeting Item Notifi- Item Notifi- Item Notifi-Infor- it is requested that CIO be pro- cation Sheet cation Report cation Report i j mation vided copies of the reports issued by TERA Corporation for their 1/9/84 1/13/84 1/19/84 j;

}

j activities related to design of the j Midland Nuclear Plant. p N

l 045 Tracked Response to CIO Item 038 was not Item Notifi-Infor- acceptable. CIO must know what cation Report actions will be taken by CPCo to

! mation 1/18/84' assure that work is done to Engineering documents and that i a reliance on checklists does > c l not develop. ((

! 7 m

i 8

" 3 l f U

t CIO ITEM SIMMRY - CONTINUATION SHEET ~

Classifi- Open CPCo Response Closed No. cation ' Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 046 Tracked CIO requests placement on distribu- Item Notifi-Infor- tion for documentation and procedures cation Report mation pertinent to the NRC Project Commit- 1/18/84 ment Tracking Program, advance notice of related meetings and a schedule -

which addresses completion of these events. -

[ .

048 Tracked Corrective action needed to rectify Item Notifi-Action an inconsistency between anchor cation Report bolt specifications C-305 an$.C-306. ' g1/18/,84 I

5%

9 :7

!!! =

E O8

>}

STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC. NOTES: 1. ( identifies changes from previous report -

CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW

2. Closed Hold Points will be identified in the Report for ,

MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT the week of closure and dropped from further reporting  !

I' C10 HOLD POINT SLMtARY No. Description Established CPCo Response Lifted Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remads 005 CPCo has committed to. develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Equipment Verification Program. Program 10/17/83 is required before implementation of .

Phase 11. j.

007 Evaluation of Management Review of Report No. 19

results of Phase I activities. 10/24/83

Evaluation is required before im-

- plementation of Phase 11 <

4 008 NIR 006 was issued on October 27, 1983, Report No. 20 to address discrepancies observed during 10/31/83

, the sample inspection of 2,054 Con-

struction Training records of 31 members of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20,25,26,(27/28),29,30,31,(32/33) and BHO staff. ~

Corrective action must be completed be- .

j fore any walkdown assessments can be g performed by the personnel in question. F ,

g R.

M i

$ n

1. 1

= $

5 i

l d

t .

CIO HOLD POINT SUPMARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Established CPCo Response Lifted No. Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 009 NIR 007 was issued on November 7, 1983, Report No. 21 to address discrepancies observed during 11/07/83 sample inspection of 834 Construction l Training records of 18 members of Team

24. Fle M Procurement, Sub-Contractor Management, F. E. staff and Construction General Services Organization.' '- ,

Corrective action must be completed be-fore any walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.

,e 010 NIR 008 has been issued on November 14 Report No. 22 1983 to address upgrading five items 11/13/83 in the System Team Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program.

Corrective action must be completed be-fore any walkdown assessments can be perfonned by the personnel involved in these training activities.

v.

011 Prior to lifting of Stop Work Orders Report No. 23 relating to the FCR/FCN Review and 11/21/83 Resolution Program. CIO has estabilshed a Hold Point at the conclusion of Phase II activities to evaluate the adequacy of MPQAD performance during Phase I and N5 X

Phase II activities. The Hold Point -

g<

f encompasses all the Stop Work Orders @ y with the exception of Stop Work Order .s 8

' No. FSW-36 which has been lifted by A MPQAD. This Hold Point does not apply =

to Phase III. ,o M

" CIO HOLD POINT SUMARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Established .CPCo Response Lifted No. Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date .

Remarks 012 Prior to issue of documentation lifting Hold Point Hold Point Hold Point the CPCo Stop Work Order relating to Notification Notification Notification civil discipline - Soils (Stations 8, Report 1/10/84 Report 1/17/84 Report 1/19/84

- 10, 13, 24 and 64), C10 has established a Hold point at the conclusion of CPCo -

activities for Phase III resolution of .

FCRs/FCNs to evaluate the adequacy of MPQAD perfomance during Phase. III ..

activities. .

i 013 Prior to issue of documentation lifting Hold Point Hold Point Hold Point Ref. CPCo the CPCo Stop Work Order relating to Notification Notification Notification letter CSM-O'719 civil discipline - (other than Stations Report 1/10/84 Report 1/17/84 Report 1/20/84 1/16/84 8,10,13, 24 and 64)', CIO has ,-

tablished a Hold Point at the coaclusion of CPCo activities for Phase III reso-lution of FCRs/FCNs to evaluate the [N adequacy of MPQAD performance during Phase III activities.

l

~

014 Prior to issue of documentation lifting Hold Point Hold Point Hold Point .Ref. CPCo the CPCo Stop Work Order relating to Notification Notification Notification letter CSM-0719 architectural discipline (other than Report 1/10/84 Report 1/20/84 Report 1/20/84 1/16/84 Stations 14, 55, 48A, 488 and 480), C10 i

has established a Hold Point at the i

conclusion of CPCo activities for Phase it E III resolution of FCRs/FCNs to evaluate i;T  %

the adequacy of MPQAD perfomance during i Phase III activities. 9- 7 R ,

o e r+ 0 1

N i

O i

rY l

\_ ______ -_ __ _-.

STONE & WEBSTER MICHiliAN, INC. NOTES: 1. (identifieschangesfrompreviousreport -

CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW

2. Closed NIRs will be identified in the report for the

.MIOLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT week of closure and dropped from further reporting NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT StM1ARY No. Description Issue Date Response Date Closure Date Remarks .

006 Administrative discrepancles in Construction 10/28/83 .01/20/84 01/20/84 Corrective Action

. Training Records involving CCP Teams. verified through CIO evaluations

[

007 Administrative discrepancies in Construction 11/07/83 Training Records for the following teams; No. 24, Field Procurement, Subcontractor

• Management. Field Engineering Staff, and Construction General Services Organization.

Needtoupgradefivetraininglevelcodesin l 008 11/14/83

- the System Team Training Matrix.

011 A conflict on the use of R symbols for re 12/31/83 tired FCR/FCNs on architectural drawings.

012 . Numerous drawing / specification descrepanc'es 01/03/84

. revealed during Phase III, FCR/FCN CIO review at Drawing Stations 8, 10 and 13. .

i d

R-l EE a 2'

< g C

1 i

i

! M i

STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC. .

CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT WEEKLY MEETING

SUMMARY

Date N{'f;"9 Attendees Discussion Topic CIO Comments Jan. 18, FCR/FCN CPCo Discussion on CIO Hold Points 013, 014 and No areas of CIO concern 1984 Review BPCo Open Items. Status of CIO review of Phase I MPQAD and Phase II in the Civil discipline S&W CIO Established CIO schedule for review of the Reconciliation Register of Soils Stations .

8, 10, 13, 24, and 64 Jan. 19, Review of CPCo .

Established CIO plan for review of Reconcili- No areas of CIO concern l 1984 documentatior BPCo ation Register Phase III at Soils Stations l Soils Sta- MPQAD 8, 10, 13, 24, 8 64 I tions 8 S&W CIO Discussed CIO plans for evaluation of Sta. S9 13-24-64 Jan. 20 Review of CPCo Established CIO plans for review of I & C No areas of CIO concern 1984 Phase I & II BPCo FCR/FCNs Phase I and II I & C FCR/ MPQAD Discussed results of CIO evaluation of FCNs S&W CIO Station 59 i Sta. 59  !

evaluation '

Jan. 16 Team utgs.

NE CPCo 1) Discussion of Restraint Items No areas of CIO concern C 9E 17, 20, BPCo 2) Monitoring of Status Assessment 9 ;T 1984 MPQAD Scheduling 2 ,,

S&W CIO 3) Assignment and training of 40 g@

additional members assigned to a g Support Area Teams

4) Administrative responsibilities !F

5) Discussion on Diesel Generator F.0. -

I etnrano tank enatings R;

EXHIBIT 1 .

FCR/FCN RESOLUTION PROGRAM RELEASE STATUS DISCIPLINE PHASE I PHASE II PHASE II PHASE III PHASE III MPQAD MPQAD CIO MPQAD CIO Architectural Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Civil - Soils Complete Complete Complete Caplete Complete Civil - Other Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete than soils Electrical Complete Complete _.

Mechanical Complete Complete N

@5 P*

"5 8

I&C Complete Complete Complete

.= ,

M

__-_____ ____ _ _ _ ___ __ -_ - __-_