Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: 05000267/LER-1983-009, Forwards LER 83-009/01T-0.Detailed Event Analysis Encl, 05000267/LER-1983-009-01, /01T-0:on 830223,four Masonry Walls Found to Have Inadequate Structural Strength to Withstand Design Criteria Load Combination.Caused by Lack of Dur-O-Wall.Mod Reinforcing Walls W/Steel Bar Straps Completed, ML20079H542, ML20080G208, ML20080H068, ML20082K457, ML20093G129, ML20108F438, ML20132G022, ML20141K274
|
MONTHYEARML20028E9731982-12-23023 December 1982 Notifies That Response to 821119 Request for Addl Info on Masonry Block Walls Will Be Delayed Until 830114 Project stage: Request 05000267/LER-1983-009, Forwards LER 83-009/01T-0.Detailed Event Analysis Encl1983-03-0909 March 1983 Forwards LER 83-009/01T-0.Detailed Event Analysis Encl Project stage: Other 05000267/LER-1983-009-01, /01T-0:on 830223,four Masonry Walls Found to Have Inadequate Structural Strength to Withstand Design Criteria Load Combination.Caused by Lack of Dur-O-Wall.Mod Reinforcing Walls W/Steel Bar Straps Completed1983-03-0909 March 1983 /01T-0:on 830223,four Masonry Walls Found to Have Inadequate Structural Strength to Withstand Design Criteria Load Combination.Caused by Lack of Dur-O-Wall.Mod Reinforcing Walls W/Steel Bar Straps Completed Project stage: Other ML20080G2081983-09-0606 September 1983 Forwards Response Spectra Curves Used in Reanalysis of Masonry Block Walls,Per Request.Walls Reanalyzed Per IE Bulletin 80-11 for SSE W/Damping Value of 5% Project stage: Other ML20080H0681983-09-16016 September 1983 Masonry Wall Design,Fort St Vrain Nuclear Plant, Technical Evaluation Rept Project stage: Other ML20082K4571983-11-0808 November 1983 Responds to Re IE Bulletin 80-11, Joint Reinforcement in Masonry Walls. Reevaluation Will Be Made of All Class I Masonry Walls Seismically Qualified Considering Dur-o-Wall as Structural Element Project stage: Other ML20079H5421984-01-0606 January 1984 Provides Alternative Acceptance Criteria for Determining Workability of Concrete During Period in Which 1-1/2 H Time Requirement Deleted from Bldg 10 Concrete Spec Project stage: Other ML20093G1291984-07-0606 July 1984 Informs That Util Completed Const Work on 840706 Re Joint Reinforcement in Masonry Walls Per IE Bulletin 80-11.No Structural Credit Taken for Dur-O-Wall in Masonry Block Walls Near safety-related Equipment Project stage: Other ML20108F4381985-03-0101 March 1985 Forwards Sketches Indicating Method Utilized to Reinforce Walls & List of Reworked Walls,Per IE Bulletin 80-11 & Response to NRC 850116 Telcon Questions Project stage: Other ML20132G0221985-07-16016 July 1985 Notifies That Three of Five Unmortared Stacked Block Walls Will Not Be Mortared in Place by 850802,per 850301 Commitment,Due to High Radiation Levels Near Fuel Storage Well.Completion Anticipated by 851231 Project stage: Other ML20141K2701986-01-15015 January 1986 Forwards Sser Based on Review of Util 850301 & 0716 Addl Info Re Compliance W/Ie Bulletin 80-11,Items 2(b) & 3 for safety-related Masonry Walls.Remaining Wall Designs Adequate.Items Fully Implemented Project stage: Approval ML20141K2741986-01-15015 January 1986 Sser Supporting Util 850301 & 0716 Addl Info Re Compliance W/Ie Bulletin 80-11,Items 2(b) & 3 for safety-related Masonry Walls Project stage: Other 1983-09-06
[Table View] |
Text
.
p public Service Company @ OcBomdle I
tG '
2420 W. 26th Avenue, Suite 1000, Denver, CO 80211 0
January 6, 1984 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P.-84004
$ h f{ h
]
J m
Mr. John T. Collins jgggg g Regional Administrator l
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-]
Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011
SUBJECT:
Fort St. Vrain Building 10 Concrete for Floor & Walls
REFERENCE:
NRC Letter dated December 7, 1983 from Mr. E. H. Johnson to Mr. O. R. Lee (G-83423)
Dear Mr. Collins:
This letter is in response to your request to state our alternative acceptance criteria for determining the workability of concrete during the period in which the 1-1/2 hour time requirement was deleted.
PSC RESPONSE When the 1-1/2 hour time limit was deleted from the Building 10 concrete specification, alternate acceptance criteria was specified.
That alternate was that no water could be added to increase the workability of the concrete.
The acceptance criteria for the concrete prior to the deletion of the 1-1/2 hour time limit was specified in the Building 10 Specification 75-J-02 as follows:
1)
The concrete slump shall be between 3 to 5 inches (ACI 309 defines this slump as plastic).
2)
The concrete air entrainment shall be between 3-1/2 to 6-1/2%.
/
$$0*$$oE0 ph
,'i!O 4 e
P-84004 Page 2
,,o 3)L The concrete temperature shall not be less than 40 degrees F nor exceed 90 degrees F.
4)
Discharge of concrete from trucks shall be completed within 90 minutes or before the truck drum has revolved 300 revolutions, whichever comes first.
This same acceptance criteria for the Building 10 concrete, with the exception of item number 4, was u:ed during the period in which the 1-1/2 ~ hour time requirement was deleted.
Therefore it is PSC's position that the workability of the concrete was not affected and sufficient acceptance criteria was used during the time period of the deletion of the 1-1/2 hour time requirement.
If you have any questions on.this item please contact Mr. J. R. Reesy (303) 571-8406.
Very truly yours,
$4Wt4%
H. L. Brey, Manager Nuclear Engineering Division HLB / RAG:pa w.m.
"