ML20078Q285

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 Ses Tsc/Osc Tabletop 3,941012
ML20078Q285
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/12/1994
From:
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20078Q270 List:
References
NUDOCS 9412220052
Download: ML20078Q285 (7)
v • d • e


Text

.. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

WATERFORD-3 STEAM ELECTRIC STATION TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 OCTOBER 12,1994 Approval:

e Plan 6ing Manager Approval:

N/A General Manager Plant Operations Approval:

N/A Vice President Operations 9412220052 941216 PDR ADOCK O$000392 bfl h N0 h

WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 OCTOBER 12,1994 6

4 W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 CUE CARD NO.

2 TO:

All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A

= - _ = - _ - - - -

THIS IS A DRILL DO NOT initiate actione affecting normal plant operations ANNUAL EXERCISE LESSONS LEARNED:

NRC WEAKNESSES: (Refer to Weakness Response Letter W3F1-93-0374)

1. The issuance of Protective Action Recommendations (PARS), the failure to follow applicable procedures for completing notification messagss containing PARS, and the failure to receive the Emergency Coordinator's approval to moosfy previously approved PARS were identified as an exercise weakness.
2. The inability to timely assess the source of the release and implement mitigation strategies was identifled as a weakness.

TSC/OSC IMPROVEMENT ITEMS: (Refer to W3 exercise report and NRC report.)

1. Although plant page announcements were frequently made to update plant personnel on the status of the emergency, plant personnel were not informed of "w identity of the person making the announcement, their emergency position or their emergercy facility. This is also a good practice during "round table" status briefings, especially if personnel from the NRC or other agencies are present.
2. Transfer of responsabilities from the TSC to the EOF could have been performed more i

efficiently, especially transfer of communications.

3. The TSC did not always keep the EOF informed of their activities in a timely manner. For example, the EOF asked at least three times for the status of Containment isolation.

i

4. The OSC HP did an excellent job of keeping informed of plant radiological status, but l

always had to ask for the information. The RCC should do a betterjob of notifying the OSC of changes in conditions.

S. Personnel were not aware of how to react to the problem with the Accountability Keycard Readers. It would have helped if Secunty made an announcement indicating how to proceed.

6. Status boards were not always kept updated. The NRC noted the PARS were not kept current on the dose assessment status boards.
7. There was some confusion relating to computertzed dose assessment results from montioring teams outaide of the plume.

. =m-

WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 OCTOBER 12,1994 W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPEINO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 CUE CARD NO.

2 TO: All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A THIS IS A DRILL

_-- _-____ _____DO NOT initiate actions affecting normal plant operatione ANTICIPATED RESPONSE COMMENTS Participants should be encouraged to ask questions or comment on the issues discussed.

INSTRUCTIONS

1. The Lead Controller will use the Response to the NRC to discuss the NRC Weaknesses in detail,
2. The Lead Controller will use the W3 exercise report and the NRC report to discuss the improvement items in detail.
3. The Lead Controller should also discuss the changes being made to EP 001001 as a result of the recent NRC inspection. Additional indicators are being added to the three barrier General Emergency EALs to clarify how to determine if the cladding barrier has been breached.
4. The Lead Controller may discuss additional improvement items at his discretion.

s

i WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 i

OCTOBER 12,1994 W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 CUE CARD NO.

3 TO:

All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A THISIS A' DRILL DO NOT initiate actione affecting normal plant operationa The following three practice scenarios will be provided to the participants to discuss Protective Action Recommendations:

1. Scenario #1 You have just declared a General Emergency due to a LOCA with cladding damage and i

Containment pressure of 36 psi and IreMig. The wind is from 202 degrees at 3 miles per hour.

2. Scenario #2 A General Emergency was declared due to dose projection calculation as follows:

j TDE CDE EAB 7334 MR 6692 MR 2 miles 611 MR 724 MR 5 miles 105 MR 105 MR 10 miles 56 MR 67MR Wind direction is from 18 degrees at 2 miles per hour.

3. Scenario #3 A General Emergency had been declared 45 minutes ago and the minimum PARS prwided to the offsite agencies. New dose projection information is received as follows:

TDE CDE EAB 14,325 MR 170,402 MR 2 miles 3,539 MR 42,099 MR b miles 1,112 MR 13,231 MR 10 miles 471 MR 5613 MR Wind direction is from 180 degrees at 6.3 miles per hour.

WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 OCTOBER 12,1994 W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 CUE CARD NO.

3 f

TO: All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM: _ Lead Controller T=

N/A THIS IS A DRILL DO NOT initiate actione aNocting normal plant operations l

ANTICIPATED RESPONSE

1. Scenario #1 Participants should rwcommend: Evacuation for A1, B1, C1, D1, A2 & B2 and; Shelter for the rest of the sectors (A3, A4, B3, 84, C2, C3, C4, D2, D3, & D4)
2. Scenario #3 1

Participants should recommend: Evacuation for A1, B1, C1, D1, C2, & D2 and; l

Shelter for the rest of the sectors (A2, A3, A4, B2, 83, B4, C3, C4, D3 & D4)

3. Scenario #3 Participants should recommend: Evacuation for A1, B1, C1, D1, A2, C2, A3 & A4 and; Shelter for the rest of the sectors (B2, B3, B4, C3, C4, D2, D3, & D4)

COMMENTS The scenarios are not related to each other. They are individual sets of ecoditions.

INSTRUCTIONS

1. Provide the conditions for each scenario and instruct the participants to determine the correct PARS.

j

2. Encourage the participants to use F P.'02-052 fm Wese practice scenarios.

1

_____n------------

fASCLEAR OPStAM TRANW8G DEPARTM 1$

i ATTEfBANCE RECORD

'i j

CLASS TITLE: TSC/OSC TABLETOP 83 CLASS NUMBER: J033-094 CYCLE:

N/A INSTRUCTOR: STAFF START DATE-OCTOBER 12,1994 END DATE- ' OCTOBER 12,1994 HOURS:

N/A, I

l NAIAE SOCIAL SECURITY i

LAST FNtST RAI SIGNATURE NURIBER DEPARTRIENT CORIPANY GRADE l

h ZZ784 bb4D Tr ste EOI bOttb IC 1.

2. (dthel hs(Arl

$r

/}/ NN

$V#ffdy /j71 EoT 3." donWm /cbS

}

on 4r 06 41 0A kB

4. A:lle. / ll L Y hl$w dn ? sat 5:~ke<

for' f

M c,6 9's q Odwsh; l

s. 5l L1 Sij L

sor ch h

EOI

6. N,,,b,_) M[rb D

,h

.a NL-M-4330 NS

7. %%. Mas T.n

.s-1 c-M- 0 90 i O 5 for bd Eh k

h' (34-33-00(&

5/C. MA<M Idf s.

h uea Ints 3 4M'O(AW N 6 s h n., Eo E

~

w s.

10. T4EGE TRAV 4

D '#l3-F3EJ M f C.

Eol

11. (AJAlls b.nd 4

d

'4N-7 V-#V5

/Me 6.or

(

ILWil4

/ U.

h YH cad b4) fo.r i

12.

13. /hoa, A 7

[

242 7c,143 L fim.

gar f

14. k)l]I:<

E o fAk>h y3 7-90 Aft 2 TfMG

$df

~

15. (h b d 5 M( h) 472-S(,-d'(SV hk.%J BoS l
16. beh

. 0/*((st) f f) $.l ste 3309

&A-64I

=

ff

~~

f

=.

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINWG DEPARTMENT ATTENDANCE RECORD r

~

CLASS TITLE.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #3 CLASS NUMBER: J033 094 CYCLE-N/A INSTRUCTOR: STAFF START DATE-OCTOBER 12,19i94 END DATE-OCTOBER 12,1994~

HOURS:

N/A NAME SOCIAL. SECURITY LAO FIRST Mi SIGNATURE NUMBER DEPARTMENT COMPANY GRADE

1. l AAffLL NiLCIM, 1H %219bsub' NGdd4/& 3 SL.

ECE I

]hwkbA,.. &.. CL._. N__ d.

into-9uf Rf' EoZ 2.

3.

A L _ Cl;n }-

L.

(0 Y.

Et D '-F-o g - l l ~h A EtP h 0.L f

LlN, M A EWl,l-YJt'-Hvn3 /E.,/ tQr, OopuiN Rems m $/V 431-1,- siiv.2 C.kc~;as-,

for 5.

E.,

CL,-fb(O rz50 wo ws eor s.

7.

Gcp3, Msl La b

$3 3'WYs T* Sws;y do.z-

/

A ?/h., A L T r. N-V[ W

./L Y

+ 7 soz a r-37.n 43 e.

l 9.

l 10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

l

_

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20078Q285&oldid=4389973"