ML20078Q274

3 Ses Tsc/Osc Tabletop 2,940920

ML20078Q274
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	09/20/1994
From:	ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20078Q270	List: ML20078Q268 ML20078Q273 ML20078Q274 ML20078Q285 ML20078Q295 ML20078Q300 ML20078Q302 ML20078Q305 ML20078Q311
References
NUDOCS 9412220050
Download: ML20078Q274 (7)

Text

.

i 1

1 WATERFORD-3 STEAM ELECTRIC STATION TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 SEPTEMBER 20,1994 l

)

i Approval:b EggeincIypnning Manager Approval:

N/A General Manager Plant Operations Approval:

N/A Vice President Operations 9412220050 941216 PDR ADOCK 05000392 l,/!ll )f)[] W'D 0 a

PDR

. c

. ~. -....

WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 SEPTEMBER 20,1994 W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 CUE CARD NO. 2 TO:

All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A THIS IS A DRILL DO NOT initiate actions affecting normal plant operations ANNUAL EXERCISE LESSONS LEARNED:

NRC WEAKNESSES: (Refer to Weakness Response Letter W3F1-93-0374)

1. The issuance of Protective Action Recommendations (PARS), the failure to follow applicable procedures for completing notification messages containing PARS, and the failure to receive the Emergency Coordinator's approval to modify previously approved PARS were loentifled as an exercise weakness.

2. The inability to timely assess the source of the release and implement mitigation strategies was identified as a weakness.

TSC/OSC IMPROVEMENT ITEMS: (Refer to W3 exercise report and NRC report.)

1. Although plant page announcements were frequently made to update plant personnel on the status of the emergency, plant personnel were not informed of the identity of the person making the announcement, their emergency position or their emergency facility. This is also a good procece during "round table" status briefings, especially if personnel from the NRC -

or other agencies are present.

2. Transfer of responsibilities from the TSC to the EOF could have been performed more efficiently, especially transfer of communicatens.

3. The TSC did not always keep the EOF informed of their actMties in a timely manner. For example, the EOF asked at least three times for the status of Containment isolation.

4. The OSC HP did an excellentjob of keeping informed of plant radiological status, but always had to ask for the information. The RCC should do a betterjob of notifying the OSC of changes in conditions.

5. Personnel were not aware of how to react to the problem with the Accountability Keycard Readers. It would have helped if Security made an announcement indicating how to proceed.

6. Status boards were not always kept updated. The NRC noted the PARS were not kept current on the dose assessment status boards.

7. There was some confusion relating to computerized dose assessment results from montioring teams outside of the plume.

n>

- c.. ::

m

---7

WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 J

SEPTEMBER 20,1994 TV3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 CUE CARD NO.

2 TO: All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A

=-

THIS IS A DRILL

- _ _ _.DO NOT initiate actions affecting normal plant operations l

ANTICIPATED RESPONSE i

COMMENTS Participants should be encouraged to ask questions or comment on the issues discussed.

INSTRUCTIONS

1. The Lead Controller will use the Response to the NRC to discuss the NRC Weaknesses in detail.

2. The Lead Controller will use the W3 exercise report and the NRC report to discuss the improvement items in detail.

3. The Lead Controller should also discuss the changes being made to EP-001@1 as a result of the recent NRC inspection. Additional indicators are being added to the three barrier General Emergency EALs to clarify how to determine if the cladding barrier has been breeched.

4. The Lead Controller may discuss additional improvement items at his discretion.

I l

WATERFORD 3 SES-TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 SEPTEMBER 20,1994 W3 SES ESGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD L

DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 CUE CARD NO.

3 TO: ~ All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A i

DO NOT initiate actions affecting normal plant operationa l

The follomns three practice scenarios will be provided to the participants to discuss Protective Action Recommendations:

1. Scenario #1 You have just declared a Gei:eral Emergency due to a LOCA with cladding damage and Containment pressure of 36 psi and increasing. The wind is from 202 degrees at 3 miles per hour.

2. Scenario #2 A General Emergency was dedared due to dose projection calculation as follows:

TDE CDE EAB 7334 MR 8692 MR 2 miles 611 MR 724 MR 5 miles 105 MR 105 MR i

10 miles 56 MR 67 MR i

Wind direction is from 18 degrees at 2 miles per hour.

3. Scenario #3 A General Emergency had been declared 45 minutes ago and the minimum PARS pist,Ged to the offsite agencies. New dose projecilon information is received as follows:

j TDE CDE EAB 14,325 MR 170,402 MR 2 miles 3,539 MR 42,099 MR 5 miles 1,112 MR 13,231 MR 10 miles 471 MR 5613 MR Wind direction is from 180 degrees at 6.3 miles per hour.

- nu,::::

- -

- - - =

=. : = -

- ~ -. -

WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 SEPTEMBER 20,1994 W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD 4

DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 CUE CARD NO.

3 TO:

All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A THIS IS A DRILL DO NOT initiate actions affecting normal plant operations

=_

ANTICIPATED RESPONSE

1. Scenario #1 Participants should recommend: Evacuation for A1, B1, C1, D1, A2 & B2 and; Shelter for the rest of the sectors (A3, A4, B3, B4, C2, C3, C4, D2, D3, & D4)

2. Scenario #2 Participants should recommend: Evacuation for A1, B1, C1, D1, C2, & D2 and; Shelter for the rest of the sectors (A2, A3, A4, B2, 83, B4, C3, C4, D3 & D4)

3. Scenario #3 Participants should recommend: Evacuation for A1, B1, C1, D1, A2, C2, A3 & A4 and; Shelter for the rest of the sectors (B2, 83, B4, C3, C4, D2, D3, & D4)

COMMENTS The scenarios are not related to each other. They are individual sets of conditions.

INSTRUCTIONS

1. Provide the conditions for each scenario and instruct the participants to determine the correct PARS.

1

2. Encourage the participants to use EP-002 052 for these practice scenarios.

_ __ a - r : _ g --.

=

- = - - =

• -~~ -

=

%q NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING DEPARTMENT ATTENDANCE RECORD L;

j.j CLASS TITLE-TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 CLASS NUMBER: J033 CYCLE-N/A INSTRUCTOR: STAFF START DATE:

9/20/94 END DATE-9/20/94 HOURS:

N/A NAME SOCIAL SECURITY LAST FRST Mt SIGNATURE NUMBER DEPARTMENT COMPANY GRADE

%W

1. K;M Jo n O

Cu D. M m -a >.g,g5 u,_

Coz 2Anup/.?bd k

309 3G z V5~9 F W / 6 #~ f W Est

2. 0 0 4 Y -Pt 7 7 9 2-M k-va Cor 3.

04tm % %

e D4vio fe~sem S. kl.J S. Eb, Y3 s-70-7192. M.E~u E G T' 4.

I-- k E o m u E.

583-64-4271 L Ad.=-. E, um Eo1 5.

6. Nkbca g b e n C

6. kt

-J 264 Si23

1. al.ib P,ola das E OI

7. kt GneG L_

2 4t.- YB44 LitMS.aG 601~

8. } cr rom.r R w

my-M go'l3 Sup. 0 y h k E /) T.

9. 6b.54mm F

%4o 439-15-(oo25' A

EoI l

10.

bEllCtew Anenat S ihYw---

'l3l-25~ I 7 o L C tlEinisrit y L~~{J1'

?

bbil-blN b e r. 4 IT+t

[0 f kAN*4 m, at.

M.

11.

12.

1~ough ttATT L.

W

'/Jb-32-GS9S SYJ fa(,-

for IGAlaw&( kActX &

&w

'3$2-L3-ICAv

'rfc

@r

• ~

13.

,f50seh

/88-2-9/sg swarc suc Eoz-i i

14. A)42Kl' l, s/A) E.

RIM LEK T.

V NCD 4. MED AU~Ck'.2L 4 3 e-19-936s e At + c.

E6E 15.

18. %.,m, Q. G.

Q )*> G ' /

S6uGzoo33 mM EOt W

1:

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRANNG DEPARTMENT ATTENDANCE RECORD CLASS TITLE-TSC/OSC TABLETOP #2 CLASS NUMBER: J033 _ CYCLE:

N/A INSTRUCTOR: STAFF START DATE-9/20/94 END DATE-9/20/94 HOURS:

N/A

~

NAME SOCIAL SECURITY

'[

LAST FIRST Mi SIGNATURE NUMBER DEPARTMENT COMPANY GRADE

1. lE DE T.

'IOku I-h

• ?

$bb 'bS' S'l94 SecuaRy eoz 2.

'l 3.

4.

5.

U, t.

7.

8.

9.

10.

i 11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

i 16.

+w

.