ML20078Q273

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 Ses Tsc/Osc Tabletop 1,940525
ML20078Q273
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/25/1994
From:
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20078Q270 List:
References
NUDOCS 9412220049
Download: ML20078Q273 (7)
v • d • e


Text

-_

_--,_y-_,-..,

9 l

WATERFORD-3 STtlAM ELECTRIC STATION TSC/OSC TABLETOP #1 MAY 25,1994 l

l

/;,

Approvalf-Emergency Planning Manager Approval:

N/A General Manager Plant Operations Approval:

N/A Vice President Operations 941222co49 941216

{DR ADOCK 050003G2 q(t?JDoufl

.o-WATERFORD 3 Sr TSC/OSC TABLETOP 01 MA 1994

.4 W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #1 CUE CARD NO.

2 TO:

All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A THIS IS A DRILL DO NOT initiate actions affecting normal plant operations

_____.______ ___________ ___ __ ___________ ____--__ __ = _

ANNUAL EXERCISE LESSONS LEARNED:

NRC WEAKNESSES: (Refer to Weakness Response Letter W3F1-93-0374)

1. The issuance of Protective Action Recommendations (PARS), the failure to follow apphcable procedures for completing notification messages containing PARS, and the failure to receive the Emergency Coordinator's approval to modify previously approved PARS were identified as an exercise weakness.
2. The inability to timely assess the source of the release and implement mitigation strategies was identified as a weakness.

TSC/OSC IMPROVEMENT ITEMS: (Refer to W3 exercise report and NRC report.)

l l

1. Although plant page announcements were frequently made to update plant personnel on the status of the emergency, plant personnel were not informed of the identity of the person making the announcement, their emergency position or their emergency facility. This is also a good practice during "round table" status briefings, especially if personnel from the NRC j

or other agenoes are present.

2. Transfer of responsibilities from the TSC to the EOF could have been performed more efficiently, espeaally transfer of communications.
3. The TSC did not always keep the EOF informed of their activities in a timely manner. For example, the EOF asked at least three times for the status of Containment isolation.
4. The OSC HP did an excellent job of keeping informed of plant radiological status, but always had to ask for the information. The RCC should do a better job of notifying the OSC of changes in conditions.
5. Personnel were not aware of how to react to the problem with the Accountability Keycard Readers. It would have helped if Security made an announcement indicating how to proceed.
6. Status boards were not always kept updated. The NRC noted the PARS were not kept current on the dose assessment status boards.
7. There was some confusion relating to computerized dose assessment results from montioring teams outside of the plume.

l

t, WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP #1 MAY 25,1994 a

W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #1 CUE CARD NO.

2 TO:

All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A THIS IS A DRILL DO NOT initiate actions affecting normal plant operations

= ____ = ____________ ________________________ ____________________________ _________= _______

ANTICIPATED RESPONSE COMMENTS i

Participants should be encouraged to ask questions or comment on the issues discussed.

INSTRUCTIONS

1. The Lead Controller will use the Response to the NRC to discuss the NRC Weaknesses in detail.

l l

2. The Lead Controller will use the W3 exercise report and the NRC report to discuss j

the improvement items in detail.

3. The Lead Controller may discuss additional improvement items at his discretion.

WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP 01 MAY 25,1994 y

W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #1 CUE CARD NO.

3 TO:

All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A THIS IS A DRILL DO NOT initiate actions affecting normal plant operations

= __- ___-_-__ _ - ___ ___________ __ _-_____ _ -__--_

The fo!!owing three practme scenarios will be provided to the participants to discuss Protective Action Recommendations:

1. Scenario #1 You have just declared a General Emergency due to a LOCA with cladding damage and Containment pressure of 36 psi and increasing. The wind is from 202 degrees at 3 miles per hour.
2. Scenano #2 A General Emergency was declared due to dose projechon calculatum as follows:

TDE CDE i

EAB 7334 MR 8692 MR 2 miles 611 MR 724 MR 5 miles 105 MR 105 MR 10 miles 56 MR 67 MR l

Wind direction is from 18 degrees at 2 miles per hour, j

3. Scenario #3 A General Emergency had been declared 45 minutes ago and the minimum PARS provided to the offsite agences. New dose projection information is received as follows:

TDE CDE EAB 14,325 MR 170,402 MR 2 miles 3,53g MR 42,099 MR 5 miles 1,112 MR 13,231 MR 10 miles 471 MR 5613 MR Wind direction is from 200 degrees at 6.3 miles per hour.

o WATERFORD 3 SES TSC/OSC TABLETOP #1 MAY 25,1994 4

W3 SES EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DRILL CUE CARD DRILL TYPE /NO.

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #1 CUE CARD NO.

3 TO:

All Participants TIME:

N/A FROM:

Lead Controller T=

N/A

= ___ ---_- __-__- ______-___

THIS IS A DRILL DO NOT initiate actiona affecting normal plant operations

= --_--

ANTICIPATED RESPONSE

1. Scenario #1 Participants should recommend: Evacuation for A1, B1, C1, D1, A2 & C2 and; Shelter for the rest of the sectors (A3, A4, 82, 83, 84, C3, C4, D2, D3, & D4)
2. Scenario #2 Participants should recommend: Evacuation for A1, B1, C1, D1, C2, & D2 and; Shelter for the rest of the sectors (A2, A3, A4, B2, B3, B4, C3, C4, D3 & D4)
3. Scenario #3 Participants should recommend: Evacuation for A1, B1, C1, D1, A2, C2, A3 & A4 and; Shelter for the rest of the sectors (B2, B3, 84, C3, C4, D2, D3, & D4)

COMMENTS The scenarios are not related to each other. They are individual sets of conditions.

INSTRUCTIONS

1. Provide the conditions for each scenario and instruct the participants to determine the correct PARS.
2. Encourage the participants to use EP-002-052 for these practice scenarios.

J

~

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING DEPARTMENT ATTEWANCE RECORD CLASS TITLE:

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #1 CLASS NUMBER: J033 CYCLE: N/A INSTRUCTOR:

STAFF START DATE: MAY 25, 1994 END DATE: MAY 25, 1994 POURS: N/A NAME SOCIAL SECURITY LAST FIRST MI m f-41GNATURE NUMBER DEPARTMENT COMPANY GRADE bwT 3ne_

I kC AwAL-UnO GL cunwt Ca2 kW *

+*-n siss wis~

c%

o nm n ~,

p bhr,ao.NSosn

v. n-eo-n or pis eA.T.

0'Qosau Sgar C N.h*"

N%-n uo7 bE ' k c' G uN4 bchlesencw Pctskn] Yhit Y

+% 567 SE E rego, Litu.

4A s ad 1

vsi-,s-c<.so sa - meca

/%/,l &J.s w w-A ps-sr.r.,sr

.o w hYP5s>. SK U-ill Yw 3792Wh n,'S L Usa m s hs+-ss -ssi s sw f

o,cmaw. eu a

/ba.)&uA St. A.

1h s>b Z Eb d 4-Il9 9 bbrE M6MT' d4 IdA.

/M wr-M-zt K s-1 L a J i i c.,

L

//4 ff-r,r-oc /w cf.*

32' ea may w <

yath m ma n n'

ac la-Tv &

/ZLW 435-u - 9 i16 SE EoE Modin,A L a h&-20LJ vn-.ct-we Pd EL S w w o u,o t

/>.-( 8, I

Ns Y

va-re-,c1r cor m.

- - + -

^'

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINIM DEPARTMENT ATTEMANCE RECORD CLASS TITLE:

TSC/OSC TABLETOP #1 CLASS NUMBER: J033 CYCLE: N/A INSTRUCTOR:

STAFF START DATE: MAY 25, 1994 END DATE: MAY 25, 1994 HOURS: N/A NAME SOCIAL SECURITY LAST FIRST NI SIGNATURE IM BER DEPARTMENT COMPANY GRADE-M uEt TRo's

[

MPd 973 39 3S,2 7,70(.

4-vra. y Ilo[I Dan:.s 6

@Y

%>'sz 3+9 llca//h disic

  • rdt.1,

/1akSeb 0b.eoJN $

kw hy 435-lG'l$5h

$ 6'ctt 4

.~nkeri asuitwe joe F Ar< W$wa cis >-ir-mq z 'c' rnrcest htOJ. LLbm 3 Y nh '

Abs-Wh7 tot T T^

E0Z~

~

Tecur,'u w,c. >4C %d ac n W Pin a p%

r

$/Mk frtres t&acn-a s n - 4 6 - n ec.

1""'c earn,u sty)l4I\\.$ohwl~b.

Gbkb rdl D V-N -J n C.

At E Uwe k7ok. ?ii.

I b Na +E cl%aFan) M Sh e,'

Abs i

/

10.

f 11.

12.

13.

14.

i 15.

16.

i

^

, _. _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20078Q273&oldid=4389978"