ML20071G419
| ML20071G419 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1976 |
| From: | Fisher G U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT |
| To: | LLOYD HARBOR STUDY GROUP, INC. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20071F735 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-93-375 73-2266, NUDOCS 7903060041 | |
| Download: ML20071G419 (2) | |
Text
.
- w..;.n.r.;~ :. ~x. -
~~
r-
.g,
- a...
'.J. U ; t, t..
- e. a :...,........
- c.......'s.
T...
T 1, 0.......1 c. - d.n...
.~;
r.
.-..s
~.- *.
m 1.luy. 1: arbor S hrly Group. Inc.,
l'etition'.c
[,!. : a,!,c. m,. c..,... :,,.,.7.-
y,
.l car !M t.tlatory C re.1011.c "d
... es o; c.:nc ri e r.,
R e sp c:.. c;.i.e G E O.' G 'r,n
- .s..
1 1 m;' i.1:;h tI n ; Cu.,
5.~. ; '
'r :.-. -- -.
t Inrc:vcr.:.r i
Defcre:
'icGo.ran and Maci:innon, Circuit Judges: Vc.r Pelt *, l'.S. Senior District Judge for the District of Nebrarka.
O R D E F.
This cause came on to be heard on a petition for re ie.. of orders f the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and the Atcr.ic Scf sty a id Lietncitu:
l
.npcal Board of the Atomic P.ncrgy Coreniscien (nou the Suc3 car Re:;ulatory Cercr.1icsie:
ad secre argued by counsel.
The orders appealed fro. :: ranted a constru.-tion.
mit for a nuclear power plant kno.en as the "Shoreham Plan:.-
The petition hallenges the orders on two grounds: (1) that the Cor.-ission f:lled to give lectuate consideration to the environmental irpact of " Class 9" accidents, and
- 2) that the Corrnission failed te give aderp.tato considarction to the incre.nental
.~fect of the Shorcham Plant in terms of the environmental ir. pact of the r.uclear nel cycle.
t'llCRT.\\S the first of these challenges is t ithout rerit, see Caro 3ina
.>ironeental Study Groun v. United States, 510 F.2d 796, 790-500 (D.C. Cir.
)
3 7.;), and j
hllCRC.iS the second of H ese challences is meriterious, se' h'a:u ra 1 Rer.curces i
fi'n :e Counci]. Inc. e.
t'nited Sta tec "": 2 r r r n c- ' :+ " r - ~ < e s i nn. Nos.-;;.-; N.
--1;Sh (D.C. Cir. July 21, 1976): Aeschiir-I'
..T S a t. c
.oc.1 car Ree:Li tarv
- d m ien, Nos. 73-17 76, ~3-3 80 7 Q.C. Cir. July e-, ld!'. ;, it i:
UP.Di; RED by the court that the case is renanded ra rhe Cc: tiseion for further
- nsideration in licht of the decisions in S : ural
':: ", ", -.~ i e:+ r C e n. c i l.
1: r.
. l'nited S ta tes ?:uelea r Rc r.l a tnev Cor:rd.e cE, cv " :,
2n.. iv - ' t.; i "i" v.
F o i G/ _'
- ates !.
- ncJ ear Re"ulatorv Cor'iir.r. ion, s un r:.
P_c,r, Cu: i
- .m 7903oooogg y{g.,
dtn wr:annon, in anrro w to t;,e i.-
j 1
_.. - = -
A,
O o
~
T[$liitCD E3fatCn (Colli't Of $13!)Ca[5 FoR THO ct"TntC: OF COLUuctA circuli No.-73-226s p.2 September Term,19 :
l The. remainder of the petition, ai; it relates to the en*.* iron-mental impact of the nuclear fuel cycle, shall remain in abeyance.cndir.g the_ issuance of a final fuel cycle rule.
Respondents are directed to to the court on the status.of the rulemaking in acccrdance with-report the schedule established in ::os. 73-1776 and 74-1385, and the cases cen-cclidated with the..
Per Curia:
FOR Tr?E CCUET:
lWf1C.4 Jm GEORGE A. FISP.IR Clerk
,em
!