ML20071D514
| ML20071D514 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee  |
| Issue date: | 03/03/1983 |
| From: | VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20071D476 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8303140511 | |
| Download: ML20071D514 (51) | |
Text
,
l ,
l EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL l
REPORT RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN FOR THIRD AND FOURTH QUARTERS,1982 1
L l
I
( VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION l
(
[
8303140511 830303 PDR ADOCK 05000271
i TABLE OF CONTENTS
. Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION
...................................................... 1 2.0 NETEOROLOGICAL DATA............................................... 2 i I
y 3.0 RAD I0 ACTIVITY RELE AS ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1 Liquid Releases.............................................. 3 3.2 Ga s e o u s Re le a s e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 l 4.0 DOSE ASSESSMENT................................................... 4 4.1 Organ Doses to Individuals from Receiving-Water Exposure Pathways............................................ 4 4.2 Individual Whole-Body and Skin Doses from Noble Ga s e ou s E f f lue n t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
( 4.3 Organ Doses to Individuals from Radioactive Iodine
~
)
and Pa rt iculate s in Gaseous Ef fluents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.4 Whole-Body Doses in Unrestricted Areas from Direct Radiation............................................. 8 4.5 Whole-Body Doses to the General Population from all J Re ce iving Wa t e r Rela t e d Pa t hway s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.6 Doses to the General Population and Average Individual within Fif ty Miles f rom Gaseous Ef fluent s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 RE F E RE N C E S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 FIGURES............................................................... 12-13 TABLES................................................................. 14-42 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEME NTAL INFORMATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Al
i LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title lA Gaseous Effluents - Summation of all Releasts 1R Gaseous Effluents - Elevated Releases 1C Gaseous Effluents - Routine Ground Level Releases 4
1D Gaseous Effluents - Non-Routine Releases 2A Liquid Ef fluents - Sunnation of all Releases 3 Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments 4-A to 4-H Vermont Yankc2 Joint Frequency Distribution July - September, 1982 5-A to 5-H Vermont Yankee Joint Frequency Distribution October - December, 1982 6 Quarterly Average X/Q and D/Q Values for Selected Receptors 7 Summary of Radiological Impact on Man
(
l l
I 4
( -111-(
i LIST OF FIGURES
! Figure No. Title 1A Vermont Yankee, July - September 1982, Upper Level Wind Rose IB Vermont Yankee, October - December 1982, Upper Level Wind Rose
)
I l
-iv-
VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN JULY - DECEMBER 1982
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Using actual measured effluent and meteorological data for the second six months of 1982, this report estimates potential doses from radioactive offluents that could affect individuals and the general population near the l Varmont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. Tables 1 through 3 list the recorded rcdioactive effluents and solid waste for this semi-annual period. Tables 4
)
cnd 5 report the cumulative joint frequency distribution of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability observed during the second half of 1982.
Figures lA and 1B summarize wind speed and direction in a wind rose. Table 6 lists the calculated X/Q and D/Q values at different points of interest based en the meteorological record presented in Tables 4 and 5 for both quarters.
Table 7 summarizes the potential radiological dose commitments to individuals cnd the general population surrounding the plant. Supplemental information concerning the plant's regulatory release limits and the methods used in measuring released radioactivity is given in Appendix A.
All estimates of potential dose for the second six months of 1982 were
/ within the dose objectives set forth in Appendix I to 10CFR50. This was cecomplished while the plant realized net capacity f actors (design MWe) of 88.0 percent and 94.9 percent for the third and fourth quarters, respectively.
1
-- x ---- . . . . . .
2.0 PETEOROLOGICAL DATA Meteorological data was collected during this reporting period from the cite's 300-foot met tower located approximately 2,200 feet northwe'st of the esactor building, and about 1,400 feet from the plant stack. The 300-foot I tower is approximately the same height as the primary plant stack (94 meters) cnd is designed to meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.23 for meteorological monitoring. Combined data recoverability for the third and fcurth quarters was 97.6 percent and 93.7 percent respectively.
X/Q and D/Q values were derived for all receptor points from the site noteorological record for each quarter using a straight-line airflow model.
All dispersion and air concentration factors have been calculated employing appropriate source configuration considerations, as described in Regulatory Guide 1.111 I1) , plus a source depletion model as described in Meteorology ond Atomic Energy (1968)( ), and deposition velocities as given by Pelletier end Zimbrick( ). Changes in terrain elevations in the site environment were clso factored into meteorological models. A full description of the methods used to evaluate air dispersion phenomenon at the plant site is given in Vermont Yankee's 10CFR Part 50, Appendix I evaluation ( ).
l
[
[
c
3.0 RADIOACTIVITY RELEASES 3.1 Liquid Releases There were no liquid releases of radioactivity from the plant during this semi-annual period.
3.2 Caseous Releases All gaseous ef fluent recorded for the.second half of the year are listed in Tables lA through ID. All gaseous effluents were recorded as continuous in nature, and were released to the environment via the 94 meter etack located approximately 875 feet north of the reactor building. As indicated in Table 1A, all gaseous ef fluents were well within the plants operating Technical Specification for gaseous releases of radioactivity.
In addition, there were no unplanned or non-routine releases of radioactivity in gaseous effluents during this reporting period.
r k
{
r
4.0 DOSE ASSESSMENT Following the guidance of NUREG-0473(7) , nuclides in particulate form e chich were not detected above the lower limit of detection, (LLD) have been reported as "less than" the LLD and have not been included in the dose cciculations. However, the release rate of noble gases from the plant stack, citer treatment of the gas stream from the air ejector through the augmented eff-gas system, is so low that no noble gases are detectable above the LLD.
Therefore, as a conservative approach for the noble gas releases, it has been ocsumed for dose calculational purposes that the principal noble gases f measured in the off-gas six at the air ejector are present at the LLD level l dstermined for the plant stack.
4.1 Organ Doses to Individuals from Receiving-Water Exposure Pathways There were no routine or accidental liquid releases f rom Vermont Yankee during the second half of 1982. As a result, no receiving water exposure pathways could contribute to any whole body or organ doses to individuals in unrestricted areas.
4.2 Individual Whole-Body and Skin Doses from Noble Gaseous Effluents Based on the method of sector averaging discussed in " Meteorology and Atomic Energy - Ti68", and utilizing the site meteorological data recorded for this reporting period, the point of maximum of f-site ground level air concentration of radioactive materials in gaseous ef fluents was determined for each quarter. Terrain height in the vicinity of the ef fluent stack was taken f For into account in calculating these effluent ground level concentrations.
the third and fourth quarters of 1982, the point of maximum ground level air
{ concentration was determined to be approximately WNW at 2415m from the plant otack. The undepleted X/Q's at these locations were calculated to be
~7 3 7.8 x 10 sec/m and 5.2 x 10- sec/m f or third and fourth quarters of the year, respectively.
{
. t. . . . .
Whole-body and skin doses were calculated at these off-site points as a result of noble gas releases occurring in both quarters. The methodology c.pplied to the dose calculations is consistent with that of Regulatory Guide 1.109(5) for an elevated release point. Dose conversion factors for noble geses and daughters were taken from Table B-1 of this Regulatory Guide. For the beta contribution to the skin dose, a semi-infinite cloud model was used.
The whole-body gamma dose was evaluated using a finite cloud sector average codel with Gaussian activity distribution in the vertical plane. The gamma radiation received at a point of interest from a differential volume of the cloud is calculated. The radiation is then integrated over the entire cloud, tcking into account the geometry of the cloud, variation in concentration, ottenuation by the interaction of photons with matter in the path between source and the receptor point, and scattering of radiation from material outside the direct path to the point of interest. An attenuation factor of 0.7 is also applied to the dose calculations to account for the dose reduction due to shielding which would be provided by a residential structure. No cdditional credit is taken for decay of radionuclides in transit to the receptor point.
f For the third quarter, the skin and whole-body doses from exposure to noble gases at the point of maximum ground level air concentration were calculated to be 0.12 mrem and 0.047 mrem, respectively. For the noble gaseous effluent during the fourth quarter, the skin and whole-body doses at the point of maximum ground level air concentration were calculated to be 0.074 mrem and 0.030 arem, respectively.
( In addition, the maximum nearest resident and site boundary whole-body and skin doses have been calculated due to noble gaseous effluents from the plant stack during the reporting period. The maximum whole-body and skin site boundary doses (both 0.10 arem) for the third quarter of 1982 occurred in the S sector, 0.25 miles from the stack. The fourth quarter maximum whole-body and skin site boundary doses (both 0.092 arem) also occurred in the S sector 0.25 miles from the stack.
In the third quarter, the maximum skin and whole-body dose to the nearest resident (both approximately 0.08 arem) in any direction was
(
determined to be in the S sector, 0.34 miles from the plant stack. As a
rssult of the fourth quarter meteorology and noble gas effluents, the maximum whole-body and skin dose to the nearest resident (both approximately 0.07 cres) in any sector also occurred in the S sector, 0.34 miles from the plant etack.
The resultant doses due to noble gas effluents for the maximum site boundary location, maximum nearest resident, and point of maximum ground level cir concentration are tabulated in Table 7. All doses are conservative in that they assume 100 percent occupancy at each point. Whole-body doses consider the gamma radiation received from the effluent plume overhead. The ckin doses consider both the beta and gamma contributions at the receptor point. All doses from noble gaseous effluents are well below the dose criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix 1.
4.3 Organ Doses to Individuals from Radioactive Iodine and Particulates in Gaseous Effluents The critical pathway of internal exposure to radioactive iodine and particulates, including tritium, resulting from gaseous effluents for the third quarter is through the grass-milk pathway. It is assumed that milk cnimals are f ree to graze on open pasture during the third quarter with no supplemental feeding. This assumption is conservative since most of the milk cnimals inventoried in the site vicinity are fed stored feed throughout the entire year with only limited grazing allowed during the growing season. It has also been assumed that only 50 percent of the iodine deposited from gaseous ef fluent is in elemental form (12) and is available for uptake.
This assumption is conservative for long-term doses (see p. 26, Reference 5).
/ During the wint 1 months of the year, the dose commitment through the cilk pathway and f resh vegetable ingestion is insignificant. The maximum length of annual growing season is approximately six months long in this part
( of New England. Therefore, the milk pathway and vegetable ingestion doses for the fourth quarter are the result of activity deposited on feed and vegetables grown during the growing season and allowed to decay while held in storage.
1 As a result, the critical pathway of exposure for radioactive iodine and particulates during the fourth quarter is through inhalation.
l As a result of the milk and fresh vegetable pathways, the maximum dose ;
fcr the third quarter from gaseous releases of radioactive iodine and particulates was determined to occur at a farm 1.9 miles west-northwest of the plant. The critical organ was a child's thyroid with a calculated dose of cpproximately 0.001 arem. For the fourth quarter, with inhalation being the principal pathway of exposure, the maximum organ dose was projected to also be et the same farm. The critical organs were the thyroid, GI-LLI and whole body of a child, each with a calculated dose of 7.0 x 10'4 arem. The pathways of exposure which were assumed to exist during the third quarter at this f arm include ground plane exposure, inhalation, fresh home grown vegetables and cow's milk. The pathways of exposure considered at the farm during the fourth quarter include continuous ground plane exposure, inhalation and contributions from stored vegetables and milk.
Table 7 shows the maximum calculated quarterly organ dose due to the esmbination of exposures f rom all pathways which have been identified at the farm. Table 7 also shows the calculated organ doses to the highest exposed usarby resident, and potential organ doses to individuals if assumed standing at the highest ground level air concentration point on the site boundary for the entire six-month reporting period. The site boundary doses include only exposure from inhalation, and direct radiation from the ground plane. The nearest resident is assumed to have a vegetable garden during the growing
]
ceason which contributes to his or her ingestion dose. For all ground plane exposures, the activity is assumed to accumulate on the ground for 15 years at the rate equivalent to that observed during each quarter. This is a cimplified method of approxit_ating the average deposition over the life of the plant. The calculated dose f rom direct exposure to activity on the ground thus represents the dose an individoal would see in each quarter if the plant had been operating 15 years. This approach is very conservative, but shows the relative impact the plant would have on the dose commitment over its operating life if the releases were to continue at the levels recorded during this reporting period.
The critical organs for both the third and fourth quarters for the nearest resident with the most exposure were the thyroid, GI-LLI and whole body of a child. The doses to these critical organs for the third and fourth
{
quarters were calculated to be 1.5 x 10 mrem (SSE, 1.3 miles) and
-0 1.6 x 10 arem (SSE,1.3 miles), respectively.
The critical organs for both the third and fourth quarters for the taximum site boundary location were the thyroid, GI-LLI and whole body of both c teen and an adult. The doses to these critical organs for the third and fcurth quarters were calculated to be 3.9 x 10
-5 arem (SSE, 0.53 miles) and 2.4 x 10 -5 mrem (SSE, 0.53 miles), respectively.
4.4 Whole-Body Doses in Unrestricted Areas from Direct Radiation The major source of direct radiation (including sky shine) from the otation is due to N-16 decay in the turbine building. Because of the crientation of the turbine building on the site, and the shielding effects of the adjacent reactor building, only the seven westerly sectors (SSW NNW) see any significant direct radiation.
High pressure ionization chamber (HPIC) measurements have been made in the plant area in order to estimate the direct radiation from the station.
The chamber was located at a point along the west site boundary which has been determined to receive the :naximum direct radiation f rom the plant. Using reasurements of dose rate made while the plant operated at dif ferent power levels, from shutdown to 100 percent, the total integrated dose from direct radiation over each three month period was determined by considering the quarterly gross megawatts generated. Field measurements of exposure, in units of Roentgen, were modified by multiplying by 0.6 to obtain whole-body dose equivalents, in units of rem, in accordance with recommendations of HASL report 305(6) for radiation fields resulting from N-16 photons.
Estimates of the population exposure from direct radiation during the third and f ourth quarters have been made out to two miles. Beyond two miles, the dose from the turbine building is negligible. As a result, the estimated L population dose for each of the two quarters respectively was approximately
-2 -2 1.9 x 10 and 2.0 x 10 person-rem, for a total population of about 351
( persons. The estimated direct radiation dose at the maximum site boundary location was approximately 3.4 mrem for the third quarter of 1982, and 3.6 arem for the fourth. These site boundary doses assume a 100 percent
\
cecupancy factor, taking no credit for the shielding effect of any structure.
Table 7 summarizes these results.
r
4.5 Whole-Body Doses to the General Population from all Reeiving Water Related Pathways There were no routine or accidental liquid releases from Vermont Yankee during the second half of 1982.
4.6 Doses to the General Population and Average Individual Within Fif ty Miles from Gaseous Ef fluents Using site meteorological data in Tables 4 and 5, quarterly average X/Q values were determined for each sector formed by placing radial rings from the plant at distances of one, two, three, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty cnd fif ty miles, and their intersection with radial lines drawn to form each of the sixteen principe.1 compass directions. For noble gases, whole-body and ckin doses were calculated for each sector and multiplied by the estimated pspulation within each sector to determine the sector person-rem. No credit for decay in transit of activity was assumed.
6 For the approximately 1.1 x 10 people within fifty miles of the plant, the third and fourth quarter whole-body doses from noble gas cloud exposure were estimated to be 0.81 person-rem and 0.70 person-rem,
/ respectively. For the same two quarters, the average individual whole-body
~4 ~
doses were 7.1 x 10 mrem and 6.1 x 10 ' area, respectively. The skin doses for the two quarters were 1.8 person-rem and 1.5 person-rem,
-3 f respectively. The average individual skin dose was 1.6 x 10 and 1.3 x 10 -3 mrem for the third and fourth quarters.
Table 7 also indicates the population whole-body and thyroid dose commitments from radioactive iodine and particulates (including tritium) released from the plant in gaseous waste. The pathways of exposure which have been considered for the 50 mile population include inhalation, ingestion of f vegetables, milk and meat produced within 50 miles, and the direct exposure to cctivity deposited on the ground plane. The dose due to iodines in ingested food is based on the assumption that only 50 percent of the iodines is
[
i olemental and available for uptake. The total whole-body and thyroid dose commitments for the third quarter were calculated to be 7.0 x 10 -3 person-rem and 7.2 x 10 -3 person-rem respectively. For the fourth quarter,
-3 -3 person-rem these doses were 6.7 x 10 person-rem and 6.7 x 10 respectively.
1
(
~
l
=
REFERENCES
- 1. Regulatory Guide 1.111, " Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and
- Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors", U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Of fice of Standards Development, March 1976.
- 2. Meteorology and Atomic Energy,1968, Section 5-3.2.2, " Cloud Depletion",
pg. 204. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, July 1968.
- 3. C. A. Pelletier, and J. D. Zimbrick, " Kinetics of Environmental Radioiodine Transport Through the Milk-Food Chain", Environmental Surveillance in the Vicinity of Nuclear Facilities, Charles D. Thomas Publishers, Springfield, Illinois, 1970.
4 " Supplemental Information for the Purposes of Evaluation of 10CFR Part 50, Appendix I", Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation, June 2,1976.
- 5. Regulatory Guide 1.109, " Calculation of Annual Doses to Man From Routine Release of Reactor Ef fluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10CFR Part 50, Appendix I", U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Of fice of Standards Development, Revision 1, October 1977.
- 6. W. M. Lowder, P. D. Raf t, and G. dePlanque Burke, " Determination of N-16 Gamma Radiation Fields at BWR Nuclear Power Stations", Health and Safety Laboratory, Energy Research & Development Administration, Report No. 305, May 1976. .
- 7. NUREG-0473, " Radiological Ef fluent Technical Specifications for BWR's",
Revision 2, July 1981; Table 4.11-1, Notation f.
(
5
[
)
STA8ttlTY Class ALL ,
j l
3515 20%
- A 10%
N D~> " 0 00% LA 5
catn S
$P((0 RANG [ SENSOR LEVELS IN f1 Pet 0.6 -3 0 WIND SPEED = UPPER DIRECTION = UPPER 4 0 -7.0 DELTA TEMP = UPPER
(
0 0 -12.0
[
13.0-ie.0 MISSING HOURS = 53 19.0-24 0
- GT 24.0
[
FIGURE lA: VERMONT YANKEE JULY-SEPTEMBER, 1982 UPPER LEVEL WIND ROSE
STABilliY CL ASS RLt .
30%
20 %
10 %
[3) " 0 . 0 0 Y. El f CALM j S
)
(
5"EED " 8E SENSOR LEVELS IN ftFM
' O 6 -3.0 WIND SPEED = UPPER
,,o .3,3 DIRECTION = UPPER f DELTA TEMP = UPPER 8.0 -12 0
(
i 3. 0-i s .r, MISSING HOURS = 139 19 0 24 0 GT 24 0 FIGURE 1B: VERMONT YANKEE OCTOBER-DECEMBER, 1982 UPPER LEVEL WIND ROSE
)
TABLE 1A VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT JULY-DECE!!BER 1982 CASEOUS EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Unit Quarter Quarter Est. Total 3 4 Error, %
A. Fission & activation gases Ci < 7 . 6 0E+2 1100 1- Total release < 7. 85E+2
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/see < l.00E+2 < 9. 89E+1 Percent of technical specification limil % < 1. 3 7 E-1 < l . 34 E-1 3.
- 3. Icoines Ci 1.81E-5 1.07E-5 50
- 1. Total iodine - 131 1.36E-6
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 2.30E-6 4.80E-4 2.84E-4
- 1. Percent of technical specification limit C. Particulates Particulates with half-lives > 8 days Ci 2.33E-4 2.50E-4 150 1.
Aversee release rate for period uCi/see 2.97E-5 3.18E-5 2.
- 3. Percent of technical specification limit % 5.56E-3 4.26E-3 f 4 Gross alpha radioactivity Ci 1.24E-7 1.06E-7 D. Tritium ci 6.52E+0 7.78E+0 150
- 1. Total release
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 8.38E-1 9.90E-1
- 3. Percent of technical specification limit % N.A. N.A.
[ - - -_-__-
TABLE IB VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEM1 ANNUAL REPORT JULY-DECEMBER 1982 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - ELEVATED RELEASE CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE *1 Nuclides Released Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter 3 4
- 1. Fission gases krypton-8S Ci *2 *2 krypton-85m Ci < 1. 8 3 E+0 < 1.89E+0 krypton-87 Ci < 1.54E+1 < 1.54E+1 krypton-88 Ci < 9.62E+0 < 9.91E+0 Ci < 3.55E+0 < 1.19E+1 xenon-133 xenon-135 Ci < 1.goE+1 < 1,ggE+o xenon-135m Ci < 1. 41E+2 < 1. 41E+2 xenon-138 Ci < 5.91E+2 < 5 . 7 6E+2 Others (specify) Ci Ci Ci unidentified Ci Total for period Ci < 7. 8 5E+2 < 7.60 E+2
- 2. Iodines iodine-131 Ci 1.81E-5 1.07E-5 iodine-133 Ci <2.41E-4 <2.62E-4 iodine-135 Ci <6.15E-3 <6.01E-3 Total for period Ci 1.81E-5 1.07E-5
- 3. Particulates strontium-89 Ci 1.54E-6 1.92E-6 strontium-90 Ci 2.51E-7 2.08E-7 cesium-134 Ci <A ?9r s <8.22E-5 cesium-137 Ci 3.76E-5 <6.25E-5
_ barium-lanthanum-140 Ci <1.80E-4 <1.80E-4 Others (specify) Ci cobalt-58 Ci <6.59E-5 2.05E-5 cobalt-60 Ci 1.96E-4 1.49E-4 zine-65 Ci <1.80E-4 5.76E-5 manganese-54 Ci <6.74E-5 2.27E-5 unidentified Ci g
L
- 1 No batch mode gaseous elevated releases for this period.
- 2 Not detected in the offgas mix. Limit of detectability = 6.79E-7 pCi/cc.
I l
c TABLE 1C VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT JULY-DECDGER 1982 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - GROUND LEVEL RELEASES There were no routine measured ground level continuous or batch mode gaseous releases during the reporting period.
l r
L
[
~
TABLE ID VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANhTAL REPORT JULY-DECElBER 1982 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - NONROUTINE PJLEASES There were no non-routine or accidental gaseous effluent releases during the reporting period.
l
(
r
TABLE 2A VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT JULY-DECEMPER 1982 LIQUID EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES There were no liquid effluent releases during the reporting period.
{
S
[
[
TABLE 3 VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT JULY-DECEMBER 1982 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not irradiated fuel)
Unit 6-month 2st. Total
- 1. Type of waste Period Error, **
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator mo 5.30E+1 bottoms, etc. Ci 4.51E+1 75
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated m3 8. 33E+1 equip, etc. Ci 2.12E+0 75
- c. Irradiated components, control m3 0 rods, etc. Ci 0 mo 0 Ci 0
- d. Other (describe)
- 2. Estimate of major nuclide composition (by type of waste)
% 2.0E+1
- a. cesium-134 cesium-137 % 5.1E+1
% 2.0F+0 cobalt-58 manganese-54 % 2.0E+0 zinc-65 % 7.0E+0 cobalt-60 % 1.6E+1 b, cesium-134 % 2.3E+1 cesium-137 % 4.1E+1 cobalt-58 % 9.8E-1 manganese-54 % 2.5E+0 zinc-65 % 8.4E+0 cobalt-60 % 2.*E+1
'4
- 3. Solid Waste Disposition Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination 12 Truck Barnwell, S.C.
Truck Richland, Wash.
2 B. IRRADI ATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Disposition)
- Number of Shipments Mode of Trznsportation Destination 0 N.A. N.A.
r
N46 -46 (D O S c) & w CCC e, 0 4
- OCo eMe E N C4 4
- C. C. n. . N. O.
O C. M. (L. =.
b O. C.
CC M o. b.
C- a O CC O a C
> C.
- D C4 I k
.J CCo CCC CCC COC Coo CCC CCC CCC C
& w g C. C. C. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. C. C. C. C. v. .
-MO N4% OCC 4 4 C, e Q 000 000 OCOC. C. MO4 w =. 40 C4 0 C. C. b. N.
2 C. C. C. O.
oO N n OC o s
e CO oO b b
3 CCC - Fj C -MD CCC CCg CCC OCC N44 e Z 40 O. v. C. C. O. C. N. C. g C. O. +. C. C. C.
4 3 coo CCC Cog Coo Coo CCC CgC Coo e Z 2
g 3 CoC 000 Cog 00g OgG CCC CCC COC L u
C. C. C. C. O. v. O. v. v. 0 v. v. v. v. C. C.
^
D U 3 CCC M
C00 CoC OCp Coo CC9 CCC CCC v; U C. C. C. C.
E 3 C. C. C. C. C. C. C. v. C. v. C. C.
W CC 00 CC CC CC CC CC CC C 6 2 3 CCC CCC CCC COC Coo CCC CgC CCC 3 I > 6 O. C. C. C. C. C. o. C. C. C. v. c. C. C.
y V C. C.
CC OC CC CC CC I e Z CC CC CC L W q J E 5' 0 3 CCC CCC Coo - (n o CCC CCC CCC -Mr v E W g ur W g L O C. C. O. C. C. C. 4. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. 4. C. g A L Co OC CC 04 oC CC CC (4 v 4 E
- e@ v. Mme MO CCC & (D N
-
- O OCg -MO CCC e M e.
< 4 H C. v. 4. C. C. C. 0.
Fs a
- 4. C. C. C.
44 4 .,.J O . ..
' O W CC N CC C b N OC fn 5 m - N g eMe CCC CCC OSC p F G W CCC CCC - F> 0 ON4
- D + 40 Fa w
- c. . C. C. C. C. .n g. n.
E C M C. C. C. C. . .
< a 2 CC CC N 4 o OC CC e e e H
3 N - M C
M *88 88 88 88. *88 88 88. *88 C C
> CZ C CW h' W CCo CCC coo Mme Cog CCC CCC Mme ac W E O O. v. C. C. C. C. CD. . pQ D e W C. C. C. C. C. O. (D. a.
W W II C v HF w
W CCC CC? CCC CCe Cog CCo CCo CCC c2
> e C. C. C. s. C. C. C. C. O. v. C. C. C. C. C. C. CC
.Z-g -er to @
kZ
< m C
W CCC Z
-Mo 009 CCC CCC CCC CoC
& W C. C. 4. C. C. v. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. 4. C. .C .C N @ CC N CC OO CC CO OC C4 >>
C cd CCC CCC CCC CCC CCC = F, 0 cc a W CCC MO Z 40 WW r A C. C. C. o. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. 4. C. me W CO N CC 0C CC CC CC U mm
)
' ?
s= W Z
CCC Coc eCC CCC C99 CCC CCC CCC cC CC s 4 2 C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. v. v. C. C. C. C. C. C. O q.
_ = Z 2
88 88 88. *88 88 88 88 OC
> 3 CC
>- H FH Z 6 - gom Maa go . gj a - g. g.. e.. zz C I J=N I a 04 iN N.=0- . = .=I ww
- C4 04 N C4 N CN WW s
E Q- dww Oww tww I -- I~w ww www vu E C. L
- U (L M e H EC W b a a C WW 2 O Q 4L f4 W nu W J aa 4 t .'a f4
@ q ww I
. - _ _ _ _ _ . _ __m
2 y a __ rm r--- m ~ a -
TABLE 4B
(
VERMONT YANKEE JUL-SEP 1982 JOINT FREOUEf4CY DISTRIBUTION (UPPER 1. EVE 1.)
STARILITY CLASS B (LASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 3.02 297.0 FT WIND DATA WIND DIRECTION FROM E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW W<.W W WNW NW NNW VRBL TOTAL SPEED (MPH) N NNE NE ENE O O O O O O O O O O O O CALM O O O O O O 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 n.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 l (1) O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0 0 0 0 O O O O 9 i C-3 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 13.85 1.54 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 l (3) 3.08 3.00 3.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42 l (2) .09 .09 .09 0.00 0.00 .05 .05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 24 4-7 5 2 1 0 2 2 1 3 36.92 0.00 3.08 3.08 1.54 4.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 1.54 9.23 0.00 h (1) 7.69 3.OR 1.54
.05 .28 0.00 1.11 (2) .23 .09 .05 0.00 .09 .09 .05 .34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 l H j
' 2 0 6 0 26 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 6 4 0 0 0 1 8-12 3.08 0.00 9.23 0.00 40.00 l 4.62 3.08 9.23 6.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 (1) 3.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .09 0.00 .28 0.00 1.21 (2) .09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .14 .09 .28 .19 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 O O O O O 1 4 0 6 13-18 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 6.15 0.00 9.23 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .28 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .19 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 l
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 19-24 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 l 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 O O O O O O O O OT 24 0 0 n O O O O O O O 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (3) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 n.00 0.00 0.co 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
(?) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 4 9 5 O O O 2 3 ? 16 0 65 ALL SPEEDS 9 4 3 9 2 100.00 3.09 9.23 6.15 13.85 7.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.OA 4.62 3.08 24.62 0.00 i (1) 13.85 6.15 4.62 0.00 ,14 .74 0.00 3.0.
0.00 .09 .28 .19 42 .2t 0.00 0.00 n.00 .00 .09 (2) .42 .19 .14 ,1
(
(1)= PERCENT OF All. GOnD OBSERVATIONS FnR THIR PAGE (2)=PFRCENT OF AL L OOnD ODSFRVATIONS FnH THIS F FRIOD .60 MPH)
Cr cal N (WINn SPEED iEC.S THAN OR EOUA1 TO l
l l
l l
l
\ Tm r~m e-, m ~,
{
TABLE 4C e
VERMONT YAt*EE JJL-SEP 19A? slOINT FRE0ttENCY DISTFi!F.ttTION (ttPPER LEVEL)
STABILITY CLASS C CLASM FREQtfENCY (PERCENT) = 6.31 297.0 FT WIND DATA WIND DIRECTION FROM NE ENE F ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WC.W W WNW NW NNW VRPL TOTAL SPEFD(MPH) N NNE O O O O O O O O O O O l CALH O O O O O O O O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 l (1) O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 O.On O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 l (2) f 3 2 7 0 2 O I O 1 0 2 3 0 26 i C-3 2 1 0 2 0.00 19.32 (1) 1.47 .74 0.00 1.47 2.21 1.47 5.15 0.00 1.47 0.00 .74 0.00 74 0.00 1.47 2.21
.05 0.00 .09 .14 .09 .32 0.00 .09 0.00 .05 0.00 05 0.00 .09 .14 0.00 1.21 (2) .09 5 4 0 O O 5 6 0 40 4-7 3 1 1 2 3 3 5 1 1
.74 1.47 2.21 2.21 3.68 3.68 2.94 0.00 .74 .74 0.00 0.00 3.68 4.41 0.00 29.41 1 (1) 2.21 .74
.19 0.00 .05 .05 0.00 0.00 .21 .28 0.00 1.86 y (2) .14 .05 .05 .09 .14 .14 .23 .23 I 2 2 8 0 37 A-1? 4 O O O O 4 1 4 6 3 2 0 1 (1) 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.94 .74 2.94 4.41 2.21 1.47 0.00 .74 1.47 1.47 5.88 0.00 27.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 .19 .05 .19 .28 .14 .09 0.00 .05 .09 .09 .37 0.00 1.72 (2) .19 0.00 O O O O O ? 2 O O 5 2 4 8 0 26 13-18 1 2 O 74 1.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.47 1,47 0.00 0.00 3.68 1.47 2.94 5.88 0.00 19.12 (1) .37 0.00 1.21
.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .09 .09 0.00 0.00 .23 .09 .19 (2) .05 0 0 0 O O O O O 2 3 0 7 19-24 0 0 0 0 1 1 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .74 .74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.47 2.21 0.00 5.15
.05 .05 0.00 e.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .09 .14 0.00 .32 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OT 74 0 0 0 0 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 (1) O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 (2) O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 0.00 4 6 9 13 to 15 5 4 1 7 4 15 28 0 13A Al L SPEEDS 10 4 3 2.94 4.43 6.62 9.56 7.35 11.03 3.68 2.94 .74 5.15 2.94 11.03 20.59 0.00 100.00 (1) 7.35 2.94 .74 46 .19 .05 .19 .?8 42 .60 .46 .70 .23 .1* 05 .32 .19 .70 1.30 0.00 6.31 (2)
(1)= PERCENT OF ALL OOOD OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PAGF
(?)=PERCFNT OF ALL CJ'inD ORSERVATIONS FnR THIS PERIOD C= CALM (WIND c.PEFD LESS THAN OR EOtIAl. TO .60 MPH)
1 r- I o i < m - -
TABLE 4D ,
w l
VERT 10NT YANKEE sIOL-SEP 1982 sIOINT FREOllENCY DISTRIBUTION (UPPER t.EVEL)
STADit.1TY CLASS D CLASS FREQUENCY (PFRCENT) = 38.79 297.0 FT WIND DATA WIND DIRECTION FROM NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S S$W SW WSW W WNW NW NNW VRBL TOTAL SPEED (MPH) N NNE O O O O O O O O O O O O O CALH O O O O O (33 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 (2) O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 17 15 11 6 3 5 0 7 15 0 161 C-3 16 15 7 9 12 14 1 19.26 1.67 2.03 1,79 1.32 .72 .22 .36 .60 .96 .84 1.79 0.00 (1) 1.91 1.79 .84 f.08 1.44
.32 .70 0.00 7.47 (2) .74 .70 .32 .42 .56 .65 .79 .70 .51 .28 .05 .14 .23 .37 13 18 18 30 27 7 8 5 6 2 11 54 0 236 I 4-7 17 6 3 11 1.32 6.46 0.00 28.23 y (1)
(2) 2.03
.79 72
.28
.36
.14 1.56
.60 1.32 2.15 2.15
.51 .84 .84 3.59 1.39 3.23 1.25
.84
.32
.96
.37
.60
.23
.72
.28
.24
.09 .51 2.51 0.00 10.95 ,
a 34 35 21 7 13 24 21 7 53 0 271 8-12 23 5 3 3 3 13 6 1.56 .72 4.07 4.19 2.51 .84 1.56 2.07 2.51 .84 6.34 0.00 32.42 l (1) 2.75 .60 .36 .36 .36
.60 .28 1.58 1.62 .97 .32 .60 1.!! .97 .3? 2.46 0.00 12.58 l (2) 1.07 .23 .14 .14 .14 2 6 22 3 2 6 14 29 13 20 0 143 13-18 20 4 0 0 1 1 2.39 48 0.00 0.00 .12 .24 .12 .72 2.63 .3A .24 .72 1.67 3.47 1.56 2.39 0.00 17.II (1) .60 .93 0.00 6.64
.19 0.00 0.00 .05 .09 .05 .28 1.02 .14 .09 .28 .65 1.35 (2) .93 O O O 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 11 0 22 19-24 4 i O O O
.32 1.32 0.00 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .36 0.00 0.00 0.00 .12 .12 (1) 48 .12 0.00 1.O?
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .14 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .05 .05 .51 (2) .19 .05 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 OT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .24 .32 0.00 .36 I (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 .14 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .09 47 85 98 37 In 27 50 61 41 154 'O 836 Att SPEEDS 80 31 13 25 27 42 100.00 4.43 ?.15 3.23 5.98 7.30 4.90 18.42 0.00 (1) 9.57 3.71 1.56 2.99 3.23 5.62 5.02 10.17 11.72 2.32 2.83 1.90 7.15 0.00 38.79 (2) 3.71 1.44 .60 1.1A 1.25 2.18 1.95 3.94 4. 5*. 1.72 .84 1.25 (1)= PERCENT OF ALL GOOD ODSERVATIONS FOR THIS PAGE (2)=PERrENT OF ALL OOOD OPSERVATIONs FOR THIS PERIOD .60 MPH)
C= CALM (WIND SPEED l ESS THAN OR FOUN TO
r r~n 7m r-m m m n _
TABLE 4E c VERMONT YANKEE JUL-SEP 1982 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION (UPPER LEVEL)
STABILITY CLASS E CL ASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 36.66 ,
297.0 FT WIND DATA i WIND DIRECTION FRott ;
9 FSE SE SSE S SSil SW WSW W WNW NW NNW VRBL TOTAL.
SPEED (MPH) N NNE NE ENE E t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CALM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32 4 2 4 4 5 7 28 0 266 C-3 37 24 24 25 17 26 17 to 33.67 1.27 .51 .25 .51 .51 .63 .99 3.54 0.00 (1) 4.68 3.04 3.04 3.16 2.15 3.29 4.05 2.15 .19 .23 .32 1.30 0.00 12.34 1.11 1.21 1.48 .79 .46 .19 .09 .19 (2) 1.72 1.11 1.16 .79 18 15 44 12 11 7 6 8 8 9 75 0 266 4-7 31 6 2 3 11 33.67 1.39 2.28 1.90 5.57 1.52 1.39 .89 .76 1.01 1.01 1.14 9.49 0.00
.(1) 3.92 .76 .25 .38 42 3.48 0.00 12.34 1.44 .51 .84 .70 2.04 .56 .51 .32 .28 .37 .37 b
v (2) .28 .09 .14 2 31 20 6 to 6 22 16 7 59 0 194 8 8-12 13 0 0 0 1 1
.13 .25 .13 3.92 2.53 .76 1.27 .76 2.78 2.03 .89 7.47 0.00 24.56 (1) 1.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02 .74 .32 2.74 0.Cc 9.00 (2) .60 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .09 .05 1.44 .93 .23 .46 .28 0 0 4 11 4 1 0 6 15 2 11 0 57 13-18 2 0 0 0 1
.25 1.39 0.00 7.22
.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .13 .51 3.30 .51 .13 0.00 .76 1.90 (1) .09 .51 0.00 2.65 (2) .09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .19 .51 .19 .05 0.00 .28 .70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 6 19-24 0 0 0
.51 0.00 0.00 .76 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.25
.09 .19 0.00 0.00 .28 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I GT 24 0 0 0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .13 0.00 0.00 .13 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 0.00 .05 30 26 28 29 46 49 96 53 25 20 16 40 46 .c 173 0 790 ALL SPEEDS 83 100.00 (1) 10.51 3.80 3.?9 3.54 3.67 5.82 6.20 12.15 6.71 3.16 2.53 2.03 5.06 5.82 3.80 23.90 0.00 (2) 3.85 1.39 1.21 1.30 1.35 2.13 2.27 4.45 2.46 1.16 .93 .74 1.86 2.13 1.39 8.03 0.00 36.66 (1)rP1 RCENT OF Al.L 0n00 OBSERVATIcer3 FOR THIS PAGE (2)= PERCENT OF ALL GnOD OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOD C= CALM (WIND SPFFD I ESS THAN OR F00Al. TO .60 MPH)
vm r- r- m. m ~ ._
TABLE 4F ,
VERMONT YANKEE AIL-SEP 1982 sl0 INT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUT10N (TIPPER LEVEL)
STABILITY Ct. ASS F CLASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 12.34 297.0 FT WIND DATA WIND DIRECTION FROM SSF S SSW SW WSW W WiM NW NNW VR9L TOTAL N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SPEED (MPH) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CALM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 (1) O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 4 4 4 2 3 3 8 11 0 122 C-3 11 16 8 4 10 16 14 1.13 1.13 3.01 4.14 0.00 45.86 (1) 4.14 6.02 3.01 1.50 3.76 6.02 5.26 1.50 1.50 1.50
.19 1.50
.19
.75
.09 .14 .14 .37 .51 0.00 5.66 (2) .51 .74 .37 .19 46 .74 .65 .19 .19 10 7 5 6 3 6 0 9 11 0 99 4-7 14 2 1 2 3 7 14 0.00 37.22 3
33 .38 1.13 2.63 5.26 3.76 2.63 1.88 2.26 1.13 2.26 0.00 3.38 4.14 y (1) 5.26 .75
.05 .05 .14 .32 .65 .46 .32 .23 .20 .14 .28 0.00 .42 .51 0.00 4.59
- (2) .65 .09 4 3 3 4 9 2 3 to 0 40 8-12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
.38 0.00 .38 1.50 1.13 1.13 1.50 3.38 .75 1.13 3.76 0.00 15.04 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42 .09 .14 .46 0.00 1.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 .05 .19 .14 .14 .19 (2) 0 0 0 0 ? O O 1 0 4 13-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 *
.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .75 0.00 0.00 .38 0.00 1.50 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .09 0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 .19 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 19-24 0 0 0 .38 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .38 0.00 0.00 .05 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OT 24 0 0 0 0.00 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25 10 9 5 13 24 28 16 15 12 13 9 20 5 20 34 0 266 ALL SPEEDS 100.00 (1) 9.40 6.77 3.38 1.89 4.89 9.02 10.53 6.02 5.64 4.51 4.99 3.38 7.52 1.88 7.52 12.78 0.00 (2) 1.16 .04 .42 .23 .60 1.11 1.30 .74 .70 .56 .60 42 .91 .23 .93 1.53 0.00 12.34 (1)= PERCENT OF All. 000D ORGFRVATIONS FOR THIS PAGE (2)= PERCENT OF Al.L 000D OM.FRVATIONS FOR THIS PFR100 C= CALM (WIND SPEED IESS THAN OR EOllAL TO .60 NPH)
m W 88 *RR "t3 "81 88 88 *88 T.8:
g id p- f- 4- is di di g; g
t i *88 88 *88 *88 88 88 88- 88 S-E di di di && && si .si sd C
{ *88 -t8 -t84* 88 *88 *88 88 "R$ ~
~
di 4- is is di di i- g a
w 3 ogg -bg *g** *g9 *g9 CgC* *99.x -60 CC 7.
t CO
.x CC CC
.x CC .
CC 7.
4 e
C a
) 88 88 -08 "R$ 88 *S8 *88 "8%
di 54 4- i si si && a*
~
~
-be C9C
- b *e- 6 3
09g Cgg Mg*7
.. .. . 7* ogg..
CC9*x M* "
- - _ m
!$ ] *88 dd -t8 4-88 dd 88 dd 88 *88 id 44 88 dd t8 4-c e =
2
~
> 3 88 88 "S: 88 *F8 *88 *88 "Ei WW w
di id A-is id 44 di 4-t IgI g E
- 88 t8 *88 *88 88 '88 "RS 0 t dd 4- 4- di id dd id i' 5 e g
- w$ $
- 88 "R8 "RS 88 88 88 *88 *2t g ee" ed i- i- is id 44 id i-w _
d e M 88 -t8 *88 88 *88 *88 *88 -t8 g l z
3 dd 4- is id 44 44 dd 4-
$ W *88 88 -t8 *88 88 88 88 t8 c
- is is 4- di ad dd && 4' yj aw
$e s8
. W
- 88 *88 *88 di di id 88 di 88 *88 *88 di is si 88 "
di $2 k d EE 88 *88 88 88 88 *88 *88 88 ee E di 46 id is is di dd id EE
-d
{ 8 W
- 88 88 di 88 di 88 di 88 is 88 is 88 *88 $e5 di di CC n V di 2 ss
(
W *88 *88 -t8 88 88 *88 *88 -t0 E5 t g di id 4- id is di id 4- gg 0 g 88 -t8 88 88 88 88 *88 t0 8 I 4E -
dd 4- is id && si d4 4- $8 L
w 8 2
- 88 88 *88 88 88 *88 *88 *88 ;_ da
!eg id de dd dd id id 46 id th t __ ~__ .__ .__
.__ g_:0
_ :s 00 lC4 l .__
ice 6:0_4: 0 7:
S 7:9 a:D ":0 0 t E m
f $$
W& 8 tt
[ se :a
[
TABLE 4H VERMONT YANKEE JUL-SEP 1982 slOINT FREQlENCY DISTRIBllTION (OPPER LEVELI STABILITY C1. ASS Al.1. CLASS FREOtXNCY (PERCENT) = 100.00 297.0 FT WIND DATA WIND DIRECTION FROM ESE SE SSF S SSW SW W.W W WNW NW NNW VRBL TOTAL SPEED (MPH) N NNE NE ENE E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CALM o 0 0 0 0 ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42 71 37 30 15 8 to 14 16 26 58 0 596 C-3 68 59 42 43 59 1.95 1.90 1.95 2.74 3.29 1.72 1.39 .70 .37 46 .65 .74 1.21 2.69 0.00 27.66 (1) 3.16 2.74 .37 46 .65 .74 1.21 2.69 0.00 27.66 (2) 3.16 2.74 1.95 3.90 1.95 2.74 3.29 1.72 1.39 .70 30 48 54 93 52 24 25 15 23 12 36 153 0 600 4-7 70 17 9 19 31.55 3.25 .79 .42 .88 1.39 2.23 2.51 4.'12 2.45 1.11 1.16 .70 1.07 .56 1.67 7.80 0.00 (1) 31.55 3.25 .79 42 .88 1.39 2.23 2.51 4.32 2.41 1.11 1.16 .70 1.07 .56 1.67 7.30 0.00 m (2) 4 26 to 86 73 34 22 23 58 45 19 139 0 592 8-12 4'? 5 3 3
.19 1.21 46 3.99 3.39 1.58 1.02 1.07 2.69 2.09 .00 6.45 0.00 27.47 I (I) 1.95 .23 .14 .14 (2) 1.95 .23 .14 .14 .19 1.21 .46 3.99 3.39 1.58 1.02 1.07 2.69 2.09 .88 6.45 0.00 27.47 0 2 2 15 39 9 3 6 27 46 20 45 0 244 13-18 23 6 0 1 (1) 1.07 .28 0.00 0.00 .05 .09 .09 .70 1.81 .42 .14 .?8 1.25 2.33 .93 2.09 0.00 11.32 (2) 1.07 .28 0.00 0.00 .05 .09 09 .70 1.01 42 .14 .28 1.25 2.13 .93 2.09 0.00 ff.32 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 3 7 17 0 39 19-24 1 0.00 1.01
.19 .05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .23 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .14 .32 .79 (1)
(2) .19 .05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .23 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .34 .32 .79 0.00 1.81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 OT 24 0 0 0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.no .f4 .05 0.00 .19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .14 .05 0.00 .19 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 s
207 88 54 63 77 135 137 232 199 82 58 54 123 !?? 111 413 0 2155 All SPEEDS (1) 9.61 4.08 2.51 2.92 3.57 6.26 6.36 10.77 9.23 3.81 2.69 2.51 5.71 5.66 5.15 19.16 0.00 100.00 (23 9.61 4.08 2.51 2.92 3.57 6.26 6.36 10.77 9.23 3.81 2.69 2.51 5.71 5.66 5.15 19.16 0.00 100.00 (1)=PFRCENT OF Al.t. GOOD OBSFRVATIONS FOR THIS PAGE (2)= PERCENT OF Al.l GnOD OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOD r.= CAtM (WIND SPEED IFSS THAN OR E00Al. TO .60 HPH)
- ~
TABLE 5A VERMONT YANKEE OCT-DEC 1992 JOINT FRE(M8ENCY DISTRIFdjTIOt4 (IIPPFR I.EVEL)
CLASS FRFOf.fENCY (PERrENT) == 0.00 297.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CLASS A NO OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS GRCdJP
i *88 "SI -tB 092 *2t '22 -08 7,82 y di f- 4- g- f- f- 4- g:
t i 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 S-5 dd id dd dd d4 dd dd dd C
l 88 dd 88 dd 88 "22 -t8 di i- ;-
'2t -tB f-
- RR g- g E
I 88 88 88 88 "RS *88 88 "RS dd is dd di d- dd dd i- 8 2
] 88 88 88 c88 -t8 *88 *88 -t8 !
id id is di 4- id di 4- ;w 88 *88 88 88 88 *88 88 88 5
_ dd id dd is di di dd dd e w
6 Coc ogg ooe I a
2 s co8 o coo *9 oo8.
9 Co8 o ogo.9 9* xx ** "
g oo Co oC CC CC Co oC CC g 3 > a 88 88 88 88 *88 88 88 88 W W dd dd 44 d4 dd dd dd is r w w 0
- BI E
- 88 88 88 *88 88 88 88 *88 t E' de dd dd dd dd dd dd dd a
& w 5 eC * *88 -t8 *88 "8: *88 *88 *88 *2t c gey dd 4- di f- di dd di f-
$ e '
W 88 88 88 *8: *88 88 88 "S5 gg
- g d d' dd dd d- dd 44 di 88 "RS d-2 W 88 -t8 88 -t8 *88 *88 e dd 4- dd 4- di dd dd i gg E
W 88 -t8 -tB 88 88 88 *88 "RS EE s$
ad s -
es s- <- dd dd dd dd i es EE 88 88 88 88 88 88 *88 88 ee t id 44 de 44 dd dd id id EE i
g =8 W 88 88 88 88 88 *88 88 88 hr.h.
i
- di id di di dd CC n B dd di dd
& ss 88 88 88 dd *88 [5 i
W *88 #88 *88 88 i g dd dd dd di dd dd dd gg 88 y2 W 88 id 88 dd 88 is id 88 *88 is id 88 *88 dd dd $$
w E a;
- 2 88 *88 88 "R2 *88 *88 *88 "ES We lgg is dd dd i- id is is i- gg
- _ .__ .__ __ _ .__ .__ .__ .__ si lt o g(t are 4: 0 __070 700 ":0 ":0 S:S wb Wen
"
- 2 t s g je
-e '
.i^
W a i ~~
i 88 50 RR: 880 "00 *8a -RE 882 g dd d- g: g: d- d- :- gd 8 88 88 *88 88 *88 88 88 *88 S 44 dd 5 id dd dd dd dd 4d c
g 88 -RE "82 285 58R *R -R8 RR8 ~
dd :- a- a d- :- g: g 8
I 88 *88 "8S '8B *88 "82 88 *8A dd is a- i- is a- is i* i 2
88 -08 88 "8S 88 *88 "R1 5 E
i l *88 sd di :- di a- di is A- ~
. ' *88 *88 "82 "82 *88 88 *88 '81 b g ad dd a- a- id 4d dd i- e g 88 88 88 *88 88 88 *88 *88 E
- f. di dd di di dd dd is di g
- f. -
> R *88 *88 -08 88 8 'd 88 88 -RE
$W dd dd :
dd dd is dd :- z
~gE w a 88 88 -RS *88 *88 88 88 -RS a
is si :- di id di 44 :- :
Ie$pE 88 88 "82 -R8 "R' -08 *88 "RK o
c gd y di id a- :- d- : -
di d*
$ E E W
88 -RS "R1 "RK *88 88 88 :R8
@ 5 8 id :- A- i- dd id di 5-
- E s
$ W, *88 -88 *RK *88 88 88 88 +8& c dd :- d- dd dd dd dd a wS wc 9m' qe W 88 *88 88 '82 88 88 *88 '8t s 8 '
id dd di d- dd dd 44 i- E*
ee
' w 88 88 88 -RS EE
> 88 88 -08 *88 E e is id di 44 di di s ' $e8 yd ev 8 W 88 -08 *88 88 88 88 88 -08 EE gE di di dd dd dd dd : gg W *88 88 -RE -RS 88 88 88 "SE $$
f y dd id :
- - dd 44 dd a gy (E $ *88 id R8-88 id 88 di 88 dd 88 di "82a gg ce
- 88 88 "8* $$
1 l! 88 88 08 *88
) gy di dd -
- - 44 dd 44 a gg L Eto. - z-- n--
I5 ve e 6:e ::e s--
- e e
- e v:e
~-- .-- .-- .--
~:e 8:-e ;Eme um s . . -
[
W"R w t.t.
$ d OS
_30_
i r , -- __
s TABLE 51) e VERMONT YANKEE OCT-DEC 1982 JOINT FRFOtJENCY DISTRIf4JTION (UPPER tEVEL) 297.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CLASS D Cl. ASS FRFOUENCY (PERCENT) = 44.13 WIND DIRECTION FRON HE ENE F ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW HNW VRBL TOTAL SPEED (MPH) N NNE O O O l O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CALM O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 o.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.On O.00 O.00 O.On O.00 O.00 t1) O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 (2) 4 9 6 14 15 3 2 4 1 1 4 11 to O 105 C-3 11 8 2 (1) 1.20 .88 .22 .44 .;99 .66 1.53 1.64 .33 .22 44 .it .11 44 1.20 1.10 0.00 31.50
.19 43 .29 .68 .72 .14 .10 .19 .05 .05 .19 .53 .48 0.00 5.07 (2) .53 .39 .10 8 39 41 19 2 5 4 4 9 36 0 195 4-7 20 3 2 1 1 1 21.36
.22 .11 .11 .88 4.27 4.49 2.08 .22 .55 .11 44 44 .99 3.94 0.00 I I til 2.19 .33 1.88 1.98 .92 .IO .24 .05 .19 .19 43 1.74 0.00 9.42 l
$I (2) .97 .14 .10 .05 .05 .39 '
4 9 20 36 48 2 3 2 8 36 19 43 0 278 I 8-12 24 17 6 1 30.45 (1) 2.63 1.86 .66 .11 44 .99 2.19 3.94 5.26 .22 .33 .22 .88 3.94 2.08 4.71 0.00 l
.82 .29 .05 .19 .43 97 1.74 2.32 .10 .14 .10 .39 1.74 .92 2.08 0.00 13.44 l (2) 1.16 2 7 21 0 2 25 62 28 49 0 221 13-18 19 2 1 0 1 1 1 24.21 (1) 2.00 .22 .11 0.00 .11 .22 .it .77 2.30 0.00 .22 .11 2.74 6.79 3.07 5.37 0.00 1
.05 .10 .05 .34 1.01 0.00 .30 .05 1.21 3.00 1.35 2.37 0.00 10.68 (2) .92 .10 .05 0.00 0 0 0 5 0 0 f 4 18 21 35 0 91 19-24 7 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .55 0.00 0.00 .11 44 1.97 2.30 3.81 0.00 9.97 (1) .77 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) .34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .24 0.00 0.00 .05 .19 .87 1.08 1.69 0.00 4.40 0 a O O O 6 0 0 1 0 4 1 7 0 23 GT 24 4 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .66 0.00 0.00 .it 0.00 .44 .It .77 0.00 2.52 (1) .43 0.00 0.00 0.00 .34 0.00 1.1I (2) .19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .29 0.00 0.00 . O'i O.00 .19 .05 6 35 25 74 99 102 6 14 7 42 128 89 180 0 913 ALL SPEEDS 95 30 11 1.64 2.74 8.11 10.84 11.17 .66 1.53 .77 4.60 14.02 9.75 19.72 0.00 300.00 (1) 9.31 3.29 1.20 .66 4.00 44.33 (2) 4.11 1.45 .53 .29 .72 1.21 3. 7St 4.78 4.93 .20 .68 .34 ?.03 6.19 4.30 P-70 (l > = PERCENT OF ALL GOOD OBSERVATIOPG FOR Titis PAGE (2)=PERr FNT OF Al L OOOD ODSERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOrt C= r4 M (WIND SFfED 1 ESS THAN OR Er(IAL TO . A3 (FH)
I
w , r ~ -- .
TABLE SE VERMONT YANVEE OCT-DEC 1982 JOINT FREOUFNCY DISTRIBUTION (UPPER LEVEL) 297.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CLASS E CIA 9S FRFOIIENCY (PERCENT) = 37.36 WIND DIRECTION FRnN N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW VRIA. TOTAI.
SPEED (MPH)
O O O O O O O O O O O CALM O O O O O O O 0.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 (1) O.00 0.On O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 29 13 to 15 9 23 17 13 11 4 4 4 6 4 9 20 0 191 (1) 3.75 1.68 1.29 1.94 1.16 2.98 2.20 1.68 1.42 .52 .52 .52 .78 .52 1.16 2.59 0.00 24.71
.63 48 .72 43 1.11 .82 .63 .53 .19 .19 .19 .29 .19 .43 .97 0.00 9.23 (2) 1.40 26 2 8 86 41 15 1 9 4 4 7 9 58 0 273 4-7 1 1 1 3S.32 (1) 3.36 .13 .13 .13 .26 1.03 11.13 5.30 1.94 .13 1.16 .52 .52 91 1.16 7.50 0.00 05 43 .19 .19 .34 43 2.80 0.00 13.19 b
w (2) 1.26 .05 .05 .05 .10 .39 4.16 1.93 .72
' 9 4 0 0 0 2 13 33 24 5 2 6 15 20 16 52 0 201 8-12 0.00 26.00 (1) 1.16 .52 0.00 0.00 0.00 .26 1.68 4.27 3.10 .65 .26 .78 1.94 2.59 2.07 6.73 0.00 0.00 .10 .63 1.59 1.16 .24 .10 .29 .72 .97 .77 2.51 0.00 9.71 (2) .43 .19 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 10 17 13 20 0 74 13-18 5 0 1 1
.13 .91 .33 0.00 0.00 1.29 2.20 1.68 2.59 0.00 9.57 l (1) .65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.58 l (2) .24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 .34 .05 0.00 0.00 48 .82 . 53 .97 0.00 0 0 4 17 0 0 2 1 2 3 0 30 19-24 0 0 0 0 0 1
.26 .39 0.00 3.8A (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .52 2.20 .13 0.00 0.00 .26 .33 0.00 0.00 .19 .82 .05 0.00 0.00 .10 .0% .10 .14 0.00 1.45 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 l OT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00 O. M O.00 0.00 0.00 .26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 .13 0.00 .13 0.00 .52 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 .19 (2) 0. N 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O. Ot 0.00 .30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 05 0.00 .05 13 16 33 316 92 76 !? 15 14 37 50 49 154 0 771 ALL 9PEEDS 69 !! il 100.00 (1) 8.93 2.33 1.42 2.07 1.42 4.27 15.01 11.90 9.83 1.55 1.94 1.01 4.79 6.47 6.34 19.92 0.00 3.33 .87 .53 .77 .53 1.59 5.61 4.45 3.67 .58 72 .68 1.79 2.42 2.37 7.44 0.00 37.36 (2)
(1)=PERCFMT OF #11. OOOD OBSERVATIONS FOR T*,flS PAGE (2)aPERCENT OF AtL GOOD ODSERVATIONS FO" sHIS FERinD .6n MPH)
En ( At M (WIND EJEED L ESr. THAN OR E0stAl Tn I
v TABLE 5F l
VERMONT YANKFE OCT-DEC 1982 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION (UPPER t.EVEl.) l CL ASS FRErAIENCY (PERCENT) = 11.99 l 297.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY Ct. ASS F j
WIND DIRECTION FROM 1 ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW VRRt. TOTAL SPEED (MPH) N NNE NE l
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CALM 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) O.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 n.00 0.00 4 4 6 6 5 5 5 2 6 2 3 5 7 9 6 79 C-3 9 1 31.85 (1) 3.63 1.61 1.61 2.42 40 2.42 2.02 2.02 2.02 .81 2.42 .81 1.21 2.02 2.82 3.63 0.00
.29 .05 .29 .24 .24 .24 .10 .29 .10 .14 .24 .34 43 0.00 3.82 (2) 43 .19 .19 7 22 16 13 3 0 0 0 2 0 30 0 115 l 4-7 11 1 0 1 1 46.37 4.44 40 0.00 40 .40 2.82 8.07 6.45 5.24 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 .81 3.23 12.10 0.00 1 (1) 5.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 .10 .39 1.45 0.00 d
8 (2) .53 .05 0.00 .05 05 .34 1.06 .77 .63 .14 0 0 5 4 14 2 2 2 2 4 1 4 12 '
53 8-12 1 0 0 (1) .40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 1.61 5.65 .81 .81 .81 .81 1.61 40 1.61 4.84 0.00 21.37
.68 .10 .10 .10 .10 .59 .05 .19 .58 0.00 2.56 (2) .05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .24 .19 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13-18 0 0 0 40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19-24 0 0 0 0 0.00 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. N) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GT 24 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 4 7 ? 18 31 35 21 7 8 4 7 8 19 51 0 248 ALL SPEEDS 21 100.00 (1) 8.47 2.02 1.61 2.82 .88 7.26 12.50 14.11 8.47 2.82 3.23 1.61 2.82 3.23 7.66 20.56 0.00
.24 .19 .34 .10 .87 1.50 1.69 t.01 .34 .39 .10 .34 .39 02 7.46 0.00 31.99 (2) 1.01 (1)=PERCFNT OF ALL C<tOD OBSERVATION 9 FOR THIS PAGE (2)= PERCENT OF ALL GOOD OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOD .60 HPHI C= cat.M (WIND SPEED 1.ESS THAN OR E0HAI. TO
d 88 *RA $3R "RE "02 *88 88 58E y && f' j' f* s' is is f: -
e 88 *88 88 88 88 *88 88 *88 2 -
8 is di di is is di is si C
[ 88 "02 "$1 R8 88 88 88 *ER -
is 2- G- 5- is es ii ;- t 6
3 88 R$ 98 88 *88 88 "$1 w is s' d' d' is is is d' 8 2
8 3
- 88 88 -R8 88 *88 *88 88 -08 8
~
- di di d' di is si is s'
. 88 88 "0S *88 *88 *88 *88 "0S $
g di is 2- di is is is 2- g
$ g 88 *88 "0S 88 *88 *88 *88 "C* $
y is is l' di && si is l' g 3 88 -28 88 R8 88 88 88 "C* E Yl yW M is d' is d' is is si s' g
=
e w
EI 3
- 88 RS *88 *88 *88 *88 "0S w
$eE' is d' A* si is is is s' i e
ap5
- 88 88 -98 N8 "02 88 *88 'Rt c gcy is is d' d' 4' is di f*
a j
a 9
M 88 *88 "0S di di J' 88 88 *88 *88 "CS di di di J*
e E 5 E
W *88 88 "0 "$1 '88 88 *88 *SK c is is s' i' is is is f
- wy W *88 88 -RS 88 88 88 88 -28 !E 8& "a w
di is d' && si di id d' C2 55 d d
- 88 *88 *88 88 88 *88 88 88 h c si di is is is si si si lee e -e 8 i W *88 *88 w
88 *88 *88 88 88 *88 Bs a 3 di is di di dd is di is C;
& 88 W 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 *88 E5 l y is is is si di di di di ??C6 yS W *88 *88 88 *88 *88 *88 *88 88 a .
=
si is is is is is is si 55 m a om ye gy z
88 -N8 di d' 88 di 88 88 is 88 *88 -R8 da di is d' gg
.-- .-- .- 1; lr--
n-- ~--
s--
g0 -
r l
1t W
C s'
s a
d:0 0
a:0 4:0 7:0 o 7:0 ?:" ":0 m:
O t E W ww EE tt
" w 11 s
b i CU
, r--, _ _
TABLE SH VERMONT YANKEE OCT-TAEC 1982 JOINT FRE0fENCY DISTRIBUTION (UPPER LEVEL)
STADILITY Ct. ASS ALL C1 ASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 100.00 297.0 FT WIND DATA .
WIND DIRECTION FROM ,
E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW VRBt . TOTAL SPEED (MPH) N NNE NE ENE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,
CALM o 0 0 0 0 0 '
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38 34 20 9 15 7 to 13 28 42 0 389 l C-3 50 26 16 26 19 36 1.84 1.64 97 43 .72 .34 48 .63 1.35 2.03 0.00 18.80 2.42 1.26 .77 1.26 .92 1.74 (1) 1.26 .92 1.74 1.04 1.64 .97 .43 .72 .J4 48 .63 1.35 2.03 0.00 18.80 (2) 2.42 1.26 .77 103 8 15 7 12 15 29 129 0 623 4-7 58 6 4 3 5 25 154 50 30.11 2.80 .29 .19 .14 .24 1.21 7.44 4.98 2.42 .39 .72 .34 .58 .72 1.40 6.23 0.00 I (1) 30.11
't.21 7.44 4.93 2.42 .79 .72 .34 .58 .72 1.40 6.23 0.00 d (2) 2.80 .29 .19 .14 .24 4 20 41 93 79 9 8 to 29 57 44 120 0 580 8-12 37 21 7 1 28.03 (1) 1.79 1.01 .34 .05 .19 .97 1.98 4.49 3.82 .43 .39 48 1.40 2.75 2.13 5.80 0.00 1.98 4.49 3.82 43 .39 .48 1.40 2.75 2.13 5.80 0.00 28.03 (2) 1.79 1.01 .34 .05 .19 .97 2 0 34 1 2 1 35 82 43 78 0 315 13-18 24 2 1 0 1 1 15.22 (1) 1.16 .10 .05 0.00 .05 .10 .05 .39 1.64 .05 .10 .05 1.69 3.96 2.08 3.77 0.00
.05 .39 1.64 .05 .10 .05 1.69 3.96 2.00 3.77 0.00 15.22 (2) 1.16 .10 .05 0.00 .05 .10 0 4 23 0 1 6 19 25 47 0 133 19-24 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 6.43
.19 1.11 .05 0.00 .05 .29 .92 1.21 2.27 0.00 (1) .34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .92 1.21 2.27 0.00 6.43 (2) .34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .19 1.11 05 0.00 .05 .29 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 5 1 10 0 29 OT 24 4 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .39 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 .24 .05 48 0.00 1.40 (1) .19 0.00 .05 48 0.00 1.40
.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .39 0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 .24 (2) 234 242 214 29 40 27 92 191 170 426 0 2069 All. SPEEDS 180 55 28 30 29 83 100.00 1.45 1.40 4.01 11.31 11.70 10.34 1.35 1.93 1.30 4.45 9.23 0.22 20.59 0.00 (1) 8.70 2.66 1.35 4.45 9.23 8. 7 ?O.59 0.00 100.00 (2) R.70 2.66 1.35 1.45 1.40 4.01 11.31 11.70 10.34 1.35 1.93 1.30 (1)= PERCENT OF ALL GOOD ODeFRVATIONS FOR THIS f' ACE (2)= PERCENT OF ALL GOOD OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PFR10D .60 1PH)
C= CALM (WIND SPFED L E% THAN OR EOttAt. TO
v -
TABLE 6 VERMOIC YANXEE QUARTERLY AVERAGE X/Q, D/Q AND GAMMA X/Q '
VALUES FOR SELECTED RECEPTORS 1 THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER POINT OF INTEREST WN'i 2415 meters Location: WNW 2415 meters A. Maximum offsite ground Location:
X/Q (undepleted): 5.228 x 10-7 level air concentration X/Q (undepleted)*: 7.825 x 10-7 X/Q (depleted)*: 7.794 x 10-7 X/Q (depleted): 5.207 x 10-7 location 1.093 x 10-9 3/Q**: 1.483 x 10-9 D/Q:
3.184 x 10-7 Gamma X/Q: 2.111 x 10-7 Gamma X/Q:*
B. For whole body and skin doses from noble gases S 0.25 miles location: S 0.25 miles
- 1) Maximum site boundary Location:
X/Q (undepleted): 4.17 x 10-10 location X/Q (undepleted): 7.46 x 10-10 X/Q (depleted): 7.46 x 10-10 X/Q (depleted): 4.17 x 10-10 3.82 x 10-12 D/Q: 2.34 x 10-12
, D/Q: 6.49 x 10-7 y Gamma X/Q: 7.12 x 10-7 Gamma X/Q:
1 S 0.34 miles Location: S 0.34 miles
- 2) Maximum nearest Location X/Q (undepleted): 4.94 x 10-9 X/Q (undepleted): 1.74 x 10-9 l residence 1.74 x 10-9 X/Q (depleted): 4.94 x 10-9 X/Q (depleted):
2.14 x 10-11 D/Q: 9.68 x 10-12 D/Q: 4.73 x 10-7 Gamma X/Q: 5.22 x 10-7 Gamma X/Q:
TABLE 6 (continued)
THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER ,
POINT OF INTEREST C. For organ doset, from i iodine and particulates j in gaseous effluents l l
Location: WNW 1.9 niles Location: WNW 1.9 miles I
- 1) Maximum farm location (GI, Thyroid, Whole Body X/Q (undepleted): 5.71 x 10-7 X/Q (undepleted): 3.81 x 10- l X/Q (depleted): 5.65 x 10-7 X/Q (depleted): 3.77 x 10-7 D/Q: 1.06 x 10-9 D/Q: 7.78 x 10-10 Gamma X/Q: 2.48 x 10-7 Gamma X/Q: 1.64 x 10-7 Location: SSE 3.5 miles (Bone)
X/Q (undepleted): 2.65 x 10-7 X/Q (depleted): 2.60 x 10-7 1 1.06 x 10-9 l Y D/Q: I Gamma X/Q: 1.68 x 10-7 Location: SSE 1.3 miles Location: SSE 1.3 miles
- 2) Maximum nearest X/Q (undepleted): 7.92 x 10-8 residence X/Q (undepleted): 7.78 x 10-8 X/Q (depleted): 7.76 x 10-8 X/Q (depleted): 7.90 x 10-8 D/Q: 4.26 x 10-10 D/Q: 5.70 x 10-10 i Gamma X/Q: 2.71 x 10-7 Gamma X/Q: 2.58 x 10-7 SSE 0.53 miles Location: SSE 0.53 miles
- 3) Maximum site boundary Location: .
1.89 x 10-8 location X/Q (undepleted): 3.41 x 10-8 X/Q (undepleted):
X/Q (depleted): 3.41 x 10-8 X/Q (depleted): 1.89 x 10-8 D/Q: 2.07 x 10-10 D/Q: 1.70 x 10-10 Gamma X/Q: 5.23 x 10-7 Gamma X/Q: 4.91 x 10-7 3
- Depleted and undepleted X/Qs and Gamma X/Q are in units of sec./m
- Delta (D/Q) in units of 1/m2
llI ,! l 1l)1 lIl if )l l lllllll H ) )
T s s s RE e e e UST s
) l l OON a i i FDE e m m m M l 5 DRT e 1 5 4 EEI r 4 2 22 3 22 TTM 2 22 ARM d - - - - - -
MAO i ,
00 0 00 0 00 IUC u q
W N
11 11 1 1 TQ xx xx S xx S i W S E l t 40 t 22 t 87 o a a a
( 73 ( 99 ( 66 N
) )
D s s N R e e A n IE s ) l l Moi HST e i i 2 TON s m t DE a 5 m m N 8 D M e 1 O ta91 ERT l 4 5 2 11 4
3 22 T S , TEI e 2 12 C r ATM r - -
00 0 00 0 00 A s MRM W 11 11 1 1 P e r IAO d ,
TUC i N ,
xx Mwote I SQ u W xx S xx S P r E q t 77 i t 27 t 00 7A L r a u l
(
a 14 (
a 11 (
a 77 C aQ EI e o LG l N BOc r h.
AL u r TOI N uo D eF A e R k d nn F a a OY d t r Y
Rni A oh -
g MmT r n n s u
M o U e di nv ot s ti t o S V E ai t n u at a e R e i o a s U yc sod e sc sea ecg S d em epn s eo s n O oro s una )
sl o e ) oee )
P b r ot oog ddl m X mf d ari m d yl m E eo gt e e rb e ib e l rs . nd al r nao r nso r F of y) i eerb m i d n m ien m O h am kst t o ( k n s ( kr (
wswe soinn ) suet ) s e )
pse my ovn my t v my E eh r dbI e ed d si ed P l st m d xf ce ed r o Y aoa( nef nv ro n t u ro net mb T ud p a ooi m l' aecl mb arc aa (
d s s ct ( t af (
R i nee yl m c e yi of e yeo . e vars d auras nl d sie nl d nis nl O i o o d i o o d t i o i gua oumiot kh b man k h Y d rse bdi ain kh bmas A nool i x d e SW uru o SW ure u SW W i pe eval au em em l i ml H l xr l i merl l ime T mae od v f . oxos . oxof h arf . 1 A uc d h nf eff .1 hara 1 1 1 P miri Wiol oe 1 1 Wmf g 11 Wmf e it eu L xit q .
A arai .
B C I Mcwl A T
N
- E T
O . I P I I i$'
ll jI
TABLE 7 (continued) l ESTIMATED THIRD ESTIMATED FOURTH POTENTIAL PATINAY OR TYPE OF EXPOSURE QUARTER DOSE QUARTER DOSE COMMITMENT COMMITMENT III. Organ doses to individuals f rom radioactive iodine and particulates in gaseous effluents (including tritium).
A Maximum farm location l
Maximum individual whole body and organ doses f rom all pathways (at WNW, 1.9 miles) (at SSE, 3.5 miles)*1 (at WNW, 1.9 miles)*2
- 1. Bone (mrem) 2.2 x 10-4 (child) 1.3 x 10-4
' 11. Thyroid (mrem) 1.0 x 10-3 child) 7.0 x 10-4 (child)*1 111. GI(LLI) (mrem) 9.5 x 10-4( (child) 7.0 x 10-4 (ch11d)*2 iv. Whole body (mrem) 9.6 x 10-4 (child) 7.0 x 10-4(child)*2 (child)*2 B. Critical organ doses to maximum nearest resident from the j inhalation, ingestion and ground plane exposure of iodine (at SSE, 1.3) (at SSE, 1.3) and particulates
- 1. Bone (mrem) 8.0 x 10-5 (child) 6.6 x 10-5 (child)
- 11. Thyroid (mrem) 1.5 x 10-4 (child) 1.6 x 10-4 (child) 111. GI(LLI) (mrem) 1.5 x 10-4 (child) 1.6 x 10-4 (child) iv. Whole body as critical organ (mrem) 1.5 x 10-4 (child) 1.6 x 10-4 (child)
TABLE 7 (continued)
ESTIMATED THIRD ESTIMATED FOURTH POTENTIAL PATHWAY OR TYPE OF EXPOSURE QUARTER DOSE QUARTER DOSE ,
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT C. Organ doses to individuals at point of maximum ground level air concentration of gaseous effluents from inhalation and ground exposure of iodine and particulates (at WNW, 2415m) (at WNW, 2415m)
- 1. Bone (mrem) 2.2 x 10-4 1.1 x 10-4 all) 4.3 x 10-4 teen,
((all) adult) 2.8 x 10-4 ((teen, adult)
- 11. Thyroid (mrem) 4.2 x 10-4 (teen, adult) 2.8 x 10-4 (teen, adult) 111. GI(LLI) (mrem) 4.2 x 10-4 (teen, adult) 2.8 x 10-4 (teen, adult) tv. Whole body as critical organ (mrem)
J
, D. Organ doses to individuals at g point of maximum site boundary I air concentration of gaseous etsluents f rom inhalation and ground exposure of iodine and particulates (at SSE, 0.53 miles) (at SSE, 0.53 miles)
- 1. Bone (mrem) 3.0 x 10-5 (all) 1.8 x 10-5
- 11. Thyroid (mrem) 3.9 x 10-5 (teen, adult) 2.4 x 10-5 (ati) 2.4 x 10-5 (teen, adult) 111. GI(LLI) (mrem) 3.9 x 10-5 (teen, adult) 3.9 x 10-5 (teen, adult) 2.4 x 10-5 (teen, (teen, adult) adult) iv. Whole body as critical organ (mrem)
TABLE 7 (continued)
ESTIMATED THIRD ESTIMATED FOURTH POTENTIAL PATHWAY OR TYPE OF EXPOSURE QUARTER DOSE QUARTER DOSE COMMITMENT COMMITMENT IV. Whole body doses to individuals and populations in unrestricted areas from direct radiation f rom the facility.
l l
A. Maximum site boundary (mrem)
(west of turbine 3.6 butiding) 3.4 B. Population dose (person-rem) 1.9 x 10-2 2.0 x 10-2 V. Whole body dose to the population from all receiving-water related pathways from liquid releases. No liquid releases (person-rem): No liquid releases l
ESTIMATED TT AD ESTIMATED FOURTH POTENTIAL PATHWAY OR TYPE OF EXPOSURE QUARTER DOSE QUARTER DOSE e
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT VI.
A. Whole body doses to the population and average individual out to 50 miles from noble gaseous effluents
- 1. Whole body dose to population
( pe rson-rem) 0.81 0.70
- 11. Average individual whole body dose (mrem) 7.1 x 10- 6.1 x 10-4 111. Skin dose to population (person-rem) 1.8 1.5 L iv. Average individual skin dose 1.6 x 10-3 1.3 x 10-3 7 (arem)
B. Organ doses to 50 mile popula-tion, and average individual, from inhalation, ingestion of milk, meat, and vegetables, and ground exposure to iodine and parti-culates in gaseous effluents
- 1. Thyroid population dose (person-rem) 7.2 x 10-3 6.7 x 10-3
- 11. Average individual thyroid dose (mrem) 6.3 x 10-6 5.8 x 10-6 111. Whole body population dose (person-rem) 7.0 x 10-3 6.7 x 10-3 iv. Average individual whole body dose (mrem) 6.1 x 10-6 5.8 x 10-6
f APPENDIX A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT Supplemental Information .
July - December 1982 Facility: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Licensee: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation
- 1. Regulatory Limits
- a. Fission and activation gases: 0.08/E YCi/sec.
- b. Iodines: 0.48 uC/sec.
- c. Particulates, half-lives >8 days: 1.6E+3 MPC 8 uCi/sec.
-7
- d. Liquid effluents: 1 x 10 uCi/ml
-3 uCVml, dissolved Noble gases:
(HTO: 3 x 10 4 x 10-S uCVml). Isotopic limits are found in 10CFR20 App. B, Table II, Column 2.
- 2. Maximum Permissible Concentrations Provided below are the MPC's used in determining allowable release rates or concentrations.
- a. Fission and activation gases: No MPC limits
- c. Particulates, half-lives >8 days: See 10CFR20, App. B, Table II, Column 1.
- d. Liquid effluents: See 10CFR20, App. B, Table II, Column 2.
- 3. Average Energy Provided below are the average energy (E) of the radionuclide mixture in releases of fission and activation gasses, if applicable.
- a. Average gamma energy: 3rd Quarter 1.10 MeV/ Dis.
4th Quarter 1.08 MeV/ Dis.
l
-Al-
- b. Average beta energy: Not Applicable 4 Measurements and Approximations of Total Radioactivity Provided below are the methods used to measure or approximate the total radioactivity in effluents and the methods used to determine radionuclide composition.
- a. Fission and Activation Gases Daily samples are drawn at the discharge of the air ejector.
Isotopic breakdown of the releases are determined from these samples. A logarithmic chart of the stack gas monitor is read daily to determine the gross release rate. At the very low release rates normally encountered during operation with the augmented off gas system the error of release rates may be approximately 1,100%,
- b. Iodines Continuous isokinetic samples are drawn from the plant stack through a particulate filter and charcoal cartridge. The filters and cartridge are removed weekly (if releases are less than 4% of the Tech Spec limit), or daily (if they are greater than 4% of the limit), and are analyzed foe radioiodine 131, 132, 132, 134: and q
135. The iodines found on the filter are added to those on the charcoal cartridge. The error involved in these steps may be approximately 1,50%.
- c. Particulates The particulate filters described in b. above are also counted for particulate radioactivity. The error involved in this sample is also approximately 1,50%.
l
-A2-
, d. Liquid Effluents Radioactive liquid effluents released from the f acility are continuously monitored. Measurements are also made on a representative sample of each batch of radioactive liquid effluents released. For each batch, station records are retained of the total activity (mci) released, concentration (uCi/ml) of gross radioactivity, volume (liters), and approximate total quantity of water (liters) used to dilute the liquid effluent prior to release to the Connecticut River.
Each batch of radioactive liquid effluent released is analyzed for grose gamma and gamma isotopic radioactivity. A monthly proportional composite sample, comprising an aliquot of each batch released during a month, is also analyzed for tritium, SR-89, SR-90, gross beta and gross alpha radioactivity, in addition to gamma spectroscopy.
There were no liquid releases during the reporting period.
- 5. Batch Releases o
- a. Liquid There were no routine liquid batca releases during the reporting period.
q 1
- b. Gaseous There were no routine daseous batch releases during the reporting ,
period.
i
-A3-
- 6. Abnormal Releases
- a. Liquid There were no non-routine liquid releases during the reporting
, period.
- b. Gaseous There were no non-routine gaseous releases during the reporting period.
1 1
-A4-
- - . - _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ __