ML20071D281
| ML20071D281 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1983 |
| From: | ILLINOIS POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20071D255 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0853, RTR-NUREG-853 NUDOCS 8303090315 | |
| Download: ML20071D281 (36) | |
Text
.
EVALUATION OF CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY
~_
DURING A POSTULATED RELEASE OF 2OXIC MATERIALS SHIPPED BY RAIL (Safety Evaluation Report-Outstanding Issue No. 1)
Illinois Power Company Clinton Power Station - Unit 1 3
e 8303090315 830304 PDR ADOCK 05000461 E
P TABLE OF CONTENTS i
.t Page 4
i I.
INTRODUCTION 1
II.
EVALUATION 1
III.
CONCLUSION 13
' IV.
REFERENCES 14 1
LIST OF TABLES 15
[
LIST OF FIGURES 16 3
'f 4
E k
i a
i i
J
.._.,.-..-_-,,,_.,.-.,_..,..,_m,.._..,__,,,__,.-....._,__
.-_,_.... _.. _, m
I.
INTRODUCTION Illinois Power (IP) is required to provide for the Clinton Power Ctation (CPS) a control room from which actions can be taken to operate the nuclear power unit safely under normal conditions and to maintain it in a safe condition under accident conditions.
The release of hazardous chemicals can potentially result in the control room becoming uninhabitable.
Therefore, it is important_to assess the habitability and protection of the control room during and after a postulated external release of hazardous chemicals.
On this basis, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has required an evaluation of the risks associated with rail transportation of hazardous materials in the vicinity of the CPS.
The NRC position was stated in Reference 1, the_ CPS Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-0853, Outstanding Issue No.
1):
"The nearest railroad is a line of the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad which runs parallel to State Route 54 and traverses the site approximately 0.75 mi (1.21 km) north of the station.
The Illinois Central Gulf Railroad also has a line approximately 3.5 mi (5.6 km) south of the station.
The hazards associated with rail transportation of toxic and explosive materials are still being evaluated.
Based on 1976 and 1980 transportation data obtained from Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, the applicant has identified several materials requiring further analysis.
These will be addressed in a future SER supplement."
This report evaluates the hazards associated with rail transportation of toxic materials.
It demonstrates that the toxic materials shipped near the CPS present no significant risk to control room habitability.
II.
EVALUATION RAIL LINES - The rail lines in the vicinity of the CPS are shown in Figure 1.
The two lines being considered are owned and operated by the Illinois Central Gulf (ICG) Railroad.
The ICG line approximately 3.5 miles south of the station is not used to transport hazardous materials.
Therefore, no additional evaluation of this line will be made.
- Further, the railroad is considering abandoning this line.
The ICG line parallel to State Route 54, the Gilman Line, is used to transport numerous commodities including hazardous materials..
SHIPMENT SURVEY -
IP performed a comprehensive survey of the Gilman Line from ICG shipping records for the period of-December 1, 1981 to November 30, 1982.. Hazardous materials were identified;on shipping records by a 49-series Standard Transportation Commodity Code number.
Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that hazardous materials must be itemized on all shipping records.. Therefore, this survey of hazardous materials was totally inclusive.
" Hazardous materials" is a shipping category which includes toxic materials.
In this evaluation, for conservatism, all hazardous materials were initially considered toxic and then examined individually to determine if an actual health hazard existed.
A summary of all' hazardous materials shipped'on the Gilman Line during the time period surveyed.is given in Table l!
SHIPPING FREQUENCY - Regulatory Guide 1.78 (Reference 2) requires a control room habitability evaluation for hazardous materials shipped by rail with a frequency of thirty or more times per year.. There were nineteen hazardous materials' shipped at least thirty times per year on the ICG Gilman-Line near CPS.
These chemicals are listed in Table 2.
CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY - In this analysis, chemicals not sufficiently toxic to threaten control room habitability were eliminated on the basis of published toxicity. data and criteria listed in Regulatory Guide 1.78.
Any remaining chemicals were subjected to a diffusion analysis as described in Regulatory Guide 1.78.
The Architect-Engineer, Sargent & Lundy, has developed the HAZCHEM computer program which utilizes this diffusion analysis to calculate the concentration in the control room of a chemical released a specified distance.from the ventilation intake.
The calculated control room concentration is then compared to the maximum concentration tolerable by human beings for an acute exposure to determine whether the chemical would cause the control room to be uninhabitable if a shipment quantity was released.
There are two HAZCHEM programs:
one program is applicable to materials that are gaseous at ambient conditions and one program evaluates the spill of a liquid.
The following assumptions are included in the program for gaseous releases:
1.
Instantaneous spill of total contents of a tank containing the chemical.
2.
Ground release of tank car contents. -
3.
Control room intake is modeled as being directly downwind of the point of chemical release with no intervening structures.
4.
The chemical is a gas at the input temperature and 14.7 psia but is stored or transported as a liquid under pressure.
5.
Instantaneous release results in a puff of finite volume described by the puff model for atmospheric dilution in Appendix B of Regulatory Guide 1.78.
6.
The diffusion equation for an instantaneous (puff) ground level release.used in the program was taken directly from Appendix B of Regulatory Guide 1.78.
The "y" and "z" terms in the diffusion equation were assumed to be zero.
This assumption centers the puff at the control room intake in the horizontal crosswind and vertical directions.
The relationship x = D - ut as defined in Appendix B of Regulatory Guide 1.78 was directly substituted for the "x"
term in the equation.
7.
The value calculated by the equation represents the chemical concentration at the intake to the control room.
The program uses the concentration at the intake and the control room ventilation characteristics to determine the chemical concentration inside the control room.
Concentration levels are calculated for various equally spaced wind speeds up to the maximum wind speed supplied as inputs into the program.
The HAZCHEM program for liquid spills uses the diffusion equation of Regulatory Guide 1.78 in the same manner as the program for gaseous releases.
The same assumptions apply, except the chemical is assumed to be a liquid at ambient conditions.
The mass of chemical vaporized is calculated as a function of the spill radius, molecular weight, density, vapor pressure, molecular diffusivity in air of the chemical, and ambient temperature and pressure.
The spill radius may be input directly or calculated by the program from input values for spill thickness, chemical surface tension, viscosity, density and diffusivity.
As in the HAZCHEM gas program, all necessary chemical properties, weather conditions, and ventilation values are given as inputs to the program.
As can be seen from the description of the HAZCHEM model, the assumptions made in the analysis are very conservative.
The basic idea is, that if the accident occurs, it will occur in the worst possible way, and under the worst possible meteorological conditions, such that the effects on the control room habitability will be worse than what would be anticipated. -,, -.
-,w,a
BUTANE, PROPYLENE, AND BUTENE Toxicity information was obtained from Irving Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials (third edition),
one of the most widely accepted toxicity r9ferences (Reference 3).
Regulatory Guide 1.78 states that simple asphyxiants (defined by Sax as chemicals that have no specific toxic effects but act by displacing oxygen in the lungs) may be eliminated from consideration unless "a significant fraction of the control room air could be displaced as a result of their release".
According to Sax, up to -a third of the air. in a room can be displaced by a simple asphyxiant before a human being will experience adverse effects.
If released, none of the asphyxiants on Table 2 will enter the control room in sufficient amounts to displace one-third of the air.
Butane and propylene are described by Sax as simple asphyxiants and can be eliminated from further consideration.
Toxicity information for butene (Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Butene Gas Liquefied)]
was taken from Matheson Gas Data Bock (Reference 4).
The reference describes the various type's of butene (1-butene, 2 -butene, etc.) as simple asphyxiants.
On the basis of this information, butene was also eliminated.
ISOBUTANE, PROPANE, AND LPG Several chemicals were eliminated from consideration on the basis of toxicity information in Sax's reference.
Sax evaluates the toxicity of each chemical on the basis of a numerical scale ranging from 1 to 3 where 1 = slight toxicity, 2 = moderate toxicity, and 3 = severe toxicity.
Sax also gives threshold limit values (TLV) for many chemicals, indicating the maximum concentration of a chemical to which a human can be safely exposed for several hours daily over long periods of time.
The toxicity limit for an acute exposure (as in the case of a toxic chemical spill) would be much higher than the TLV.
Any chemicals with an acute systemic toxicity rating of only 1 due to inhalation or as an irritant were not considered sufficiently toxic to warrant further investigation.
Chemicals with a toxicity rating of 1 are slightly toxic.
They cause slight changes which are readily reversible and disappear after the end of the exposure.
Isobutane and propane met this qualification.
A toxicity rating was not given for liquid petroleum gas (described by Sax as
" Toxicity:
unknown.
May act as a simple asphyxiant").
However, Sax listed a TLV for liquid petroleum gas (LPG) of 1000 ppm, which is equal to that of propane and implies a high threshold of human tolerance.
Therefore, LPG was not considered to be sufficiently toxic to warrant further analysis.
SULFURIC ACID, MONOETHANOLAMINE, CORROSIVE LIQUID N.O.S.*,
AND SODIUM NITRATE Regulatory Guide 1.78 states that liquids with vapor pressures less than 10 torr may be eliminated from further consideration.
Sulfuric acid, monoethanolamine, and corrosive liquid n.o.s.
(either sulfuric acid or sodium hydroxide) all have vapor pressures less than 10 torr at 100'F.
Sodium nitrate was climinated from consideration because it is a solid at ambient temperatures.
PROPYLENE OXIDE, VINYL ACETATE AND CARBON TETRACHLORIDE Propylene oxide, vinyl acetate and carbon tetrachloride are toxic materials and were therefore evaluated by the HAZCHEM.
program.
The HAZCHEM results showed that insufficient amounts of any of the three chemicals would reach the control room following a railcar spill to be hazardous for acute exposures (see Table 3).
PETROLEUM NAPHTHA AND FORMALDEHYDE Petroleum naphtha is a mixture of hydrocarbons which, from a DOT classification (Reference 7), consists of pentane, hexane and heptane.
The largest shipment of petroleum naphtha was 97 tons.
The HAZCHEM program was run for 97 ton release of each of the three hydrocarbons.
Insufficient amounts of any of the three hydrocarbons would reach the control room following a railcar spill to be hazardous (see Table 3).
Formaldehyde is a gas, but is shipped an aqueous solution between 37% and 50%.
The 37% solution is known as formalin and is the most common form of shipment.
The largest shipment of formaldehyde solution was 98 tons.
The HAZCHEM program was run for 98 ton releases of the 37% and 50%
solutions.
Insufficient amounts of either of the solutions would reach the control room following a railcar spill to be hazardous (see Table 3).
DENATURED ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOL N.O.S.
Denatured alcohol is a generic category that includes mixtures of ethyl alcohol with any of a wide number of denaturants.
Usually, the weight percentage of ethyl
- N.O.S. = Not otherwise specified (in the Standard Transporation Commodity Code).,
alcohol falls w'. thin the range of 80 to 99%.
Alcohol n.o.s.
was described in the railroad shipment data as " ethyl alcohol, anhydrous, denatured in part with petroleum products and/or chemicals, not to exceed 5%."
Because alcohol n.o.s. seems to be nothing more than denatured alcohol with a maximum limit placed on denaturant concentrations, the two alcohol groups were evaluated under the common category of denatured alcohol.
The maximum car weight in either category is 100 tons.
The HAZCHEM program, was run for a 100 ton release of pure ethyl alcohol.
The ethyl alcohol was shown to present no toxic -hazard to the control room operator (see Table 3);
therefore, an investigation of the toxicity of the specific denaturants used in each type ofidenatured alcohol was required.
The toxicity of a denaturant mixed with ethyl alcohol should not exceed the toxicity of the same denaturant in its pure form.
The toxicity literature (References 3,13) for denatured alcohol supports this statement by referring the reader to toxicity information for the individual denaturants.
Because the ICG Railroad was unable to provide information on the composition of denatured alcohol shipped on the Gilman Line, all types of denaturants were evaluated.
Several suppliers of denatured alcohol were contacted and asked to provide information on the denaturants used in their products.
Several dozen chemicals were found to be used as denaturants; however, many are added to ethyl alcohol in quantities less than 1% by weight and were therefore eliminated from consideration.
Of the denaturants used in quantities greater than 1%, the following are considered to be toxic chemicals.
Maximum Percent by Weight Found in Denatured Chemicals Alcohol Literature Benzene 5.27%
Butyl Alcohol 2.79%
Chloroform 8.5%
Ethyl Ether 8.15%
Formaldehyde 4.37%
Heptane 5%
Methyl Alcohol 17%
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 5%
Toluene 5.07%
Raoult's Law states that the partial pressure of a component in a solution can be approximated by the product of the vapor pressure of the pure component and the mole fraction of the component in solution.
Therefore, the rates of evaporation of the denaturants listed above should vary with
. l
the vapor pressure of the pure denaturant and the weight percent in the denatured alcohol solution.
The denaturant with the highest vapor pressure in its pure form would be expected.to result in the highest control room concentrations when released as part of a denatured alcohol solution.
A HAZCHEM computer run was performed for the release of only the denaturant with the highest vapor pressure.
Releases of varying quantities corresponding to the varying weight percents of each denaturant were evaluated.
The calculated concentration at the control room intake for the denaturant with the highest vapor pressure was compared with the toxicity limit for acute exposure for each of the denaturants on the preceding. list.
If the calculated concentration of the worst case denaturant did not exceed the toxicity limit for any of the nine denaturants under consideration, then denatured alcohol could be determined to be non-hazardous to control room habitability.
Formaldehyde in its pure form would have the highest vapor pressure of the nine denaturants under consideration; however, a chemical manufacturer provided the information (Reference 9) that only solutions of. formaldehyde in water (usually 37% formaldehyde) would be added to alcohol as denaturants.
A formaldehyde-water solution has a lower vapor pressure than ethyl alcohol and would not be expected to evaporate rapidly.
Methyl alcohol, therefore, has the highest vapor pressure of the nine denaturants under investigation.
A HAZCHEM run was completed for releases of methyl alcohol in quantities corresponding to the maximum weight percents of each denaturant.
The toxicity limits were not exceeded for any of the nine denaturants-(see Table 4).
Therefore, denatured alcohol and alcohol n.o.s. have been determined to present no toxic hazards to the Clinton control room.
ANHYDROUS AMMONIA AND BROMINE Anhydrous ammonia and bromine, the only chemicals remaining from Table 2, are toxic and were evaluated by the HAZCHEM program.
The HAZCHEM results showed that either chemical renders the control room uninhabitable if a railcar containing the maximum shipment quantity should spill its entire contents.
These two chemicals required further evaluation to determine if a significant probability existed for an unacceptable transportation accident. l
PROBABILITY RISK ASSESSMENT - Reference 10 (NUREG-0800),
Section 2.2.3) provides criteria for determining if a toxic release need be considered a design basis event.
Specifically, NUREG-0800 states:
"The probability of occurrence of the initiating events leading to potential consequences in excess of 10 CFR Part 100 exposure g'lidelines should be estimated using assumptions that are as representative of the specific site as is practicable.
In addition, because of the low probabilities of the events under consideration, data are often not available to permit accurate calculation of probabilities.
Accordingly, the expected rate of occurrence of potential exposures in excess of the 10_gFR Part 100 guidelines of approximately 10 per year is acceptable if, when combined with reasonable qualitative arguments, the realistic probability can be shown to be lower."
The risk assessment analysis in this report employs two conservative and cross-checking methods to calculate the probability of a railcar rupture and toxic material release serious enough to affect the habitability of the CPS Control Room.
The first probability calculation is a function of the probability of release per car mile and the shipping frequency in cars per year.
The probability of releases per year of a railcar carrying hazardous materials is:
Pa = Pr(C) x F(C) x]h L(D) x Pw(D)
(1)
D=1 where:
Pa = probability of accident (releases) year Pr (C) = probability of release [releasesl car mile F (C) = frequency of shipment [ca s)
L(D) = length of track under consideration (function of wind direction)
[mi.lesl Pw(D) probability that a wind of any stability
=
class and any velocity class is blowing in a direction such that a toxic chemical release is carried toward the control room air intake (function of wind direction) (dimensionless]
D is the direction from which the wind is blowing (W,
l WNW, etc.).
Only those eight wind directions from l
which a wind could blow from the railroad towards the plant were included (see Figure 2).
The second probability calculation is a function of the probability of release per ton mile and the shipping frequency in tons per year.
The probability of release per year of a railcar carrying hazardous material is:
Pa = Pr(T) x F(T) x L(D) x Pw(D) (2) where:
Pa, L(D), Pw (D), and D are as defined before and, Pr(T) = probability' of relehse [fe eases)
~ __
tons F(T) = frequency of shipment [ year)
For the purpose of the probability calculations, minor releases are excluded because they do not threaten control room habitability.
The release probabilities used include major releases; those releases expected to threaten control room habitability by being capable of causing at least $5000 in damages (loss of lading, property damage, cleanup crew, etc.).
The assumption of using accident frequencies with damages of at least $5000 is reasonable since nearly all hazardous materials are shipped in quantities which are worth at least S5000.
Loss of lading alone would exceed the
$5000 criteria, exclusive of damage or emergency response effort costs.
From Tables 5 and 6, anhydrous ammonia, classified as a non-flammable gas, has accident (release) frequencies of:
Pr(C) = 0.019 x 10 greleases)
-6 car mile Pr(T) = 0.27 x 10~9 [ releases) ton mile From Table 2, anhydrous ammonia has shipping frequencies of:
F (C) = 37 [ cars) year F(T) = 3,119
[ tons) year From Table 7:
- L (D) x Pw(D) = 0.5769 [ miles].
Using equation (1), the probability of an anh'drous ammonia
/
release is:
8 Pa = Pr(D) x F(C) x l~
L(D)'x Pw(D)
(1)
D=1 Substituting data:
releases] x 37 [ year] x 0.5769 miles
-6 cars Pa = 0.019 x 10 gcar mile
= 4.06 x 10-7(releases) year Using-equation (2), the probability of an anhydrous ammonia release is:
8 i
P
=Pr (T) x F(T) x}[ L(D) x P (D)
(2) a
~
D' Substituting data:
P
= 0.27 x 10-9 [ releases] x 3119 [ year] x 0.5769 miles tons a
ton mile
= 4.86 x 10
[re eases)
~
year Similar calculations are made for bromine.
From Tables 5 and 6, bromine, classified as a corrosive, has accident (release) frequencies of:
Pr (C) = 0.090 x 10-6 [
3 e
a i
-9 [rele ses) l PR(T) = 1.10 x 10 1
ton mile From Table 2, bromine has shipping frequencies of:
cars F(C) = 34 [ year) f F (T) tons
= 1,340 (year)
From Table 7:
8 (D) x Pw(D) = 0.5769 miles Using equation (1), the probability of a bromine release is:
Pa = Pr(C) x F(C) x L(D) x Pw(D)
(1)
~
D=1 l
6 -
Substituting Data:
-6 e
Pa = 0.090 x 10 g
) x 34 [c rs] x 0.5769 miles a
i
= 1.77 x 10-6(releases) year Using equation (2), the probability of a bromine release is:
~
Pa = Pr(T) x F(T) x L(D) x Pw(D)
(2)
D=1 Substituting data:
\\
Pa = 1.10 x 10-9 [ releases] x 1,340 [ye"ar] x t
8
~~
ton mile
["*f*e
-7 I
0.5769 miles
= 8.50 x 10 To summarize:
grelease)
RELEASE PROBABILITY year TOXIC MATERIAL CAR-MILE BASIS TON-MILE BASIS Anhydrous Ammonia 4.06'x 10~
4.86 x 10~
-6 Bromine 1.77 x 10 8.50 x 10~
These probabilities demonstrate that the expected rates of occurrences for the initiating events leading to potential consequences in excess of-10 CFR Part 100 exposure 6
guidelines are approximately 10 per year or less.
These frequencies are acceptable if, when combined with reasonable qualitative arguments, the realistic probabilities can be shown to be lower.
The use of this probability assessment is conversative and the realistic probability can be shown to be lower because of following conservatisms:
1.
No credit was taken in the release probabilities for the improved safety from recent tank car modifications.
The release probability data were from 1971-77, before the tank car modifications were complete.
Bromine is transported in tank car types 105A300W and 105A500W (49CFR173.252).
All specification 103A (including 105A300W and 105A500W) tank cars built after February 28, 1981 are required to be equipped with a coupler restraint system.
All specification 105 (including 105A300W and 105A500W) tank cars built before March 1, 1981 are required by 49CFR179.106 to be equipped with a coupler restraint system by February 28, 1982.
Anhydrous ammonia is transported in tank car types 105A300W, 106A500-X, 112S340-W, ll2S400F, 114A340-W and 114S340-W (49CFR173.314).
All specification 105A (including'105A300W) tank cars shall meet the design requirements described above.
In addition, each 105 (including 105A300W) tank car used to transport ammonia built after August 31, 1981 shall be class 105s.
This change would require the car to be additionally equipped with a tank head puncture resistance system.
All specification 112 and 114 tank cars are required to be equipped as follows:.
i
~~
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENT 114A (including 114A340-W) coupler restraint system ll3S and ll4S (including coupler restraint system 112S340-W, 112S400F, and and tank head puncture 114S340-W) resistance system Tank cars 114A, 112S and 114S built after December 31, 1977 shall be built with these requirements.
Tank cars ll4A, ll2S and ll4S built before January 1, 1978 shall be equipped with a coupler restraint system after December 31, 1978.
Tank cars 112S and ll4S built before January 1, 1978 shall be equipped with a tank head puncture resistance system by. December 31, 1979.
The impact of these safety modifications for reducing future tank car ruptures were not reflected in the release probabilities used in the risk assessment.
2.
No credit was taken for unstable winds.
Stability classes A, B and C were considered even through these Pasquill Categories result in highly unstable atmospheric conditions that would not be conducive to a slow diffusion of the toxic chemicals.
3.
No credit was taken for the effects of the lake.
One control room air intake faces Lake Clinton.
A significant impact of the lake will be the warm surface it presents to the atmosphere which, during nighttime and the winter, will be significantly warmer than the surrounding ground.
This increase in temperature will cause the layer of air in contact with the lake to achieve a neutral lapse rate, especially when stable conditions prevail over the land..-.
9 Thus, material released from a ground-level source would receive additional diffusion in the vertical over the lake than would be computed using a stable delta T stability category determined from the meteorological tower.
4.
No credit was taken for operator incapacitation events that would not result in exposures in excess of 10 CFR 100 guidelines.
This analysis assumed all such events resulted in an overexposure.
There is precedent for assuming that only one out of ten operator incapacitation events would result in an overexposure (see Reference 12, Control Room Habitability Study, Beaver Valley Station).
Since the probability analysis used a conservative approach with conservative data and since the calculated probability _of toxic 6
releases were approximately 10 per year or less, anhydrous ammonia and bromine releases need not be considered as design basis accidents.
III. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that all hazardous materials shipped via rail in the vicinity of the CPS were evaluated for their toxic potential on control room habitability.
Each hazardous material was systematically evaluated and eliminated based on shipping frequency, potential toxicity or probability risk assessment.
Based on this study, releases of hazardous materials shipped by rail in the vicinity of CPS need not be considered as design basis accidents.
i.,_
IV.
REFERENCES-1.
" Safety Evaluation Report related to the operation of Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1"; NUREG-0853; February 1982 (CPS-SER).
2.
Regulatory Guide 1.78, " Assumptions for Evaluating the Habitability of a Nuclear Power Plant Control Room During a Postulated Hazardous Chemical Release;" June 1974.
3.
Sax, N.
Irving, Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, Third Edition, Reinhold Book Corp., New York, N.
Y.,
1968.
4.
Broker, William and A.L. Mossman, Matheson Gas Data Book, Fifth Edition, September 1971.
i 5.
Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Volume 2A,_ Third Revised Edition, G. D. Clayton and F.
E. Clayton, Editors, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., 1981.
6.
Browning, Ethel, Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial, Solvents, Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, N.Y. (Also Amsterdam and London), 1965.
7.
Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances, U.S.
Department of H.E.W, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control prepared for National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1980.
8.
Walker, J. Frederick, " Formaldehyde", DuPont DeNemours Inc.,
Third Edition, Reinhold Book Corp., New York, N.Y., 1964.
9.
Telephone conversation with David Barrett, Celanese Chemical Company, February 3, 1983.
- 10. Standard Review Plan, " Evaluation of Potential Accidents",
section 2.2.3 NUREG-0800, Revision 2, July 1981.
- 11. Nayak, P. R. and D. W. Palmer, Issues and Dimensions of Freight Car size:
A Compendium, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration Report No. FRA/ORD-79/56, October, 1980.
- 12. " Control Room Habitability Study, Beaver Valley Power Station Units Nos. 1 and 2," prepared for Duquesne Light Company, by Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation, December 1, 1981.
- 13. Material Safety Data Sheets supplied by manufacturers for each chemical.
MISC 8 1....
List of Tables Table Title 1
Hazardous Material Shipments over the Illinois Centr;l Gulf-Gilman Line, 12/1/81 to 11/30/82.
2 Hazardous Materials Shipments with a Frequency of 30 or More Cars Per Year over the Illinois Central Gulf-Gilman Line, 12/1/81 to 11/30/82.
Explanation of Abbreviations, Words, and Symbols referred to in Tables 1 and 2.
3 HAZCHEM Calculations of Toxic Chemical Concentrh;-
tions at Clinton Station.
4 HAZCHEM Calculations of Toxic Chemical Concen-:.
trations at Clinton Station.
5 Accident Frequencies Per Million Car-Miles For Hazardous Materials Commodities 6
Accident Frequencies Per Billion Ton-Miles For Hazardous Materials Commodities 7
F_L(D) x Pw(D) Calculation 8
Joint Frequency Distribution J
- i
Page 1 of 8 TABLE 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SIIIPMENTS OVER THE:P.
ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF-GILMAN LINE,7 12/1/81 to 11/30/82 Total STCC No.
Description of Commodity Carloads Tons NONFLAMMABLE COMPRESSED GAS:
4904210 Anhydrous Ammonia 37 3,119 4904509 Carbon Dioxide, Liquefied 1
99 FLAMMABLE COMPRESSED GAS:
4905702 Butane (butane, impure for further 9
675 refining) 4905703 Butadiene, inhibited (butadiene, 1
75 impure for further refining)
~4905706 Butane 443 31,146 J',I4905707 Liquefied Petroleum Gas (butene gas 345 24,459[J.
liquefied)
["4905711 Liquefied Petroleum Gas (butylene, 13 875' impure for further refining) 4905741 Liquefied Petroleum Gas (NIC) 1 75-4905747 Isobutane 793 57,001
,j 4905748 Isobutylene 1
75; uit 4905750 Isobutane (Isobutane for further.
nic 8
523 refinery processing)
_,4905752 Liquefied Petroleum Gas 885 61,816 i
4905761 Methyl chloride 3
141' 1
cihr 4905781 Propane 164 11,559 1) 4905782 Propylene 801 57,132 4905785 Trifluorochloroethylene 1
75 4905792 Vinyl Chloride 4
300 11
Page 2 of 8 TABLE 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHIP:1ENTS OVER THE LLLINOIS CENTRAL GULF-GILMAN LINE, 12/1/81 to 11/30/82 Total STCC No.
Description of Commodity Carloads Tons FLAMMABLE LIQUID:
4906070 Pyrophoric Liquid 6
350 4906610 Ethylene Oxide 12 915 4906620 Propylene Oxide 77 5,164 4907215 Ethyl Acrylate, inhibitedt 5
443 4907230 Isoprene 6'
440
- c '; 4907270 Vinyl Acetate 137 10,769
~
4907420 Epichlorohydrin 77 1,219 4s4P4907846 Morpholine 4
316
,,.4908105 Acetone 3
170 l,
.s w.
460' 4908110 Benzene (benzol) 6 4908120 Butylamine 1
50 4908183 Hexane 6'
363 4909110 Alcohol, N.O.S.
(ethyl, alcohols.
60
'4,817-[-
anhydrous, denatured in part with petroleum products and/or chemicals not to exceed five percent) 4909117 ' -
Butyl Alcohol (n-butyl alcohol 2
157 (butyric alcohol or 1-butanol))
4909130 Butyl-Alcohol (tert-butyl alcohol) 1 94-4909131 Butyl Alcohol (isobutyl alchol) 1 67 4909141 Denatured Alcohol 56 3,874 4909149 Diacetone Alcohol 1
85 4909160 Ethyl Acetate 2
143 4909183 Flammable Liquid, N.O.S.
(acrylamide 1
65 solution)
Page 3 of 8 TABLE 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL' SHIPMENTS OVER THE LLLINOIS CENTRAL GULF-GILMAN LINE, 12/1/81 to 11/30/82 Total
.STCC No.
Description of Commodity Carloads Tons 4909190 Heptane 3
181 4909193 Hexane (NIC) 1 65 4909205 Isopropanol 17 1,123 4909207 Isobutyl Acetate 1
97 4909230 Methanol (methyl dlcohol,1 wood alcohol, 2
140 columbian spirits) 4909243 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1
77 4909245.
Flammable Liquid, N.O.S.
(Methyl 1
70 Isobutyl Ketone) 4909305 Toluene 8
458-4909330 Methy1 cyclohexane
.1 80 t
4909350 Xylene 26.
1,754 4910157-Compound, Tree (or) Weed Killing 1
50 Liquid 4910185 Flammable Liquid, N.O.S.
6 438 4910245 Oil, N.O.S. Petroleum 2
~
101 4910258 Petroleum Distillate l'
50
~
4910259 ~~'
Petroleum Naphtha 20 1,439 4910280 Resin Solution 2
80 4910285 Road Asphalt or Tar, Liquid 1
88 4910442 Flammable Liquid, N.O.S.
(rosin 1
41 liquor) 4910444 Flammable Liquid, N.O.S.
(rosin solution) 1 100 i
Page 4 of 8 TABLE 1~
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHIPMENTS OVER THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF-GILMAN LINE, 12/1/81 to 11/30/82 Total STCC No.
Description of Commodity Carloads Tons COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID:
4912215 Combustible Liquid, N.O.S.
(butyl 3
284 acrylate) 4913103 Alcohol, N.O.S.
7 393 4913116
~EthleneGlycolMonoethylyther 1
45 4913121 Alcohol, N.O.S.-(decyl alcohol, other 1~
50 than perfumery grade) 4913126 Alcohol, N.O.S.
(hexyl alcohol, other 1
50 than perfumery grade)
.4913143 Alcohol, N.O.S.
(methyl isobutyl 2
152 carbinol) 4913144 Formaldehyde (or) formalin solution 38 3,227c
-(in containers over 100 gallons) 4913162 Ethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether 2'
158< "
4913179 Combustible Liquid, N.O.S.
4 285 (cyclohexanna.e) 4913183 Combustible Liquid', N.O.S.
1 50 (methylethanolamine) 4913194 Combustible Liquid, N.O.S.
9 706 (glycol ethers) 4915112 Fuel Oil No. 1, 2, 4, 5 20 1,316 (or) 6 4915185 Combustible Liquid, N.O.S.
3 130 4915229 Combustible Liquid, N.O.S.
1 45 (lubricating oil, nec) 4915239 Naphtha 1
67 4915240 Naphtha Distillate 6
410 i
Page 5 of 8 l
TABLE 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHIPHENTS OVER THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF-GILMAN LINE, 2
12/1/81 to 11/30/82 Total STCC No.
Description of Commodity Carloads Tons 4915242
-Combustible Liquid, N.O.S.
6 318
'(petroleum lubricating oil) 4915245 Oil, N.O.S. Petroleum Oil 14-703 4915253 Varnish (asphaltum or coal tar 1
75 varnish)
-4915257 Petroleum Distil15te'(petroleum 2.
90 distillate fuel' oil, not for illuminating purposes) 4915258 Petroleum Distillate 1
67 ~
4915259 Petroleum Naphtha 47 3,468
' '[4915263 Tar, Liquid (tar or pitch, coal:.
8 600*'
or petroleum) 4915302 Combustible Liquid, N.O.'S.
(asphalt 2
177 pavement surface sealer, asphalt,
~
coal tar or petroleum base) 4915401 Alcohol, N.O.S.
(alcohol distillates, 1
65 synthetic) 4915490~
Combustible Liquid', N.O.S. (aromatic 9,
655 concentrates, suitable only for t
further processing) i 4915535 __
Combustible Liquid, N.O.S.
6 440 i
(additives, fuel oil, gasoline or lubricating oil, containing less than 50% by weight of petroleum)
FLAMMABLE SOLIDS:
4916141 Phosphorus, white or yellow in water 2
100 OXIDIZING MATERIALS:
4918335 Hydrogen Peroxide Solution (over 52%
20 1,103 peroxide) 4918746 Sodium Nitrate 34 1,980 l
i i
~
Page 6 of 8 TABLE 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHIPMENTS OVER THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF-GILMAN LINE, 12/1/81 to 11/30/82 Total STCC No.
Description of Commodity Carloads Tons POISONS B:
'4921220 Carbolic Acid (or) phenol 3
225 4921445 Motor Fuel Antiknock Compound (ot) 9 459 antiknock compound I
7
-388 4021466 Orthonitroaniline 4921575 Toluene Diisocyanate 8
594 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS:
4926252 Radioactive Material (Maleic 1
92 d!E.er,.;
Anhydride Molten Acid Corrosive)(NIC)
CORROSIVE MATERIALS:
4930024 Hydrofluoric Acid,' Anhydrous 20 1,703 (or) Hydrogen Fluoride 493 040-Sulfuric Acid 156 13,831 4930042 Sulfuric Acid, Spent 4
261-4930204 Chlorosulfonic Acid 8.
424 7
4930228 Hydrochloric Acid 6
579 (muriatic (hydrochloric) acid) 4930247 Phosphoric Acid 18 1,554 (phosphoric fertilizer-solutior,
containing not more than 77% of phosphoric anhydride by weight) 4930248 Phosphoric Acid 16 1,299 4931303 Acetic Acid, glacial 5
423 4931405 Acrylic Acid 7
529 4932380 Sulfur Chloride (mono and di) 3 254
j ',
Page.7 of 3 TABLE 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHIPMENTS OVER THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF-GILMAN LINE,-
12/1/81 to 11/30/82 Total STCC No.
Description of Commodity Carloads
-Tons 4935220 Alkaline. liquid, N.O.S.
1-89 4935223' Alkaline liquid, N.O.S.
(fatty 1
17 5 1
alcohols, aliphatic or cyclic, cyanoethylated and hydrogenated
- and derivatives thereof, such as
. salts, diamines, oxyalkylates and quarternary ammonium compou'ds) n 4935230 -
Potassium Hydroxide, liquid (or) lF~
371'
+n ti solution
'n.14935235 Sodium Hydroxide, dry solid, flake 1
37
~ " '
bead, (or) granular (sodium caustic)
% eld935250 Sodium Hydroxide',' liquid, (or) 4 349 669l solution l'
E.4.935243 Sodium Hydroxide, liquid, (or)
-4 303 solution (caustic sodium (sodium hydroxide) containing not less than 487. water by weight in solution)
R$935245 Sodium Hydroxide,- liquid (or) solution-3 15 5 "..
(caustic soda and caustic potash, mixed in colution)
~
- 4935268-Sodium Hydrosulfide, solution 3
150 i
4935665 Monoethanolamine 44 3,391 j.
4936110 Bromine 34 1,340 4936515 Compound, cleaning liquid 1
75
[
4936516 Compound, cleaning liquid (cleaning 1
30 compounds, iron or steel, nec, liquid) 4936520 Compound, cleaning, liquid (containing 1
75 phosphoric or acetic acid) 4936539 Corrosive Liquid, N.O.S.
(petroleum 2
125 refinery sulfide waste) u
_~.-~~--,-..ee--.~
Page 8 of 8 TABLE 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHIPMENTS OVER THE LLLINOIS CENTRAL GULF-GILMAN LINE, 12/1/81 to 11/30/82 Total STCC No.
Description of Commodity Carloads Tons 4936540 Corrosive Liquid, N.O.S.
34 2,621 4936565 Alkaline Battery Fluid packed with 2
82 battery charger, radio current. supply device (or) electronic equipment and actuating device.
.0THER REGULATED MATERIAL-GROUP A:
i 4940320 Carbon-Tetrachloride 185 15,560 4940335 Ethylene Dibromide (or) 1, 2 -
1 50 dibromoethane
.. 4940341 Formaldel:y de (or) formalin solution 1
95 aQip v.;j '
(in containers of 110 gallons or less)
GROUP B:
4950110 Acids, Chemicals, and Other Articles, 1
20 Mixed Loads GROUP E:
4962356 Naphthenic Acid 2
92 4966110 Adipic Acid 2...
156 l
l I
i l
t l
i k
i t..
^
TABLE 2 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHIPMENTS WITH A FREQUENCY OF 30 OR-MORE CARS PER YEAR OVER THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF-GILMAN LINE, 12/1/81 TO 11/30/82 STCC No.
Description of Commodity Carloads Tons 4904210 Anhydrous Ammonia 37 3,119 4905706 Butane 443 31,146 4905707 Liquefied Petroleum Gas (butene 345 24,459 gas, liquefied) 4905747 Isobutane I
793 57,001 4905752 Liquefied Petroleum Gas 885 61,816 4905781 Propane 164 11,559 4905782 Propylene 801 57,132 4906620 Propylene Oxide 77 5,164 4907270 Vinyl Acetate 137 10.769 4
4909110 Alcohol, N.O.S.
(ethyl alcohol, 60 4,817 anhydrous, denatured in part with petroleum products and/or chemicals not to exceed five percent) 4909141 Denatured Alcohol 56 3,874 4913144 Formaldehyde (or) formalin solution 38 3,227 (in containers over 100 gallons) 4915259 Petroleum Naphtha 47 3,468 4918746 Sodium Nitrate 34 1,980 4930040 Sulfuric Acid 156 13,831 4935665 Monoethanolamine 44 3,391 4936110 Bromine 34 1,340 4936540 Corrosive Liquid, N.O.S.
34 2,621 4940320 Carbon Tetrachloride 185 15,560
- r Explanation of Abbreviations, Words, and Symbols referred to in Tables l ' and 2 Words,.
Symb ols, and Abbreviations Explanation BA Blasting Agent t
CFR Code of Federal Regulations CL Combustible Liquid CH Corrosive Material DOT U.S. Department of Transportation l
EA Etiologic' Agent i
ETC et cetera FG Flammable Gas FL Flammable Liquid FS Flammable Solid HAZMAT Hazardous Materials ID Identification IR Irritating Material LSA Low Specific' Activity NEC Not Elsewhere Classified NG Non-Flammable Gas NOS Not Otherwise Specified OA Other Regulated Materials-Group A i
OB Other Regulated Materials-Group B OE Other Regulated Materials-Group E OM 0xidizing Material (Or) Oxidizer OP Organic Peroxide PA Poison A PB Poison B PC Product Class RM Radioactive Material RQ Reportable Quantity STCC Standard Transportation Commodity Code TOFC Trailer-On-Flat-Car U.S.
United States l
XA Class A Explosive XB Class B Explosive XC Class C Explosice Percent NIC Not In Code - commodity was coded with a STCC number which could not be identified 1-
- from the STCC tariff.
Commodity was assumed to be of the same finily of nearest identified commodity by STCC number.
m*
.e
-,,,.-,,y--.-
r
+ - -
y e----
- yr
- w v
-~
Table 3 HAZCHEM CALCULATIONS OF T0XIC CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS AT CLINTON STATION CONCENTRATION AT MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AMOUNT OF
- CONTROL ROOM CONCENTRATION CHEMICAL INTAKE CALCULATED FOR ACUTu CHEMICAL EVALUATED BY HAZCHEM 9SURES REFERENCE / COMMENTS Propylene 121 tons 0.843 x 10-4 lb/ft 0.22.
10-3 lb/fc Reference 5 3
3 0xide (562 ppm) s1500 ppm)
Vinyl Acetate 101 tons 0.171 x 10-4 lb/ft No acute exposure Reference 6 (reports 3
(77 ppm) limits were found it to be a "relatively non-toxic material. ")
Carbon 130 tons 0.442 x 10-4 lb/ft 0.609 x 10-3 lb/ft Reference 3 3
3 Tetrachloride (109 ppm)
(1500 ppm)
~
3 3
Pentane 97 tons 0.1707 x 10-3 lb/ft 0.221 x 10-3 lb/ft.
Reference 7 (Petroleum (927 ppm)
= 2 x TLV** ppm) -
(1200 Naphtha)
Hexane 97 tons 0.5097 x 10-4 lb/ft 1.10 x 10-4 lb/ft Reference 7 3
3 (Petroleum (232 ppm)
(500 ppm)
Naphtha)
= TWA**
Heptane 97 tons 0.2371 x 10-4 lb/ft 2.00 x 10-4 lb/ft Reference 7 3
3 (Petroleum (95 ppm)
= 2 x TLV** ppm)
(800 Naphtha)
-7 3
3 37% Formalde-98 tons 0.4496 x 10 lb/ft 7.49 x 10-7 lb/ft References 2, hyde (0.6 ppm)
(10 ppm)
(Formalin) 50% Formalde-98 tons 0.5941 x 10-7 lb/ft 7.49 x 10-7 lb/ft References 2, 3
3 hyde (0.8 ppm)
(10 ppm)
Ethyl Alcohol 100 tons 0.497 x 10-5 lb/ft 0.587 x 10-3 lb/ft References 2, 3
3 (42 ppm)
(5000 pp')
m
- Maximum Shipping Weight from survey.
- If an acute exposure limit could not be found, a value of 2 x TLV (Threshold Limit Valve for an 8-hour, daily exposure) or the TWA (Time Weighted Average for lengthy exposure) was used.
These valves are very conservative.
TABLE 4 HAZCHEM CALCULATIONS OF T0XIC CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS AT CLINTON STATION CONCENTRATION AT MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AMOUNT OF CONTROL ROOM CONCENTRATION CHEMICAL INTAKE CALCULATED FOR ACUTE CHEMICAL' -
EVALUATED' BY HAZCHEM EXPOSURES Methyl. Alcohol (as 100 tons 0.2234 x 10-4 lb /f t 3 2 x TLV*4"lb/ft 0.3015 x 10-3 a worst case (296 ppm) for denatured (400 ppm) cleohol) l DENATURED ALCOHOL:
Concentrations a't the control room intake for the following denaturants were estimated by scaliny down 'the concentration for a 100-ton methyl-alcohol spill to the maximum amount of each denaturant found in 100 tons of denatured ethyl alcohol.
MAXIMUM %
CONCENTRATION AT MAXIMUM BY WEIGHT IN CONTROL ROOM ALLOWABLE ETHYL ALCOHOL INTAKE FOR AN CONCENTRATION FOUND IN EQUIVALENT AMOUNT FOR ACUTE DENATURANT LITERATURE Or' METHANOL EXPOSURES
'Banzene 5.27%
13 ppm 2 x TLV* = 50 ppm Butyl Alcohol 2.79%
7 ppm 2 x TLV* = 200 ppm Chloroform 8.5%
12 ppm 2000 ppm Ethyl Ether 8.15%
25 ppm 800 ppm Formaldehyde 4.37%
8 ppm 10 ppm Heptane 5%
16 ppm 2 x TLV* = 1000 ppm Methyl Isobutyl 5%
14 ppm 2 x TLV* = 200 ppm Ketone Toluene 5.07%
13 ppm 2 x TLV* = 400 ppm
- If an actue exposure limit could not be found, a value of 2 x TLV (Threshold Limit Value for an 8-hour, daily exposure) was used. This value is very conservative.
NOTE:
All denaturant maximum allowable concentrations were taken from Reference 3, except for formaldehyde, which was taken from Reference 2.
6
TABLE 5 ACCIDENT FREQUENCIES PER MILLION CAR-MILES FOR HAZARDOUS. MATERIALS COMMODITIES DAlfAGE THRESHOLD
$0
> $100
> $5000 Explosives 1.30 0.53 0.210 Non'-Flammable Gas 1.00 g
0.15 0.019*
Flammable Gas 0.94 0.20 0.'094 Flammable Liquid 1.20 0.32 0.110 Flammable Solid 0.69 0.17 0.058 Oxidizer 1.60 0.66 0.069 Organ!? Peroxide 1.40 1.40 Toxic 1.10 0.43 0.079
~
Radioactive 3.00 1.30 0.420 Corrosive 2.50 0.45 0.090**
f All Hazardous Material 1.40, 0.33 0.086 ammonia is classified as a non-flammable gas
- bromine is classified as a corrosive SOURCE: Ifaterials Transportation Board Data 1971-77; Arthur'D. Little, Inc., Estimates Excerpted from USDOT FRA/ORD-79/56 (Reference ll) i
TABLE 6 ACCIDENT FREQUENCIES PER BILLION TON-MILES FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COMMODITIES Damage Threshold L$0 1
> $100
>$5000 Explosives 26.0 13.0 4.30 Non-Flammable Gas 15.0 2.2 0.27*
Flammable Gas 13.0 2.7 1.30 Flammable Liquid 17.0 4.7 1.60 Flammable Solid 11.0 2.9 0.95 Oxidizer 21.0 8.8 0.91 Organic Peroxide 17.0 18.0 Toxic 18.0 7.3 1.30 Radioactive 66.0 28.0 9.40 Corrosive 31.0 5.6 1.10 *
- All Hazardous Material 20.0 4.7 1.20
(
- ' ammonia is classified as a non-flammable gas C* bromine is classified as a corrosive SOURCE: Materials Transportation Board Data 1971-77; Arthur D. Little Inc., Estimates Excerpted from USDOT FRA/ORD-79/56 (Reference 11) t m
I TABLE 7 c
- 2) L(D) x Pw(D) CALCULATION Wind Track Segment Length Direction
- Wind Probability
- L(D) x Pw(D)
Segment L(D) (miles)+
D
- Pw (D) (dimensionless)
(miles) 1 3.30 W
0.0770 0.2541 2
0.90 WNW O.0792 0.0713 3
0.46 NW 0.0584 0.0268 4
0.34 NNW 0.0438 0.0149 5
0.35 N
0.0425 0.0149 6
0.45 NNW 0.0405 0.0182 7
0.80 NE 0.0528 0.0422 8
3.10 ENE 0.0434 0.1345~
Total 7776 0.5769 IO L(D) x Pw(D) = 0.5769 miles
+ Denotes length of track in wind direction section under consideration (see figure 2)
- Pw(D) = Probability that a wind of any stability class and any velocity class is blowing to-rard the control room air intake (from Table 8).
l l
._a
,9,
i}-
s
(
l,
j
- y
... y 4-g:
. TABLE 8.
JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION:
CL INI GI POWER STAf!ON 33 FT WINO D ISTR IB ullom 0F W IN O D IR ECT IGN 5 AND SP E ED S 4714/72 - 4/30/77 198-33 FT DEEiA T AL L SI 88 IE !!IES C0Mg INED DIRECl!0N
/
+
$ PEED 4MP58 NhE NE LNE E
55d SW W5J W-WW W NW. NNW 4. TOT AL 03-1.4 152 21 2 215 209 364 195 248 290 233 235 IST 395 1s5 137 137 146 3140 ell 0.37 0.52 0.53 0.51 0 40 0.44 0.64 C. 71 0.57 U.5 s 0.to O.48 D.45 0.34' O.34 0 36 7.72 (23 0.37 0 52 0.53 U.5 8 U.40 0.44 0.61 C.71 0 57 0.54 0.46. 0.44 0.45 0 34 0.34 0.36 7.72 1.5-3.0 433 69 n 671 69 2 629 439 1 033 I J78 1054 912 654 635 7 03 594.
433
.434 38477 als 3.06 3.70 1.65 1.70 3.55. 2.06 2.54 2.tJ 2.59 2.24 1.61 1.56 1.73 I.46 1.06 1.C7 28.21 g
125 1 06 1.70 1.65 1.70 1.55 2.06 2.54 2.E3 2.59 2.24 1.61 1.56 3.73 1.46 1 06 1 07 2 8.23 mg U2 3.5-50 538 599 568 575 554 61 8 911 1240 1 389 1996 803 820
- 9t9 fee. 572 562 12472 8
81 1.32 3.47 1 40 1.48 1.36 1.52 2.24 3.05 3 24 2.69 1.97 2 02 2.23 1.94 1.41 1.38 30.66 h2 (25 1.32
- 1. q I.40 3.41 1.36 1.52 2.24 3.05 3.24 2.69 1.97 2.02,2.23 1 94 1 41 1.38 30.66 g
5.3-3.0 377 472 229 243 334 43 s 503 736' 1080 834 673 937 I nil 66e 470 920 9635 N
til 0.93 1.16 0.56 0.60 0.77 1 03 3 24 2.42 2.66 2.05 1.65 2.30 2.49 I.64 1.16 3 01 23.69 4 23 0 93 1 16 0.55 0.60 0.77 1.03 1 24 2.42 2 66 2.05 1.65 2.30 2.49 I.64 1.16 1.C 3 23.69 8.I-30.4 96 79 39 20 37 51 64 233 227 183 228 339 240 134 331 IC6 2227 519 0 24 0 39 0.05 0.05 0.D9' O.13 0.36- 0.57 0.56 0.45 0 56 0.e3 0 69 0 33 0.32
- 0.26 5.47 829 0.24 0.19 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.13 0 36 057 056 0.45 0.56 0.83 0.69 0.33 0.32 0.26 5.47 OV ER 50.4 51 95 65 96 38 70 88 124 350 121 177 207 135 56 40 61 1637 tst 0.I 3 0.23 0.16 0.24 0.20 0.17 0.22 E.30 0.37 0.30 0.44 0.51 0.33 0.14 0.I 0 0.15 3.98
'M 0 33 0 23 0 16 0 24 0 20 0.37 n.22 0.30 0.37.0.30 0.44 0.51 0 33 0.34 0 30 0 15 3.9e AL L SP E E D S 1647 2347 IF67 1835 1779 2191 2047 3944 4063 338I 2722 3133 3 223 2377 1783 1729 40568 ell 4.05 5.28 4.34 4.58 4.37 5.39 7.00 9.70 9.99 8.31
'6.69 7.70 7.92 5.84 4.38 4 25 99.73 528 4 05 5.28 4.34 4.51 4.37 53 7 9.70 9.99 s.3_I_ 6.69 7.70 7.92 5.e4 4.38 4 25 99.73' Ill: PERCENT OF ALL 6000 08 5 F OR THIS PnGE 8 29: PERCENT OF ALL GOOD US S F OR INE PERIOD 40677 GOOD HR5 109 HR$ t 0.3 PCII L ESS TH A80 0.3 PP 5 44204 HR$,1N T H E T IMC P ER 100 92.0 PCI D AT 4 REC 0 VERT
.I e
9 e'
a
-_=
List of Figures Figure Title 1
1 Transportation Routes and Pipelines within a 5-mile Radius of the Clinton Power Station.
g 2
Illinois Central Gulf-Gilman Line Divided Over Eight Wind Directions in Relation to the Clinton Power Station 4
t
n
. 4.L M. w.:,g & q ? M & Q $9.sil
% Y W % W 9. % d @ 4 nx nk
~
W.yt$
M M t E q %, u$ U C mik ;is.4h fi a A x..s ge gf.:ik*h. am.:f.c....s +- u..;.3 W
. r.
n,g s
-m v.c
. +. -.:c 1.
.r m.g+.
- 1...
- 2. -
m.
. m.w... n. ~e..
m w.. u.
~. 2...
w.
m
.n.
n
=
.a
+
x.
~ m.;? n.
7
- }?,:. -
-ll ~ -
pf _ _
i
-1 w-
}<q:. wi.y {._.: g : y pgzG,.
Q.!ji
~ e; m
-. n :- +4-
.,u, if m.. x.
m. -.,s. ~m.:3.w.y ;gy m.,.'..
.w - :
c
. r-.t.
.n. e.. -
+.
..3,..
t
" "f.(.
\\.
j
'f.
t
- g'.f.3*
ie%
g s' g
-l; u': s >
s
\\
=
a s
i s-1 m
r x
l
.x i
i
,_ _ _ _ _,i
____~______.c.
.,, s x.1 x.!
L,.
l
/
n i
4..
1 IN I
i s.
/
I l
N
/
I I
1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ a _ _ _ _ _y!
3'
/t
-s n
1 i
i
-s l
x.
! sf 4
m y~,p,,,
e y
C 1
r' /
b i
i
.I
/
LEGEND:
g.
(
,/g
,'f f
~
ASHLAND OIL P!PELINE -8"
[
-/
I r
.:f
\\, CLINTON STATION CAPPED AL *J AD ANDONED I
gg :
f
.g h
L LLINOIS POWE R G A S LINE -2"
' :j},
k SHELL OIL PIPELINE -14"
{
j, o**
/
i e
p s
-- - PHILLIPS GA S PIPELINE
-8"
{*(
.t
/
t s,
g E XPLORER PIPE LINE -24"
.a**'
+
g j
l
\\
ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF RAILROADS.
i
\\.
h
\\.
g/.
's HE AVY OUTY ROADS k
8 5
\\.
MEDIUM DUTY ROADS
.___=
\\ I~"
l
'\\,
().
f!]
i v
e '
j
\\
l
\\
ll, 4
9 N/
s fl
\\
E i
n
)........
- Y -
^
3
,i s
p s.
i e
y
- l *'* -
g CLINTON POWER STATION i.__
=l FIN AL S AFETY AN ALYSis REPORT
- 4.
n
_______.,n_____.u.________.
l p
1 I
.,tr..
i
\\
TRANSPORTATION ROUTES AND PIPEL!hES
- i' E,
g l *g WITHIN A 5-MILE RADIUS OF THE
.D I /
j f
l CLINTON POWER STAT!CM l
2
_.L' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /
-_________a_.L_______
c.
g
_ _ __1
^
1
- .c.
'.:~..
.m...
!* k. :' l
. ')
-h j
{
.i.
f j;;:.1
, '}. gl[, #[,): ;-g,. ;g].p.
4
.i
' *l k'
~, y t ,
,gg' p
j 4
,lg 4.
e-A
+?,,
g~+ *,.,7-iy ;n,g g* p&.gly.,,,; ; - 9.
. 5...,2 f.i. t.,.,.
l.*
Olhk, j.k).~ L'~^f{hy-$pp,.-' p.'.
p my..gy.e i
$$nm.
-,r--,--
4 E.
- '. L -
.d k
.t
. gh
+f
.sn-pN'
+.-
l'
,.s.2 h5U'f.TI..3j.Ef* i '
N-73'k.'1
-}
... g.3.
,.7.o
' ~
g g
'8 4 -
\\
l
.o
\\
l
'\\
y O*
C-
,_-_")__ig. :
. l.ji{.. '_" Q __<g._ _ _ _ ' _ _ j [.4
\\.(
j 1
\\l.\\_____l___(__
5
- \\..
g
- s 6. w n...
/
M.,: (;- /..,. l *%. '. -
-~-$... -
t 4
. Ia I
l l\\
j
...., j/
e&
1. (~.,
~ '
\\
l.
j ty
[.-
i.w w-n d.W f
' p.f[
[
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _! _ _h j
c-A, ic l
'r
/
a*
LEGEND:
w
- ,,,, l
..-._.- A SHL A ND OIL PIPELIN E -8 "
TATI,O M
- g
/
t CAPPEO AND ABANDONED l
- "me.
0+
p
=h LLINOIS PCWER GAS LINE -2" SHELL OIL PIPELINE *14"
~.
PHILLIPS G AS PIPELINE -8"
- ""'**p*
g
/
j g
/
(*)0 EXPLORER PIPELINE -24"
~~*~~~
g l
\\
ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF RAILROADS
{
/
\\
g,.
\\,
01E AVY DUTY ROADS 8
\\.
p*
- j.,'
,e t.
MEDIUM OUTY ROADS
._-==--
.l
's
- I
'N f
4
.' / !
'N Y
[.
/
N g
/
\\,
\\'f.......
s est o
a 2
m
/l i
L
/
fp
/
\\
l
}E'*1.
~
g
,..-l }i i
i CL.lNTON POWER STATION
[
-- ]
p L _ _ _ _ _ _ y._ _ _ _ _ b.l.
l FIN AL S AFETY ANALYSIS REPORT l
a.
ly-j i
- 4 f
1 t;-
/
\\
TRANSPORTATION ROUTES AND PIPELINES
.S
' h '.)
l 'g j*'.
i
.,.h WITHIN A 5-MILE RADIUS OF ThE
,i I /
i.,... ?),r j l
r CLINTON PCWER STATION
~-
)
-. ]. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~_ _ /
- -- -)- L- - - - - - - -
IL.
- z
\\
m h
j I
--