ML20067D043

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Info Re Whether or Not ACRS Ever Recommended Rejection of Proposed Site
ML20067D043
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 05/09/1970
From: Parker J
SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE
To: Hanauer S
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
Shared Package
ML20067C396 List:
References
FOIA-90-173 NUDOCS 9102120303
Download: ML20067D043 (3)


Text

__

t*(*

(*

(,

    • r b's 4

SEU2h37 $Y[I-P0lJATDIIBA01E yc i

~

^

Route 84 Ithepton Falls, N H V

103B44

,InyL9,1970 p

Dr S Hanauer Advisory Conmittoo on Renotor Safety Box 62 Oak Rid o, Tennessee C

o a;

Dear Dr Hanauer:

RcCarding the work of'yogr Committeo in judging the enfety of opecitio nucicar plant citec, picace advise me as to i

(

whether or not the Committeo has cycr recommended a ro-

[

joetion of a propoced cite.

If co, has the

~~L overruled the Comnittee?

I have bocn told by a utility excoutive that ACRS has never rejceted outricht any 'civen cite.

I'd be crateful t

to have thin confirmed or otherwise by you, an an nindepend.

L ent scientist involved in these matters, t

Any documents you can cupply will be espoointly Eolpful.

For exwnple, your statement in the Brown's Ferry eito in which, if Novick (pp 84-85) in correct, you took creeption to the Committoc 's recommendationo....

Thanks in adynnco for your accietande.

Since oly,

/

(U cwi%

John y Parker Publib Informttion chairmen NI'01110filig O hMIify bitirollillcllt...

jO 9102120303 901219 PDR FOIA

\\

l DEKOK90-173 PDR

a

-r'.;

(

(

.l.L,li

},!

l floute 84 lit.mpton Fn11c, ir }{

03844 14ny 9,19'l0 Dr D:.vid Ohrent Arc or.r.c 1:c.tional Laboratory Chicago, 1111 noir.

pr r Er 01: rent:

1:e; vinc; the recommendatione told fitjtsi judCnonte on opecific cite for nucicar pouer pit.nte: by the Advitory Cormittee on ite.r.ct or Sarcty ( A01 S),

I vorider if you etn tell me whether of-not the ACRS hac ever rejected a civer. cisc.

If co, han the Atomic Enerfy Commit;t; ion overruled any cuch recom:acndation?

I'd r.uch apprecinic c.ny ttdvice you can offer in this mt.tter.

Th r?:a t.nd bect uishec.

?

t. </w.

<J ~

v Johh H Pt.rker Itblic Informatio: chnirne.n RECE1VED D.ORRENT M AY lb B70 i

l Drosnoiing fl Quality Cnvironsnent...

if

,)

. y'

't

. ;.,. s..,

L*

w SEACOAST AliTI-POLLUTIOP: LEAGJE "Promotin6 n Qanlity Envirenwnt" Otatom;nt of Tnlicy April 19, 1969 Bovis d on llay 16, :969 9

Wo cro o-The public hetsith, st.fety, and velfaro are nur prin try cenecrns.

c,ually conecrncd vith the intelligent ute of the natural envircmont--land, sir, water--for ourcolves and for futurc concrations.

; hiieve that the evmial use cf atonic energy for the conent$nn of

<.< 1.etr5cn1 pouer cu. be a thrcat t o the abovo concerns.

The Stato of New r*..p,1.$ro nuet prchet the health and snfoty of its citicons tsfero permit-1:.c thre building of nuclcar power ple.nts.

  • 'c bclieve that the Trnposed nuelcar plant tinnc the New H:..pshiro sencoast
  • will mir the beauty of an attractivo, popular resort area, will do irrever-nibio danace to a valunble estuary, and will jeepardito the considerablo

(:enomic and recreatienni bonefits procently accruuc fren our seneoast.

W urge that a neratcriun be declared on furthtr censtruction of nuelcar

enrd pinnts until reacter technolecy and proper Severr. cr.tr.1 reculatione,

':Mudinc adcqutic tif::catrds, arc sufficiently developei.

'! '. SEr. COAST ANTI-T^11DTION LEAC')E is therefere organized to work toward

  • ' ' 21ning two spccific cortisi a deferral of the proposcd nuelcar plant in

.... dr:ch and a viatrcus eppecition to any alteration or dccradation of New

? phiro'c tidal r.:.rthes and estuaries.

Fer infernation, including nonbership, pleaso contact:

W)te-r 'J. Tincio, Precident Capt. Neil G. MacPhcroon, V. President 30 'Joedridco Inne Throo Lanson Lano

.erth Hampton, !!.H 03862 Hampton, li.H.

03S42 4

Tolophone 964-8806 Telephono 926-5817

., -, - -