Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20058M4021993-12-0808 December 1993 Forwards TIA,93TIA006,interpretation of Reporting Requirements Re Multiple Failures of safety-related Components Project stage: Other ML20058L6931993-12-0808 December 1993 Forwards TIA 93TIA006,interpretation of Reporting Requirements Re Multiple Failures of safety-related Components Project stage: Other ML20058L0091993-12-0808 December 1993 Forwards NRR 931102 Response to Region IV 930413 Request for Interpretation of Reporting Requirements Re Multiple Failures of safety-related Components Identified During Performance of Surveillance Testing Project stage: Other ML20058K9811993-12-0808 December 1993 Forwards NRR 931102 Response to Region IV Request for Interpretation of Reporting Requirements Re Multiple Failures of safety-related Components Identified During Performance of Surveillance Testing for Info Project stage: Other ML20058K6001993-12-0808 December 1993 Forwards Tia,Interpretation of Reporting Requirements, 93TIA006 Re Multiple Failures of safety-related Components Project stage: Other ML20058K5961993-12-0808 December 1993 Forwards Tia,Interpretation of Reporting Requirements - 93TIA006,re Multiple Failures of safety-related Components Project stage: Other ML20058K5801993-12-0808 December 1993 Forwards Tia,Interpretation of Reporting Requirements - 93TIA006,re Multiple Failures of safety-related Components Project stage: Other ML20058K5611993-12-0808 December 1993 Forwards Tia:Interpretation of Reporting Requirements, 93TIA006.Guidance Provided in Response to Region 5 Request for Interpretation of Reporting Requirements for safety- Related Components Project stage: Other 1993-12-08
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARLIC-99-0098, Forwards Revs to Fort Calhoun Station EPIPs & Emergency Planning Forms Manual.Document Update Instructions & Summary of Changes Are Included on Confirmation of Transmittal Form Attached1999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Revs to Fort Calhoun Station EPIPs & Emergency Planning Forms Manual.Document Update Instructions & Summary of Changes Are Included on Confirmation of Transmittal Form Attached ML20217G9261999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-10 on 990913-17.One NCV Noted ML20217G2331999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-09 on 990913-17.No Violations Noted LIC-99-0091, Submits Suppl Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal, in Response to NRC RAI During 990817 Meeting with Util1999-10-0808 October 1999 Submits Suppl Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal, in Response to NRC RAI During 990817 Meeting with Util LIC-99-0097, Forwards Final RO & SRO License Applications,As Requested in ,Certifying That Training Completed for Six RO Candidates,Three Instant SRO Candidates & One Upgrade SRO Candidate.Without Encls1999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Final RO & SRO License Applications,As Requested in ,Certifying That Training Completed for Six RO Candidates,Three Instant SRO Candidates & One Upgrade SRO Candidate.Without Encls ML20217B5111999-10-0606 October 1999 Forwards Amend 193 to License DPR-40 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises TS Sections 2.10.4,3.1 & Table 3-3 to Increase Min Required RCS Flow Rate & Change Surveillance require- Ments for RCS Flow Rate ML20216H7231999-09-29029 September 1999 Informs That Util 980325 Response to GL 97-06, Degradation of SG Internals, Provides Reasonable Assurance That Condition of Util SG Internals in Compliance with Current Licensing Bases for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20212L9571999-09-27027 September 1999 Informs That Follow Up Insp for Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator Will Be Conducted During Wk of 991001 LIC-99-0089, Forwards Preliminary License Exam Applications for Six Ros, Three Instant SROs & One Upgrade SRO Candidate,Per Preparation for Ro/Sro Licensing Exams to Be Administered on 991025-29 at Fcs.Without Encl1999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Preliminary License Exam Applications for Six Ros, Three Instant SROs & One Upgrade SRO Candidate,Per Preparation for Ro/Sro Licensing Exams to Be Administered on 991025-29 at Fcs.Without Encl LIC-99-0092, Forwards Revised Epips,Including non-proprietary Rev 8 to EPIP-RR-66,rev 3 to EPIP-EOF-24,rev 14 to RERP-Section F,Rev 11 to RERP-Section I,Rev 12 to RERP-Appendix C & RERP & EPIP Indexes.Proprietary Rev 3 to EPIP-EOF-24,pages 1-3,encl1999-09-21021 September 1999 Forwards Revised Epips,Including non-proprietary Rev 8 to EPIP-RR-66,rev 3 to EPIP-EOF-24,rev 14 to RERP-Section F,Rev 11 to RERP-Section I,Rev 12 to RERP-Appendix C & RERP & EPIP Indexes.Proprietary Rev 3 to EPIP-EOF-24,pages 1-3,encl LIC-99-0087, Forwards Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams1999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams LIC-99-0088, Forwards Documentation Associated with SRO License Renewal Application for Cd Darrow.Applicant Has Satisfactorily Completed Applicable FCS Requalification Program.Without Encls1999-09-16016 September 1999 Forwards Documentation Associated with SRO License Renewal Application for Cd Darrow.Applicant Has Satisfactorily Completed Applicable FCS Requalification Program.Without Encls LIC-99-0080, Requests Approval of Attached Rev to QAP Contained in App a of Usar,Revising Commitment Re Qualifications of Personnel Performing Quality Control Insps of Activities Affecting Fire Protection1999-09-16016 September 1999 Requests Approval of Attached Rev to QAP Contained in App a of Usar,Revising Commitment Re Qualifications of Personnel Performing Quality Control Insps of Activities Affecting Fire Protection LIC-99-0085, Forwards Revs 18 & 19 to TDB-VI, COLR for FCS Unit 1,IAW TS 5.9.5.Rev 18 Resulted from Reevaluation of Cycle 18 Setpoints & Rev 19 Resulted from Changes in Cycle 19 Refueling Boron Concentrations & Addition of TS Parameters1999-09-0808 September 1999 Forwards Revs 18 & 19 to TDB-VI, COLR for FCS Unit 1,IAW TS 5.9.5.Rev 18 Resulted from Reevaluation of Cycle 18 Setpoints & Rev 19 Resulted from Changes in Cycle 19 Refueling Boron Concentrations & Addition of TS Parameters IR 05000285/19990081999-09-0707 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-08 on 990907-0811.No Violations Noted.Insp Consisted of Exam of Activities Conducted Under License as Relate to Safety & to Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations & with Conditions of License ML20211P2581999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-06 on 990809-12.No Violations Noted.Insp Consisted of Exam of Activities Under License as Related to EP & to Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations & with Conditions of License LIC-99-0083, Requests Participation in internet-based Y2K Early Warning Sys (Yews),As Noted in NRC Info Notice 99-25.Plant Point of Contact Will Be JW Chase1999-09-0202 September 1999 Requests Participation in internet-based Y2K Early Warning Sys (Yews),As Noted in NRC Info Notice 99-25.Plant Point of Contact Will Be JW Chase ML20211J9231999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards SE Accepting Licensee 990301 Requests for Relief Re Third 10-year ISI Interval for Plant,Unit 1.Relief Proposed Alternatives to Requirements in ASME B&PV Section XI,1989 Edition,Paragraphs IWA-5242(a) & IWA-5250(a)(2) ML20211L3241999-09-0202 September 1999 Informs That Due to Administrative Error,Page 2-50 of TSs Contained Error on 2.10.2(2) of Amend 192 to License DPR-40 Issued on 990727.Corrected Page Encl LIC-99-0077, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Revised EP Forms, Including FC-EPF Index,Pp 1 Dtd 990805,pp 2 Dtd 990812,rev 11 to FC-EPF-9,rev 12 to FC-EPF-10,rev 9 to FC-EPF-11,rev 2 to FC-EPF-12 & Rev 3 to FC-EPF-38.Proprietary EP Withheld1999-08-27027 August 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Revised EP Forms, Including FC-EPF Index,Pp 1 Dtd 990805,pp 2 Dtd 990812,rev 11 to FC-EPF-9,rev 12 to FC-EPF-10,rev 9 to FC-EPF-11,rev 2 to FC-EPF-12 & Rev 3 to FC-EPF-38.Proprietary EP Withheld ML20211F4491999-08-25025 August 1999 Forwards Ltr from Ja Miller,Dtd 990819,which Notified State of Iowa of Deficiency Identified During 990810,Fort Calhoun Station Biennial Exercise.One Deficiency Identified for Not Adequately Demonstrating Organizational Capability LIC-99-0076, Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Six Month Period from Jan-June 1999,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)1999-08-20020 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Six Month Period from Jan-June 1999,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) LIC-99-0078, Forwards Rev 16C to FCS Site Security Plan,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p).Rev Has Been Determined Not to Degrade Effectiveness of Current Security Plans.List of Changes, Provided.Encl Withheld1999-08-20020 August 1999 Forwards Rev 16C to FCS Site Security Plan,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p).Rev Has Been Determined Not to Degrade Effectiveness of Current Security Plans.List of Changes, Provided.Encl Withheld ML20210R1491999-08-13013 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-07 on 990719-23.No Violations Noted.Nrc Identified One Issue Which Was Evaluated Under Risk Significance Determination Process & Was Determined to Be of Low Risk Significance LIC-99-0075, Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1,per Plant TS 5.9.1.Revised Rept for June 1999,encl Due to Inadvertent Reporting of Gross Electrical Energy Data When Net Electrical Energy Data Was Required1999-08-13013 August 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1,per Plant TS 5.9.1.Revised Rept for June 1999,encl Due to Inadvertent Reporting of Gross Electrical Energy Data When Net Electrical Energy Data Was Required ML20211A9501999-08-12012 August 1999 Discusses 990720-21 Workshop Conducted in Region IV Ofc,Re Exchange of Info in Area of Use of Risk Insights in Regulatory Activities.List of Attendees,Summary of Topic & Issues,Agenda & Copies of Handouts Encl ML20211B7881999-08-10010 August 1999 Transmits Summary of Two Meetings with Risk-Informed TS Task Force in Rockville,Md on 990514 & 0714 ML20210N1991999-08-0909 August 1999 Informs That as Result of NRC Review of Licensee Responses to GL 92-01,rev 1,suppl 1 & Suppl 1 Rai,Staff Revised Info in Reactor Vessel Integrity Database & Releasing Database as Rvid Version 2 ML20210P8991999-08-0909 August 1999 Forwards FEMA Final Rept for 990630 Offsite Medical Drill. No Deficiencies or Areas Requiring Corrective Action Identified During Drill LIC-99-0072, Requests That Licensee 990526 Application for Amend & Related Documents,Be Withdrawn.Util Requests That NRC Review Attached Responses to Ensure That Upcoming Submittal Will Be Acceptable1999-08-0606 August 1999 Requests That Licensee 990526 Application for Amend & Related Documents,Be Withdrawn.Util Requests That NRC Review Attached Responses to Ensure That Upcoming Submittal Will Be Acceptable ML20210L1461999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Requests Submittal of Ltr Identifying Individuals Taking Exam,Personnel Allowed Access to Exams & Mailing Address for Exams LIC-99-0068, Documents OPPD Response to Requested Actions in GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1999-08-0202 August 1999 Documents OPPD Response to Requested Actions in GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal LIC-99-0040, Forwards Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Performed Per 10CFR50.59 & Revs to USAR Other than Those Resulting from 10CFR50.59.Encl Info Covers Period of 981101-9903311999-07-28028 July 1999 Forwards Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Performed Per 10CFR50.59 & Revs to USAR Other than Those Resulting from 10CFR50.59.Encl Info Covers Period of 981101-990331 LIC-99-0070, Requests Reinstatement of SRO License Previously Held by K Grant-Leanna (License SOP-43569).Operator Is Current on All requalification-training Topics & Has Completed License Reactivation Program1999-07-28028 July 1999 Requests Reinstatement of SRO License Previously Held by K Grant-Leanna (License SOP-43569).Operator Is Current on All requalification-training Topics & Has Completed License Reactivation Program ML20210G1851999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Amend 192 to License DPR-40 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Consists of Changes to TS in Response to 990129 Application LIC-99-0057, Forwards 1999/2000 Statement of Cash Flow from Operations, as Guarantee of Payment of Deferred Premiums for Period of 990630 to 0006301999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards 1999/2000 Statement of Cash Flow from Operations, as Guarantee of Payment of Deferred Premiums for Period of 990630 to 000630 ML20216D6951999-07-26026 July 1999 Informs That During 990614 Review of Fort Calhoun,Nrc Noted That Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator Has Entered White Band,Which Indicated Level of Licensee Performance That Warranted Increased Regulatory Response LIC-99-0071, Informs That Util Expects to Submit Four Licensing Actions in Each of Fys 2000 & 2001,in Response to Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates1999-07-26026 July 1999 Informs That Util Expects to Submit Four Licensing Actions in Each of Fys 2000 & 2001,in Response to Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates LIC-99-0069, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Epips,Including FC- Epf Index Page & Page 2 ,rev 0 to FC- EPF-42,EPIP Index (Page 1 of 2) & EPIP-OSC-2, Cover & Pages 19 & 20.Proprietary Encls Withheld1999-07-23023 July 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Epips,Including FC- Epf Index Page & Page 2 ,rev 0 to FC- EPF-42,EPIP Index (Page 1 of 2) & EPIP-OSC-2, Cover & Pages 19 & 20.Proprietary Encls Withheld ML20210D9471999-07-22022 July 1999 Forwards Amend 191 to DPR-40 & Safety Evaluation.Amend Authorizes Rev to Licensing Basis as Described in Updated Safety Analysis Rept to Incorporate Mod for Overriding Containment Isolation ML20210C2041999-07-20020 July 1999 Discusses 990715 Mgt Meeting with Midamerican Energy Co Re risk-informed Baseline Insp Program Recently Implemented at Cooper & Fort Calhoun Stations ML20210C0201999-07-20020 July 1999 Informs That Due to Administrative Oversight,Revised TS Bases Provided in to Fort Calhoun Station Were Not Dated.Dated Pages to TS Encl ML20210B0761999-07-19019 July 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-05 on 990601-0710.No Violations Noted ML20209G5351999-07-15015 July 1999 Informs That Staff Incorporated Rev of TS Bases Provided by Licensee Ltr Dtd 980904,into Fort Calhoun Station Tss. Staff Finds Revs to Associated TS Bases to Be Acceptable. Revised Bases Pages Encl ML20209F5741999-07-12012 July 1999 Ack Receipt of Transmitting Exercise Scenario for Upcoming Biennial Offsite Exercise Scheduled 990810.Scenario Reviewed & Acceptable ML20209G5591999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards Detailed Listing of Staff Concerns with C-E TR NPSD-683,rev 3 & RCS pressure-temperature Limits Rept LIC-99-0066, Forwards Fort Calhoun Performance Indicators Rept for May 19991999-07-0707 July 1999 Forwards Fort Calhoun Performance Indicators Rept for May 1999 LIC-99-0060, Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Revs to Fort Calhoun Station Emergency Plan Forms (Epf),Including FC-EPF,FC-EPF-1 & FC-EPF-17.Proprietary Info Withheld1999-07-0101 July 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Revs to Fort Calhoun Station Emergency Plan Forms (Epf),Including FC-EPF,FC-EPF-1 & FC-EPF-17.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20209D8771999-07-0101 July 1999 Summarizes 990630 Public Meeting Conducted in Fort Calhoun, Ne Re Results of Completed Culture Survey,Plant Status, Facility Activities Re New NRC Oversight Process & License Renewal.Licensee Handout & Attendance List Encl LIC-99-0063, Requests Termination of License Held by MR Anderson (License SOP 43812) for Fort Calhoun Station.Anderson Ended Employment Effective 9906241999-07-0101 July 1999 Requests Termination of License Held by MR Anderson (License SOP 43812) for Fort Calhoun Station.Anderson Ended Employment Effective 990624 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217G9261999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-10 on 990913-17.One NCV Noted ML20217G2331999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-09 on 990913-17.No Violations Noted ML20217B5111999-10-0606 October 1999 Forwards Amend 193 to License DPR-40 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises TS Sections 2.10.4,3.1 & Table 3-3 to Increase Min Required RCS Flow Rate & Change Surveillance require- Ments for RCS Flow Rate ML20216H7231999-09-29029 September 1999 Informs That Util 980325 Response to GL 97-06, Degradation of SG Internals, Provides Reasonable Assurance That Condition of Util SG Internals in Compliance with Current Licensing Bases for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20212L9571999-09-27027 September 1999 Informs That Follow Up Insp for Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator Will Be Conducted During Wk of 991001 IR 05000285/19990081999-09-0707 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-08 on 990907-0811.No Violations Noted.Insp Consisted of Exam of Activities Conducted Under License as Relate to Safety & to Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations & with Conditions of License ML20211P2581999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-06 on 990809-12.No Violations Noted.Insp Consisted of Exam of Activities Under License as Related to EP & to Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations & with Conditions of License ML20211L3241999-09-0202 September 1999 Informs That Due to Administrative Error,Page 2-50 of TSs Contained Error on 2.10.2(2) of Amend 192 to License DPR-40 Issued on 990727.Corrected Page Encl ML20211J9231999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards SE Accepting Licensee 990301 Requests for Relief Re Third 10-year ISI Interval for Plant,Unit 1.Relief Proposed Alternatives to Requirements in ASME B&PV Section XI,1989 Edition,Paragraphs IWA-5242(a) & IWA-5250(a)(2) ML20211F4491999-08-25025 August 1999 Forwards Ltr from Ja Miller,Dtd 990819,which Notified State of Iowa of Deficiency Identified During 990810,Fort Calhoun Station Biennial Exercise.One Deficiency Identified for Not Adequately Demonstrating Organizational Capability ML20210R1491999-08-13013 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-07 on 990719-23.No Violations Noted.Nrc Identified One Issue Which Was Evaluated Under Risk Significance Determination Process & Was Determined to Be of Low Risk Significance ML20211A9501999-08-12012 August 1999 Discusses 990720-21 Workshop Conducted in Region IV Ofc,Re Exchange of Info in Area of Use of Risk Insights in Regulatory Activities.List of Attendees,Summary of Topic & Issues,Agenda & Copies of Handouts Encl ML20211B7881999-08-10010 August 1999 Transmits Summary of Two Meetings with Risk-Informed TS Task Force in Rockville,Md on 990514 & 0714 ML20210P8991999-08-0909 August 1999 Forwards FEMA Final Rept for 990630 Offsite Medical Drill. No Deficiencies or Areas Requiring Corrective Action Identified During Drill ML20210N1991999-08-0909 August 1999 Informs That as Result of NRC Review of Licensee Responses to GL 92-01,rev 1,suppl 1 & Suppl 1 Rai,Staff Revised Info in Reactor Vessel Integrity Database & Releasing Database as Rvid Version 2 ML20210L1461999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Requests Submittal of Ltr Identifying Individuals Taking Exam,Personnel Allowed Access to Exams & Mailing Address for Exams ML20210G1851999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Amend 192 to License DPR-40 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Consists of Changes to TS in Response to 990129 Application ML20216D6951999-07-26026 July 1999 Informs That During 990614 Review of Fort Calhoun,Nrc Noted That Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator Has Entered White Band,Which Indicated Level of Licensee Performance That Warranted Increased Regulatory Response ML20210D9471999-07-22022 July 1999 Forwards Amend 191 to DPR-40 & Safety Evaluation.Amend Authorizes Rev to Licensing Basis as Described in Updated Safety Analysis Rept to Incorporate Mod for Overriding Containment Isolation ML20210C0201999-07-20020 July 1999 Informs That Due to Administrative Oversight,Revised TS Bases Provided in to Fort Calhoun Station Were Not Dated.Dated Pages to TS Encl ML20210C2041999-07-20020 July 1999 Discusses 990715 Mgt Meeting with Midamerican Energy Co Re risk-informed Baseline Insp Program Recently Implemented at Cooper & Fort Calhoun Stations ML20210B0761999-07-19019 July 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-05 on 990601-0710.No Violations Noted ML20209G5351999-07-15015 July 1999 Informs That Staff Incorporated Rev of TS Bases Provided by Licensee Ltr Dtd 980904,into Fort Calhoun Station Tss. Staff Finds Revs to Associated TS Bases to Be Acceptable. Revised Bases Pages Encl ML20209F5741999-07-12012 July 1999 Ack Receipt of Transmitting Exercise Scenario for Upcoming Biennial Offsite Exercise Scheduled 990810.Scenario Reviewed & Acceptable ML20209G5591999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards Detailed Listing of Staff Concerns with C-E TR NPSD-683,rev 3 & RCS pressure-temperature Limits Rept ML20209D8771999-07-0101 July 1999 Summarizes 990630 Public Meeting Conducted in Fort Calhoun, Ne Re Results of Completed Culture Survey,Plant Status, Facility Activities Re New NRC Oversight Process & License Renewal.Licensee Handout & Attendance List Encl ML20196F4931999-06-24024 June 1999 Discusses 990617 Public Meeting at Dana College,Blair,Ne Re Overview of Pilot Insp Program ML20196D2321999-06-21021 June 1999 Forwards Corrected Cover Ltr for Insp Rept 50-285/99-04. Original Cover Ltr Incorrectly Stated That Rept Contained Two Noncited Violations,When Rept Actually Documented Only One ML20195J2121999-06-14014 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Ltr Dtd 990316,which Transmitted Rev 16B to Site Security Plan,Rev 2 to Safeguards Contingency Plan & Rev 6 to Training & Qualification Plan for Plant,Under Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) IR 05000285/19990041999-06-11011 June 1999 Corrected Ltr Forwarding Insp Rept 50-285/99-04 on 990425-0531.Insp Determined That One Violation of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as Noncited Violation, Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20195J2481999-06-11011 June 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-04 on 990425-0531.Violations Identified & Being Treated as Noncited ML20195G3141999-06-10010 June 1999 Ack Receipt of & Encl Objectives for Facility Emergency Plan Exercise,Scheduled for 990810 ML20195E8391999-06-0909 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Transmitting Changes to Licensee Emergency Plan,Rev 14 & Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure OSC-1 Under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section IV ML20207G4741999-06-0808 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Fort Calhoun Station EP Implementing Procedure EPIP-OSC-1, Emergency Classification,Rev 31,under Provisions of 10CFR50, App E,Section V ML20207G4631999-06-0808 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Fort Calhoun Station Ep,App B,Rev 4,under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section V.No Violations Identified During Review ML20207G2981999-06-0808 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Fort Calhoun Station Radiological Er Plan,Section E,Rev 22,under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section V.Nrc Approval Not Required Due to Determination That Effectiveness Unchanged ML20207G4661999-06-0808 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Fort Calhoun Station EP Implementing Procedure EPIP OSC-1, Emergency Classification,Rev 30,under Provisions of 10CFR50, App E,Section V ML20195G3621999-06-0808 June 1999 Ack Receipt of ,Which Transmitted Changes to Fort Calhoun Station Emergency Plan,App A,Rev 15,under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section V.Nrc Approval Not Required ML20207G3401999-05-27027 May 1999 Informs That NRC Held Planning Meeting on 990511 for Fort Calhoun Station to Identify Insp Activities at Facility for Next 6 to 12 Months.Informs of NRC Planned Insp Activities & Offers Licensee Opportunity to Provide Feedback ML20207A9041999-05-24024 May 1999 Informs That NRR Reorganized,Effective 990328.As Part of Reorganization,Div of Licensing Project Mgt Was Created. Reorganization Chart Encl ML20206U6331999-05-18018 May 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-03 on 990314-0424.Four Violations of NRC Requirements Identified & Being Treated as Noncited Violations Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20206L4151999-05-10010 May 1999 Forwards SE of OPPD Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20206H4471999-05-0707 May 1999 Informs That on 990407,NRC Administered Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam.Licensee Facility Did Not Participate in Exam,However,Copy of Master Exam with Answer Key,Encl for Info.Without Encl ML20206E7201999-04-28028 April 1999 Responds to Meeting Conducted 990419 in Fort Calhoun,Ne Re Results of PPR Completed 990211.Addl Topics Discussed Included New Assessment Process & Upcoming Actions Planned in Response to Y2K Concerns ML20205Q5671999-04-15015 April 1999 Forwards Amend 190 to License DPR-40 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises TS 5.2.f & TS 5.11.2 to Change Title of Shift Supervisor to Shift Manager ML20205J2751999-04-0202 April 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-02 on 990131-0313.No Violations Noted.During Insp,Licensee Conduct of Activities at Fort Calhoun Station Generally Characterized by safety-conscious Operations,Sound Engineering & Maint Practices ML20205A7191999-03-19019 March 1999 Informs That on 990211 NRC Staff Completed PPR of Fort Calhoun Station.Review Was Conducted for All Operating NPPs to Develop an Integrated Understanding of Safety Performance ML20207K6151999-03-11011 March 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/99-01 on 990208-26.One Noncited Violation Was Identified ML20207E8691999-03-0303 March 1999 Forwards Correction to Amend 188 to License DPR-40 for Plant,Unit 1.Administrative Error,Three Pages of TSs Contained Errors,An Incorrect Page Number,Missing Parenthesis & Misspelled Words ML20203F2041999-02-11011 February 1999 Informs That During 990208 Telcon Between Mc Ralrick & J Pellet & T Stetka,Arrangements Were Made for Administration of Licensing Examinations at Fort Calhoun Station for Week of 991018 1999-09-07
[Table view] |
Text
>R Mcg UMITED ST ATES j , ?g IVUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j !, 'l ,j REcioN iv o 8 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, $UITE 400
/ AR LINGTON, T E X AS 76011 8064
=****
DEC 8 1993 Docket: 50-285 .
. License: DPR-40 !
Omaha Public Power District ATTN: T. L. Patterson, Division Manager Nuclear Operations Fort Calhoun Station FC-2-4 Adm.
P.O. Box 399, Hwy. 75 - North of Fort Calhoun Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023-0399
SUBJECT:
TASK INTERFACE AGREEMENT: INTERPRETATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS - 93TIA006 (TAC NO. M86339)
The purpose of this letter is to provide for your information a copy of the guidance recently issued by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation in their Memorandum of November 2, 1993, to Region IV (see enclosed). This' guidance !
was provided in response to a Region IV request for interpretation of reporting requirements related to multiple failures of safety-related components that are identified during the performance of surveillance testing. ;
We plan to implement this guidance during out future inspections at your facility. Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Tom Westerman of my staff at 817-860-8145. >
rector Division of Reactor Safety ,
Enclosure:
(as noted) cc w/ enclosure:
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae ,
ATTN: Mr. Michael F. McBride '
1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW '
Washington, D.C. 20009-5728
- Washington County Board of Supervisors. ;
ATTN: Jack Jensen, Chairman Blair, Nebraska 68008 '
Combustion Engineering, Inc. l ATTN: Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington Nuclear Operations !
12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 Rockville, Maryland 20852 9312200304 931208 .)
ADOCK0500g5 1
PDR e
I 1
.. j Omaha Public Power District :
bec to DMB (IE01) - DRS and DRP \
bectoDMB(IE06)-RadiologicalPr\\ otection Reports bec to DMB (IE35) - Emergency Preparedness Reports bcc distrib. by RIV:
J. L. Milhoan. Resident Inspector DRSS-FIPS Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503 MIS System RIV File Section Chief (DRP/TSS)
Pete Erickson, NRR Project Manager (MS: Il-B-20)
E. Adensan, NHSS 4 E4 W. Reckley, NRR 13 HIS '
i t
i P
i
.i RIV:C:ES T DD:DRS D:DRP D:DRS .
TFWesterman ATHowell ABBeach SJCollins l
/) / cL/93 / /93 / ' /93 / /93 l
\1
Omaha Public Power District ,
Nebraska Department of Health ATTN: Harold Borchert, Director Division of Radiological Health ,
301 Centennial Hall, South P.O. Box 95007 '
Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-5007 ,
Fort Calhoun Station ATTN: James W. Chase, Manager P.O. Box 399 Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023 f
f f
L 1
(
4
' Omaha Public Power District i bec to DMB (IE01) - DRS and DRP bec to DMB (IE06) - Radiological Protection Reports bcc to DMB (IE35) - Emergency Preparedness Reports bec distrib. by RIV:
J. L. Milhoan Resident Inspector -
DRSS-FIPS Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503 MIS System RIV File Section Chief (DRP/TSS)
. Pete Erickson, NRR Project Manager (MS: ll-B-20)
E. Adensan, NMSS 4 E4 W. Reckley, NRR 13 HIS 4
i RIV:C:ES 457 DD:DRS D:DRP D:DRS TFWesterman ATHowell ABBeach SJCollins O /0493 / /93 / /93 / /93
arc UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[A*
g i h[l[4 }
f WASHINGTON, D.C. 20556-0001 November 2, 1993
'% .#*../
MEMORANDUM FOR: Samuel J. Collins, Director Division of Reactor Safety Region IV FROM: Elinor G. Adensam, Assistant Director for Regions IV and V Division of Reactor Projects III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
TASK INTERFACE AGREEMENT: INTERPRETATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS - 93TIA006 (TAC N0. M86339)
In response to your request dated April 13, 1993, we have reviewed the available guidance associated with the reporting requirements related to multiple failures of safety-related components that are identified during the performance of surveillance procedures. The specific examples cited in your questions regarded the outage surveillances related to primary or secondary safety relief valves and the discovery that the as-found setpoints were outside the allowable technical specification setpoint tolerances. Please note that the Public Document Room (PDR) has been included on the distribution for this response.
Licensees were stated to have presented interpretations of the reporting rules (10 CFR 50.72/50.73) and the related guidance provided in NUREG-1022, which supported the conclusion that the di:;avery of safety valve setpoint drift was not reportable. Specifically, questioc 2.3 of NUREG-1022, Supplement 1, had ,
been used to argue that the condition was not reportable, because the ,
condition could be assumed to have occurred at the time of discovery. Another ;
argument presented by licensees was stated to involve analyses or evaluations which determined that the degraded setpoints did not result in the plant operating outside its design basis, and therefore supported a conclusion that the condition was not reportable.
A review of 50.72 and 50.73 identifies several reporting criteria which might i be relevant to the discovery of safety valves outside the setpoint tolerances !
given in the Technical Specifications. These criteria and a discussion of I their applicability is provided in Enclosure 1. ;
The assessment can be summarized as follows:
- The use of question 2.3 t* NUREG-1022, Supplement 1, is not appropriate to justify a decision to not report many conditions found during l refueling outage surveillances. Other guidance in Supplement 1 is clear that if conditions are discovered during an outage, but are believed to have existed during operation, they are reportable so long as an applicable threshold for reporting is reached.
0' $,L[? S $ !? Y c6 l
n 4
Samuel J. Collins November 2, 1993
- A licensee may determine that a condition such as safety valve setpoint drift, does not constitute operation outside the design basis of the plant, and therefore not report such events in accordance with those criteria in 50.72 and 50.73. However, as discussed below, the condition may be reportable as a result of other criteria.
- 50.73(a)(2)(vii) is deemed the most relevant criterion for the reporting of primary or secondary safety valves found to be outside the acceptable setpoint tolerance. This is due to the fact that this criterion is based on the train or channel level and does not require the loss of a safety function but only the inoperability of multiple channels of a safety system. Some latitude might be given in light of the number of secondary safety valves; but, for most instances of setpoint drift, this criterion would result in the conditions being reportable.
- Note that we currently expect to include guidance along these lines in the forthcoming Revision 1 to NUREG-1022; if so, that specific. guidance should be consulted in the future in determining reportability.
Elinor G. Adensam, Assistant Director for Regions IV and V Division of Reactor Projects III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Criteria cc w/ enclosure:
W. Hodges, Region i A. Gibson, Region II G. Grant, Region III K. Perkins, Region V
e ENCLOSURE ,
1 ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICABILITY TO PRIMARY OR SECONDARY SAFETY VALVES FOUND OUTSIDE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACCEPTABLE SETPOINT TOLERANCE BAND l 50.72(b)(1)(ii) Any event or condition during operation that results in the 50.73(a)(2)(ii) condition of the nuclear power plant, including its !
principal safety barriers, being seriously degraded; or results in the nuclear power plant being:
5 (A) In an unanalyzed condition that significantly compromises plant safety; _
(B) In a condition that is outside the design basis of i' the plant; or (C) In a condition not covered by the plant's operating and emergency procedures.
Discussion: The applicability of these criteria is determined by an evaluation of the situation by the-licensee. Upon determining that the setpoints were outside the allowable i range of the technical specifications, the licensee would be ;
expected to follow the required actions of the technical !
specifications and assess the plant condition in regards to equipment operability and required corrective actions. j Guidance related to the evaluation of degraded and i nonconfoming conditions is provided by Generic Letter l 91-18. As stated in the second draft of NUREG-1022, i Revision 1, it is expected that licensees may use engineering judgement and experience in detemining whether !'
a condition meets these reporting criteria. The ability of a licensee to justify that a given condition is neither i unanalyzed nor outside the design basis is dependent on the '
as-found condition of the equipment and the degree of I analyses performed. ;
50.72(b)(2)(1) Any event, found while the reactor is shut down, that, had it been found while the reactor was in-operation, would have l
resulted in the nuclear power plant, including its principal !
safety barriers, being seriously degraded or being in an j unanalyzed condition that significantly compromises plant safety.
Discussion: The arguments are very similar to those above and again can support either a reportable or non-reportable conclusion 4 based on the licensee's assessment of the significance of :
the condition. However, this criterion was intended to !
capture potential problems which might be discovered only i during refueling outage surveillances. Question 7.10 in NUREG-1022, Supplement 1, is considered relevant guidance in regard to the reportability of equipment found to be inoperable during outage surveillances, f
Question 2.3 of NUREG-1022, Supplement 1, and the second draft of NUREG-1022, Revision 1, state that failures should be assumed to occur at the time of discovery unless there is l firm evidence to believe otherwise. It seems appropriate to classify setpoint drift as a mechanism which would occur some time (usually indeterminable) during the period between calibration and subsequent surveillance unless some factor, such as an extended outage or testing conditions, could be
- identified as a likely cause. If testing conditions or other causes are identified such that reporting is deemed unnecessary, the licensee would still be expected, under other programs and regulatory requirements, to evaluate the adequacy of the surveillance program to ensure that the activity is ensuring the operability of the safety valves or other components. A voluntary report may still be useful as a means of distributing the information related to the problem and its cause to the industry. Please note that ,
although question 2.3 may be deemed an insufficient reason '
to determine safety valve drift is not reportable, the licensee may determine that the significance (see above) of the condition does not satisfy the reporting threshold.
50.72(b)(2)(lii) Any event or condition that alone could have prevented the 50.73(a)(2)(v) fulfillment of a safety function of structures or systems that are needed to:
(A) Shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition, (B) Remove residual heat, (C) Control the release of radioactive material, or (D) Mitigate the consequences of an accident.
Discussion: The second draft of NUREG-1022, Revision 1, provides safety valve drift as an example of a common mode problem which may be reportable under this criterion. The example was added to the case described in Information Notice 85-27 which dealt with multiple inoperable control rods. Although certain occurrences of multiple safety valve drift problems should be determined to be reportable under this criterion, it should not be assumed that all cases of one or more safety valves exceeding the technical specification tolerance band need be reportable in accordance with this criterion. As in the previously discussed reporting criteria, the licensee's engineering judgement should determine if the condition could have prevented the ,
fulfillment of a safety function. Candidates for reporting include those cases in which the setpoints of multiple safety valves could have resulted in exceeding the associated system's design pressure. If experience or engineering judgement can reasonably estimate the maximum
4 i
e z j
drift which might occur and determine that the safety function would be maintained, the licensee can determine that the condition is not reportable.
Although discussed in the various drafts and revisions of: ;
NUREG-1022, it warrants repeating that the primary i motivation behind evaluating plant conditions such as safety valve drift should be to ensure safety and only secondarily to determine reportability. If engineering assessments -]
identify a problem and determine that plant equipment was not and reasonably could not be rendered inoperable by'a ;
phenomenon such as setpoint drift, the licensee can then i also justify a determination that the condition is not '
reportable. Voluntary reports are appreciated if.the l licensee feels the information might be helpful to others.
The staff should, as always, be cautious in reconmending .
that a. licensee make a " voluntary" report. l 50.73(a)(2)(vi) Events covered in paragraph (a)(2)(v) of this section may i include one or more procedural errors, equipment failures,- l and/or discovery of design, analysis, fabrication, ;
construction, and/or procedural inadequacies. However, i individual component failures need not be reported pursuant l' to this paragraph if redundant equipment in the same system was operable and available to perform the required. safety i function.
Discussion: (See above) j 50.73(a)(2)(vii) Any event where a single cause or condition caused at least one independent train or channel to become inoperable in :
multiple systems or two independent trains or channels to -l become inoperable in a single system designed to: l t
(A) Shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe .j shutdown condition, !
(B) Remove residual heat, .
1 (C) Control the release of radioactive material, or ,
(D) . Mitigate the' consequences of an accident. ;
Discussion: This criterion _may be the most relevant to the. specific example of safety valves found outside the technical !
specification. tolerance band. As stated in the second draft i of NUREG-1022 Revision 1,.the reporting threshold for this ,
part of-10 CFR 50.73 is lower than.for other parts since it 1 is at'the train or channel level rather than the system and- l function levels. Valves- found outside the technical !
specification setpoint tolerance band can reasonably be -l considered to have been inoperable during operation unless a -
licensee determines that testing'is.not representative of conditions during operation (see item 50.72(b)(2)(1)). This l
)
. . - - = - . - -
criterion was developed with general consideration given to the normal two train design level of redundancy. Given that most plants can satisfy pressure relief requirements with several main steam safety valves unavailable, a rigid '
interpretation of this criterion regarding the secondary safety valves (i.e., any case with more than one safety valve outside the tolerance band) may be overly conservative. However, the licensees are considered to have the weakest argument if they determine that this criterion is not applicable, and therefore the condition is not reportable, when finding multiple safety valves outside the acceptable range.
50.73(a)(2)(i.8) Any operation or condition prohibited by the plant's technical specifications.
Discussion: Available guidance regarding operability and technical specification requirements generally have licensees enter the allowed outage time and associated action statements upon discovery of equipment inoperability unless a definite time of inoperability can be established. Technical ;
specifications are considered satisfied provided the allowed l outage time and associated action statements are satisfied. l Therefore, provided that licensees restore ccmpliance prior to returning to power operation, reporting of safety valve drift in accordance with this criterion would not be necessary. However, it is expected that upon identification ;
of a problem such as safety valve setpoint drift, licensees ;
should take actions to prevent recurrence or pursue a change '
in the technical specification requirements (such as increasing the acceptable tolerance range of the setpoints).
If a licensee determines, through industry experience, information from a vendor, or self assessments, that a i component may be inoperable during operation, appropriate 1 actions should be taken in accordance with the technical )
specifications (reduce power or shutdown). This reporting criterion may be applicable if a licensee fails to satisfy the required action or can determine that a limiting condition of operation had not been satisfied for longer l than the allowed outage time following a specific cause for
~
a component becoming inoperable.
l i