ML20056E986
| ML20056E986 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 08/09/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20056E984 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-93-17, NUDOCS 9308250380 | |
| Download: ML20056E986 (1) | |
Text
_. _
i ENCLOSURE 1 l
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power Corporation Docket No. 50-302 l
Crystal River Unit 3 License No. DPR-72 l
During an NRC inspection conducted on June 6 - July 10,- 1993, violations of i
NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violations are listed below:
l 10 CFR 50.59(b)(1) requires that the licensee maintain records of l
changes in the facility and of changes in procedures made pursuant to l
this section, to the extent that these changes constitute changes is the facility as described in the SAR....
These records must include a written safety evaluation which provides the basis for the determination that the change, test, or experiment does not involve an unreviewed safety question.
l Contrary to the above, sometime prior to March 12, 1993, the MUT hydrogen regulator was adjusted, without the required safety evaluation performed, to greater than twenty pounds per square inch which is outside the required range of 5-15 pounds per square inch stated in FSAR, Section 9-1.
The regulator remained improperly adjusted until June 28, 1993, when the licensee questioned the setting and returned the regulator to a setting of ten pounds per square inch.
l This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement 1).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Florida Power Corporation is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the i
corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for l
information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending l
the response time.
i Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 9th day of August 1993 93082503e0 930809
??
1)
PDR ADOCK 0S000302 O
.