ML20045G531
| ML20045G531 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 07/02/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20045G528 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-334-93-12, NUDOCS 9307140083 | |
| Download: ML20045G531 (1) | |
Text
_____ - _
O e
ENCLOSUREI NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duquesne Light Company Docket Nos. 50-334 Beaver Valley Power Station License Nos. DRP-63 Unit 1 l
During an NRC inspection conducted between May 11 and June 14,1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1992), the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires that activities affecting quality have been prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with instructions, procedures, or drawings which include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria fc,r i
determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
Contrary to the above, on June 8,1993, an activity affecting quality, reactor coolant system heatup, was not accomplished in accordance with instructions or procedures which included appropriate acceptance criteria in that the operator aid for reactor l
coolant system pressure and temperature limitations curve, figure OM 50-11, issue 3, revision 8, was of the incorrert revision and contained outdated acceptance criteria.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duquesne Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Cantrol Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region 1, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation 93-12-01. This reply should be c1carly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time speci6ed in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modi 6ed, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
l Dated at King of Prussia. Pennsylvania i
this PJ1d day of July,1993 930714o083 930702 PDR ADOCK 05000334 i
G PDR OFFICIAL RECORD COPY l
l