ML20041A173

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-352/81-17 & 50-353/81-15 on 811201-820108. Noncompliance Noted:Failure of HPCI Pipe Spool DBA-106-1 to Meet Wall Thickness Requirements
ML20041A173
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/18/1982
From: Durr J, Mccabe E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20041A170 List:
References
50-352-81-17, 50-353-81-15, NUDOCS 8202190215
Download: ML20041A173 (8)


See also: IR 05000352/1981017

Text

7

_

.

.

,

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

Region I

50-352/81-17

Report No. 50-353/81 15

50-352.'

Docket No.

50-353

CPPR-106

,

License No.

CPPR-107

Priority

-

Category

A

Licensee:

Philadelphia Electric Company

2301 Market Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101

Facility Name:

Limerick Generating Station. Unit Nos. 1 and 2

Inspection at:

Limerick, Pennsylvania

Inspection conducted: December 1,1981 - January 8,1982

Inspectors:

nAL)

/

r/s2

P. Durr~, Senior Resident Inspector

/ date/ sig~ned

.

date signed

date signed

Nb

Approved by: _

/ b8 IBZ

t.

L. Nctace, tniet, Keactor

date signed

Projects Section 2B

Inspection Summary: Report 50-352/81-17 and 50-353/81-15 performed on December 1, 1981

through January 8,1982.

Areas: A routine, unannounced inspection by the Senior Resident Inspector of pipe

welding, piping documentation, safety related structures, electrical separation,

plant tours, and licensee action on open items. The . inspection involved 64.5

inspector-hours at Unit 1 and 10 inspector-hours at Unit 2.

Results:

One violation was identified in the six areas examined (violation of

minimum pipe wall, para. 5 ).

Region I Form 12

(Rev. April 77)

8202190215 820204

PD9 ADOCK 05000352

i

G

PDR

__

'

.

.

,

DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

Philadelphia Electric Company

D. T. Clohecy, Quality Assurance Engineer (QAE)

J. M. Corcoran, Field QA Branch Head

F. J. Coyle, QAE

M. J. McGill, QAE

G. J. Moffitt, Construction Engineer

P. K. Pavlides, Manager, QA

R. T. Scott, Lead Construction Engineer

Bechtel Power Corporation

G. D. Abbey, Subcontracts Engineer (SCE)

T. Altum, Assistant Project Field Engineer (APFE)

M. J. Baron, Lead Field Welding Engineer

R. D. Bryan, Project Field Superintendent

H. D. Foster, Project Field Quality Control Engineer (QCE)

H. E. Gilbert, Lead Mechanical QCE

J. J. Honer, SCE

D. Hunt, Lead SCE

G. C. Kelly, QAE

E. R. Klossin, Project QAE

D. F. Lerch, Long Term Maintenance Engineer

J. L. Martin, Lead Site QAE

A. Molinaro, Project Superintendent

.K. L. Quinter, Assistant Project Field QCE (APFQCE)

D. C. Thompson, APFQCE

Schneider, Inc.

T. M. Carroll, Project Manager

G. Heindrichs, Q.C. Manager

The above listed personnel attended exit interviews on December 10 or 23,

1981.

Other craftsmen, engineers, quality control technicians, and

supervisors were contacted and interviewed as the inspection interfaced

with their work.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

'

.

.

,

3

2.

Plant Tours (Unit Nos. 1 & 2)

Periodically during the inspection, tours were made of the Unit Nos.1

and 2 primary reactor containments, the reactor buildings, the control

>

structure, and surrounding yards and shops. The inspector examined

completed work, work in-progress, quality control activities, and equip-

ment storage, handling, and maintenance.

He discussed the technical

aspects of the wo,k with craftsmen, supervisors, and engineers to assure

work was being perfomed in accordance with requirements.

The inspector witnessed the vacuum box testing and magnetic particle

examination of the spacer to quencher weld FPGW-F on drawing C-263,

in Unit #1 containment.

He reviewed the procedures 25.A.2, Leak Testing

of Welds, and 3.21. A.3, Dry Particle Yoke Method, and verified that the

work was perfomed in accordance with the procedures.

Ventilation dampers BPD-203-38A and BPD-203-39A were observed to be

temporarily stored at elevation 217', area 16, without the proper coverings

to protect them from construction activities. Further investigation

disclosed that the licensee has a similar audit finding, Finding Reports

M-520 and M-536.

Corrective actions are being teken by the licensee and

will be examined during a future inspection. This item is unresolved

pending completion of the licensee's actions.

(352/81-17-01)

3.

Previous Inspection Findings

(Closed) Unresolved Item (352/76-07-4b)

The licensee stored carbon steel pipe spools outside without protective

covers. The storage practice was reviewed by NRR (Memorandum A. Schwencer

to R. Keimig, November 27,1981) and found to be acceptable.

This item

is closed.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (352/79-11-03)

The welding details for drawing C-956 were not adequately prescribed.

Full penetration groove welds were being made, in see cases, with a

fillet weld covering. The inspector viewed this as added reinforcement.

The licensee clarified the drawing by adding note 3, Revision 6, which

pemits fillet welds to be used in cabination with groove welds. This

is consistent with the AWS Code D 1.1, figure 2.9.1.b, note 3.

This item

is closed.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (352/79-11-04)

Welding rod fra GE-I&SE was found to be improperly stored. The licensee

had a similar finding the preceding day and initiated corrective actions.

The inspector reviewed a letter fr m Philadelphia Electric to GE-I&SE,

dated March 20, 1980, which documented the corrective actions. GE-I&SE

'

has cmpleted their contract for the reactor pressure vessel nozzle safe

ends and left the site. This item is closed.

i

-._m

.__ _ _ . __ _

!

.

.

4

(Closed) Unresolved Item (352/80-02-02)

There was a disparity in the quality documentation for pipe spools in

the recirculation loop. The documentation showed that the pipe spools

were fabricated in accordance with the ASME III Code, Summer 1978

edition; while the purchase order specified the Summer 1977 edition.

The inspector examined Revision 2 of the purchase order, 205-AL852

and found that the latest Revision specified ASME III Code, Winter 1977

edition.

However,10CFR50.55(a) pemits the use of ASME III Codes,1977

edition, including addenda through Summer 1979. This item is closed.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (352/81-05-01)

The inspector noted electronic trip units loosely secured in their panels.

No documentation was available to indicate that authorized work was perfomed.

The licensee has located infomation which indicates that these trip units

were removed and inspected as part of GE's Field Disposition Instruction

TNEJ and Field Deviation Disposition Request 1068. The licensee has

recalibrated the units and verified reinstallation. This item is closed.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (352/81-01-07)

The licensee used the calculated minimum pipe wall thickness on the welding

documents. This resulted in welders being assigned to weld pipe walls

beyond their qualified thickness range.

The licensee revised Job Rule

JR-G-16, paragraph 16.3.1, to require the field to make measurements of the

pipe wall when only the minimum wall thickness values are supplied. Further,

the licensee issued a Nonconfomance Report NCR4585, which identifies the

welders who welded beyond their qualified thickness range. This item is

closed.

(0 pen) Unresolved Item (352/81-16-01)

The castings for the main steam isolation valves do not appear to satisfy

the ASME Draft Pump and Valve Code. The issues involved and updated

information are summarized as follows:

,

(1) The body castings appear to have exceeded the allowed heatup

and cooldown rates on heat treatment. Further review by the

,

l

inspector disclosed that the heatup and cooldown rates for

postweld heat treatment do not apply to the materials manu-

facturer. This is supported by later editions of the ASME III

Code, paragraphs NB-2975.5. This item is resolved.

l

l'

(2) The welding procedure was not qualified for the post weld heat

treatment (PWHT) temperature.

The licensee has stated that

'

there is reason to believe that a Procedure Qualification Record

exists which will support the PWHT used. This item remains

open.

l

l

d

,

..

,

5

(3) Nondestructive testing was perfomed before heat treatment.

The licensee maintains that the 13400F' heat treatment was a

post weld heat treatment and not a tempering operation perfomed

under-the material specification. Documentation will be provided

to substantiate this position. This item remains open.

(4) Repair excavations were not nondestructively tested before

rewelding. The licensee presented documentation'which indicates

that nondestructive examinations were perfomed prior to rewelding

excavations. This_ item is resolved.,

(5) Repairs and heat treatments. were not performed sequentially

in accordance with the procedure. The licensee has presented

infomation which shows that the General Electric Company did not

approve the revision of the procedure supplied in the quality

documentation until circa 1973. This implies that an earlier

version of the procedure was being used at the time of the

casting manufacture.

The May 7,1971 revision states that, " Welding shall be performed

on castings which have been nomalized or nomalized and tempered."

The October 26, 1971 version states, in part, "have been nomalized

and tempered."

In addition, the Procedure Qualification Record, dated February 1,

1965, which supports the May 7,1971 version is not qualified

for the thickness ranges welded. The Procedure Qualification

Record was retested on October 26, 1971 to upgrade the thickness

range to 8 inches, which qualifies the welding on the casting.

This coincides with the date of the later procedure revision.

Furthermore, the May 7,1971 version limits post weld heat

treatment temperatures to 1300 F.

This item remains open.

(6) Because of the foregoing items, it appears there was a breakdown

in the quality assurance program. This item remains open

pending the resolution of the other items.

.

. -

.-

.

-

s

A

1

6

(0 pen) Unresolved Item (352/81-16-02)

The high pressure coolant injection (HPCI) turbine manual specifies a

levelness of 2 mils per foot. This levelness value was established

after the turbine was installed. The licensee presented a telephone

conversation report with the nuclear steam system supplier which

indicates that they feel the 2 mils per foot is not a requirement.

This has not been verified with the turbine manufacturer. This item

remains unresolved pending verification by the turbine manufacturer.

(Closed) Construction Deficiency Report (352/80-00-03)

An improper application of brass lock washers allowed the loosening

of operating linkage nuts on 4 KV switchgear. Testing revealed a design

deficiency within the linkage itself and corrective actions consisted of

replacing the linkage. The inspector reviewed the completed Nonconformance

Report, No. 4143, which documented the repairs and the PEC0 Audit Report,

No. E-088 which verified the corrective actions.

He discussed the repairs

with the responsible inspector and examined a completed installation.

This item is closed.

(0 pen) Construction Deficiency Report (352 and 353/80-00-04)

The mounting feet of the emergency diesel generator heat exchangers were

not properly mating on the outer edges. This invalidated the seismic

analysis. The repair consisted of inserting shims to compensate for the gap

and welding the shims in place. The inspector reviewed Nonconformance

Report, No. 4308, which directed the repairs and examined the 4 Unit No. 1-

heat exchangers that are installed. He noted that the shim packs were

added to the outer edges of the heat exchanger feet to correct for gaps at

those locations.

However, . in doing so, gaps have been introduced between

the bolts. The licensee has been asked to verify that this was the intent

of the modification. This item remains open.

(0 pen) Part 21 Report (H06000516)

'

Bergen Patterson reported potential interferences between the strut assembly

and certain models of Pacific Scientific shock arrestors. This was reported

in IE Circular No. 79-25.

The licensee has listed the circular in his

computer tracking system and currently shows this item open.

The inspector examined site documentation for the status of corrective actions

and found the following:

(1) Quality Control inspected the equipment in the warehouse.

The problem only manifests itself when the equipment is

assembled and installed.

(2) Subsequent to the inspection, engineering issued a Field

Material Requisition to return the equipment to the

manufacturer for modification. Quality Control was unaware

of these actions. Further, the current status of the modi-

fication could not be readily ascertained. This was the result

of not tracking the activity in a fonnal document system.

This item remains open pending completion of the modification.

~

.

.

,

7

4.

Containment Structural Steel Welding

Recirculation pump restraint, B32-G003-Cl.7, and ventilation cooler supports,

1BV212 and 1FV212, were selected for welding document review and weld

examination. The document review verified welding, nondestructive testing

(where applicable), and inspection activities. The weld examination

consisted of visual and dimensional checks of the welds and structural

components.

It was noted during the review of Quality Control Inspection Record

C-1415-W-1 that hold point inspections of full penetration groove weld

preheat and interpass temperatures, paragraph 2.4.a, had not been performed.

The affected welds are C-1415, FPGW 17-19, 32, 33, 36-38, and 43-47.

This item is unresolved pending verification of weld oint status and a

detennination for the cause of omission (352/81-17-02

Further, during the inspection of support 1BV212, it was noted that a

column base plate to tube steel weld was only made on three sides.' The

drawing required welding on four sides. The drawing series had an FCR

for a similar weld which allowed welding on three sides but it did not

reference this particular detail. The licensee issued FCR C8934F which

corrected this deficiency. Also, detail 6 was missing a weld size symbol.

This was identified on PEC0 Finding Report N-296.

The inspector had no further questions concerning these matters.

5.

Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping

The accessible portions of the high pressure coolant injection (HPCI) steam

supply line and the core spray (CS) cooling line were selected for a

"walkdown" inspection. The HPCI piping examined is depicted on isometric

drawings DBA-106-1 and DBA-106-2. The CS piping is shown on isometric

drawing DCA-319-1. The inspection verified the location and configuration

of the piping and welds, rough measurements of design lengths were made,

and surface appearance of the pipe and welds was examined.

What appeared to be seams were identified in the flow element, serial

number 50517-1, located in the HPCI steam line. The applicable material

specification SA-1068 permits seams up to 5% of the wall thickness, in this

case .029".

The seams were measured to be less than 1/32" and acceptable.

A ground area was noted on HPCI pipe spool DBA-106-1.

Ultrasonic pipe wall

measurements determined the pipe wall to be approximately .500" thick in

the ground area. The material specification SA-106B, paragraph 18.3,

pennits wall thinning up to 12.5% of the nominal value. The Bechtel

-

.

.

,

8

Specification, P-300, requires schedule 80 pipe to be used for 10"

diameter "DBA" class pipe. Specification SA-106, table A2, for .593"

nominal wall pipe permits a minimum thickness of .519".

The failure of

pipe spool DBA-106-1 to meet minimum wall requirements is a violation of

10 CFR 50.55a.

(352/81-17-03)

The inspector selected eight additional pipe spools, varied by system,

size, and pipe class, for ultrasonic pipe wall thickness measurement. The

following pipe spools were examined:

PIPE SPOOL

SIZE

SYSTEM

GBC-101-7

12"

Main steam relief

DLA-108-1-5

12"

Feedwater

DLA-108-1-1

20"

"

DLA-ll2-3-3

12"

Residual heat removal

DLA-107-1

12"

Feedwater

DLA-112-1

12"

Residual heat removal

EBB-129-1-6

14"

HPCI pump discharge

GBB-101-1-4

18"

Residual heat removal

No further violations were identified.

Reactor coolant pressure boundary (ASME III, Class I) and other safety

related pipe welds (ASME III, Class II and III) were selected for document

review and observation of welding activities. The document reviews verified

the welder's qualifications, proper welding procedures were employed,

required nondestructive tests specified, appropriate quality control inspection

points specified and signed off, and proper preheat and postweld heat

treatments were required. The observation of welding consists of, where

applicable, examination of the cleanliness, fitup, and alignment of the parts;

proper welding equipuent; purge and cover gas flow rates; electrodes and

filler materials; appearance of the weld deposit; evidence of quality control

activities; and proper documentation. The following welds were examined:

Weld No.

Class

System

Status

BWRPD-lRECl-WB41

I

RHR Supply

F, R

"

"

WB33

I

RHR Return

F,R,C

WB3

I

Recirc Valve

D

"

"

"

"

WA6

I

Recirc Pump

D

"

"

WBil

I

Header Riser

D

"

1MSl WC2

I

Main Steam

D

"

"

WC15

I

HPCI Connection

D

Status Code: F - fitup, R - root pass, C - cover pass, D - document review

No violations were identified.

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _