ML20040F689
| ML20040F689 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Limerick |
| Issue date: | 05/25/1971 |
| From: | Knuth D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20040F238 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-81-385 NUDOCS 8202100127 | |
| Download: ML20040F689 (1) | |
Text
-
~
~
W W R. s,. Q. W. 9. 2. 5 M g._
,---ls.Qy.G.~4..;m-r. y. r..,,y.,'T.Y,.
s.. y,,
t.,.. :b..
n,
.,9
- 4..
6..
,. m.
g y,. + u.
,f.:
- c.,,,... :.$ -
.t
-. e ~p:.. >l. _.. -
. '..... 2;s
'f.. <.? ".,s @ l, ? '\\,2,*:. L....*,'.g*,
.,4
.3.....
..; x. ;
v a.,..,*
,e " - Q.,e,.
'! _(, q #
s;
%. 's.ie.s t p.... > Y.
- b. n ;. -,,,.;.. p, -*,-**[l.
.,....'.t.-
..S y%.,...
.r-**.
v
~ ' '.
y'*.'
,, s-e.,*=
. -. pe;_.
y,,
,. y,..,.h- [_f Q *,.,.,
F.*
, *g.? ~.. a6 "w*'*
V 1
._.s.
n.3
,y
< - =.
- g ;y.
[
r?
- (~
s o
' *l.. ' '*r' V.
L
/
..e w s
- ., ', -. ' f * *.
't
.,,,= ' 4fa.. 4. 4 w..
e't" ifs. Q..,g.
.,2',a ',-
, 0
/e.4 f'*e 3
s
,. i...
s.
.. p % 1 s ;
\\***'.p.,..
- g...
..r
- #.4%j-e, 4,
- f
..,,M.,..; Eg,- r >..
j./.'}: f g"gy, gy3,.,.pgg, g&g2Q);,...
i c.
- p yi&L;fQ W.&
- 1. S. Boyd, 'AfD :for BWR's, 3RLb, y-;$::L'i.W-:..
L.5%QQ $1:;;4%QQ9.!.f[id@y $f '
..it..
3.
4-
- ~
l' i'
' WY. '.
P. A. Morris, Director. 'DRL. ?-
,';. T^
?
ghu.Q4T/#M.' f.
E
.,
- f..,
THRU:
Q
.f
. n %:>. ~.'. ::-~, ;.;f.,\\.;
.-[G;f&g.M.[i'it;)y:,QQ.p.e -
i.j.
. REVIEW SCHEDULE FOR.NEEBOLD ISLAND,'.I.IMERICKf AND $1TI1Y 77'}W,geW
. [
Q. fb.uf.M."..
- . Q
- ' y
'? C.';.,... ;,,..-l W ' On May 17/ 1971, wereceived.questionsforlthe'abovelistedapplicasts.-d.a'[iO P.. =. from the Mach =nical Engineering. Branch 'of DRS...These 2hree questioni@D.". - ' E 1 'h" '7 , lists were essentially the same and reques'ted information on-whaWi : - ' ( codes are used, what ' limits are utilised,L and' design. criteria.foM%5 ;.l'.['. ' I O 4'l* - dynamic design of piping.and components. {The'Newbold;Ta S* a Limerick plants have been under review since February:of 1970'ain&', 5%. - 3 were scheduled for final ACRS review in July 1971.' lt=T11y has.been~ - { under review since August 1970 and scheduled for ACES review in - ~. -J August 1971. (In this instance H. Price informed the Chairman of-the Board all our questions were on the record.) 'I u It would appear to me that at this point in our reviev ve should ] / not be asking more questions but rather, should be =mWg decisions. In this regard I do.not propose to transmit these questions to.the j applicants involvedemaless directed otherwise. Ifdo request.==nagasent agreement that DRS translate these questions into ifirm regulatory.t!.M[M M -, requirements to be 'made pert of our ACRS report. and Safety Evalua. tion.'t ,j ~ . ;. p (;,., ,,.. ;.m.. .s s.w.. -. 3
- -..,.yg;s,/g.
I e .l D. 1. Inuth, Chief EWR Branch fl, DEL.. f
- - n.
F.Schroeder,itk. ~,,..,'. + '... ' ; O. '. cc: ~ W. nasss, DEL ,. m /:'. - G. Lear, DEL, V. Benaraya, DRL =. ~ ~ s ~ r .a.-, ~ --. ; U., h N-A ' * ' ' /: %, < ^
- DRL:BWRi1 DRLiAD/BWRs 7.
o_ omer > k [ gn [ B .-
- O 'b. --
2 5/.25/71 .. 5./. k./ 71 I. om > .. y. s.. '.. " ' %q #c / - M *'x ~. _ ascomema semx.n.-c -. .e 8202100127 811019 . m Z -385 PDR
- }}