ML20040F653

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Info for Instrumentation & Electric Power Sys Review of Newbold Island Nuclear Generating Station. Question Re Emergency Power for Limerick Encl
ML20040F653
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek, Limerick, 05000000
Issue date: 06/23/1970
From: Case E
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Morris P
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20040F238 List:
References
FOIA-81-385 NUDOCS 8202100033
Download: ML20040F653 (10)


Text

.

5 wo s.

UNITD STATES i..

.,.;st

\\

,g ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION p/

WASH INGTON. O.C.. ELO

%.%__nf, JUN 2 3.E70

%p o1 w\\

a..

.t

.t

'.3

e..

.~....e,,

.z c..Or r.

DivisiCn Of RCcC:cr T.iCCnsing

.. t

,fM

~

.....,s.i

c.,. ) -.C ~t.

... Gma.a"' "..u'

,c,"m"'.C".y " ^.~".~'i a 0 5 - 5 0.",.,4 & -3 5 5,'

..u m.

7

,., p-.u g.. c n y..n..

.m.,.. e,,;u..

..a..,

g s.

nf' Q.

~.

..,....e.:~.

C

.# w' '. ~..~~~ S ~ '. '. ' *. *. - ~ ~.. ^.c p wn' v..

C." C'.'.

..w.w.

6.

~~

'#~C~...".#'.".,'

C.~."."

^4

^

A.w s ~,

I c TJ M*C 0 th C '. thC OCOpC Oni dCpth GE thiS ICViCU bC TC'duCCd SOCCwh0:

.e vn p.. C ".. S * '."" C '. #. w'".1 p w"...# **.. ~ ~y g' #AC~'#A C "..s".

"A n #..", -pp. v'- w'..

~

..w.~

g

. ~..,. p C e,. c.. :s. 1.,.

-G w...... L, O.-.w

...e C.

e C

,.e G.:.CL

.e C

u.. C C\\.: Cb, W

i

..,s

.g

~.

~......

.?,....y

. L e

,r '

v.

.v-..

.~. C.a 06.u.a C r.Ct u....

u. w.

.u..

..u

_: g

..w.

...... :,n

m. c C.. 7

/

m.

cC s i,,,

3.,. vC O.

w f.v.w...

m..

g

- c p.:: =.: Mc. standcrdi:Cd. WC :rCn. csC :O reviCv NCubOld Isl:nd t..

~

4; e.' f y

,T.

.c' ).

e..

_.,..,m...

.u..

s.-.

.c s

a;W

.......:C...

w.

, p..

., cC a. :.. b u. C. u.,, w,

~

w.. c C.a........,. c...

c.

p

.-.w...

. u.

u.

u

.J....-(..

.... %.. c..c. p ?...,. : T. i 9."

w

.:,, C

. %.. C S

,s.

., nC.

S.n

.e pO.: O N

C rev 1:*1 (1. % C \\.. *... C

.*A 0 C..+.

,.,..y p OUC3 s j

-a-f..

. e..

g.

e

c.' ' C ". *. #.'..*

(.#... C.#. ".".. 'x ).# ". '.'."...".".#.*."..I t

z 1

,,.?,. 4C.

3

(.,,.

,.. : C :...

..: y q>.

o.u.. w,

,.p..t.

q

,5

..m.a

,s...

y e

ll h-.,

.......ms,

.nC p ) p u,.p a, C.'00

.. s.

..v.u,

-.. _.. - -.s C w.... :.w

u.. w.a..3

..'D,Or*.

s...

.....,..s,..-..C e

,s..-

v.

.s S

c,....

,n.

p,#

O 1 O, * ".

  • C'.'.'..

t.

  • l'.
  1. n Vw.*.*C

'4,3

. -.........s

2.r...

v...

gy ;,.:

.-..f

.s

-v s

n

_g

-. o..

v..1 r1CC. 1C c w..

e 1

..t

.g

..w.

.6

.m re

.,f..co...

,'q

...a..

. u..

w.

.t...

c

.-* T *g

., e... C v.

..,t...

.e g

..... 31SO C v.. t.........

wonC,-

u.

.. C..

...w....

..n

~.......,

,J C:.cc. 1.L, c c r s}' On 'l;

-s C s,. ~.g : n

-~ y.

.c c

...w.

w 6

L.......

0n..~ :c.

.... u..

.sO, h..n O :

e.h. C

- -........-.c

.w

...=

.~...

4 gr..C

nC.2
u..

-4' C,,,...

e.

1.:,.....:.

.s

.wt

.....w

-.c 3

...u 7

..:r:c:u..

..a.....:..

...e.

. s.

.y. g c.u c.e...,' O n *. O

~.1'. u

d

.....v..

. g.

c.ppl_ = c.:.

'sc CSE rav.,arcr will LC cvcilabic :O cid the projcC:

y

.n

.s. :.. v...

u.......:

. ~....r.

-,o rC\\.:C..,

.n.

A A C.,.

ev: ue:C the rccpcnt.s :O t..c;C questiCn: cad OthCr spCCific arc e.: icer.:m...C :,.,a y..v.

Or L.::.

-h' C202100033 811019 N

PDR FOIA Eu Z I TZER 81-385 PDR N

mQ

-m m mwwwn m m m w m m mm m m

.m r.

o 6

10, e

.s-i.

4 3.

c........

vu. s O gpg A.

v

-e 7.c 2C', uill not urite the protection end. control systc= section I[

of the t.CR*, report but vill provide n reper to D2L which cca bc

?' -

used : a basis for developing thic section of the ACas report.

4 s.

w

"... c DLL project iccdcr, l'.r. U. Ecacs, us inforned of this apprc ch 1,

4

..:.. i 1

...,.c

, tne es:.,gned S3 revicuer.

ey

..r.

v.

m.

c 1

.x

,/ g.

x N'.

y J

i.

.t.

"Y o

~,

,c succn v.

Case, D:. rector 9

c

,> ~. ; : w..

e.vic:..on c, acactor Standarc.s q

...2:;

B

, e' w

Cou.,,.

..e 1.

T.crccnc. ?cuer Syste

,a

s. (.. :w w. L..,.4.

s.

e

~

cr c v

.,.o 1 n...

....w

...u....

Q, c. 4 c'..e*

e

,a....

., + _

b *-

a.

,,t 9

wC I

~ $.,

a is

.s.

k *t

..g..

v-

.ce t.

oh e.

3.-

-[

/

,P W

5 s

' Iea m

df N..

N.

'Q l

J.N 1 8

' S.m q%.

I I

1

/ j hI y

Y w

g

.=

g 6

lQ 3.

w

.e i

4.

r t

J g

e

=

e2

,m.

q.

.h t

l q'

  • i Mw l

y.

<,.h-.1 q

T kh I

i t

_g

,_w e

,s I

o o

I 4

AUG 4 1970

(

N ENCLOSURE 2 k

QUESTIONS ON PROTECTION AND CCNTROL SYSTEMS t

(For transmittal to the applicant if the areas of concern are not y

adequately covered in the SAR)

M*)

1.

In regard to the protection systems which actuate reactor trip y

H and engineered safety feature action, the following information s!

should be provided:

_: ~

N

-> f a.

A list of those systems designed and built byCenaral Electric that are identical to those of the Edwin I.11atch Nuclear Plant

[i h

(as documented in the SAR) and a discussion of any design r

differences;

[$i4 b.

A list of those systems and their suppliers that are designed

$?y and/or built by suppliers other thanGeneral Electric

~

and

!?,

T i

c.

Identification of those features of the design which differ

_4j

_si from the criteria of IEEE 279 and the Commission's proposed

'M Tj General Design Criteria and an explanation of the reasons f

N for any differences.

1, 2.

In regard to the General Electric designed control systems,

~_

the following information should be provided:

+

n.

Identification of the major plant control systems (e.g.,

j primary te=perature control, primary water level control, 4

,w l

R p

GAR &iGOFMiuG3J4s'JE9EEEST.MUNYM%mm;41M. 6'MM'EGweEr5EImr O(

. 2:

o o

w

?.

7, 2

f.U 3 4 SO If::

'f, 5

_3y steam generator water level control) which are identical 31 o.

v to those in the E& sin I. Batch Nucicar Plant

and F

?.>.

\\

_u b.

A list and a discussion of the design differences in S

those systems not identical to those used in the E&rin I. Hatch

[x:

Nuclear F1mest This discussion should include an

'g q-evaluation of the safety significance of each design change.

]

3.

State the seismic design criteria for the reactor protection

,7 system, engineered safety feature circuits, and the emergency

[

power system.

The criteria should cover (1) the capability to

-j j

initiate a protective action during maximum peak acceleration, and (2) the capability of the engineered safety feature circuits

[

f to withstand seismic disturbances during post accident operation.

g Describe the qualification testing requirements which will be 3

i<

used to assare that the criteria are satisfied and the means by 3

3 which these requirements will be imposed on equipment suppliers.

j 4.

Describe the quality assurance procedures which apply to the f

equipment in the reactor protection system, engineered saftty

_-t feature circuits, and the emergency electric power system. This

?:5 description should include:

(a) quality assurance procedures 4,-

y used during equipment fabrication, shipment, field storage, field

/3 installation, and system co=ponent checkout; and (b) records pertaining to (a) above.

l e

a I

j h

'p 4

O O

it y

b

_i, 34" AUG 4 1970

f. '

3 cM 5

e 5.

Submit the criteria and their bases which establish the minimum

[V requirements for preserving the independence of redundant reactor

}

protection systems, engineered safety festare systems and Class IE*

[f:

f Electrical Systems through physical arrangement and separation and ie rs assure minimum availability during any

  • design basis event. The I

A. -

submittal should include a discussion of the ad=inistrative res-j pensibility and control to be provided to assure compliance with h!

these criteria during the design and installation of these systems.

h The criteria and bases for the installation of electrical cable

?

for these systems should, as a minimu=, address:

}f-2

_j a.

Cable derating.

l b.

Cable routing in containment, penetration areas, cable Y.

_t spreading rooms, control rooms and other congested or

_{

hostile areas.

I

\\

c.

Sharing of cable trays with non-safety related cables or I

witn cables of the same system or other systems.

((

d.

Fire detection and protection in the areas where these

-h y,

cables are installed.

}^}

{n e.

Cable and cable tray markings.

f.

Spacing of wiring and components in control boards, panels, h

h and relay racks.

x

  • Class IE electrical systems and design basis events are defined in the at Proposed IEEE Griteria for Class IE Electrical Systems for Nuclear Power kI Generating Stations (IEEE-308).

?i i

ti

--muvvw -e

=ng%-www-=mmm,yavaras.w -n

ry ~~

=

,!s y

ti o

wk 4

AUG 4E

%p lh'~

6.** State the design criteria for reactor protection system and

,g>

s :;

?

engineered safety feature related electrical and mechanical 5cb equipment located in the primary containment or elsewhere in N

R:

the plant which take into account the potential effects of

[j:<

i radiation on these components due to either normal operation a

or accident conditions (superimposed on long-term normal R

N,$

operation). Describe the analysis and testing performed to g

eru verify compliance with these design criteria.

_%p/

as 4{?.

7.** Identify all safety related equipment and co=ponents (e.g.,

+

motors, cables, filters, pump seals) located in the primary i[.,

h containment which are required to be operable during and subse-W-

$E g'.<'

quent to a loss of coolant or a steamline break accident. Des-cribe the qualifications tests which have been or will be performed d4 y

on each of these items to insure their availability in a combined 47D high temperature, pressure, and humidity environment.

g

&4 8.

State the criteria which have been established to assure that J!

~p loss of the air conditioning and/or ventilation system will 3g i,,j not adversely affect operability of safety related control and g

electrical equipment located in the control room and other x

2 M

w

    • Ihese questions relate to the engineered safety feature chapter of the
  • p.

SAR and should be forwarded to the applicant with other questions con-Y cerning that chapter.

$e n

W lU N N M d 9_ M D W I " T @ N ~

/# M W'N15[.$h[

1 7

a,

_.4

-['i 4tJG 4 1970 cdi,,

5 w

$f 5;

~Ib equipment rooms.

Describe the analysis performed to identify ys 1%

the worst case environment (e.g., temperature, humidity).

State

-#^J 2d' the limiting condition with regard to temperature that would g%

require reactor shutdown, and how this was determined.

Describe

~

any testing (factory and/or onsite) which has been or will be

['

5

~4 performed to confirm satisfactory operability of control and N{>:

electrical equipment under extreme environmental conditions.

-f7 un I

Ib 9.

Describe how reactor protection system and engineered safety z.n

-i r

Ec '

equipment will be physically identified as safety related if-equipment in the plant.

aAW 10.

Describe the method for periodic testing of engineered safety

_A,

m

-4 feature actuation to show it to be consistent with IEEE 279.

E.

We interpret IEEE 279 to require for engineered safety feature

^p' 4

actuation the same high degree of on-line testability required

)

B for the reactor trip system.

C Rb '

Provide a description of the instrumentation systens included

?

11.

-d

.gl in your design for remote monitoring of post-accident conditicac s.

within the primary containment. Provide an analysis to show y;

l that these systems are adequate over the full spectrum of M

M

=1 1

postulated accidents.

7'a

~~

)

Ep '!

_4e ij

.g Ae A

1 Jl
:l 3,

n i i*

f

~

g$22'21 H 5D+2rs w wu m w.. _ _ - _

,~-

o-o t

AUS 4 5 70

?

E 'T

.g.

)

MICLosURE.3-

-,1

6 5

QCTESTIONS ON ENERCE ICT 7012ER FOR LDERICE CENERATDtG ST E

y e

1, ;.

~

[

s Provide a drawing that shows the aerial trant tssion line rooting a

1.

both to and from the 220 kV and the 500 kV substations.

. 1 w

y

~.

Discuss the analyses to be performed to show that maither loss f[u I

2.

of a 1mnit of this station nor tha' loss of the largest 3==Har

}

b, unit oc the grid vill negate the ability to provide offsite hi 9

pomr to this station.

g, S*(

Clarify the apparent inconsistency between Figurn 8.4.1 and i

3.

Provide a description of the substation Figure 8.3.1 of the TSML.

fonders cutmeted to each of the 13.2 kY secanAarias of the start-g up transforwars as *nM ented on Figure 8.4.1 of the PSAL Describe the 4-c power system for both the 220 kV and the 500 kV 4.

substa teen.

r Provide the design critaria and tafomarinn mains the onsite 5.

electrical pwer aptems as follows-t b

~

The percentage of the continuous ratings of each diesel h,

A.

generator that the engineared safety features electrical l

The continoons rating is defined as loads will require.

that continuous load which will permit suppliar guaranteed 4

_.m

y =- w w.-u= x ~1ewru,1m q3 D, -

~

g

~

O O

X

]C.

2

, AUS 4 E70.

^7..

-S 7

7...

?k 6

operation at a 95% availability with an '=rmaat maine===

b.

.c M,

,ariod.

s,
p

-y

=[~

?

B.

he 2000-hour and the 30 stincte diesel generator overload 49

~

~

a tinga.

J-e M

C.

A description of the rg. ired prototype taats and pre-jj

~

+

opera *4nnal tests to assic= the adequacy of design and O

-r r

reliability of these largE capacity diesel generators

+%

.'a..

which are new to nuclear service.

Mst g

D.

Criteria for usinnining independence and separatico of Q'

wp the ecoling water system, fuel oil system, and the control bN system for each of the diesel generator smita.

~

.y e

OO.

E.

A table to illustrate the automatic and nur2nal sequencing M

.ht w

of *ian angineered safety feature electrical loeds on

?;Lj

(

M, -

each of the diesel generators. Include the time of each h

l

^N:

event and the electrical load, fror. the initiating signal

?j

.s.

x to a fully loaded c<= die 4 =.

P'

~c M@r.:

F.

A description and analysis to de=xxistrate that cooling water h

M to the diesel generators and other energency loads during g

Di loss of offsite power is allowable. Your proposed design tg with twosnergency service water pu=ps, one being supplied k

0 T4 $

m mz

~~

~ ~,

+

5 ys

$Y YZ M

25 o

O y:

y Y-AUG i EXi Enclosura.3 3

m W

gp Jg a.

from a nuit 1 amargency bus and the other from a Unit 2 16 35

. boa, aoea not a,,sar eo -as-3 the, ingle s.ttura orttert g

ze nu

~

b 6.

Provide the following information concerning the 24,125, ad -

?j,

32 l 250 voit d-c power systmas 4

3i

~

v1 12 '

~

w

  1. i '.,... '

A.

Se bases for =4M of each of the d-e battarias. -

g B.

A description of tha venti 1=rian system **i14H for the f.g

.,e battery rooms. Include bow independence and separation

jj sig are maineaina.

+,

Y' C.

With your arrangement of two 125 volt d-c batteries located F

v:

"D in a - room it can be assumed that a =<ni m event 5

l nay e===

all loads being supplied by both'betteries. to be

-y lost. Provide an analysis to justify that the safety of

.R^

N_

s the plant would not be jeopardised by this e,ent.

4 ri s

7.

Page 8.6-3 of the PSAR statas W%-t necessary for safe t*

xr shutdown of the plant is supplied with control power from redan-3+

a dant 125 volt battery sources. Zoes of one source would not

-FF prevent safe shutdown of the plant." Provide a more detailed

- h,

- k description to assure that a true split-bus design wi1I. be main n4w in achieving the above objective.

e

'A b i N_5 l

5 o.-

-g

..e

-x y

2n

-l1 '...' OLE..u %,

. ~ :).7-:

.E 4.

T

_ tj

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _