Text

Amend X to Environ Rept
	ML20038C689
Person / Time
Site:	Clinch River
Issue date:	12/11/1981
From:	; ENERGY, DEPT. OF
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20038C687	List: ML20038C686; ML20038C689;
References
	ENVR-811211, NUDOCS 8112140041
	Download: ML20038C689 (340)
	v • d • e

[D INSTRUCTIONS AMENDMENT X The replacement pages in the enclosed packets are to be inserted in the CRBRP Environmental Report as follows:

VOLUME 1 Section Pages to be Replaced Table of Contents Replace pages 1 and 2 Add page 2a Replace pages 8 through 10 Replace pages 15 and 15a Replace pages 17 through 20 List of Tables Replace page'31 (N Add page 31a Replace page 32 Replace pages 53 and 54 Replace pages 58 through 61 List of Figures Replace pages 65 and 66 Add page 66a Replace page 72 Replace pages 74 through 75 2.2 Replace entire section 2.2 plus page 2.3-1 (68 pages) 2.5 Replace pages 2.5-31a and 32 2.6 Replace page 2.6-83 ~

2.7 Replace pages 2.7-87d and 2.7-87e (J

k

')

A 041 etgpg3 C Dd d$0W 03000537 PDR

,n

\ ._ /'

VOLUME 2 Section Pages to be Replaced 3.2 Replace pages 3.2-1 and 3.2-2 3.5 Replace entire section 3.5 (39 pages) 3.6 Paplace page 3.6-1 3.8 Replace pages 3.8-8 and 3.8-9 4.1 Replace pages 4.1-3 and 4.1-4 Replace pages 4.1-7 and 4.1-8 Replace pages 4.1-11 and 4.1-12 Replace pages 4.1-15 and 4.1-16 5.8 Replace pages 5.8-2 through 5.8-4 and 5.9-1 6.1 Replace pages 6.1-32c and 6.1-32d Replace pages 6.1-329 and 6.1-32h Replace pages 6.1-32k through 6.1-35 (u)

Replace pages 6.1-37 and 6.1-38 ADD pages 6.1-38a through 6.1-38c 6.2 Replace pages 6.2-5 and 6.2-6 VOLUME 3 8.1 Replace entire section 8.1 (48 pages)

( 8.2 Replace entire section 8.2 (11 pages) 8.3 Replace entire section 8.3 (22 pages) 8.4 DELETE page 8.4-1 12.0 Replace pages 12.0-2 through 12.0-5 13.0 Replace pages 13.0-3 through 13.0-6 Remove pages 13.0-35 through 13.0-38a Replace with pages 13.0-35 and 13.0-38a Remove pages 13.0-41 through 13.0-46 l

Replace with pages 13.0-41 and 13.0-42,

,A 13.0-45 and 13.0-46

! (.)

l B

l l

4 VOLUME 4 Section Pages to be Replaced Appendix C Replace entire Appendix C (71 pages)

VOLUME 5 Amendment X Insert Amendment X Tab and page AX-1 O

l O

p

! TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Page TITLE PAGE FOREWARD FRONTISPIECE CONTENTS 1 LIST OF TABLES 31 LIST OF FIGURES 65 1.0 PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY 1.1 Introduction 1.1-1 1.1.1 Background 1.1-2 1.1.2 General Objectives 1.1-3 1.2 Need for the LMFBR Program 1.2-1 1.2.1 Advantages of the Breeder 1.2-1 1.2.1.1 Effici,ency of Energy Resource Use 1.2-2

1. 2.1. 2 Plant Effectiveness in Thermal Conversion 1.2-3 1.2.1.3 Environmental Advantages 1.2-5 1.2.2 Choice of the Liquid Metal Option 1.2-6 1.3 Need for the Demonstration Project 1.3-1

1. 3.1 Demonstration of Available Technology 1.3-3 1.3.2 Extension cf Current Technology 1.3-4 1.3.3 Development of Operating Data 1.3-6 1.3.4 Demonstration of Nuclear Parameters Necessary . 1.3-7 for Comercial Development 1.3.5 Demonstration of the Minimal Impact on the 1.3-10 Environment From Disposal of Radioactive Waste Materials 1.3.6 Demonstration of Equipment on a Large Scale 1.3-11 1

AMENDMDE X Decenber 1981 TABLE OF CCNTD71'S 1.3.7 Utility and Vendor Participation in the 1.3-14 INFBR Program 1.4 Imprtance of Timing and Consequences 1.4-1 of Delay 1.4.1 Uranium Resource Utilization Introduction 1.4-1 Date 1.4.2 Separative Work 1.4-2 1.4.3 Environmental Impacts Associated With 1.4-2 Delay 1.5 Sumary 1.5-1 2.0 'IEE SITE '

2.1 Site Location and Layout 2.2-1 2.2 Regional Demography, Land and Water Use 2.2-1 2.2.1 Population Distribution 2.2-1 2.2.1.1 Resident Population Within 10 Miles 2.2-1 2.2.1.2 Resident Population Between 10 and 2.2-2 50 Miles 2.2.1.3 Transient Population 2.2-4 10 2.2.1.4 Population Projections and Pcpulation 2.2-6 Density 2.2.1.5 PuDlic Facilities and Institutions 2.2-7 2.2.2 Uses of Adjacent Lands 2.2-7 2.2.2.1 Agriculture 2.2-8 8

2.2.2.2 Industry 2.2-8 2.2.2.3 Minerals and Mining 2.2-9 2

_, .u- *. .a . . p g ,e. , . . .

e.

j t

3 j,;

c. O-%t A ,

.i

w-s . .. 3

o - .

ps,~.x

'y e -

u: y ss ,

, ,t

% r .- T 1 , .g- 3

,N 4 g - .~.. g<

g, ,, .

gsg

=

s..j-t..s, p y.

w c j .

.s_ 3

} ,

N q-(%f; s , e . .

p(::YN - . b..

=_ j,

,sz <

hp ,'. .

s 4 R., K M,' ; g q d

~ ,

, + ..,f g

.= Qw.h .,1 o u p' s,p .. .; .

-4

+

k. n, LI**.

, , 4 \,

,. -i , v. ,;' ,

.M.

.. y - -

.l 7N'l( . D; gy (y '%, ,.. -

3 -.

} dN2NDf6Mf X ()7' y$ ( t: ~

J D'ecenbe'r y '1981M n, -<t'

,e

. - q. ,

- ~ ,

m

(

+

N, 4 t;, ;. . <

f'

,\ , .. ti - --

+

V,_

N OF ONmHS . m. , DJ' -

a ,. w aN

. . . . .e

, t .s y i

si. N, .

e 4 ,. .-\,.

i 2.2.2.4 Transportation .. e 2.2-b. c%. f *_~ '"',x' e - N. o ' .

2.2.2.4.1 Highways 4~

229-4 s, is ' N g

] ,

2.2.2.4.2 Rail ,

2.2-10 1 cio? '

j s (. s, s~

u, >

2.2.2.4.3 Water ,

2.2-10. t ~ _,; , u. W.

. . 3. - .y,,

., 2.2.2.4.4 Air 2.2-10 e 1

_9, fy v ' ,s]

2.2.3 Water Use 2.2-11 j., ,

i .'

L i 2.2.3.1 Surface Water Use '2.2-11 . N^

-. p,-

i 2.2.3.2 Groundwater Use -A 2.2-13 ' / ,

N.

i

! 2.3 Regional Historical, Scenic, Cultural 2.3-l' I

and Natural Landmarks 2.3-1 2.3-1 Scenic and Natural Landmarks ,.

I

~ ,

_. 's

\I

='

.)

a.

v t

2a

s-s.

4 m

' AMEND. X DEC. 1981 s ,. #,}

[O ',

': . y x!

TABLE OF CONTENTS

( s'y Page

- i' r 1 3.2.2 ' e b; .fuchpescription 3.2-3

', 3.2.3

- Power'butput 3.2.3

' ' 3.3

~

' NPlank.WaterUse' 3.3-1 s

-s

, . 3,3s1 . 1 -Overallsliant 3.3-1

," " s _a Qeat.Diss,ipationSystem 3.3-1

.: ,', 3. 3.p ~ }s 3.3-2 3Q.s 3 s

( ,

Process Weter Treatment Systems s

3.3-2

' Waste Water Disposal System l9 w ,' -

, --3.3.4..esy s.

3.3-3

. x " 3.3.5" ' Radwaste Systems N s%

3.3-4 3.3.6 ,

3 Potab_le Water. System 5

3.3.7 4

x3 1 Sanitary s % \ , . . ,

Waste System 3.3-4 s

m o3 x , ,, ,

3.4s

- , Neat (Dissipation System 3.4-1

, , . . , s ~

7 ' 3.4-1 b .3.4.1 'v s General. Description

i

, , '- 90, ,

. s

~

3.4-2 i 33.4.2 ..

s Intake .

' 1, c- , ~ '_ t , c . .

n. ,

3.4-3

. 3. 4. 3 ' ' Discharge '\

~

.. .s . . s, % ~_ :

I '

3.5' , R~ad44ste4yy, tem 3.5-1

' O) ,: ,.

3.5-1 i ' L4 c.yi d Radv stem

' 'T ' ,.7 3.5)I 3.5-1 a, '; (" 3. 5.;h 1, j Sy4. tem Desta ., cion g

~

33.5.1.2 0 \ W yrpediate Activity Level Liquid Process 3.5-2 x , '

l l ., - w- .]. 'Sy3 tem

',%,,-, 3.5pl.3 s , s Low Activity Level Liquid Radwaste System 3.5-5 e- s s -

Assumptions, 3.5-6

's--;;-

,. ' 3.5.1.4 s -

s,,

~

i Balance of Plant Considerations 3.5-7

, - s s-

3. 5. h 5 , :'- ,

'- ss, Gaseous Radwaste System 3.5-7

. ' 3.5.2 -

s.

K . 3.5.2.1 i Nature and Origin of Radwaste Gases 3.5-7 3.5;2.2 Processing Method 3.5-8 Process Flow Diagrams (Typical System) 3.5-9 3.5.2.3 Leakage-Paths and Estimated Discharge Rates 3.5-10 3.5.2.4 10 3.5.2.4.1 Cover-Gas Leakage 3.5-10 Buffered-Seal Leakage 3.5-11 3.5.2.4.2 Pr[imaryPipingLeakage 3.5-11 3.5.2.4.3 3.5-11 10 3.5.2.4.4 RAPS and CAPS Leakage x

- 8

l 9

I

~

i l

l I

INTENTIONALLY BLANK I

(

i l

l l

l 1

l 9

AMEND. X DEC. 1981 TABLE OF ',0NTENTS Page 3.5.2.4.5 Intermediate Cells 3.5-11 3.5.2.5 Radiological Release Point Descriptions 3.5-12 8 3.5.2.6 System Performance 3.5-14 3.5.2.7 Balance of Plant Considerations 3.5-15 3.5.3 Solid Radwaste System Description 3.5-16 3.5.3.1 Concentrated Liquids 3.5-17 10 3.5.3.2 Compactible Solids 3.5-17 3.5.3.3 Non-Compactible Solids 3.5-18 3.5.3.4 Metallic Sodium in Containers 3.5-18 3.5.3.5 Sodium Bearing Solids 3.5-19 3.6 Chemical and Biocide Wastes 3.6-1 3.6.1 General 3.6-1 3.6.2 Heat Dissipation System 3.6-1 3.6.3 Waste Water Disposal System 3.6-4 3.6.4 Sewage Disposal System 3.6-5 3.7 Sanitary and Other Waste Systesm 3.7-1 3.7.1 Sanitary Wastes 3.7-1 3.7.2 Other Wastes 3.7-2 3.8 Radioactive Materials Inventory 3.8-1 3.8.1 New Fuel Elements 3.8-1 3.8.1.1 Core Assemblies 3.8-1 3.8-2 9 3.8.1.2 Inner / Radial Radial Blanket Assemblies 3.8.2 Irradiated Fuel Elements 3.8-3 3.8.2.1 Core Assemblies 3.8-3 3.8.2.2 Radial Blanket Assemblies 3.8-4 3.8.3 Radioactive Waste Material 3.8-5 3.8.3.1 Replacement In-Vessel Components 3.8-5 3.8.3.1.1 Control Rod Assemblies and Drive Lines 3.8-5 3.8.3.1.2 Radial Shield Assemblies 3.8-6 3.8.3.2 Other Radioactive Waste Material 3.8-8 0

9

AMENDMENT VIII February 1977 O

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3.9 Transmission Facilities 3.9-1 3.9.1 Location and Description of Right-of-Way 3.9-1 3.9.2 Physical Description of Corridor 3.9-1 3.9.3 Land Use 3.9-2 3.9.4 Terrestrial Ecology 3.9-3 3.9.4.1 Segment A-B 3.9-3 3.9.4.2 Segment B-C 3.9-4 3.9.4.3 Wildlife 3.9-4 3.9.5 Existing or Proposed Access Roads 3.9-6 3.9.5.1 Points 1 and 2 3.9-7 3.9.5.2 Points 3, 4 and 5 3.9-7 3.9.5.3 Points 5 and 6 3.9-7 3.9.5.4 Points 6 and 7 3.9-7 3.9.6 Areas of Historical and Archaeologicai Interest 3.9-7 3.9.7 Description of Right-of-Way 3.9-8 3.9.8 Design Description of Proposed Transmission 3.9-10 Line 3.9.9 Existing Substations Affected 3.9-12 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF SITE PREPARATION, PLANT AND TRAN5 MISSION FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION 4.1 Site Preparation and Plant Construction 4.1-1 4.1.1 Effects on Land Use 4.1-2 4.1.1.1 Clearing and Excavation 4.1-2 4.1.1. 2 Construction Facilities 4.1-4 4.1.1.3 Access Facilities 4.1-4 8

4.1.1.4 Chemical Wastes 4.1-6 4.1.1. 5 Sanitary and Other Wastes 4.1-6 4.1-7 8 4.1.1. 6 Impacts on Terrestrial Ecology 4.1.1.7 Impact on Human Habitation 4.1-9 10

AMENEMENT X r Decmber 1981 b'

TABLE OF CCNTDTIS 5.7.2.2 Predicted Noise Levels 5.7-la 5.7.2.3 Impact of Operational Noise 5.7-Ic 5.8 Resources Ccmnited 5.8-1 5.8-1 Ccnnitznent of Land Resource? 5.8-1 5.8.2 Ccanitment of Water Resources 5.8-1 5.8.3 Cm:nitrent of Fuel Resources 5.8-2 5.8.4 Irretrievable Ccanitrent of other 5.8-4 Resources 5.9 Deccnnissioning and Dimantling 5.9-1 3i 6.0 EFFLUDTr ND ENVIRGiMENTAL MEASUREMEtTIS AND MONTIORING PROGRAFS (G

6.1 Applicant's Preoperational Environmmtal 6.1-1 Program 6.1.1 Surface Waters 6.1-1 6.1.1.1 Baseline Mcnitoring Program 6.1-1 6.1.1.1.1 Physical and Chemical Parameters 6.1-4 6.1.1.1.2 Ecological Parameters. 6.1-7 6.1.1.2 Preconstruction-Construction Effects 6.1-25 Monitoring 6.1.1.2.1 Monitoring Program Description 6.1-25a 6.1.1.2.2 Results of Preconstruction Monitoring Program 6.1-28a 6.1.2 Groundwater 6.1-29 9

6.1.2.1 Preconstruction Groundwater Quality Mcnitoring 6.1-29 Program

(~'}

V 6.1.3 Air 6.1-30 15

O AMENDMDTP X Deceber 1981 TABLE OF CCITfD71S C .l .3.1 Meteorology 6.1-30 6.1.3.1.1 Teqorary Monitoring Systen 6.1-31 8 9

6.1.3.1.2 Permanent Monitoring Systen 6.1-32 9 6.1.3.2 Models 6.1-33 6.1.4 Land 6.1.33 6.1.4.1 Geology and Soils 6,1.34 6.1.4.1.1 Regional Investigation Program 6.1-34 ,h 6.1.4.1.2 Site Investigation Program 6.1-35 6.1.4.1.3 Results of Investigation 6.1-37 6.1.4.2 Land Use and Denographic Surveys 6.1-38 6.1.4.2.1 Distribution of the 1980 Population 6.1-38a 10 6.1.4.2.2 Population Projections 6.1-38b 10 6.1.4.3 Ecological Monitoring 6.1-39 O

15a

AMENDMENT IV October 1975 g '

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 7.1.1 Computational Models 7.1-2 7.1.1.1 Meteorology 7.1-2 7.1.1.2 Dose Calculational Methodology 7.1-2 -

7.1.1.3 Sodium Fire Analysis 7.1-7 7.1.2 Accident Analyses 7.1-7 7.1.2.1 Accident 1.0 - Trivial Incidents 7.1-7 7.1.2.2 Accident 2.0 - Small Releases Outside Containment 7.1-7 7.1.2.2.1 Accident 2.1 - Tritium Release Through Steam 7.1-8 Dump Valve 7.1.2.2.2 Accident 2.2 - Condensate Storage Tank Leak 7.1-9 7.1.2.3 Accident 3.0 - Radwaste System Failures 7.1-9 7.1. 2. 3.1 Accident 3.1 - Liquid System Tank Malfunction 7.1-10 7.1.2.3.2 Accident 3.2 - Liquid System Tank Failure 7.1-12 gs 7.1.2.3.3 Accident 3.3 - Rupture of RAPS Surge and Delay 7.1-12 Tank 7.1.2.3.4 Accident 3.4 - Rupture of Cover Gas Equilization 7.1-16 Line 4 7.1.2.4 Accident 4.0 - Sodium Fires During Maintenance 7.1-16a 7.1.2.4.1 Accident 4.1 - Failure of Ex-Containment Primary 7.1-17 Sodium Drain Piping During Maintenance 7.1.2.4.2 Accident 4.2 - Failure of the Ex-Vessel Storage 7.1-19 Tank (EVST) Sodium Cooling System During Main tenance Accident 5.0 - Fission Products to Primary and 7.1-21 7.1.2.5 Secondary Systems 7.1.2.5.1 Accident 5.1 - Of f-Design Transients That Induce 7.1-22 Fuel Failures Above Those Expected 7.1.2.5.2 Accident 5.2 - Steam Generator Tube Rupture 7.1-24 7.1.2.6 Accident 6.0 - Refueling Accidents 7.1-27 7.1.2.6.1 Accident 6.1 - Spent Fuel Cladding Failure in 7.1-28 the EVTM - One Percent Noble Gas and Iodine Release O

g 7.1.2.6.2 Accident 6.2 - Spent Fuel Cladding Failure in 7.1-31 the EVTM - 100 Percent Noble Gas and Iodine Release 17

AMENIEEh'T X Decerber 1981 TABLE OF CENTEITIS 7.1.2.6.3 Accident 6.3 - Inadvertent Opening of a 7.1-31 Floor Valve While a Reactor Port Plug is Renoved 7.1.2.7 Accident 7.0 - Spent Fuel Handling 7.1-32 Accidents 7.1.2.7.1 Accident 7.1 - Spent Fuel Shipping 7.1-33 Cask Drop 7.1.2.8 Accident 8.0 - Accident Initiation 7.1-34 Events Considered in Design Basis Evaluation in the Safety Analysis Report 7.1.2.8.1 Accident 8.1 - Primary Sodium In-Cm- 7.1-34 tainment Drain Tank Failure During Maintenance 7.1.2.8.2 Accident 8.2 - Iarge Primary Coolant 7.1-36 Sodium Spill During Operation 7.1.2.8.3 Accident 8.3 - Gross Failure of Ex-Con- 7.1-2i!

tairunent Primary fodium Storage Tank 7.1.2.8.4 Accident 8.4 - Rupture of the Ex-Vessel 7.1-40 Storage Tank Sodium Cooling Syst m During Operation 7.1.2.8.5 Accident 8.5 - Iarge Steam Line Break 7.1-42 7.1.3 Summary of Plant Acx:ident Doses 7.1-43 7.2 Other Accidents 7.2-1 7.2.1 Fires and Explosions 7.2-1 7.2.1.1 Sodium Fires - Non-Radiological Effects 7.2-3 VOLUME III 8.0 ECCNOMIC & SOCIAL EFFECTS OF PLANT 8.1-1 CCESIRUCTION AND OPERATION 8.1 Econmic & Social Conditions of Site Area 8.1-1 8.1.1 Social-Geographic Canditions of Area 8.1-2 6 10 l 8.1.1.1 Spatial Relationships Between Project Work 8.1-2 l Sites, Study Area Counties and Municipalities i 18 L

O IM2nD7r X Decmber 1981 TABLE OF CQH12MS 8.1.1.2 Accessibility Between Project Work Sites, 8.1-3 Study Area Counties and Municipalities 8.1.2 Social-Dmographic Ccnditions of Area 8.1-4 6 10 8.1.2.1 Population Size and Distribution 8.1-4 8.1.2.2 Population Cmposition 8.1-4 1

8.1.2.2.1 Age 8.1-4 8.1.2.2.2 Employment, Occupation and Income 8.1-5 8.1.3 Social-Econcaic Ccnditions of Area 8.1-6 8.1.3.1 Housing Situation 8.1-6 8.1.3.1.1 Single-Family Detached and Condcminiums 8.1-8 8.1.3.1.2 Multi-Family Dwellings 8.1-10 8.1.3.1.3 Mobile Hate Site 8.1-12 8.1.3.2 School Systems 8.1-13 8.1.3.3 Water and Wastewater Systm 8.1-14 8.1.3.3.1 Water Syst es 8.1-15 8.1.3 . 3 . 2 Wastewater Syst es 8.1-17 8.1.3.3.3 Solid Waste Disposal 8.1-19 8.1.3.4 Health Care 8.1-19 8.1.3.5 Public Safety 8.1-20 8.1.3.5.1 Law Enforcement 8.1-20 8.1.3.5.2 Fire Protection 8.1-20 8.1.3.6 Recreation 8.1-21 8.1.3.7 Sumnary 8.1-21 8.2 Anticipated Economic and Social Benefits 8.2-1 8.2.1 Primary Benefits 8.2-1 18a

O I

)

l 9'

\

IrlTEt1TIOilALLY BLAT 4K

\

O

AME20 MENT X Decerber 1981 TABLE OF CCNTENIS 8.2.2 Secondary Benefits 8.2-2 4

8.2.2.1 Direct Employment and Income 8.2-3 8.2.2.2 Induced Employment and Inc me 8.2-3 8.2.2.3 Taxes and Other Revenues 8.2-5 8.3 Anticipated Economic and Social Costs B.3-1 8.3.1 Internal Costs 8.3-1 6 10 8.3.2 External Costs 8.3-2 8.3.2.1 Costs of Short-Term Duration 8.3-2 8.3.2.1.1 Housing Situation Impacts 8.3-4 8.3.2.1.2 School Syst s Impacts 8.3-5 8.3 . 2.1.3 Transportation Impacts 8.3-6 8.3.2.1.4 Fiscal Impacts 8.3-7 8.3 . 2.1.5 Other Project Impacts 8.3-8 i

8.3.2.2 Costs of Long-Term Duration 8.3-9 8.3.2.3 Summary of External C6sts 8.3-10 9.0 ALTERNATIVE APPROPOIES AND SITES 9.1 Alternative Amroaches 9.1-1 9.2 Alternative Sites and Plant Arrangements 9.2-1 9.2.1 Site Selection Criteria 9.2-2 9.2.2 Selection of Candidate Site (s) - 9.2-3 Hook-On Arrangements 9.2.3 Technical Evaluations of Alternative 9.2-6 Hook-On Arrangments 19

O TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 9.2.3.1 Reheat Selection Alternative for John Sevier 9.2-6 9.2.3.2 Combined Cycle Power Plant 9.2-7 9.2.4 Selection of Candidate Site (s) - New 9.2-8 9.2.5 Candidate Sites Studies 9.2-9 9.2.5.1 John Sevier 9.2-9 9.2.5.1.1 Site Location 9.2-9 9.2.5.1.2 Access 9.2-9 9.2.5.i.3 Population 9.2-9 9.2.5.1.4 Geology 9.2-10 9.2.5.1.5 Seismology 9.2-11 9.2.5.1.6 Hydrology 9.2-11 9.2.5.1.7 Flood Features 9.2-12 9.2.5.1.8 Meteorology 9.2-13 9.2.5.1.9 Land and Land Use 9.2-13 9.2.5.1.10 Ecology 9.2-14 9.2.5.1.11 Public Water Supplies 9.2-14 9.2.5.1.12 Historic Sites 9.2-15 9.2.5.2 Widows Creek 9.2-15 9.2.5.2.1 Site Location 9.2-15 9.2.5.2.2 Access 9.2-15 9.2.5.2.3 Population 9.2-15 9.2.5.2.4 Geology 9.2-16 9.2.5.2.5 Seismology 9.2-17 9.2.5.2.6 Hydrology 9.2-17 9.2.5.2.7 Flood Elevation 9.2-18 9.2.5.2.8 Meteorology 9.2-18 9.2.5.2.9 Land and Land Use 9.2-19 9.2.5.2.10 Ecology 9.2-19 9.2.5.2.11 Public Water Supplies 9.2-20 9.2.5.2.12 distoric Sites 9.2-20 20

AMENDMENT X Decenber 1981 LIST OF TABLEE VOLUME I Table No. and Title Page 1.0 OIDECTIVE OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY 1.3-1 Prototypicality of CRBRP Systers and Caponents for 1.3-16 Comercial Plant A@lication 1.3-2 Principal Design Parameter Comparison, CRBRP and 1.3-18 D1FBR Corsercial Plant 2.0 THE SITE

2.2-1 Population of Cities and Towns Within 50 Miles of the 2.2-14 CRBRP Site; 1970 and 1980 2.2-2A 1980 Resident Population Distribution 0 to 10 Miles from 2.2-15 the CRBRP Site 2.2-2B 1990 Resident Population Distribution 0 to 10 Miles from 2.2-16 the CRERP Site 2.2-2C 2000 Resident Population Distribution 0 to 10 Miles from 2.2-17 the CRBRP Site 10 2.2-2D 2010 Resident Population Distribution 0 to 10 Miles from 2.2-18 the CRBRP Site 2.2-2E 2020 Resident Population Distribution 0 to 10 Miles from 2.2-19 l the CRBRP Site 2.2-2F 2030 Resident Population Distribution 0 to 10 Miles from 2.2-20 the CRBRP Site 2.2-3A 1980 Resident Population Distribution 10 to 50 Miles from 2.2-21 the CRBRP Site 2.2-3B 1990 Resident Population Distribution 10 to 50 Miles from 2.2-22 the CRBRP Site i

31

AMENDMENT X Dec eber 1981 O

LIST OF TABLES Table No. and Title Page 2.2-3C 2000 Resident Population Distribution 10 to 50 Miles from 2.2-23 the CRBRP Site 2.2-3D 2010 Resident Population Distribution 10 to 50 Miles from 2.2-24 the CRBRP Site l

2.2-3E 2020 Resident Population Distribution 10 to 50 Miles from 2.2-25 the CRBRP Site 2.2-3F 2030 Resident Population Distribution 10 to 50 Miles from 2.2-26 the CRBRP Site i 2.2-4 Estimates of Traffic Volume for Highways in Vicinity of 2.2-27 the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant,1980 2.2-5 Resident Equivalent Population for Transportation 2.2-28 i

Transients Within 5 Miles of the CRBRP Site 2.2-6 Employment and Resident Equivalmt at the ORGDP, ORNL, 2.2-29 O

and Y-12 Facilities (1981) i 2.2-7 Sector Distribution of Daily Transients Associated With 2.2-30 ;

the Oak Ridge Ccraplex 2.2-8 Estimated Average Peak Hour Use at Recreation Areas Within 2.2-31 10 Miles of the CRBRP Site,1980 to 2030 2.2-9 Resident Equivalents for Recreation Areas Within 10 Miles 2.2-34 ,

of the CRBRP Site, 1980 to 2030 10 1

' 2.2-10 Cumulative Population Density for Area Within 30 Miles of 2.2-36 of the CRBRP Site, 1980 through 2030 2.2-11 School Population Within a 10-Mile Radius of the CRBRP 2.2-37 Site 1

2.2-12 Hospitals Within 50 Miles of the CRBRP Site 2.2-39 l 2.2-13 Traffic Locked Through Melton Hill Dam 2.2-40 2.2-14 Public Water Supplies Within a 20-Mile Radius of the 2.2-41 CRBRP Site for 1981 2.2-15 Industrial Water Supplies Within a 20-Mile Radius of 2.2-44 l

l the CRBRP Site 1

31A L

AMEt@ MENT X Decent >er 1981 LIST OF TABLES Table No. and Title Page 2.3-1 Distribution of Burials by Mound Construction Stage 2.3-12 8 at 40RE124 2.4-1 Stratigraphic Units - Vicinity of the CRBRP Site 2.4-17 2.4-2 Radiometric Age Determinations 2.4-19 2.4-3 Preliminary Tabulations - Compressional and Shear 2.4-20 Wave Velocities and Elastic Module Calculations at the CRBRP Site 2.5-1 Clinch River Stream Gage Locations, 1936-1968 2.5-21 2.5-2 Periods of Zero Release from Melton Hill Dam 2.5-22 May 1963 - October 1972 2.5-3 Average Monthly Turbine and Gate Discharges in 2.5-23 Day-Second-Feet, Melton Hill Dam t

32

m_

O 1

i l

1 INTENTIONALLY BLAtlK I

I l

l O

x.)

LIST OF TABLES Table No, and Title Page 2.8-16 Concentrations of I-131 and Sr-90 in Milk for Second 2.8-30 Half 1972, Inraediate Environs 2.8-17 Concentrations of I-131 and Sr-90 in Milk for 1972, 2.8-31 Remote Environs 2.8-18 Concentrations of Radionuclides in Milk for the 2.8-32 Twelve Month Periods Ending December 1971 and December 1972 2.8-19 Background Radiation in East Tennessee Area--1971 2.8-33 2.8-20 Average Gamma Count Rate at the Surface of Clinch 2.8-34 River Silt 2.8-21 Average Gamma Count Rate at the Surface of Tennessee 2.8-35 River Silt 2.8-22 Estimated Average Annual Genetically Significant 2.8-36 Dose to the Population in Eastern Tennessee, 1972 3.0 THE PLANT 3.2-1 Principal Plant Characteristics 3.2-5 3.2-2 Principal Reactor Parameters 3.2-6 3.3-1 Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Water Usage - 3.3-5 Maximum Power 3.3-2 Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Water Usage - 3.3-6 Minimum Power 3.3-3 Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Water Usage - 3.3-7 Temporary Shutdown 3.3-4 CRBRP Water Usage Seasonal Variation 3.3-8 3.4-1 Design Parameters and Conditions 3.4-5 3.4-2 Component Description 3.4-6 53

AMEND. X DEC. 1961 LIST OF TABLES Table No. and Title Page 3.4-3 Estiamted Wet Bulb Temperatures Based on Readily 3.4-7 Available Dry Bulb Temperatures and Relative Hemidities at Knoxville, Tennessee 3.4-4 Water Temperatures fo the Clinch River and the 3.4-8 Cooling Tower Blowdown 3.5-1 Estimated Annual Concentration of Low and Intermediate 3.5-20 Activity Level Input Streams 3.5-2 Expected Activity Inventory Stored After Processing 3.5-22 3.5-3 Concentration of Radionuclides at Discharge to 3.5- 24 Clinch River: Expected Values 3.5-4 Raps Performance Summary Data 3.5-26 f9 3.5-5 CAPS Performance Summary Data 3.5- 27 3.5-6 Production Rates of Radionuclines 3.5- 28 10 3.5-7 Radionuclide Release Rates and Release Paths for 3.5-30 the 0.1% Failed Fuel l9 3.5-8 Annual Release Rates -for the 0.1% Failed Fuel Service 3.5-31 Condition 3.5-9 BOP Gaseous Tritium Release 3.5-32 3.5-10 Estimates of Solid Radwaste Shipment Per Year in Terms 3.5-33 9 of Annual Quantities 3.5-11 Solid Radwaste Shipments Per Year 3.5-34 3.6-1 Preliminary Estimates of Effluent Water concentration 3.6-6 3.7-1 Sewage Disposal System Estimated Effluent 3.7-4 g Characteristics 3.7-2 Exhaust Effluents from Plant Diesel Operation 3.7-5 3.9-1 Community Types of the Proposed Transmission Line 3.9-13 Route of the CRBRP Site Area O

54

AMENDl1ENT VIII February 1977 g

b LIST OF TABLES Table No. and Title 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF ACCIDENTS 7.1-1 Atmospheric Dilution Factors - 50 Percent Probability 7.1-44 x/Q Values 7.1-1A Ratios of 50 Percentile x/Q Values From Table 7.1-1 to 7.1-45 the 50 Percentile x/Q Values from Table 2.6-38A 7.1-2 Average Energy Per Disintegration 7.1-46 7.1-3 Inhalation Dose Conversion Factor, F 7.1-48 4

7.1-4 Population Distribution and Wind Frequency for the 7.1-50 ENE and NNW Sectors c 7.1-5 Sunmary of Potential Doses From Plant Accidents 7.1-51

( Minimum Exclusion Distance - 2,200 Feet 7.1-6 Summary of Potential Doses From Plant Accidents 7.1-52 Downwind Distance - 0.6 Mile 7.1-7 Summary of Potential Doses From Plant Accidents 7.1-53 8

Downwind Distance - 1 Mile 7.1-8 Summary of Potential Doses From Plant Accidents 7.1-54 Downwind Distance - 2.5 fiiles 7.1-9 Summary of Potential Doses From Plant Accidents 7.1-55 Downwind Distance - 4 Mile 7.1-10 Summary of Potential Doses From Plant Accidents 7.1-56 Downwind Distance - 7 Miles 7.1-11 Summary of Potential Doses From Plant Accidents 7.1-57 Downwind Distance - 21 Miles 7.1-12 Sumary of Potential Doses From Plant Accidents 7.1-58 Downwind Distance - 50 Miles 7.1-13 Summary of Potential Whole Body Population Doses 7.1-59 From Plant Accidents

("

h 7.1-14 Release of Radioactivity From the RAPS Surge Tank Cell to RSB Following RAPS Surge Tank Rupture 7.1-60 7.1-15 Cleanup or Radioactive Gas From RAPS Surge Tank 7.1-61 Cell Following RAPS Surge Tank Rupture 58

AMENDMFNT X Decerber 1981 O

LIST OF TABLES Table No and Title Page 7.1-16 Cleanup of Radimetive Reactor Cover Gas in CAPS 7.1-62 Following RAPS Surge Tank Rupture 7.1-17 Radioactivity Release Following Postulated Cover Gas 7.1-63 Equalization Line Rupture (Curies) 7.1-18 Radioactive Content of Primary Sodium Coolant 7.1-64 7.1-19 Radioactive Content of EVST Sodium 7.1-66 7.1-20 Fuel Assembly Noble Gas and Iodine Inventories 87 Hours 7.1-67 After Shutdown 7.1-21 EVIM Gas Activity 87 Hours After Shutdown 7.1-68 7.1-22 Initial Leakage Rate Through EVIM Seals to RCB/RSB 7.1-69 Atmosphere 87 Hours After Shutdown 7.1-23 Reactor Cover Gas Inventory 30 Hours After Shutdown 7.1-70 7.2-1 BOP Chemical Storage Tanks 7.2-6 7.2-2 Estimated Sodium Hydroxide Releases for Most Limiting 7.2-7 8 l Potential Fire Accidents l

\

VOLUME III 8.0 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS OF PLANT CONSIRUCTION AND OPERATION 8.1-1 Counties and Municipalities Constituting Area of Study 8.1-22 8.1-2 Agroximate Road Mileages Between the CRBRP Site and 8.1-23 Surrounding Municipalities 6 10 8.1-3 Actual and Projected Population for Area Counties, Urban 8.1-24 Areas, and Rural Areas, 1980-2030 8.1-4 Age Distribution of Anderson, Knox, Loudon, and Roane 8.1-25 Counties; 1980 and 1990 0

59

MIDDENI X December 1981 LIf7f OF TABLES Table No. and Title Fage 8.1-5 Employment, Nunter and Percentage by Occupation,1978 8.1-26 8.1-6 Dnployment, Number and Percentage by Industry, 1977 8.1-27 8.1-7 Geographic Distribution of DOE Plants by Percent of 8.1-28 Total Plant Employment 8.1-8 Total Personal Income and Per Capita Income - 1978 8.1-29 -

8.1-9 Geographic Distribution of DOF/ Contractor Payroll 8.1-30 (October 1980) 8.1-10A Housing Units Added to Existing Housing Stock by County 8.1-31 and Municipality in Anderson County from 1974-1979 8 .1-10B Housing Units Added to Existing Housing Stock by County 8.1-32 O 8.1-10C Housing Units Added to Existing Housing Stock by County and Muncipality in Knox County from 1974-1979 8.1-33 6 10 and Muncipality in Loudon County from 1974-1979 8.1-10D Housing Units Added to Existing Housing Stock by County 8.1-34 and Muncipality in Roane County frm 1974-1979 8.1-11 Estimated Number and Percent of Housing Units by Type 8.1-35 for 1970 and 1980, and Units Added by Type Between 1970 and 1980 8.1-12 Housing: Ntmber, Vacancy Rates, and Range of Rents of 8.1-36 Apartments in Western Part of Knox County by Apartment Complex - January 1981 8.1-13 Growth of Mobile Home use in Anderson, Knox, Loudon, and 8.1-38

Roane Counties from 1960 to 1980 8.1-14 Distribution of Mobile Hmes in Anderson, Knox, Ioudon, 8.1-39 and Roane Counties in 1980 8.1-15 School Systems: Capacity and Enrolhpent of Area Schools 8.1-40 l

by System and Grade: 1980-1981 School Year l 8.1-41 8.1-16 Water Systems: Source, Treatment Capacity and Consumption of Water Supply in Area of Municipality - 1981 l

59A

AMENDMENT X Decater 1981 O

LIST OF TABLES Table No. and Title Page 8.1-17 Waste-Water Systems: Type, Treatment Capacity and Usage 8.1-42 of Waste-Water Treatment in Area by Municipality - 1981 8.1-18 Health Care: Number and Location of Short Term Hospitals 8.1-43 in Area - 1981 8.1-19 Public Safety: ? Amber and Location of Law Enforcenent 8.1-44 Officers and Firemen in Area - 1981 8.1-20 Existing Ccrrunity Recreation Facilities / Programs in the 8.1-45 CRBRP Area 8.2-1 New Employment: Schedule of Direct &ploymmt for the 8.2-7 CRBRP Project by Type of Employment ,

8.2-2 Income: Schedule of Direct &ployment Income for the 8.2-8 Construction and Operation Phases of the CRBRP Project by Type of Employee 8.2-3 New &ployment: Estimated Schedule of Indirect hployment 8.2-9 for the CRERP Project 6 10 8.2-4 New Income: Estimated Schedule of Indirect Employment 8.2-10 Income for the CRERP Proj %t 8.2-5 Selected Revenues Resulting from Peak Population Influx 8.2-11 During Construction l 8.3-1 CRERP Total Plant Cost Estimates 8.3-13 8.3-2 CRBRP Estimated Population Effects Peak Years of 8.3-16 Construction l 8.3-3 Estimted Nuder and Location of Relocated CRERP Project 8.3-17

&ployees, Spouses, and Children at Peak of Construction l

Activity 8.3-4 New Residences: Estimted Place and Type of Residence of 8.3-18 I Relocated CRBRP Project &ployees at Peak of Construction Activity l

8.3-5 New Students: Total of Estimated Nu2er of School 8.3-19 Enrollments for Children of Relocated CRBRP Eriployees at Peak Construction Activity by School Systen and Grade Level l

59B

. . .- - -.- = . - _ . _ - - .

O AMDEMENT X December 1981 1

LIST OF TABLEE 1

, Table No. and Title Page 8.3-6 CRBRP Site Traffic Analysis 8.3-20 i 6 10 8.3-7 CRBRP Connuter Traffic Impact on Key Highway Segments 8.3-21 l

9.0 ALTERNATIVE APPRCACHES AtO SITES

, 9.1-1 Costs and Uranium and Separative Work Requirements With 9.1-3 and Without a Breeder 9.2-1 WA Steam Plant Characteristics for Demonstration Plant 9.2-35 !

Siting Adaptability I i

O 1

F t

i O

. 60

O LIST OF TABLES Table No. and Title Page 9.2-2 Site Data for Candidate Sites - New 9.2-36 9.2-3 A Summary of Comparisons Between the John Sevier, 9.2-39 Widows Creek and Clinch River Sites 9.2-4 Principal Plant Parameters for the Demonstration 9.2-44 Plant Alternatives 9.2-5 Summary of Economic Comparison of Differential 9.2-45 '

Costs of Alternatives to the Clinch River Breeder Reactor 9.2-6 Intangible Considerations 9.2-46 10.0 PLANT DESIGN ALTERNATIVES 10.0-1 General Outline for Section 10.0 10.0-3 10.1-1 Design Conditions for the Cooling System 10.1-22 Alternatives 10.1-2 Ground Fog Potential for Cooling Tower Alternatives 10.1-23 10.1-3 Ground Fog for Three Points of Interest in the CRBRP 10.1-24 Site Vicinity 10.1-4 Drift Deposition for Cooling Tower Alternati u s 10.1-25 10.1-5 Land Requirements for Alternative Cooling Systems 10.1-26 10.1-6 Visual Impact of Natural Draf t Wet Cooling Tower 10.1-27 Compared to Reactor Dome 10.1-7 Effects of Alternative Cooling Systems on Plant 10.1-28 Power Production 10.1-8 Economic Factors 10.1-29 10.1-9 Economic Costs for the Cooling System Alternatives 10.1-30 10.1-10 Summary of Environmental and Economic Costs for 10.1-31 the Alternative Cooling Systems 61

AMENDMENT I May 15, 1975 J

LIST OF FIGURES VOLUME I Figure No. and Title Page 1.0 OBJECTIVE OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY 1.2-1 Compound System Doubling Time vs Breeding Ratio for 1.2-9 CRBRP and Advanced LMFBR's 1.2-2 Comparative Heat Rejection Potential From Various 1.2-11 Generating Plant Systems 1.2-3 Relative Land Area Disturbed by Energy Fuel 1.2-12 Production - 1,000 Megawatt Plant 1.2-4 Occupational Man-Days Lost per Megawatt-Year Net 1.2-13 Output Over Lifetime of System g~g

)

1.3-1 LMFBRs - U. S. and World Wide 1.3-20 1.4-1 Comparison of U30 8 Supply Capability and Demand 1.4-4 Using the Current Light-Water Reactor on the Once-Through Fuel Cycle 2.0 THE SITE 2.1-1 Location of Clinch River Site in Relation to Counties 2.1-4 and State 2.1-2 Location of Site With Respect to Urban Centers, Rail- 2.1-5 roads and Highways Within a 10-Mile Radius of the Site 2.1-3 Site Location 2.1-6 2.1-4 Arrangement of Plant Structures 2.1-7 r,

Q, 2.1-5 Topography of the CRBRP Site 2.1-8 2.1-6 Aerial View of Clinch River Site 2.1-9 65

AMENDMDR X Deceber 1981 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. and Title Page 2.1-7 Farms, Dwellings, Industries and Wooded 2.1-10 Areas Within 2-Mile Radius of the Site 2.2-1 Approximate Center of Peninsula for 2.2-45 Demographic Analysis 2.2-2 Study Area Within 10 Miles of the Clinch 2.2-46 River Breeder Reactor Site 2.2-3 DOE / Oak Ridge Laboratory Ccuplex Boundary 2.2-47 Relative to CRPRP Site 2.2-4 Urban Areas Within 10 Miles of the CRBRP 2.2-48 Site 2.2-5 Circle and Sector Figure and Study Area 2.2-49 Within 50-Miles of the CRBRP Site 2.2-6 Recreational Areas Within 10-Mile Radius 2.2-50 of the CRBRP Site 10 2.2-7A 1980 Resident and Transient Pcpulation 2.2-51 Distribution, O to 10 Miles 2.2-7B 1990 Resident and Transient Population 2.2-52 Distribution, O to 10 Miles i

2.2-7C 2000 Resident and Transient Population 2.2-53 i Distribution, O to 10 Miles 2.2-7D 2010 Resident and Transient Population 2.2-54 Distribution, O to 10 Miles 2.2-7E 2020 Resident and Transient Populat. ion 2.2-55 Distribution, O to 10 Miles 2.2-7F 2030 Resident and Transient Population 2.2-56 Distribution, O to 10 Miles 2.2-8A 1980 Resident Population Distribution, 2.2-57 10 to 50 Miles 2.2-8B 1990 Resident Population Distribution, 2.2-58 10 to 50 Miles 66

O AMDEMENT X Decerber 1981 LIST OF FIGURES i

Figure No. and Title Page 2.2-8C 2000 Resident Population Distribution, 2.2-59 10 to 50 Miles 2.2-8D 2010 Resident Population Distribution, 2.2-60 10 to 50 Miles 2.2-8E 2020 Resident Population Distribution, 2.2-61 10 to 50 Miles 2.2-8F 2030 Resident Population Distribution, 2.2-62 10 to 50 Miles 2.2-9 Schools Within 10-Mile Radius of the 2.2-63 GBRP Site 10 2.2-10 Industrial Plants Within 10-Mile Radius 2.2-64 of the CRBRP Site 2.2-11 CRBRP Site Major Highways 2.2-65 2.2-12 Public Water Supplies Within 10-Mile 2.2-66 Radius of the CRBRP Site 2.2-13 Industrial Water Supplies Within 10-Mile 2.2-67 Radius of CRBRP Site l

{

O

_ _ _ e e. __ _ -. .

i s -

y-- _

l l

l -

4 s .

A 1

l 1

\ \

i .,

s .:

1

.s ,

s

\

If1TErlTIONALLY BLAtlK ,

a l

1 A

3 l i

4 f

4 i

1 x AMEND. X DEC. 1981 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. and Title Page

\ 3.5-1 Liquid Radwaste System Flow Diagram 3.5-35 3.5-2 Schematic Diagram of the Rapt-Recycle Argon 3.5-36 3.5-3 Schematic Diagram of Caps 3.5-37 10

. 3.5-4 Radioactive Gas Flow Paths 3.5-38 3

3.5 Solid Radwaste System Flow Diagram 3.5-39 i 3.6-1 Chemical and Biocide Additions and Discharges 3.6-7 3.7-1 Construction Sanitary Waste System Schematic 3.7-6 9 3.7-2 Permanent Sanitary Waste System Schematic 3.7-7 N

3. 8 l g , Clinch River Breeder Reactor Core Layout 3.8-10

' 3 '. 8;2 Fuel Rod 3.8-11 f9

. 9- Proposed Transmission Line Route of the CRBRP Site Area 3.9-14 3.9-2 Existing Access Roads of the CRBRP Site Area 3.9-15 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF SITE PREPARATION, PLANT AND iTRANSMISSION FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION 4.1-1 SiteiLecation 4.1-23 4.,1-2 Arranqement of Plant Structures 4.1-24 9 4.1-3 , ore.liminary Site Construction Plan 4.1-25 4.2-1 IoilErodibilityoftheCRBRPArea 4.2-10

'4.2-2 Neavy Equipment Impact Potential of the CRBRP Area 4.2-11 4.2-3 Revegetation Potential of the CRBRP Area 4.2-12 5.0 ENVIR,ONMENTAL ~

EFFECTS OF PLANT OPERATION 5.1-1 , Typical Case-Winter 5.1-56 9 1 ;

O t

72

l t i l

l

! O.

I l

l O

INTENTIONALLY BLANK O

!l AMENDMEhT X Decetber 1981 i

LIST OF FIGURES l Figure No. and Title Page

. 6.1-6 Sampling Locations for Macrophytes. 6.1-59 9 Sampling Was Dme Approximately 200 Feet Both Up and Downstream to the

Transects Indicated for the Baseline Monitoring Program e

6.1-7 Sampling Stations for Fish Populations and 6.1-60 Fish Food Preference for the Baseline

( Monitoring Program s

F 6.1-8 Location of Sampling Stations for the 6.1-61

Collection of Fish Eggs and Larvae for

the Baseline Monitoring Program e

[ 6.1-9 Sampling Location for Physical and Chemical 6.1-62 Additional Analyses for the Baseline E Monitcring Program

. 6.1-9a Sampling Location for Water Quality and Aquatic 6.1-62a

! Biological Monitoring, Clinch River Breeder Reactor

[ Plant, Preconstruction-Construction Phase (1975-1977)

I i 6.1-9b Clinch River Sampling Station for Site Stormwater 6.1-62b 9 Runoff, CRBRP - 1975

! 6.1-9c Peripheral Sampling Stations for Site Stormwater 6.1-62c L Runoff-CRERP, - (1976-1978) e p

6.1-10 location of Groundwater Observation Wells, CRERP 6.1-63 (1976-1977) r

[ 6.1-11 Reservoir Environmental Radiation 6.1-64 6

) Monitoring Network, Preconstruction-Construction Phase 6.1-12 Meteorological Facility Locator Chart 6.1-65 8 l 6.2-1 Atmospheric and Terrestrial Monitoring 6.2-24 l

Network for CRERP 4 8 l 6.2-2 Reservoir Monitoring Network 6.2-25 h

O i

a 74 m

NE2aEhi X Decerter 1981 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. and Title Page VOLUME III 8.0 DOCIOMIC AND K)CIAL mu;m OF PLANT OCNSTRUCTION f AND OPERATION 8.1-1 Area Counties and Municipal Boundaries 8.1-46 {10 0.1-2 Diagram Depicting Spatial Relationships 8.1-47 Between CRERP Site and Surrounding ,

Municipalities l

8.1-3 Existing and Potential Mobile Hce Sites 8.1-48 l in Area 8.3-1 Principal Highway Network Surrounding CRBRP 8.3-22 Site l

9.0 ALTERNATIVE APPIGCHES MO SITES 9.1-1 Year of Depletion for Tatural Occurring 9.1-4 Fossil Fuel Sources vs Projected Energy Consunption Rates 9.2-1 'IVA Candidate Plants for a Hook-On 9.2-48 Arrangement 9.2-2 John Sevier Site 9.2-49 9.2-3 Widows Creek Site 9.2-50 9.2-4 Clinch River Site 9.2-51 0

74a i

AMEN 0 MENT X Decetber 1981 LIST CF FIGURES Figure No. and Title Page 10.0 PLANT DESIGN ALTERNATIVES 10.1.1 The Mechanical Draft Wet / Dry Cooling Tower 10.1-32 10.1-2 Flow Conditions in Clinch River 10.1-33

, 10.1-3 Exhaust Cmditions for the Natural Draft 10.1-34 10.1-4 Exhaust Ccnditions for the Mechanical 10.1-35 Draft Wet Tower O 10.1-5 Evaporation Rates for the Mechanical Draft Wet Tower 10.1-36 10.1-6 Heller Cycle Dry Cooling Tower 10.1-37 10.1-7 Cold Water Terperature for the Mechanical 10.1-38 Draft Dry Tower 10.1-8 Exhaust Conditions for the Mechanical Draft 10.1-39 Tower 10.1-9 1>efinition of Plume Severity 10.1-40 10.1-10 Blowdown Teuperatures for the Evaporative 10.1-41 Cooling Systen Alternatives 75

1 O O

I!!TENTIONALLY BLAtiK O

Amend. X Dec. 1981 2.2 REGIONAL DEMOGRAPHY, LAND AND WATER USE

2.2.1 POPULATION ' DISTRIBUTION -

The 1980 population distribution within a 50 mile radius of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP) is based on the preliminary results

of the 1980 U.S. Census of Population and aerial photography. The population in an annulus from 5- to 50-miles from the CRBRP is based j upon the 1980 population for Census County Division (CCD's) and incorpo-rated areas. The 1980 population within a 5-mile radius of the CRBRP is based upon structure counts taken from aerial photography (scale 1 inch = 1,000 feet) flown on February 24, 1981. The approximate center of the peninsular portion of the Site was used for demographic analysis, as shown in Figure 2.2-1. The methodology employed for making population projections by decade from 1990 to 2030 and for allocating the population to the circle and sector format is discussed in Section 6.1.4.2.

O 2.2.1.1 RESIDENT POPULATION WITHIN 10 MILES 10 i

The area within a 10 mile radius of the Site includes part of the Oak Ridge Reservation, several small towns, and rural areas as indicated in Figure 2.2-2. The dominant feature within that 10 mile radius is the Oak Ridge Reservation. Approximately one-third of the area within 5 miles of l the CRBRP site is comprised of land owned by the U.S. Government and 1

in the custody of the Department of Energy (DOE) or TVA (including the Clinch River Site), as indicated in Figure 2.2-3. This area includes a portion of the Oak Ridge city limits. However, at least two-thirds of the

- resident population of the City of Oak Ridge is located beyond the 10-mile radius . This situation exists because of the unique way in which the City of Oak Ridge originated. In the 1940's, the government acquired about 80,000 act es for a reservation to be used to develop weapons for World War II. One small part of this parcel of land was set aside for residential O 2.2-1 i

i

Amend. X Dec. 1981 use and became known as the City of Oak Ridge. In the 1950's, the City of Oak Ridge became self-supporting and self-governing.

The remainder of the land was used for government purposes. However, the entire " Oak Ridge Reservation" (80,000 acres) was designated as the City of Oak Ridge. The major remaining portion is in the custody of DOE. Therefore, the portion of the " city" available for residential development is limited because much of the land is reserved for govern-ment use. As a consequence, most of the " City of Oak Ridge" within 10 miles of the CRBRP does not contain resident pol,ulation. There are, however, several large facilities which employ a large work force and these will be discussed in Section 2.2.1.3.

The urban centers within 10 miles of the CRBRP are Harrimar , Lenoir City, Loudon, and Kingston (Figure 2.2-4). Harriman, cut by the 10-mile circumference to the west-northwest, contains 8,257 people. Two smaller towns located slightly closer to the site are Lenoir City, about nine radial miles southeast of the site, with 5,414 people and Kingston, 10 about seven radial miles to the west, with a population of 4,367 in 1980.

As shown in Table 2.2-1, the population of these communities has not changed more than 6 percent between 1970 and 1980.

Results of the analysis of the projected population distribution within 10 miles of the Site are shown in Tables 2.2-2A through 2.2-2F for the years 1980 through 2030. From these projections, it is seen that the population within 10 miles of the Site is expected to grow from its present level of 52,040 persons in 1980 to 67,580 persons in 2030, an increase of 30 percent.

2.2.1.2 RESIDENT POPULATION BETWEEN 10 AND 50 MILES l Most of the area within a 50-mile radius of the Site is within Tennessee; small portions are within North Carolina and Kentucky (Figure 2.2-5).

2.2-2

p Amend. X Dec. 1981 The total 1980 population of the 25 counties located within 50 miles of the O Site was 1,053,569. Population distribution within a 50-mile radius of the CRBRP (excluding county boundaries) for census year 1980 is shown in Table 2.2-3A. Projected resident population distribution within 50 miles for census years 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020, and 2030 are shown in Tables 2.2-3B through 2.2-3F.

Table 2.2-1 presents the population change between 1570 and 1980 for urban centers within 50 miles of the Site. These centers are dominated by Knoxville, a Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). Knoxville's growth is expected to be westward in the vicinity of Interstate 40 and 75 (these highways branch approximately 15 miles west of Knoxville). A triangular area defined by Knoxville, Oak Ridge, and Lenoir City at the triangle's points will likely be the location of growth within the near fu tu re .1 This trend is reflected in the projections in Tables 2.2-3B through 2. 2-3F.

10 In addition to Oak Ridge and Knoxville, two smaller population centers (population of 10,000 to 50,000) are within 50 miles of the Site. They are the Maryville-Alcoa-Eagleton Village area and Athens. The Maryville-Alcoa area is in the 20- to 30-mile range to the east-southeast of the Site and contains 24,276 people. Athens is in the 30- to 40-mile range to the south-southwest with a 1980 population of 12,040.

Numerous small communities and crossroads settlements are scattered throughout the region and are surrounded by low density rural develop-ment. Some of the communities may reach a population of 10,000 or more during the project life, but it is not anticipated that an additional metro-politan center will develop. Knoxville will rem tin the major regional urban area, and should remain the focus of financial and industrial activity within the 50-mile radius of the CRBRP site.

O 2.2-3

Amend. X Dec. 1981 2.2.1.3 TRANSIENT POPULATION Transient population within 10 miles of the Site may be classified into three groups:

e Transportation transients e Daily transients e Seasonal transients Transportation transients are those persons who are using a transportation system and who pass near the Site. These persons are near the Site only a short period of time. Daily transients are those persons who commute to work which is close to the Site. Finally, a seasonal transient populatior, is a population which is present in the study area for only a few months of the year and is primarily related to recreational areas.

The transportation transient population is usually meaningful only for the area near the Site. The further one goes from the Site, the more double 10 counting of the population occurs; that is, local residents are using local highways for errands and trips to work. As a consequence, the only local transportation routes of real significance to the CRBRP are Interstate 40, Tennessee 58 and Tennessee 95. These three roads effectively bracket the CRBRP (Figure 2.2-2). Table 2.2-4 presents the Average Daily Traffic ( ADT) volume for these roads. Table 2.2-5 shows the resident equivalents and the sectors into which they fall. Only about 500 resident equivalents are added to the 0- to 5-mile population.

Many of the vehicles counted probably belong to persons who live within five miles of the Site.2 Therefore, double counting would occur, resulting in a conservative overestimate of resident equivalents.

The major source of daily transients within 10 miles of the Site is the Oak Ridge complex. There are three major industrial facilities; the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant (ORGDP), the Oak Ridge National Laboratory 9

2.2-4

Amend. X Dec. 1981 (ORNL), and the Y-12 plant. Table 2.2-6 shows the employment at these facilities. Each facility operates on a 3 shift per day, '7 days per week, year round. The distribution of the resident equivalents for the Oak Ridge complex is given in Table 2.2-7. By comparing Table 2.2-7 with Table 2.2-2A, it is obvious that these resident equivalents represent either the only population present near the Site (N and NNW sectors) or a number almost as large as the permanent residents (NE sector).

The seasonal transients represents the third type of transients. Such persons are usually visitors to local parks or recreation areas. The amount of visitation to these parks often varies with the time of year, with June, July, and August usually being the months with highest visitation .

Table 2.2-8 presents peak hour visitation3 and visitation projections for recreation areas within 10 miles of the CRBRP. Almost all of these areas will be used for only part of the day. Most visitors at these areas will stay less than four hours because of the short term nature of the activi- 10 ties allowed in the area. Use of peak hour estimates is very conservative, in that actual use of the facilities is over estimated.

Recreational areas within a 10-mile radius of the Site are shown in Figure 2.2-6. Those facilities which handle the largest number of visitors are the Melton Hill Dam Reservation (Site 11), Atomic Speedway (Site 6),

Anchor Dock (Site 26), Kingston Waterfront Park (Site 45), Southwest Point Golf Course (Site 54), and a commercial campground (Site 1). From the nature of these facilities, it can be inferred that most of these recreational sites are used by local residents. Of special interest is the Atomic Speedway, which in 1980 had a peak hour use of 6,000 persons.

This facility, however, is used only one or two days per week for only a part of the year. Table 2.2-9 provides the resident equivalent population for recreational areas within the 10 mile radius of the CRBRP site.

O 2.2-5

Faendo X Dec. 1981 The 0- to 10-mile resident and resident equivalent populations are shown in the population format in Figures 2 2-7A through 2.2-7F. The resident equivalent populations due to the transient population make some rather large additions to the resident population. This is particularly evident within 5-miles of the CRBRP in the following sectors: N, NNE, NE, ENE , E , SE, SSE , W, NNW. Resident equivalent population makes up about 79 percent of the total population within those sectors. The primary reasons are the presence of the X-10 and Y-12 plants to the north and east and highways to the west.

2.2.1.4 POPULATION PROJECTIONS AND POPULATION DENSITY Sections 2.2.1.1 and 2.2.1.2 dealt primarily with the resident population; waever, it is necessary to add the transient population to the resident population to obtain the population distribution around the CRBRP.

Figures 2.2-7A through 2.2-8F present the population by sectors includ-ing transient population, 1980 through 2030, for the area within 50 miles of the CRBRP site. Table 2.2-10 presents the cumulative population 10 density for the area within 30 miles of the plant.

Examination of the figures and Table 2.2-10 shows that:

o The population within 50 miles of the Site will increase by 13 present from 1980 to 2030.

o The maximum cumulative population density within 30 miles of the plant will be 313 persons per square mile.

o The population within 30 miles of the plant will increase by 19 percent from 1980 to 2030.

O 2.2-6

Amend. X Dec. 1981 2.2.1.5 PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INSTITUTIONS Q)

\

G Area school population for years 1971,1981, and 1991 within the 10-mile radius are shown in Table 2.2.11. Twenty-two schools located within a 10-mile radius of the Site, as shown in Figure 2.2-9, have a 1981 total enrollment of 8,870 students. Oak Ridge anticipates building a new elementary school (kindergarten through 6) for their system by 1990.

This school will be located in the western part of Oak Ridge and will accommodate 725 students. However, this school and other new schools to be built in the foreseeable future will replace those presently in use as they become obsolete. Other school systems included within the 10-mile rarlius do not plan to expand beyond that necessary to accommo-date future educational requirements as shown in Tab 1c 2.2.11 as obsolete plants and facilities are retired or renovated.

10 The neareast hospital to the Site is the Harriman City Hospital with 109 beds,4 located about 9.5 miles to the west-northwest. The Loudon

[] County Memorial Hospital, with 50 beds, is located about 10.5 miles to the south-southeast and the Oak Ridge Hospital of the United Methodist Church, with 220 beds, is located about 15 miles to the northeast. A tabulation of additional hospital facilities and their respective capacities within 50 miles of the Site is shown in Table 2.2-12. No new hospitals are planned within the 10-mile radius in the foreseeable future (before 1995).

2.2.2 USES OF ADJACENT LANDS Within a 10-mile radius of the Site, the region encompasses residential, farm, recreational and industrial areas. Land adjoining the Site is zoned for forestry, agriculture, industry or research use; the Site is zoned Industrial 2. No military installations exist in the area. Schools and hospitals, listed in Tables 2.2-11 and 2.2-12, respectively, are the only public facilities located within the 10-mile radius. The Site is served v

2.2-i

Amend. X Dec. 1981 primarily by a highway system and barge transportation. Only one airport (Meadow Lake) is located within the 10-mile radius of the Site.

Industrial and recreational areas are listed in Section 2.2.2.2 and Section 2.2.1.3, respectively. Although the eastern Tennessee area is generally of a rural type with agriculture playing an important part, there are only 4 commercial dairy farms within the 10-mile radius of ORNL. There is no mineral production within the 10-mile radius; however, mineral pro-duction primarily in the form of strip coal mining, does play an important role in the region. No wildlife preserves, sanctuaries or hunting areas are within a 10-mile radius of the Site. A waterfowl refuge which is part of the Long Island Wildlife Management area is located on the Tennessee River approximately eight radial miles southwest of the Site. Part of the Paint Rock Wildlife Management area is also located about eight radial miles southwest of the Site. A third Wildlife Management area is located at Kingston near the steam plant, approximately seven radial miles west of the Site.

2.2.2.1 AGRICULTURE (To be provided) 10 2.2.2.2 INDUSTRY Two large industrial activities are located within five miles of the plant site, as shown in Figure 2.2-10: the Oak P.idge Gaseous Diffusion Plant about three miles north-northwest and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory about four miles cast-northeast.

Enriched uranium is produced at the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant (ORGDP). There are about 5,600 employees at ORGDP. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is a research and development facility which employs approximately 5,100 people. ORNL's work includes reactor and chemical technology, radiation effects, controlled fusion and other basic and applied research activities.

In addition, one small industrial activity is located on a 33 acre parcel of land in the Clinch River Consolidated Industrial Park (CRCIP) about O

2.2-8

Amend. X Dec. 1981 Q

u one and one-half miles north of the center of the plant site and adjacent to the plant site boundary. The industry, Eagle Picher Inc. , fabricates neutron absorbers for power reactors and employs 30 people. The remainder of the industrial park is currently undeveloped.5 Two additional industrial activities located between 5 and 10 miles are DOE's Y-12 facility, nine miles northeast and TVA's Kingston Steam Plant, seven and one-half miles west of the plant Site. The Y-12 facility provides production, research, and development facilities for DOE and employs approximately 6,300 people. About 800 employees work at TVA's Kingston Steam Plant which is a fossil-fired electrical generating plant with a capacity of 1,700,000 kilowatts .

2.2.2.3 MINERALS AND MINING There is no mineral "roduction within the 10-mile radius; however, mineral. production does play an important role in the region, particularly 10 in Morgan, Campbell, and Anderson Counties where the mining and processing of coal has been occurring for years.

2.2.2.4 TRANSPORTATION 2.2.2.4.1 HIGHWAYS One major highway, Interstate 40, passes approximately 1.25 miles south of the plant site as shown in Figure 2.2-11. The closest interchanges on 1-40 are with State Routes 58 and 95, which are about four miles and three miles, respectively, from the plant site location. Existing average daily traffic (in both directions) near the Site is highest for Interstate Route I-40 and equals 21,130 vehicles per day west of the interchange of I-40 and State Route 58. Between this interchange and Oak Ridge, along State Routes 58-95, the average daily traffic count ranges between 7,350 and 9,700. Southward along Route 58 from this interchange to O

2.2-9

Amend. X Dec. 1981 US 70 (Kingston Pike), the average daily count equals 2,450. Along Route 95, between I-40 and the junction of Route 58, the average daily count equals 4,500. Along I-40 east of the interchange of I-40 and Route 95, the average daily traffic count is 20,030 ,6 2.2.2.4.2 RAIL Harriman Junction, approximately 10 miles northwest of the Site, has the closest major main rail line. It is served by both the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific (CNO & TP) and the Southern Railway. A spur line serving the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant (ORGDP) runs adjacer.t to S.R. 58 approximately 2 miles northwest of the Site (Figure 2.2-11).

2.2.2.4.3 WATER 10 The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers operates the locks at Melton Hill Dam and keeps logs of all barge traffic. Total tonnage for barge traffic and total commercial traffic through Melton Hill Dam for the period 1966-1980 is given in Table 2.2-13. Barge traffic passing the CRBRP site at the present time is primarily steel products. None of this traffic contains explosive, toxic, or hazardous materials. There have been no accidents involving barges reported near the CRBRP Site.

2.2.2.4.4 AIR No airports are located near the Site. Airports within 25 miles are as follows :

O 2.2-10

Amend. X Dec. 1981

!,,\ Distance and Direction

's"/ Name Type (miles)

Meadowlake Air Park Sport 10 SW Oak Ridge Air Park Sport 11 NNE Rockwood Municipal Business / Sport 18 W McGhee-Tyson Commercial 24 ESE Powell Business / Sport 24 NE Madisonville Business / Sport 24 S Ferguson Sport 12 S Little Creek Sport 18 E Of the eight, only McGhee-Tyson (Knoxville) has scheduled commercial flights . The center of the nearest flight path, V16, is about 4 miles south of the Site. Commercial aircraft approaching McGhee-Tyson would be at a minimum altitude of 3,500 feet as they pass south of the site.7 10 2.2.3 WATER USE 2.2.3.1 SURFACE WATER USE Twelve public water supplies withdrawing water from surface sources are located within a 20-mile radius of the Site (see Table 2.2-14). Four of these supplies are located where they could be influenced by the plant's waste discharges. The city of Rockwood, Tennessee, has a public water supply intake location on the King Creek embayment of Watts Bar Reser-voir where the potential for reverse flow exists. Under certain conditions, Clinch River water could flow upstream in the Emory River. Such flow could possibly affect the Cumberland Utility District surface water intake and the Harriman water supply intake on the Emory River. Camp John Knox, located about 18 miles from the Site, has an intake located at Tennessee River Mile (TRM) 555.7, about 29 river miles downstream from the Site.

l 2.2-11

faend. X Dec. 1981 Within 50 miles downstream from the plant, two public water supplies can be influenced by water flowing past the CRBRP site. Spring City, which is 30 miles from the Site and had a 1980 population of 1,951, withdraws 120,000 gallons of water per day from the Piney River. Piney River is influenced by backwater from Watts Bar Dam.

Spring City supplements this source with a spring yielding about 200,000 gallons per day. The city of Dayton, 44 miles from the Site, withdraws 1,400,000 gallons of water per day from the Tennessee River. Dayton had a 1980 population of 5,913.

Of the 15 industrial water supplies presently within a 20-mile radius of the Site, five are located where they could be influenced by water borne discharges from the CRBRP. The closest of these is located 1.6 miles downstream from the Site at Clinch River Mile (CRM) 14.4. This supply is used to provide potable water at the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion 10 Plant and the small industrial park at the north end of the Site property.

A DOE supply at CRM 11.5 and TVA's Kingston Steam Plant supply could be influenced by discharges from the Site. Water supply for the Kingston steam plant is withdrawn from the Emory River, which could be influenced by flow coming down the Clinch River during certain periods of the summer. It is used for inplant purposes, including potable uses, as well as cooling.

A. B. Long Quarries, Inc. , and Mead Corporation are both located on the Emory River arm of Watts Bar Reservoir which could receive upstream flow from the Clinch River, but neither of these supplies is used for potable or sanitary purposes. Locations of industrial water supplies are shown in Figure 2.2-13. Identification, distance from the CRBRP site, average daily use, and source of water for industrial water supplies are provided in Table 2.2-15.

O 2.2-12

3 Amend. X

-Dec. 1981-Clinch River water is not known to be.used for irtigation 'in the.

vicinity of the Site. One farm, bordering the river in the -southwest

]

sector, has an auxiliary pumping system to supply water from the river to livestock during periods of low groundwater supply.

l 2.2.3.2 GROUNDWATER USE Most of the development in the area has been rural residential and it

has not been economically feasible to supply public water to every residence. Thus, many individual wells are found in the area. As described in Section 2.5,110 wells and springs are located within two miles of the Site; however, all of these wells are located south of the Clinch River. The Clinch River bounds the Site groundwater system on 10 l three sides and is a groundwater sink for the system. Chestnut Ridge

! appears to represent the northern boundary for the groundwater system of the entire peninsula as can be seen in Figure 2.5-1. Discharge from the aquifer system goes directly into the river or into streams which flow 1

into the river. Because the incised meander of the river is a major topographic feature set down in bedrock, it is unlikely that any groundwater flow could pass beneath the river.8 i

Within a 20-mile radius of the Site, there are 13 public water supplies l

withdrawing water from wells and springs. These are listed in Table 2.2-14 which also includes public water supplies drawn from surface l water. Locations of those within 10 miles of the Site are shown on l Figure 2.2-12.

i i

O 2.2-13

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 2.2-1 POPULATION OF CITIES AND TOWNS WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE CRBRP SITE; 1970 AND 1980 Distance % change Town (miles) Direction 1970 1980 1970-1980 Kingston '

W 4,142 4,367 5 Oak Ridge i NE 28,319 27,552 -3 Lenoir City 9 SE 5,324 5,414 2 Ila rriman 10 WNW 8,734 8,257 -5 Loudon Town 11 SSE 3,728 3,937 6 Oliver Springs 11 NNE 3,405 3,659 8 Rockwood City 16 W 5,259 5,744 9 Clinton 19 NE 4,794 5,239 9 Sweetwater 20 SSW 4,340 4,681 8 10 Norris 28 NE 1,359 1,366 1 Knoxville 22 ENE 174,587 182,249 4 Alcoa-Maryville 25 ESE 21,547 24,276 13 Madisonville 25 S 2,614 2,858 9 LaFollette 35 NNE 6,902 8,054 17 Etowah 40 SSW 3,736 3,682 -1 Athens 33 SSW 11,790 12,040 2 Crossville 37 W 5,381 6,347 18 Jellico 50 NNE 2,235 2,793 25 Gatlinburg 50 ESE 2,329 3,205 38 Dayton 45 SW 4,361 5,169 19 l Source. Tennessee 1980 Census of Population and llousing, Preliminary l Reports. Bureau of the Census, January 1981.

l l

l till l

2.2-14 l

l ,i o* '

=- x O

5P -E~

- 0 1

e ll 0000000000000000 0

- ia 0002362886354313 4 mt 0,4,5,9,4,6,5,4,4,0,1 4,2,7,8,2, 0,

- o ,

0T 1

244342721 1 135411 2 5

0 1 0000000000000000 0 0 0000000000000000 0 4 o

- t 0,4,5,9,3,3,2,0,1 8 7 8,4,4,7,1

, , 6, 0,

- 244342721

- 24411 7 2

.- 5 4 5

. 5 0 2 0 o 0000000000000000 0, 4 t 221 269440642 1 1 31 135 1 2 4, 4 4 N )

O s I E e

. T T l 4 U I i 0 B S m o 0000000000000000 0 2 I ( t 1 449281 41 1 1 6 R P 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 4, T R e 3 2 S B c

. I R n a

D C O A 2

2 N

O I

T E

i i

T i

D t

s 3 t

o 0O00000000000000 5554558807 1 1 0

2 7

0 6

A M 4,

. 2 L O 2 1 U R E P F L O

~ B P S A E 2 T T L N I o 0O00000000000000 0 0 E M t 1 33235387383 9 4 D 1 5 7 I 0 1 S 1

. E R O T

0 1 8 O 9 o 0O0000O000000000 0 0 1 t 1 22 1 22 1 31 5 5 1 1 0

e

- n v

- o i i t .

t a -

c e

NEEEEEEESWWWWWWW l l l NNN SSS SSS NNN a ua

- i r N E E S S W W N t o

mt uo D T CT O

"." U li ;i .iji;li ljjI1I ,j31$)j j;j ]{i ! );ki : 1

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O

O

.-e D

M ~ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O d cc O O O N CC Ch

O N O @ O

M cc E4 m @c@ MM CO O M " N N O N CO N

a a a *

a ma a O a a a a a a a a OH N O in 4 M N O N * - - 4 @ 4 - - N e e m O

- OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O CO O

a e@Q@.

. . . N. CC. O. @. CB C0 CO O. .m 4. N. .M M. m.

NmC4MM C- M in 4 - - M N D ~ D D O

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O N M cc M CO O c N c c 4 N N CO

.J - N**-Mm -* @

O. .

O

~ (C H H D ~

3-) U2 4 M OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O

% % C N sn Ln O M C% ~mme~ M @

H cc a ~ m ~ e* wwm @

ca :::: m O. .

m Z M M M N Q U O CO Z W d N O ::: E

- H v M N H OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O

C E O O N@Q4O@ m cs - Ch N M N A O V +J ~ ~ CC @

a D C4 O W L W C N M J O a CQ L (n VJ l < W d H H 4 Q Z w N W Z Q O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O

- O .a -4MNM@4m54mM in -

En - W @ CO W -

X O i

b i

O Cn O O -

O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O i a -MN -NN -MM @ @

l

< m i O l

o O >

o ,4

-w 4 W C U M MM e ZN zzx W W W:nWcnWro W Cn 3 cn cn cn 3 3 3p:3 h z3 e W

ee DW L Z W W Cn Cn 3 .5 Z

.s O :$ O Q H UH O

l 2.2-16

Amend. X cs Dec. 1981

!\ i t

V o

.-e O

MM COOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O

" M O O O N N ~ N N D N co Q co @ ~N N Ea O - .4. CC. co. @. ~. M. m. M. N. N.00 40 4 5. N. N.

H N@ 04MN-m M M M4@4M M C O.-. - @

O

~ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O N O M M a 4.CQCO.4.N.O.O.m

. m c0 M . .@ . . *@

. CO. N.

N @ m 4 M e-* * - 4m4-H all O m m o @

m OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O M 4 co 4 m - @ O O O 4 e-o ati N a m Nm mm4@ m m

. m.

b o4

- W H H O ~

W m 4 w OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O M L O ~N@@ ~4ON@ N~~ ~ N H x m a ,-e m emmm m m m Cn GC m . CO.

M (* O M N N Q V M w

N O Z W E a N O % v s - H M

.\_/'/ N a

H

< Z 0

U O 0000COOOOOOOOOOO m@@4@@ mom O O

N O

N A O C .h mmN 00 N O M C

W L W a N

J O m CQ % Cn M

< W Q H H A Z N N W Z Q O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O #'

W O 4J m M N M @ 4 C.COtti@ M CC 4 Cn M M @ CC W W C4 O H

I O

O O l C -

I c4 O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O

J -MN M NN -MM @ @

m m O

I C >

O .e M &

a C U Z LLI W f.r.1 W W W W Cn 3 3 3 3 y @ W MM

, o MZ% tn en tn en tn en ic 4 n 2 n w

a Z W W cn cn 3 .s a ea O 2 O Q H UH O

i <

'w/

2.2-17

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O

O

.-e 0

e* em oOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O

4 n O O O N Ch 4 4 ~ CC M Ch CC O N ** ** N Ei a - M Ch Ch c -a ca CCa Ma Na N a m a**a M a c a**a Ch a

e O a a a a a OH NNO4MNM M M ed ed O N 4 m e-* N m e-e e C

- OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O N O e* M Ch Ch 4 N M 4 Ch Ch CC CCa M CCa C - CC Ch a a a a a a a a a a a a a a NNO4MM W ** 4CMM ew N N O - O @

d OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O 4 O CC N O - N * - 4 4 O CC 5 J & NN& ** 4@ m e-e m a a Z 4 N O O

- W Ed E*

D -

CC Cn 4

- OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O Z A O MNN-OONNN-- @ Ch

& x a e-o wm m e* m ee e m m m a =

to Cc

- Cd to M e-* N O U C ee O Z W d N O

= v E

M e En N Ed O

- < Z C O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O M N 4 O U a -NNd'ONOON- O CC D Z C - M M N Ch a 4 N *-*

W 4 "J A O +>

2 % Cn U2

<C W *d H E~ A O Z - N W Z O O Q O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO -

- O => - N M N M N 4 CB CC O O M CC

/

') - ** N CC W e='

CC O H

C

- O O -

N O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O u - 4N ** NN -MM N N m ed C

0 0 >

0 'M ve 4 s1 C f/0 ZWWWWWWWCO3333 M M P"'4 Uj W

ZZZ Z W CO CA Co W CO Cd CG T CA 3

) [4 Z

Z "J

M 3 C E *J

-I O 3 O Cl H UH O

2.2-18 t

y ,". X

. re - g O

0 1

e ll 0000000000000000 0 ia 000444408338281 1 0 mt 1

, 3, 9,1,7,9,8,7,3,2,3,2,6,7,5,0, 8,

- o 0T 285531 1 1 1 1 16731 1 4 1 1 6 0

- 1 0000000000000000 0 0 0000000000000000 0 0

- o 8,

- t 1

,3,9,1 4,5,5,3,9 9 8 5,6,4,4,9 5,

285531 1 1 5631 9 4

~- 5 1 5 6

- 5 0OO0000000000000 0 0 o 4571 01 71 2540 7 0 t 1 221 1 46 1 1

, 3,

- N 4, 2 5 O

I E T T U I )

B S s 4 I e 0OO0000000000000 0 0 R P l o 3771 503731 1 8 3 T R i t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 S B m ,

I R ( 3 1 3 D C e

N E c O

E 2 O H n

- I T a 3 2 T t 0OO0000000000000 0 0

- A M s o 4775670021 9 5 2 L O i t 1 1 1 1 2 9 9, U R D E P F 2 1 L O B P S

- A E

- T T L N I 2 E M

. D o 0OO0000000000000 0 0 I 0 t 283337408503 6 6 S 1 1 1 1 7 9

- E 1

. R O T

0 2 0 0 1 2

- o 0OO000OO00000000 0 0 t 252 1 32 1 31 0 0 2 2 0

e n v

- o i t

. i

- t a c NEEEEEEESWWWWWWW NNN l

a ll ua e NNN SSS SSS i

r N E E S S W W N t o

mt uo D T CT O

i i ii! ' i i 111 li ilj}ji I({jjift]j! i! !ji ii i:i I;i

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O

e-*

0 en M COOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O ed c O O O 3 M 4 4 O co M M & M N O O co E5 a m D. CD. N. M.O.N.N.N.N.M.@.N.<.4.O D.

o .

OP N O O LO 4 -* N M - -* * @ 00 M - N e-o e Q O

M COOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O CC O e-*

a . O. CB. N. N.4. CB. M. CC CA CC N. N. . M. (C N. O.

NOOOM--M @NM e-* N N O e-* C C O

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O O O N ** O - N N N 4 M CB @ CO 4J - NNM M 4@ M m . M.

Z to 4 N O O

.O W -

H E- -

D -~ E!

CC ', v 4

- OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O Z A 0 0 4 N N e-* LO O M N M M M N H x u a e-< m e-o e-o ,e e-s e-o m CB.

e- N m CC C a

- % M M ~ M Q U *J VJ W Z W

N O :: O a - E- M N H OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O

< Z C coNNO@ NOON- M M N J O .J "-*~ ~~~N O O a a D C4 W L W N - N W O

C w m

< W W

H H Z - N W E OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O O N O M M M N 4 O CC C C M CB C m o- s.2 e- e ~ e* e* N O a

CA W e-o e*

Z O E-O M C O

N O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O a NDN e* MN e-* Mm ~ ~

N N O

C C >

4 0

. 4 4b n M MM V

o ZW ZZZW W Wmmm W W W mmmm 3 3 CE 3X/Z 3 [; 3 c C e w Z W W m m :s .s Z a Ea ed C d C C E- UH 2.2-20

Mend. X Dec. 1981 f %.

{ \

't.)

o M

C 0000000000000000 O

-- COONM@ NMMQMm4MM M 4

- c MQMOM--@ mN4400-M a a a a a a a a a a M

a Es a a a a a a e O NNM-NNWOOMMO@mMN O CH N44Mm@NNN4NNMN-~ M m - - M O

O C000000000000000 O O C00000000000000O O 4 O 4 a O.M. .M.M.M.M.4.m.m.m.N.M.m.m.o. M.

NODN-4NDDmON44ND D O O - -N - N M 4 - M m

M C C 2 - 4 000000000000000O O O O

C000000000000000 O 4

- W G O 4 9 g v a 4. m. N. M. C. O. N. . N. M. O. O. . m. m. @. m.

D - @N@ -4NM4cN@@~One M m M M 0 0 - WM N - M C

- O M - N

% % C H % C m M a

- % M

< C U 'd O O O M Q M C000000000000000 (N l i Z W C000000000000000 O 4 N O = 0 N.M.m.m.@.~.M.4.N.N.C.O.@.m. . N.

N. O.

(\# / . m g a N H NCOONM@NN-MONMN- -

< Z O - 004 M

4 W 4 O N A O %

M % %

< O H % m W O H A N 0000000000000000 O O Z - O000000000000000 O 4 W Z O N. . . .4.C.M.N.@.M.N.4.M.M.4.M. M. M.

a p

- O 4mNN4mmm4MNMNNNM M 4 to it) O NNM - m O W - - N

% O H

O M C 0 m - ** C000000000000000 O O

- d M COONM@ NMMCMW4M-M 4 4 EM C40m4Q4440-4NNMN O O a a a a a a a a a a a a =

a a a O a a CH N44M4NNN---MW4-* N N

- 4 4 0

C >

'd

.Os 4 M @

U ZWWWWWWWW 333333 - *

O ZZZ mmm mmm kZ c d m W Z W W m m 3 J V Ed d O 2 O

. A H UH v) 2.2-21

Amend. X Dec. 1981 o

.-e O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O

. * - OOON@ mM 0NO@ O e* in ** M 00

e4 d ga CB. @. .N M. N. 4. W. M. N. Ch. O. . Ch. N. .@ in. O.

e O m c ** N O C0 m C 4 @ 4 N N M Q4 5 OH - 4 C CB C 6 N e* NONN4Nm M O D ~N CC C

m OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O CC O

y CC. m. .5 N. N. M. 4. m. 00. N. 4 4. M. N. O. CB. CC. O.

NN4MCON@4ON04MNM CB N O & N ~ ** ~ nn 4 ** CC m

IS O O

- 4 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O

OOOOOOOOCOOOOOOO O CC Z E O -

o v a N. Ch. C. N.CB. N. @. ~. m. O. 4. O. O. N. M. M. . N.

M W 4 CC @ W CC O N M 4 O O 4 CC M M 4 N N H H 0 0

4N M M CC M D - O M ** N GQ Cn C W c

% A. J H % v:

n c3 -*

m x Q Q U C M COOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O CC Z W OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O CC M O :: O @ ~

g - g a 4 5. @. @. @. O. N. CB. 4. N. m. N. 00. N. CB. C. . .

N H 5 O

. # Z O - 4 O- M.-e- Q tn CO 4 - CB - N N 4 - N - ** 4 m N d O N

a M O D W W A W W O cc 4 Cn

< W H H W O Z w N OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O W Z OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O CC Q O @

% o a CB. in. M. N. N. M. @. O. M. 4. c*. M. m. 4. . @. . m.

Z C M CB 4 CB M N 4 W Ln M N M - N N M 4 N W O N-M - 4 O X O ~s ** N E*

O CB C CB -

m Q d e-4 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O d c C O O N CC CB - O N O @ O**C*M CC CC E *a

, e o m. D. @. @. M. **. CC. O. M. m . N. N. O. N. 03. N. CR. Cb.

CH N inLn 4 M N O N M ** - 4 @ 4 -

N N l

- ~ D D s

1 d >

o .m a -4 *J M O V H M H o ZW ZZZW W WcnW cnWto W Cn cn cn3cn 3 3 3e [z:

4y[3 a a

cm u Z W W cn ca 3 t 4 E4

-< 0 2 O Q H U E*

O 2.2-22

l An:nd. X Dec. 1981 rm v) i o

M U OOOOOOCCOOOOOOOO O

-- COONN-NNONC@MC-N N m@

ga m. @. N. . N. O. N. @. 0 4. N. 4 4. O. D. N. N.

e o memMmmmN@@4N4-@4 N OH ~4000WN-NONN4N-~ m m NN W C

m C00000C000000000 O O C000000000000C00 C N O

a - .m. . C. M. 4. u~.....- @ Q M. m. m. m. m. m. m. N.

M N m 4 - L) N C 4 N N 4 4 M N M O N O -N - N m 4 - @

m M C 0 4 0000000000000000 O O

- C000000000000000 O N Z -w 0 CNM-mCmmM4WONQMN O N O E a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a =

- W v 4mN MocNN4-mmOMM4 4 -

H H O - 4N M N m N D - U M - N D m O

- =

% L c H X J m = m

- g -

O O C C M 0000000000000000 O O U Z W C000000000000000 O N M O = C Mm4mM-NmONO-NNm4 N N

) I - H w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a s"j N H O c: m 4 - O N M 4 - N - - m N

. < Z O - NNQ - - @ N N W O N -- M e D %

W A N

?

- m

<' W H H W C Z - N 000000000000000O O O W Z C000000000000000 O N O C m O y M. . C. N .m. m. N .O. M. m. m. O. O. O. . c. M. C.

m m MomONN4mmM-M-NNM N C W C - NNM - 4 O x O - - N H

O O O O "

N 0 OC00000000000000 O O

- "c

- COONN-NNmNMCM@ ~ N N N Ea -4m%c-MoMNNmm4NN N N e C * * *

a a a = =

a a a * * * *

OH NCm4MN-----4@4-~ O O

- - @ C O

C >

o w e4 Q d M O ZWWWWWWWm3333 - - -

0 ZZZ mmm mmm Q Z @4 n an b Z W W m m 3 J Z d Ed

- O 2 O O H UH 2.2-23

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O

O m

C COOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O

-- O O O N & 4 4 - cc M & cc O N - - N M

l'E" w tn. Q. >. CC. 4. . 0C. s2. N. . D. N. O. @. 00. O. D.

. O men e - e m N e - 4 N e m e ,x N OH -stDO-@ N - N D N N st - - - O lD NN O O

c oOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O N O e.

w N. c. M. st. N. N. 4 0 4 4.cc. C. C. N .O. N. to.

CC N Ln st - 0 N Q st - N O st M CC M d N O -N ~~ N O 4 - e i

O

^ st OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O LS OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O N Z C Oj s? - O N d 0 st CC C s7 O O G to M N - O C - st - * - * * - *********- - -

- N - 4 O O M & C N N s7 N m st - M M st CC N H H EJ O ,' N st N M N O CC

= - u M - N O Z

- . l.

H z =,

Z CO -? !

- % w!

O O #

C{

-- M, OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O Z Z C ;' '

OOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO O N C = ! Ol N M. - H N N O.C.O.N.N. &. N. CC.

'7., . C. . CC. 4 . &.

l c M N H .

\

- 4-N4x4-ONN4-N--

< r >

O! -NNc -- N M

cC N 4 O i Nl -- tn D X

$ N

~

N

x t

< Z i-- H - !' O!

C Z - N OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC C W E d i CO OOOOOOOOCOOOOO O N

! O'

_O c s. 0 4. O. %. C. C. N. &. ~. M N. . N. CC. C. . C. M. N.

Z c ; .OcONN 44CM-NOCNM A CC

..C O, -NNM 4 O Z O ' - N I

t - t

(

"'" w w

N t c l !- -; OOO OOOOOOOOOOOOC C O I ;~;: OOON & 4 st - CC M & CC O N -- N N I E .e ! *@ - @

la Of - M. O. O. 4. . C. CC. M. N. N. C. e *. . . .

. . O.

N N lC Hl

'- t NN c. 4 M N -----inn 4--

- 4 @

j l

i l

b l U!

c .

.l 4

. n U Y&ENNNNNVbb h #

t. , xzz z w mzm w z mzm z :s r.

J z zz a

-: 3 a:

gaC

.H' O w O! H UH 2.2-24 t

bend. X Dec. 1981 d O M

0 0000000000000000 O

- 0004444O@ MM@ Nm-- O

- m O.N.m.N.N.m.O.Q.C.4.m.C.a .m.m.m. N.

ga a O m-mm4MC@m4-McMQM -

CH -OOO-mN-NNCN4--- N 4 NN m O

m C000000000000000 O O C000000000000000 O O O @

y 4 4.m.m.N.N.4.N.M.N.N.Q.N.N.N.N. . N.

@ND4NDND4N-D4M@M @

O -N - - N N 4 - m O

4 0000000000000000 O O C000000000000000 O O Z ^ C 4 4 o e a M. N. 4. Q. m. m. 4. m. M. . m. o. m. 4. M. .

- W L 4004mONN4QN4NMM4 - 4 H H - O N-4N M N O m D - - M N N

= m E

- v M L H % C m m u

- Z C C U m O 4 M 0000000000000000 O O W Z W m CC00000000000000 O O N M C =

O

- O.m. .M.N.N.m.m.e.m.o.c. .M.M. @ Q

}

e - p c a . . .

w/ N.

H ~4-4WM4-ONN4-N-- M s1

Z O -NNN - - M m N d O N ~~ M D D X W L k a O

= % D

< W H H A O Z - N 0000000000000000 O O W Z C000000000000000 O O C O @ 4

- o a @. m. N. O. C. @. N. O. N. O. M. M. N. O. . N. .

m m MO@ -MN440-MNM4NM 4 m W O -NNM 4 O X O - - N H

O N O O -

[ N 0

-- C00000000000000O O O

- m COO 4444CMMMmNM-- C C Es e o - M.e. .N.o.m.b.M.M.N.N.4.N.c.0

. m. m.

CH NmedM-~~~~~@ NM-~ 4 4 0

C >

0 &

c4 4J d m O

o ZWWWWWWWm ZZZ mmm 3333332 mmm Mkx m

~~

3 m u Z W W m m3 e Z u sa

- o 2 o

( e Q H UH r !

N 2.2-25

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O

O

.-e

!0 ! OCCCCCOOOCOOOOCC C i- -i C C C 4 m 4 4 C cc n m o n N OO cc

- c' gs cc. C. N. O. . C. S. N. C. cc. 4. C. .N. - C. C. N.

.t O cc n N d cc & C 4 4 N C 5 C N M

' lC Hi - D C ** - O N - N C N N 4 - ** - m

'c i NN 7 I

i Ol i

i l

m.

0:

j CCCCCCOCCO.

OCCOCCCC CCC 7; O O C C OCOCO O O

N C

cc I

l a; m. a. m. :C. C.cc. m . o.cc. N. m. . 4. N. e. m. . N.

CCd4NCNdM-Md4MN M M M Cf a N - - N n

~7 ; ** 7 i

f f

' wasp l <- OCCCCOOCCOCOCCCC C C

^ : O COCOCCOOOCCCCOC C cc Z

3

u-0

C.C. .N.<.~.~.C.N. N.cc. <. . . C. N . n. C.

- '.d

. -; , N O ""* d O d N N M N d s7 C N O N - O H H --l Oi c4 -<N 9 N C C O - EL M N CC O Z v;

'er H % .:

, Z Z C i - % O' O U *: O

--/; m: COO OOOOCCCCOCCOC C C Z Z Z OO O OOOCOOCOCCOCC O CC r, = O- Ol O. O. N.

N

. O. O. C. d. O. O. N. C. M. &. O. N. O. N.

.O H u.

N H ~ - M NN N CC %* --NN M-***- w? CC

"' E O' -N NN -- O C N

C N' ~- M C O %

Z.

n Z

m'm MW 9

O Z H H - 0; i z - N OOOO OOOOCCOC OOCC C C

! Z Z OOO OO OOOOOOOOOCC C cc O 0, N c .s . O. C. N. . . O. O. O. O. . n. C. 5. O. . L.a. . N.

"f, #, ,

9NN N *7 N s7 s7 4 N - 04 N # NN C *7 "4

. O. -NN * ~7 -

Z -

O - - N a

l Ok N

- - 0 OOOOOOOCOOOCOOO c O I

C O O ~7 M 4 -7 O :C M M & MN OC % CC

-5 ."*

i

, e ce - f O. N. . T. N. N.N.N.n. 7. N.4 4 7 D.

N f.

'O Hi N O i.f' d s7 - 0 4 - - - - C CC M ea N

- - O c i

l I

I w

Ci >

cr

'., Z :.4 ~4 Z Z . ".d

. W Z Z 3333333 - --

'L zzz cn Z Z ZZZ ZZZ 7 e l - Z Z Z Z Z 3 3 Z .J EJ

- o = c C- i-* OH i

2.2-26 t

Amend. X D:c. 1981

[' ') TABLE 2.2-4

'Q ESTIMATES OF TRAFFIC VOLUME FOR HIGHWAYS IN VICINITY OF THE CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLANT, 1980 Measuring Average Daily Highway Location Traffic (ADT)

Interstate 40 Intersection of 21,130 I-40 and Tennessee 58 Tennessee 58 Average between 8,525 10 intersection of I-40 and Tennessee 58 and intersection of Tenn 58 and Tenn 95 Tennessee 95 Intersection of 4,500 Tenn 58 and Tenn 95 m

(v I Source: Tennessee Department of Transportation, Bureau of Planning and Programming, Of fice of Research and Planning, 1980 Average Daily Traffic, 1980.

i l

m

{

2.2-27 1 --__ ___ - -- -. _ _ - _ -

\

l

! Anend. X

Dec. 1981 j TABLE 2.2-5 i

RESIDENT EQUIVALENT POPULATION FOR TRANSPORTATION TRANSIENTS l

WITIIIN 5-MILES OF TIIE CRBRP SITE Interstate 40 Resident Equivalent = 350 persons Radius Distance Resident ;

From Site (mi) Direction Equivalent 4-5 ESE 39 3-4 ESE 39 2-3 SSE 39 l-2 SE 39 l-2 S 39 l-2 SSW 39 2-3 SW 39 3-4 WSW 39 4-5 W 39 Tennessee 58 lb l

Resident Equivalent = 110 Resident istance Direction Equivalent 3-4 WUW 14 2-3 W 14 1-2 WNW 14 1-2 NW 14 1-2 NNW 14 2-3 N 14 l 3-4 N 14 t

4-5 NNE 14 l

Tennessee 95

Resident Equivalent = 40 l

Resident Distance Direction Equivalent 3-4 ESE 8 3-4 E 8 3-4 ENE 8 3-4 NE 8 4-5 NNE 8 2.2-28 .__ _. . . - . _ _ _ - - _. _ _ _ . . . - _ ~ _ . .-.

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 2.2-6 EMPLOYMENT AND RESIDENT EQUIVALENTS AT THE ORGDP, ORNL, AND Y-12 FACILITIES (1981) i Plant / Shift Employment Equivalent ORNL

\

Monday through Friday 4,820 1,160 4-12 shift 125 30 12-8 shift 60 15 Weekends (3 shifts) 120 11 l

Total 5,125 1,216 ORGDP 10 Monday through Friday 4,230 1,015

! 4-12 shift 525 125 12-8 shift 255 60 Weekends (3 shifts) 630 60 Total 5,640 1,260

Y-12 I

Monday through Friday 5,000 1,200 4-12 shift 950 225 i 12-8 shift 100 25 Weekends (3 shifts) 270 25 ;

Total 6,320 1,475 Source: Written communications, Mr. R. G. Jordan, Manager, Health Safety, and Environmental Af fairs, Union Carbide Corporation, Nuclear Division, Tennessee, to R. C. Baker, TVA, April 8, 1981, i

O 2.2-29

Amend. X .

Dec. 1981 TABLE 2.2-7 ,

SECTOR DISTRIBUTION OF DAILY TRANSIENTS ASSOCIATED

! WITH THE OAK RIDGE COMPLEX Resident Distance Facility E 3 uivalents Direction (miles)

ORGDP 170 N 3-4 l 850 NNW 3-4 l 120 N 2-3 120 NNW 2-3 I ORNL 1,216 NE 5-10 Y-12 1,475 NE 5-10 9:

O 2.2-30

gS p gy

\,

\ ,/

TABI E 2.2-8 ESTIMATED AVERnGE PEAK 110UR USE AT RECREATION AREAS WITIIIN 10 MII.ES OF Tile CRBRP SITE, 1980 TO 2030 Orientation to Recreation CRBRP Site Estimated Number of Persons Present Site Distance During Peak llour Site Description Number (radial mi) Direction 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Commercial Campground 1 1.5 SSE 270 340 380 420 462 500 Public Access 2 1.5 NNW 95 115 130 145 160 175 Visitor Overlook 3 2.5 NNW 20 25 30 30 33 33 Incidental Use 4 2.5 NNW 29 32 35 39 43 47 Commercial Recreation Area (Crosseyed Cricket) 5 3.5 SE 80 100 110 120 132 144 Atomic Speedway 6 2.5 ESE 6000 6500 7000 7300 8030 8600

.N 95 115 130 145 160 175 10 y Public Access (TVA) 7 3.5 E g Visitor Overlook (Graphite Reactor) 8 4.5 NE 20 25 30 30 33 33 Incidental Use 9 4.5 W 29 32 35 39 43 47 Incidental Use 10 4.5 W 29 32 35 39 43 47 Melton Ilill Dam Reservation 11 4.5 E 887 976 1074 1181 1299 1400 Public Access 12 5 W 55 70 80 90 99 110 Incidental Use 13 6 W 29 32 35 39 43 47 Kingston Wildlife Area 14 6 W 5 6 7 8 9 10 Private Club 15 6 WNW 20 25 30 30 33 33 Public Access 16 6 W 55 70 80 90 99 110 Center's Ferry 17 6.5 W 11 12 13 14 15 16 Oak Ridge Sportsmen ,

Association 18 7 NNE --

Wildlife Management Area 19 7 W 135 170 190 210 231 250 Incidental Use 20 6.5 WNW 29 32 35 39 43 47 Incidental Use 21 6.5 hv 29 32 35 39 43 47 Public Access 22 7 E 55 70 80 90 99 110 E@

Incidental Use 23 7 NW 29 32 35 39 43 47 PE Incidental Use 24 8 NW 29 32 35 39 43 47 ~P Incidental Use 25 8 NN 29 32 35 39 43 47 $x

~

Anchor Dock 26 8 NW 218 240 264 290 319 350 Public Use 27 8 NW 55 70 80 90 99 110 (Continued)

(___. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . .___- - ._ - - . _ _ . . _ . -

TABLE 2.2-8 (ConLinued)

Orientation to Recreation CRBHP Site Estimated Number of Persons Present Site Distance During Peak llour Number (radial mi) Direct. ion 1980 1990 ."000 2010 2020 2030 Site Description 28 8.5 NW 29 32 35 39 43 47

} Incidental Use

'9 8.5 NW 95 115 130 160 176 210 Public Use l NW 55 70 80 90 99 110 Incidental lise 30 8.5 Public Access 31 7.5 E 95 115 130 160 176 210 l

32 7.5 SW 5 6 7 8 9 10 i Johnson Valley 7.5 5 6 7 8 9 10 llines Creek 33 S Public Access (Dogwood) 34 7.5 SSW 5 6 7 8 9 10 Long Island !!a rina 35 7.5 WSW 41 45 49 54 59 64 Incidental Use 36 7.5 SW 29 32 35 39 43 47 Hickory Creek 37 7.5 E 68 75 82 90 99 110

. Parker's Golf Course 38 7.5 WEW 135 149 164 180 198 218 20 25 30 35 39 43

'f Public Access 39 7 ENE 95 130 160 176 210 10 M Public Access 40 7.5 W 115 Public Access 41 8 WNW 20 25 30 35 39 43 Incidental Use 42 8 W 29 32 35 39 43 47 l

i Oak Ridge City Baseball ,

Field 43 8 NNE .

l 44 9 NNE - -- - -- -- --

Girl Scout Camp Friendship Kingston Waterfront Park 45 8 W 194 213 234 257 283 310 Incidental Use 46 8 W 29 32 35 39 43 47 Incidental Use 47 8.5 SSW 29 32 35 39 43 47 Southwest Point Park 48 8.5 WSW 55 70 80 95 105 120 l

Public Access 49 8.5 W 20 25 30 35 39 43 l

Knox County Park 50 9 ENE 68 75 82 90 99 110 Carbide Park 51 8 ENE 90 99 109 120 132 145 l

James Ferry (Public Access) 52 9 WSW 5 6 7 8 9 10

) WSW 75 83 91 100 110 120 i Riley Point (Public Access) 53 9 Southwest Point Golf Course 54 9 WSW 139 153 168 185 204 225 j Wildlife Blanagement Area 8 SW 55 60 65 70 77 84 (Paint Rock) 55 Wildlif e !!anagement Area 56 8.5 WSW 3 4 4 4 4 4 F3'

] P@c 1

(Long Island) 1 w.t (Continued) $x

~

O O O TABLE 2.2-8 (Continued)

Orientation to i

! Recreation CRBRP Site Estimated Number of Persons Present i Site Distance During Peak ifour Site Description Number (radial mi) Direction 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 i

Incidental Use 37 9 ENE 29 32 35 39 43 47 Public Access 58 9 SW 25 30 35 40 44 48

. Incidental Use 59 S.5 SW 29 32 35 39 43 47 Public Access (Laurel Bluff) 60 9.5 SW 5 6 7 8 9 10 Public Access 61 9.5 WSW 25 35 40 40 44 44 10 j Incidental Use 62 9.5 WSW 29 32 35 39 43 47 Public Access (Riley Creek) 63 10 WSW 9 11 12 13 14 15 i

." Source: Tennessee Valley Authority, Of fice of Natural Resources, Recreation Resources Program.

Not available U

p 1

5' 5" Pe P

1

, , _ _ . .__.__.-...._-_..m.,. . . _ _ _ _ _ , . - . _ , _ . , , . - .

__,y,_ ,__-..._,.,s , , , . . . , , . . _ - _ _ . . . . _ . . . . _ _ a. ___..,y.

Amend. x Dec. 1981 TABLE 2.2-9 RESIDENT EQUIVALENTS FOR RECREATION AREAS WITHIN 10 ?lILES OF THE CRBRP SITE, 1980 to 2030 Orientation to Recreation CRBRP Site Estimated Number of Persons Present Site Distance During Peak llour Number (radial mi' 'rection 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 1 1.5 SSE 270 340 380 420 462 500 2 1.5 NNW 380 460 520 580 640 700 3 2.5 KNW 80 100 120 120 132 132 4 2.5 NNW 116 128 140 156 172 188 5 3.5 SE 320 400 440 480 528 576 6 2.5 ESE NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 3.5 E 380 460 520 580 640 700 8 4.5 NE 80 100 120 120 132 132 9 4.5 W 116 128 140 156 172 188 10 4.5 W 116 128 140 156 172 188 11 4.5 E 3548 3904 4296 4724 5196 5600 12 5 W 220 280 320 360 396 440 13 6 W t16 128 140 156 172 188 10 14 6 W 29 24 28 32 36 40 15 6 WNW 80 100 120 120 132 132 16 6 W 220 280 320 360 396 440 17 6.5 W 4 4... 48 52 56 60 64 18 7 NNE -- --

19 7 W 540 680 760 840 924 1000 20 6.5 WNW 116 128 140 156 172 188 21 6.5 NW 116 128 140 156 172 188 22 7 E 220 280 320 360 396 440 23 7 NW 116 128 140 156 172 188 24 8 NW 116 128 148 156 172 188 25 L NW 116 128 148 156 172 188 26 8 NW 872 960 1056 1160 1276 1400

7 8 NW 220 280 320 360 396 440 28 8.5 NW 116 128 148 156 172 188 29 8.5 NW 380 460 520 640 704 840 30 8.5 NW 220 280 320 360 396 440 31 7.5 E 280 460 520 640 704 840 12 7.5 SW 20 24 28 32 36 40 13 7.5 S 20 24 28 32 36 40 14 7.5 SSW 20 24 28 32 36 40 (Continued)

O 2.2-34

Amend. X Dec. 1931 TABLE 2.2-9 (Continued)

[)'

\_-

Orientation to Recreation CRBRP Site Estimated Number of Persons Present Site Distance During Peak Hour Numbe r (radial mi) Direction 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 35 7.5 WSW 164 180 196 216 236 256 36 7.5 SW 116 128 148 156 172 188 37 7.5 E 272 300 328 360 396 440 38 7.5 WSW 540 596 656 720 792 872 39 7 ENE 80 100 120 140 156 172 40 7.5 W 380 460 520 6/ 0 704 840 41 8 WNW 80 100 120 140 156 172 42 8 W 116_;. 128 148 156 172 188 43 8 NNE - ,3 44 9 NNE -- -- -- -- -- --

45 8 W 776 852 936 1028 1132 1240 46 8 W 116 128 148 156 172 188 47 8.5 SSW 116 128 148 156 172 188 48 8.5 WSW 220 280 320 380 420 480 49 8.5 W 80 100 120 140 156 172 272 300 328 360 396 440 10 50 9 ENE 51 8 ENE 360 396 436 480 528 580 52 9 WSW 20 24 28 32 36 40

/ 53 9 WSW 300 332 364 400 440 480

'N 54 9 WSW 556 612 672 740 816 90:

55 8 SW 220 240 260 280 308 336 56 8.5 WSW 16 16 16 16 16 16 57 9 ENE 116 128 148 156 172 188 58 9 SW 100 120 140 160 176 192 59 9.5 SW 116 128 148 156 172 188 60 9.5 SW 20 24 28 32 36 40 61 9.5 WSW 100 140 160 160 176 176 62 9.5 WSW 116 128 148 156 172 188 63 10 WSW 36 44 48 52 56 60 ACan not be calculated because of incomplete data O

2.2-35

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 2.2-10 CUMULATIVE POPULATION DENSITY FOR AREA WITilIN 30 MILES OF Tile CFBRP SITE, 1980 TIIROUGli 2030 Cumulative Population Density (Persons per Square Mile)

Distance Year _

(mi) 1980_ 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 1 48 51 51 54 64 67 2 133 150 161 172 186 197 3 105 112 119 128 137 143 10 4 117 124 131 130 148 153 5 154 164 177 188 200 210 10 228 255 270 284 297 313 20 179 179 185 187 189 195 30 190 202 213 216 220 226 O

l l

l

O l 2.2-36 l

h V

\d

)

TABLE 2.2-11 SC1100L POPULATION WITil1N 10-MILE RADIUS OF CHBRP SITE School System Forecast Ander,on C >aty No schoels are within 10 miles of site and none forecast for 1980 or 1990.

Oak Ridge No schools are within 10 mile of site. A aew elementary school (K-6) is likely by 1990 in western Oak Ridge to accommodate 725 students.

Knox County No schools are within 10 miles of site and none forecast for 1980 or 1990.

Distance in Miles and g Direction 4 School System No. School Grades 1971 1981 1991 From Site g y

Loudon 1 North fliddle 6-8 -

424 440 --

2 Eatons K-5 638 622 650 5.0 SE 3 liighland Park K-5 380 265 310 9.5 SE Lenoir City 4 Lenoir City liigh School 9-12 910 988 1,000 8.0 SE 5 Lenoir City Middle 5-8 472 438 600 9.5 SE 6 Nichols School K-4 401 431 600 9.0 SE 7 West 11111 K-4 113 127 250 8.5 SE Morgan County 8 Coalfield Elementary K-7 375 302 310 10 NNW 9 Coalfield !!igh School 8-12 183 215 225 10 NNW Roane County 10 Cherokee 6-8 294 550 600 7.0 NNW 11 Dyllis K-8 211 354 400 5.5 Nhv 12 Emory K-8 118 196 300 7.5 hv 13 Kingston Elementary K-5 675 910 1,100 7.5 WSW 14 Roane County High School 9-12 814 760 1,000 7.5 -W EN Pe 2

i i

1 TABl.E 2.z-11 I '

SCll001. POPilLATION WITilIN 10-t!!LE RADIUS OF CRBHP SITE i,

(continued)

]

i j Dist.ance in j Miles and Direct. ion i School Systeni No. School G rades 1971 1981 1991 From Site l lia r rima n 15 Lumberland Michile School 6-8 345 264 350 9.5 WNW l 16 Ila r r iman Len' r:= 1 Elementary K-5 362 322 400 9. 5 WrN j 17 Ilarriman Iligh School 9-12 504 599 700 9.5 WNW

' 18 Bowers Elementary K-5 -

398 450 9.5 WNW

,0 1

19 Wa1 nut 11i l 1 K-5 225 238 300 10 WNW w

- 20 S. l{arriman Middle 6-8 -

203 350 10 WNW N

j i 21 Cumberland Middle 6-8 -

264 400 10 WNW i

1 K-6 9.0 NNE 1 Oak Ridge 22 New Elementary - -

725 l

Source: Interviews by TVA staff with school superintendents, April 1981. l I

I

{

Pa CO X O O O

Amend. X

,- m Dec. 1981 i \

\ /

%./

TABLE 2.2-12 HOSPITAIS WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE CRBkP SITE Distance in miles No. of No. of and Direct' ion Hospital R C County Beds Bassinets from Site Little Creek Sanitarium Concord Knox 24 --

21.5 ENE and Hospital Cumberland Medical Center Crossville Cumberland 159 10 36.5 V Rhea County Hospital Dayton Rhea 45 10 44.5 SV Woods Memorial Hospital Etowah McMinn 50 10 39.25 SSW Earriman City Hospital Harriman Roane 109 10 9.5 Whv Fentress County General Jamestown Fentress 70 9 48.0 hv Eastern State Psychiatric Knoxville Knox 1,500 --

21.5 DI East Tennessee Baptist Knoxville Knox 406 38 21.5 EhE g East Tennessee Chest Knoxville Knox 148 --

21.5 ENE 10 3 / Disease Hospital v

East Tennessee Children's Knoxville Knox 74 --

21.5 DI L -t Sanders Presbyterian Knoxville Knox 535 36 21.5 DT Park i*st Knoxville Knox 175 25 21.0 DI Northwe t General Knoxville Knox 27 4 21.5 DI St. Mary's Memorial Hospital Knoxville Knox 465 25 21.5 ENE University of Tennessee Knoxville Knox 489 60 21.5 Eh1 Memorial Research Center and Hospital LaFollette Community LaFollette Campbell 76 11 36.5 Nh1 Loudon County Memorial Loudon Loudon 50 12 10.5 SSE Blount Memorial Hospital Ma ryville Blount 288 30 25.0 ESE Regional Mental Health Oak Ridge Anderson 22 --

15.0 hI Center Oak Ridge Hospital of United Oak Ridge Anderson 220 20 15.0 NE Methodist Church Chamberlain Memorial Roc kwood Roane 67 10 16.0 W Sevier County Hospital Sevierville Sevier 44 12 45.5 E Lake City Lake City Anderson 20 --

26.0 Nh1

[

Source: Journal of the American Hospital Association. Listing of Hospitals in Tennessee, American Hospital Association Guide to the Health Care Field, 1979.

2.2-39

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 2.2-13 TRAFFIC LOCKED TifROUGH MELTON HILL DAM Recreational Craft Commercial Traffic Year (number) Total Tonnage 1966 1,198 1,000 1967 1,014 1,000 1968 1,256 2,000 1969 1,301 1,000 l 1970 929 4,000 1971 718 10,000 1972 761 4,000 1973 815 1,000 10 i

1974 631 6,000 1975 554 3,000 1976 471 4,000 1977 492 7,000 g 1978 460 3,000 ,

1979 305 11,000*

1980 284 12,000*

l l

Source: Personal Communication, U.S. Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, to W. A. Blevins, TVA, July 1981.

l

Preliminary Corps of Engineers 1

l l

O l 2.2- e

Arnend. X Dec. 1981

,m

\ r-4 i /

%/

0 0 "C 0^ On O 8 j< m6 0 m

-A + u m M. m

3 6 0 yc OC 0 0- Om X X m.

C X 0C C X CO Cm u WN O +J "J C ** m CC CC O O-U M A~ k A 0 0 % 6 6 3 6 4 HO H0 WO

= u a U2 w v~ v~ h v .-.

O C 3 U3 C ** '-4 .Q '=4 U3 0 23

CC 0E OE CE

+.# E A T U U T U M 0 mO C m fg b r3 4 0 e5 b CC .J .J X 5 4.J 44 0 % 0 > W 0 W Cm +J V O 4 k > 6 > w 6 >

H w A 6 -g W c = .4 5 ,4 0 2 -*

M V3 3Q O 3 U3 % U3 % U2 U2 %

A L

CO 0 + +

0^ + +

W 0 v: r./2 O O O O O O O O

= DC D C O C C C O O O O

& C C L h- C. O. O. O. O. O. O. C.

N O-- N O C C C 4 m O C > - - " LA C C O M C

< n 50 4 4 h N A Q v) O. O.

p - -

O

% C O

W - t 4 O O O O O O O 4 A a 0 O O O O O O O O ^

- - ": > - O m= o= m N O O "O t E - - L = a =

0

/N N e cc = 0 m 4 m Q N O O

/ '

O O L ~ C C '4 {

k,.*x// N N -

L l *")

W

< % C O O O A U

< Z. v E-= %

H

- 0 3 0 0 C Ch +.* C 0 W ~: se e n

- m N 5 cc a .E .a. gn- m 0li . c. cc. . O. . cc.

O XC -l M C cc cc c cc O O L

O C

L-E.{

O Ei

~ ~ -

U3 L ": 6 vi L-A l

% < "O t i

H % !

3 U

- % 0 3 0 hC C .a .J c h D C -* O . sa L 4 - CE O

O ee U - x

.J w ed C C D C C sa C C 7 R > Z

. 3 = so cc 4a se C C O 6 0 0 -d C

>l n e* C 0 en C U .C C

-l - a.* 6 E 4 W O O C M m

~~

e ua a a u m :s e n 0 mO Om m O <

3 .C .a -* C -a =. bC O 4 sh %

"A - U EQ "J Q C C E T.

b

= .X. .

O e e:

E U Q M M U E Z I

s .e/

w 2.2-41

i

$8o . <>

5P eCw YJ

. 0 1

O

_ e g

- e n s) g) ) i s0 nt h9 r

- ge8 g g g i n c p g nn5 n n n k e g n6S n

- e c

i n -

r e i

r l

l i

r i

r nmn i yi i

l 4

l l

i r

r pT e p e p p S ar C ed e p u

o S( l S W S S ( b p ( l n W S i

mS i u4 S ,el f ee eio t

d c d d d d c d c r6 d d

- na r n n n n ak n arG3 n n uf e u u u u f eu f e u u or v o o o o r eo rvdt !

o o r ui r r r r ur r uinR r r GSR G G G G SCG SR aC G G e, s) #

e gU : no 0 0

0 0

a r yl 0, 0, 2, 9, 0, 0, 0, 5, 0, el l 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 3 0 via 5 0 1 7 0 0 0 A a g D(

7 2 5 0, 5, 3 3 3

)

l i

c u n n o _

i i l i 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 t t e 0 0 5 1 7 0 0 4 0 )

n a v 0, 0, 2 5 5, 5, 0, 1 6, d o l r e C u e 5 2 3 0 8 3 u

( pS 1 1 n

4 1

2 p

o i C

t n

o O

(

2 E. e e l

i l eni ct _

A t aS _

T at )

msp - 4 2 4 6 5 5 3 8 8 1 i iR " .d x D 'i I 1 2 2 2 4 4 5 n7 6 7 o :

I i

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a1 1 1 rl C U pa (

pi m _

Al o i a r RF y

t r t c y a c i r t i r a n r t t l y e t s n o t y m s .

i e >

u i L e i o D m i l i l DC y

_ t y l E

e S

c s g

n i

U t

1 i

t E

y yn t o

l. i h i U e i s P i k g r xt t l l r P i c i p oc xc l i e

" t ol i l S ni oi al t d S U R o K r nr V o U n n o y r t K t o A o y t h a e t s s hh t d e nc w v si t i c c sf u n iS d i rD sD t S r o o.

i a i l i e u i 1 P P i t O F W D F O

- lN

~

m m rm (VI i )

IV) 4

! V TABLE 2.2-14 (Continued)

Approximate Radial Distance Average From CRBRP Site Population Daily Use Supply (miles) Served (ga1lons) Source llallsdale-Powell 17.5 22,000 2,800,000 Springs, Beaver Creek Utility District Surface (Bull Run Creek embayment)

Plateau Utility District 17.7 1,900 100,000 Ground, Well, Cumberland U. D.

Supplemented

- 10 Brushy Mountain 17.9 195 60,000 Ground, Well

[

u State lionor Farm Rockwood 18.0 5,500 3,000,000 Ground, Spring and Surface (King Creek embayment)

Clinton Utility Board 20.0 17,000 1,600,000 Surface (Clinch River Mile 59)

Sweetwater 20.0 5,100 900,000 Ground, Spring and Surface (Sweetwater Creek)

.;,, Main water intake is at Little Emory River Mile 2.9

, Includes Martel Utility District a

,, Supplemented by Spring @o includes Swan Pond Utility District and Wolf Branch Utility District 1

Note: The supply systems numbered I through 7 are keyed to Figure 2.2-13. G-Source: TVA telephone survey of system managers and engineers, July 1981. $x

Anwend. X Dec. 1981 O

TABLE 2.2-15 INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLIES WITHIN A 20-MluE RADIUS OF THE CRBRP SITE Approx.

Radial Distance Average From Site Daily Use Supply (miles) (gallons) Source

1. Department of 1.6 2,500,000 Surface (Clinch Energy River Mile 14.4)*

2. Department of 3.5 5,500,000 Surface (Clinch Energy River Mile 11.5)**

3. TVA Kingston Steam 7.8 1,400,000,000 Surface (Emor/ ,

Plant River Mile 1.9)

4. Lenoir City Car Works '.3

, 30,000 Ground, Well

5. The Mead Corp. 9.7 2,900,000 Su r f a ce (Emo ry Rive r Mile 11.4)

6. Union Carbtde 10.2 2,000,000 Surf ace (Tennessee River),and Ground, Spring 10

7. Department of 11.0 22.000,000 Surface (Clinch ,,

Energy River Mile 41.5)

8. Ralph Rogers Co., Inc. 11.4 24,000 Ground, Well

9. CNO & TP Railway 12.6 27,000 Surface (Emo ry River Mile 18.8).

10. A. B. Long Quarries 13.4 1,500,000 Surface (Emory River)

11. John J. Craig Co. 13.8 34,600 Surface (Small Stream) and Ground, Well

12. Philafelphia Hosiery 14.5 20,000 Ground, Well Mills

13. TVA Bull Run Steam 15.3 572,000,000 Surface (Clinch Plant River Mile 47.6),

14. Morgan Apparel Co. 17.8 3,000 Ground, Well

15. Marble Shop, Inc. 19.0 N.A. Surface (Fourth Creek River Mile 1.6)

Potable water only

- Datly mskeup for CRCDP cooling towers

+ Water supply is also used for potable water within the plant

++ Supplies 3,500,000 gallons per day to city of Oak Riige (pop. 28,319)

Source: TVA telephona survey, July 1981.

2.2-44

Amend. X Dec. 1981 LEGEND

--- C R B R P SITE BOUNDARY \'

./ cf $

sN J

CN

\

~

' N 4\ \

t % . ROAD _

R$83 ISLANDS 10

/

CENTER g /

\. \ e e

~

I

\ '

~

. \

y f e 'N h j ,

90 0 o 9

0 E Q

0 1/2 i g

SCALE OF MILES 9 Figure 2.2-1 APPR0XIMATE CENTER OF PENINSULA USED FOR DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 2.2-45 i

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O

" CUwER N S PRiNGS y,h'/ m! ME

\

)$ f cAn a,c at j) OAuCALE

,/ [x \

e*//

3,

/ g s'

NRl h \ r s's

/ -l \ '&l/,/'?;[j

b ,, - -

. .i /

) i ,- nesE[vfrion

("'plL fj' s

\. \

////jk, .

f 7 V ,)/,/'//%,' '

6 h ,. ' . ,/ k$h / "~

/ I' .l'$ b f' k hLl'W s

/

i %,; /

[ / h,:p,///w-y/,/.Q/j/,',r;%

.',.v'/ \'Q.hM(

e n t

o.

,. s

p. y,j,L.x/

f

/;'s,~?, *x/3' V, ;/ < , / g,%f'\%;

7, ., , .

?

~f; ' .

Anwva~ .

/ W ff -

. Sh ' 3 0.L. . / $',k'f!,/ i/ '

f, r

&';;l-Q nestevfrnon,a l/pq',3,%'/'fy.. ,.

LDBi n . M~ ex M*',,!&._#ff&2 $ p/ssjlt.

,\

u e, ;,

O'p'/ p, 'g, .

l fy2 D' N;/'NV +l%'(.p

' ~

' J- *v

~

< 1 ,i jE 10 n ,s .. - y g ~.~s n '

1 A < w

\m'v'. ;-

.N

. fx%

._ , / ,~ ,/ I ~ , G Q~a ;

I j( //*ssses pg(bn s

.'Nw,J ~\ / . '

g-s

/'\

,N '.

g.

' \ ' '

j 4' -fi V' 1 Qn 5 'x,'

N. Est 3pa N ag,0,o/ x m r c: r n

) \

e

~

u e ~x e.4

.a- i{ .

=

sa&vW Shs. I % % {' i s ,fp' Q '#

,u v

'N / bi//h{}.4/ M %M

%,(h

.. .e, fxss4k // N b~ ^( ' c ;s. "Ts.lli9 f^U) Y

^

-m

S 'd t'

/y 7 n4 ~ ~ &,xy u^

/

eux.h pf fxj-) %

\

Figure 2.2-2 STUDY AREA WITHIN 10-MILES OF THE CRBRP SITE.

O 2.2-46

f V \ s,_/

j g .o wc o w y~

( .

58 % ~\

\

4eEq

/ . .

BEAR CREEK CREEK J l D g

.F, v j-) ^ .-

CREEK I ' --

FIVE l 4 MILE

. R A DIUS

,) f- -

si ggEL --

ORN E q 'u ' - l e %.'hs 1 i 4

N l N+

b . pt, 0# D. O. E. !!. me 10 PROPERTY +

WHITE OAK DAM ../ w

, n. .:J N %,N g.* :g , . ::

N , , c,,,

HILL .

5.

f MQ'#

J DAM /

/ D.O.E. BOUNDARY --

I I

,l o v2 e .

f SCALE OF MILE 95 e f ./

n n to Figure 2.2-3 00E/0AK RIDGE LABORATORY COMPLEX R B0UtlDARY RELATIVE TO CRBRP SITE. G-

ftmend. X Dec. 1981 O

N NNW I NNE RESrpENTIAL MORGAN '

e OAK R~ G 's NW COUNTY g NE g v- 61 ROANE COUNTY %

ANDERSON i 95 COUNTY

, 9 '<

WNW ,

i d \f ENE HARRI M AN Y g s

- # # KNOX

+ cuMCH nive, COUNTY f w wurow x' 10 W -

58 H'u- ** -

E s s N KINGSTON 7-70 ROANE COUNTY WSW ESE

~ Qh '4ys f / LOUDON COUNTY SW M s '$TY SE SSW , SSE o 5 S

l ! ! ! z I SCALE OF MILES I

Figurn 2.2-4 URBAN AREAS WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE CRBRP SITE.

2.2--48 L

O O O BELL f_RGIN f A woNRet

* * ' cua roN 4

AVNE uc cat Any N

A sigg,gy s _ ~ -

b HANCoCK l PICRf f f A #% %

[ ..... ,.i

. A,,o.,,

yLAv - .!

p ,,, .,,z. ...\

g> m.

C A Mf' ELL V

H A WR iks

,/

l g . ,,,,,/,uniow

\

JAcasow N / G"A'NGE" #- %

p

= 0

\ -[%\\scon %., ,

e s of /

% ANDE oN \' ! .

b'3

-f # 'g N,

^ MoRGA A gg A\

PU T N A W f*'n h/ cuwstRLAND .\ * *"D"'9 pp*., / h)/ JU ERsoN 8

[ coext y'7 .

?j

/% \ '

oe.n

\

~...,i..- ,

g

, s.j f x Crossvill. i %, / p 1 -

- N o 10 oE MALS g g E N "* ea e 4 i antic b

'j - Q ./ N'*x - D ~\. \ """

h <'(Q gi{y g,w)y c '

-< ~ -

"A'*000

Aant" e tosor /

'et

# # s......,

'%s

i ,

,- O/ uc um i \ 7 ,0'y a L,4; [ [Mf = 'n cae swAim f" ,

- g g y/ , ,

'8 so-wounot ..

g G y I '

ME'Es #\ A'* m

b,

{*j .e*d

'f cau%cv

,' s

/j, +88Ha*

p" k JAcasom j stouATcMit '

$}

hI kproo- , 'k $.]? u. .Aco,

uAntow A . , ,, o ,

e lBaaoLEY / PcLu s cHrmontt

,/

CLAY N

't.,

y .

r q 1,

[ } k

' l' l ** * . .e ,o l / esas

?h" P*

~."

Figure 2.2-5 CIRCLE AtlD SECTOR FIGURE AliD STUDY AREA WITHIN 50-HILES OF THE 8x

~

CRCRP SITE.

Amend. X Dec. 1981 N

O NNW NNE R GE g Nw p' 4 ' NE

- 6l

,[' 28 s WNW s s:g <

N '

,. q NE 2' s

'N H ARRIMAN261 20 m i'

A s i5 \ 57

- s ,

39 73

s g '

9%W'lkit. '

so' gw 47 34 y

\'

75 LEPJ R .

SE r RECREATIONAL SITE l' o 3 NUMBERS ARE KEYED TO TABLE 2.2-8 SSw f) k' SSE F: i scAu n uus

1 3

Figure 2.2-6 RECREATIONAL AREAS WITHIN 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE CRBRP SITE.

O 2.2-50

Amend. X Dec. 1981 m ~

[v. ;

,. $ + + o.1 MILE Legend:

I 1 Resident Population it

~

3 Resident Equivalent h 3 Population N

a

. Total Population 5

2.000 im u o.a .

,/

's" n-

/

l...El a , e....

\ li; s, /.

... 4 til s

, . +. y 1; dA o

,. a .,';r .'E*,

.n.

y 2.

n >

=/. .

$ .ro it b skAfE/l j m yu -

4

'~' *- 10

.a:

.,7 = ,,, .5 (g)

.. ::o ,a.

g . ...

,- m. t5 i# r. s .' E E

., v5 - is ..

\~ c 't' !? 11, i M . ,. " /j j kdI' .. .

                                                                                                                          $ 3.q da                                                                             ..
                                                     / / '. / r,, [ ' {f g \** ss o                           ;
                                           / ;,                        '
                                                                           ,", j            ,,.                           2                                 $

l l_e t .is \"" ' ' ' \ "* 5 m n, , / v.a oo

                                                     /
                                                   /

b $ (Refer to 3 Tables 2.2-2A, 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8) i i Figure 2.2-7A 1980 RESIDENT AND TRANSIE"1 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION,

 ^)                                          0 TO 10 MILES.

i 2.2-51

Amend. X Dec. 1981 Legend: Resident Population m

                                                         /        O-I MILE                                                                                                         Resident Equivalent w
                                             /    -/ - ,\                                                                                                                                    Population
                                           //-                7
                                                                 \

e M,f(/'

//

m 1 Total Population

                        -i. .      7              s N                                     /
                                          .          'a      /               , ./
                                                                       ,-                                \

5 ) <'

                                                             ,'^ sy
                                                                                                           \                  a .oo             ,
                                                                                                                              "                                                   ./
                                                                          '\                                                                   /             s..
                                                                                      v *
                                                                                                             \

5 sw

                                              ,/                                                               \                                                             ,

s \ 'i

                                        /                                          \                              T                                                                                        \
                                     /
                                                                                                                    \                                                '

U?

                                                                    $$                \
                           /

l

x y p-y-x l n Q

                                                                                                                                                                                            ,/
                         /                                        \                               s
                                                                                                    , Zb;;                                                                           ,-
                                                                                                                                                          .x = xy
                                                                                      ,,              . ..                                   .           ~ =
                                                                             'y               f'- "p                                                                                             .g
                      /                              .g                                 .
                                                                                                                                                               'N                                usa l                               . r;;
                                                                              /

iN s, . , x- .. ,.

                                                                                                .e                           ,.

t.

                    ,                                                                                          Y'                                         x ,              :.
                                                                                 ,,    / N,l,
                                                                                                               ,'Y v (.- s ,_             ...' N_'y% , .

N ~. / c/ 2 //.x.

                                                                                       'a                                                               -        ,
                                                                         'tN
                                                                                                        /,!,/'      ~                      -l                 /          '\

{ r.,,i ( jj:p.lm

                                                                                           !.                                                  1 n
                                                                                                                                                             - 1.r '  a
                                                                                                                                                                                ..a E

w , Z,. ! n ww ra f a.. .m,. . r,j, ,p ' i, 7; 1A. r\ n ,ug ,. As PL3 ,/ *l ) { .g ' 3 .. 5' 10 [ q;; \ i: -s

                                                                                                                                                           $ / ~'N
                                                                                                                                                                            ?.

g '\(xu '\l, ~Yl ?> \_ 1/. / s 3.o

                       \                                                                                      +>                                                                                  ..

s Y r,,; NN 5 ,i N

'\

( s 4 ,

, w>

em

                                                                                                                                                             /
                                                                                                                                                                /                             x N 'N
                              ,                                ,                              N .:     x                !
                                                                                                                                 ,i5 g   /,         4 N

s s

                                                                          .~                                 N_                            .V                      N
                                                                          *E.                                                                                           \
                                             /                                                                                                                            \             .e w                 -

l

,/,

, ,\

                                                                                             .so                    I                                        .?

j R ,- di r.2 N l l N /

                                                                                                                                    "/I           ,                                  \
                                                                                                                                     +"

l \ N e I

                                                                                                                /                                  \'

l

                                                                      'i.                                    /

x 1 N x/ s ' (Refer to Tables 2.2-2B, ! 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8) i 1 Figure 2.2-78 1990 RESIDEt4T At4D TRAtlSIEtiT POPULATIO!1 DISTRIBUTI0ft, 0 TO 10 MILES. l l I r 2.2-52

Amend. X Dec. 1981 x,

 's )

m Legend:

? -

0-lMILE Resident Population I, , ' /, f Resident Equivalent

        ,.           4'          l'   c                                                                                  Population S/           \                                                        ".                            Total Population
                               =
              ,, e.s I. 00 va                 *                  ..

r. rin

                /\                                                               ,                                 5'3
              /
                                                                            \-l                     /
                                                  , .v                 m8        ,      +
                                                                                           /e              ,               .-
                                                           /q                \:4l,i 'i                 /                   M

[ E 2h+y pM/4)b i g/4dak

                                                                                       ,"'  1~

g m - ; ... T

                                                                                         -     ~
                                                                                               ^      a v.:

E

                                           .n.        .,.       n g                        10 t

v . ,, -

                                                                                      ; N di
                                                  .      n /::                 it \;si" l                                               .+,                  sa           ,

3. .:.

! g,

                          ""                           ' ; , ' ; / ; \ ". gr.\ri x                                          ...
                                    ,/' ; R, / 3 \ 1                                                ;
                             /                                i E. / '" \;
                        /               m m           ,/                                                         . , . -
                                                    /

a n.,oe

                                            /              .M                  ,,,,          de
                                          /                                    M
                                      /

s (Refer to Tables 2.2-2C, 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8) Figure 2.2-7C 2000 RESIDEtiT AtlD TRAtlSIErlT POPULATION DISTRIBUTIO!!, 'O 0 T0 10 f!ILES. l l 2.2-53

Amend. X Dec. 1981 i.egend: s 0-t MILE Resident Population

                /I.                    /                                                                                                                                               P,esidcat Equivalent i             k p-   / / ..<
        %                                            ,                                                                                                                                        Population I                  '!                                                                                "o Total Population
             ~. . f. : ,Ne/.. 'v R
                                                                         'y[i
                    'V' ; . \                  /             '
                                                                     /
                                                                                                       \

s 7\ -

                                                                                                                                                                                            'N f

y ..+ i'C

                                       ,                         'N                  .n                       \                                                 ,x
                               /
                                  ,/                                 \              im                         \
                                                                                                                 \

rm j'

                                                                                                                                                                              /
                                                                                                                  \
                           /

l. S OC SW

                     /
                      ,/\                            U2                                                                          ,

5 /

                                     's                                                          -                    i
                                                                                                                                          / N                                                     p
                   /                          x N                                 /\

N/ + s If 'N'N

                                                                                         \c/ \ j:-

f f r*7

               /                                     'N                          '                              f
                                                                                                                                                                                          /
                                    , ,q.;                         sg'e,/\jh
                                                                                                                                   ~
                                                                                                                                                                   .- h/'g v..                                        's                                                .

N* *]?.

                                                                                                                                                                                  \
                                                                                                                                                      . N . .N' i,.

j,/?> j',/

                                                                                        ,' 0 f. ..

i l .L \ ,

/'

l

                                            '~ L Q ' / '] hls ty'r % 'l D: . ,, T . f -

j .~y,,gy.,c t o - t.,., o a

                                  .+                                                  , .                                                                                    I.

w

                              .i'"'u                             (         ,-         t                                                                               ...

1 * *m

>~

c x,6 rs t

                                                                ;y ' is l a.M                                                                                               j n.3
                                                                                                                                                                                                       .a e                               ,)                                                                             10 s,1      f~f%
                                                                 \                        m

( .H

                                                                    \,. .\ \" /,g(i
                                                                       =
                                                                                        \ p.'NG                r.y, 7j    a: +,,6; J , -
                                                                                                                                                              /7             ,,,

a,.,, N' ea \ 'N . 'a t u i .. s f>/ .o v.' ,-

        \                              * *d                             '\ , ,,                                               "                                                /
         \                            ~

s c., 'N ,, N' hb

                \                                                                    ~

7; ; .. .sj' co , ,,, / ~

                                                                                          'd                          , 'N
                       \ -

x

                                                                                                                                                                                                  's y

s. I 1

s

                                                                                                                                                                                        ._                s s                                                                                                                 (                            N             m
                             \                                                                                 /.j                            g s
                                 'x                                  /              _'n
                                                                                                             !                                  \
                                                                                                                                                            ..w 7 ;y, N

x

                                        '                                                                   /                 ,,
                                                                                                                                                 \

l ,',i x s

                                                   'N    i i

I

                                                                                                                                                   \
                                                                                                                                                    \

x.

                                                                                                                                                                                         \/
                                                                                                                                                                                              /

N i

l

                                                                  's
                                                                        '~

x

                                                                                                    /                                                '\                           /

1 l / \ N'I~ s

'\

(Refer to Tables 2.2-2D, 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8) Figure 2.2-7D 2010 RESIDEtlT AND TRANSIErlT POPULATI0tt DISTRIBUTI0ft, 0 TO 10 ftILES. l 1 2.2-54

Amend. X Dec. 1981 [m\ I V = Legend: x 0-t MILE Resident Population w i 5 Resident Equivalent

         .; +                                        n,                  .
                                                                                         .c                                                                                                                                                                                                           Population
              ,                                                                                                                                                                                                                            n 2                                                                                                                                                                  ^

a " u

                                                                       .                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Total Population
                  '.5 _

m m *"' (

f

Hll ,/ ! .* *

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           .x
                                                                \
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   .co      ( i.

t

                                                                                                                                                                                                                               \        <

H

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ./
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             ,i a                      'N .ie.:,                     \
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      .q a

i i

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               / .:                        , i, sq                                                                                                                 .i                                           m                5                                  m                         ,,,,

no ..

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ,/ , ,. ',/           ;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   /
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      .m..t.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        \ .1 E

hh.\a.,f/+N i

       .                                             .....                                                            y;                                      '=

5 m - "* gg o . = , . . . +, ,j ~ .4'. u,_ji

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             .        s.                  ,,,

c M. a- n 1 w\ s~5

0

                                                                                                                                                                        'l .                                       /                                                       ',7
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              /.o /                  3
                                                                                                                                 '?.                                           /                                   Is ,i                                   ?

b

                                                                                                                                                          /                                      Tw .-. ' is / .aI \" \ il                                   s W                                                 /                                                                                                     /                                            \,'4,                                  .....

rss

                                                                                           ,/                                                                        Q                                                 I.~                          ' .;                   n'a l' .g
             \                                                           /                                                                                                                                           a                         ,

o a

1I a oo \p,,m,-

                                                                                                    .hd                                                       /
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         *..soo z                                           -
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          /                                                     \

x ,' .e i . . . m

iii

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       \.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        \                                \

s N. \ 1 s (Refer to Tables 2.2-2E, 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8) Figure 2.2-7E 2020 RESIDENT AND TRANSIENT POPULATION DISTRIBUTION,

     )                                                                                                 0 T0 10 MILES.

2.2-55 l l

Amend. X Dec. 1981 Legend: w i / o.iMILE 0

                                /                                                                                                                                         Resident Population
                  \lCx                                                                                                                                                     Resident Equivalent
          = = '// *( % !,

TI Population n /,7, '/ \ ,! Total Population us ! .\

                               \       'V i
                                                        /
                                                           ,/
                                                                 / f -.                  \

s \ f

                                             '/ \
                                      ,/                                                               '?

f

                                                       \               ..                      \                                                ,,
                               /                                         2                      \
                         /                                \                                                                                   .m
                                                                                                                                                            /-,/
                       /                       . no
                                                                \                                \                        .
                 /'Ns
                                               *                                                                       /                                                          ..
               )                                                  'N [h

s -

                                                                      ,/ \ nf

i ,,

                                                                                                                                   ?T        .
                                                                                                                                                                                 ,/
                                                                                                                                                                                       /
                                                                                                                                                                                              /
                                                                //',.         ' / .e                     31
                               , , to
                                                              ,/ n j/
                                                                             /
                                                                                     \

4'I I

                                                                                                                           .                       ._i, N l#
                                                                                                                                                            \/

i dU f 'x ,e' 5 C

                                                                             ; >' a ( - l ,

i \/0 t'e x ;l~ , . , ,/. y+ p. , l o

                                                                         ,u2
                                                                                                                   ..'_\g
                                                                                                                                      ./ \

im !

                                                               >        h c, .               .

w

                          . ',ll                    ! su
                                                                  ,o c-
                                                                        ! .,o       i ..s -                               .L.*i!                     ,%      .a g y l -L                                                c l .*                ?.i     54 *                                .,o                c f Ml 4T 0\ .

ys

                                                                                                                                                      ~                                         '

10 f i[ . s ) sa>sx- / 7 - N .,. lI? s ,e -'

                                                                                                   ,,                            ,o      / s     s          a
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 /
                                 "                         ,     ,o N , um                                                                                                             '}*
            \                                                                                                                                   ,,
                                                                                                                                                           /

s

                                                               'V                                                ..                                                                         ....

s a N r ,, ,to s

                                                                  'x                                                                                                N
                                                                                                                                             \/4/
                                                                                                        ~

y 9 ,,, N

s -

                                                                          'Q ~j 7                         ,       \                              \                                       'x x
                   \      /                       s;                                             /                  \

s q=

/,

f \ s N/

                                                                                                                                                                         .<,,.o, s

s /

                             's u,                    /                                            o*                                                         /
                                                       /                                   '                                                                  y
                                                                                                        .g
                                                                                                                       \

i @ s' , N x; I \ s xx / \ s x j i

                                                           %-_s                  ,
                                                                 'NQ                                    s
                                                                                                                                 \

(Refer to 1 Tables 2.2-2F, I 2.2-5, 2.2-7, i and 2.2-8) j i Figure 2.2-7F 2030 RESIDEtlT AtlD TRAtlSIEtlT POPULATI0tl DISTRIBUT10ti, O TO 10 MILES. 2.2-56

Amend. X Dec. 1981 [ \ k-N 50

                                                                       ?000 S,000                     40 6,400
                                                                                         'I'0

5,600 7,900 3g 2,200

3.900 6.300 20 it,g o o 4,500 2.100 3,800

                                                                        **      9.100                            ,

SD 3,100

                                                          -                0                        ,on,,og 22.100
                                                                            '                                                                 E i 34.400       102,600          34.600       21,300 W  4,800     11,100         2.600        12,300
                                                                                                                                                    10

'(

~.

s, 5,000 3.400 2m

                                                                            \         S.300 6,500                                 3,300 5,600 5,200 7.200                           3.600                                          6,300 11.200                   2,400 7,200                              3,700 6.000 2,300 10.S 0 0                 22."00 6.200 6,500 5,500 S

(Refer to Tables 2.2-3A, 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8) (j Figure 2.2-8A 1930 RESIDENT POPULATION DISTRIBUTION, 10 TO 50 f1ILES. 2.2-57

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O N SO 7.soo 3.900 40 4.70 0

                                                                                                              .900                 4. N 4,300 0

3.30 0 , 4.700

                                                                           .500 1,900 63.200 3.700 3.600           9.500 /                         41.200 3.700 2.20o                                         10                        ii3,soo I800                                      #9.70 0 1.800             11,900           l                           31,200         116.600        28,900      20,200 g     4.300          18.900                                                              ,

7.300 4.200 4.600 2.1 @ S.00 0 3.400 5,300 S400 S.300 S.400 2.900 7g 12.200 9 400 2.600 S.400 2.40o i2.400 3o.000 3,,og 4.900 I so.20o ,,,,, 4.800 I (Refer to Tables 2.2-3B, l 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8) Figure 2.2-8B 1990 RESIDEllT POPULATION DISTRIBUTI0ft,10 TO 50 f!ILES. 2.2-58

Amend. X Dec. 1981

, ~x

_) N 50 8.100 3.800 40 4.600 5,800 19.700 7.800 30 1, 0 3,300 4,500 20 14,000 f,900 3.800

                                                                      '                                   43.100 3,600                                                       '

2.700 10 I20,500 2,200

                                              '                                    20,700 32,500         I22,800        29,500     ff.300 i,700         11,000 W 4,500     20,700 7.S00 3,0w                                                                                            10 f>,

'w) 4.100 4,700 I,900 5,000 3,500 S.300 5.000 5,600 S.500 3.000 4,700 12,700 1,900 10,000 2,50 0 S.800 12.300 38,400 2.900 4,800

6.100 4.600 s

(Refer to Tables 2.2-3C, 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8) 7- s b Figure 2.2-8C 2000 RESIDENT POPULATION DISTRIBUTIO?l,10 TO 50 MILES. 2.2-59

Amend. X Dec. 1981

0 50 - 8.200 3,700 40 4,400 0,l00 5,300 4,200 g I. 0 3.300 4,200 11,600 t,8% 14,400 3,700 3,50 0 2,i00 2.100

                                                          \,0           /
                                                                          /25,900 i22.000 43,700 20A00 E

1,600 124 000 29.500 21,700 W 4,600 21,300 9,800 l 32.600 2.700 4,100 4,700 i.7 10 4,900

                                                                                                             . O 3.300 5,80 0 4,900
    \                                                                                                                5,70 0 5,500                        2 900                                              gg 12,800 10,200         I.MO                     2,400 5,900 12,800         ,       32.400                                                            2.400 4,600 11,400 6,000 l

4,500 S (Refer to Tables 2.2-3D, 2.2-5, 2.2-7. and 2.2-8) Figure 2.2-8D 2010 RESIDE!!T POPULATION DISTRIBUTION, 10 TO 50 f1ILES. 2.2-60

Amend. X Dec. 1981

  ,ry k .,s' N

50 8.400 3,700 40 4,300 4, t OO 8,200 3o 3,300 4,000 l g, goo

                                                \.300

84.900 3.80 10,8 m 700 . no 3 ,3g 26.200 2,100 10 i24,100 E000 21.000 C.N M.E U. M W 4,700 22 3 i,6M W SM00 7,600 73 2
10

  's _/                            4.000                                          4,700 5,500 4.900                                3.300 5,200 4.300 5,600                      2,900                                              4,7%

12,800 1,800 tO. W 2.400 6.I00 1 12,700 32.900 2,500 4.300

                                          *\.70o                                             ,,,,

4,300 S (Refer to Tables 2.2-3E, 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8)

 ,O i ,/      Figure 2.2-8E 2020 RESIDEf1T POPULATI0tl DISTRIBUTION,10 TO 50 MILES.

2.2-61

i Amend. X Dec. 1981 N O 50 s.300 3,300 40 [ 3,800

                                                                                , O                    W 3,700 7900                                            30 3,0 00
                                                                      3,90o t.200 12,700 t,600                                                                            M +M 3,200 3,10 0 27,200 1,900     /                                                 127,700 5,500                             22,100

[ l I E 4 400 T' 3*'00 '2 7* ' O #

0 0 # #'800 W 25.'00 8.300 7,700 t

                        \'                  2.w
                                                     \           'h           r. ,x 10 3,600                                       4,600 3

4.400 3.100 4,900 4.600 5,100 2,700 4,500 i 12,600 11,000 M 2 ,10 0 S, goo 13,300 33,200 2,000

3,700 88,700 3,400 9 00 S

l (Refer to l Tables 2.2-3F, 2.2-5, 2.2-7, and 2.2-8) Figure 2.2-8F 2030 RESIDEtlT POPULATIOri DISTRIBUTI0fi, l') TO 50 f1ILES. 2.2-62

Amend. X Dec. 1981 h,, N

                                                    -               I NNW                                           NNE og Ja

OAK

                                                               /,-                         RfDGE

in NE NW '
68 9 p- B II I

                                         . pt2                                                     '                       NE SYRRIMAN Q

se q 35 ss -3,

                              ..f-eao co wW
                                                                                     ^9     Hb C                          _

75 KINGSTON

                                                         ,                                                                        k O

83 4

l 0 l WSW g
82 ESE

                    ~
                                     #+,,4,                           ,

l e7 l 5g g6

                                                .g t..          e                     '                                  '

75 Ld IR

                                            .                                                     city 3,       SE

{ SSE O , , , 5 fl\ " ' E SCHOOL NUMBERS ARE KEYED TO TABLE 2.2-11 ( Figure 2 2-9 SCHOOLS WITHIN 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE CRBRP SITE. O 2.2-63

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O N I NNW NNE

                                                                         . OAK NE
                                                <  61 s           n Y-It WNW                          .                                                      s                        NE H ARRIM AN                                          omeer                          3[
                          .. g W -

m- g \-

                                                               *N          +

WELTON

                                                                              "'et cau E

58 75

           .. g KINGSTCN                                                                                             10 lif               '

WSw , ESE

               !!!3 :

re ,+r , s . ee 1

                                             +
                                             e,                  ,

75 SW cry SE o 5 SSE I I I SSW /l y s e INDUSTRIAL PLANTS A PROPOSED KOPPERS LIQUEFACTION PROJECT Figure 2.2-10 INDUSTRIAL PLAT 1TS WITHIN 10-MILE RADIUS OF THE CRBRP SITE. 2.2-64

Amend. X Dec. 1981 N NNW NNE s OAK s MORGAN ' k RIDGE COUNTY NW j \ NE v- 61 ROANE COUNT \ ANDERSON COUNTY

                                                                                                                     $. 95 go-WNW j
                                                                                                                       ~

g+ g ' p[ ENE N'HARRI M AN p +4 IE - KNOX euncH 8 'V f+ , COUNTY W - I *

                                                                                                                                ~
                                                                                                                                         "EA" E

75 10 KINGSTON 7 ROANE COUNTY WSW ! ESE

                       .....#                                                                                                                                              II Sk;t... #++,                                                                                      -

s, / LOUDON COUNTY

                                                                                            %g SW                                      %!!                              ..                                                        $hR              SE

(~ ~ . r. SSW , SSE

: : I SCALE OF MILES O Figure 2.2-11 CRBRP SITE MAJOR HIGHWAYS.

2.2-65 i

Amend. X Dec. 1931 O N I NNW NNE R GE

                                                                                        \N NE NW                                                          \,
                              .              61
              #'                       s                                         s 2
                                '8                                                  \

WNW f s NE a7 HARRIMAN 1,} - UNM W - y

N+ wrIo !E

      ,    (            4 KI5GSTON
                                       , , se

[ 10 tS I WSw lji ,\ ESE II 5:: ' !)' ' #( -

                   .. .          #e                            *
                                      ./ h SW        v         .

LE7 C R 'y' SE SSw g i SSE o 5 S bcALE OF MILES

PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY l NUMBERS ARE KEYED TO TABLE 2.2-14 1

l Figure 2.2-12 PUBLIC UATER SUPPLIES WITHIN 10-f11LE RADIUS OF THE O

CRBRP SITE.

2.2-66

Amend. X Dec. 1931 /h (,_/ N NNW NNE R GE NW ,

                                       - 61 s

WNW

                            ,                           .                   \     s                  NE
                           'f                             l HARRIMAN s                                                         '

3 2 t W - + HM M - E C's xisGSTON v ' 10 ESE WSW .

                           ...,.. et 75      LEN R SW         f                     .

C SE SSW SSE o 5

                                                   /l                                            ,    ,

S SCALE OF MILES aINDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY NUMBERS ARE KEYED TO TABLE 2.2-15 Figure 2.2-13 INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLIES WITHIN 10-MILE RADIUS OF CRBRP SITE. 2.2-67

2.3 REGIONAL HISTORICAL, SCENIC, CULTURAL AND NATURAL LANDMARKS O The following discussion of features or landmarks, particularly of those located on the Site, has been separated into three sub-sections; (1) scenic and natural; (2) historical; and (3) archaeological. Histori-cal features include those structures or sites that are of Euro-American origin. Indian burial mounds and middens are examples of prehistoric or archaeological sites. In Figure 2.3-1, archaeological sites have been designated by triangles and historical sites by circles; one exception is the Hensley Cemetery which has been designated by a square. Each site has a " key" number which has been assigned in accordance with the Smithsonian Trinomial Site Designation System used throughout the United States. In this system, the first number or numbers indicate the state (numbered alpha-betically), the letters indicate the county in that state and the final number or numbers indicate the sequential recording of the sites dis-covered in that county. For example, 40RE123 means this site is located in the state of Tennessee (40), Roane County (RE) and is the 123rd site to be discovered and recorded in Roane County. Thus, when a new site is discovered, it is assigned a " key" number and recorded in county, state and national registers. 2.3.1 SCENIC AND NATURAL LANDMARKS Steep limestone ridges, hills and knobs are characteristic features of the region. Numerous small wet-weather streams drain the area and in many places along the river, thick alluvial sediments form flood plains which vary in width from a few feet to several hundred feet. The plant site and the surrounding area are heavily wooded witn both coniferous and deciduous trees. A combination of various vines, grasses, shrubs and trees forms a dense ground cover. O 2.3-1

m t O O O t i ) TABLE 2.5-10a 1 CHEMICAL WATER QUALITY DATA - WHITE 0AK DAM 1979 (23a', l10 Number of Concentration, mg/l % Substance Samples Maximum Minimum Average Std.* Std. Cr 11 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.05 <10 9 Zn 11 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.01 <20 NO3 (N) 11 .3 0.2 2.7 1 0.8 10 27

Hg 12 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.005 <20 m

m

Tennessee Stream Guidelines.

NOTE: Location W-1, Figure 2.5-10a i I l E b" PS F

AMEliD. IX OCT. 1981 TABLE 2.5-11

SUMMARY

OF DISCHARGE-WEIGHTED MEAN VALUES

OF STABLE CHEMICAL ANALYSES **

OF CLINCH RIVER WATER l9 WHITE 0AK DAM WOD + Bicarbonate 125.000 Calcium 32.000 Magnesium 6.000 Chloride 5.100 Sulfate 23.000 fli trate 8.200 Iron 0.080 Phosphate 0.600 Potassium 1.600 Sodium 1.400 Silicon 1.700 Specific Conductance 283.000 Strontium 0.065 Discharge ++ 14.000

Concentrations in mg/ liter, except pH in pH units, specific conductance in micrombos/cm, and discharge in cfs

  ** Chemical analyses perfonned on filtered samples
   + Sample period, Noverrber 18, 1961 to November 30, 1963 at White Oak Dam
  ++

Time-weighted mean for the total sampling period O 2.5-32

I O O O l 1200 - ) :( -- l150 - l

ll00 -

I i 1050 - C ' i d 1000 - . E N P i 950 -

  $        d                                                                                       3 61' 900   -

890 - CENTER OF I97 880 - CONTAINMENT 870 - BUILDING 860 - SENSOR 850 - LOCATION 840 -

METEORLOGICAL 3' 820 8iO - TOWER \ - - ~ ~ - 800 - 790 - 780 - 770 - og

                                                                                                                            $ co 760     -

750 - ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; g, 740 w.

                            -800   -400 0       400    800   I200   1600 2000      2400        2800 3200     3600 4000  l10 8x DISTANCE FROM CENTER OF CONTAINMENT BUILDING (FEET)

Figure 2.6-17 TOP 0 GRAPHICAL CROSS SECTION INCLUDING METEOROLOGICAL TOWER AND CENTER OF CONTAINMENT BUILDING

O O , INTENTIONALLY BLANK 1 0

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O material, detritus and bottom materials. Benthic macroinvertebrates comprised the largest group of food items. Eighteen species of chironomids were recovered along with several other aquatic insects. This diet, consisting of many different food items, is characteristic of carp feeding habits.(75) Similar results occurred in a food habit study of I carp in five Oklahoma reservoirs.(93) Stomach-contents included: organic 6 and inorganic matter, animal fragments, Ceratopogonidae, caddisflies,

,   pelecypods, Chaoborus, chironomids, entomostraca, seeds, plant fragments and algae.

Stomachs of ten smallmouth buffalo were analyzed and eight were found to 6 contain food items. The food items recovered are similar to those found in the carp. As in the carp, benthic macroinvertebrates comprise the majority of the diet. These fish feed mostly on bottom organisms, copepods, cladocerans, mollusks, chironomids, ostracoda and algae.(75,94,95) i Data from the stomach content analyses showed the variety of organisms comprising the diets of the seven fish species studied. Most species of organisms recovered from the fish stomachs were represented in plankten and benthic collections taken in the same areas where fish were sampled. Table 2.7-100 presents a classification of all fish species collected in 10 the Clinch River during the baseline survey. Divisions of fish based upon food habits include the following groups: planktivores, bottom feeders, insectivores and piscivores.(96) Planktivores composed the most numerous group in our study. This shows a heavy dependency of the fish community on plankton drifting downstream from the Melton Hill Reser-voi r. (96) Threadfin shad, emerald shiner and gizzard shad were the most 6 ! abundant species of planktivores collected in the Clinch River. In general, most of the cottom feeders are omnivorous. However, some sub-

groups such as the smallmouth buffalo and redhorse can be classified as selective feeders and tend toward a diet of mollusks.(70,97) Insects and other invertebrates compose the diet of insectivores. Most numerous i

species within this group is the important game fish, the bluegill. i 2.7-87d I

AMENDf1ENT VI April 1976 Skipjack herring, spotted bass, largemouth bass, sauger and white bass, O as important species of piscivores, feed primarily on fish but also con- 6 sume insects, crustaceans, and other invertebrates. 2.7.2.4.10 AQUATIC FOOD WEB RELATIONSHIPS An aquatic food web, based on the feeding relationships of species in the Clinch River, indicates the way that the major components of the ecosystem, as discussed in the preceding sections, are interrelated. The Clinch River in the area of the Site is different than unregulated river systems because operation of the dams above and below the Site cause daily flows to vary between river and lake conditions. Species interactions are based on the communities at the Site and the input of species from the upstream reservoir. A river is an open system which receives much of its energy input in the form of organic matter, produced outside the river and carried into the l system by running water. The importance of this allochthonous energy source (detritus, leaves and bacteria) is demonstrated by the abundance of detritus feeding invertebrates in the study area. Though primary pro- 6 i duction in a river is not normally dependent on phytoplankton (Stober, 1963)(98) , in the area of the Site where both river and lake conditions may occur, phytoplankton may provide additional biomass for planktivorous fish and filter feeding invertebrates. Importance of phytoplankton is l dependent on the abundance and size of the species which have been discussed in Section 2.7.2.4.2. Depth of the Clinch River probably reduces l the importance of periphyton as a primary producer. Survey of the macrophyte population indicates that its contribution to the primary production at the Site is minimal. l Primary consumers feed on the products of the primary producers. These consumers include zooplankton and benthic invertebrate species. Clinch . River zooplankton populations have been characterized in Section 2.7.2.4.3

2. 7-87e l

Amend. X Dec. 1981 g b 3.2 REACTOR AND STEAM-ELECTRIC SYSTEM 3.2.1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP) will utilize a Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor in the Nuclear Steam Supply System designed by West-inghouse Electric Corporation as the lead reactor manufacturer under con-tracts to the Project Management Corporaticn (PMC) and the Department of Energy (D0E). DOE will provide technical super- 10 4 vision and administration of the Nuclear Island aspects of the Westing-house activities. Atomics International and General Electric are partici-pating as major sub-contractors in the Nuclear Steam Supply System design. Assignment of responsibilities for the Nuclear Island can be identified as follows: Westinghouse is responsible for the overall Nuclear Island, (] Reactor System and Primary Heat Transport System; General Electric is

   \d responsible for the Intermediate Heat Transport System and Steam Gener-ator Systems; and Atomics International is responsible for the Fuel Handling System, maintenance and auxiliary systems. Burns and Roe, Inc.

is the architect-engineer for the project. Stone and Webster is the con- 6 structor. Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) will operate the plant and will use the generated electrical power in the TVA system. General Electric is providing the Turbine Generator. The CRBRP will be an integrated single-unit electric power plant and will include: (a) a liquid sodium cooled reactor and steam generation system; (b) a steam turbine-driven electric generation system; (c) a heat rejec-tion system; (d) an electrical switchyard; and (e) related auxiliaries and supporting structures and facilities. Three parallel primary and intemediate heat transport loops will be used in the Heat Transport System (HTS). The primary loops will be located 6 f] in an inert atmosphere in shielded vaults within a containment structure. l Sodium coolant in the primary loops will remove heat from the reactor core 3.2-1

Ai1ENDf1ENT VIII February 1977 and the radial blanket. As a result of neutron activation, the primary sodium will become radioactive. The primary sodium will also contain dissolved radioactive fission and corrosion products. Heat from the pri-mary sodium is transferred to the three intermediate loops through the Intermediate Heat Exchangers (IHX). In the IHX the operating pressure of the Intermediate Heat Transport Loop is slightly higher than that in the primary loop. As a result, leakage of radioactive primary sodium into the intermediate system is minimized and the intennediate loop is main-tained in a non-radioactive state. Non-radioactive sodium in the inter-mediate loops circulates through the evaporators of the Steam Generation System and converts feedwater on the water side into steam. This steam 6 is then superheated in the Stcam Generator System superheaters to drive the tandem-compound turbine. A single-shaft , multi-stage turbine gene-rator, which will produce 380 MWe with steam conditions of 1,450 psig at 900 degrees F, is used to produce electricity. The generator delivers 22 to 24 kV at a 0.9 power factor to a step-up transfonner which delivers 161 kV to the TVA network. Condensation of the steam is accomplished in a single-pass condenser. Condenser heat load is dissipated to the atmosphere by a multi-cell cooling tower. The Heat Dissipation System is described in detail in Section 3.4. Deaeration of the condensate is accomplished in the feed-water cycle deaerator and the main condenser. A schematic diagram of the CRBRP cycle is shown in Figure 3.2-1. I Physical containment and shielding will be provided throuahout the plant l for nomal operation and as required for accident prevention. Maj or ( components of the Primary Heat Transport System and the reactor vessel will be located in an inert atmosphere in reinforce-concrete cells within the Reactor Containment Building (RCB). The RCB will be a leak-tight steel shell structure aboveground with a flat, steel-lined concrete base below grade. The steel shell of the Reactor Containment Building 8 will be completely enclosed by a reinforced concrete confinement structure. O 3.2-2

                                                         'Am:ndment X December, 1981 3.5    RADWASTE SYSTEM 3.5.1    LIQUID RADWASTE SYSTEM The Liquid Radwaste System is designed to procesc contaminant liquids from the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP)' prior to reuse or release into the environment. The basic approach is to process liquid radwaste so that essentially all of the            8 activity is contained in solid material, to load all solid radioactive material into containers that meet the Department of Transportation (DOT) and other appropriate regulations and to transfer the containers to a licensed contractor for processing      8 10 and burial.

3.5.1.1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The Liquid Radwaste System is designed to decontaminate liquids 10

by filtration, evaporation and demineralization. Evaporator bottoms, which contain essentially all of the radioactivity, will be transferred to the solid radwaste system for solidification 10 and processing along with spent filter cartridges and resin. Processing of solid radwastes is described in detail in Section 3.5.3. I ! A flow diagram for the Liquid Radwaste System is shown in Figure 3.5.1. The system consists of two subsystems. The first subsystem is designed to process liquids with intermediate levels of radioactivity that are reused after decontamination, and the second subsystem is designed to process liquids with low levels f ' of radioactivity that are released, after decontamination, into a ' dilution stream. Decontamination of liquids with intermediate or low level activities is carried out in the following sequence: i liquids are collected and then processed through one or more () cycles of filtration, evaporation and demineralization. Condensate from an evaporator is pumped to a storage or monitoring tank prior to reuse or discharge. The first cycle l i 3.5-1

Am:ndment X D ccmber, 1981 through the evaporator and demineralizer results in a d2 contamination factor (DF) of 105, except for iodine and tritium 10 where the decontamination factors are 10 4 and 1, respectively. The concentrated liquid radwaste will be collected from the bottom of the evaporators and transferred to the solid radwaste cystem for solidification and ultimate disposal. These internediate and low level liquid process subsystem are described 8 in more detail in Sections 3.5.1.2 and 3.5.1.3, respectively. 3.5.1.2 INTERMEDIATE ACTIVITY LEVEL LIQUID PROCESS SYSTEM The intermediate activity level liquid (IALL) subsystem collects and processes effluents from the Large Component Cleaning Vessel 10 (LCCV) and the Small Component Cleaning Autoclave (SCA). Liquids 6 are pumped from the cleaning cells to collection tanks located in the radwaste building. The cleaning process in the LCCV consists of a moist nitrogen treatment followed by multiple rinses. The moist nitrogen and water rinse treatments essentially remove the llh residual sodium on components from the primary and secondary sodium systems. The LCCV can also perform an acid 10 8 decontamination etch of selected components. Decontamination of a Primary Heat Transport System pump is the principal anticipated use of the acid etch and is only expected three times in the life of the plant. Table 3.5-1 shows the design annual concentration 6 of activities by isotope flowing into the IALL System. The criteria for these isotopes are contained in the footnotes on Table 3.5-1. Column 4 of Table 3.5-1 identifies the average i activities in the sodium cleaning rinse of the cleaning process. The calculation is based on the removal of 100 percent of the average annual activity in the sodium and 10 percent of the 10 average annual fission and corrosion products plated on the components in a total of 100,000 gallons of water per year. The last column shows the activity concentration in the acid etch solutions collected in the IALL system. This calculation is based on removal of the remaining 90 percent of the deposited h activity in an acid etch batch volume of 16,000 gallons. Such an 3.5-2 j

Amendment X December, 1981 acid etch batch is expected only about three times in~.the life.of i10 4 the plant. Expected activity concentration levels in.the LCCV I outflow have been made utilizing models which compute the fission and corrosion,' tritium, and transuranium specific activities in the sodium that is deposited on the exposed surfaces in the primary system. Expected concentrations have been estimated from the number of components to be cleaned, their surface area, the i quantity of sodium on each component and the volume of fluid used r to clean each component. Tritium is the predominant radioactive i- isotope in the sodium attached to the components from the Intermediate Heat Transpot;t System. Supplemental discussion of 8 the subsystem is provided in Section 10.7. [ ol0 While in the collection tanks, the pH of the liquid radwaste is 10 adjusted during recirculation by the injection of a caustic or an } acid solution. Neutralized liquid radwaste is then passed n through a-filter, fed to the evaporator for distillation, and b then to a dem3fneralizer for polishing.

1 Liquids, primarily consisting of water radwaste, are stored in two 20,000. gallon' tanks prior to distillation in the evaporators.

l Concentrated ~uastes generated during the evaporation process are discharged from the evaporators into the concentrated waste tank. i Collected fluids are sampled for radioactivity, nuclide identity

! and chemical purity. Sampling analysis results will determine 10 1 . l whether the fluids are adequately decontaminated and suitable for reuse or discharge. Batches exceeding purity limits will be recycled through the evaporators or demineralizers. Ordinarily, 1 there will be no discharges of the water distillate from the intermediate activity radwaste system to the environment. ' e 10 However, if the system should contain a surplus inventory, the design allows.for controlled discharge into a diluting stream. i Activities accumulated in the water storage or monitoring tanks, under the assumption that the process water has been decontaminated by a factor of 10 5 (except as noted in Section 10 3.5.1.1) for one cycle of evaporation and demineralization, are S W [ 3.5-3

Amendment X December, 1981 shown in Table 3.5-2. Both the intermediate and low level systems inventories in the process streams are shown in this table. The table has added conservatism in its values since no credit is taken for decay due to collection, processing and hold-up. Table 3.5-3 shows the concentration of activities by nuclides in 10 the diluting stream for both systems. The assumptions used in developing this information are identified in the table 0 10 footnotes. The released activity is diluted by the cooling tower blowdown, at an annual average of flow rate of 3.1 x 10 12 cc/yr. 8 In all cases, if a batch of liquid in a storage tank fails to meet the purity requirements for reuse or discharge, the batch will be recycled to a collection tank and reprocessed until it meets acceptable standards for reuse or discharge. Water will only be discharged from the storage tank to the effluent stream 8 if reuse is not practical and then only after sampling and analysis are complete and show that the discharge meets regulatory standards. Concentrated evaporator bottoms are discharged from the evaporator into a collection tank. The concentrate wil.1 be sampled for radioactivity and monitored volumes will be transferred to the solid radwaste system for solidification in l cement and processing and shipment to a licensed burial site for ultimate disposal. 10 l Adequate shielding is provided by the walls of the cells which 10 house the filters, collection tanks, evaporators, concentrated waste tank, decanting tanks, and the solidification drumming station, (based on the worst case input stream) to maintain personnel exposures as low as reasonably achievable. o Radiation levels in the areas housing the filters and demineralizers will be monitored. Removal and replacement of the 10 lh filter cartridges and resins will be controlled by the area radiation L 3.5-4

Amandment X December, 1981 level, pressure drop and conductivity (for resin) . Filter

;         cartridges and resins that are removed will be transferred to the            10 i         solid raswaste system for processing and ultimate disposal,
,         3.5.1.3   LOW ACTIVITY LEVEL LIQUID RADWASTE SYSTEM This subsystem is used to collect and process the liquid,

primarily water, effluents from the floor drains, personnel-decontamination shower drains and laboratory drains located n 10 the Plant and Reactor Service Buildings. Concentration of 8-

! activity in the effluents from these sources is expected to be less than 10-4 j/ Ci/cc. Input isotopic concentrations to collection tanks are shown in Table 3.5-1. Low activity concentrations are computed by assuming that listed isotopes are present in 3.5 pounds of primary sodium per year diluted by 10 3.1 x 10 5 gallons of water per year. Stored inventory in the

monitoring tanks prior to discharge is given in Table 3.5-2.

Discharge concentration is given in Table 3.5-3. The presence of j 3.5 pounds of primary sodium per year, containing a total of o o 10 l approximately 15 p Ci/cc of fission products, and 1.5 p Ci/cc of 8 l tritium into a drainage stream of 850 gpd and discharge into a f blowdown stream of 3.1 x 1012 cc/ year is assumed. If the 8 i activity is found to be acceptable for release after decontamination, that batch of water (which has been monitored) i will be released to the discharge stream. Otherwise, it is f transferred to the low level activity collection tank and l reprocessed. The reprocessed low activity waste may then be l released to the discharge stream or again recycled. Processing l of low level radioactive waste includes adjustment of pH, defoaming, filtration, evaporation and demineralization similar i to that described in the previous paragraph. The decontaminated l 10 ) product collection system consists of two tanks. One tank can be utilized for sampling and monitoring of the condensate being discharged, while the other tank is used to collect additional fluid. 3.5-5

Am:ndm:nt X D:ccmbar, 1981 Discharge water from the low activity level system and the assumed discharge from the intermediate activity level system is released through the same header equipped with a flow control valve, flowmeter and radiation monitor. Flow rate, based on the radioactivity level of the discharge water, is controlled so that the concentration in the dilution stream and the total activity released to the river is only a small fraction of existing Cod 8 of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR 20. 3.5.3.4 ASSUMPTIONS Data presented in Tables 3.5-1, 3.5-2 and 3.5-3 for the IALL 10 system is based on the assumption that 10 percent of the fission and corrosion products plated out activity and 100 percent of the sodium activity adhering to the processed components is removed 8 in a first rinse volume of 100,000 gallons of water per year. It is further assumed that 90 percent of the remaining plated out activity will be removed if an acid etch is used. These values are conservative and it is likely that the actual activity removed will be less. Tabulated data for the low level system are based on a water flow rate of 850 gpd and an assumed concentration of 10-4 jaCi/cc due a I to mixed fission products and tritium. It is assumed that this 10 l activity is due to sodium which is removed from the reactor for l chemical analysis or due to maintenance, spills and clean up during normal plant operations. The assumption that all of the tritium contained in sodium remains in the water following the 10 f reaction of sodium with water is conservative. It is likely that a fraction of the tritium is released as a gas due to the reaction of sodium tritide (NaT) with the controlled moist nitrogen during component cleaning in the LCCV. This low 8 activity gas which is processed through an atmospheric processing system is not significant relative to other gaseous tritium source terms in Table 3.5-8. h 3.5-6

Amendm:nt X Daccabar, 1981 () 3.5.1.5 BALANCE OF PLANT CONSIDERATIONS Tritium which enters the main stream in the steam generator becomes chemically bonded to form tritiated water vapor. The steam is condensed and the water contains tritium. Any outflow from the steam water system contains tritiated water, which cannot be separated from non-tritiated water. CRBRP operation will utilize a direct discharge into the cooling 10 tower blowdown (2.3 x 10 3 gpm) of one gpm bleed from the The expected curie release is 1.2 Ci per day. 8 steam / water cycle. 3.5.2 GASEOUS RADWASTE SYSTEM 3.5.2.1 NATURE AND ORIGIN OF RADWASTE GASES Volatile radwaste gases processed by the gaseous radwaste system () consist of noble gas radionuclides and tritium generated by fission and/or neutron activation. The noble gases, xenon and krypton, result from fission in the fuel and would be released 10 into the sodium coolant by failure of fuel elements. The noble gases, argon and neon, are produced by neutron activation from, respectively, the potassium impurity in the sodium and from the sodium itself, by the reactions, K-39(n,p) Ar-39; K-41(n,p) Ar-41; Na-23(n,p) Ne-23. A small fraction of the Ar-39 and Ar-41 10 are produced by direct activation of Ar-38 and Ar-40. This source of activated argon is directly proportional to the quantity of reactor cover gas. Tritium has several sources; ternary fission in fuel, neutron interaction with B-10 coolant impurity and with B-10 in control rods, and neutron interaction with lithium impurity in the coolant. Noble gas radionuclides will migrate to the reactor cover-gas space, although a time lag will occur in the leakage from O defective fuel and the movement to the cover gas. Elemental B iodine and particulate forms of radioactive isotopes are not 3.5-7

Am:ndm:nt X D cembor, 1981 expected to be present in the gaseous radwaste system. Although some vaporization of non-gaseous isotopes from the liquid sodium into the reactor cover gas may occur, all cover gas entering the system is processed through two vapor traps which are expected to remove essentially all non-gaseous isotopes including any trac 8 quantities of sodium iodide. Continuous monitoring of the gases processed through the vapor traps is provided by the process monitoring of RAPS. l 10 Tritium will largely remain in solution (99.8 percent) in the 10 sodium and will then be removed by cold-trapping. Further, tritium concentration in the cover gas will be affected by the sodium temperature, the cover gas temperature and pressure, the cold trapping rate and the concentration of hydrogen in the sodium. The latter factor, in turn, depends on the diffusion rate of hydrogen from the steam-generator tubes into the intermediate sodium, the resulting hydrogen concentration in this sodium and its diffusion rate into the primary system sodium g through the Intermediate Heat Exchanger walls. 3.5.2.2 PROCESSING METHOD 10 8 The general processing system involves two subsystems: (1) the Radioactive Argon Processing Subsystem (RAPS); and (2) the Cell Atmosphere Processing Subsystem (CAPS). RAPS is a decontaminating and recycling system for controlling the radioactivity in the reactor and Primary Heat Transport System 10 cover gas. RAPS achieves decontamination of the cover gas by the use of a cryogenic distillation column. Krypton and xenon isotopes accumulate in the cryostill and are periodically removed by transferring them to the noble gas storage vessel. After the short-lived radionuclides have been removed by radioactive decay, the remaining gases in the noble gas storage vessel are slowly transferred to CAPS. O 3.5-8

Am:ndmtnt X Dactmber, 1981 () CAPS processes cell geses or waste gases which may contain radioactivity. CAPS achieves decontamination by the use of two cryogenic charcoal delay beds which provide holdup of the radionuclides, thus allowing them to decay before they reach the 10 Heating and Ventilation System and are exhausted to the atmosphere. CAPS also removes tritium from the process gas ! stream by the use of an oxidizer and a tritium water removal unit. The tritiated water collected is eventually disposed of as solid waste. 3.5.2.3 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS (TYPICAL SYSTEM) A schematic flow diagram of RAPS incorporating typical values is shown in Figure 3.5-2; the solid-line blocks represent RAPS components and subsystem, the brokenline blocks represent compcnents that are served by RAPS and that are part of the 10 recycled-gas system. Output of the Recycle Argon, Tank is at a () nominal flow of 5.15 scfm; this is divided into 1.5 scfm fed to the three Primary Heat Transport System (PHTS) pumps and 3.65 10 scfm fed to the reactor cover-gas space. The PHTS pumps' gas effluent is divided equally (by design) so that 0.75 scfm passes through the shaft seal spaces and the three oil traps to the RAPS input (Vacuum Tank); the other 0.75 scfm bleeds to the common pressure-equalization line that joins the Reactor, the Reactor Overflow Tank, and the PHTS Pumps cover-gas spaces. From this line, a gas sample of 1.0 scfm is diverted through the Impurity 4 Analysis and Monitoring System before entering the RAPS input. 10 The output of RAPS, 5.15 scfm, is delivered to the Recycle Argon l Tank. The Cell Atmosphere Processing Subsystem (CAPS) is shown in } 10 Figure 3.5-3. The Reactor, PHTS Pumps and Reactor Overflow tank cells and associated pipeways are vented to CAPS and have 10 controlled atmospheres, with a nominal nitrogen-two percent O 3.5-9

Amendment X December, 1981 oxygen composition. This ensures that any radioactivity that 8 10 escapes into these cells from the recycle-argon cover gas will be contained and processed to control the release of radioactivity. Nominal input to CAPS is the time averaged total flow of the influent gases. If a high level of radioactivity is detected in the CAPS exhaust, the exhaust line is automatically closed and the CAPS compressors are shut down. 10 RAPS and CAPS employ similar process methods. In each subsystem the gas input is collected in a vacuum tank, from which it is compressed and transferred under pressure to a surge tank. In CAPS, the surge vessel effluent gas passes through an oxidizer and a tritium water rcmoval unit which are used to remove tritium. The gas then passes through two cryogenic charcoal delay beds which allow the radionuclides to decay before they are released to the RSB Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning system (HVAC) and exhausted to the atmosphere. O In RAPS, the surge vessel effluent gas passes through a cryogenic still which removes xenon and krypton isotopes from the argon cover gas. c 10 3.5.2.4 LEAKAGE PATHS AND ESTIMATED DISCHARGE RATES The separate paths of leakage and/or discharge to the environment I are discussed in detail, as follows. Radioactive gas flow paths are detailed in Figure 3.5-4. l 3.5.2.4.1 COVER-GAS LEAKAGE Reactor cover gas diffuses through the various head seals into' l the Head Access Area. The conservatively estimated total leakage 8 rate for all of the seals is 0.0044 standard cc/ min of cover gas. 10 9 l l 3.5-10

Amsndm:nt X Dictabur s 1981 3.5.2.4.2 BUFFERED-SEAL LEAKAGE [} Buffered head seals are fed by recycled argon (processed in RAPS); a maximum seven standard cc/ min of this gas is expected to leak into the Head Access Area. Cover-gas and buffered seal leakages both diffuse into the Head Access Area atmosphere and are vented into the RCB operating floor and to the RCB HVAC 10 exhaust and discharged to the atmosphere without processing. . 3.5.2.4.3 PRIMARY PIPING LEAKAGE An estimation of the total leakage through piping connections, welds, valves and components of the PHTS and of the Reactor Cover Gas System indicates that the assumption of one standard cc/ min 8 of cover gas is conservative regarding leakage into the corresponding Reactor Containment Building (RCB) cells. Small amounts of tritium will diffuse through the piping wall into the 10 () PHTS and auxiliary Na cells. These gases will be vented to CAPS by the normal feed and bleed nitrogen gas cell-atmosphere inerting and pressure control system. 10 3.5.2.4.4 RAPS AND CAPS LEAKAGE Similarly, a maximum of one standard cc/ min of RAPS cold box 10 influent gas is assumed for the total leakage from RAPS and CAPS components into their respective cell atmospheres, which vent to the RCB HVAC, and RSB HVAC, respectively. 3.5.2.4.5 INTERMEDIATE CELLS Tritium that diffuses from the primary into the Intermediate Heat Transport System will also diffuse at a small but finite rate through piping and components into the Steam Generator Building 10 Intermediate Bay cell atmosphere. In the cell atmosphere, it () will reach an equilibrium concentration dependent upon natural-convection air turn-over in those cells, o 10 3.5-11

Am2ndm:nt X D;ccmbar, 1981 3.5.2.5 RADIOLOGICAL RELEASE POINT DESCRIPTIONS 8 Thtre are a total of seventeen Nuclear Island ventilation exhaust cir releasing points which are designed for monitoring / sampling of exhaust air. These are: one located in the Intermediate Bay (IB) of the Steam Generator Building, one located in the Radwaste Area of the Reactor Service Building (RSB-RNA), three located in the Fuel Handling Area of the Reactor Service Building (RSB-FHA), three located in the Steam Generator Building (SGB) and nine g located in the Reactor Containment Building (RCB). Of these 10 release points, only three are expected to contain radioactivity in their effluents during normal operation of the CRBRP. These are the SGB-IB exhaust, the RSB-RAPS and CAPS exhaust, and the RSB-RCB release points. The release point associated with the Intermediate Bay (IB) of the SGB will exhaust air at 64,000 scfm at an elevation of 857' 8 10 I with an exhaust air velocity of 1780 fpm. g Four release points are located in the RSB. One receives 10 ventilation exhaust air from the Radwaste Area of the RSB. A l8 ventilation exharst air quantity of 46,000 scfm will be released 8 - 10 at an elevation of 867'-0". Exhaust air temperature will vary from 55 0 F to 140 F. Exhaust air velocity is 600 fpm. The second design radiological release point of the RSB receives l8 exhaust air from CAPS and the CAPS cells. A quantity of 1,000 scfm will be released at an elevation of 884'0". Exhaust air 8 10 velocity will be 85 fpm. The temperature will vary from 55 F to 140 F. The third release point located in the RSB receives exhaust from 8 the Reactor Containment Building Heating and Ventilating System. 10 A ventilation exhaust air quantity of 14,000 scfm will be 8 released at an elevation of 884'-0". Exhaust air temperature llh will vary from 55 0F to 120 F. Exhaust air velocity is 1750 fpm. 3.5-12

Am:ndment X D:ccmbar, 1981 (} The fourth release point located in the RSB receives exhaust from the RSB clean up filter unit. A ventilation exhaust air quantity of 18,000 scfm during normal operation and 1700 scfm during refueling will be released at an elevation of 884'-0". Exhaust 10 air velocity is 1800 fpm and 170 fpm, respectively. The temperature will vary from 55 0F to 120 0F. Three design radiological release points located in the SGB, one 8 in each of the steam generator loop cells, receive ventilation exhaust air from their respective cells. Ventilation exhaust air 8 10 quantities of 81,000; 74,000 and 91,000 scfm will be released from loop cells 1, 2 and 3, respectively, at an elevation of 886'0", and the exhaust air velocity will be 1,690, 1,550 and 1,900 fpm for loop cells 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Each loop cell has an additional release point which receives ventilation exhaust air from the same area as stated above. A ventilation exhaust air quantity of 16,500 cfm will be released from each of () the additional release points at elevation 874'-0". velocity will be 1,680 fpm. Exhaust air Located near the top of the Reactor Containment Building at 8 LO elevation 987'-0" is the combined exhaust of the Annulus Pressure Maintenance System, the Annulus Filtration System, and the RCB Containment Clean Up System. The exhaust air quantity and exhaust velocity through this exhaust opening varies from 14,000 scfm and 1980 fpm during normal and accident conditions, to 21,770 scfm and 3,080 fpm which represents the RCB Clean Up System exhaust during the TMBDB event (Thermal Margin Beyond Design Basis). The temperature of the air varies from 55 0F to 200 0F. l An additional eight (8) release points associated with the Thermal Margin Beyond Design Basis (TMBDB) event are located at the top of the Reactor Containment Building for the Annulus Air Cooling System at elevation 991'. A nominal total of 400,000 scfm or 50,000 scfm per exhaust point, will be exhausted at each 3.5-13

Am:ndm:nt X December, 1981 point with an outlet velocity of 780 fpm. This annulus cooling system is not required to operate during normal operation, or to mitigate the consequences of any design basis accidents. Activity would only be released from these points in the event of 10 very low probability accidents beyond the design basis. No on-line radioactivity monitor will be provided for these exhausts and offsite/ emergency monitoring techniques will be adopted. 4 8 The radiological discharge points described are sampled and/or monitored. Section 6.2.1.1.1 describes the plant effluent monitoring system for gaseous effluents. 3.5.2.6 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Steady-State Inventory of a specific radionuclide in the reactor cover gas can be calculated from the formula: 5 I

A + E F/V where, I= Inventory i = Input rate (presented in Table 3.5-6) l A = Decay constant (0.693 half-life)

C = Processing efficiency factor (typically taken as unity) F = Purge rate l V = Cover-gas-space volume j F/V = Purge factor Concentration of a radionuclide in the cover-gas space is its inventory divided by the total gas volume adjusted to standard.. temperature and pressure. O 3.5-14

Am:ndm:nt X D;ccmb3r, 1981 /- (x) Performance of RAPS for each radionuclide is summarized in Table 3.5-4. The reactor cover gas radionuclide concentrations, the radionuclide concentrations in the RAPS vessel output and the RAPS cryostill decontamination factor are presented in this table. These data are calculated for the conditions of full reactor power, at one year's operation, with 0.1 percent failed 10 fuel. CAPS performance is indicated in Table 3.5-5 which gives the decontamination factor of the two delay beds for each radionuclide. Table 3.5-7 contains a list of the radionuclides released from the plant from various sources. The sources are based on reactor operation with 0.1% failed fuel. The Failed Fuel Monitoring System sources are shown for the processing of two samples per day. The refueling system sources are the sum of those for normal and anticipated events. Table 3.5-8 gives the annual releases from the RSB and the RCB for the sources given in Table 3.5-7. () 3.5.2.7 BALANCE OF PLANT CONSIDERATIONS A small fraction of tritium produced in the fuel and control rods passes into the steam-water system by diffusion through stainless steel. Tritium is expected to be in the steam-water system in the form of tritiated water. The condenser off-gas system removes non-condensable gases (vapors) from the condensing steam. Tritiated water vapor present in the off-gas flow constitutes the only expected gaseous radiological release contributi^n f rom the 8 balance of plant. 6 Mechanical vacuum pumps will remove the vapors together with the noncondensable gases and discharge them into the exhaust duct serving the lube oil areas of the Turbine Generator Building. The combined gases will then be released from the exhaust fans at elevation 878'0", at a rate of 8,000 scfm. The exhaust flow 10 velocity will be 900 feet / minute with a temperature range of 550F 3.5-15

Am'indm:nt X December, 1981 to 1200F. The resulting gaseous tritium release rate is provided in Table 3.5-9. There are eleven other TGB exhaust points which 6 lh receive ventilation exclusively from the TGB atmosphere and could potentially contain some activity. This potential contribution 8 would not alter the values reported in Table 3.5-9. One release point is located in the Plant Service Building (PSB). The release point receives exhaust air from the hot laboratories, 8 10 counting room, and from the decontamination area. The release point is located at an elevation of 831'2". The design radiological discharge points discussed above are 78 4 sampled and/or monitored. Section 6.2.1.1.1 describes the monitoring systems for gaseous effluents. 3.5.3 SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The Solid Radwaste System is designed to process and package 10 h solid wastes so that they can be shipped to licensed burial sites. Packaging and shipping container design will be such that the surface dose rate will be in compliance with Department of 10 Transportation (DOT)/NRC regulations as well as all other applicable State and Federal regulations. l l Figure 3.5-5 is a flow diagram for the solid waste operations. Weights, volumes and expected activities (0.1 percent failed 4 l fuel) of solid waste to be shipped and the frequency of shipments per year are given in tables 3.5-10 and 3.5-11. All shipment containers are transferred to a licensed contractor for 10 processing or burial. The system will be designed to process or handle five types of wastes: concentrated liquids, compactible solids, non-compactible solids, metallic sodium and sodium bearing components. lh 3.5-16

Am:ndm:nt X December, 1981 (/) s_ Description of disposal of additional materials is provided in Section 3.8, Radioactive Materials Inventory. 3.5.3.1 CONCENTRATED LIQUIDS Concentrated liquids and spent bead-type resins from the liquid 4 radwaste are solidified. The equipment in the solid radwaste system is shown schematically in Figure 3.5-5. 10 The equipment includes a cement filling station, a decanting station, a concentrated waste collection tank, a drumming 10 station, a filter handling machine and a compactor. Equipment has been selected, arranged and shielded to permit operation, inspection and maintenance with minimal exposure to personnel. 4 The solid radwaste system will process approximately one-hundred thirty-five 55 gallon drums of concentrated liquids per year as shown in Tables 3.5-10 and 3.5-11. Total plutonium in 135 drums n is expected to be less than 0.3 Ci or less than 2 x 10-3 Ci per () drum, assuming that no plutonium is removed by the liquid radwaste filtration system. 3.5.3.2 COMPACTIBLE SOLIDS Compactible solids such as rags, paper, and rubber seals, which can be potentially contaminated, will be collected at various points throughout the plant and transferred to the solid radwaste system. These types of solids, after compaction, are estimated to have an average activity of less than 9.5 x 10-5 Ci/ft3 as 10 shown in Table 3.5-10. Compactible solids will be placed in 55 gallon drums and compacted by a hydraulic compacting machine. It is estimated that a total of twenty-eight 55-gallon drums per 8 year will be produced. Transport to a burial site by licensed burial contractors will be carried out after a suitable number of drums are accumulated. O V 3.5-17

Am:ndm2nt X December, 1981 3.5.3.3 NON-COMPACTIBLE SOLIDS 10 Low activity, non-compactible solids (less than 0.1 Ci/ft 3) include used support tools, metal from cutting operations such as 10 cn IHX tube bundle, valves and vapor traps. All components previously exposed to sodium will be cleaned of metallic sodium in the LCCV or the SCA. The low activity non-compactible solids will be placed in 10 55-gallon drums, capped, decontaminated, monitored and placed into temporary storage. Other types of non-compactible solids such as spent cartridge filters, will be prepared for off-site disposal in concrete-lined 55 gallon drums. It is estimated that there will be a total of one hundred and twelve (112) 55-gallon 4 8 drums per year containing non-compactible solids. 3.5.3.4 METALLIC SODIUM IN CONTAINERS Radioactive sodium will be present in the Fuel Handling Cell as a result of fuel handling operations. This metallic sodium will be transferred to the radwaste system from the Fuel Handling Cell in 55-gallon drums. The number of drums of waste is estimated to be two per year, each containing about 20 C1. Since no burial sites will accept sodium, the drums will either be placed in storage on 8 10 site or processed to a disposal form in a to-be-determined manner. O 3.5-18

Amtndm:nt X D ctmbst, 1981 () 3.5.3.5 SODIUM BEARING SOLIDS Sources of sodium bearing solids are the primary, intermediate and Ex-Vessel Storage Tank cold traps. The total estimated 4 activity in the primary cold traps at the end of plant life is about 2.8 x 105 Ci. of fission and corrosion products and 3.7 x 10 5 Ci. of tritium. The six intermediate cold traps have an expected life of about 3.25 years. At the time of removal, each of the intermediate cold traps will contain about 7100 Ci. of tritium. The single 10 Ex-Vessel Storage Tank cold trap will remain in place for the entire life of the plant. The total estimated activity in the Ex-Vessel Storage Tank cold trap at end of plant life is about 7.6 x 10 3 Ci. of fission products and about 180 Ci. of tritium. No current disposal site will accept sodium bearing wastes. For () off-site disposal of this type of waste, sodium is required to-tue removed. Where sodium removal is not practical the waste will be stored on site. All operations of solid waste system will be monitored to assure that operating personnel exposures are within 10 CFR 20 guidelines. o

10 3.5-19

Amendnent X December, 1981 TABLE 3.5-1 ESTIMATED AWUAL CCNCENIRATICN OF Im AND INIERMEDIATE ACTIVITY LEVEL INPUT STREAMS Ki/cc)III l Sodium Cleaning Intermediate Isotooe Hal f-Li fe Low Level (2) Solution (3) Acid Etch (4). H-3 12.3Y 2.44 E-6 1.llE-3 - Na-22 2.6Y 4.55E-6 1.65E-3 - Na-24 15H 5.67E-7 2.05E-4 - Cr-51 28D - 2.01E-4 1.31E-2 10 Mn-54 312D - 1.45E-3 9 45E-2 Co-58 71D - 1.13 E-3 8.'!LE-1 Co-60 5.2Y - 3.17E-4 2.45E-l Fe-59 45D - 8.72E-6 6.40E-3 Sr-89 51D 1.26E-8 1.74E-4 - Sr-90 28.8Y 8.93E-9 1.25E-4 - Y-90 64.lH 8.93E-9 1.25E-4 - Y-91 58D 3.65E-9 5.llE-5 - Nb-95 35D 6.88E-9 8.78E-5 6.42E-2 4 Zr-95 35D 6.88E-9 8.78E-5 6.42E-2 Mo-99 67H - 1.06E-5 - Ru-103 40D 9.17E-9 1.29E-4 8.50 E-2 Ru-106 lY 7.41E-9 1.06E-4 6.88E-2 Rh-106 2.2H 7.41E-9 1.06E-4 6.88E-2 Ag-111 7.5D - 3.43E-6 - Sb-125 2.7Y 6.31E-8 2.28E-5 - Tb-127m 109D 2.56E-8 3.56E-4 - Tb-127 9.35H 2.56 E-8 3.56 E-4 - Tb-129m 34D 7.70E-8 1.07E-3 - Tu-129 70M 7.70E-8 1.07E-3 - Tu-132- 78H 5.46E-8 7.70E-4 - I-131 8.lD 2.75E-6 9.99E-4 1.49E-3 I-132 2.3H 5.19E-7 1.88E-4 - Cs-134 2.lY 1.39E-6 5.04E-4 6.10E-4 Cs-136 13D 1.38E-6 4.99E-4 6.20 E-4 Cs-137 30Y 1.llE-5 4.00E-3 4.76 E-3 Ba-140 12.8D 4.99E-9 6.97E-5 4.64E-2 La-140 40H 4.99 E-9 6.97E-5 4.64E-2 Ce-141 32.5D 8.22E-9 1.15E-4 - Ce-143 33.7D 4.33 E-9 2.01E-4 - Pr-143 13.7D 4.33 E-9 2.01E-4 - Ce-144 285D 5.88E-9 8.22E-5 - Pr-144 17M 5.88E-9 8.22E-5 - Nd-147 ll.lD 1.81E-9 2.53E-5 - Bn-127 2.7D 3.35E-9 2.46E-5 - Du-155 1.8Y - 4.40E-6 - Tu-182 ll5D - 6.08E-5 4.15E-2 Pu-238 86Y 1.05E-8 5.10E-6 - Pu-239 2.0E4Y 2.79E-9 1.37 E-6 - i l 3.5-20

Amendnent X Decenter,1981 ['} V TABLE 3.5-1 (Continued) Sodium Cleaning Intermediate Isotope Half-Life Iow Imvel (2) Solution (3) Acid Etch (4) Pu-240 6.7E3Y 3.64E-9 1.78E-6 - Pu-241 13Y 3.02E-7 1.51E-4 - Pu-242 3.8E5Y 7.75E-12 3.83E-9 - Ig>-238 2D 1.18E-13 5.60E-ll - Np-239 2.4D 5.40E-10 2.71E-7 - Am-241 433Y 1.08E-9 5.30E-7 - Ant-242m 152Y 4.24E-11 2.09E-8 - Am-242 16H 4.24E-ll 2.09E-8 - Am-243 7.4E3Y 1.73 E-11 2.45E-8 - Cm-242 163D 7.55E-10 3.76E-7 - On-243 30Y 1.04E-11 5.20E-9 - Ort-244 18Y 2.18E-10 1.08E-7 - (1) 0.1% failed fuel for fission proi cts and 50 ppb Pu in the primary sodium. 30 year irradiation and 10 days decay of fission and activated corrosion proicts. Decay times & ring 4 10 m collection, processing and holips are neglected. Q (2) Iow activity concentrations are cmputed by assuming that the listedisotopesarepresptin3.5lbsofprimarysodiumper year diluted by 3.1 x 10 gallons of water per year. (3) Intermediate activity concentrations for the Sodium Cleaning Solution are cmputed assuming 10% of plated out activity and 100% of sodium activity adhering to the processed cmponents are dissolved in 100,000 gallons of water per year. W e solution is present in the input streams to the collection tanks. (4) h e average annual acid etch consists of 90% of the plated out activity frcun the processed cmponents in an average annual volume of 1600 gallons. Cell sodium activity is assumed to have been removed in the first water rinse. his input stream is only expected to occur three times & ring plant life. O 3.5-21

Amenchent X Decenber, 1981 TABLE 3.5-2 EXPECIED ACI'IVITY INVENIORY STORED AETER PROCESSING III Im Level Activity (2) Intermediate Activity (3) Isotooe RC f-Life Monitor Tank (Ci) Storage Tanks (Cil H-3 12.3Y 2.31E-5 1.01E-1 Na-22 2.6Y 4.31E-10 1.50E-6 Na-24 15H 5.36E-11 1.86E-7 Cr-51 2BD - 8.16E-6 Mn-54 312D - 5.85E-5 Co-58 71D - 5.31E-4 Co-60 5.2Y - 1.49E-4 Fe-59 45D - 3.88E-6 Sr-89 51D 1.19E-12 1.58E-7 Sr-90 28.8Y 8.45E-13 1.14E-7 Y-90 64.lH 8.45E-13 1.llE-7 Y-91 58D 3.45E-13 4.64E-8 Nb-95 35D 6.51E-13 3.90E-5 Zr-95 64D 6.51E-13 3.90E-5 Mo-99 67D - 9.63E-9 Ru-103 40D 8.68E-13 5.16 E-5 Ru-106 lY 7.01E-13 7.84 E-7 Rh-106 2.2H 7.01E-13 7.84 E-7 Ag-lll 7.5D - 3.12E-9 4 10 Sb-125 2.7Y 5.97E-12 2.07E-8 Tb-127m 109D 2.42E-12 3.23E-7 Tb-127 9.35D 2.42 E-12 3.23 E-7 Te-129m 34D 7.28E-12 9.72E-7 Tb-129 70M 7.28E-12 9.72E-7 Te-132 78H 5.16 E-12 6.99E-7 I-131 8.lD 2.60E-9 1.81E-5 I-132 2.3H 4.91E-10 1.71E-6 Cs-134 2.lY 1.26E-10 8.26E-7 Cs-136 13D 1.31E-10 8.29E-7 Cs-137 30Y 1.05E-9 3.25E-5 Ba-140 12.8D 4.72E-13 2.82E-5 La-140 40H 4.72E-13 2.82E-5 Ce-141 32.5D 7.78E-13 1.04E-7 Ce-143 33.7D 4.09E-13 1.83E-7 Pr-143 13.7D 4.09E-13 1.83E-7 Ce-144 285D 5.56E-13 7.47E-8 Pr-144 17M 5.56E-13 7.47E-8 Nd-147 ll.lD 1.71E-13 2.30 E-8 Pm-147 2.7D 3.17E-13 2.23E-8 Du-155 1.8Y - 4.08E-9 Tu-182 115D - 2.52E-5 Pu-238 86Y 1.0lE-12 4.63E-9 Pu-239 2.0E4Y 2.64E-13 1.24E-9 Pu-240 6.7E3Y 3.45E-13 1.62E-9 Pu-241 13Y 2.86E-ll 1.37E-7 3.5-22

Amendnent X December, 1981 TABLE 3.5-2 (Continued) I Im Level Activity (2) Intermediate Activity (3) Isotope Half-Life Monitor Tank (Ci) Storace Tanka (ci) Pu-242 3.8E5Y 3.45E-13 3.48E-12 Np-238 2D 1.12E-17 5.09E-14 Np-239 2.4D 5.15E-14 2.46E-10 Am-241 433Y 1.02E-13 4.81E-10 Am-242m 152Y 4.01E-15 1.90E-ll Am-242 16H 4.01E-15 1.90E-ll Am-243 7.4E3Y 1.64E-15 2.23E-ll On-242 163D 7.15E-14 3.42E-10 cm-243 30Y 9.90E-16 4.72E-12 On-244 18Y 2.07E-14 9.81E-ll 1 (1) 0.1% failed fuel for fission products and 50 ppb in the primary sodium, 30 years irradiation and 10 days decay of fission and activated corrosion products. Decay due to collection, 4 10 O processing and holdup are neglected. (2) Im activity is based on Table 3.2-1 with a DF=10 5 for all isotopes except iodine (DF=104 ) and tritium (DF=1) 2400 gallon monitoring tank volume. (3) Intermediate Activity is based on 40,000 gallon storage

capacity containing the activity inventory in 16,000 gallons of acid etch and in 24,000 gallons of sodium cleaning solution. A decontamination factor of 10 5 is applicable to all isotopes except iodine (DF=10 4 ) and tritiun (DF=1) . 'Ihis is a worst cmbination of expected operations, with the decontamination acid etch from one PHTS pump decontamination, which occurs three times in the life of the plant.

I f

'O I

3.5-23

Amendment X December, 1981 TABLE 3.5-3 CONCDfIRATICN OF RADICNUCLIDES AT DISOIAPGE TO CLINCH RIVH1: EXPECTED VALUES Low Activity Intermediate Total Activity Isotope Half-Life (pCi/cc)(1) Activity WCi/cc) (2) kt Ci/cc) (3) 4 3.25E-8 3.36 E-8 H-3 12.3Y 9.53 E-10 Na-22 2.6Y 1.95E-14 4. 84 E-14 6.79E-14 Na-24 15Y 2.22E-15 6.00E-14 6.22E-14 Cr-51 28D - 2.63 E-12 2.63 E-12 Mn-54 312D - 1.89E-ll 1.89 E-ll Co-58 71D - 1.71E-10 1.71E-10 Co-60 5.2Y - 4.81E-ll 4.81E-ll Fe-59 45D - 1.25E-12 1.25E-12 Sr-89 SlD 4.93E-17 5.10E-14 5.10E-14 Sr-90 28.8Y 3.47E-17 3.68E-14 3.68E-14 Y-90 64.lH 3.47E-17 3.68E-14 3.68E-14 Y-91 58D 4.90E-17 1.50 E-14 1.50 E-14 Nb-95 35D 7.60E-17 1.26E-ll 1.26E-ll Zr-95 64D 7.60E-17 1.26 E-ll 1.26E-ll Mo-99 67D 3.llE-15 3.11E-15 lh Ru-103 40D 1.12E-16 1.66E-ll 1.66 E-ll Ru-106 lY 1.41E-16 2.53E-13 2.53E-13 Rh-106 2.2H 1.41E-16 2.53E-13 2.53E-13 8 10 Ag-111 7.5D - 1.01E-15 1.01E-15 Sb-125 2.7Y 2.47E-16 6.71E-15 6.96E-15 Tb-127m 109D 1.00 E-16 1.04E-13 1.04E-13 Te-127 9.35H 1.00E-16 1.04E-13 1.04E-13 Te-129m 34D 4.00E-16 3.14E-13 3.14E-13 Te-129 70M 4.00E-16 3.14E-13 3.14E-13 Te-132 78H 2.14E-16 2.25E-13 2.25E-13 I-131 8.lD 1.08E-13 5.84 E-12 5.95E-12 I-132 2.3H 2.03 E-14 5.52E-13 5.72E-13 Cs-134 2.lY 5.26E-15 2.66E-13 2.71E-13 Cs-136 13D 6.53 E-13 2.67E-13 2.73 E-13 Cs-137 30Y 4.33E-14 1.05E-ll 1.05E-ll Ba-140 12.8D 1.95E-17 9.10E-12 9.10E-12 La-140 40H 1.95E-17 9.10E-12 9.10E-12 Ce-141 32.5D 5.16 E-17 3.35E-14 3.35E-14 Ce-143 32.5D 1.69E-17 5.90E-14 5.90E-14 Pr-143 13.7D 1.69E-17 5.90E-14 5.90E-14 Ce-144 285D 2.30 E-17 2.41E-14 2.41E-14 Pr-144 17M 2.30E-17 2.41E-14 2.41E-14 Nd-147 ll.lD 9.90E-18 7.42E-15 7.42E-15 Pm-147 2.7D 1.31E-17 7.42E-15 7.42E-15 Eu-155 1.8Y - 1.32E-15 1.32E-15 Tu-182 ll5D - 8.13 E-12 8.13E-12 Pu-238 86Y 4.00E-17 1.49E-15 1.53E-15 Pu-239 2.0E4Y 1.09E-17 4.00E-16 4.llE-16 3.5-24

l Amendnent X Decadser,1981 O TABU.; 3.5-3 (Continued) O Low Activity Intermediate Total Activity Isotope Half-Life (ACi/CC) (11 Activity (ACi/cc) f 2) (ACi/cci (3) Pu-240 6.7E3Y 1.43E-17 5.23 E-16 5.47E-16 Pu-241 13Y 1.18E-15 4.42E-14 4.54E-14 Pu-242 3.8E5Y 3.02E-20 1.12E-18 1.15E-18 Np-238 2D 4.62E-22 1.64E-20 1.69E-21 Np-239 2.4D 2.12E-19 7.94E-17 8.15E-17 Am-241 433Y 4.20E-18 1.55E-16 1.59E-16 Am-242m 152Y 1.66E-19 6.13E-18 6.29E-18 Am-242 16H 1.66E-19 6.13E-18 6.29E-18 Am-243 7.4E3Y 6.80E-20 7.19E-18 7.26E-18 Cm-242 163D 2.95E-18 1.10E-16 1.13E-16 Cm-243 30Y 4.08E-22 1.52E-18 1.52E-18 Cm-244 18Y 8.55E-18 3.16E-17 4.02E-17 Notes of Table 3.5-3 (1) Iow Activity Licuid Waste Assumotions a) 0.1% failed fuel and 50 ppb Pu in the primary sodium, 30 years n irradiation and 10 days decay of fission and activated corrosion products. Decay time in collecting, processing and holdup are (~) ignored. b) 830 gallons per d 10-4 A Ci/cc is decontaminated by a factor of 10p except containing iodine (DF=10 4

                                                                ) and tritium (DF releasedtothecamonplantdischargeheaderof3.1x10g)and cc/ year.

8 10 c) h e activity level of 10-4 A Ci/cc cmes frm spillage of 3.5 lbs per year of primary sodium into the drainage stream of 850 gallons per day. (2) Intermediate Activity Licuid Waste Assumotions a) 0.1% failed fuel and 50 ppb Pu in the primary sodium 30 years irradiation and 10 days decay of fission and nctivated corrosion products. Decay time in collecting processing and holdup are ignored. b) 4,000 gallons per year discharged to the cm mon plant discharge header. Wis activity is based on the inventory in 1600 gallons of A DFacid=egch 10 isand usedin for 2,400 gallons ofexcept all isotopes sodium cleaning iodine (DF solution.

                                                                                = 104) and tritium (DF=1) .

(3) Sum of columns 3 and 4. (4) BOP discharge concentration of 7.0E-7 /4Ci/cc is not included. 3.5-25

Amendment X December, 1981 TABLE 3.5-4 RAPS PEFCRWEE SUMARY DATA l10 Cover Gas Cover Gas RAPS Output Cryostill Inventory

Concentration Concentration ** Decontamination Isotooe Curies ( Ci/sec) f Ci/sec) Factor Xe-131m 8.6E-1 7.4E-2 1.8E-6 >>1.5E4 Xe-133m 2.8El 2.4E0 5.4E-5 >>l.5E4 Xe-133 5.0E2 4.2El 1.0E-3 >>l.5E4 Xe-135m 1.2E2 1.lEl 2.0E-6 >>1.5E4 Xe-135 2.2E3 1.9E2 2.6E-3 >>l.5E4 Xe-138 2.0E2 1.8El 2. 8E-6 >>1.5E4 Kr-83m 7.4El -

2.2E-5 >1.5E4 Kr-85m 1.8E2 1.6El 1.3E-4 >1.5E4 Kr-85 1.6E-2 1.4E-3 3.4E-8 >1.5E4 4 10 Kr-87 2.0E2 1.7El 3.8E-5 >l.5E4 Kr-88 3.4E2 3.0El 1.6E-5 >l .5 E4 Ar-39M 3.lE-1 2.7E-2 2.7E-2 1.0E0 Ar-41M 1.4El 1.2E0 7.6E-2 1.8E0 Ne-23M 8.9ES 7.7E4 9.4E-3 1.2E0 H-3M 1.7E-4 1.5E-5 1.5E-5 1.0E0

*After 1 year of operation and with 0.1 percent failed fuel

- Concentration in cryostill effluent MInventories independent of failed-fuel percentage O

3.5-26

Amendnent X December, 1981

                   '5BLE 3.5-5 cos -u-cE a==X D.

Delay Beds Decontamination Isotope Factor Xe-131m 1.8E6 Xe-133m 9.202 Xe-133 1.5E14 j Xe-135m >1.0E50 8 Xe-135 >1.0E50 Xe-138 >l.0E50 Kr-83m 1.8E6 Kr-85m 4.3E2 4 Kr-85 1.0E0 8 Kr-87 1.4E9 Kr-88 1.4E4 Ar-39 1.0E0 Ar-41 1.9E0 8 Ne-23 >1.0E50 H-3 1.0E0 l I lO l i 3.5-27 L

Amendnent X Decenber,1981 TABIE 3.5-6 PRODUCTICE RATES T RADICNUCLIDES (0.1 Percent Failed Fuel) l 10 Generation Rate Isotope Half-Life fCi/ day 1 X el31m 11.96 days 1.lEl Xe-133m 2.26 days 3.8E2 Xe-133 5.27 days 6.5E3 Xe-135m 15.7 minutes 9.6E3 Xe-135 9.16 hours 3.3E4 Xe-138 14.2 minutes 1.7E4 Kr-83m 1.86 hours 1.6E3 Kr-85m 4.4 hours 3.0E3 Kr-85 10.76 year 2.0E-1 10 Kr-87 76 minutes 5.2E3 Kr-88 2.79 hours 6.4E3 Ar-39 269 years 1.3E-1 Ar-41 110 minutes 3.lE2 Ne-23 38 seconds 1.4E9 H-3 12.5 years 2.0E-7 o 8 0 3.5-28

O O O TABLE 3.5-7 (Sheet 1 of 2) RADIONUCLIDE RELEASE RATES AND RELEASE PATHS FOR THE 0.1% FAILED FUEL SERVICE CONDITION Cover Gas Buffer RAPS Com- Noble Gas Fuel Failure Leakage Seal Primary Piping ponents Leakage Effluent Monitoring Sys. Isotope RCB H&V Leakage- Lea kage-RCB RCB Cells to CAPS to Effluent to Exhaust RCB H&V Cells to CAPS to to RCB H&V RSB H&V RSV H&V-(Ci/ day) Exhaust RSB H&V Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust (Ci/ day) (Ci/ day) (Ci/ day) (Ci/ day) (Ci/ day) Xel31M 4.6E-7 1.8E-8 6.0E-11 3.8E-5

2.9E-9 Xe133n 1.5E-5 50.E-7 1.2E-5

   .,,      Xe133             2. 8 E-4 .        9.6E-6

2.2E-2
2.lE-14

-? Xel35m'u 7. 0 E-5' 1.lE-9 4.4E-5 Xel35 V ll2E-3 1.7E-5 5.6E-? - 4 10 F- !8 1.3E-9

6.0E-5 *
Cel38 i C '1.lE-4 Kr83m

                       - l    4. 0 E-5       '

6.4E-8 3.6E-9 4.8E-4

8.8E-8 i Kr85m 9.5E-5 6.0E-7 4.4E-5 2.8E-3
1.5E-3

                                 ++                +t                  ++               ++                    0.19                       ++

Kr85' Kr87 l.1E-4 8. 0 E-8 1.lE-11 8.4E-4

2.lE-10

           -Kr88              1.8E-4            5.8E-7              2. 4 E-6          3.4E-3

6.9E-5 Ar39 5.0E-6 7.9E-3 1.1E-3 1.lE-3 7.8E-2 4.5E-2 Ar41 7.6E-6 2.lE-4 6.6E-4 1.1E-4
1.9E-2 Ne23 H3+ .9.5E-11 1.5E-7 ,_

1.9E-5 2.2E-8 1E-5 8.5E-9 Total 2.lE-3 8.4E-3 1.9E-3 8.8E-2 0.27 6.7E-2 e

          *Less than E-15 (E-X = 10-4)
          +B0P Tritium release (6.3E-5 Ci/ day, with a plant capacity factor of 0.68).                             s            ,

og i n, from T-G building exhaust is not included. Also, allowance for 2 weeks per year bypass;of the oxidizer J '3 g.

         ++{ amounts to 0.04 curies of tritium exhausted to the RSB H&V exhaust) is not included. Leakage' ofL,                                    '

Kr85 is Noble Gas Effluent Co'lumn. '

                                                                                                                                                   .A
                                                                                               '.          ,                                       -x.

i i ., h P t

                                                                                                               .\     .

6

f,3

e. .

                                                                                     \'                 _

i TA3LE 3.5-7 . (S heet. 2of 2) ' RADIONUCLIDE RELEASE RATES AND RELEASE PATHS FOR THE 0.1% FAILED FUEL SERVICE CONDITION Refueling Maintenance 'Atix. Liquid Metal Effluent to Effluent to Eff14:ent to CAPS Inter- Total Isotope CAPS to RSB CAPS to RSB to RSB H&V Exhaust mediate Bay Sheets H&V Exhaust H&V Exhaust (Ci/ day) 1.e3Lage i and 2 (Ci/ day) (Ci/ day) (Ci/ day) Ci/ day)) Xel31m 1.2E-7

7.0 E-9
3.8 E-5 Xel33m * * *
1.2E-3 Xel33 4.8E-13 *
2.2E-2 10 Xel35m * * *
1.lE-4 4

                             *                    *                   *

5.7E-2 Xel35
y Xe138 * *
1.7E-4 m Kr83m * * *
5.2E-4 52 Kr85m 4.4E-3 Kr35 1.4 * *
1.6 Kr87 * * *
9.5E-4 Kr88 * * *
3.7E-3 Ar39 0.11 *
0.24 Ar41 * * *
2.0E-2 Ne23 H3+

                             *                    *

1.6E-4 1.9E-4 Total 1.5 *** 7.0E-9 1.6E-4 1.9

o, * (See previot.s page) E n .E 3R Hi!!

                                                                                                                             .' a 0                                                        0                                                 0

p Amendnent X Decenber,1981

jm l 5 A V B BLE 3.5-8 .- AMUAL ACTIVITY RELEASE RATES ETR ' DIE 0.1%

                               ~
                                                            ,       FATN) EUEL* SERVICE CONDITICN s                                                      s v                                      .                                          Intermediate
 - 'w .                                                       Main RCB            RSB            Bay          Total h'                     I      '
                                 .,.s H&V Exhaust         H&V Exhaust    Leakage       Release (Ci/yr)
            .               RaMontfet,ide                      (Ci/yr)           (Ci/yr)                     (C1/yr)

Xe-1315. - 1.4E-2 4.9E-5 0 1.4E-2 s Xe-133m 0.43

0 0.43

               .=.J                        .

p Xe-133: 8.0 1.8E-10 0 8.0 Xe-135m 4.2E-2

O 4.2E-2 x

Xe-135,

0 21 21

                                                ~        '

Xe-138; 6.4E-2

0 6.4E-2

,. i

                '[
                 .               Kr-83m O.19              3.4E-5            0         0.19 1.6
                                              ~

Kr-85m 1.0 0.58 0 Kr-85 ;' ** 5.8E2 0 5.8E2 s .'. 4 10 Kr-87 0.34. 7.8E-8 0 0.34 m Kr-88 - '1.3 2.6E-2 0 1.3 Ar-39 3.3 85 0 88

l. - Ar-41 . 0.12 7.0 0 7.1 l~ *

0
Ne-23 ,

H-3*** 6.3 E-5 1. lE-2 5.8E-2 6.9E-2 Total 36 6.7E2 5.8E-2 7.0E2 n

                                      *<E-13                   s ,. .
                                    ** Leakage of Kr--25 is not included since it is removed by the cryostill and, therefore, accounted for in the RSB H&V
      -                                 Exhaust Column. W
                                  *** BOP tritium release (0.023 Ci/yr for a plant capacity factor s

of 0.68) frca the T-G building exhaust not included. Also allowance'for 2 weeks per year bypass of the oxidizer unit (0.04 Ci/yr,of tritium) is not included.

                                      +%e reactor refueling system inputs are based on normal and anticipated events. We fuel failure monitoring system inputs are based on 2 samples per day. Ar-39 inputs are
          ~                             based'on the-thirtieth year of reactor operation.

3.5-31

Amendnent X Decenber,1981 TABIE 3.5-9 BOP GASEDUS 'IRITIUM RELEASE

Source Terms Plant Capacity Factor 0.68 Vacuum Punp Operating Factor 0.85 Condenser Off-Gas R moval 7 scfm Unrecovered Drains Frm The Steam Water Sampling System 5 gpn 10 Radioactivity Input to Steam-Water System 1.6 x 10-2 (100% Reactor Power) Ci/ day
BOP Tritium Release: 6.3 x 10-5 Ci/ day 10 0

3.5-32

O o O TABLE 3.5-10 ESTIMATES OF SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM PER YEAR IN TERMS OF ANNUAL QUANTITIES Estimated Weight Activity Volgme fibs.) fcil Comments ift i 210 1.2E4 <0.02 Ci Rags, paper, and seals w Compactible Solids

8 10 Non-Compactible Solide

       "                                                        TBD                  TBD       valves, vapor traps Scrapped Componente             600 125            5.6E3                  280       Activated corrosion and fission Resina                                                                            products 100             1.5E4                   22      Activated corrosion and fission Filters                                                                           products Solidified Liquid 1.4E5              2.8E3        Concentrated evaporator bottoms Radvaste                    1000 80            2.0E4                   78      RAPS and CAPS Solidified Tritiated water Metallic Sodium                         15            7.5E2                   40      Sodium from Reactor Refueling Operation

(

                                                                                                                                     ,es Sodium Bearing Solids                 735               TBD                  TBD      Small components                       g >:

2865 1.9E5 3.2E3 Total 0

Assume compaction has decreasd volume by factor of 10.

10

Amendnent X Decernber,1981 TABLE 3.5-11 SOLID RADGSIE SIIPMENTS PER YEAR Shipnents Vol Containers Material Per Year Per Yaar Cm pactible Solids 0.2 210 28 Non4%rupactible Solids 4 g Scraged Cmponents 6 600 82 Filters and Resins 0.6 225 30 10 Solidified Liquid Radwaste 9 1000 135 o 10

 *55-gal Dru:rs O

I l 9 3.5-34

(d i a

U} [ i () FROM SODIUM REMOVAL AND DECONTAMINATION SYSTEM 10 l FILTER RECYCLE 37 p NEUTRALIZ ATION COLLEC Tt ON COLLE C T'ON 4 If lf TANK TANF STORAGE STr kAGE TW TAN K

                                                                                                            =   F IL'E R p     E'/APORATOR    ->  UEMi NE R A ti 2 E W INTERVEDI ATE ACTIVITY SYSTEM                                                                                                    = k:CtCLE If          I REUSE         I g%                                                                 I l

g FROV I W PtANY RECYCLE h DRAINS NEUTRALIZATICN l m 8 II l If 6 COL LE C'ICN II 4 J C OLL EC TIO N I

W If TANK TANK wN- er r, -

                                                                                                                                                                                 ' cR                l'OR f              f    &    FILTER

E < APCRAT OR b CEY:NEGAL ZE4 - TANK TA N <

LOW AC*Jvi7y SYSTEM --> 5{C YCL E M If CtGCHARGE 3r y CONCENTRATE < cue RADWASTE SfSTEM E3I nm Figure 3.5-1 LIQUID RA0 WASTE SYSTEM FLOW DI AGRAM ]& e CO ><

g. Og,, x 0

1 U n$78 , we"s N O GP RU D S EOP E TA L C O B AE K HA S 4 EM ,g , R , J_ F -N C S

            -O             _                     5                                                                 I G                                 1 0      N L            AEL-GG
            - R GLES ._.6                        S                                                          1 ME GIL             EA  S E

A AE AOT h L RS BOE ER S 4 R YS

            - CLO SE _d                                                                                             R               OTV S

T C N

            - YSV C
            - E             _

N-OI _ 7 r1 le L. M-S S P O-S A A P1 1 C y0 O 0 lg 0 ' 0 T s.0 0 0 xn1 1

                                  ~               -          -                                       0e(

G-3 8n it

                                  ~      EN                                                          Da                                        u Ln                                        c
                                  ~ LRRI -                                                           Oe                                        r
                                  ~   EUO-ULTlI                 0                                 5      Cpg                                      iC 5                                  FAN                   1 P

8_ n 1 5

                                  ~      FO-                                      '

4 O g

                                  ~           M-                                                                                              A r
                                  'I l4' l

le C y c e RP aOA R NPR A S O T S I l; Jl la. . V P

             -                                                              _             _                                                    A R
             -                                                              -                                                                   e 5

6 _ 0 4 R W 3

             - R OL                    1 3
                                                                            - OOL

_ ELE h t T E _ T LE MG S C FS P CS S 9 ; r_ ARS s E _ ARS f O

             -   AE           _

S.L E E R SV UE

             -   EV R            _          SA EU                                 - R OV V _                                     E T

m a r

             -                _          RQ P                                  _             _                                A                     g E                                                                            T                     a
                              -                          5                                    E                      ;     S
             -                                           7                                _                                                    i rIL 0                  .,g          c     N I

Y D I ' L D c

5. _ N 0 A it 1 E O

I 0 T a T 1 S m 4-

                                                           .         3                         A                           L                     e S.L                                      L                          A                    h
        ,                                              SA                                       U                          M                     C EU                                      C                           R                    S RQ                                       R                     S    O P E                                      I R                              .

RP C S 2 E O N, T - aOA R SS S m N 5 NPR A P E fc s E 3 T AR V N e RP NO r M u I P S O E M ig C T O F A C 7i,33 ; 7 R P W R OI G 1 3 S E ~

                                    -     (

S C L E A 0 F P R

                                    -     M                   P      ~                                             0 E A S        S                                                    1
                                    ~ U   P          L        S      ~                                                     R S AE A                                 5
                                    -* Y R
                                                     ,A 5

O ~

8 4 N X WO A R B

                                     '                         E                                                            O MI                  V     ~                      0                               H E
                                     - RP                      O C ~

1 r SUE ML S N S L I O i E rIl . li I 3 I PUS ACS U D I p RAEV L L qP 3 V AO V S

                                                                          '   LOA I P p

5 OART 5 1

                                                                                                                             *e 7               V                      7 -

0 0 W'm,W*

p--__- 7 r----7 r--- 7 r---- 7 s i I I e 1 : g FUEL FAILURE g GAS pgpg e CELLS g l SERVICES g g ' AND MONITORING g g g PIPEWAYS g g SYSTEM e EXHAUST l l COLO ROX 1 I I l i 1 i l t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ .J L_____J L _ _ .. _. _ u . _ __ _ _ J 1r m i r 1 r 1 r

                                              -                                                                       r           ---l 8    NoeLE l GAS STOR AGE l Y                      MAINT. PORGE, 1
                                          "                                                                           '----l                     f.'a#'ai.'n"5'%)  L NOBLE GAS                                                             g BLEED w                                                                                                      (AUTOMATICI 1  r            1 r
       ,                                       ~

w N DISCHARGE ab r 1

p. _

_ q

                                                                                                                                       #                  l          NG   I CAPS                        CAPS              CAPS            OXIDIZER AND                                             HE vacuum          --*           CO u-   -9       SURGE      H     TRITIUM WATE R     4          HA OAL E '

I AND W VESSEL PRESSORS VESSEL REMOVAL UNIT l VE NTIL- g BEDS (2) T a ATING e L __._ _J 8 i 1 I I t'$

g I I o e t..--- ..- --.---.. __ -- J e n U

(RECIRCULATION LOOP FOR OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION, AND MAINTENANCE) t.T3.-

                                                                                                                                                                                     '1
                                                                                                                                                                                     -   <t SOLID BOXES ARE CAPS COMPONENTS                                                                                                          P M e

m Figure 3.5 3. Schematic Diagram Of CAPS

gy $acr t U8 g T tmn~ W

                      -If!

0 1 e R R vT ES O aS SAM N E MT GT AA t H. A U E DFS " ER TE tl , d

8. H NFY SN =

G. X TE OOS C E G = 3 = H=

                                                                        =
                                                                        =
                                                                        =

a

V E N S S N G T

           &                              T                         G T DH Nt T A

I 3 N N 3 t N N I E ANS D H I E H PD N L PDN I PNO s t 8 GOU I n E +' ,I lPNO SAP 4 !' SAP a 1INTA J R'C M T M TAHX T H O H P O ALIE I C C ET IN HN E = V = S

                                                                                                =               N e

L = - = L IN E = 3 C H D b O B s - S E T t1i!Il : ! l I ht R S a RL E L P I NE w lC B g Ig!tI d o

                            >                 C       tI       i l
                             -                R                                                  =                        F
                             .                        f   *                                       =

s a

                              .                           "                                                               G Ii I

4 RR S e f PE E R v

                                                                                           &VC   OA O    it c

V TS S P RCP T C a S

          &U                 P    "                                       A                O     SS                   A      o t     HA                 A                                            R                TPS                        E     id BH                 C                                                             CMA A UG                      R      a SX                                                                                E                               R RE                      f                                                         R P

t S lE E 4 CT ~ - ' . 5

      .                                        IS VU                     ~      4     G

_ 3 i RA e EH ~ r S X _ SE ~ E u A HG ig G ~ uNIM _ F L IH E

                                                                      ~          A0T                     _

F1S

                                                                      ~             1 Y LNS EO H

_ ^5L ^ l gg1' fi UM F _ H T A "L . T P BE C

                                                                                                         .        A R

PW _ O E G FL _ A - O K K _ 2' _ A L U _ E _ L 8 S S S L A _ )5 VTS E E

           &U                                    CA C E   +          .        S      tg            !       L          -

H A k t BH d AR D DA A CX RE A E H E H _- FUb00 1

O O O CEMENT STORAGE CEMENT SP SILO CEMENT LINED EMPTY y FILLING c DRUMS DR M p STATION I RESIN CONCENTRATED DEPOSIT DECANT NG LIQUIDS Fi T FILTER HAIOLING Cgp UNLOAD STATION l U U y u CLAMP MONITORING LOAD FILL MIX - AND R NSE T UNCAP RECAP w DRUMMNG STATION w U C IBLE

COMPACTOR SHIPPING DEK !

DRUM -- l PROCESS l METALUC j r SURIAL LISCENSED FACluW - IN DISPOSAL CONTAINERS T60 SHIPPING CONTRACTOR l PROCESS PROCESS FACILITY SODIUM l BEARING & AND g SOLIDS DISPOS AL l TBD , g s'r P8c. Figure 3. 5-5 SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM FLOW DIAGRAM G*

l .i 1 l l i INTEllTIONALLY BLANK I I l I i l l l l O

AMEND. IX OCT. 1981 0 3.6 CHEMICAL AND BIOCIDE WASTES 3.6.1 GENERAL Source for all makeup water for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP) vill be the Clinch River. The makeup water will replace the water iost from the Heat Dissipation System by evaporation, blowdown and drift. In addition, the makeup water, after treatment in the Makeup 9 Water Treatment System, will provide the water for steam cycle makeup and other plant consumptive uses requiring deminerized water. Overall plant water input, consumption and discharge is discussed in Section 3.3. Figure 3.3-1 is a flow chart of water usage. It indicates that the plant has a single discharge point to the Clinch River for cooling tower blowdown, process wastewater, treated sanitary effluent and liquid rad-waste effluent. These effluents and points of chemical addition are also shown in Figure 3.6-1. The chemical composition of the discharge water depends largely on the concentration in the source water. Anticipated seasonal composition of the Clinch River water is found in Section 2.5. O Plant effluents will be treated, controlled and discharged in accordance a with the applicable governing water quality criteria indicated in Table 10.4-1. Descriptions of control procedures for chemicals contained in cooling tower blowdown discharge are provided in Section 3.6.2. 3.6.2 HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEM Heat removal facilities have been discussed in Section 3.4. Evaporation in the cooing tower will cause the solids concentrations in the circu-lating water to increase, as discussed in Section 3.3. To preclude reductic1s in plant efficiency and service life, cooling water blowdown O . 3.6-1

          -                  _m l

l l l l l l O l l 1 1 I I I I I l a I!iTEfiTIO!; ALLY BLA!iK l l l l l r I L O

Amend. X Dec. 1981 () Proven suitability of the casks for their use in shipment of spent fuel will assure the acceptability for shipping the radial shield assemblies, as well as control rod assemblies and radial blanket assemblies. 3.8.3.2 OTHER RADIOACTIVE WASTE MATERIAL Processing procedures for radwaste are discussed in Section 3.5. Radio-active waste material will be shipped off-site and disposed of at an approved burial ground. The source of these radioactive wastes is g the solid radwaste described in Section 3.5.3. The estimated weight, volume and activity of solid radwaste shipments per year are shown in Table 3.5-10. Estimated number of shipments per year are shown in Table 3.5-11. All drums and special containers being shipped off-site will be monitored for radioactivity to assure that the dose rates conform to the regulations set by the Department of Transportation and 10 CFR 71. Temporary storage O space is provided on-site prior to shipment of the drums and containers. o 9 The inert gas receiving and processing system has liquid radioactive waste in the form of tritiated water which is collected in a holding tank in 10 , the Cell Atmosphere Processing System. It is periodically transferred to the Radioactive Waste Disposal System for processing and ultimate disposal. The routinely generated solid waste will consist of compressor diaphragms and spent filter-type vapor traps. These solid wastes will be transferred to the Radioactive Waste Systems for disposal. At the present time there are no provisions for licensed disposal of radioactive metallic sodium waste. The principal source of high activity sodium waste is from the primary cold traps. If the sodium can be segregated from the cold traps, it will be routed to the sol'id radwaste system for storage or shipment off-site for disposal or processing with an approved method. To date, the method for disposal and shipment of 5 5 the primary cold traps containing 1.85 x 10 Ci of tritium, 1.35 x 10 Ci O of fission and corrosion products, has not been resolved. Each cold trap l9 3.8-8

                 .                         _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .      ._                                                                      i

AMEND. IX OCT. 1981 is expected to weigh approxiamtely 12,000 pounds and contain 6,000 pounds of sodium. The overall size is approximately six feet by nine feet. Shipment of low level radioactive metallic sodium will be accomplished in specially prepared 55 gallon drums. O O 3.8-9

Amend. X Dec. 1981 g Topsoils in the areas to be excavated will be removed and stockpiled separately for subsequent use in landscaping. Topsoil thickness varies from 0 to approximately 12 inches. Subsequent to the removal of topsoil, the excavated material (except for the on-site quarry), which will include 4 l8 residual overburden, weathered and sound rock, will be utilized by direct placement methods to establish the required plant area grade elevation of 815 feet and to bring the main access roads and the railroad to the design gradient. 8 Depending on the degree of rippability of weathered siltstone and lime-stone, a pre-drilling and blasting pattern will be established to permit excavation to the required elevation for the Reactor Building and its auxiliary buildings and excavation of the quarry. For the Reactor Building, average excavation depths are expected to range from approxi-8 9 mately 40 to 104 feet below the existing grade elevation. An average depth of excavation into sound siltstone of approximately 20 feet is antici-pated. The quarry will be excavated from the side of an existing hill, A g with average excavation depths expected to range from 40 to 140 feet below l10 8 9 the existing grade. Multiple small blasts of dynamite will be used to facilitate removal of the material. Explosives will be used intermit-tently starting shortly after initial clearing and grubbing and extending 6 through excavation period. Quarry operation will last approximately 4 years and will involve removal of between 1.0 and 1.7 million cubic yards 9 depending on subsurface conditions. Disturbance from explosives will be limited by use of small multiple charges to minimize noise, dust and vibration effects in the vicinity of the plant and quarry sites. Topsoil in the quarry will be scraped off, separately stockpiled and replaced over the quarry when excavating activities have ceased. After quarrying opera- g tions have been completed, alI temporary facilities will be dismantled, excess building materials vill t'a hauled off-site for disposal and dis-turbed areas will be reshapd and replanted. The quarry floor will be covered in sequence with waste rock first, subsoil second and topsoil on top such that each layer is shaped for drainage before the next is evenly spread. Reclamation of the quarry will consist of loosening the topsoil , and ther. planting a mixture of native grasses and forbs such as broom-sedge, purpletop, aster, goldenrod, plume-grass and Lespedeza. 4.1-3

A!tEfiD. IX OCT. 1981 o O1 9 4.1.1.2 CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES Because the CRBRP will be located in an undeveloped area, temporary con-struction facilities will be essential. Temporary construction buildings and facilities are to be arranged in an orderly manner to minimize the impact on terrestrial ecology, reduce land use requirements, expedite construction operations and facilitate routine groundskeeping. Acreage required for the temporary facilities are listed in Table 4.1-1. Following completion of the plant and ternination of quarry operations, all temporary f8 facilities will be dismantled, excess materials will be hauled off-site for disposal and all disturbed areas will be reshaped and replanted. Facilities such as laydown areas, parking areas, plant site railroad spurs, concrete batch plant areas and areas assigned to various contractors are time sequenced to minimize requirements. They are indicated in Figures l9 4.1-1 and 4.1-3. 4.1.1.3 ACCESS FACILITIES i l No of f-site construction of new roads is planned, however, some off-site l I

                                                                                ;8 road improvements may be necessary. Bear Creek Road which parallels the northern bcundary of the Site is a paved two-lane road with little 1

traffic in the vicinity of the Site. A gravel road, River Road, parallels the river on the Site property. Plans call for improving and paving that portion of River Road from its junction with Bear Creek Road to the plant as shown in Figure 4.1-1. Access to the quarry will be provided ! 18 by a gravel road of approximately 0.3 mile connecting with the ' 1 Concrete Batch Plant. The quarry haul road will be built along natural 9 contours to minimize erosion. ; 4.1-4 i

Amend. X Dec. 1981 Clinch River. All wastewater discharged into the Clinch River will comply 9 with NPDES Permit discharge limits. If necessary, chemical toilets will be used in isolated or remote areas. Further details of the sanitary system may be found in Section 3.7. Conventional garbage will be generated during construction. This waste will be collected by an outside contractor and disposed of off-site in a local disposal facility. No incineration of garbage will be allowed on the Site. 4.1.1.6 IMPACTS ON TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY The most significant effects of the CRBRP on the terrestrial ecology of the area will occur in connection with site preparation activities and with plant construction. A smaller impact will result from construction of the railroad and access road. Impacts associated with transmission line construction are discussed in Section 4.2. Site biota will be af-d fected by construction, but the effects are expected to be minor. g Approximately 260 acres (on-site plus off-site excluding the transmission line discussed in Section 4.2) of land surface will be disturbed by con-struction of the CRBRP. Community types, acreages and percentages of each are listed in Table 4.1-2 based on disturbance locations shown in Figure 4.1-1 and vegetation types shown in Figure 2.7-6. Approximately 197 acres (76 percent) of disturbance land is covered with four communi-ties including hardwood, pine plantation, cedar pine and hardwood-cedar. Each of five conimunity types will have more than 20 acres disturbed representing approximately 129 acres (50 percent of disturbance land). 9 Only 16 acres of non-forested land will be disturbed by construction activities. The 258.2 acres of disturbance land constitutes only 0.7 per- l10 cent of all land on the 36,993 acre Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR). However, cedar pine, hardwood-cedar, hardwood-cedar pine and pine plantation are more common on disturbance land than on ORR representing 6.9, 2.6, 1.5 O and 1.4 percent of the respective community types as shown in Table 4.1-2. U 4.1-7

MEriD. IX OCT. 1981 Construction activities will disturb terrestrial biological survey sam-pling locations in communities D, E, F, G and I, shown in Figures 2.7-7, 2.7-A and 2.7-B. Community C was harvested in 1975 and converted to a shortleaf pine plantation in 1976 and will be partly disturbed by the quarry. Maintenance of the terrestrial biological survey sampling loca-tions is not required. Planned forest management activities on the CRBRP Site from 1974 through 1976 included thinning hardwood forests on Chestnut Ridge and all pine plantations, limited harvest cutting, southern pine beetle control cut-tings and pitch canker fungus control cuttings.( ') Approximately 500 acres were affected by pine thinning and by cuttings to control southern pine beetle and pitch canker.( ) Approximately 25 acres of shortleaf-Virginia pine successional forest (Community C of Figure 2.7-6) was clearcut and replanted to shortleaf pine in 1976.(3) Hardwood thinning on Chestnut Ridge disturbed approximately 50 acres.(3) Seventy-seven , acres of shortleaf pine plantation-1954 were clearcut to control pitch canker.( ) This included all of the shortleaf pine-1954 plantation listed in Table 4.1-2. Forest tree growth and reproduction are expected l9 t to increase following these thinnings. Timber on disturbance land will ; be harvested as part of site cleaning activities. Construction activities have been planned to avoid all rare community l types and rare plant species discussed in Sections 2.7.1.3.3 and 2.7.1.3.4. l l 1 Wildlife will be affected in proportion to effective habitat loss. j l White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) utilize the relatively open : I cedar pine and mixed hardwood communities where browse and cover are i available. Forest thinning provided additional relatively open habitat and additional browse and cover. Construction clearing and other activi-ties are expected to decrease deer habitat and populations on the site f: by approximately 20 percent. Population reductions of gray squirrel, raccoon, gray fox, opossum and bobcat are also expected to be approximately , 20 percent since they occupy forestland. Wildlife residing in open ; 4.1-8

Amend. X Dec. 1931 to motorists crossing the Gallaher Bridge. Construction of facilities associated with the main plant (e.g., water intake and discharge, railroad extension and barge unloading area) involves only low height equipment 6 arid structures. Approximately 10 homes on the southern side of the Clinch River will have a limited view of some portion of plant construction. No provision for living quarters will be made for workers or their families on the Site. Housing and school facilities will be available in nearby connunities as discussed in Section 8. The peak construction force is estimated to be approximately 5,400 persons. l10 6l8 Full compliance with fire laws and regulations will be considered a necessity and a fire plan will be proposed that will set forth in detail the plan for prevention, control and extinction of fires on and in the , vicinity of the project area and quarry site. l8 Several archaeological sites have been investigated in the area as O described in Section 2.3; however, all field work at these sites was 8 completed as of April 30, 1975. The Hensley family cemetery, described in Section 2.3, is located on the tip of the peninsula and is to be preserved with the family retaining the right of access. The cemetery O is not in the immediate construction area. Care will be exercised to insure that the cemetery remains intact. 4.1.1.8 MITIGATION OR REVERSAL MEASURES Mitigation or reversal measures will include erosion control by regular leveling of rutted areas and maintenance of present gradients or contours where possible. Potential erosion due to rain, run-off or seepage and dewatering activities during excavation will be controlled by the construc-8 tion of drainage ditches around the periphery of all stockpile areas and at the base of designated excavation slopes. Drainage water will then be collected in sumps and either pumped or permitted to flow under gravity 4.1-11

AMEND. IX OCT. 1981 to settling basins prior to discharging into the Clinch River. Land erosion control and slope protection followed during construction will g complement the landscaping which will be initiated as soon as the con-struction schedule permits. The quarry area will be reclaimed as discussed 9 in Section 4.1.1.1. During the construction period, train and barge arrivals are expected to average less than one per day. Truck traffic will be confined to estab-lished roads (Bear Creek Road or Oak Ridge Turnpike) leading to the Site. Normal state highway regulations will apply to the highways leading into 9 the Site. Control of truck traffic will be exercised by the applicant with on-site truck traffic strictly controlled by a security force.( ) Traffic regulations on-site will be in accordance with guidelines estab-lished by the constructor. On-site roads will be repaired, upgraded or paved to handle construction traffic. Dust will be stabilized by water sprinkling on roads and in the construc-tion area. Airborne dust, smoke from burning forest slash, diesel fumes and chemical odors will create only a temporary nuisance in the area with no long-term detrimental effects. A Site storm drainage system will be developed in the vicinity of Site access roads, temporary construction roads and spoil laydown areas to insure minimal effect from natural water course runoff. Scrap combustible materials are planned to be removed from the Site by contractors or disposed of on-site in accordance with applicable regula-tions. A demolition fill area (spoil area 6 on Figure 4.1-1) for scrap, 9 l non-combustible materials such as broken concrete, miscellaneous metal, boulders or concrete blocks will be established on-site. l l l O l 4.1-12

AMEND. IX OCT. 1981 Revised positioning of the barge unloading facility results in an estimated dredging of 11,000 cubic yards of material', and filling with 700 cubic yards 9 of sand. This disturbed area is more limited than that previou' sly planned, so adverse impacts are expected to be correspondingly reduced. Construction of the intake and discharge facilities will impact approxi-mately 0.22 and 0.06 acres, respectively, of river and shoreline below elevation 741 feet. A cofferoam will be constructed near-the location of the river water pumphouse to permit work to proceed "in the dry." This cofferdam will eliminate siltation in the river during construction l 4 of the pumphouse. However, some turbid water will enter the river during cofferdam construction. The limited dredging and placement of granular fill and riprap associated with the access road and railroad will impact less than 0.8 acre of existing river bottom below normal water level. Dredging and excavation

activities, in summary then, will be limited to several small areas of the right bank and river bottom of the Clinch River between CRM 9 l 14 and 18, amounting to less than 1.5 acres. The impact of these con-struction activities is minimal and is expected to be of relatively short

, duration. Impacted aquatic organisms are expected to recover within a relatively short period. A baseline survey, as described in Section 2.7.2, was conducted on the Clinch River at the Site to identify and characterize the existing bio-logical communities. The results of this survey indicate that communities l in areas where construction impact may occur are dominated by comon l chironomid and oligochaete species. These species will recover rapidly in the construction area. Fish species are expected to avoid areas of l high turbidity and will not be impacted by construction activities. i l l l l !0 4.1-15 L - - - -

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 4.1-1 APPR0XIMATE LAND AREAS AFFECTED BY CRBRP l10 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Acres Disturbed Category Temporary Permanent Access Roads and Railroads (on-site) 18 18 Access Railroad (off-site) 4 4 Parking Area 19 1 Barge Unloading Area 3 3 Impounding Ponds 9 - Quarry Including Stock Pile Area, 9 Crusher and Facility 45 - Concrete Batch Plant 3 - Spoil Areas and Sanitary Land Fill Area 43 - Storage and Other Work Areas 69 - Permanent Plant Buildings and All Land within Security Barrier 37 37 Meteoroloaical Tower Areas 10 10.0 TOTAL 260 73 i l l l l l ? l l 9 l l 1 4.1-16 l

Amend. X Dec. 1981 V average low flow of 5,066 cfs in the fall to an average high flow of 6,772 cfs in the winter. For maximum power operation, the anticipated 10 average water makeup requirement is 13.5 cfs. An average of 5.1 cfs will be returned to the river as blowdown and approximately 8.3 cfs will '9 be consumed during plant operation. The consumptive use of 8.3 cfs is only 0.15 percent of the annual average Clinch River flow rate of about l10 5,380 cfs. The amount of water lost to the atmosphere through evapora-tion is not actually an irretrievable loss, however, as the water even-tually will be returned to the earth as precipitation. Considering aquatic life as a resource, the loss of fish, zooplankton, benthos, macrophytes and the like will be a commitment of resources directly attributable to operation of the CRBRP. Discharges to the Clinch River will be continuously monitored to prevent introduction of deleterious effects to the aquatic life by excessive temperature, chemicsis or turbulence. A preconstruction survey conducted on the !9 Clinch River will establish a reference framework for assessing the O degree to which this resource is committed. 5.8.3 COMMITMENT OF FUEL RESOURCES Initial fuel assembly loading of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor will lg consist of approximately 5.2 Metric Tons (MT) of uranium and plutonium l metal in a 36-inch high core. The fuel consists of sintered mixed- {g oxide pellets of Pu02and UO2 encapsulated in the sealed stainless steel tubing (rods). Plutonium enrichment is 33.2 weight percent. In later l cycles the plutonium enrichment will be approximately 33 weight percent. Each of the 156 fuel subassemblies in the reactor core contains 217 fuel '9 rods. The reactor core contains 1.7 MT of plutonium metal, 3.5 MT of uranium metal and 20.7 MT of stainless steel in the fuel.

O 5.8-2 i

AllEllD. IX CCT. 1981 The isotopic composition of the feed plutonium metal in the core is 9 0.1 percent Pu-238, 86.0 percent Pu-239,11.7 percent Pu-240, 2.0 percent PU-241 and 0.2 percent Pu-242. The isotopic split is similar to FFTF-grade plutonium. An additional 25.8 MT of depleted uranium metal is committed in the inner radial and axial blankets. Inner and radial blankets, consisting of 214 assem-blies, each containing 61 rods, contain 21.6 MT of depleted uranium metal 9 and 27.6 of stainless steel. Each of the two axial blankets, which are an integral part of the fuel assemblies, contains 2.1 MT of depleted uranium metal. An estimated 2427 fuel assemblies and 2142 blanket assemblies will be com-mitted during the 30-year life of the plant. Operated on the once-through fuel cycle, the total requirement of the plant could be as high as 27 MT of plutonium metal, 336 MT of uranium and 600 MT of stainless steel over 9 30 years. However, it is expected that the burned fuel will be recycled to the plant after reprocessing and refabrication so that the actual heavy metal commitment to the plant from virgin ore (natural uranium) will be only a fraction of the aforementioned values. If one assumes recycle with CRBRP operating by itself, requiring one full core load in the reactor and an additional reload core in reprocessing and 9 fabrication, then the comitment from resources is only on the order of 3.5 MT of plutonium plus 59.2 MT of uranium. l l 9 5.8-3

NIEND. IX

                                                                      '                                                                      OCT. 1981 o
             '%                                                                                                                                                   9 Uranium burnup and an assumed one percent heavy metal loss of each batch through the reprocessing-refabrication cycle raises the plant lifetime total heavy metal commitment to 73.2 MT of uranium.                                       The 3.5 MT plu-                  9 tonium commitment, which is required for initial startup, does not increase since the plutonium burnup is more than made up by the reactor breeding.            An additional net of 2.3 MT of plutonium, in excess of that l9 originally committed, will be produced over the life of the plant.

At the time of decommissioning, 2.1 MT of plutonium and 28.1 MT of uranium can be recovered from the core in addition to the 3.7 MT of bred plutonium and 30.8 MT of uranium already removed, leaving a total g irreversible consumption of depleted uranium reserves of 14.3 MT and a net gain of 2.3 MT of bred plutonium. All of the stainless steel in the burned fuel and in the blanket assemblies (nominally 600 MT over the life of the plant) must be considered as permanently consumed due to radioactive contamination which precludes its reuse. O 5.8.4 IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF OTHER RESOURCES Irretrievable commitments of resources include those resources consumed during plant operation. Operation of the CRBRP will involve the direct use of substantial quantities of consumable supplies including: (1) chemicals for treatment of water for the cooling and sanitary systems; (2) oils and lubricants; (3) decontamination and cleansing I agents; (4) minor quantities of sodium; and (5) other consumable items such as paper supplies, spare parts, etc. The amount consumed during plant operation is only a fraction of the supply available and therefore would not constitute a major commitment. i O l l 5.8-4 i

   -- -a;w-. _y - , - . ,-*- - - - --    .y,,,,y.-.-     c         _
                                                       .,      m.,_         mp                                                       -+r
                                                             ,                 9-, _ . , ,,..,.y.----M+re- t-m--------- - - - --         -*'   em   e- - - - = - - - * ' - - -

Mend. X Dec. 1981 5.9 DECOMMISSIONING AND DISMANTLING The Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP) is being designed for a 30 year operating life, thereby placing the plant's final operation at about the year 2020, assuming no premature termination. At that time, 9 a detailed plan to decommission will be prepared for approval by the appropriate licensing agency with criteria comperable to Regulatory Guide 1.86, " Termination of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Reactors". A number of alternative approaches will be evalutaed in terminating the operating license of the plant; the approach chosen will not affect use of the remaining portions of the Site in any more adverse manner than continued operation of the plant would have. Length of operating history, af ter some initial activation, will not significantly affect the approach chosen. The final condition will provide for protection of the public safety and will be environmentally suitable. A wide choice of experience in decommissioning reactors is available from the AEC civilian power program and civilian reactors.( These experi-ences range from removal of fuel and minor decontamination to total re-moval, including some subgrade structures. None of the approaches to date have presented safety or environmental problems of substantative difference than those which have occurred during normal operation of a plant. The land committed to the CRBRP plant buildings, inside the security fence, occupies 8.6 acres as seen on Figure 2.1-4. The sludge lagoon

                                                                             ,9 equalization basin, sewage treatment plant and river water pump house         j occupy an additional 2.7 acres outside the security fence. Depending

{ upon the chosen plan, the termination of the plant could commit up to 11.3 acres of the Site. It is noteworthy that the less extensive l10 approaches to termination do not irretrievably commit the Site; that is, should a decision be reached at some date after termination that justi-fication exists to reduce the land commitment, the cost of recover versus the initial decommissioning cost would be negligible. If the decision

5. 9-1

                                                             ,-                                 --n
                                                           -n                     ,i        .,
                                                                          ^
                                             ,' ~'               ,

AMEND. IX

                                                                            ,/~           "

OCT. 1981 y ,

                                          ,,               ~ ~ . . ,
                                                                                    },#

(~'N, Sensor , Height (MeteFs) m' Description C' ' 0.06 F; aspirated shield Temperature (Contir'ued',

maximum radiation error,

                               ,.                                                     O F to +0.2          F,                .

EG & G, . Idc. ,'Model 110S(M)*-

Dew Point 10 j7 '

                                                           .       -                  Dew-Poiht Hygrometer; thenno-A                electrically cooled stainless                         ,

4- steel mirror cooled to dew ' noint~,-opti: ally sensed, 2

                                                       ^                    -         tiontr'oMad to the dew point;                           )                          
                                                               -,. s                  mirror surface temperature 7'                                                                                           ,
                                                                  -

serised by 'a platinum RTD; --

sens6r range, -50 F to s - /-

                                                                                     . . +140 r; data recording range                                          /'

0 F to 100 E; accuracy 0.5 Fc - .

                                                                          .         ' sensitivit y,10.1 F.                         -

Solar Radiation ' 1 Epply J.ab'arhtories,180 - Pyranaceter. Model 8-48;* fil 7

                                                                                      'cMibrate6 ranga, O to 2             7 c)s-cal cm-i min ',-li6tarity>

1 ~, cmpercent' rom 0tg2gm-cal hin 2 ;iresponse Eime 4 l . , sc. ronds;scosine. response, o ,j [8 , tj s' _

                                                                   / .                  2 percent from 10 to'90 ;

sen i,tivity, near 7.5 6fy j por, gm-cal cm 2 /ar'n i; typical ,

                                                                                      ~o btput, 0-14 O.              ,;    ,        ,           l           ,
                                                                                                                 .                              I Rainfall                      1                                                  ~6elfort Instrument Co.                             '

d Podei 5915-12 spring * ; I9 wei,qhing and potenticm ter L-9utput type; calibrated , i ~ ru,1ge 0 to' 9.9 inches;' .

                                                                                                                                              ,{                          ^

data recording rang? O to 9.99 inches; accuracy , 0.5% ( 0.06 inchh .' sc1si ti v'i ty , 0. 01 inch. l t Atmospheric 1 H. S. Sostman and Co., Pressure Model 2014-28/32-HAL. * ,9. j pressure transducer; portentiometer ot:put; operating range, 28 to 32 inches Hg.; data cecording range, 28 to 32 inches Hg.; accuracy, 0.06 inch Hg. i'O V

A replacement sensor of a different manufacturer or model will meet or exceed NRC Regulatory Guide 1.23.

19 I 6.1-32c - r

                                                                                           #1END. IX OCT. 1981 Data Acquisition System The mini-computer controlled data acquisition system was located in the      l9 Environmental Data Station at site B and consisted of the signal con-ditioners, read-realy scanner, DVM (analog voltage and ohms to digital converter), mini-computer (NOVA 1200 by Data General Corporation) with 32K words of memory, high speed paper tape reader, ASR33 teletypewriter with paper-tape punch, and various interface and telemetry devices. The system at site A included a signal conditioner and interface and telemetry   l9 equipment to transmit data to the si te B system. All meteorological sensor cutputs were measured periodically during each hour, controlled       l9 and printed out by the site B data system. Strip-chart recorders were m

provided for wind speed and direction at both sites. Horizontal wind direction was read each five seconds (720 per hour); wind speed and solar 9

+-

radiation were read each 15 seconds (240 per hour); temperature and dew point were read each minute (60 per hour); rainfall, barometric pressure, and wind sensor supply voltage were read each hour. I Sigma-Y (horizontal), the standard deviation of the wind direction fluc-tuations, was calculated for every 5-minute interval, using the respective horizontal wind-sensor output values (720 per hour). Sigma-Y values were 1 computed from the standard statistical formula: [IX 2 - (IX)2/N]/(N-1) 9 i. l where X = the instantaneous wind direction and N = the number of valid i, readings during the 5-minute interval. The twelve 5-minute values were then used to compute the 1-hour average value, o average (1 hour) = 8

                                +O   *

(a) 2 "12)/12. Prevailing horizontal wind direction for each hour was computed as l9 the average direction in the 23-degree sector (among 360 overlapping sectors) that has the highest number of valid readings during the hour. O

              +      .

6.1-32d

m. _

                                                                '                                                                   AliE140. IX
                                      ,    y,                                                                                       OCT. 1981
                                        .O              -

o . excellent immunity from noise and common-mode voltages. DC measurement is basic to the instrunient, with the ohms function added by optional

        '- ee plug-in assdmbly.
                ~.       n                          ,

Five_dc ranges from 100 mV to 1000 V full scale provides 15 measurements per second, with 20 percent overranging on all ranges. A one pV resolu-Stionik.achievedonthe100mVrange. An input resistance of greater 10 mthan 10 ohms is achieved on the 100 mV through 10 V ranges, and 10 megohms en<the 100 V and 1000 V ranges. The Ohns Opkidn' has a six range capabiltiy of 100 0 to 10 M2 full scale, with 20 percent overranging on all ranges. A 1 ma sensitivity is offered on the 100 0 range which has the maximum 1 mA signal current. A four-terminal technique allows measurements without lead resistance errors m on non-Rati6. 9 _. Other;qptions addec to the Standard instrument are Digital Output, Re-

                 ' mote C'ntrol o          and Rear Input. Digital output provides a digital output
                                                                                          ~

of the measurement. data, function, range, polarity, limit-test decisions and some timing signals. Remote Control allows complete control of the instrument with coded voltages or switch closures to ground. Rear Input

                  - supplements the front panel terminals.

Recorder -- The servo /riter recorder is a self-balancing potentiometric strip-chart recorder, for accurate recording of de signals. The signal l input leads are floating aboveground and the circuit makes use of a guard shield to accurately record signals that have ac longitudinal and dc common-mode interference. The recorder uses a low-pass input filter to provide. transverse interference rejection. The electronic circuitry is solid state, including a photoconductive

                     . chopper. A zener reference unit is standard on all servo /riter II recorders. The flushmount recorder is designed to fit a standard 19-inch rack without special adapters and is available in one to six channels with many options and accessories.  ,

M 6.1-329 7q3- , _-,,,,-,_.--__--,,-,w-

AMEND. IX OCT. 1981 Sn tem Accuracies O The system is designed so that the data meet or exceed the accuracy requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.23. More detailed information on total system and system component accuracies are given in the station manual, which will be updated as necessary (rather than the following discussion) to reflect system component and accuracy estimate changes. Replacement com-ponents will be compatible with the total system and will be chosen so that the total system accuracy will meet or exceed Regulatory Guide 1.23 specifications. Mind Speed Error Units: mph mph mph Component Wind Speed: 10 30 100 Sensor, + 1" of true -+ 0.15 -+ 0.30 ~+ 1.00 value or i 0.15 mph, g whichever is greater Translator, linear- + 0.21 + 0.21 + 0.21 ity plus drift, to-tal error UVM, total error, + 0.03 + 0.03 + 0.03 full scale Software, total 0 0 0 error, full scale Total maximun error 1 0.39 1 0.54 i 1.24 ; i Root sun square error 1 0.26 1 0.37 i 1.02 i i Regulatory Guide 1.23 specification 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 l l l The instantaneous error for wind speed measurements, assuming the individual j component errors are additive and independent (root sum square error), is l within the Regulatory Guide 1.23 specifications for all wind speeds less than 45 mph. I The error of time averaged wind speeds will be less than the instantaneous root sum square error (this statement is applicable for all other parameters { 6.1-32h

l 4 i Amend. IX l Oct. 1981 1 4 i 1 1

I l i Pages 6.1-32k through I l 6.1-32m are deleted ! in Amendment IX i i l 4 4 i t h G 6.1-32k

AMEllD. IX OCT. 1981 Instrument Servicing, Maintenance and Calibration The permanent meteorological facility was serviced by engineering aides, instrument technicians or engineers. Maintenance and calibrations were performed by instrument technicians, electrical engineering associates or electrical engineers. Prior to plant operation, operational checks of the system were made twice weekly or more frequently as necessary to achieve the required 90 pertent recovery of data. The calibration status 9 of each component of the meteorological facility (sensors, recorders, electronics, DVM, data logger, etc.) was checked and the component field calibrated or removed and replaced by a laboratory calibrated component, at least every six months. More frequent calibration intervals for individual components may be specified in the station manual, on the basis of the operational history of that component type, in order to ensure the maximum practicable recovery rate. Detailed, standardized procedures are included in the station manual and/or the laboratory calibration procedures document. These procedures will also be followed when meteorological monitoring is resumed. 6.1.3.2 MODELS The mathematical model used to estimate atmospheric dilution factors (x/Q values) for gaseous effluents released from the CRBRP is given in Section 2.6.7. Models used to assess reactor accidents are covered in O Section 2.6.6. 8 O : l l 6.1-33 1

J O 6.1.4 LAND

     -6.1.4.1   GE0 LOGY AND S0ILS The purpose of the foundation investigations and related geological studies at the Clinch River Site was to develop the-regional and Site geology, establish the sub-surface geological profile, select the optimum location and bearing elevation for the Category I structures and determine the static and dynamic foundation design parameters for the supporting rock matrix.

6.1.4.1.1 REGIONAL INVESTIGATION PROGRAM A regional investigation program was conducted which encompassed the area within a 200-mile radius of the Site, with major. emphasis placed on the Valley and Ridge Physiographic Province. This investigation contained O the following elements:

1. Literature review - a comprehensive review of available data including published and unpublished reports and maps and interviews with recognized authorities, was made to evaluate the geologic conditions of the region and Site;

2. Aerial photugraphic studies - these studies included thermal imagery, infra-red, color and black and white stereography; l 3. U.S.G.S. topographic map studies - maps of the region were reviewed and surface features which were possible j

' indicators of anomalous sub-surface activity were noted for subsequent investigation; and ! 4. Field Reconnaissance - planning and investigation of specific j surface features considered pertinent to the development and understanding of the regional geology was performed. O ! 6.1-34

AMEi!D. IX OCT. 1981 6.1.4.1.2 SITE INVESTIGATION PROGRAM A Site investigation program was conducted consisting of the following primary elements: seismic refraction survey, core borings, surface reconnaissance and mapping, geophysical logging, terrace borrow and 9 residual soil investigation, test grouting program and laboratory testing. A seismic refraction survey war conducted at the Site covering approxi-mately 6,940 linear feet. This survey permitted preliminary evaluation of the sub-surface conditions based on measurements of compressional wave velccities of the in-situ material. Conditions investigated inclu-ded depths to the various sub-surface horizons and the presence of l9 seismic discontinuities. O 9 The total investigative program for Category I structures consisted of 9 129 borings of which 66 were directed to defining the Site geology, checking potential anomalies in the seismic refraction data, under-standing the nature, extent and significance of sinkholes which have occurred in the limestone formations occurring at the Site and selecting g the optimum location and bearing elevation for the Nuclear Island. 9 Sixty-three borings were included in the final investigation phase which permitted the detailed evaluation of foundation design parameters at the selected location of the structures. Borings were advanced utilizing truck-mounted rotary drills and 0 samples were obtained from both the soil and rock strata. In general, the holes were drilled four inches in diameter through the overburden soils to the top of rock, with standard penetration test samples being taken at five foot intervals. This penetration test consists of driving a sampling device into the undisturbed soil under standard conditions - the sampler size, distance driven ar.d energy used are all predetermined. The resistance to penetration encountered by the sampler was used to determine pertinent engineering properties. In rock, O 6.1-35

1

 >                                                                  AHEND. IX OCT. 1981-1 6.1.4.1.3    RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION O

Results of the investigation program are summarized below: 1

1. The Site is covered by a mantle of residual clay and weathered rock derived from the decomposition of the underlying parent formations which generally occur at shallow depths and consist of sedimentary rocks of Ordo-vician age. Deformation of the rock strata occurred during the Paleozoic Era (more than 230 million years ago) and are now tilted to the southeast at an angle of about 30 degrees. The Chickamauga Formation con-sisting of interbedded limestones and siltstones comprises the foundation bedrock in the general vicin-ity of the plant structures.

2. An upper siltstone band approximately 400 feet in horizontal width was selected as the optimum bearing stratum for the Nuclear Islai,d based on shallow 9 depth of weathering, inherent resistance to develop-ment of solution activity and satisfactory engineering characteristics.

3 There is no geological evidence for any capable fault-i ing within 200 miles of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Site.

4. In conformance with relationships accepted by the 8 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for nuclear power i

plants located in the Southern Appalachian Tectonic 9 l Province, and as directed by NRC, the maximum hori-l 8 zontal ground motion for the Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) was established at 0.25 g.

5. Instability of foundation material is not considered a problem.

!O 6.1-37

Amend. X Dec. 1931 6.1.4.2 LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPIIIC SURVEYS There are two steps in presenting the population data in the circle and O sector format:

1. Distribution of the 1980 population into sectors.

2. Projection of the population for 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020, and 2030.

Although the two steps link together, they have separate approaches. 6.1.4.2.1 DISTRIBUTION OF TIIE 1980 POPULATION The preliminary results of the 1980 U.S. Census of Population were used in the existing population estimate and placed in the appropriate sectors within the circle. The circle format is an intersection of rays and radius 10 circles centered at the reactor. There are 16 rays, each 22-1/2 degrees apart. One of the sectors created by two rays is centered on North such that the rays are 11-1/4 degrees east or west of North. Radius circles l are at distances of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 miles . There are 160 separate sectors in the circle. Figures 2.2-1 and 2.2-2 are examples of the population circles. The 1980 population was allocated to the population wheel sector using aerial photography for the area within 5-miles of the site and using Census County Division maps (CCD) for the area from 5- to 50-miles of the site. 0- TO 5-MILE ALLOCATION OF POPULATION The 1980 population within 5-miles of the site was estimated by counting s t ruc tu res , identified on an aerial photograph, which fell within a population wheel sector. The steps were as follows: 6.1-38

Amend. X Dec. 1931 e A mosaic of aerial photography was prepared. The photography was at fm a scale of 1 inch equals 1,000 feet. Aerial photographs were taken on (v) February 25, 1981. e A clear overlay with the circle and sector figure inscribed on it was placed over the mosaic. The center of the figure was placed on the reactor site. e Within each sector, structures which were houses or apartments were identified and counted. Apartments were distinguished from houses by identifying apartment parking lots from the photographs followed by a field check to identify the actual number of apartments when necessary. In cases where the structure could not be identified, it was assumed that the structure was a dwelling. e Using the 1980 Preliminary Population and Housing Unit Counts,1 an average number of persons per housing unit was obtained for 10 n Roane and Loudon Counties. t i' \m/ e The persons per housing unit calculated above was applied to the structures counted. This procedure provided a sector by sector estimate of the people within 5-miles of the site. 5- TO 50-MILE ALL.OCATION OF POPULATION The allocation of population between 5- and 50-miles of the site was performed using Census County Division (CCD) maps (CCD's) and assuming that the population is, geographically, evenly distributed within the county divisions. The steps in the allocation process were: 7~') e, v./ 6.1-38a

Amend. X Dec. 1981 e Obtain the CCD maps. The 1980 maps were unavailable at the time of the study. As a consequence,1970 CCD maps were used. The Bureau of the Census reported that only Knox County of the study area counties had changes from 1970 to 1980 in the CCD boundaries.2 These changes wert. incorporated into the CCD map. - e A composite of the CCD maps of Tennessee, North Carolina, and Kentucky was prepared. e The circle and sector figure was placed on the CCD composite map. e The areal proportion of a Census County Division or town which lies in a sector is calculated.* e The 1980 population for the CCD or town is multiplied by the proportion calculated above. This process is repeated for each CCD or town which lies totally or partially within a wheel sector. e The sector population estimates are calculated by summing the separate CCD or town estimates. This method's assumption that the population is evenly distributed over the area of the CCD or town is realistic for Tennessee. Except for national parks and national forests, the state has a relatively dense rural population . 6.1.4.2.2 POPULATION PROJECTIONS Population projections for the study area for 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020, and 2030 were generated using the Greenberg and Krueckeberg ratio-trend

The Census County Division maps provides boundaries for the county, its county divisions, towns of 100 or more persons, and unincorporated towns of 2,500 persons or more. For each of these entities, the census provides a population estimate.

6.1-38b

Amend. X Dec. 1981 methodology.3 In this methodology, U.S. Census Bureau Projections 4 corrected for the 1980 census -performance were used as controlled totals. Projections for Tennessee, Kentucky, and North Carolina were available only to year 2000.5 Historical data, the ratio-trend methodology, and the U.S. control totals were used to extend these projections to 2010, 2020, and 2030. 10 State projections were " stepped-down" to county and census civil division (CCD) levels. Ratios of county to state populations were obtained from the Tennessee State Planning Office6 or by the ratio-trend methodology using historical data for Kentucky and North Carolina. Census civil division projections were " stepped-down" from the county level using CCD to county ratios obtained from the Tennessee State Planning Office or by the ratio-trend methodology. O i 6.1-38c l

AMEND. IX OCT. 1981 control or baseline stations. Samples of air, rainwater and heavy par-ticle fallout will be collected routinely as indicated in Table 6.2-1. The atmosphere around the CRBRP will be sampled for tritium. A sampling apparatus will be incorporated into the four local monitors .and one of the remote monitoring stations. 6.2.1.2.3 PREOPERAT]ON,\L-CPERATIONAL PHASE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION MONITORING PROGRAM - TERRESTRIAL MONITORING Samples of milk, vegetation, pasturage grass, soil, well water, drinking 9 water supplies and food crops will be collected within a ten-mile g radius of the plant. Environmental gamma radiation levels will be measured utilizing thermoluminescent dosimeters near the plant boundaries l6 and at each off-site atmospheric monitoring station. At least two dosi-meters will be placed at the locations of highest predicted ground level concentrations. All dosimeters will be left in the field for three months. l6 O Milk from dairy farms near the plant will be sampled on a monthly basis. Af ter the plant begins operation, samples of fresh milk will be obtained at least once every two weeks (during the seasons when cows producing 9 milk for human consumption are on pasture) and analyzed for 131 I content. Vegetation (grass, weeds, leaves, etc.) and soil samples will be collected quarturly from the vicinity of the atmospheric monitoring stations. The same rationale used for locating the atmospheric monitors is applicable to this program. The sampling and analysis schedule is shown in Table 6.2-1. Pasturage grass will be collected quarterly from the dairy farms. This l9 vector would be the first indicator in the food chain to man through animal. If a statistically significant increase above the natural back- 6 ground established during the preoperational monitoring program is detected, the program will be expanded to include other vectors in the food chain such as beef cattle. 6.2-5 _.-.a

A51END. IX OCT. 19El Well water in the vicinity of the plant will be sampled monthly and automatic water samplers will be installed on all potable surface 6 water supply intakes within 10 miles downstream from the plant. These samples will be analyzed monthly. Food crops grown by subsistence farmers in the area will be sampled during the growing season. 6.2.1.2.4 PREOPERATIONAL-OPERATIONAL PHASE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION MONITORING PROGRAM - RESERVOIR MONITORING Samples will be collected from five river stations in Watts Bar and Melton Hill Reservoirs. All samples except reservoir water will be 9 collected semi-annually. Reservoir water samples will be collected by automatic sequential-type samplers and analyzed monthly. The stations will be located approximately as indicated in Figure 6.2-2 9 near Clinch River Miles (CRM) 14.4, 15.4, 17.9, 18.6 and 24.0. Proposed 6 discharge point for the CRBRP is at approximately CRM 16. Samples col-lected for radiological analysis will include water from four stations and fish from two stations. Bottom fauna (Asiatic clams) and sediment 9 samples will be taken semi-annually from four stations when sufficient l9 quantities are available. Further sampling information can be found in Tables 6.2-1 and 6.2-2. {9 Gamma, gross alpha and gross beta activity will be determined in water, sediment, clams and fish. Whole fish, the shells of clams and sedi- f9 ment samples will be analyzed for strontium and plutonium. Water l9 samples will be analyzed for tritium. The activity of at g least ten gamma-emitting radionuclides will be determined with a multi-channel gamma spectrometer. This program will sample those vectors which O 6.2-6

4 Amend..X Dec. 1901' 8.0 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS OF PLANT- CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION The information presented in this section and Appendix C represents j the results of socioeconomic studies by the Project that span a number of years. The Project's initial assessment of socioeconomic impacts of l the CRBRP Project was refined and revised for Amendment V of this document. The present amendment updates the Amendment V assess-ments and complements the analysis with results from a series of comparative case studies. i This section contains a summary of qualitative and quantitative assess-

ments of demographic and socioeconomic effects of the project at the peak I of plant construction in 1985 on a study area comprised of portions of Anderson, Knox, Loudon, and Roane Counties. Appendix C extends this l

assessment to include effects during plant operation and compares these construction and operation effects with those resulting under a higher 10 work force influx assumption. Results reported here follow from an assumption of normal levels of competition for area labor (26 percent inmover rate), while those reported in the appendix also include those based upon higher levels of competition (40 percent inmover rate) 7 8.1 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS OF SITE AREA 4 Relevant social aspects of existing geographic, demographic, and economic ! conditions of the area surrounding the CRBRP Site are described in the j following subsections. Where feasible, past trends and future projections f are discussed to provide a background for the evaluation of the effects l of plant construction and operation. Major emphasis is placed on the

study area where most of the impact is anticipated. It should be recog-nized however, that this project is of national importance and therefore has additional broader effects.

i

O 8.1-1

)

Amend. X Dec. 1981 8.1.1 SOCI AL-GEOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS OF AREA Conditions relating to the spatial relationships between counties, munici-O palities and the Site, including distance, direction, terrain, road types, traffic and commuting patterns between these places, are discussed here. 8.1.1.1 SPATI AL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PROJECT WORK SITES, STUDY AREA COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES The study area includes portions of Anderson, Knox, Loudon, and Roane Counties. the West Knox County Area (including the newly incorporated city of Farragut), and seven municipalities within the four counties as shown in Figure 8.1-1 and Table 8.1-1. The city of Farragut is not assessed separately like the other seven municipalities in the study area because it does not provide public services for its residents except for road maintenance. Because the public services utilized by Farragut residents that could be affected are provided by Knox County, it was therefore assessed as a part of the West Knox County Area. Spatial relationships between the municipalities are diagramatically illustrated in Figure 8.1-2. This diagram indicates the roads most likely to be used by project employees in commuting between (1) the Site and the place of residence and (2) the place of residence and other municipalities for needed goods and services not provided near their residences. App roxi-mate road mileages between the Site and municipalities are indicated in Table 8.1-2. The CRBRP Site is located within the city limits of Oak Ridge; however, at least two-thirds of the resident population of Oak Ridge is located beyond the 10-mile radius of the Site and the nearest area in which residential development could occur is approximately 5 miles from the plant site. Knoxville is approximately 33 road miles to the east-northeast of the Site. However, a four-lane limited access highway, Interstate 40 (I-40), runs from Knoxville to within six road miles O 8.1-2

Amend. X Dec. 1981 of the Site and serves as the major east-wes?. link in the area. Kingston lies 11 road miles west of the Site. Other municipalities lie at various distances from the Site and are all connected by paved two- and four-lane roads. Knoxville, Clinton, and Rockwood ate farther than 20 road miles from the Site, while Harriman, Oak Ridge, Lenoir City, and Kingston are fewer than 20 road miles from the Site. Existing average daily traffic ( ADT) near the Site, the combined. daily traffic volume in both directions, is highest for I-40 and equals 21,130 vehicles per day west of the interchange of I-40 and State Route (SR)

58. Between this interchange and Oak Ridge, for different points along SR 58-95, ADT ranges between 7,350 and 9,700. Southward along SR 58 from this interchange to US 70 (Kingston Pike), the ADT equals 2,450 vehicles. Along SR 95, between I-40 and the junction of SR 58, the ADT equals 4,500 vehicles. Along I-40, east of the interchange of I-40 and SR-95, the ADT is 20,030 vehicles.1 Refer to Figure 2.2-11 for reference to highway network locations listed above.

10 8.1.1.2 ACCESSIBILITY BETWEEN PROJECT WORK SITES, STUDY AREA COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES Accessibility between the residences, the Site and the municipalities and counties is a function of distance, road types, and traffic levels of service. Interstate 40 allows good access over the 33 miles between Knoxville and the Site. Good access is provided from Oak Ridge and Kingston by SR 95, SR 58, and I-40. Frcm the more outlying munici-palities such as Rockwood, Harriman, and Clinton, accessibility is reduced by the greater distance and/or the traffic in intervening municipalities not connected by I-40. The intersection of SR 95 and SR 58 is currently congested during rush hours. However, the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) plans to upgrade this intersection prior to signifi-cant construction employment buildup. The intersections of the CRBRP access road (Bear Creek Road) with SR 58 and SR 95 will necessitate the consideration of intersection upgrading to accommodate the projected CRBRP traffic volumes.

%)

8.1-3 I l

Amend. X Dec, 1931 8.1.2 SOCIAL-DEMOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS OF AREA The social-demographic factors of significance to the area include popula-O tion size, distribution, and composition: which include age, sex, employment, occupation, and income. 8.1.2.1 FO?ULATION SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION ; Population projections for the four counties and seven municipalities of concern are given in Table 8.1-3. The four counties are expected to have overall growth between 1980 and 2030. In Roane and I,oudon Counties, however, the rural populations will decline by 41 percent and l 21 percent, respectively Knox County's rural population will increase l by 24 per ent between 1980 and 2030. Knoxville (1980 population 182,249) j is by far the largest urban center within the feur-county region and serves ! as a focal point for the entire region. Oak Ridge ( 27,552), although only 10 one-sixth the size of Knoxville, is over three and one-half times larger than the next largest municipality Harriman ( 8.257) . The other municipality populations fall between 3,900 and 5,800 neople. 8.1.2.2 POPULATION COMPOSITION i Population composition statistics include a breakdown of the total ; population by age, employment trends, occupation types and income cha racteris tic s . These factors are important in estimating future popula-tion growth, levels and types of employment, future income levels , school enrollments, and housing needs. 8.1.2.2.1 AGE The changing composition between 1930 and 1930 is indicated in Table 8.1-4. The counties are following a national trend in that the population O 8,1-4

Amend. X Dec. 1931 is aging. Ilowever, the changes in most of the counties are relatively small. As shown in Table 8.1-4, Knox County is expected to have the largest percentage of persons between age 15 and 65 years; this percent-age probably is influenced by the presence of the University of Tennessee. In almost all other regards, there is no major difference among the counties. 8.1.2.2.2 EMPLOYMENT, OCCUPATION, AND INCOME Tables 8.1-5 and 8.1-6 provide a breakdown of employment by occupation and industry for the four counties and the State. As indicated in Table 8.1-5, the percentage of professional and technical employees in Anderson and Knox Counties (26 percent and 16 percent respectively) is much higher than in the State. Anderson County's statistics are dominated by Oak ,

Ridge and strongly influenced by the DOE / contractor operations. Table 8.1-6 indicates that only Knox County has a lower percentage employed in manufacturing than the State average. Only Knox County, because 10 of its importance as a trade center, has a greater percentage employed in wholesale and retail trade than the State average.

The DOE / contractor operations represent a significant portion of the employment in Anderson and Roane Counties. Table 8.1-7 points out the high percentage of persons working at DOE facilities in Oak Ridge that reside in other communities, particularly Knoxville (25 percent of the total employed) . Annual surveys further indicate that this percentage continues ) to increase. In 1971, 62 percent of the employees of the three DOE facilities lived outside Oak Ridge. This increased to 64 percent in 1974 and as of April 1981 had reached 73 percent. Income characteristics parallel employment trends outlined above (Table 8.1-8). In 1978, Knox and Anderson Counties have annual personal income, respectively, of $2,101,400,000 and $502,400,000. Again, Anderson County's income is dominated by Oak Ridge. Anderson and Knox Counties 8.1-5

Amend. X Dec. 1981 have substantially higher per capita income averages than Loudon and Roane Counties which are below the State average. The geographic distribution of DOE / contractor payroll is shown in Table 8.1-9. 8.1.3 SOCI AL-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF AREA Social-economic conditions include those elements which deal with the availability and cost of housing, the current enrollments and capacities of school systems, availability of recreation facilities and programs, health care facilities and services, capacities and usage of water and wastewater systems, and aspects of public safety. 8.1.3.1 HOUSING SITUATION Various criteria of the housing situation are important for making an assessment of where the CRBRP Project employees may relocate and for evaluating the impact of these relocations. These criteria are the availability of housing, the cost of buying or renting, the ability of the housing construction industry to meet the housing demand, and the availability of land for development for future housing construction. Tables 8.1-10A through 8.1-10D indicate the authorized additions to the existing housing stock for 1974 through 1979 and the average value of different types of dwelling units. Data for the years 1971-1973 and for 1980 are not available at this time. To determine an approximate number of housing units by type for municipalities and non-incorporated areas 1 for these four years, estimates were made based on the percentage l of housing additions by type that occurred during the six years for which data were available. Although this information is not as reliable l as census data for housing units by type, it does provide a reasonable approximation of the housing situation in 1980 and of changes in housing trends that occurred during the 1970's. Table 8.1-11 provides a com-parison of the estimated number of housing units by type for 1970 and O 8.1-6

Amend. X Dec. 1981 1980 in the existing housing stock and the number of units added by type between 1970 and 1980 in Anderson, Knox, Loudon, and Roane Counties . There has been a major increase in the number of housing units within Anderson, Knox, Loudon, and Roane Counties since 1970. In all four counties, more than 20 percent of all housing units have been built since 1970; Anderson (21%), Knox (26%), Loudon (22%), and Roane (30%). However, even with these major expansions the percentage of housing units that are vacant has remained relatively low. While vacancy rates , for all municipalities and counties for the same year are currently l unavailable, there are vacancy rates that have been calculated within the last few years for several municipalities and counties that do demon-strate that the number of vacant housing units are a low percentage of the total housing stock. For example, the vacancy rate for all existing units in Anderson County in 1980 was (2.1%), Knox County (3.1%), 10 Loudon County (1.9%), and for municipalities in 1980 Lenoir City and ; Loudon (1.0%), Knoxville (3.1%), Harriman in 1979 (1.5%), and Rockwood n v in 1978 (5.2%).2,3 All counties and municipalities have had slightly lower vacancy rates within the last three years as compared to 1970 except for Kingston which is the same as in 1970 (6.2%) and Knoxville which remained relatively constant (2.6 to 3.1 percent). Even though the vacancy rates within the last several years are lower than was experienced in 1970, the rates are within the range that has occurred during the last ten years except for Harriman, Lenoir City, and Loudon which presently have tight housing markets. Another important factor in the analysis of the availability of housing is the price of homes and the amount of rent charged. Using 1979 data for the average price of single-family homes sold (new and existing), Oak Ridge in Anderson County and West Knox County stand out as the only areas in which the sold house value was over $50,000 (approximately O U 8.1-7

1 ivnend. X Dec. 1981 $55,000). The average value of a home sold in Kingston was approxi-mately ($14,000), followed by Clinton ($37,000), llarriman ($33,000), and Ilockwood ($30,000) . Lenoir City is the only municipality with an average value of homes sold less than $30,000 in 1979 ($24,000).4,5 The charges paid for rent are very different within the four counties near the project site. Ilenters in Knox County pay the highest amount with charges most frequently between $210 to $250. Ilent charges in lloane County usually range from $160 to $200, in Anderson County from $140 to $210, with rents charged in Loudon County being the lowest ranging between $110 and $150 per month.0 8.1.3.1.1 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACIIED AND CONDOMINIUMS Table 8.1-11 indicates the estimated number of single-family housing units for municipalities and non-incorporated areas for 1980. Knox County had the most additions of single-family units since 1970 10 followed by Anderson , lloane, and Loudon Counties. In the four-county area, approximately 4G,480 housing units have been added since 1970 with 69 percent of the new units being single-family homes It is estimated that Knox County had 95,911 single-family homes by the end of 1980. During the last ten years, 24,811 single-family homes have been added to the housing stock in Knox County with 76 percent of all new homes built located outside of the Knoxville city limits. The west sector of Knox County has experienced limited conversion of apart-ments to condominiums with 331 units converted since 1975.8 Single-family homes make up 76 percent of all housing units in Knox County in 1980, the same as in 1970. In March 1980, !,997 housing units were under construction in the Knoxville housing market area. Of this total, only 680 were single-family, a decline of 32 percent in construction for this type of housing as compared to the same period in 1979. As of March 1981, homes (new and existing) were remaining on the market O 8.1-8

Amend. X Dec. 1981 for an average of 109 days as compared to 96 aays for the same period in 1980.10 Residential construction that has occurred during the overall housing slump in 1980 has been concentrated in the western part of Knox County. In Knox County, housing costs vary widely ranging from

 $20,000 to $180,000 with the average sold price for new constructed and existing units approximately $54,000 for March 1981.

There have been approximately 5,440 housing units added in Anderson County since 1970 with 65 percent being single-family homes. There are an estimated 19,520 single-family homes in 1980 as compared to 15,993 in 1970. Most single-family homes built were located in Oak Ridge (1,020 units) or on non-inccrpcrated land (1,926 units). Three times as many single-family homes were built in Oak Ridge as in Clinton (306) and five times as many as in Oliver Springs (209). Single-family homes comprised approximately 76 percent of the housing stock in 1980, a decline of about three percent since 1970. During the 1970's, the vacancy rate for 10 single-family homes in Anderson County has never been higher than 2 percent. The price of new homes has increased about 100 percent in O Oak Ridge since 1974 but only about 40 percent in Clinton.4' It is estimated that Loudon County had 9,264 single-family homes by the end of 1980, an increase of 1,749 units since 1970. Most of the homes built in Loudon County between 1970 and 1980 occurred on non-incorporated land (1,538 units) as compared to Lenoir City (120 units) and the city of Loudon (91 units). In 1970, single-family homes com-prised about 89 percent of the housing stock and approximately 86 percent in 1980, a decline of only 3 percent. This minor loss in percent share of total housing stock was balanced by an equal increase in percent share of mobile homes from 6 to 9 percent of total housing stock. In Loudon County, the average price of single-family bomes that sold (new and existing) during 1981 was about $33,000.4' O 8.1-9

Emend. X Dec. 1981 Roane County experienced a major decrease in the percentage of the ' total housing stock comprised of single-family homes between 1970 and 1980. In 1970, there were 11,369 single-family homes which made up approximately 87 percent of the total housing stock. By 1980 there were 13,349 single-family homes, an increase of 1,980 units but a decrease from 87 to 71 percent of the total housing stock. The shift was caused by the significant increase in mobile home additions to the i housing stock. Of the 1980 single-family units added during the last ten years, 1,362 were built on non-incorporated land, 215 in Kingston, 209 , e in Rockwood, and 194 in Harriman. The average price of single-family I homes that sold during 1981 (new and existing) was about $44,000.4'7 , 8.1.3.1.2 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS ; i Table 8.1-11 indicates the estimated number of multi-family units (two or more units per structure) by county for 1970 and 1980. In 1980, Knox 10 County had approximately six times as many multi-family units (24,726 units) as existed in Anderson County (4,209 units). Roane County had l 1,827 multi-family units in 1980 and Loudon County the least with only 558 units. There were only minor changes in the percentage share of total housing stock comprised by multi-family units between 1970 and ; 1980 in the four-county area. Roane County experienced the largest I gain in multi-family units as a percentage of the total housing stock between 1970 to 1980 from approximately 8.0 to 10.0 percent. Loudon County increased only from about 4.5 to 5.0 percent. Both Anderson and Knox Counties experienced almost no change with Anderson County dropping from about 17.8 to 16.3 percent and Knox County from 20.4 to 19.6 percent. The cost of renting in Knox County is higher than any other county The average monthly rent for a one-bedroom unit in Knox County during the spring,1980, was $212 and $245 for a two-bedroom apartment. The average monthly rent in both Harriman and Kingston of Roane County 9 8.1-10

Amend. X Dec. 1981 was $160 for a one-bedroom unit and $201 for a two-bedroom unit. In i Anderson County, the majority of all units are located in the city of Oak Ridge. Rent for one-bedroom units averaged $143 with two-bedroom units $213 per month.6 The costs of renting were lowest in Loudon County where one-bedroom units averaged $111 with two-bedroom units only $149 per month.6 The vacancy rates for multi-family units are, as a general rule, higher than for single-family units or for the total of all types of housing units. Knox and Loudon Counties had the highest vacancy rates for one-bedroom units with approximately 3.7 percent followed by Roane County (2.8%) and Anderson County (.9%). The vacancy rates for two-bedroom units were highest in Anderson County at 6 percent followed by both Knox and Loudon Counties (3.7%) and Roane County (1.6%).6 In the four counties of Anderson, Knox, Loudon, and Roane, the largest share of multi-family units are located in the municipalitics of each county, 10 For example, in Anderson and Knox Counties, 77 and 75 percent respec-d tively of all units are located in the cities of Oak Ridge and Knoxville. The same is true in Loudon and Roane Counties where 67 percent of all units are located in either Lenoir City or Loudon and 76 percent are located in either Harriman (812), Rockwood (441), and Kingston (129). Knox County is the only county in which more units were built in non-incorporated areas during the last ten years as compared to within municipalities (4,952 units to 803 units in Knoxville). Apartments in western Knox County are listed in Table 8.1-12. There 7 have been 2,900 units added to the existing housing stock of multi-family units in this sector since October 1975. In January 1981, there were i 8,359 total units in this sector with 576 units vacant (6.9 percent vacancy rate). This sector has the highest vacancy rate for any sector within the l Knoxville housing market area. Only three units were under construction 1 in January 1981 as a result of the over-supply of apartments. There is a wide range of rents in the western part of Knox County with vacancies available at all rent levels. O 8.1-11

Amend. X Dec. 1981 8.1.3.1.3 MOBILE IIOME SITES Table 8.1-13 indicates the growth of mobile home use between 1960 and 1980. In 1970, Anderson, Loudon, and Roane Counties exceeded the state percentage of total occupied units made up of mobile homes. The same should also be true for 1980 with Knox County probably only slightly below the state in percentage of total occupied units made up of mobile homes. However, it is estimated that Knox County almost doubled in the number of housing units that are mobile homes since 1970. Roane County has the highest percentage of mobile homes as a percentage of total occupied units (18.9%) followed by Loudon (9.4%), Anderson (8.2%), and Knox County (4.2%) in 1980. Table 8.1-11 shows . that of all housing units added between 1970 and 1980 in Anderson, Loudon, and Roane Counties, approximately (24%) in Anderson, (20%) , in Loudon, and (50;) in Roane County were mobile homes. These ! percentages are considerably higher than the percentage of housing 10 units in 1970 that were mobile homes; indicating that mobile homes were becoming more acceptable as a type of housing during the 1970's. This l' significant growth of mobile homes since 1970 reflects the increasing gap in the overall supply of suitable low-cost conventional housing. Mobile . homes sold in the United States in 1979 are considerably less expensive j to buy with an average price of $14,700 for a single-section and $24,500 for a multi-section as com ared to the average price of a single-family home sold in the same year of $71,800.11 This trend of increasing use , of mobile homes is expected to continue. { l Table 8.1-14 shows the dominance of rural areas for mobile home sites. Anderson County has the highest rural percentage (951) followed by l Roane (891), Knox (861), and Loudon County with (77%). l There are two basic reasons for the dominance of rural mobile home loca tion s . First, there is a large number of rural residents within the j l l 8.1-12 O l

Amend. X Dec. 1981

~  counties (Table 8.1-3); Loudon County having the largest rural popula-(v) tion percentage (67%) followed by Roane (54%), Anderson (51%), and Knox County having the smallest rural population percentage (43%).

Second, some municipal zoning regulations generally place greater restrictione on the placement of mobile homes within their jurisdiction than do the counties. However, some counties do require that the mobile homes in outlying areas be located in designated parks or along existing water and sewer lines.12 Generally, the vacancy rate for mobile homes is higher than the vacancy rate for either single-family homes or for the total of all existing housing units, and usually lower than the vacancy rate for multi-family units in a particular county. In Knox County during the last ten years, the vacancy rate for mobile homes has varied from a low of 2.5 percent to a high of 6.5 percent. Anderson County has varied from a low of 2.7 percent to a high of 14.4 percent. The vacancy rate for these 10 counties in March 1980 was 2.5 percent for Knox County and 4.5 percent

   '"^"""'"" """~ '"""""""""'"'"'"""""*"*"""'""""""

C-) Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) has been relatively stable over the last two years at 2.7 percent in 1979 and 2.5 percent in 1980.3 8.1.3.2 SCHOOL SYSTEMS The school systems within the study area that most likely could be impacted by the CRBRP Project and current school enrollments and capacities for 1980-1981 are shown in Table 8.1-15. For the Anderson County schools, there is additional capacity at all grade levels, kindergarten through 12. The Clinton schools serve only grades kindergarten through sixth. The schools have additional capacity at all grade levels which could be attractive to families with children in elementary grades. O 8.1-13

Amendo X

                                               ,                                               Dec. 1981            -

u. The Oak Ridge system has considerable room for additional enrollments at all grade levels, kindergarten thcough 12. _ For Roane County, there is room for incieasing. enrollments at all grade levels , kindergarten through 12.' In the Harriman system, there is rooni for enrollments at all grade levels

although kindergarten is close to capacity. .

For the Knox schools, all of the grades except 4, 6, 9, and 12 have exceeded their capacities. The greatest overcrowding is in grades 7 and 8. Grade 6 in the Loudon system marginally exceeds capacity, with grade 7 exceeding capacity to a higher level. Grades 2, 3, 4, and 5 can accom-modate additional students. Grades 1 'and 8 through 12 are at capacity, with kindergarten being close to capacity. 10 Lenoir City's schools have additional room for increased enrollments at grades 2, 3, and 4. All other grades are at capacity. In summary, in 1981 the study area as a whole has additional room for. increased enrollments. The Oak Ridge, Anderson, Roane, and IIarriman systems have the largest differential between capacity at.d current enroll- ' ments . The Knox County system is the exception with overcrowding at - four levels. Within individual systems, some grade levels may be over-crowded while others have additional capacity t 8.1.3.3 WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS i Information relating to water and wastewater systems within the major utility districts of the study area is presented in Tables 8.1-16 and 8.1-17. Updated data concerning the utility district's current operations, O 8.1-14 l

                      ,            ,.g E,             -
                                                   ,s
               ,!                  /'          .      '                                                    Amend. X Dec. 1981 treah nent, capacity, consumption, and proposed plans were obtained Q,                     duritig, the telephone survey conducted on April 8, 9, and 10,1981.

i, s 8M .3'.3.1"l, WATER SYSTEMS

      /
         ~,,                    .                       ,

NThe water soarces, treatment capacities, and consumption rates for the

               / s               -

t i npijer utility districts are shown in Table 8.1-16. It should be pointed I ' out that although the table indicates present treatment capacities, many of the utility districts have tie-in lines with adjacent districts to purchase additional wat'er on a regular or emergency basis. Also, many utility districts have programs either underway or proposed to increase their treatment capacities and upgrade their distribution systems.13

                                               -a                                                                    i, in Anderson County, DOE provides all of Oak Ridge's water supply.

DOE's present plant capacity is 24 million gallons per day (mgd). Clinton' has a 2.16 mgd treatment plant and Oliver Springs a 1.2 mgd treatment plant. Oliver Springs also purchases 0.5 mgd of water from 10 g- the Anderson County Utility Board on weekends. Oliver Springs is tied to DOE's supply for emergencies. Clinton sells water to the Andersonville Utility District which lies east of Clinton and to the North Anderson County Utility . District which serves an area northeast of Clinton. The Anderson County Utility Board owns and operates a 2 mgd water treatment plant on the Clinch River just west of Clinton. This is a wholesale operation with water sold to the First Utility District of Anderson County, Oliver Springs, j, , the Marlow Utility District which lies northeast of Oliver Springs, and the

                             ' North Anderson County Utility District.         The First Utility District of Anderson County obtains water from springs and buys water from the
  '/                          Hallsdale-Powell Utility District as well as the Anderson County Utility
               ^

Board. This District serves the South Clinton and Claxton areas. The Norris water system sells water to the Andersonville Utility District. The Hallsdale,-Powell Utility District obtains water from two springs and two syt.ter treatment plants for a total present capacity of 4.02 mgd. Their 2 mgd plant on the Clinch River will be increased to 4 mgd for O V 8.1-15

w Amend. X Dec. 1981 a future total capacity of 6.02 mgd. An emergency connection exists between Hallsdale-Powell, the Northeast Knox Utility District, and the West 'driox Utility District. Roane Cobty's water supply systems cover only part of the county, concentrated primarily in and around the municipalities of Kingston, Harriman , and 'Rockwood. Most of the south and southeastern part of the county does not have any water service. Rockwood has completed a new 6 mgd ozone type water treatment plant. Rockwood also supplies water to the Midtown Utility District lying west of Kingston. Harriman serves the small outlying Swan Pond Utility District and the Wolfe Branch Utility District. The Cumberland Utility District which serves the area between Harriman and Oliver Springs has a treatment plant capacity of 0.864 mgd and sells water to the Plateau Utility District at Wartburg. The southwestern portion of Knox County is served by the First Utility 10 District of Knox County, which covers the area south of 1-40 to the Loudon County line, and by the West Knox Utility District which lies between the City of Knoxville and Oak Ridge. To accommodate the rapid growth that is taking place in West Knox County, the West Knox Utility District has two plants of 2.5 mgd and 4 mgd capacities. The West Knox Utility District sells water to the First Utility District of Knox County and is connected to the Hallsdale-Powell Utility District. The capacity of the First Utility District of Knox County has recently been increased to 5 mgd. The city of Knoxville has recently increased their I watcc treatment capacity to 50 mgd. l Loudon, Lenoir City, and the Dixie-Lee Utility Districts are the principal l suppliers of water in the northern third of Loudon County. Lenoir City l has increased its treatment capacity to 3 mgd primarily to supply a proposed industrial park and commercial shopping center. It also sells water to the Dixie-Lee Utility District. Dixie-Lee serves the area north and northeast of Lenoir City extending along SR-95 to Eaton's O 8.1-16

Am:nd. X Dec. 1981 Crossroads and has a treatment capacity of .6 mgd. Dixie-Lee also sells water to the Martel Utility District, a small district lying north-east of Lenoir City. Loudon is proposing to increase its treatment plant capacity to 4 mgd.13 Most water systems within the study area are operating at levels con-siderably below treatment capacity. Of the 16 water systems,11 are operating at 60% or less of system treatment capacity and 3 at 75% or less of capacity. Only the First Utility District in Anderson County and the Piney Utility District in Loudon County are operating at the maximum level of treatment capacity. Both districts are able to pur-chase additional water on a regular basis from adjacent districts during the interim period while additional plant capacities are being increased. 8.1.3.3.2 WASTEWATER SYSTEMS The treatment types, treatment capacities, and average daily flows for 10 the major utility districts in the study area are shown in Table 8.1-17. O Most of the sewer systems are located in or near the municipalities. This leaves large areas of the rural portions of the four-county area dependent on septic tanks and disposal fields. Ilowever, in many parts of Anderson, Roane and Loudon Counties, soils are unsuitable for septic tanks or disposal field systems, and this must be taken into account for sound rural residential planning. Some of the utility districts collect and treat the sewage from adjacent districts due to the topography or the absence of facilities in their own districts. Many of the utilities are currently proposing to build new treatment plants or improve existing ones and upgrade their systems accordingly.13 In Anderson County, the City of Oak Ridge currently has under con-struction a new 12 mgd plant which should be completed by 1983. This plant will provide tertiary treatment. Currently, most of the residences in the First Utility District of Anderson County use septic tanks for wastewater disposal. O 8.1-17

Amend. X 0::c. 1931 In Roane County, sewer systems are located principally within the municipalities of Kingston, Harriman, and Rockwood. Harriman plans to construct a 4.5 mgd secondary treatment plant by 1984. Kingston will build a new 1.3 mgd secondary treatment plant during 1981-82. Outside these municipalities, residents must rely on septic tanks and disposal fields which must be located in suitable soil areas. In the western part of Knox County, sewer service is provided by the West Knox Utility District and the First Utility District of Knox County. West Knox has three separate drainage areas. In the Ten Mile Creek area, sewage is treated by the City of Knoxville by its Fourth Creek Plan t . This plant is currently being expanded by 12 mgd. Knoxville is currently upgrading its Third Creek Plant from 25 mgd to 40 mgd; and some of the flow will be diverted from the Fourth Creek Plant to the Third Creek Plant. Knoxville and Knox County Utility Districts are in the process of upgrading their individual wastewater treatment 10 plants since plans for a large regional plant proposed for Knox County have been dropped. The expansion of the Knoxville Utility District to a combined plant treatment capacity of 50 mgd is planned for com-pletion by late 1981. In the Beaver Creek area, two small plants have been replaced by a new I mgd plant. In the Hardin Valley area, all of the residents use septic tanks. The First District has two drainage s ys tem s . The Ten Mile Creek system is connected to West Knox District and is ultimately treated by Knoxville. In the Turkey Creek area, the First District has a 1.5 mgd plant. This plant will be expanded to 3.2 mgd in the future. In Loudon County, sewer service is provided in only Lenoir City and Loudon (town). The rest of the county must rely on septic tanks. Much of Loudon County has soils that are not suitable for high density development . Loudon has plans to build a new 8 mgd treatment plant by late 1982. O 8.1-18

Amend. X Dec. 1981 gs All utility districts in the study area are operating well below treatment capacity except for the IIarriman district. Seven districts are operating at less than (70%) of capacity with Rockwood at (75%), Kingston (83%), while IIarriman is operating at maximum capacity. Of the 11 districts in the study area, 6 plan to increase existing plant capacity by 1984, including the municipalities of Rockwood, Kingston, and IIarriman, which have the lowest differentials between average daily flow and treatment capacity. 8.1.3.3.3 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL Each of the four impact counties has a different solid waste disposal system. Anderson, Loudon, and Roane Counties operate their own landfills while Knox County utilizes a private waste disposal firm. The Anderson County landfill which also serves Oak Ridge, is approaching capacity and is in the process of acquiring approval for 0 expansion . The landfill currently receives about 150 tons per day of (~N solid waste. Loudon County has a relatively new landfill and receives U about 75 tons per day. The Roane County landfill, which also receives Morgan County's waste, is several years away from reaching capacity and receives about 150 tons per day. Solid waste from Knox County, including Knoxville, is collected by a private firm and disposed of in a landfill in Anderson County operated by that firm. The firm disposes of about 150 tons per day from Knox County. 8.1.3.4 IIEALTH CARE The number and location of medical facilities for the study area are shown in Table 8.1-18. The average occupancy rates for hospitals in counties surrounding the project area include: Anderson (76%), Knox (76%), Loudon (63.8%), and Roane (63%). The 1980 census final population count for these counties was Anderson - 67,346, Knox - 319,694, Loudon - 28,553, and Roane County - 48,425. Based (~%, O 8.1-19

Amend. X Dec. 1901 upon these population numbers, the physician per 1,000 population ratio for Anderson County would be 1.29, Knox County 2.01, Loudon County at .16, and .66 for Roane County. The ratio of dentist per 1,000 population for Anderson County is .56, Knox County, .67, Loudon County at .39, and .43 for Roane County. 8.1.3.5 PUBLIC SAFETY 8.1.3.5.1 LAW ENFORCEMENT Information related to public safety is presented in Table 8.1-19. The number of policemen per 1,000 population in the various municipalities ranges from over 2.00 in Clinton and Rockwood to 1.53 in Oak Ridge. Ilarriman. Kingston, Lenoir City, and Knoxville have rates of between 1.57 and 1.68 per 1,000. In addition, each county has a sheriff's department with its staff of deputies. The rates of law enforcement officers per 1,000 population are lower in the unincorporated parts of the counties than in the cities ranging from .50 in Roane County to 10

  .62 in Anderson County.

8.1.3.5.2 FIRE PROTECTION For fire protection, the total fire department personnel consists of full-time paid firemen, paid-on-call firemen and volunteer firemen (see Table 8.1-19). Of the municipalities, only Lenoir City does not have any full-time firemen. Oak Ridge and Knoxville are the only municipalities that have only full-time paid firemen. In most of the smaller municipali-ties the staff of full-time firemen is supported by a considerably greater number of paid-on-call and volunteer firemen. In addition to the municipal fire departments, all of the counties have fire department personnel with l only Knox County having full-time personnel. Some of these county 1 I personnel are members of emergency rescue squads whose duties also include fighting fires. 8.1-20 O 1 l

Amend. X Dec. 1981 8.1.3.6 RECREATION Information related to community recreation facilities for the study area is shown in Table 8.1-20. There are five full-time recreation and park agencies that provide year-round comprehensive programming and employ professional staff within the study area. Anderson County is served by the Oak Ridge Recreation and Parks Department and the Clinton Recrea-tion and Parks Department. Recreation programs in Knox County are provided primarily through the Knox County Recreation Department and the Knoxville Bureau of Recreation. Roane County is served by one full-time department located in Rockwood. No full-time recreation and parks department exsits in Loudon County. Even though many municipalities lack full-time recreation and parks departments, practically all have some mechanism to provide part-time recreation programs. Typical groups in this category include community clubs, civic groups, commercial operators, and volunteers. 10 0 8.1.3.7 SUIOlARY Section 8.1 presented information of existing geographic, demographic, social, and economic conditions of the CRBRP Site area. Socioeconomic conditions discussed include employment, occupation, and income characteristics, past and current housing trends, current enrollments and capacities of school systems, capacities and usage of water and wastewater, recreation facilities, and aspects of public safety and health care. The following section describes anticipated economic and social benefits from construction and operation of the CRBRP. l l l 1 l O 8.1-21

l r TABLE 8.1.1 COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES CONSTITUTING AREA 0F STUDY Anderson Roane Knox London County County County County Clinton* Kingston* Knoxville? Lenoir City Oak Ridge ** Ila r r ima n West Knox County Area co Rockwood 10 U 1

County Seat 1

      **0ak Ridge is in Anderson and Roane counties, but most residential and commercial development lies in Anderson County, and thus, Oak Ridge is considered part of Anderson County in this analysis.
        + West Knox County Area consists of the north, northwest, and southwest sectors of Knox County as defined by the Knoxville / Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission
      . North, Northwest, and Southwest Sector Plans.

SN P8 F O O O

s /'~~'N 5 G) v

                                                                                                           )                                                                 (dI 4

1 TABLE 8.1-2 APPROXIMATE ROAD MILEAGES BETWEEN CRBRP SITE AND SURROUNDING MUNICIPALITIES

Oak Lenoir West Knox Site Clinton Ridge Kingston Harriman Rockwood Knoxville City County Area Site -

Clinton 24 - Oak Ridge 13 11 - Kingston 11 ** 20 - oc

g. Harriman 18 19 7 -

I [j Rockwood 23 ** 32 12 9 - Knoxville $3 18 26 36 43 48 - Lenoir City 17 ** 23 ** ** ** 26 6 -

Center points chosen for road mileage measurements between municipalities are as follows: Knoxville - Intersection of I40 and I-275 in Downtown Knoxville; Oak Ridge - Intersection of SR62 and SR95; Kingston - Intersection of US?J ar.d SR58; Harriman - Intersection of SR61 and SR29A; Rockwood - Intersection of SR61 and Federal Air Secondary (FAS) 2442; Clinton
Intersection of SR61 and FAS 2572; Oliver Springs - Intersection of SR61 and SR62; Lenoir City - Central Business District on USil; Loudon - Intersection of USil and SR72.

Measurements are rounded to the nearest mile.

                                     **. . applicable.

Source: Tennessee Department of Transportation, General Highway Maps E?$$ () (D

3 ka .CL 40 00 )<

wa

                                                                                                                    /cend, X TABLE S.1-3 ACTUAL AND FROJECTED POPL1ATION FOR AREA COLTTIES, URBAN AREAS,* AND RURAL AREAS, 1980-2030 5

YEAR l 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030_ 2030 Countv/ Urban / Rural t Anderson County 66,878 70,800 74,400 75,200 76,300 80,500 80,500 ; 5,239 5,100 5,300 5,400 5,400 5,800 5,800 g Citaton Oak Ridge (pt) 25,255 30,800 32,400 32,700 33,000 33,000 33,000 . Olin Springs (pt) 2,519 3,900 4,600 5,000 5,500 6,700 6,700 33,865 31,000 32,100 32,100 32,400 35,000 35,000 Rural Area Roane County 47,716 50,000 50,400 49,900 49,500 49.700 49,700 ' Harrtman 8,257 8,200 7,700 7,000 6,300 5,600 5,600 Kingston 4,367 5 400 6,900 8,100 9,500 11,000 11,000 Oak Ridge (pt) 2,297 3,200 4,200 5,300 6,700 8,300 8,300 Oliver Springs (pt) 1,083 1,700 2,000 2,200 2,300 2,900 2.900 5,74.4 5,500 5,100 4,500 3,900 3,400 3,400 Rockwood 25,967 25,800 24,500 22,800 20,800 18,500 18,500 10 Rural Knox County 318,539 333,400 350,300 353,400 358,100 367,000 367,000 182,249 183,100 186,800 190,600 194,400 195,400 198,400 Knoxville 136,290 150,300 163,500 162,800 163,700 168,600 168,600 Rural , Loudon County 28,421 30,300 30,700 30,600 30,300 29,800 29,800 l Lenotr City 5,414 9,100 9,700 10,100 10,400 10,700 10,700 l 3,937 4,200 4,300 4,200 4,100 4,000 4,000 , Loudon Rural 19,070 17,000 16,700 16,300 15,800 15,100 15,100 I I I Tennessee 1980 Census of Population, Preliminary Report.

O Bureau of the Census. ,

  *According to the 1970 Census of Populatica, the Urban population, comprises all persons Itving in places of 2,500 or more inhabitants.

8.1-24

faend. X (m q j TABLE 8.1-4 Dec. 1981 AGE DISTRIBUTION OF ANDERSON, KNOX, LOUDON, AND ROANE COUNTIES; 1980 AND 1990 Percent of Population in Each Age Category Anderson County Knox County Loudon County Roane County Age Interval 1980 1990 1980 1990 1980 1990 1980 1990 0-4 7 7 7 7 8 7 8 8 5-9 7 8 7 7 7 7 7 8 10-14 8 6 7 7 7 7 8 7 15-19 11 6 8 6 9 6 9 7 20-24 9 7 10 7 9 7 9 7 25-29 7 8 11 9 8 8 7 8 30-34 7 8 9 10 7 8 6 7 35-39 6 7 6 10 6 8 6 7 40-44 5 7 5 8 6 7 6 6 45-49 5 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 50-54 6 5 5 4 6 5 6 5 10 55-59 6 5 5 4 5 5 6 5 60-64 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 O, 65-69 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 'v/ 70-74 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 75-79 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 80-84 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 85 & over 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total Population 66,878 70,800 318,539 333,400 28,421 30,300 47,715 50,000 8.1-25

TABLE 8.1-5 EMPLOYMENT, NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE BY DCCUPATION 1978 Professional, Nonfarm Total Technical, and Managers and Sales Transport Non f a rm Service

Farm Area Emp1_oyed Related Administrators Workers Clerical Cra f t smen Operatives Operatives Laborers Workers Workers Tennessee 1,815,000 12.0 7.7 6.5 14.8 14.3 18.6 4.5 5.1 12.5 3.9

? anderson 27,920 25.6 6.8 5.7 13.4 18.0 10.4 2.5 4.6 12.2 0.8 10 r. d3 Knox 128,360 16.4 9.1 8.2 16.9 13.6 12.6 4.5 3.9 14.0 0.8 Loudon 10,120 7.8 6.1 3.3 11.5 17.6 29.5 4.1 5.9 9.5 3.9 Roane 14,050 11.6 6.2 4.4 10.6 18.0 27.4 4.4 5.6 10.8 1.0

includes household workers Source: Tennessee Department of Employment Securst:1 Tennessee Data for Af firmative Action Plans, Annual Averages 1978, February 1980 N,

                                                                                                                                                     <> n

3 C

                                                                                                                                                     >4.L MO C3 ><

ed O O O

f\ f'] [~'N O 't) CJ TABLE 8.1-6 EMPLOYMENT, NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE BY INDUSTRY 1977 1 Agriculture, Finance, Total Forestry, and Contract Transportation Wholesale and Insurance, Area Employed

Fisheries Mining Construction Manufacturing and Utilities Retail Trade Real Estate Servires Tennessee 1,282,815 0.2 0.7 5.6 38.0 5.0 26.4 5.8 18.3 co Anderson 16,097 0.1 3.4 2.5 48.3 2.6 22.4 3.8 16.9 L: Knox 98,089 0.3 6.6 10 1 0.8 25.9 4.9 32.8 5.8 22.9 N

Loudon 5,580 0.5 0.5 2.7 65.5 2.2 17.2 4.2 7.2 Roane 13,712 0.1 0.7 2.3 70.5 2.1 14.1 2.4 7.8

                        *The total employment figures are lower than those in Table 8.1-5 because government employees, railroad employees, and self-employed persons are excluded.
                       ** includes household workers Source:        U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns - Tennessee 1977 n.
                                                                                                                                                                                      *3 D.

We W >< e-a

Amond. X Dec. 1981 O TABLE 8.1-7 GE0GRAPIIIC DISTRIBUTION OF DOE PLANTS P,Y PERCENT OF TOTAL PLANT EMPLOYMEhT ORGDP* ORNL** Y-12 Plant Oak I?idge 24.0 34.7 22.9 Clinton 6.9 5.6 9.1 Oliver Springs 5.0 2.5 4.5 Harriman 8.0 2.7 5.3 Kingston 10.1 5.3 5.7 Knoxville 21.3 29.6 25.6 Lenoir City 4.8 5.1 4.5 10 Other Locations Within 10-20 miles 7.0 7.1 8.4 20-30 miles 6.7 3.7 6.7 30-40 miles 3.5 2.6 4.1 40-50 miles 0.8 0.5 1.1 over 50 miles 2.0 0.7 2.1 i O Total Plant Employment 5,974 5,876 5,884

  *0ak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant
 **0ak Ridge National Laboratory Source:    Union Carbide Corporation, Nuclear Division, April 1981.               ,

O 8.1-28 1

hnend. X Dec. 1981 O TABLE 8.1-8 l TOTAL PERSONAL INCOME AND l PER CAPITA INCOME - 1978 i County Total Personal Income Per Capita Income Tennessee $28,527,000,000 $6,547 Anderson 502,400,000 7,624 10 Knox 2,101,400,000 6,949 Loudon 163,700,000 6,002 Roane 260,200,000 5,825 4 Source: Center for Business and Economic Research, Tennessee Statistical Abstract, 1980 O i i O 8 1-29 l __. . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , . . . _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . , , . _ . __. _ _ .

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 8.1-9 GE0 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF g. DOE / CONTRACTOR PAYROLL (OCTOBER 1980) Total Percent of Payroll Payroll Oak Ridge $122,875,000 32.8 Knoxville 91,781,000 24.5 i Clinton 26,598,000 7.1 Kingston 23,975,000 6.4 Lenoir City 16,109,000 4.3 Harriman 16,109,000 4.3 i Oliver Springs 12,362,000 3.3 l 10 i Rockwood 5,994,000 1.6 - Lake City 2,622,000 0.7 Other Communities 56,193,000 15.0 i TOTAI- 374,618,000 100.0 l

The bulk of this payroll is related to DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant. Also included in these figures is DOE employment at Oak Ridge Associated Universities, DOE Oak Ridge Operations, and the DOE Technical Information Center.

Source: DOE News Release, Oak Ridge Operations, October 1980. l O 8.1-30

1 Amend. X

 ;                                                                                                                                                                          Dec. 1981 TABLE 8.1-10A HOUSING UNITS ADDED TO EXISTING HOUSING STOCK BY COUNTY

AND MUNICIPALITY IN ANDERSON COUNTY FROM 1974 - 1979 1974 Single-Family Multi-Family Mobile Homes Number Average Value Number Average Value Number Averate Value Total Units i

Anderson County 107 $21,692 2 $ 7,000 20 $ 6,307 129 Clinton 41 27,427 0 NA 0 NA 41 Oak Ridge 104 29,168 2 15,000 0 NA 106 Oliver Springs y 21,857 0 NA 0 NA 27 TOTAL 279 (92%) 4 (1%) 20 (7%) 303 1 1975 j Anderson County 171 $22,172 0 NA 75 $ 4,885 246 Clinton 55 24,463 0 NA 0 NA 55 , Oak Ridge 107 32,640 54 $16.285 0 NA 161 1 Oliver Springs y 19,919 0 NA 0 NA 43 I TOTAL 376 (74%) 54 (11%) 75 (15%) 505 t 1976 Anderson County' 231 $24,865 4 $15,000 88 $ 6,342 323 Clinton 54 26,901 10 12.240 0 NA 64 Oak Ridge 145 31,946 0 NA 0 NA 145 , Oliver Springs y 17,737 0 NA 0 NA 19 TOTAL 449 (81%) 14 (3%) 88 (16%) 551 10 l 1977 Anderson County 317 $27,554 12 $10,000 201 $ 5,904 530 i Clinton 31 28,742 0 NA 0 NA 31 i Oak Ridge 139 36,200 0 NA 0 NA 139 Oliver Springs y 23,633 0 NA 0 NA 12

TOTAL 499 (70%) 12 (2%) 201 (28%) 712 I

1978 l i Anderson County 282 $30,266 36 $10,000 298 $ 8,932 616 ! Clinton 21 35,536 0 NA 0 NA 21 Oak Ridge 115 44,663 6 15,166 0 NA 121 Oliver Springs y 22,435 0 NA 1 11,000 23 TOTAL 440 (57%) 42 (5%) 299 (381) 781 1 1 l 1979 ; I' Anderson County 247 $31.799 0 NA 266 $ 7.289 513 Clinton 14 35,607 150 $18,000 0 NA 164 Cak Ridge 109 54,013 0 NA 0 NA 109 4 Oliver Springs y 26,508 0 NA 0 NA 25 811 I TOTAL 395 (49%) 150 (181) 266 (33%)

County totals exclude municipalities NA - Not applicable

! Source: East Tennessee Development District, Nimeographed Data on Additions to Housing Stock for 1974 through 1979. I 8 1-31

Amend, X Dec. 1981 TABII 8.1-10B HOUSING UNITS ADDED TO EXISTING HOUSING STOCK BY COUNTY

AND MUNICIPALITY IN KNOX COUNTY FROM 1974 - 1979 1974 Single-Famaly Mult1-Fastly Mobtle Homes Number Average Value Number Average Value Number Average Value Total Units Knox County 741 $23,162 143 $11,354 161 $ 5,745 1,045 Knoxville 322 19,954 30 8,309 j NA 482 TOTAL 1,063 (70%) 303 (20%) 161 (10%) 1,527 1975 Knox County 992 $27,566 6 $10,833 194 $ 5,817 1,192 .

Knoxville 287 22,238 33 12,257 j NA 320 { TOTAL 1,279 (85%) 39 (2%) 194 (131) 1,512 : 1% Knox County 1,254 $27,356 12 $12,878 161 $ 4,572 1,427 328 Knoxville 310 22,9'S H 12,500 0 NA , 1,755 l TOTAL 1,564 (891) 30 (2%) 161 (91) . I 1977 Knox County 1,360 $30,951 254 $14,251 133 $ 5,883 1,747 Knoxville 343 25,864 y 14,056 0 NA 411 l 6 TOTAL 1,703 (79%) 322 (15%) 133 (6%) 2,158 l 1978 f f Knox County 1,822 $31,886 478 $14,460 148 $ 8,603 2,448 4 Knoxville 451 25,081 y 11,625 J NA 463 I TOTAL 2,273 (781) 490 (17%) 148 (51) 2,911 1979 Knox County 1,043 $35,207 1,037 $ 9,409 70 $ 8.354 2,150 Knoxville 580 32,662 20 17,000 16 9,325 616 TOTAL 1,623 (59%) 1,057 (38%) 86 (3%) 2,766

County totals exclude municipalities NA - Not applicable Source: East Tennessee Development District, Mimeographed Data on Additions to Housing Stock for 1974 through 1979.

O 8 1-32

{' 1981 TABLE 8.1-10C HOUSING UNITS ADDED TO EXISTING HOUSING STOCK BY COUNTY

AND MUNICIPALITY IN LOll DON COUNTY FROM 1974 - 1979 1974 Single-Fastly Multi-Family Mobile Homes Number Average Value Number Average Value Number Average Value Total Units Loudon County 99 $18,815 0 NA 47 $ 3,835 146 Lenoir City 13 17,500 8 $ 5,000 4 NR 25 Loudon NR NR NR NR NR NR NR TOTAL 112 (65%) 8 (5%) 51 (30%) 171 1975 Loudon County 112 $21,758 0 NA 24 $ 3,831 136 Lenoir City 1 11,805 0 NA 10 NR 11 Loudon y 20,692 0 NA 6 NR 19 TOTAL 126 (76%) 0 40 (24%) 166 1976 Loudon County 168 $18,895 0 NA 33 $ 5,544 201 i Lenoir City 10 14,000 1 $10,000 5 NR 16 l Loudon 12 21,150 0 NA 6 NR 18 f TOTAL (81%) 1 44 (19%) 235 1977 Loudon County 190 $23,399 0 NA 25 $ 3,768 215 10 Lenoir City 24 15,577 50 $14,700 4 20,000 71 Loudon J 23,375 E 17,153 5 NR 80 TOTAL 230 (63%) 102 (28%) 34 (9%) 366 1978 Loudon County 176 $22,818 0 NA 20 $11,038 196 Lenoir City 13 17,375 0 NA 7 NR 20 Loudon J 23,422 0 NA 0 NA 9 TOTAL 198 (88%) 0 27 (12%) 225 1979 Loudon County 152 NR 0 NA 36 EM 188 Ienoir City 9 NR 0 NA 0 N5 9 14udon 3 hR 0 NA 0 NA 3 TOTAL 164 (82%) 0 36 (18%) 200
County totals exclude municipalities NR - Not reported NA - Not applicable

  +Less than 1% of housing units added Lj Source: East Tennessee Development District, Mimeographed Data on Additions to Housing Stock for 1974 through 1979.

8.1-33

Amend. X TABLE 8.1-100 Dec. 1981 1 HOUSING L3ITS AIDED TO EXISTING HOUSING STOCK BY CODTY* AND MUNICIPALITY IN ROANE COLNTY FR0ff 1974 - 1979 1974 Single 42stly Multi-Family Mobile Homes Number Average Value Number Average Value Number Average Value Total !! nit s Roane County 170 NR 25 NR 185 NR 380 Harrtman 16 $20,313 32 NR 0 NA 48 Kingston 9 20,375 10 $ 8,500 0 NA 19 Rockwood JO 13,040 0 NA 15 $ 5,607 25 TOTAL 205 (431) 67 (15%) 200 (42%) 472 ! t i 1975 j Roane County 112 $22.599 0 NA 304 NR 416 Harriman 21 21,262 14 $ 6,780 1 $10,000 6 Kingston 20 16,328 12 8,500 0 NA 75 l Rockwood y 16,581 _1, 11,250 y 5,998 y TOTAL 169 (30%) 73 (13%) 320 562 i 1976 Roace County 139 $23,688 4 3 8,500 318 NR 459 Harriman 18 16,482 16 12,500 2 $ 5,500 20 l Kingston 8 22,500 0 NA 0 NA 8 i Rockwood 3 16,346 0 NA 9 3,917 35 ! TOTAL 191 (35%) 20 (4%) 329 (61%) 540 t 10 1977 , Roane County 118 $17,691 0 NA 248 NR 366 ! Harriman 20 19,655 138 NR 0 NA 158 Kingston 14 18,492 4 h1 6 $ 5,883 24 Rockwood 19 19,784 130 $16,650 J 4,662 M TOTAL 171 (24*) 272 (39%) 262 (37%) 705 ; 1978 Roane County 18 NR 0 NA 61 NR 79 Harriman 12 $23,917 8 $11,500 3 $ 2,500 23 Kingston 27 30,077 0 NA 1 3,200 28 Rockwood 16 21,469 0 NA 8 8,537 2 ; TOTAL 73 (47%) 8 (6%) 73 (47%) 154 i 1979 j Roane County 79 NR 0 NA 121 NR 200 , Harriman 4 $25,000 0 NA 4 $ 8,250 8 f Kingston 23 40,737 4 $13,000 5 12,360 32 j Rocksood JO 20,000 0 NA J 8,560 y i l TOTAL 116 (45%) 4 (2%) 135 (53%) 255 l

County totals exclude munterpalities NR - Not reported NA - Not applicable Source: East Tennessee Development District, Miscographed Data on Additions to Housing Stock for 1974 through 1979. ,

8.1-34 t

N Os A TABLE 8.1-11 EST! MATED NUMBER AND PERCENT OF HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE FOR 1970 and 1980, AND UNITS ADDED BY TYPE BETVEEN 1970 AND 1980 Units Added by Type Between 1970 1980 1970 and 1980 Single- Multi- Mobile Single- Multa- Mobile Single- Multi- Mobile Location Family Family Home Fami1L Family Home Family Family Home Anderson County 15,993(78.3%) 3,627(17.8%) 790(3.9%) 19,520(75.5%) 4,209(16.3%) 2,120(8.2%) 3,527(65%) 582(11%) 1,330(24%) Non-incorporated Area 5,514 279 711 7,440 392 2,018 1,926 113 1,307 Clinton 1.558 107 29 1,864 44c 29 306 333 0 Oak Ridge + 6,852 3,116 1 7,872 3,245 1 1,020 129 0 Oliver Springs ++ 941 54 39 1,150 54 40 209 0 1 Other Incorporated Areas 1,128 71 10 1,194 78 32 66 7 22 Knox County 71,127(76.5%) 18,971(20.4%) 2,843(3.11) 95,941(76.2%) 24,726(19.6%) 5,216(4.2%) 24,814(75%) 5,755(171) 2,373(41) Non-Incorporated Area 28,629 1,134 2,154 47,475 6,086 4,482

18,846 4,952 2,328 }Q 00 Knoxville 42,478 17,837 689 48,466 18,640 734 5,968 803 45 w

I Loudon County 7,515(89.1%) 386(4.6%) 529(6.3%) 9,264(85.5%) 558(5.1%) 1,013(9.4%) 1,749(73%) 172(7%) 484(20%) j Non-Incorporated Area 4,519 184 394 6,057 184 779 1,538 0 385 Lenoir City 1,789 118 75 1,909 209 138 120 91 63 Loudon 1,207 84 60 1,298 165 96 91 81 36 Roane County 11,369(87.2%) 9R2(7.5%) 687(5.3%) 13,349(71.3%) 1,827(9.8%) 3,556(18.9%) 1,980(35%) 845(15%) 2,869(50%) Non-Incorporated Area 5,785 384 467 7,147 445 3,160 1,362 61 2,693 j Harriman 2,757 368 29 2.951 812 50 194 444 21 Kingston 1,275 66 32 1,490 129 58 215 63 26 Rockwood 1,552 164 159 1,761 441 288 209 277 129

    + Includes part of Oak Ridge in Roane County                                                                                                                      ,
  ++ Includes part of Oliver Springs in Roane and Morgan Counties Sources:                                                                                                                                                            i

1. East Tennessee Development District, Mimeographed U.ta on Additions to Housing Stock for 1974 through First Quarter 1980. {

2 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Postal Vacancy Survey - Knoxville, Tennessee, March 1980. i

3. East Tennessee Development District, Mimeagraphed Data of Semi-Annual Apartment. Survey Suennary for Spring,1980.

4. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census,1980 Census of Population and Housing, Report PHC80-V-44, March,1981. j

5. University of Tennessee, Center for Business and Economic Research, Tennessee Statistical Abstract 1980 (5th edition), pp. 209-238.

6. State of Tennessee, Tennessee State Planning Office, Report on the Need for Housing in Tennessee 1980, Volume II: Housing Mar'et s Conditions.

Additions to the Housing Inventory g nd Future Production Needs, pp. 25, 37-39, 49, snd 67, March, 1981.

7. State of Tennassee, Tennessee State Planning Office, Report on the Need for Housing in Tennessee 1979, pp. 31, 34, 61, 64, 67, 150, 153, 156, :

and 174, July 1979. ! n.

                                                                                                                                                    =  ~3 w.

40 C3 >< w

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 8.1-12 Il0USING: NUMBER, VACANCY RATES, AND RANGE OF RENTS OF APARTMENTS IN WESTERN PART OF KNOX COUNTY BY APARTMENT COMPLEX

JANUARY 1981 RANGE OF APARTMENT YEAR TOTAL VACANCY RENT NA'!E COMPLETED UNITS NUMBER PERCENT (DOLLARS)

Bear Creek

64 2 3.1 275 Belle Tara 8 0 0 240 Big Oak 150 0 0 202 - 269 Brendon Park 1975 312 24 7.7 190 - 295 Cambridge Arms 1965 48 1 2.1 207 - 237 Capella 1974 200 5 2.5 210 - 295 }

Carlton Square

49 1 2.0 255 - 325 .

Carlton Towers ' c.64 126 0 0 167 - 348 I Cedar Bluff

192 53 27.6 245 - 370 .

Cedar Springs 92 0 0 231 - 404 !' 10 Cherokee West NR 34 0 0 175 - 265 Concord h3 80 10 12.5 225 - 275 i LeRoy Cobble Duple::es 8 0 0 175 - 215 . Colonial Townhouse Park 1967 30 6 20.0 320 - 330 ! Concepts 21

432 74 17.1 220 - 365 j Country Club 1974 232 21 9.1 225 - 330 l Country Oaks
350 101 28.9 245 - 420 Creekwood I 80 19 23.8 310 - 365 l 320 - 350 Creekwood IV
45 5 11.1 Crestridge 57 123 4 3.3 195 - 285 Crossroads West NR 168 4 2.4 190 - 285 Dawn Apartments 24 1 4.2 190 - 285 Deane Hill 1975 186 4 2.2 230 - 350 Deane 11i11 Duplexes
8 0 0 350 - 365 Echo Valley Duplexes 6 0 0 335 - 460 900 Flanders Lane 4 0 0 250 - 265 i Forest Ifills Village
182 3 1.6 170 - 235 l Fox Lonas Duplexes 10 1 10.0 350 - 375 foxfire West 1974 75 4 5.3 205 - 265 Gleason Road 12 0 0 265 Greentree 1974 146 7 4.8 225 - 330 llolly Hills
20 1 5.0 200 - 230 Kenwood 1963 50 1 2.0 90 - 300 Kingston Manor
18 0 0 160 - 250 Kingston Square 1974 228 0 0 220 - 325 Londontown 1974 208 1 .5 197 - 325 1212 Parkhill Circle 4 0 0 250 (Continued) 8.1- 36

Amend. X Dec. 1981 p ( j TABLE 8.1-12 (Continued) RANGE OF APARTMENT YEAR TOTAL VACANCY RENT NAME COMPLETED UNITS NUMBER PERCENT (DOLLARS) The Pines

152 0 0 255 - 340 Pine Bluff
23 2 8.7 205 Raillery 1974 200 1 .5 210 - 320 Raintree Apartments
36 2 5.6 275 Regency Townhouses
20 20 100.0 335 Sans Souci 1974 216 2 .9 237 - 335 Sequoyah Square 1971 164 0 0 207 - 421 Sequoyah Village
136 0 0 160 - 225 Summerwood
9 0 0 255 Summit Chase
52 5 9.6 275 - 315 Summit Chase II
24 0 0 265 - 299 Statesview
153 2 1.3 245 - 335 Sunflower 1974 172 5 2.9 220 - 265 Sutters Mill 1975 252 5 2.0 225 - 310 Taliluna Townhouses
11 5 45.5 395 - 590 Timbers West 1975 321 44 13.7 190 - 300 Timberwood
12 3 25.0 325 Twin Pine West 67 0 0 335 - 415

()s g, Village Green Duplexes Walker Springs

?-

2 0 0 308 10 1974 168 0 0 210 - 345 Wesbridge 1975 455 27 0 199 - 324 West Cliff NR 192 71 40.0 245 - 475 West Gate Terrace NR 156 5 3.2 230 - 305 West Hills Park Duplexes

14 0 0 250 - 260 West Hills Village 1975 226 5 2.2 199 - 343 West Towne Manor NR 154 4 2.6 250 - 300 Westfield Towr. houses NR 58 0 0 245 Westview Towers 1975 240 0 0 157 - 276 Westwood ? 199 11 5.5 245 - 370 Williamsburg Townhouses NR 24 0 0 289 Windover 1974 271 0 0 235 - 400 Woodberry
24 1 4.2 230 Woodview Terrace
140 0 0 285 - 330 Wrights Ferry Road > 12 3 25.0 215 - 245 8,359 576 6.9

     +The Western Part of Knox County is defined by the Knoxville Apartment Council as the sector confined by the boundaries of the Oak Ridge Highway to the north, Knox County line to the west, Tennessee River to the south, and Concord Avenue to the east.

A Units constructed af ter October 1975 (-- NR Not Reported

     ** Does not include units under construction Source: Knoxville Apartment Council, Market Survey January, 1981, Home Builder's Association of Greater Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee 8.1-37

TAllLE 8.1-13 GROWTil 0F MOIII LE ilOME USE IN ANDERSON, KNOX, LOUDON, AND ROANE COUNTIES FROM 1960 TO 1980

~~

SUfiiiEiISUlIIIfE (F TOT 5}IUUUiliiT5U SUfiBER MOBILE TOTAL Oddlil'IIEU NUMBER MOB 1LE F TOTAL OCCUPIED AREA IlOMES 1100 SING UNITS 110MES IlOUSING UNITS 110MES 110US'NG UNITS Anderson 173 1.I 790 4.I 2,120 8.2 Knox 881 1.2 2,843 3.2 5,216 4.2 Loudon 114 1.7 529 6.7 1,013 9.4 10 L, Roane 243 2.3 687 5.7 3,556 18.9 m Tennessee 9,792 1.0 48,418 4.0 NA NA Sources:

1. East Tennessee Development District, Mimeographed Data on Additions to llousing Stock for 1974 through First Quarter 1980.

2. U.S. Department of Ilousing and Urban Development, Postal Vacancy Survey - Knoxville, Tennessee, March 1980.

3. University of Tennessee, Center for Business and Economic Research, Tennessee Statistical Abstract 1980 (5th edition), pp. 209-238.

4. State of Tennessee, Tennessee State Planning Office, Report on the Need for llousing in Tennessee 1980 3 Volume II: llousing Market Conditions, Aibli t i ons to the llousing Inventory, and Future Production Needs, pp. 25, 37-39, 49, and 67, March, 1981.

5. State of Tennessee, Tennessee State Planning Office, Rpport on the Need for llousing in a Tennessee 1979, pp. 31, 34, 61, 64, 67, 150, 153, 156, and 174, July 1979. @

                                                                                                                                                                                            'a a-P O                                                                                                                        O                                                     O

l I. i i l i i i 1 i TABLE 8.1-14 ! DISTRIBbfl0N OF MOBILE 110MES IN ANDERSON, KNOX, LOUDON, AND ROANE COUNTIES IN 1980 l i PERCENTAGE AREA TOTAL MOBILE UNITS RURAL OF TOTAL 10 Anderson 2,120 2,018 95% l Y Knox 5,216 4,482 86% 1 Loudon 1,013 779 77% Roane 3,556 3,160 89% i I 4 EN Pa F

TABLE 8.1-15 SCHOOL SYSTEMS: CAPACITY AND ENkO111 TENT Of AREA SCHOOLS BY SYSTEM AND CRADE: 1980-1981 SCHOGL YEAR

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total System K 1 Anderson capacity 442 530 539 530 548 1,501 1,501 651 653 618 645 618 500 9,278 514 537 1,029 1,029 626 626 592 626 592 400 8,032 Enrollment 429 514 523 Clinton 138 160 117 149 160 too 181 1,065 Capacity 140 135 157 905 Enrollment 116 134 99 124 Dak kidge 372 391 409 477 501 496 496 490 515 508 583 602 6,200 Capactty 360 38h 406 401 405 396 417 415 475 490 5,042 Enrollment 291 302 316 342 Roane 428 564 578 593 592 564 571 565 578 571 52R 535 471 7,139 Capacity 552 528 535 511 538 530 495 496 437 6,652 Enrollment 404 530 541 555 Harraman 190 182 166 204 201 270 251 217 204 2,665 Capacity 127 218 217 214 2,204 10 182 178 168 156 149 135 108 164 226 207 178 168 Enrollment 125 OU Enva**

1,148 1,042 1,043 1,043 1,?58 1,148 1,399 1,375 1,345 1,271 1,254 1,118 969 15,113 g- Capacity 15,203 Enrollment 1,160 1,053 1,054 1,054 1,069 1,160 1,312 1,388 1,358 1,251 1,266 1,129 949 g. O Loudon 300 122 409 383 335 370 364 376 346 225 225 190 161 3,806 capacity Enrollment 299 122 389 373 325 350 367 384 346 225 225 190 161 3,756 Leoolr City 136 106 100 96 297 237 241 213 2,057 Capacity 106 118 133 139 135 110 136 106 100 96 297 237 141 213 1,934 Enrollment 106 118 110 114

     *First five months of school year.
     *40nly the north, northwest, and southwest sectors of the Knox School System.

Note: The K-12 enrollment and capacity fi2ures for the Knoxville City System are not included in this table because they do not maintato capacity numbers on a grade by grade basis. The June 1980 total system enrollment was 25,931 students with a system capacity to acccamodate about 37,800 students. Source: TVA phone survey of school system superintendents, September 1981. S$ ri rD

                                                                                                                                         *3 pa .CL Y) 03 ><

wa O O O

Amend, X [') Dec. 1981 v TABLE 8.1-16 WATER SYSTEMS: SOURCE. TREATMENT CAPACITY AND CONSUMPTION OF WATER SUPPLY IN AREA 0F MUNICIPALITi 1981 System (Utility Treatment (Pumping) Consumption (Average) District) _ Source Capacity (gpd) (gpd) Anderson Co Clinton Clinch River 2,160,000 1,600,t,00 i DOE (Oak Ridge)* Clinch River 24,000,000 14,000,000 Oliver Springs Springs 1,200,000 570,000 Hallsdale-Powell Springs, Beaver Creek and Clinch River 4,020,000 2,800,000 l Norris Clear Creek 430,000 260,000 l First Springs. Hallsdale-Powell** I U.D. and Anderson Co. U.B. 300,000 300,000 l Roane Co Kingston Watts Bar Lake 2,000,000 700,000 l 10 Harriman Emory River 3,500,000 1,900,000 Rockwood Watts Bar Lake 6,000,000 3,000,000 t Cumberland Watts Bar Lake 864,000 450,000 l 1 Knox Co Knoxville Tennessee River 50,000,000 33,000,000 j First Springs and Tenressee River 5,000,000 3,000,000 West Knox Clinch River 6,500,000 3,500,000 l Loudon Co d Loudon Lenoir City Springs and Tennessee River Tennessee River 2,100,000 3,000,000 750,000 800,000 Dixie-Lee Springs and Lenoir City 600,t40 400,000 g Paney*** Springs 200,000 200,000 !

                  *The city of Oak Ridge obtains its entire water supply from DOE's treatment facilities.

Present consumption for the city of Oak Ridge averages approximately 4.3 agd (included in the 14 mgd in table above).

                 **The Hallsdale-Powell Utility District could sell an additional 2,600,000 gpd to the First Utility District of Anderson County if it became necessary.
                ***The Piney Utility District is investigating a spring with a 2,000,000 gpd capacity for use in the future. In addition, they are considering a service connection agree-ment with the Tellico Area Service System.

Source: TVA phone survey of water system managers or consulting engineers, April 1981. I v 8.1-41

                                                                                              /
                                                  >s Amend. X Dec. 1981 h #

TABLE'%.1-17 WASTEWATER SYSTEMS: fTPE, TREATMENT CAPACITY AND USAGE OF WASTEWATER TREAThiNT IN AREA BY Mt'NICIPALITY f 1981-Treatment _(Pmping) Average 24pacity Daily Flow Utility District Treatment Type (zpd) (gpd) Anderson Co Clinton Primary and Secondary 1,250,000 850,000 Oak Ridge

Primary and Secondary 6,500,003 3,650,000 oliver Springs Frie.ary and Secondary 1,000,000 353,000 First Prfoary cnd !cecndary 'N ,000 30,000 Roane Co Kin g s t ong-* Primary 600,000 500,000 Harriman Primary 1,700,000 1,700,000 Rockwood Primary and Secondary , ,2,000,000 1,500,000 0 Knox Co KnoxvQle Primary and Sacondary 50,000,000 40,000,000 First Primary and Secondary 1,5ca,000 800,000 West Knox Primary, Secondary and Tertiary 150,000 NA Loudon Co Loudon Primry and 5econday 1,000,000 600,000 Lenotr City Primary and Secondary 2,000,000 500,*00

 *The city of Oak Ridge has under construction a new M mgd tertia.y treatment plant.
**The city of Kingston plans to build a new 1.3 mgd secondary treatment plant during 1982.
 'Harriman plans to construct a 4.5 med matondary treatment plant by 1984.

The First Utility District of Knox Courty and the West Knox Utility District have part of their sewage treated by the City of Knoxville. The West Knox Utility District has a part of their sewage treated by the city of Knoxville. NA - Not avatlable Source: TVA phone survey ot wutew ter sys tem managers or consulting angineers, April 1981. O 8.1-42

i " 5,

                                                                                                                        's    a       ,

a D.

l e

1 TABLE 8.1-18 IIEALTII CARE: NUMBER AND LOCATION OF Sil0RT-TERM IIOSPITALS IN AREA 1981 llospital Beds Physicians + Dentists + Number Number Number Licensed Per Occupancy Per Per Place Beds 1,000 (%) Number 1,000 Number 1,000 ). Anderson 285 4.23 76.0 87 1.29 37 0.56 County o3 Roane 176 3.63 63.6 32 0.66 21 0.43 { L County E

  "                             2,437 Knox                               7.62         76.8         652         2.04       214          0.67 County                                                                                                              10 Loudon                  50         1.75         63.8          13         0.46        11          0.39 County Tennessee          25,653

73.6 * * *
ETDD** 4,?.42 ** 73.9 i

             *Not available.
            ** Eastern Tennessee Development District; encompasses a 16-county area.
             + Practicing.

oN no

3 Source: Tennessee Department of Public lfcalth, State Center for llealth --

Statistics, Nashville, Tennessee, March 1981. Ex

TABLE f>.1-19 PUBLIC SAFETY: NUMBER AND LOCATION OF LAW ENFORCEt!ENT OFFICERS AND FIRErlEN IN AREA Firemen Law Enforcement Officers / Volunteer and/or Location Officers 1000 Population Full-Time Paid on Call Anderson County

21 .62 0 80 Clinton 12 2.29 11 25 Oak Ridge 42 1.53 42 0 10

, Knox County

73 .53 9** 48**

k 1 Knoxvi . 307 1.68 366 0 n Loudon ..a y2 11 .58 0 50 Lenttr City 9 1.66 0 30 Roar.2 County

13 0.50 0 80 Kingston 7 1.60 5 18 Harriman 13 1.57 19 12 Rockwood 13 2.26 11 10 SN nm
Exclusive of municipalities R

 ** West Knox County only                                                                                 G-
                                                                                                          ,c3

Source: TVA survey of police and fire departments, June and July 1981.

O O O ,,

Amend. X O Dec. 1981 i ! NJ TABII 8.1-20 EXISTING COMMUNITY RECREATION FACILITIES / PROGRAMS IN THE CRBRP AREA Softball- Regulation Ntde+r Operating Tennis Basketball Youth BB Baseball Ovimmit.g Community Park Status Courts Courts Fields Fields Pools Centers Acreage Loudon County Lenoir City Patt-time 10 2 10 2 - 1 91 Loudon Part-time 3 2 2 - 1 - 21 Greenback Part-time - - 1 - - 1 4 Philadelphia Part-time 2 2 1 - - - 20 Total 15 6 14 2 1 2 136 Roane County Roane County Part-time - - 1 - - - 219 Rockwood Full-time 2 3 3 1 1 1 17 Harriman Part-time 8 9 6 1 1 1 63 10 Kingston Part-time 4 2 5 1 1 1 55 Total 14 14 15 3 3 3 354 Anderson County Clinton Full-time 9 2 8 1 1 1 58 Anderson County Part-time - 1 1 - - I k39 Oliver Springs Part-time 4 1 2 1 - - 7 Oak Ridge Full-time 28 10 20 2 1 2 1,200 Norris Part-time 4 1 - - - - 22 Total 45 15 31 4 2 4 1,526 O)' ( Knox County City of Knoxville Full-time 104 99 129 36 5 23 2,115 Knox County Full-time 23 12 37 8 3 - 1,652 Total 127 111 166 E 8 23 3,767 Sources:

1. Knoxville / Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission, Inventory of City of Ynoxville Public Rcreation Facilities, May 1981.

2. East Tennessee Development .)istrict, Becreation Facilities Inventory, March 1981.

3. Knox County Office of Welfare Maintenance, Knox County Public Recreation Facility Inventory, March 1981.

4. State of Tennessee, Tennessee Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan, Final Report-Appendix III, August 1977.

(v 8.1-45

LEGEND l O AK RtOGE Y-12 PLANT CAMPBELL COUNTY OAK RIDGE G ASEOUS OtFFUSION Pt ANT * (K 25) 3 OAK RIDGE N ATION AL LABORATORY LAK (X -lO) f"- CITY g k OAK R1DGE MUN'CfPAL BUILDING (i y .-._._._. I b

SITE 7s Q'

( ButLT - UP AREA \ CL2r.N3N / h lNTERSTATE INTERCHANGE MORGA \ '!/ . COUNTY OUVER . ; f . ,, , SPA NM:, ' ^' . .!:: g

      ---- CITY LIMITS                                                                                 ..'                                                                     f          3                           ,
                                                                                              ** /[!([',

i IMPACT AREA

                                                                                                                       \.                                                                        g

( 9 PLACE WITHIN THE IMPACT ARE 7' . . . . .

                                                                                                                                                                .,, ; $M               ,

Q k

                                                                                                                               - ,,                           -i. '                                        U              p f-                     'f                                                                                               , , f/,

i e O PLACE OursioE TnE iNeAC . . ,

                                                                                                                                                            }ff,                              #
 .            AREA                                J         <              ,j f;gi,- 'O \ 04                      f                                                        ) ,', 77 f,                          ,

T ~ ? .' I.:.. . .:?.?*,., of N l~ C****'" ?:':

                                                                                                                                                                        +                                            /
                               , *5.g) :llll. H AW 'M%

y'

                                                                         ,2
                                                                                                    \Q                                                   ll l_;         ,$ , p 9 f)  3
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ,8
                                                                                                                                                                                                             ~
                         . .; r ::                                   s                               g e             ,, v IO

l. e

                                                                                                            \
                                                                                                                                                          'll                                          j

ja'

                      . ::.   = x .a                                                       !                          ,         ..     .                  . ,

OA CO / N k '

'C.

LE N 3 5-oi2 34 5 H H F-1 i s g ,, , 5- BLOUNT SCALE Or wtES f ';;i::.i'.':hW::: ,, Q 3-

                                                           }}^G     0                         touoON
                                                                                                                              )
                                   /
                 'M.{ %                              ./

0 l lr '

}'

x. Q<dr-s J^ q -

't.

L. -

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            ? f*

Og

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            .-. P e

co x Figure 8.1-1 AREA COUNTIES NID MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES 1 O O O

O O O i CUNT.N j \ p# 01

                                                                                                                                  .mu*                            g s                                                                                                   e N.                        '\

M g HARRiasAN c-O N Npr > Mx \ g ,, g \. 4

                                                                                                                           >T\  ,

12

_ e_ . 10 m * = , _ -- , IGNGST.N % e I L R LEGEND *

                                                                                                                                                           - - : "lain,*,

j se = m. m. 4 LANE DM.EO m 2 LANE

CT O ICE IS (DCATED ee 2 LANE CURVING

                                                                        ]      012345 HHH
                                                                                                         ' lO l

15

                                                                                                                                                            *, T jy Q *ENEm s

SITE o 5 l SCALE OF MILES E?S" Pa 2 Figure 8.1-2 DIAGRAM DEPICTING SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ORBRP h* SITE AND SURROUNDING MUNICIPALITIES l

0 1 Wo3C*

E S M F 'L Nn* *eoS e

OOf H O i'f, - NS EOE LI

                                                       \                                                                                          ITH B

O AT

g. CD 1 MONS ELA K ei RESAN Q)\

UHMT TT U NTIEC s F T

u. F OSP Y E M'-

ODS

                                 .                               y'                    , . j
                                                                                                                 /- a s uo   3 r

NEYR OPIT N S O

                                                                                                                   '- ,~

I

                                                                                 /                                                   u            TEL         F                A
                                                                                     /, ,

a A c ADT C I E

                                                                    "+                                           '

s OLUY T R s p j,Q, I es LLI GL LWN I I A

                          ,N                                 _

A IB N Egf *p i

                                                                                                         ,                                        UEST T

STA T CI XU I I I gAf

g. +

,\

1,,E '

                                                                                                                   \
                                                                                                                    /

ASES S E T I

                            "                                                        ~

S

                                                                                                    $            '{**

( E M j O 7,, , #, O s Q'}fx/- H { s . ' E" /. 7 E N ' ; ' L O ', T N g s l h(' ' I U L s

                                                                     -                                                 e\

f%mn B O

              ~                                                                            ..                                                                                   M N"
                                                     /g
                                                                              \(                                                                                        .

J' uCb . L L

                   \*)N                                     q R gc, 'i O, #, ,,                 '
                                                                                                                    '            ,~~g N

o ou u A I T l O h-

                                                                                                                             ;                                                  t yl g , ,'
                                                                                            .\

O ' ot E

                    /.                                           .
                                                                                                             )

i s

                                                                                                                             " '                               -                 T
                                                                                  's,"                                 s
                                                                                                                                                               -                0 m                                  - ['                                 /                          ,
                                                                                                                                        ,s          "

J s P D

                      /                                               /,                                                 ,
                                                                                                                                                                     -           l t
                           /   -                                           "7                         'f e                                       A y'                                                   .                                                  Uot                                   Gl r

_ e/, f I

                                                                                                                                           }r/ f N

A T v

w u

s L

                                                                                                                                                 .[,>[,.o S

I X f E f r,~ - f.

                                                                                                                                                                 -                 3

4, 1 T f 'f1 8 N

A e L P Y R *

                                                                                                                                                 .#                                 r O

N O l s T A R G N e D s s r a { i u g

/_

U O w s ' F FI D B A L L tu B E G N A a P t t e

                                                                                                                   /                    ,/M                                        F T

N s L L O 4 v m , . A P L O E U A N C A P C R E o w l ( 2 S T A N A E T N a e 1 A U R I n' Y G N M A E s o v f M E E E E P T G G G U A C O D) D Dt T S iu u o %. e t R R5 R' ) R T R n K 2- R C x , L E v T s t M A A A - A , I U T o o K C N c n C O( C (X , 9 I t

                                                                            ]
                                        )                  -

b D N I k g ['/, kE b', E G E L m ~ j,

Amend. X Doc. 1981 O

U/ 8.2 ANTICIPATED ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL BENEFITS The anticipated benefits which will be derived from the construction and operation of the CRBRP can be reviewed in two categories. First are those primary benefits which are derived directly from meeting the objective of the proposed facility--to provide a vital step in the devel-opment of a commercial breeder reactor industry which is of utmost importance to the nation in general. In addition, there are secondary benefits which, although not in themselves justification for the existence of the CRBRP Project, involve economic stimuli to the area in terms of employment and income. 8.2.1 PRIMARY BENEFITS Although the production of power has been the one primary benefit most 10 often cited as justification for commercial power plant construction in the past, it is of relatively little importance in this case due to the fact that the CRBRP is a demonstration plant. There are greater and more far v reaching benefits that will have long range effects upon the entire nation which command more emphasis in this study. The primary purpose of the project is to establish the viability of the IJ1FBR as a reliable, safe, and environmentally acceptable source of electrical energy, and to provide a major contribution to the technical knowledge that is necessary to establish a commercial LMFBR industry. One of the major resulting benefits, or course, is the more efficient use of raw uranium ore and the assurance of an extended supply of fissile material far beyond that attainable with present day water and gas cooled ! reactors. As a further result, this will reduce the strain now being placed upon the rapidly decreasing known supplies of petroleum and natural gas. More importantly, it will reduce the dependence of the United States upon those nations which are now supplying those resources and at the same time improve the country's balance of payments. 'O , 8.2-1

Amend. X Dec. 1981 Although these kinds of benefits are long range, and perhaps not as

 " measurable" as those of employment and income, they are as real as the relatively short range stimulus to the regional economy and must be weighed heavily on the benefit side of a cost / benefit analysis.

This section will concern itself with the detail of secondary effects of plant construction and operation with its consequent impact upon the economic and social structure of communities in the more immediate area. 8.2.2 SECONDARY BENEFITS In addition to the primary benefits of national importance resulting from the advancement of breeder technology are various secondary benefits. One is the revenue produced from the electrical output of the plant. This estimated revenue through the 5-year demonstration period is $264 million (1981 dollars). This amount, to be reimbursed by TVA, is the same as the highest incremental cost TVA would have incurred at genera-ting plants on its system which it would otherwise have used for produc-ing the same amount of energy or which it would have incurred in acquiring such energy from other sources through interchenge and/or purchase. The total revenue produced from electrical output over the potential 30-year life of the plant can be estimated as 1.95 billion (1981 dollars). Additional secondary benefits include impacts upon the economy and social structure of the area which are common to any project of this size. These types of benefits of a more local nature are presented in the l [ following subsections. i O 8.2-2 L

Amend. X Dec. 1981 /O 8.2.2.1 DIRECT EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME O One of the main secondary benefits from any project the size of the CRBRP Project is the effect it will have in terms of economic expansion, More specifically, how many new jobs it will create and, consequently, how much it will add to local income. (The estimated number of persons required for the construction and operation phases of the CRBRP Project are presented in Table 8.2-1. ) Estimated income, based on 1981 dollar values, is shown in Table 8.2-2. The total income which can be expected to be generated by the construc-tion force alone is $352,100,000 with an additional $51,200,000 and

  $92,700,000 for the operations and project office (including contractor support ') groups, respectively, through 1995. The single largest amount of annual income, $119,200,000, will occur during the peak year of con-struction activity. The combined total income for all groups over the       10 14-year period amounts to $496,000,000.

O v Considering the long-term benefits, the salaries of the operational force can be extended over the 30-year life of the plant. For example, in addition to the initial 14-year period outlined in Table 8.2-2, the permanent employees can expect to receive another $117,300,000 between 1995 and 2018. This results in a total of $613,300,000 received from wages and salar'~s during construction and operation of the plant. The above figures are useful in comparing relative contributions of individual segments of the work force. 8.2.2.2 INDUCED EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME There are a variety of effects that cannot be directly attributed to the increased employment or income created by a new nuclear facility. This is evidenced by the many recent attempts to measure indirect or

  " induced" impact with the aid of economic and employment multipliers.

b o 8.2-3

Amend. X Dec. 1981 The Appalachian Regional Commission has derived the following employ-ment multipliers for the study area:1 Anderson County,1.75; Roane County, 2.08; Knox County, 2.59; and Loudon County,1.93 (ratio of total employment to basic employment). These are fairly consistent with the more general findings of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States which found that 68 additional people were employed in non-manufacturing jobs for every 100 new factory workers in a town (an employment multiplier of 1.68). Such estimates should therefore provide some indication of the influence of the CRBRP Project on the local economy. Adjusting these multipliers for employment growth and applying them to the expected schedule of relocated direct and relatively permanent 10 employment for CRBRP Project Operations and Project Office results in the increases of jobs in other employment sectors summarized in Table 8.2-3. (See Section 8.3.2. I for a discussion of relocation.) Using the 1979 average retail business salary for the Knoxville Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area of $7,536, an estimate of $8,356 (1981 dollars) for the average annual salary per each induced employee can be used. (The additional annual incomes displayed in Table 8.2-4 will be generated by the CRBRP Project over and above the direct salaries paid to project employees . Total income for the 14-year period is $6,910,000.) Between 1995 and 2018 the indirect employment induced by CRBRP plant operations employment will result in additional income of $14,414,000 in the four-county area. Adding the total indirect and direct income generated by the CRBRP Project results in total payroll benefits to the area of $634,624,500. 9 8.2-4

1 1 1 Amend.:X { Dec. 1981 I 8.2.2.3 TAXES AND OTHER REVENUES I The CRBRP will be owned by and located on land of the U.S. Government. Under existing laws, neither the plant nor the land utilized for the plant site will be subject to state or local ad valorem taxes levied on privately owned real and personal property. Also,' material, supplies and equipment l which become a component of the plant and its associated distribution l system are exempt from sales and use taxes levied under the Tennessee Retailers Sales Tax Act. Other sources of tax benefits and revenues ) to the state and local governments appear to be: i 1 l 1. Financial assistancc payments by DOE pursuant to the Atomic

Energy Community Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sec. 2301, et seq.): 2. In lieu of tax payments by TVA pursuant to the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of -1933 (42 U.S.C. Sec 831, et seq.)

at such time as TVA may pay for and take permanent custody 10 , of the CRBRP and thereafter own and operate it as part of its power system. Such a transfer from DOE to TVA 'is not anticipated before 1995 at the earliest. j 3. Sales or use taxes on materials, supplies and equipment acquired for use in constructing the plant, but which do not become a component of the plant itself or of the related distribution system; l 4. Federal school impact aid from P.L. 81-874. Appropriations I for FY 1982 are currently under Congressional review, and l the future of such payments is in question; i l 5. Direct and indirect taxes on or resulting from additional wages and salaries, business activities and private property values i attributable to employment and expenditures related to l construction and operation of the plant. ! 8.2-5 l i i

   . _ ._,._-._. _ _ _ .._,-. _ __ _                              _ , _ - _       . _ _ ~ _ . - . _ . . . . - _ . . _ . - _ , ,           . - . _ , _ . , . _ _ _

Amend. X Dec. 1981 The above additions to the state and local resources may be considered a minimal factor in the net benefit / cost equation. It is only a small part of the overall contribution the CRBRP will make to the development of a whole new industry, research, nationwide employment and total environmental enhancement. It is this much broader aspect of the Project as outlined here, that results in the benefits far outweighing the local benefits outlined here, that results in the benefits far outweighing the l costs in the final analysis. l The revenues from types one through four outlined above cannot be esti-mated at this time. Ilowever, estimates of selected tax benefits resulting from the estimated peak inmoving population of type five for each of the local government jurisdictions in the impact area are summarized in Table 8.2-5. It should be emphasized that these data do not represent an exhaustive list of revenues and should not, therefore, be considered 10 a prediction of total fiscal impact. They do, however, provide insight into the relative magnitude of the CRBRP Project's influence on the local fiscal situation by emphasizing selected major revenues from the peak population influx. A discussion of the methodolody utilized in the analysis and a more detailed presentation of selected revenues and expenditures are presented in Section 3.0 of Appendix C. No attempt was made in this analysis to estimate any payments in lieu of taxes under categories 1 and 2 above. The analysis is directed toward a forecast of those socioeconomic effects upon the local area which might result from the addition of CRBHP It is in no way intended as a pre-determination by DOE concerning the need for or amount of financial assistance under the Community Act. 8.2-6 O

p ,

         's                                                           j                                                  N.,)

TABLE 8.2-1 NEW EMPLOYMENT: SCHEDULE OF DIRECT EMPLOYMENT FOR THE CRBRP PROJECT BY TYPE OF EMPLOYEE

Type of Construction Phase (year a f ter sta rt)** Operation Phase (year after start up)++

Employee 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Manuals 86 693 2,551 3,835 2,924 883 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Manuals 211 388 546 685 655 398 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subcontractors 304 210 190 163 244 178 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRBRP Project 267* 274 256 240 240 223 201 141 109 81 54 44 25 0 Office Contractor Support 189 190 188 181 172 169 148 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 Personnel Operations Personnel 0 6 13 71 140 222 282 255 247 246 246 246 246 246 All types of 971 1,761 3,744 5,175 4,375 2,073 790 483 356 327 300 290 271 246 Employees

Reported numbers are yearly averages.

 ** Site preparation assumed to commence in 1981.
  +237 project of fice staf f and 142 contractor support personnel were already living in the project area as of February 1981.
 ++ Plant operation expected to begin in 1988.                                                                             gg PO
                                                                                                                           .2

TABLE 8.2-2 INCOME: SCHEDULE OF DIRECf EMPLOYMENT INCOME FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION PilASES OF THE CRBRP PROJECT BY TYPE OF EMPLOYEE (Million Dollars)1-Construction Phase (year after start)** Operation Phase (year af ter start up) Construc-tion Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Income 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Manuals

1.9 15.3 56.4 84.9 64.7 19.6 1.2 244.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non Manuals
5.5 10.2 14.3 18.0 17.2 10.4 2.1 77.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subcontractors 7.0 4.9 4.4 3.8 5.7 4.1 .5 30.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRBRP Project" 6.5 6.7 6.3 5.9 5.9 5.4 5.9 42.6 3.5 2.7 2.0 1.3 1.1 .6 0 Office Contractor Support" 5.3 5.3 6.3 5.1 4.9 4.8 4.5 36.2 2.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Personnel Operations Personnel" 0 .1 .3 1.5 2.9 4.6 5.9 15.3 5.3 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 All Types of 26.2 42.5 88.0 119.2 101.3 40.9 20.1 446.2 11.5 7.8 7.1 6.4 6.2 5.7 5.1 Employment

Rounded to nearest $100,000, based on constant 1981 income numbers.

k* Site preparation assumed to commence in 1981, assumed plant start up in 1988.

+ Letter, Dunham, J. P., Superintendent of Construction, Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation to Chidlaw, R. A., Assistant Director for Construction, Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Project                                                                  ? $"

Office, June 1981. P S' ++ Letter, Copeland, Raymond L., Acting Assistant Director for Public Safety, Clinch River Breeder J Reactor Plant Project Of fice to DeVeny, George, TVA, April 24, 1981. $x The yearly income will remain constant at about 5.1 million throughout the remaining 30 year life of the plant from the seventh year af ter start up. O O O

0 N_) bl TABLE 8.2-3 NEW EMPLOYMENT: ESTIMATED SCllEDULE OF INDIRECT EMPLOYMENT FOR THE CRBRP PROJECT

Construction Phase (year after start) Operation Phase (year af ter start up) 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 1

_2 7 1 17 27 24 31 48 69 75 77 75 75 75 75 75 75 oo @ 10 e

  *The number of indirect workers hired during the construction phase is based on the number of relocated direct relatively permanent workers hired by Contractor Support, Operations, and Project Of fice Staf fs. A 50 percent mover rate was used for employees over and above the number of employees living in the project area for the employment groups listed above as of February 1981. A 0.6 multiplier was used for calculating indirect employment by year with 75 percent of indirect workers hired within the current year and 25 percent the following year.

NN PB

                                                                                                               ~ ."

X

TABLE 8.2-4 NEW INCOME: ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF INDIRECT EMPLOYMENT INCOME FOR TifE CRBRP PROJECT (Thousand Dollars) Construction Phase Operation Phase Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Income 142.1 225.6 200.5 259.0 401.1 576.6 701.9 643.4 626.7 626.7 626.7 626.7 626.7 626.7 6910.4 10 Y 5 Based on average annual salary of $8,356 and constant 1981 income numbers. Pe A l O O O

Anend. X Dec. 1981~ - TABLE 8.2-5

SELECTED REVENUES.RESULTING FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX DURING CONSTRUCTION *

(hundreds of dollars)

!                                                               Project Related                    Project Related                 .

Location General Fund Revenues ** School Fund Revenues *** Totals Clinton 11,300 18,800 30,100 Oak Ridge 80,800 101,800 -182,600

                                                                                                                                       'l Lenoir City                                              14,000                           20,900                 34,900 Kingston                                                 22,100                               NA                 22,100

! Rockwood 9,800 NA 9,800 Harriman 5,600 29,800 35,400 f 10 Anderson County 43,700 72,900 -116,600

j. Knox County 68,600 272,800 341,400

) Loudon County 11,900 44,800 56,700 Roane County 26,800 101,700 128,500 Note: All figures are in 1981 dollars. 1

Twenty-five percent mover rate during estimated peak year of construction.

d l ** Includes property tax, sales tax, beer and beverage tax, fines, fees, and charges.

             *** Includes property tax, sales tax, and State foundation and equalization funds.

I NA = Not applicable. t O 8.2-11 1 i

Amend. X Dec. 1931 8.3 ANTICIPATED ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COSTS If the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant is to be an asset to the area and the nation as a whole, the benefits derived from the construction and operation must ultimately exceed the costs. These costs include not only the capital investment for equipment, material and labor, but also the inherent social costs related to any new industrial development of this type. There has been increasing realization, for example, that industrial growth can bring rising social-economic costs in terms of overcrowded housing, schools and highways, as well as noise, air and water pollution. Although these variables are much more difficult to measure than dollar values assigned to the economics of construction and operation, they must be considered in any complete impact evaluation. 8.3.1 INTERNAL COSTS 10 The CRBRP will be an asset to the nation. Even though the direct bene-fits derived from the CRBRP may not, by themselves, be of such value in the short run as to offset the cost of construction and operation, the l development of a viable breeder industry will justify the overall costs and make the development of a new industry possible with great benefits for the future. Internal cost figures for the CRBRP will ultimately reflect the cost of solving the problems of achieving reliable electrical generation with LMFBR technology along with the environmental considerations of assuring clean and safe power generation. I Project cost estimates are presented in Table 8.3-1 which shows a plant j investment of $2,195,000,000. In addition, the $796,600,000 for develop-ment costs and the positive net balance of operating revenue and operating i costs of $106,000,000 bring the total program costs to $2,885,600,000. l 8.3-1 i

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O i) 8.3.2 EXTERNAL COSTS V External costs are of two basic kinds. Those resulting from the activi-ties which occur during the temporary construction phase of the project are typically costs of short-term duration, while those associated with the more or less permanent operations phase are usually costs of long-term duration. These two kinds of external costs are assessed in the following subsections. A more detailed assessment is reported in Appendix C to this document. 8.3.2.1 COSTS OF SHORT-TERM DURATION Direct and indirect employment associated with the CRBRP Project will result in approximately 5,500 employees to fill the positions that are scheduled and estimated for the peak of construction activity in 1985. The employment of many of these employees will have impacts upon the economic and social systems existing within the area. 10 b) V Impacts of primary concern are those associated with the movement of employees into the area. These impacts include changes to the current relationship between the supply and demand for facilities and services provided by private enterprise and local government such as housing and schools . These and other kinds of effects of the CRBRP Project upon the existing social-economic conditions within the area are discussed in subsequent subsections. Not all workers associated with the CRBRP Project will relocate to a new residence within the area. It is estimated that approximately 25 percent of the peak work force requirements for manuals, non-manuals, and subcontractors, and 50 percent for project office, contractor support, and operations personnel (over and above the number of workers already in the area as of February 1981) will be filled by workers who relocate from outside the area to a new residence within the area. This estimate O 8.3-2

Amend. X Dec. 1981 of the rate of inmovers is based on the assumption that normal levels of competition for area labor will exist. The effects of this and a higher estimate are compared in Appendix C to the Environmental Report. Applying these proportions to the employment scheduled for the peak of construction activity results in a total of about 1,300 CRBRP employees who will relocate to a new residence inside the area. To estimate the size of the population influx resulting during the peak employment period, it was projected that 70 percent of the employees moving into the area would bring their families and that, on average, there would be about 3.2 peop!e per family and about .7 school age children per family (Table 8.3-2). These factors are based upon the results of surveys conducted by TVA.2-7 The use of these factors results in the estimation that a total of about 3,200 men, women, and children will relocate to new residences v:ithin the area by the peak of construction activity. Because workers are not expected to be relocating in the area to fill indirect employment jobs resulting from direct perma-nent employment, no new population associated with indirect employment is anticipated. 10 This new population will relocate in specific counties and municipalities of the area as a result of existing social and economic conditions, and individual and group preferences. The principal determinants of place of relocation are proximity to work, the type of housing available, and the costs to purchase or rent housing accommodations. Based upon an analysis of the distance to and direction from the Site, housing availa-bility described in Section 8.1.3.1 and indications of housing choice in 2-7 , the distribution of project population the results of the TVA surveys summarized in Table 8.3-3 was estimated. Table 8.3-3 provides a breakdown of the new project-related population by area and community associated with the direct employment peak. Knox County is expected to receive the largest number of new people (1,450), O 8.3-3

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O followed by Roane County (800), Anderson County (640), and Loudon V County (320). 8.3.2.1.1 HOUSING SITUATION IMPACTS i Table 8.3-4 indicates the estimated place and type of new residences for relocated direct project employees and the totals at the peak of con-struction activity. It is important to note however, that the figures reported in the table reflect in part the estimated availability of housing of different types in different places. Ilowever, while availa-bility operates as a force to attract employees to a particular type and place of residence, other factors can lead employees to demand housing where it is in short supply. The description of the existing housing situation reported in Section 8.1.3.1 provides an indication of the housing situation. The following 10 observations represent the anticipated changes in the housing situation that could occur based on considerations of the availability of housing by type, cost of buying or renting, ability of the housing construction industry to meet housing demands, and the amount of land available for development. Table 8.3-4 indicates that Knox County will experience the greatest demand for housing by the peak construction period with a total of 570 units needed by project-related employees followed by Roane County (320 units), Anderson County (255 units), and Loudon County (125 units). These housing estimates are cumulative totals of all units required to house project-related employees through peak employment. The project- . related demand for housing at the county level is considerably less than f the available housing supply recorded in recent times for each of the l counties within the study area. A closer look at communities within the study area projected to receive inmovers indicates that Kingston, Lenoir City, and Oak Ridge could be faced with a project-related housing 1 O 8.3-4 l t

Amende X Dec. 1981 demand approximately equal to the 1980 available housing supply. Even with a level of housing construction activity between 1980 and the peak year comparable to the scale of activity that occurred in the 1970's, these communities could be faced with tight housing markets during the peak construction period. 8.3.2.1.2 SCHOOL SYSTEM IMPACTS The school enrollments resulting from the schcal-age children of relo-cated CRBRP Project direct employees are summarized in Table 8.3-5. To compute these enrollments, estimates of within county geographic distribution and between grade statistical distribution were required. ! Basically, the rationale for the geographic distribution estimates is a simple extension of that discussed above in the case of relocation within the area. The distribution of enrollments was arbitrarily applied proportionately 10 across the 13 grades. It was assumed that a relatively young age group of employees would likely be recruited to fill positions of employ-ment and that not all children would attend kindergarten. Table 8.3-5 , shows total project-related school enrollments to be 620. Of this total, l. 130 new students are expected to enroll in the school systems within : Anderson County; 160 in Roane County; 240 in the north, northwest, . and southwest sectors of Knox County; 30 in west Knoxville; and 60 l in Loudon County. I t Comparing these estimates with the school system capacity and enrollment numbers presented in Table 8.1-15, the possible impacts of the CRBRP project can be noted. In only one case, that of Knox County, is there a potentially adverse impact. The estimated new enrollments of 240 would j contribute to an existing condition of over enrollment in the west and northwest sectors of the Knox County school system. This impact is not considered significant because the project-related students added to West Knox County schools represent less than 2 percent of the combined school capacity and would be attending these schools for less than 2 years. j 8.3-5

Amend. X Dec. 1981 While the school enrollments resulting from the CRBRP Project contribute b'O to the crowding in some systems and grades, these new students alone do not create unfavorable conditions. A more reflective analysis is reported in Appendix C. 8.3.2.1.3 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS Table 8.3-6 shows the projected increases in traffic volume generated by the day shift on the principal highway segments in the area (see Figure 8.3-1). These volumes are based on the peak construction employment. Since an estimated 80 percent of the construction work force will work day shift, the day shift commuters are anticipated to contribute the major CRBRP related traffic loads to the surrounding highway network. The following assumptions were used as a basis to evaluate the traffic 10 situation :

1. No sponsored van and bus program.

2. Commuter vehicle occupancy = 2.0.

3. No truck deliveries to construction site during the day shift commuting hours.

4. The CRBRP construction work shift hours will be staggared such that the CRBRP commuter traffic will not coincide with the existing (non-CRBRP related) peak hour traffic on the significantly impacted highway segments.

5. Prior to significant construction employment buildup, the following intersections will be upgraded to sufficiently accommodate the projected traffic:

a. State Route 95 and State Route 58.

b. State Route 58 and Bear Creek Road (CRBRP Access Road).

c. State Route 95 and Bear Creek Road (CRBRP Access Road).

6. Annual increase in non-CRBRP related traffic volumes = 2 percent.

8.3-6

Amend. X Dec. 1981 Table 8.3-7 provides a perspective as to the day shift commuter traffic impacts on the five key State highway segments (see Figure 8.3-1) anti- l cipated to be significactly impacted by the CRBRP commuter traffic. The table is based on the " level of service" concept of traffic analysis 8 (see appendix C for definitions of levels of service). Existing traffic volumes are based on traffic count data provided by TDOT.9 From an evaluation of the table, the following general conclusions can be made as to the effect of the CRBRP commuter traffic on these highway segments:

1. The projected traffic volumes do no exceed the calculated capacities (level E) during the hours which the CRBRP traffic contributes to the existing traffic volumes for any of the five highway segments.

2. The service levels during the hour which the commuter traffic contributes will decrease (worsen) by one service level with the exception that the level of service on State Route 58 between the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant and the intersection with State Route 95 will decrease by two levels.

10

3. With the exception of highway segment 3, State Route 58 between the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant and the Intersection of State Route 95, all segments will operate at low levels of service (D or worse) for about two consecutive ho irs during the peak commuting hours. The reason for the two hour duration of congested traffic flow is that the CRBRP related commuter traffic will immediately l precede the existing peak hour traffic, and therefore, extend the duration of time of low levels for service on highway segments in the project area from one to two hours.

l l 8.3.2.1.l FISCAL IMPACTS l This influx of construction workers and dependents will result in increased l l revenues to the general fund and school fund of local governments in the l four-county impact area. Such a temporary population influx also creates the potential for strains on certain local government services and subse- ! quent increases in expenditures for those services. Because of the O l 8.3-7

Amend. X Dec. 1981 relatively small population influx the only service which might require +

l expansion is education. Although no capital expansion should be needed, additional teachers may be required in most of the school systems to meet the demands of the peak population influx. The project revenue i increases are sufficient to accommodate the increased costs of providing the additional teachers expected to be needed. Appendix C contains details of the fiscal analysis. Since no other local government services, j such as law enforcement or fire protection, should need expansion, no increase in local general fund expenditures will be necessary. However, local governments may expand services, if desired, to the extent made i possible by increased revenues. In conclusions, a positive fiscal impact is expected in all local governments in the impact area, despite some . projected increased expenditures for education. l i 8.3.2.1.5 OTHER PROJECT IMPACTS i 10 Other potential project impacts include effects upon area health care, . public safety, water supply and waste disposal systems, recreation, j and aesthetic considerations. The following conclusions regarding j impacts upon these several systems are based upon the analysis ! results reported in Appendix C to this document. 4 i i In the area of health care, all of the medical facilities within the l four-county study area have access bed capacities of 24 percent ; or greater and could accommodate increased patient loads. In terms of public safety, it appears that additions to the current law enforcement staffs should not be necessary to accommodate the j temporary population influx in the counties and municipalities. The j anticipated population influx is not large enough to require expansion j j 8.3-8

  -- ---,- ---.-, -- ~ - -- -.-- -.----..             - , - . . . .      .. , . - .     ,,.-n..,,,, . , - . . - , , . , , - - ,,- - , -   r -

Amend. X Dec. 1981 of services. The moderate size and incremental nature of the popula-tion influx for the four-county area should not cause any adverse impacts on fire protection. Thus, no expansion of services should be necessary. All of the municipalities have large enough excess capacities in their water supply, wastewater disposal, and solid waste disposal systems to accommodate additional residents. All communities designated to receive inmovers will experience additional stresses on existing recreation facilities. No community or county recreation program will be significantly adversely affected. However, noticeable stresses on recreation facilities in Roane County may be experienced due primarily to the existing shortage of adequate facilities. Since the Site is located in a wooded area two miles from SR 58 and the area surrounding the Site is sparsely populated, any temporary aesthetic degradation during construction will be experienced by very few people. There are 1,364 acres within the Site boundaries. This acreage is government-owned land and the area has been restricted from public use. As a result, there is a little change expected in terms of impairment of such things as recreation, land or water use. For example, although the river bank will be marked and posted to prevent private or commercial use of this area, activities on the Clinch River related to river traffic and fishing will not be affected by the CRBRP operations. l l I 8.3.2.2 COSTS OF LONG-TERM DUR ATION Long-term external costs stem from the changes that may occur through-out the lifetime of the project. These costs may range from minor inconveniences to direct loss of revenues. By and large, however, the operation of a nuclear electric generating facility creates few direct or indirect social-economic long-term external costs. O 8.3-9

Amend. X Dec. 1981 (x)

One of the most noticeable long-term effects will be on the local meteoro-

%'J logical conditions since a vapor plume formed by the evaporation of water will be visible above the cooling towers.       This may form fog at ground level on rare occasions and create icy conditions on road systems in subfreezing temperatures.        These environmental effects are discussed in more detail in Section 5.0.

It is not anticipated that the operation of the plant will increase local government costs. The permanent employees (approximately 250 as compared to the construction workforce peak of about 5,400) will be dispersed throughout the area; therefore, no one county or municipality is expected to support the total workforce. As a result, there will be little or no impact on facilities and services required to accommodate this minimal population increase. An assessment of these effects is reported in Appendix C to this document. 10 Because of its remote and isolated location, there will be no significant deterioration of aesthetic or scenic values in the vicinity of the CRBRP. Investigation of the Site has revealed no significant scenic or natural landmarks and the only site of local historical interest is the Hensley Cemetery which will be accessible to members of the family. A rchaeo-logical sites were excavated; any further investigations will be completed by the time construction begins. Therefore, construction and operation of the CRBRP will have no significant adverse effect on historical, scenic, cultural or natural landmarks. 8.3.2.3

SUMMARY

OF EXTERNAL COSTS The forecasted effects of the CRBRP Project discussed in this section include demographic and socioeconomic conditions associated with the construction and operation of the CRBRP, O) 8.3-10

Amendo X Dec. 1981 Direct and indirect employment associated with the project is expected to peak at about 5,500 workers. Those workers who move into Anderson, Roane, Knox, and Loudon Counties are not expected to cause a rapid rise and fall in the total population of that area. This project-related population influx is expected to peak at about 3,210 men, women, and children and level to about 320 people by start of plant operations. Associated with this population pattern will be' 3 rise and fall in demand for private and public facilities and services. Need for housing units is expected to peak at about 1,300 units during the fourth year after the start of site preparation. Of this total need, about SG percent will be for conventional houses, about 30 percent will be for mobile home sites and about 20 percent will be for apartments and rooms. Most of the need for conventional houses is expected to occur in West Knox and ' Oak Ridge; most of that for mobile home sites is expected to occur in the rural parts of Roane, Knox, and Loudon Counties and moit of the ! 10 need for apartments and rooms is expected to occur in West Knox and Oak Ridge. Another need associated with the project-related population is watei" and wastewater distribution, collection, and treatment. Water supply and treatment capacity are generally expected to be adequate to meet the needs of this population. Distribution and collectior. systems, however, may require expansion or improvement in districts- serving rural areas. Use of subsurface wastewater systems is unacceptable in many' parts of these rural areas. Project-related school enrollments for the area are expected to peak at about 620 students during the fourth year after the start of site p repara tion . To meet the needs of these students at the system level, about 15 classrooms and teachers will be required. Most of this need is expected to occur in the Knox County School System. With the exception of Knox County, room capacities anticipated in each of the ochool systems are expected to be sufficient to accommodate the project-related students. G 8.3-11

                                                       ~
                                                       '                                                Amend. X Dec. 1981 Need for health and recreation facilities and services associated with- the project-related populat:o$ is not expected to reach a level which would Jadyarsely affect the existing quality of health and recreation service in the area. Thih general conclusion also applies to the quality of public siliety in the area. Some fire protection problems could arise, however,
                              /df mobile home sites are located in areas not having adequate water
                           / < distribution systems.

I A problem commonly experienced during the construction phase of such

                                                                                                                   'l0 projects is traffic congestion. In the case of the CRBRP, a substantial increase in load can be anticipated on SR58 and 95 in the project area.

State highway segments'in the project area will be congested for about two consecutive hours during peak commuting hours during the peak of I construction . f , -

    'Y
;                                                                      8.3-12
   ,c      - , , , - - -            -
                           ,4,.,c...w,,_

TABLE 8.3-1 CRBRP TOTAL PLANT COST ESTIMATE - BASE COST * (Millions of 1974 Dollars, Escalated at 8% Compounded) 74 75 76 76T 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 39 90 91 92 93 94 Total PLANT IN\TSTMENT hsss RM EQUIPMENT .1 3.3 11.6 4.5 41.8 30.7 22.1 22.0 39.5 51.1 52.7 32.4 14.4 .5 327.2 AE EQUIPMENT (All AE Equipment is included in the B0P Equipment Category) CONSTRUCTION .3 .6 1.6 1.2 1.5 2.2 3.2 18.2 44.0 47.0 65.2 56.9 22.9 4.0 (2.8) 266.0 RM ENGINEERING 4.9 6.4 8.0 2.2 9.6 8.6 13.7 9.3 9.6 8.3 3.8 2.4 2.3 2.0 1.4 1.4 1.4 95.3 AE ENGINEERING (All AE Engineering is included in the BOP Engineering Category) ESCALATION .8 3.3 1.3 15.0 15.5 18.6 20.5 38.9 68.9 103.9 98.6 112.6 93.0 43.2 10.8 (3.4) 641.5 SUBTOTAL 5.0 10.5 23.2 8.6 68.0 56.0 55.9 54.0 91.2 146.5 204.4 180.9 194.5 152.4 67.5 16.2 (4.8) 1,330.0 BOP EQUIPMENT .6 2.0 2.2 .2 4.0 13.7 30.0 9.6 4.3 1.4 .3 .8 69.1 CONSTRUCTION .1 .2 .8 .5 1.1 .9 1.7 9.0 21.8 23.3 32.3 28.2 11.4 2.0 (1.4) 131.9 AE ENGINEERING 7.1 10.1 11.9 4.0 16.0 14.5 16.0 13.1 7.8 3.5 2.1 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.3 1.1 .7 118.3 ESCALATION .8 2.1 .7 5.3 6.7 8.6 11.1 17.4 37.6 34.7 36.1 50.5 48.6 25.6 6.1 (1.6) 290.3 SUB10TAL 7.1 10.9 14.7 4.9 24.1 23.9 25.9 29.1 40.6 80.1 68.2 66.3 87.1 79.7 40.1 9.2 (2.3) 609.6 PLANT COST TOTAL 12.1 21.4 37.9 13.5 92.1 79.9 81.8 83.1 131.8 226.6 272.6 247.2 281.6 232.! 107.6 25.4 (7.1) 1,939.6 oo FUEL FAB (INITIAL) .1 .1 .2 .1 1.2 1.6 2.1 I2.6 12.2 5.9 38.0 I.SCALATION .1 .8 .5 1.1 1.6 2.5 17.4 19.2 10.4 53.6 1.0 5.7 3.3 10.0 10 Nf SPECI AL NUCLEAR MATERI AL 2,b41.2 [] PI ANT INVESTMENT TOTAL 12.1 21.4 38.0 13.6 92.4 80.0 81.8 85.1 133.0 228.9 275.8 252.8 317.3 266.8 123.9 25.4 (7.1) LEVELOPHENT

    'kM'ENUl5EERING        13.0 26.5 32.1       8.8    37.3 29.9 28.4 30.4 27.4 14.9           9.0    5.5    3.7   2.6  1.9   1.8    1.8                                     275.0 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT           .4 15.1 20.5     7.7 29.5 28.6 30.7 31.0 11.8           3.0    1.3      .5                                                             180.1 PROJECT OFFICE         4.4    3.5    5.1   1.5    4.9  3.6      3.2    3.9  4.0    4.9   5.2    5.0   4.6    4.6  4.0  3.8                                                66.2 ESCALATION                    3.6    9.6  3.3 20.3 24.1 31.0 40.2 32.3 20.2 16.0 13.3 11.3 11.2 10.5 11.3                      4.0                                     262.2 DIXELOPKENT TOTAL         17.8   48.7 67.3 21.3 92.0 86.2 93.3 105.5 75.5 43.0 31.5 24.3 19.6 18.4 16.4 16.9                       5.8                                      783.5 Ol'E RATING
   ~~PRdlECT OFFICE                                                                                                                  2.9  2.0   1.4      .8     .5    .3         7.9 GPER. & HAINTENANCE                                                                        .3   2.1    4.1   4.4  5.3  6.8    11.8 11.8 11.2     11.4   11.2  6.0         86.4 FUEL FAB (RELOAD)                                                                                 .6     .6  5.8  6.6 11.9 12.4     7.8   6.6                             52.3 ESCALATION                                                                                 .3    3.2   6.5  16.0 21.2 37.2 60.5 53.6 53.2        37.6  39.7 23.5        352.5 SUBTOTAL                                                                                   .6   5.9  11.2 26.2 33.1 55.9 87.6 75.2 72.4          49.8  51.4 29.8        499.1 REVENUE                                                                                                                     (13.0)(19.2)(26.0) (35.5) (36.3)(21.2) (151.2)

ESCALATION (29.1)(47.8)(71.9)(108.0)(123.2)(79.3) (460.0) OtERATING TOTAL .6 5.9 11.2 26.2 33.1 55.9 45.5 8.2 (25.5) (94.5)(108.0)(70.7) (112.1) ESCALATION TOTAL 5.2 15.0 5.3 40.7 46.3 58.2 72.6 89.1 127.8 156.5 153.7 198.3 188.0 110.9 65.4 30.4 5.8 (18.7) (71.2) (83.4)(55.8)1.140.1 PP0 JECT TOTAL 29.9 70.1 105.3 34.9 184.4 166.2 175.1 190.6 208.5 271.9 307.9 283.0 348.1 311.4 173.4 98.2 44.2 8.2 (25.5) (94.5)(108.0)(70.7)2,712.6 ESCALATION FACTORS 1.000 1.080 1.166 1.188 1.283 1.386 1.497 . 616 1.746 1.885 2.036 2.199 2.375 2.565 2.770 2.992 3.231 3.489 3.769 4.070 4.396 4.742

   *As of March, 1980.                                                                                                                                                     3 r) n)
                                                                                                                                                                         * :3
                                                                                                                                                                         >4  .CL OD 03 ><

we O O O

I l 9 9 9 k.

!                                                                               TABLE 8.3-1 (Continued) i CRBRP TOTAL PIANT COST ESTIMATE - CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE (Millions of 1974 Dollars Escalated at 87, Compounded) l 74     75    76   76T 77        78     79     80   81     82            83    84            85      86  87  88  89     90    91  92             93    94   Total l

PLANT INVESTMENT ! NhaS RM EQUIPMENT 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.0 .5 5.7 AE EQUIPMErfT (All AE Equipment is incl.uded in the BOP Equipment Category) ? CONSTRUCTION 2.3 5.5 5.9 8.2 7.1 2.9 .5 32.4 RM ENGINEERING .4 .5 .2 .I .1 .1 .1 .1 1.6 AE ENGINEERING (All AE Engineering is included in the h0P Engineering Category) > ESCALATION 1.2 3.6 7.5 8.4 12.0 11.4 5.2 1.0 .2 50.5 j SUBTOTAL 2.8 7.9 14.7 15.4 20.8 18.6 8.2 1.6 .2 90.2 , ! BOP I EQUIPMENT .4 .9 .4 .1 1.8 ! CONSTRUCTION 1.2 2.8 2.9 4.1 3.5 1.4 .3 16.2 i AE ENGINEERING 3.1 .3 ,2 1.0 .2 .2 .2 .1 5.3

  ."   ESCAIATION                                                           1.9   .6    2.1           3.4   5.0         5.7       5.8 2.7  .7  .1                                           28.0 LJ   SL'BTOTAL                                                            5.0  1.3    4.4           6.6   9.0       10.0        9.5 4.3 1.0  .2                                           51.3 h

A PLANT COST TOTAL 5.0 4.1 12.3 21.3 24.4 30.8 28.1 12.5 2.6 .4 141.5 l FUEL FAB (INITIAL) .1 .1 .3 1.8 .8 4.9 y i ESCALATION .1 .2 .3 2.5 2.8 1.5 7.4 SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL l PIANT INVESTMENT TOTAL 5.0 4.1 12.5 21.6 25.0 35.1 32.7 14.8 2.6 .4 153.8 DEVELOPt.ENT RM ENGINEERING 1.4 .7 .5 .3 .2 .1 .1 .1 .1 3.5 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT .2 .I .3 PROJECT OFFICE .2 .6 .2 .3 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.3 ESCALATION 1.4 1.2 .8 .6 .6 1.0 .6 .6 .2 7.0 DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 3.2 2.6 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.5 .9 .9 .3 13.1 OPERATING , PROJECT OFFICE .2 .1 .1 .1 .5 l OPER. & MAINTENANCE 5 FUEL FAB (RELOAD) .2 .3 .4 .3 .2 1.4 l ESCALATION .1 .2 .4 .6 1.1 1.0 .5 .1 .1 .1 4.2 SUBTOTAL .1 .2 .6 .9 1.7 1.4 .8 .2 .1 .1 6.1 REVENLT. ESCAIATION OPERATIEG TOTAL .1 .2 .6 .9 1.7 1.4 .8 .2 .1 .1 6.1 ESCALAT!ch TOTAL 1.9 3.2 7.0 11.9 14.3 20.9 21.2 10.4 2.9 1.6 1.0 .5 .1 .1 .1 97.1 PROJECT TOU L 5.0 7.3 15.1 *3.1 26.2 36.2 34.4 16.3 4.4 2.4 1.4 .8 .2 .1 .1 173.0 ESCALATION FACTORS 1.000 1.080 1.166 1.188 1.283 1.386 1.497 1.616 1.746 1.885 2.036 2.199 2.375 2.565 2.770 2.992 3.231 3.489 3.769 4.070 4.396 4.742 l N n.

3 Q.

                                                                                                                                                                                          >.a.

C CO >< v.*

TABLE 8.3-1 (Cont inued) l CRERP TOTAL PLANT COST ESTIMATES - BASE COST PLUS CONTINJENCY [ (Mallions of 1974 Dollars, Escalated at 81 Compounded) l 1 l 74 75 76 76T 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 Total I PLAyT INyEJTMEN] Nsss kM EQUIPMENT .1 3.3 11.6 4.5 41.8 30.7 22.1 22.0 40.7 52.6 54.2 33.9 14.9 .5 332.9 AE EQUIPMEMT (All AE Equipment is included in the BOP Equipment Category) CONSTRt'CTION .3 .b 1.6 1.2 1.5 2.2 3.2 20.5 49.5 52.9 73.4 64.0 25.8 4.5 (2.8) 298.4 RM ENGINEERING 4.9 b.4 8.0 2.2 9.b 8.6 13.7 9.3 10.0 8.8 4.0 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.5 1.5 1.4 96.9 AE ENGINEERING (All AE Engineering is included in the BOP Engineering Category) ESCA LATION .8 3.3 1.3 15.0 15.5 18.6 20.5 40.1 72.5 111.4 107.0 124.6 104.4 48.4 11.8 (3.2) 692.0 SLBTUTAL 5.0 10.5 23.2 8.6 68.0 56.0 55.9 54.0 94.0 154.4 219.1 196.3 215.3 !?l.0 15.7 17.8 (4.6) 1,420.2 BOP EQU ll' MENT .6 2.0 2.2 .2 4.0 14.1 30.9 10.0 4.4 1.4 .3 .8 70.9 CONSTRUCTION .1 2 .8 .5 1.1 .9 1.7 10,2 24.6 26.2 36.4 31.7 12.8 2.3 (1.4) 148.1 AE ENGINEERING 1.1 10.1 11.9 4.0 16.0 14.5 16.0 16.2 8.1 3.7 2.1 3.6 3.1 2.8 2.5 1.1 .8 123.6 h ESCA LA T T ON .8 2.1 .7 5.3 6.7 8.6 13.0 18.0 39.7 18.1 41.1 56.2 54.4 28.3 6.8 (1.5) 318.3 ja SOUTOTAL 7.1 10.9 14.7 4.9 24.1 23.9 25.9 34.1 41.9 84.5 74.8 75.3 97.1 89.2 44.4 10.2 (2.1) 660.9 12.1 10

p. PLANT COST TOTAL 21.4 37.9 13.5 92.1 79.9 81.8 88.1 135.9 238.9 293.9 271.6 312.4 260.2 120.1 28.0 (6.7) 2,081.1 La FUEL FAB (INITIAL) .I .1 .2 .1 1.2 .7 1.3 1.7 2.4 14.4 14.0 6.7 42.9 ESC A LATION .1 .8 .5 1.2 1.8 2.8 19.9 22.0 11.9 61.0 SPECI AL hUCLEAR MATERI AL 1.0 5.7 3.3 10.0 PLANT INVESTMENT TOTAL 12.1 21.4 38.0 13.6 92.4 80.0 81.8 90.1 137.1 241.4 297.4 277.8 352.4 299.5 138.7 28.0 (6.7) 2,195.0 13.VE!OPMENT RM ENGINEERING 11.0 26.5 32.1 8.8 37.3 29.9 28.4 30.4 28.8 15.6 9.5 5.8 3.9 2.7 2.0 1.9 1.9 278.5 kESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT .4 15.1 20.5 7.7 29.5 28.6 30.7 31.0 12.0 3.1 1.3 .5 180.4 PROJECT OFFICE 4.4 3.5 5.1 1.5 4.9 3.6 1.2 3.9 4.2 5.5 5.4 5.3 4.8 5.0 4.2 4.0 68.5 ESCA!ATION 3.6 9.6 3.3 20.3 24.1 31.0 40.2 33.7 21.4 16.8 13.9 11.9 12.2 11.1 11.9 4.2 269.2 DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 17.8 48.7 67.3 21.3 92.0 86.2 93.3 105.5 78.7 45.6 33.0 25.5 20.6 19.9 17.3 17.8 h.] 796.6 {

OPERATING PNu)ECT OfflCE 3.1 2.1 1.5 .9 .5 .3 8.4 j OPER. & MAINTENANCE .3 2.1 4.1 4.4 5.3 6.8 11.8 11.8 11.2 11.4 11.2 6.0 86.4 . II;EL FAB (RE!.OAD) .6 .6 5.8 6.8 12.2 12.8 8.1 6.8 53.7 F SC A LAT!UN .3 3.2 6.6 16.2 21.6 37.8 61.6 54.6 53.7 37.7 39.8 23.6 356.7 , Sl'BTOTAL .6 5.9 11.3 26.4 33.7 56.8 89.3 76.6 73.2 50.0 51.5 29.9 505.2 kEVENUE (13.0)(19.2)(26.0) (35.5) (36.3)(21.2) (151.2) , ESCAIATION (29.1)(47.8)(71.9)(108.8)(123.1)(79.3) (460.0),l i OPERATING TOTAL .6 5.9 11.3 26.4 33.7 56.8 47.2 9.6 (24.7) (94.3)(107.9)(10.6) (106.0) ESCALATION TOTAL 5.2 15.0 5.3 40.7 46.3 58.2 74.5 92.3 134.8 168.4 168.0 219.2 209.2 121.3 68.3 32.0 6.8 (18.2) (71.1) (83.3)(55.7)1,237.2 ' PROJECT TOTAL 29.9 70.1 105.3 34.9 184.4 16o.2 175.1 195.6 215.8 287.0 331.0 309.2 384.3 345.8 189.7 102.6 46.6 9.6 (24.7) (94.3)(107.9)(70.6)2,885.6 l ESCALATION FACTORS 1.000 1.080 1. le.6 1.188 1.283 1.380 1.497 1.616 1.746 1.885 2.036 2.199 2.375 2.565 2.770 2.992 3.231 3.489 3.769 4.070 4.396 4.742

                                                                                                                                                                        ,     ,,1 a     25

p. .[L 00 ><

e.-* O O O

Amend. X TABLE 8.3-2 CRBRP ESTIMATED POPULATION EFFECTS PEAK YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION Migration Condition A Projected Employment 5,400 Population Effects Number of movers 1,270 10 Movers with families (70%) 890 Movers without families (30%) 380 l School age children

620 Total population influx ** 3,210
Assuming .7 school age children per family.

         ** Assuming 3.2 people per family.

O 8.3-16

hiend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 8.3-3 ESTIMATED NUMBER AND LOCATION CF RELOCATED i CRBRP PROJECT EMPLOYEES, SPOUSES, AND CllILDREN AT PEAK OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Migration Condition A Percent of Population Movers Total School Age Anderson County Oak Ridge 15 480 100 Clinton Area 5 160 30 10 Knox County Knoxville 5 160 30 West Knox County 40 1,290 240 London County I Lenoir City Area 10 320 60 i Roane County Kingston Area 15 480 100 l Rockwood Area 5 160 30 t ; 30 liarriman Area 5 160 , 100 3,210 620 ; I O 8.3-17 1

Amend. X Dec. 1981

 .v)                                                                                 TABLE 8.3-4 NEW RESIDENCES:                  ESTIMATED PLACE AND TYPE OF RESIDENCE OF RELOCATED CRBRP PROJECT EMPLOYEES AT PEAK OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Migration Condition A Conventional           Mobile Home   Apartments             Total Place                                     Houses               Sites     and Rooms    Residences Anderson County

24 27 14 65 City of Oak Ridge 112 0 78 190 570 10 Knox County 294 127 149 Loudon County 65 51 9 125 Roane County 118 157 45 320 T otal 613 362 295 1270 '

O

        *0utside of Oak Ridge l

O 8.3-18 i

TABLE 8.3-5 NEW STUDENTS: TOTAL OF ESTIMATED NUMBER OF SCIIOOL ENROLLMENTS FOR CIIILDREN OF RELOCATED CHBRP EMPLOYEES AT PEAK OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY Scil 00L SYSTEM AND GRADE LEVEL Migration Condition A School System i K_inpygarten Grarles 1-6 Grades 7-12 Total co Anderson 8 6 h e 1 15 Clinton 2 13 0 15 10 Oak Ridge 5 43 52 100 Roane 7 65 58 130 lia rrima n 2 13 15 30 Knox

16 108 116 240 Knoxville 2 13 15 30 Loudon 4 20 16 40 SN Lenoir City 1 7 12 20 P@

Area 40 290 290 020

                                                                                                                            .E. x
           *0nly the north, northwest, and southwest sectors of the Knox School System O                                                                         O                                    O

Amend. X Dec. 1981 [ TABLE 8.3-6 CRBRP SITE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Increase in Commuter Vehicles Total (approximately 2 persons / car) 2,500 Day shift (80% of total) 2,000 Day shift use of highway sections Bear Creek Road from site to State Route 58 900 Bear Creek Road from site to State Route 95 1,100 State Route 58 from Bear Creek Road to State Route 95 400 State Route 58 from Bear Creek Road to I-40 500 State Route 58 South of I-40 200 10 State Route 95 North of State Route 58 400 State Route 95 from Bear Creek Road to Bethel Valley Road 1,000 State Route 95 from Bethel Valley Road to I-40 800 State Route 95 South of I-40 200 I-40 East of State Route 95 600 I-40 West of State Route 58 300 (O) Bear Creek Road East of State Route 95 100 200 Bethel Valley Road East of State Route 95 Based on a workforce size of 5,030 project-related employees reporting to I work onsite and 370 project-related employees reporting to work at offsite !

locations during the peak year of plant construction. j i O 8.3-20 l

i TABLE 8.3-7 l { CRBRP COMMUTER TRAFFIC IMPACTS ON KEY IIIGilWAY SEGMENTS Migration Condition A ! Projected Level of Existing Level of Service for llour l Existing Service for IIour Which CRBRP j Peak IIour Which CRBRP Commuter Coramuter Traf fic ; liighway Segment Level of Service Traffic Contributes Contributes

1. State Route 58 between I-40 and D C D P Bear Creek Road (CRBRP Access Road) i Y Z 2. State Route ab Between Bear Creek D B D 10 Road (CRBRP Access Road) and ORGDP

3. State Route 58 Between ORGDP and D B C Intersection State Route 95

4. State Route 95 from Intersection E C D State Route 58 to Beginning of 4-Lane in Oak Ridge

5. State Route 95 Between I-40 and E D E Bear Creek Road (CRBRP Access Road)

Ed Pg

~.'

W G . G G

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O N r0 stainnina 0, ta=E I NNW NE 95 4 NW NE 9 3 58 WNW , f, S a

                                                                                                                                                                                                                 +g          ENE 5
                                                                                                                     ~
,        W   -

cuNCH MVER

                                                                                                                       \,                                                                           _

E 95 l e PROPOSED CRBRP 10 58 I WSW 4, ESE 40 i SW SE l l SSW i SSE S 0-Mwv SEGMENT CODEO tm TasLE S-3-7 SCALEl 0 B MILE l l l Figure 8.3-1 PRIllCIPAL HIGHWAY f1ETWORK SURROUf1DIf1G CRBRP SITE. 8.3-22 i

A!!ENDf1ENT VII August 1976 m As with any project of this magnitude, numerous contacts have been made with local and state officials and agencies. In keeping with current policy and practice, close coordination and cooperation with these officials and agencies will be maintained to insure that the project is implemented in accordance with applicable regulations and recommended practices. o 7

O 12.0-2

D3D3L < (2C. - 3 D) 430- - t(f* e40-e 9 i I! O il

l .

f y oc 4 i ) 0 sl g f 0 eu3 lo p un o 8 h g1 r4 . Pi r t e c - t - o t no 19 RR ui o3 C* n o n F dl o - ,e , d* idC oi C0 e3 m it e04, n r c ' h2 e' ag32 na8 P a n2 o s f f io1 t 3l p-

                                                                                                                                        ? m              e icde 2        .

it me , 1 n on f rR c o t r foii - iOF e ct s io ce l c CD use gi l t a r- s er r yr t nt p zR a' po0 , tS u a a iva r F f s lu isz0 ni5 P h ;C Sf 46 3 nrc t g el r C c s rs ,3 oeu) e 3 e oel5 C vr9 e ]i R iciR tF b' A s P 3 r

                                                                                                                                                ;9           '_                    f t a8 fRS9 it7 L UC n e a_
                                                                                                                                             .d e        m                          sSiirR            o          1 e       eF            ef icdn1 0                                                                                  s r c 3 -                                                                eo 9,
                                                                  -us* it                                                                  r -                                     inlaa5t          las t                                                                                     a e r s a ,

6 s a al l

                                                                                                                                               'c         ,1                       leosM4             v sn2 oeo S

ens ma e oii n. i_ e

                                                                                           ,                                        ,   i,d r n M                     id slple e         rniy pnt a N                             C tt                     C' i !
                                                                                                                                                          , r                        uiis GDF(

peaM ATl ( O I T A t , y C c4 . s it , I ,1 A 3 0, C rd 4 1 r, 23 F 50 ,

                                                                               ,. 3 3                                                                                              S                  oe I                             ^ 2
                                                                                                                                            ,. 4                                   U                 hd n                                                          t n T                             1                       i C                                    3                  ue O

n t S C l i 'g l ! r 3 3 A m a N o A cU .

                                                                                                                                                                                      ,               y i                         7

[ ' 3 t es c3 m l a D t y4

r.

t A A N l a g r , AC ] r la ,1-

                                                                                       -                                                                                            r                V3 y A             s                  ed                                        3                                       e, e                    31 ig                E o n                      9 e

5 cf t e93 S e s

                                                                                                                                  ,i I a                 e1 8 L                  c ,                        , :
                                                                                                                                , R W                  s A

L i m n a i

f. n sf C eoS V u . tt , ,1, i1 e U 1

O t ; A a T,<'

                                                                                        -                                i
                                                                                                                                            .ts                                    le4  3 nt ec6                           )

R I ,,1 A C1 T A1 d O-0 P e

       . P                                                                                                                                                                                                                           u 2     A                                                                                                               7                      i ,

s p - n 1 1 .il l r .i rf dliag da o ox - i t

                                                                                                                           ; - t                                                  C                          aaa                     n E     S                                                               i crf          i rde                                             omv L    T f

e f 1 nt e

                                                                                                                                                             ',d           r y

e d n r wl e o C s B I , . i s r d r adsoe A M n , .l

s. ea A nsl (

o - - a ei f eaee cb r, T R i i

                                                                                                                                         -r    /. tsi     t                         n E                             t                                                                                   c c                   igo              o k

asc( u

                                        -                                                                                                r.            al we                                        t eA              o P            e                  t                        ,

wid g t st s e

                                                               *+                                                        ; s) , aca                                                n               inru;l aal r t                      .

n

            ,         o                t,                                                                                                                                           e                    t sl o p                                                                                                                                +f            rh a S            r                                                   i r              f ceic u                                                                                                                                                  ct                         ouif E          P                    u                                                                              -

M va e, r s r u rt e _ S t t oie c nti d n) r ,'t n rf dt ai' _ N i ; i 3 - b t ;m a d n itosli ecre5 ol 0 E f; f ,

                                                                                                                                              / r                   nd             a                 cgal r7 C                                                                                                                ; t urfio I

t i P t ui (tae ge , emte, a ll wt ra ah n i

                                                                                                                                ,:st+                                         i    ei L                             - <
                                        - :                     -                                                                          . . w ia cdf      r                           m          ts cgh ersio c                                                                                             s        i. r               ns rdmt D

er C " 7 , oi tfo c F lprc e r re P P oian ua E Cdb amv R _ I _ U r Q t ,i y E ' A c R - n f , n =

o t og t

r y ! a , ira

r l s n c ! '

1, i r o y t ! A a r4 1 t Eit le l

                                                                                  '.,i, 's                                                                                         s c y                  a,                   "s 'i                                vC ee              la c                                                            '

t t V e cn ao n R ,q t t r ey e , ' s i SP et g r i s s i l si A i s s - c L < g dl s r ei 1 (1 L , ea eo l m 1 i v l t E t t nh c r . rl i n nt uo s r . c , f, i, e e u N C 7 Pf 5P ; um TA N O I T O la C a U - : _ R D _ T S N A t 3 ** [_ T_ N O L F b 3' A_

i. r C

                                                                                                             )
                                                                                                    ][.2,d           -
         '    il':
                   ,        ,iI   ,h                    !ljjj

I TABLE 12.0-1 (Continued) I Agency Purpose of Approval Legislation Regulations WATER (Continued) State Tennessee Department of Water Quality Certification Clean Water Act. 33 USC General Water Quality Criteria Public Health Division for Army Corps and TV4 Permits 1341; Tennessee Water for the Definition and Control { of Water Quality Control Quality Control Act, of Pollution in the Waters of > Tennessee Code Annotated, Tennessee, Rules of the Tennessee ] Section 70-324 g m . Department of Public Health, 4 Chapters 1200-4-3 and 1200-4-4 CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION N LJ_ND, Federal United States Environ- Notification and manifests for Resource Conservation Hazardous Waste Management Systee, mental Protection Agency ** generation or transportation and Recovery Act of 40 CFR 260-265; Consolidated Per-of hazardous wastes; permits 1976, 42 USC 6921-6931 mit Regulations, 40 CFR 122-124 for storage, treatment or dis- g r$

posal of hazardous wastes S. United States Environ- Compliance with EPA Guidelines Solid Waste Disposal Act Guidelines for the Disposal of mental Protection Agency for Disposal of Solid Waste of 1965 as amended by Solid Waste, 40 CRF 241 (1980)

Resource Recovery Act of 1970, 42 USC 3254(c), 42 USC 3254(e) State Tennessee Department of Permit to operate a solid Tennessee Solid Waste Regulations Governing Solid Waste Public Health, Division waste disposal or processing Disposal Act of 1969, as Processing and Disposal Systees in of Solid Waste Management operation amended, Tennessee Code Tennessee, Rules of the Tennessee Annotated, Section 53--4301, Department of Pubile Health, et. m . Chapter 1200-1-7 Tennessee Department of Notification and manifests for Tennessee Hazardous Emergency Rules Governing Hazardous Public Health, Division of generation or transportation Wastes Management Act Waste Management in Tennessee, Solid Weste Management of hazardous wastes; permits of 1977. Tennessee code Rules of the Tennessee Department for storage, treatment or 53-6301 of Pubile Health, Chapter 1200-1-11 disposal of hazardous wastes bk

*2.

co.-. e-* >< (Continued)

TABil 12.0-1 (Continued) Agncy__ Purpoje of App rov a l legisistion Regulations CON 5?RUCTICN AND GPERATION (Continued) ALR federal Federal Aviation Notice must be filed 30 dap federal Aviation Act of Objects Affecting Nsvigable Air Administration prior to construction of any 1958, as amended, 49 USC Space, 14 CFR 77 structure 2C0 feet or more 1301 et M . above ground (i.e. meteoroto-gical tower) National Telecommunica- frequency Autharization for Communications Act of 1934, f requency Allocations and Radio tions and Information J.S. Government station as amended, 47 USC 305 Administration Treaty Matters, General Rules and Regulations, 47 CFR 2; Enecutive Order 12046, March 27, 1978 National Telecommunica- ticense for installing radio Communications Act of 1934 _. tions and Information Construction, Marking and Light-transmitters and .nssociated as amended, 47 USC 303 ing of Antenna Structures, to Administration tewers 47 CFR 17 O g e State Tenne nce Department of Permits to construct and oper-01 Public Health, Bureau of Tennessee Air Quality Act; Construction and Operating Permits ate new air contamination Tennessee Code Annotated. Tennessee Air Pollution Control Environmental Health source (f uel burning equipment , section 53-3408 et sej. Services, Division of Air Regul.stions, Chapters 1200-3-9 .01 on site concrete batch plant, and 1200- 3-9 . 02 Pollution Control fuel storage tanks and cooling tower) WATER Federal United States Coast Authoritation of private aids Guard laws and Regulations Private Aids to Navigation, to navigation for structures i .i Go.erning lands. 43 USC 33 CFR 66 or over nav6 gable =sters of the 1333; Aids to Navigation, Untted States (i.e., barge 14 USC Si facility) United States Coast Nat ification of discharge of Clean Water Act, 53 USC 1321 Control of Pollution by Oil and Juard oil or hatsrdous substamos Hazardous Substances, Discharge Removal, 33 CFR 153 United States inviron- Permit to discharge under Na Clean Water Act, 33 USC mental Protection Agency" NPDES Consolidated Permit Regu-tional Pollstant Vischarge 1342 llimination System (NPDES), including review of cooling lations, 40 CFR 122 125. 45 Fed Reg 33290. 5/19/80,E f fluent l 110 N no water intak" Gaide lines and Standards for *1 Steam Electric Power Generating. -- 40 CFR 42.l* o%g (Continued) e G G

O 11. WASH-1535, Vol I, Section 1.1.1.

12. WASH-1535, Vol I, Section 2.2.1.7.

1.3 REFERENCES

1. WASH-1535, Vol I, Section 2.2.

2. WASH-1509, page 28.

3. WASH-1535, Vol II, Section 4.2, Appendix IVB.2; also see Refer-ence 1.1-3.

4. ERDA-1, page 47.

5. WASH-1535, Vol I, Section 3.2 and Section 3.5.4; and Vol IV, Appen-dix IV.B of Section 11.

6. WASH-1535, Vol I, Ser. tion 3.5.2.

7. LMFBR Demonstration Plant Program - Proceedings of Senior Utility _

Steering Committee and Senior Utility Technical Advisory Panel for O the period April 1971 thru January 1972, WASH-1201, March 1972.

8. WASH-1535,'Vol I, Section 2.

9. WASH-1535, Vol I, Section 3.3.2.

10. WASH-1535, Vol I, Sections 3.5.2 and 3.5.3.

11. Proposed Changes in Basis for Cooperative Arrangement for the LMFBR, Hearings before the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Congress of the United States, 93rd Congress, February 28 - May 4,1973.

1.4 REFERENCES

1. WASH-1535, Vol VI, Section 11.2.4.2.5.

2. Annual Hearings on U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Programs, Hearings before Senate Committee on Appropriations, FY 1967 through FY 1971, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.

3. Annual Hearings on U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Programs, Hearings before House Committee on Appropriations, FY 1967 through FY 1971, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.

13.0-3 3

Amend. X Dec. 1981

4. David, E. E., Science Advisor to the President, remarks before Annual Convention of the Edison Electric Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, 9 June 1971.

5. Ayers, T. G. , President Commonwealth Edison Co. , Intensified R&D --

A Time for Decision, remarks before Annual Convention of the Edison Electric Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, 7 June 1971.

6. Statement of Honorable Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior, before the Senate Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, Hearings on flational Energy Policy, 15 June 1971.

7. Statement of L. A. DuBridge, Science Advisor to the President, before Joint Comittee on Atomic Energy, Hearings on Environnental Effects of Producing Electric Power, Part 1, 28 October 1969.

8. Edison Electric Institute, Report of the EEI Reactor Assessment Panel, EEI Publication No. 70-30, New York,1970.

9. Edison Electric Institute, Fast Breeder Reactor Report, EEI Publi-cation ilo. 68-28, New York, April 1968.

10. American Publh "ower Association, Statement of National Power Policy, APPA, Wa;nington, 9. C., 29 April 1970.

11. WASH-1535, Vol IV, Sectics 11.2.4.2.3.

12. WASH-1535, Vol IV, Section 11.1.3.1.

13. U.S. Energy Outlook in a Report of the flational Petroleum Councils Comittee on U.S. Energy Outlook, December 1972.

10 O 13.0-4

Amend. X Dec. 1981 A Q

2.2 REFERENCES

1. Regional Land Use Plan 2000, Executive Summary. East Tennessee Development District, P.O. Box 19806, Knoxville, Tennessee, September 1978. ,

1 1

2. Personal communication, Ms. Linda Wagner, Transportation Planner, !

Tennessee Department of Transportation to W. T. White, Dames

                & Moore, May 4,1981.

3. Personal communication, Mr. Leonard Soffer, Nuclear Regulatory i Commission to R. C. Baker, TVA, May 1,1981.

10

4. Listing of Hospitals in Tennessee, American Hospital Association Guide to the Health Care Field,1979.

5. Telecon, Mrs. Louise Dunlap, Oak Ridge Chamber of Commerce, to P. Scharre, TVA, July 1981.

6. Tennessee Department of Transportation, Bureau of Planning and Programming, Office of Research and Planning,1980 Average Daily Traffic , 1980.

7. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Atlanta Sectional Aeronautical Chart, April 1981.

(oQ

8. Thornburg, W. D. Principles of Geomorphology, John Wylie and Sons, New York,1960.

        . 3 REFERENCES

1. National Registry of Natural Landmarks, cumulative revision in the Federal Register, Vol 37, No. 20, Washington, D. C. , 29 January 1972.

2. Federal Register, Vol 33, No. 56, Washington, D. C. , 21 March 1968, p 4837.

3. Schroedl, G. F., Archaeological Reconnaissance and Test Excavations in the Clinch River Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant Site

! Area, Report subni tted to TVA, December 1972.

4. Thomas, P. .". , Jr. , A Map of Two Historical Sites in the Clinch River Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant Area, 26 March 1973.

O 13.0-5

5. Letter, Harper, H. L. , Director of Field Services, Tennessee O

Historical Commission to Roark, R. , Division of Reservoir Proper-ties, TVA, 5 June 1973.

6. University of Tennessee, Site Survey Records for Roane County, Tennessee, on file, McClung Museum, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, no date.

7. Schroedl, G. F. , Test Excavations at 40RE124 in the Clinch River Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant Area, Report submitted to TVA, 26 March 1973.

8. Thomas, C., Report on the Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology, Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, D. C., 1894.

9. McNutt, C. H. and Fischer, F. W. , Archaeological Investigations in the Upper Melton Hill Reservoir; Anderson County, Tennessee,1960, Report submitted to the National Park Service, Knoxville, Tennessee, 1960.

10. McNutt, C. H. and Graham, J. B., Archaeological Investigations in the Lower Melton Hill Reservoir; Anderson, Knox, Loudon and Roane Counties, Tennessee,1961, Report submitted to the National Park Service, Knoxville, Tennessee,1961.

11. Schroedl, G. F., Salvage Archaeology in the Clinch River Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant Area, Report submitted to TVA and PMC.

12. Schroedl, G. F. , Salvage Archaeology in the Clinch River Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant Area, Progress report submitted to TVA and PMC, October 1973.

13. Schroedl, G. F., Salvage Archaeology in the Clinch River Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant Area, Progress report submitted to TVA and PMC, November 1973.

14. Schroedl, G. F., Salvage Archaeology in the Clinch River Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant Area, Progress report submitted to TVA and PMC, December 1973.

15. Schroedl, G. F., Salvage Archaeology in the Clinch River Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant Area, Progress report submitted to TVA and PMC, January 1974.

O 13.0-6

Amend. X O 2. Pathfinder Decommissioning Plan, Amendment No. 50 to Provisional Dec. 1981 Operating License DPR-11 (Docket No. 50-130-7 and.50-130-8), February 1971.

3. Boiling Nuclear Superheater Power Station Decomissioning Final Report, WRA-B-70-500, September 1970.

4. Retirement of the Piqua Nuclear Facility, AI-AEC-12832, April 1970.

5. Report on Retirement of Hallam Nuclear Power Facility, AI-AEC-12709, May 1970.

6. Elk River Reactor Dismantling Plan, Operating Authorization DPRA-3 (SS-836), August 27, 1971, Revised October 18, 1971.

7. SEFOR Decommissioning Plan, Docket 50-231, License No. DR-15, March 10, 1972. State of Arkansas Byproduct License, ARK-396 BP-9-74.

8. Fermi I Request for Possession Only License, August 14, 1973, Docket No. 50-16, License No. DPR-9. Possession license issued September 5,1973.

9. A Preliminary Report on Light Water Reactor Decomissioning Costs, O GU-5295.

6.1 REFERENCES

1. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1980 Census of Population and Housing, Tennessee. Preliminary Population and Housing Unit Counts, PHC80-P-44.

U.S. Department of Commerce, January 1981.

2. Telecon, Maranuchi, J. , U.S. Bureau of the Census to White, W. , Dames and Moore, March 24, 1981.

3. Greenberg, Michael R. , Donald A. Krueckeberg, and Richard Mautner.

Long Range Population Projections for Minor Civil Divisions: Computer Programs and User's Manual, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Center for 10 Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University,1973. 3 4. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Reports, Series P-25, No. 704. Projections of the Population of the United States: 1977 to 2050, Washington , D.C. . U.S. Government Printing Office,1977.

5. . Current Population Reports, Series P-25, Projections of State Populations by Age, Race, and Sex: 1975 to 2000, l Washington , D.C. . U.S. Government Printing Office,1979.

6. State of Tennessee. Tennessee State Planning Office, Population i

Projections for Tennessee, Counties, and Civil Divisions, Nashville, i Tennessee , 1977. 13.0-35 (Next page is 13.0-38a) l _ . - - _--- _ __ -- __ _ __ U

AMEND. IX OCT. 1981

6.2 REFERENCES

1. Harvey, J.H. , (ed. ), F.ASL -lic. HASL Procedures Manual, Revised August 1974.

2. Federal hter Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-500, Section 402.

3. Tennessee Water Quality Control Board, General Water Quality Criteria for the Definition ano vontrol of Pollution in the Waters of Tennessee, adopted on 26 May 1967, amended 1967, 1970 and 1971.

4. Peters, L. N., Grigal, D. F., Curlin, J. W. and Selvidge, W. J.,

Walker Branch Watershed Project: Chemical Physical and Morphologi-cal Properties of the Soils of Walker Branch Watershed, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL-TM-2968, 1971.

5. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soi_1_

Survey Manual, 1962. (Also called Agriculture Handbook, No. 18.) O l l l O l 13.0-38a [

Amend. X

8.1 REFERENCES

1. Tennessee Department of Transportation, Bureau of Planning and Programming, Office of Research and Planning,1980 Average Daily Traffic, Nashville, Tennessee,1980.

2. Telecon, Vincent, J. and Phillips, P. , Tennessee State Planning Office, to Baker, R. , TVA, May 5,1981.

3. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Postal Vacancy Survey - Knoxville, Tennessee, March 1980.

4. East Tennessee Development District, Mimeographed Data from Courthouse records on Value of New and Existing Housing Units,1979.

5. Board of Realtors, Knox, Loudon, and Roane Counties; Mimeographed Data on Value of New and Existing Housing Units,1981.

G. East Tennessee Development District, Mimeographed Data of Semi-Annual Apartment Survey Summary for Spring,1980. 10

7. East Tennessee Development District, Mimeographed Data on Additions to Housing Stock,1974 through First Quarter 1980.

8. Knoxville Apartment Council, Market Survey January,1981, Home Builders Association of Greater Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, February 1981.

9. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Analysis of the Knoxville, Tennessee Housing Market as of August 1,1980, Knoxville, Tennessee, September 1980.

10. Knoxville Board of Realtors, Multiple Listing Book, Vol.109, March 1981.

11. Manufactured Housing Institute, Quick Facts about the Manufactured Housing Industry, Arlington, Virginia, 1980.

12. Robert Freeman, Planning Director, East Tennessee Development District, Knoxville, Tennessee, personal interview, April 22, 1980.

13. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Water Resources, Water Systems Development Branch, phone survey, April 1981.

A U 13.0-41

Amend. X Dec. 1931

8.2 REFERENCES

1. Recreation as an Industry, prepared by Robert R. Nathan Associates, Inc.

for the Appalachian Regional Commission, Washington, DC. ,1966.

2. What New Jobs Mean to a Community, Research Study prepared by Economic Analysis and Study, Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Washington, DC. ,1973, pages 7 and 8.

3. Tennessee Department of Employment Security, Research and Statistics Section, Tennessee Covered Employment and Wages by Industry Statewide and by County, 1979, Nashville, Tennessee,1979.

8.3 REFERENCES

1. U.S. , Energy Research and Development Administration, Final Environmental Statement, Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Program, WASH - 1535, December 1975.

2. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Development, Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring And Mitigation 10 Report, May 31, 1980, Knoxville, Tennessee, January 1981.

3. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Development, Hartsville Nuclear Plants Socioeconomic Monitoring And Mitigation Report, March 31. 1979, Knoxville, Tennessee, October 1979.

4. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Development, Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring And Mitigation Report . December 30, 1979, Knoxville, Tennessee, October 1980.

5. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Services,

_Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Construction Employee Survey, September 1978, Knoxville, Tennessee, September 1980. G. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Navigation Development and Regional Studies, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Construction Employee Survey, October 1977, Knoxville, Tennessee, September 1978.

7. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Services, Results of May 1978 Survey of Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Construction Employees, Knoxville, Tennessee, October 1980.

8. National Academy of Sciences, Division of Engineering and Industrial Research , Highway Capacity Manual 1965 Special Report 87, Washington , D. C. , Highway Research Board,1965.

9. Tennessee Department of Transportation, Bureau of Planning and Programming, Office of Research and Planning,1980 Average Daily Traffic, Nashville, Tennessee, 1980.

13.0-42 (Next page is 13.0-45)

Amend. X Dec. 1931 a l 10 !,b

9.1 REFERENCES

1. U. S., Atomic Energy Commission, Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Program -

Proposed Final Environmental Statement, WASH-1535, December 1974 (herein-after cited as WASH-1535).

2. LMFBR Demonstration Plant Program Proceedings of Senior Utility Steering Committee and Senior Utility Technical Advisory Panel for the Period April 1971 through Jaunary 1972, WASH-1201, May 1971.

3. WASH-1535, Vol III.

4. Hubbert, M. K. , Energy Resources for Power Production, IAEA-SM-146/1, Proceedings of a Symposium, International Atomic Energy Agency,10-14 August 1970.

5. Hubbert, M. K., Energy Resources, in Resources and Man, W. K. Freeman &

Co., San Francisco, 1969.

6. WASH-1535, Vol I, Section 3.

%J A (__j 13.0-45

9.2 REFERENCES

O

1. U.S. , Atomic Energy Commission, Invitation for Proposals, Fourth Round, The LMFBR Demonstration Plant Program Under the Commission's Power Reactor Demonstration Program, May 1969.

I' . LMFBR Demonstration Plant Program Proceedings of Senior Utility Steering Committee and Senior Utility Technical Advisory Panel for the Period April 1971 through January 1972, WASH-1201, May 1971.

3. U.S. , Atomic Energy Conmission, Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Pro-gram - Proposed Final Environmental Statement, WASH-1535, December 1974.

4. Stearns, R. G. and Wilson, C. W. , Jr. , Relationships of Earthquakes and Geology in West Tennessee and Adjacent Areas, a Special Report for the Tennessee Valley Authority, January 1972.

5. LMFBR Demonstrat'on Plant Report of Technical Committee on Alter-native Hook-On Arrangements,15 February 1972.

6. U.S., Atomic Energy Commission, AEC Report on Sodium Reheat for LMFBR Demonstration Plant, Preliminary Draft, June 1972.

7. U.S. , Atomic Energy Commission, Division of Reactor Development and Technology, Status of LMFBR Reheat in Western Europe -- 1972_,

WASH-1219, Report of the United States of America LMFBR Sodium Reheat Team Visit to France, Germany (FRG), Netherlands and United Kingdom, 22 May - 6 June 1972.

8. Tennessee Valley Authority, LMFBR Clinch River Site - Combined Cycle Hook-On, Draft Report, no date.

9. Tennessee Valley Authority, Siting Report for Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Demonstration Plant, 2 August 1972.

10. Tennessee Valley Authority, Preliminary Information on the John Sevier Site as a Possible Location for an LMFBR Demonstration Plant, 31 March 1972 as revised 28 September 1973.

11. Kellberg, J. M. and Benziger, C. P. , Preliminary Geological Inves-tigations for the John Sevier_ Steam Plant, Tenressee Valley Authority, Division of Water Control Planning, Geologic Branch, Knoxville, Tennessee, 3 September 1952.

12. Tennessee Valley Authority, Preliminary Information on the Widows Creek Site as a Possible Location for an LMFBR Demonstration Plant, 31 March 1972 as revised 28 September 1973.

O 13.0-46

Amend. X Dec. 1981 INTRODUCTION This appendix to Chapter 8.0 contains a summary of the assumptions, methods and results of a quantitative analysis of notable demographic and socioeconomic effects of the construction and operation of the CRBRP. Focus is upon the results of that analysis. Information presented in this appendix includes descriptions of project-related population resulting from CRBRP employment by location and facilities and services necessary to accommodate this temporary population increase. The analysis summarized here considers project effects for two or more years and under two varying sets of assumptions. Migration condition A l-6 (26 percent) reflects TVA construction experience and ordinary competition for workers. Migration condition B reflects this same experience but allows for the possibility that other major construction 10 projects, especially the proposed Koppers Liquifaction Project, may hire workers from the area labor force at the same time as the CRBRP Project. This higher level of competition could raise the migration rate to as high

    ]  as 40 percent.

Project-related population, school enrollments and housing requirements are forecasted for each of the seven years of plant construction, while requirements for education', health care, public safety and other com-munity facilities and services are estimated for the peak year of plant construction and for a typical year of plant operation. These project effects are forecasted first under the assumption of normal competition for labor and that ?5 percent of the construction work force and 50 percent for project office, contractor support, and operations per-sonnel (over and above the number of workers already in the area as of February 1981) will move to a residence within the study area (migration condition A). The analysis is then repeated for conditions O C-1

Amend. X Dec. 1981 of high competition for labor using the same 50 percent mover rate of the three groups ;isted above with a 40 percent mover rate for the construction work force (migration condition B). The extent of construction work force migration is varied in this way to forecast CllBitP Project effects in recognition of the possibility of dif-fering degrees of competition for workers from the area labor force. At a lower level of competition a larger fraction of the construction work force will consist of workers hired from the area labor force, and migra-tion will be at a lower level. An increase in competitior. for area workers will result in a higher level of migration. 1.0 AREA POPULATION RESULTING FROM CRBRP PItOJECT-llELATED EMPLOYMENT 10 Area population resulting from CRBRP Project employm< nt for migration conditions A and B is reported in this section. Population resulting from direct employment for migration condition A is displayed in Table 1-1, while the corresponding figures for condition B are summarized in Table 1-2. Because workers are not expected to be relocating in the area to fill indirect employment jobs resulting from direct permanent employment, no new popu-lation associated with indirect employment is anticipated. For condition A, area population resulting from direct employment peaks at about 3,200 men , women, and children by the fourth year af ter the start of site preparation and levels at about 300 persons by the first year of plant operation (Table 1-1). Knox County will receive a population influx of 1,450 persons followed by Roane County (800 people), Anderson l County (640 people), and Loudon County (320 people). Oak Ridge (the l Anderson County portion) and the Kingston area are the two areas in the project area that will receive the largest population influx with 480 people each. No other community in the project area is expected to receive more than 320 people O C-2

e Amend. X Dec. 1931 During the years of plant ~ operation the stabilized population is expected to have a similar distribution. It is estimated that about 45 percent of the population will reside in Knox County (basically the West Knox County Area), about 25 percent will live in Roane County, about 20 percent in Anderson County, with the remaining 10 percent in Loudon County. Project-related population in the area rises and falls rapidly during the seven years of the construction phase (refer to Table 1-1). A similar pattern is repeated by the population resulting from the project under migration condition B (Table 1-2). However, the project-related the population rises to a higher peak of about 5,040 persons by the fourth year after the start of site preparation. Under migration condition B, Knox County will receive a population influx 10 of 2,270 persons followed by Roane County (1,260 people), Anderson County (1,010 people), and Loudon County (500 people). Oak Ridge and the Kingston area are the two areas in the study area that will receive the largest population influx with 760 people each. No ott,er , community in the project area is' expected to receive more than E00 people. The project-related population influx at no time contributes significantly to the total population of the study area. The greatest project-related increment (5,040) is only about 3 percent of the estimated 1980 study area population, suggesting that project effects at the area level are likely to be slight. At the county level, the project-related population _ in Anderson, Knox, and Loudon Counties is expected to be less than, 2 percent with the population influx in Roane County expected to be - about 2.5 percent, s sr O C-3

TABLE 1-1 AREA POPULATION RLS LTING FROM CRBRP DIRECT EMPLOYMENT FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A Typical Year Of++ Place Construction Phase (Year After Start), Plant Operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Anderson County 30 50 130 160 160 80 30 20 Oak Ridge 80 150 390 480 470 230 80 50 Knox County 230 440 1180 1450 1400 700 230 140 g Loudon County 50 100 260 320 310 160 50 30 Roane County 130 240 660 800 780 390 130 80 Four County Area 520 980 2620 3210 3120 1560 520 320

  + Site preparation projected to begin in 1981.
 ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. Area population resulting from CRBRP direct employment for migration Condition A is the same for all years af ter the first year of plant operation.
  *0utside of Oak Ridge.

SN P2 P O O O ,

s , i.

            -                                                                        TABLE 1-2 AREA POPULATION RESULTING FROM CRBRP DIRECT EMPLOYMENT FOR MIGRATION CONDITION B           -

Typical Year Of++ Place Construction Phase (Year After Start), Plant Operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. 1 Anderson County 40 80 210 250 240 120 30 '20 Oak Ridge 120 230 620 760 730 350 90 50 .n Knox County 350 680 1850 2270 2180 1040 270 140 a 10 Loudon County 80 150 410 500 480 230 60 30 Roane County 190 380 103G 1260 1210' 580 150 80 Four County Area 780 1520 4120 5040 4840 2320 600 320

   + Site pceparation projected to begin. in 1981.
  ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. Area population resulting from CRBRP direct employment for migration Condition B is the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.
   *0utside of Oak Ridge.

P'@ P

                                                                                                                                                 ..$ x

Amend. X Dec. 1981 l 2.0 FACILITIES AND SERVICES REQUIRED BY CRBRP PROJECT-RELATED POPULATION l l In this section some of the needs for private and public sector facilities l and services associated with project demographics are discussed. Emphasis is given to those needs for which the public sector is responsible. Selected for inclusion in this analysis are needs fer water and wastewater j treatment, educational, health care and public safety facilities and/or services . In addition, housing needs in the area are reported. These i 1 housing needs include forecasts of conventional houses, mobile home sites and apartment and rooms needed by the project-related population. The needs for facilities and services expected to be satisfied by local govern-ments include teachers and classrooms, hospital beds, policemen and firemen, and water and wastewater treatment facilities. Projected needs for physicians and dentists are also reported. In Section 3.0 the projected costs of these necessary increments to community facilities and/or services are discussed. 10 2.1 HOUSING REQUIREMENTS Forecasted housing cequirements for the CRBRP project-related population for migration conditions A and B are reported in this section (condition A represents a 26% inmover rate while condition B represents a 40% inmover rate). Housing requirements resulting from direct employment for each housing type are presented in Tables 2.1-1, 2.1-2, 2.1-3, and 2.1-4 for migration condition A, and in Tables 2.1-5, 2.1-6, 2.1-7, and 2.1-8 for migration condition B . For condition A, requirements for conventional houses (Table 2.1-1 peaks at about 600 by the fourth year after the start of site preparation. The greatest part (43%) of this estimated demand by the peak year is expected to occur in West Knox County. Mobile home site requirements (Table 2.1-2) peak at about 350 by the fourth year of construction. The greatest part O C-6

Amend. X Dec. 1931 Q (43%) of the peak demands occurs in Roane County followed by 35% in Knox County. It is estimated that approximately 75% of all inmoving workers who select mobile homes for housing accommodations will relocate in non-incorporated areas near towns and cities. Requirements for apart-ments and rooms (Table 2.1-3) peak at about 300 units. The greatest part of the peak demand (51%) occurs in Knox County (basically the West Knox County A ea) followed by Anderson County (including Oak Ridge) at 31%. There could be housing pressures in Oak Ridge for apartments because the peak year demand for this type of housing is considerably higher than the vacant units available in 1980. Ilousing requirements for migration condition B reflect an increased demand of about 60 percent over the demand for condition A and an identical pattern of distribution of housing types by percentage; e.g. , 48 percent of inmoving workers who relocate in Knox County will select single-family homes for both migration conditions A and B. The peak demand for each housing type is reached during the fourth year after O v the start of site preparation. During the peak year, the housing requirements needed to accommodate inmoving workers would be about 96C 10 conventional houses. 570 mobile homes, and 460 apartments and rooms (Tables 2.1-5, 2.1-6, and 2.1-7) . These estimates represent the cumula-tive housing requirements for housing units by type needed to accommodate project-related employees for the first four years of the construction period. During the peak year of construction, the incremental demand for housing accommodations would be about 370 units, an increase of about 180 single-family,100 mobile homes, and 90 apartment units over the housing require-ments for the third year of the construction period (Tables 2.1-5, 2.1-6, 2.1-7, and 2.1-8) . The greatest demand for coventional homes during the construction period will occur in West Knox County with about 420 units required followed by Anderson County (210 units) and Roane County (180 units). Mobile home site requirements (Table 2.1-6) are highest in Roane County where approximately 240 units are needed followed by Knox County (200 units). Requirements for apartments and rooms O C-7

Amend. X Dec. 1931 (Table 2.1-7) are highest in West Knox County with approximately 190 units needed followed by Oak Ridge (120 units) and Roane County (70 units). Even though migration condition B exceeds the demand for housing of migration condition A by 60 percent, no community other than Kingston, Lenoir City, or Oak Ridge would experience housing pressures during the peak construction period because of the ample number of existing available housing units and the number of units added to the total housing stock each year. Refer to section 8.1.3.1 for a discussion of vacancy rates experienced by communities and counties during the 1970's and to Table 8.1-11 for information on housing additions between 1970 and 1980. 10 During the plant operation phase of the project, it is estimated that approximately 125 workers (50% of the operational workforce total of 250) will move into the four-county area. Of the 125 workers who relocate in the project area, probably about 50 will live in West Knox County, 20 in both Oak Ridge and Kingston, with the other 35 selecting other communi-ties within easy commuting distance to the project site. None of the communities within the four-county area should experience any adverse housing pressures or effects as a result of inmoving operation CRBRP workers. O C-8

(w (3 q) C& 1 ) TABLE 2.1-1 i CRBRP PROJECT RELATED CUMULATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR ) CONVENTIONAL 110USES FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A Typical Year of Construction Phase (year af ter start), Plant Operation Place 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Anderson County

4 7 18 24 22 10 3 4 Oak Ridge 18 34 91 112 109 55 18 9 j

Knox County 46 89 238 294 283 143 50 26 10 c Loudon County 11 21 54 65 63 31 10 6 j Roane County , 20 36 96 118 114 57 18 15 Four County Area 99 187 497 613 591 296 99 60 l I Site preparation projected to begin in 1981.

     " Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for conventional houses for migration condition A are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.
      *0utside of Oak Ridge.

CD aa

                                                                                                                                                       * ::3 C.'

we C3 >< w

TABLE 2.1-2 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED CUMULATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR MOBILE ((0ME SITES FOR MICRATION CONDITION A Typical Year ot* Construction Phase (year after start), Plant Operation 2 3 '4 5 6 7 I Place 1 27 27 14 4 2 Anderson County

4 8 23 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oak Ridge O 1 127 122 61 20 12

                                                                           >- Knox County                                                       20   40         103 o

51 50 24 8 5 Loudon County 8 15 42 157 150 76 26 17 Roane County 26 47 126 294 362 349 175 58 36 Four County Area 58 110

                                                                                ' Site preparation projected to b gin in 1981.
                                                                               ++

Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for mobile home sites for migration condition A are the same for all years af ter the first year of plant operation.

                                                                                *0utside of Oak Ridge.

n n> f

C3 pa .CL D

00 >< W O O e

O O O 4 i TABLE 2.1-3 I CRBRP PROJh.CT RELATED CUMUIATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR APARTMENTS AND ROOMS FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A i i Typical Year of** f Construction Phase (gar af ter start), Plant Operation 4 5 6 7 I Place 1 2 3 14 12 6 3 2 l Anderson County

2 4 11 13 8 Oak Ridge 13 24 64 78 76 39 10 149 144 73 21 13 Knox County 24 46 119 O

9 5 3 2 h Loudon County 2 3 8 9

4

! Roane County 7 13 36 45 43 20 7 ( 295 284 143 47 29 Four County Area 48 90 238 i i

Site preparation projected to begin in 1981.

      ** Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for apartments and rooms for migration condition A are the same for all years af ter the first year of plant operation.
       *0utside of Oak Ridge.

e i ER nm

                                                                                                                                              *  "3 i                                                                                                                                               Q.

i we i @ CO >< e w t

TABLE t.1-4 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED CUMULATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL HOUSING TYPES FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A Typical Year of++ Construction Phase (year af ter start), Plant Op.e r a t i on 4 5 6 7 i 2 3 Place 1 30 10 6 20 $2 65 61 Anderson County

10 93 31 19

                                      ?!           58         155         190          185 Oak Ridge 549       277         90                     55 Knox County                     90          173         460         570 O                                                                                                         21                     13            10 39         104         125          122        60 Loudon County                  21 d.

N 51 31 97 258 320 307 154 Roane County 53 1,224 614 203 125 Four County Aret 205 387 1,029 1,270

Site preparation riojected to begin in 1981.

ff Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for all housing types for migration condition A are the same f er all years af ter the first year of plant operation.

        *0utside of Oak Ridge.

E

                                                                                                                                                   <> b,f n

a 3 l r .CL CD >< ed O O O o .

f ? I i TABLE 2.1-5 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED CUMULATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENTIONAL HOUSES FOR MIGRATION CONDITION B .; Typical Year of Construction Phase (year after start), Plant Operation Place 1 2 3 4 5' 6 7 1 Anderson County

6 11 29 36 34 16 4 4 I Oak Ridge 27 52 145 176 169 81 21 9 1

n 1 [ ICnox County 71 137 375 463 440 209 56 26- 10' i Loudon County 15 31 84 102 98 46 ~ 12 6 Roane County 28 54 149 182 178 85 22 15 Four County Area 147 285 782 959 919 437 115 60 , 1 i

Site preparation projected to begin in 1981.

                     " Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements'for conventional houses for migration condition B are the same for all years af ter the first year of plant operation.

i j *0utside of Oak Ridge. t 1 j i 4 j o e n

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         * ::3 CL '

) W* 03 >< 'l . w l

              .,m._     . _ _ . _ _ . , , _ _ . ...m.____. , _ _                               , - _    _ _ _ _ _ _                                  _ ___      -.                ._                                               ,,

TABLE 2.1-6 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED CUMULATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR MOBILP. HOME SITES FOR MIGRATION CONDITION B Typical Year of** Construction Phase (year after start), Plant Operation Place 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 i Anderson County

7 14 37 44 43 20 5 2 Oak Ridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c3 8

$[ Knox County 31 59 162 199 190 90 22 12 10 Loudon County 12 24 65 81 77 37 8 5 Roane County 37 72 198 243 233 111 2 17 Four County Area 87 169 462 567 543 258 61 36 Site preparation projected to begin in 1981.

  ** Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for mobile home sites for migration condition B are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.
   *0utside of Oak Ridge.

E b,f nn

                                                                                                                                        *   "3 pa .CL MD CO ><
                                                                                                                                        >d O                                                                      O                                                            O

f\ 'sj ) TABLE 2.1-7 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED CUMULATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR APARTMENTS AND ROOMS FOR MICRATION CONDITION B Typical Year of

Const ruction Phase (year af ter start), Plant Oreration t

l Place 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Anderson County

3 6 16 19 18 9 2 2 Oak Ridge 19 36 101 123 119 56 15 8 Knox County 35 69 190 234 224 107 27 13 g h

vi Loudon Cour ty 3 5 13 16 15 8 2 2 Roane County 11 22 58 72 69 32 10 4 Four County Area 71 138 378 464 445 212 56 29 Site preparation projected to begin in 1981. Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for apartments and rooms for migration condition B are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.

                      *Outside of Oak Ridge.

5 n

3 CL we W

CO >< w a

TABLE 2.1-8 CRBRP PROJECT RELATLD CUMULATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL HOUSING TYPES FOR MIGRATION CONDITION B Typical Year of** Construction Phase (year after start), Plant Operation Place 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 81 99 95 45 11 6 Anderson County

15 31 46 89 245 299 288 137 36 19 Oak Ridge O

727 896 854 407 107 55 [. en Knox County 136 265 10 162 199 191 91 23 13 Loudon County 31 59 148 407 497 479 227 61 31 Roane County 77 592 1,622 1,990 1,907 907 238 125 Four County Area 305

Site preparation projected to begin in 1981.

                               ** Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for all housing types for migration condition B are the same for all years af ter the first year of plant operation.
                                *0utside of Oak Ridge.

E b{ () (D

                                                                                                                                                                       = :3 C
                                                                                                                                                                       >4 . 3.

40 CO >< Ha G G e

Amend. X ! Dec. 1981 j 2.2 EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS The education needs reported here include project-related demands for regular teachers and classrooms. Present and projected school system i capacities and enrollments were obtained during a telephone survey. con-ducted September 1981. The education.needs presented in this section are based on 1980 school enrollments projected for the peak year of plant construction including the CRBRP project-related demand for each school system . These school enrollment forecasts for each of the nine relevant school systems for the aggregate of all types of project-related enrollments are shown in Table 2.2-1 for migration condition A and Table 2.2-2 for condition B. Needs for teachers to instruct these project-related enrollments (or students) are derived for the peak year of construction and a typical year of plant operation by dividing enrollment figures by pupil-per- 10 teacher standards.* The results of this procedure are reported in Table 2.2-3 for condition A and Table 2.2-4 for condition B. Teacher requirements for condition A (Table 2.2-3) reach a total of 15 teachers during the peak year of plant construction. No additional teachers would be required to instruct project-related students during plant operation. Classroom requirements for this migration condition (Table 2.2-5) reach a total of 15 classrooms during the peak year of plant construction. No additional classrooms would be required to accommodate project-related students during plant operation. Teacher requirements for migration condition B (Table 2.2-4) are 29 teachers during the peak year of plant construction. West Knox County

Tennessee pupil-per-teacher standards are 25 for K, 30 for 1-6, and 35 for 7-12.

O C-17

Amend. X Dec. 1981 would require 12 additional teachers followed by Roane County with 5, and Oak Ridge needing an increase of 4 additional teachers during the peak year of plant construction. All other school systems would need only 1-2 additional teachers during the peak of construction to accommo-date project-related students. No additional teachers would be required during the years of plant operation. The forecasted need for classrooms to accommodate the project-related enrollments is reported in Table 2.2-6 for migration condition B. These requirements are derived by multiplying enrollments by square feet-per-pupil standards and dividing these products by square feet-per-classroom standards.* West Knox County would require 12 additional classrooms followed by Roane County with 5, Oak Ridge needing an increase of 4 classrooms, with all other school systems needing 1-2 additional classrooms during the peak of construction to accommodate project-related students. No additional classrooms would be required during the years of plant operation. 10 To estimate the costs that might be incurred by the area school systems as a result of classroom needs, a comparison of projected capacities and enrollments is required. Migration condition B is used to estimate project-related school enrollments because it results in the larger influx of school children . Table 2.2-7 shows the present and projected school system capacities, enrollments, and excess capacities for both 1981 and the peak year of plant construction excluding project-related students.7 All of the school systems except Knox County have excess capacity in the 1981 school year. Knox County schools are currently overenrolled by a total

*The square feet-per-pupil figures are the Tennessee standards of 35 for K, 25 for 1-6, and 22 for 7-12; and the square feet-per-classroom figures are the Tennessee standards of 875 for K, 748 for 1-6, and 770 for 7-12.

O C-18

Amend. X Dec. 1981 of 90 students, less than 1 percent of the school system capacity. During v' the peak year of plant construction, only the Knox County School System is expected to have enrollments exceeding capacities by a noticeable level, and even in this case it would be only about 3 percent (500 students). Table 2.2-8 shows the projected school system excess capacities including the project-related students for migration condition B. During the peak year of construction, only the Knox County School System could experience enrollment levels noticeably exceeding system wide capacity. The over-enrollment for this system could be about 6 percent of the school system 10 capacity (880 students). Other school systems that would have enrollments exceeding capacities during the peak year of construction would be the Harriman and Loudon County systems. Harriman would experience over-enrollment by about 4 percent with the Loudon County School System overenrollnmnt only about 2 percent of the projected school system capacity for the school year coinciding with the peak year of plant construction. O V O C-19

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 2.2-1 O CUMULATIVE SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS FROM CRBRP PROJECT EMPLOYMENT FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A* System YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YT.AR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 Anderson - T X 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1-6 2 3 7 8 8 4 2 7-12 1 2 6 6 6 3 1 ' K-12 3 5 13 15 15 6 3 7 Clinton K 0 1 2 2 2 1 0 1-6 3 4 11 13 13 7 3 7-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K-12 3 5 13 15 15 6 3 Oak Ridge K 1 1 4 5 5 2 1 1-6 6 12 33 43 39 19 6 7-12 7 14 38 52 46 23 7 K-12 14 27 75 100 90 39 14 Roane K 1 3 6 7 7 3 1 1-6 10 18 49 65 59 30 10 7-12 9 16 45 58 54 27 9 K-12 20 37 100 130 120 52 20 Harriman K 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1-6 1 3 11 13 13 6 1 7-12 15 15 8 3 10 3 5 13 K-12 5 9 25 30 30 13 5 Knox K 3 6 14 16 16 7 3 1-6 19 33 90 108 108 54 18 7-12 20 35 97 116 116 58 19 K-12 41 74 201 240 240 104 39 Knoxville K 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 1-6 2 4 11 13 13 7 2 7-12 3 5 13 15 15 8 3 K-12 5 9 25 30 30 11 5 Loudon K 1 1 3 4 4 2 1 1-6 3 6 17 20 20 10 3 7-12 2 5 13 16 16 8 2 K-12 6 12 33 40 40 38 6 Lenoir City K 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1-6 1 2 6 7 7 3 1 7-12 2 4 10 12 12 5 2 K-12 3 6 17 20 20 8 3

Area school enrollments f rom CRBRP project employment for migration condition A include school age children of both construction and operation workers.

O C-20

Amend. X Dec. 1981 O TABLE 2.2-2 C12fLIATIVE SCHOOL ENROLI2:ENTS RESULTING FROM CRBRP FROJECT E'iPLOYMENT FOR MICRATION CONDITION B* System YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YE AR 3 YT.AR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 Anderson K 0 1 2 2 2 1 0 1-6 2 4 11 13 12 5 2 7-12 2 3 8 10 10 5 1 K-12 4 8 21 25 24 11 3 Clinton K 2 4 4 5 5 2 0 1-6 8 14 17 20 19 9 3 7-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K-12 to 18 21 25 24 11 3 Oak Ridge K 1 3 8 9 8 4 1 1-6 9 17 49 64 59 28 8 7-12 11 21 58 77 69 32 9 K-12 21 41 115 150 136 64 18 Roane K 3 7 10 13 11 5 1 1-6 15 28 78 97 91 42 to 7-12 11 21 69 90 82 38 9 K-12 29 56 157 200 184 85 20 Harrtman K 0 0 3 3 3 2 0 1-6 4 7 18 22 21 10 2 10 7-12 4 8 21 25 24 12 3 K-12 8 15 42 50 48 24 5 KDOX K 4 8 24 29 28 15 3 1-6 24 48 140 171 168 81 22 07-12 K-12 25 53 51 107 149 313 180 380 177 373 85 181 23 48 Knoxville K 0 1 4 4 4 2 0 K-6 4 7 19 23 22 10 2 7-12 4 7 19 23 22 9 3 K-12 8 15 42 50 48 21 5 Loudon K 1 2 5 6 5 2 1 1-6 5 10 27 32 31 16 3 7-12 4 7 21 25 24 13 3 K-12 10 19 53 63 60 31 7 Lenoir City K 1 1 2 2 1 0 0 1-6 2 4 11 13 13 6 1 7-12 3 6 18 22 21 10 2 K-12 6 11 31 37 35 16 3

Area school ears 11ments from CRERP project employment for migration condition B include school age children of both construction and operation workers.

O C-21

fnend. X Dec. 1931 TABLE 2.2-3 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOL

TEACHERS i FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A Peak Year of Plant Construction Tyr s1 Year of Plant Operation "

System Students Teachers Stud nts Teachers Anderson I

O O K

1-6 8 1 , 7-12 6 1

2 l K-12 15 l Clinton K 2
0 0
2
1-6 13
2 K-6 15 Oak Ridge K 5
1 0 4
1-6 43 1 7-12 52 1 5 K-12 100 2 10 0 Roane
1 K 7 6
l-6 65 2 7-12 58 2 5 4
K-12 130 12 Harriman 2
O O K

10 1-6 13 2 7-12 15 1
3 K-12 30 Knox
K 16 1 1 l-6 108 4 10 24
7-12 116 3 22
K-12 240 8 Knoxville 2
0 0 K

1-6 13 1

2 7-12 15
3 K-12 30 Loudon
4
0 K

2

l l-6 20 1
2
f 7-12 16 K-12 40 1 4 Lenoir City
O O K 1 7 1 l-6 *
1 7-12 12 20
2 K-12 Total 60 0 K-12 620 15

                         ' Tennessee pupil per-teacher standards are 25 for K, 30 for 1-6, and 35 for 7-12.
                       " Peak year of plant construction expected to occur in 1985.

I

                      +++P lant operation expected to began in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for stutents and teachers for sagtition condition A are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.

l l *Less than one-half. C-22

Amend. X Dec. 1981

 /N                                                  TABLE 2.2-4
 \/
    )

CRBRP PROJECT RELaiED REQUIREMENTS FOR SgHOOL TEAClERS FOR MICRATION CONDITION B Peak Year of Plant Construction Typical Year of Plant Operation System Students Teachers Students Tea che rs Anderson K 2

0 0 1-6 13 1 7-12 10 1
2
K-12 25 Clinton K 3
0 0 2
1-6 22 1 K-6 25 1 2
Oak Ridge 9
1 K

64 4

1-6 2 7-12 77 2 5 4 10
K-12 150 Roane
1 K 13 3 6
1-6 97 2 5
7-12 90 12
K-12 200 5 Harriman K 3
0 0 2
1-6 f] 7-12 22 25 1

1 1 10 (bj K-12 50 2 3 Knot

K 27 1 1 6 10 1-6 171 7-12 182 5 11 22
K-12 380 12 Knoxville K 2
0 0 1-6 22 1 1 7-12 25 1 2 2 3 *

! K-12 50 i Loudon K 5

0 0 2
i 1-6 33 1 7-12 27 1 2 l
l K-12 65 2 4 Lenoir City K 2
0 0 1-6 12 1 I

7-12 21 1 1 K-12 35 1 2 1 Total f K-12 980 29 60 0 i Tennessee pups t per-teacher standards are 25 for K, 30 for 1-6, and 35 for 7-12.

        " Peak year of plant construction expected to occur in 1985.

J ... Plant operation expected to began tn 198A. CRBRP protect-related requtrements for stu. tents and teachers f or mt aratton (ondition B are the same for all years atter the strst year at plant operatton. j )

             *Less than one-half.

! C-23 i

knend. X Dec. 1Q81 TABLE 2.2-5 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR SCH(()L CLASSROOMS FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A Peak Year of Plant Construction" Typical Year of Plant Operation " System Students Classrooms Students Classrooms Anderson K 1

0 0 1-6 8
1
7-12 6
1
K-12 15
2
Clinton K 2
0 0 1-6 13
2
K-6 15
2
Oak Ridge K 5
1
1-6 43 1 4
7-12 52 1 5
K-12 100 2 10
Roane K 7
1
1-6 65 2 6
7-12 58 2 5
K-12 130 4 12
Harriman K 2
0 0 1-6 13
2
10 7-12 15
1
K-12 30
3
Knox K 16 1 1 1-6 108 4 10
7-12 116 3 11
K-12 240 8 22
Knoxville K 2
0 0 1-6 13
1
7-12 15
2
K-12 30
3
Loudon K 4
O O 1-6 20 1 2
7-12 16
2
K-12 40 1 4
Lenoir City K 1
0 0 1-6 7 1 7-12 12
1 K-12 20
2
Total

  '-12            620                      15             60                       0

Tennessee pupil-per-teacher standards are 25 for K, 30 for 1-6, and 35 for 7-12.

 " Peak year of plant ccustruction expected to occur in 1985.

'" Plant operation expected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for students and teachers for migration condition A are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.

   *Less than one-half.

C-24

Amend. X-Dec. 1981 TABLE 2.2-6 \ CRBRPPROJECTRELATEDREQUIREMENTSFORSCH@LCLASSROOMS FOR MICRATION CONDITION B Peak Year of Plant Construction Typical Year of Plant Operation *** System Students Classrooms Students Classrooms Anderson K 2

O O 1-6 13
1
7-12 10
1
K-12 25
2
Clinton K 3
0 0 1-6 22 1 2
K-6 25 1 2
Oak Ridge K 9
1
1-6 64 2 4
7-12 77 2 5
K-12 150 4 10
Roane K 13
1
1-6 97 3 6
7-12 90 2 5
K-12 200 5 12
Harriman K 3
0
1-6 22 1 2
7-12 25 1 1
K-12 50 2 3
10

Knox K 27 1 1

1-6 171 6 10
7-12 182 5 11
K-12 380 12 22
Knoxville K 4
0 0 1-6 23 1 1
7-12 23 1 2
K-12 50 2 3
Loudon K 5
0
1-6 33 1 2
7-12 27 1 2
K-12 65 2 4
Lenoir City K 2
O O

\;

1-6 12

1
7-12 21 1 1
K-12 35 1 2
Total K-12 980 29 60 0
Tennessee pupil per-teacher standards are 25 for K, 30 for 1-6, and 35 for 7-12.

    ** Peak year of plant construction expected to occur in 1985.
   *** Plant operation expected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for students and teachers for migration condition 8 are the same for all years af ter the first year of plant operation.
     *Less than one-half.

C-25

TABLE 2.2-7 PRESENT AND PROJECTED SCIIOOL SYSTEM CAPACITIES ENROLIJ1ENT, AND EXCESS CAPACITIES 1981 Peak Year of Plant Construction # System Capacity Enrollment Excess Capacity Enrollment Excess Anderson 9,278 8,032 1,246 9,278 8,458 820 Clinton 1,065 905 160 1,065 847 218 $ Oak Ridge 6,200 5,042 1,158 6,200 6,000 200 6,652 487 7,230 6,080 1,150 10 Roane 7,139 llarriman 2,265 2,204 61 2,265 2,312 -47 Knox 15,113 15,203 -90 15,300 15,800 -500 Knoxville 37,800 25,931 11,869 NA NA NA Loudon 3,806 3,756 50 3,806 3,822 -16 Lenoir City 2,057 1,984 73 2,057 2,000 57

 + Peak year of plant construction expected to occur in 1985.                                                 R E" PE "
 "Only the north, northwest, and southwest sectors of the Knox School System.                                 ,_..

Ex

NA - Not available. Source: TVA phone survey of school system superintendents, September 1981. O O O

Amend. X Dec. 1981

    /~'s                                                                                                 TABLE 2.2-8 PROJECTED SC1100L SYSTEM EXCESS CAPACITIES AND INCREMENTAL CRBRP PROJECT ENROLLMENT FOR PEAK YEAR OF PLANT CONSTRUCTION (MIGRATION CONDITION B)*

Without Project With Project System Excess Capacity Project Enrollment Excess Capacity Anderson 820 25 795 Clinton 218 25 193 Oak Ridge 200 150 50 l Roane 1,150 200 950 lia rriman -47 50 -97 Knox -500 380 -880 10 Loudon -16 65 -81 k-- Lenoir City 57 35 22 i i l

                                         + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.
                                         *The Knoxville City Systen is not included in this table because they were unable to provide projecti-ns for 1985 because of the uncertainty of Knoxville's annexation proposals. The K-12 project enrollment is 50 for this system.

O C-27 i I i

Amend. X Dec. 1981 2.3 HEALTH CARE REQUIREMENTS O The project-related population increases for the four counties surrounding the project area during the peak year of construction of the CRBRP for migration condition A are estimated to be: Anderson - 640, Knox - 1,450, Loudon - 320, and Roane County - 800. Tables 2.3-1, 2.3-3, and 2.3-5 indicate the number of hospital beds, physicians and dentists that would be necessary to accommodate the project-related population that moves into the project area for both the peak year of construction and a typical year of plant operation based on standards considered desirable by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services of four beds and one physician for each 1,000 persons and one dentist for each 4,000 8 persons. Only 13 beds, 2 physicians, and 1 dentist would be needed to accommodate the project-related workers that move into the project area for the peak year of construction. No additional health care requirements would be needed during the years of plant operation except for the use of 1 bed. The project-related population increases for the four counties surrounding the project area during the peak year of construction of the CRBRP for migration condition B are estimated to be: Anderson - 1,010, Knox - 2,270, Loudon - 500, and Roane County - 1,260. Using the same standards listed above, the number of hospital beds, physicians, and dentists that would be necessary to accommodate the project-related population that moves into the project area for the peak year of construction would be only 20 beds, 5 physicians, and 1 dentist for the entire four county area (Tables 2.3-2,

2. 3-4, and 2. 3-6) . There would not be any shortages in hospital beds or noticeable decline in the quality of primary care physicians or dental services as a result of the peak year project-related population for either migration condition A or B because of the low occupancy rates for hos-pital bed use and the high number of physicians and dentists currently practicing within the four county area. Descriptions of existing health O

C-28

~_

Amend. X Dec. 1981 care facilities and services, including data on occupancy rates and O practicing physicians and dentists, within the four-county area are prcsented in sections 2.2.1.5 and 8.1.3.4 and Tables 2.2-12 and 8.1-18. 10 l O i O C-29

e" . P -@ w 0 1 s

           " ns od i el

d 1

1 1 d b s e O tl l n a ao _ r ti e it pa _ A p O s r _ N oe h p - O t o I n r _ T a ot _ I l . D P f n N a O f sl C o t p - n N r ef O a mo I e n e T Y o rr A i i a R l t ue G a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 qy l cl 2 5 4 3 8 2 e i t i u 1 3 rt pp s R y o d r O TP ei F t f a S l e D eh E rt - l I 5 t r I 8 ce A 9 et 1 jf T 1 3

   - I P
           'nods        1     2     6     1    ';    3      n oa r

S i e 1 i ps 2 0 tB r _ 1 c r P a u . 1 _ E u c R e B y L R r B A T O F S T C t s n o c t o o R Cl l a 9 N 8 r E t d 8 o 1 t n e 9f E a t c 1 e R l I P e nm a - U j i Q f o s E o r n R n p i e r o gh _ D ai n et E e t 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b T Y a 6 8 5 2 0 1 i e A l 1 4 4, 3 8 2, t or

      !      k       u                                       c     t a r        a p                  1                 3      u P        e o                                           r    dA P    P                                        t        e T                                                      s     t n C                                                     n      c o

_ E o ei J c jt e oi g O t rd d f _ R P n pn i l a o R a P l nc h R p o k - B i y in a e _ R t f t o O u C n y o ai o u t y rt f o y n t r ea o n e C t u n a pr a c e n o u e o g e h a n g u C o y i d t 1 o d o C t m i P s i C n k n s s r R o e a a r t s e x d n a e l o u e. d k o u a e P Pf O l n a n o o r

t ':

d A O K L R A t I O o18

i 4 { ! I i TABLE 2.3-2 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR l!0 SPITAL BEDS FOR MIGRATION CONDITION B j l i Peak Year of Plant Construction + Typical Year of Plant Operation ++ Place Pamilation Beds Population Beds a Anderson County

u0 1 20 Oak Ridge 760 3 50 ** !

Knox County 2,270 9 140 1 Loudon County 500 2' 30 ** i Roane County 1,260 5 80 :

    .1 l     g   Area                                                             5,040                              20'             320                         1 l
                                                                                                                                                                                   -i
          , Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985. ,                                         .

t d l

         ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988.                                                 CRBRP project-related requirements for hospital beds j            for migration condition B are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.                                                                             l i
          *0utside of Oak Ridge.                                                                                                                                                      ,

i **Less than one-half. ,

i ; 1 s < .z f O. 1 s. i

                                                                                                                                                                     $x        -
                                                                                                                                                                                 . :-t
                                                                                                                                                                             %; Ji_;

e

9

  -    ,             v.  - .-               e                                   , , . ~ . . , , - -   e                               - - - - - -

7g , y

Nm3Q* > En * >*- @CO*e-0 1 i n s o n a d b s e O t i * *- * *

l n ao a c '
1- * *
r i t i es i t py pa A Oh s r P oe h p N t O n o I a r T l ot I P f n D a N f sl o t p O n C r, ef N a mo e

O e n r r I Y o i a T i_ ue A l t qy R a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 G pl 2 5 4 1

                                         '    8       2              e I      i u                   1                 3              rt lf       pp                                                         s yo                                                 d r R      TP                                                     ei O                                                            tf F                                                             a l       e

/ S eh N rt A 5 t r I C 8 c e I 9 et

1 jf 3 S

     -  Y       ns                                                   oa 3    l i       on                                             n     r., s P     i       a

1 < 1 2 i r

2 t i k

R cc r P a E O ui u R e .

L F r s c B y l l A T S T N E C t y o sh nP t c o o R Cl l a O M 8 r E t d 8 o R n e 9f I a t c 1 e U l Q P e nm E j i a R f o s o r n D n p i e gh E r o n et T ai o b A et 0 0 0 0 0 0 L Y a 6 8 5 2 0 1 i e E 1 1 4 4, 3 8 2, t or R c t a kai1n 1 3 u T e o r dA C PP t e E s t n J n c o O o ei R c jt e oi g P f t rd d P n pn i l H a o R a B l nc h R p o k - C 'y- i n a e t f t o O n n y o ai o u t y rt f o y n t ._ r ea o n u n a pr a e c C e t n o u _ e og e h _ y a n g u C o _ i d t l o d o C _ t m i P s i C n . k n s s r R o e a ar t s d e k x o d n n a a e _ P e l Pf o 0 n L e n a n o o r _+ +

                                                                  +
                                                                                <  1'-

A^ A O K L R A O Id s

.=

i O O , O l TABLE 2.3-4 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR PlfYSICIANS FOR MIGRATION CONDITION U' - Peak Year of Plant Construction Typical Year _of Plant Operation Place Physicians Population Physicians Ponu_lation Anderson County

250 ** 20 **

I 760 50 ** Oak Ridge 1 140 ** Knox County 2,270 2 30 ** Loudon County 500 1 1,260 80 ** j Roane County 1 10

    ?                                                                                                **

I d Area 5,040 5 320 i 4

         + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.
        ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for hospital beds for migration condition B are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.
         *0utside of Oak Ridge.
        **Less than one-half.

i 1 P@ P

TABLE 2.3-5 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR DENTISTS FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A

Peak Year of Plant Construction Typicr.1 Year of Plant Operation " Place Population Dentists Population Dentists Anderson County

160 ** 20 **

Oak Ridge 480 ** 50 ** Knox County 1,450 140 ** Loudon County 320 30 ** Roane County 800 ** 80

   $   Area                                                         3,210          1                 320                       **

10

        + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.
       ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988.                      CRBRP project-related requirements for hospital beds for migration condition A are the same for all years af ter the first year of plant operation.
        *0utside of Oak Ridge.

a

       **Less than one-half.

SN Pa W O O O

O v J i l TABLE 2.3-6 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR DENTISTS FOR MIGRATION CONDITION B Peak Year of Plant Construction + Typical Year of Plant Operation*+ Place __ h ulation Dentists Population Dentists Anderson County

250 ** 20 **

Oak Ridge 760 ** 50 ** Knox County 2,270 1 140 ** Loudon County 500 ** 30 ** 10 i Roane County 1,260 ** 80 **

d Area 5,040 1 320 0 l

           + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.
          ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for hospital beds for migration condition B are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.
           *0utside of Oak Ridge.
          **Less than one-half.

EN Pa

~P

Amend. X Dec. 1981

,      2. .I  PUBLIC SAFETY

! O Public safety needs are concerned with possible expansion of law enforce-ment and fire protection services to maintain existing levels of those services during the peak population influx. Given the incremental nature and moderate size of the population influx in relation to the area's population, there chould be no need for expansion of those services. As

                                                                                 .           10 indicated in Table 2.4-1, the current ratios of law enforcement officers per 1,000 residents for the area jurisdictions would experience insignifi-cant changes if any as a result of either population influx scenario.

Thus, the current levels of service would be maintained. No expansion of fire protection services should be necessary to maintain existing levels of services either as a result of the small project-related peak year population increase distributed throughout the study area where it is estimated that the population exceeds 200,000 people. O I t l l O' C-36

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 2.4-1 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS /1,000 POPULATION Current Migration Migration Location (1981) Condition A* Condition B* Anderson County .62 .62 .62 Clinton 2.29 2.25 2.23 Oak Ridge 1.53 1.49 1.48 Knox County .53 .53 .53 Knoxville 1.68 1.68 10 1.68 Loudon County .58 .57 .57 Lenoir City 1.66 1.61 1.59 Roane County .50 .49 .49 Kingston 1.60 1.52 1.48 Rockwood 2.26 2.23 2.22 Harriman 1.57 1.56 1.53 (}

    *These ratios were determined by applying the sum of the estimated peak population influx and existing population to the current number of officers.

i ( l i l l l , O C-37 (

Amend. X Dec. 1981 2.5 WATER SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS O The water supply requirements for the area are estimated for urban and rural places by applying an urban utilization rate of 133 gallons-per-day (gpd) per person and a rural rate of 92.5 for the Knoxville-SMSA.* These requirements for a typical year of plant operation are reported for condition A in Table 2.5-1 and for condition B in Table 2.5-2. Condition A requirements for the peak year of construction total about 350 thousand gpd and about 36 thousand gpd for a typical year of plant operation (Table 2.5-1) . The geographic distribution of this need is congruent with that of the project-related population. Requirements for condition B reach about 550 thousand gpd at peak construction and abou' 36 thousand gpd for each year during plant operation for migration condition B (Table 2.5-2). 10 At the present time, most of the utility districts within the study area have considerable excess water treatment capacities. In addition, many water utility districts have plans to increase their treatment capacities within the next few years. Refer to section 8.1.3.3.1 and Table 8.1-16 for information on water system treatment capacities, daily consumption rates, and facility expansion plans. With the large excess capacities now available and the plans for increasing capacities in the near future, there seems to be an adequate water supply to accommodate projcat-related demand.

Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area including Anderson, Blount, and Knox Coun ties .

O C-38

O O O TABLE 2.5-1 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER SUPPLY FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A Peak Year of Plant Constructio_n+ Typical Year of Plant Operation ++ Water Water Place Population (1,000 gpd) Population (1,000 gpd) Anderson County

Urban 80 10.7 10 1.4 Rural 80 7.4 10 0.9 Oak Ridge Urban 480 63.8 50 6.7 8 Roane County 10 Urban 400 53.2 40 5.3 Rural 400 37.0 40 3.7 Knox County Urban 160 21.3 15 2.0 Rural 1,290 119.5 125 11.5 Loudon County Urban 160 21.3 15 2.0 Rural 160 14.8 15 2.0 Area 3,210 349.0 320 35.5 5N

  + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.                                            o g
 ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for water supply       o.

for migration condition A are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation. g

  *0utside of Oak Ridge                                                                                    -

l TABLE 2.5-2 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER SUPPLY FOR MIGRATION CONDITION B Peak Year of Plant Construction + Typical Year of Plant Operation ++ Water Water Place Population QOOO sp_d) Population (1,000 ypd) Anderson County

Urban 125 16.6 10 1.4 Rural 125 11.6 10 0.9 Oak Ridge Urban 760 101.0 50 6.7

 $  Roane County l        Urban                        630                                                 84.2          40                              5.3 j        Rural                        630                                                 58.3          40                              3.7 I

Knox County I Urban 250 33.3 15 2.0 l Rural 2,020 187.0 125 11.5 1 Loudon County Urban 250 33.2 15 2.0 , Rural 250 23.1 15 2.0 Area 5,040 548.3 320 35.5 o

      + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.                                                                                 g[
     ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRDRP project-related                               requirements for water supply               -

g for migration condition B are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation. g-

      *0utside of Oak Ridge                                                                                                                         co x 9                                                                                     9                                                     0

Amend. X Dec. 1981 2.6 WASTE DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Waste disposal requirements include wastewater collection and treatment and solid waste collection and disposal. Estimates of wastewater and solid waste generated by the project-related populations in the area for migration conditions A and B are reported in this section. Waste-water generation is based upon a rate of 100 gpd per person and solid waste generation upon a rate of four pounds-per-day (ppd) per person.* Forecasts for wastewater generation for the peak year of plant construc-tion and a typical year of plant operation are reported for condition A in Table 2.6-1 and for condition B in Table 2.6-2. At peak construc-tion, about 320 thousand gpd of wastewater is generated in the area for condition A (Table 2.6-1) and about 500 thousand gpd for condi-tion B (Table 2.6-2). During plant operation, the corresponding 10 figure is 32 gpd. j All of the wastewater utility districts in the study area have excess capacities. More over, Oak Ridge, Kingston, and Harriman plan increases for their wastewater treatment facilities between 1980 and 1985. Oak Ridge presently has under construction a new 12 mgd plant that should be completed by 1983 to provide tertiary treatment. Kingston and Harriman I are both planning new plants that would give them secondary treatment capabilities. All of the utility systems that are not proposing increases have excess capacities. Refer to section 8.1.3.3.2 and Table 8.1-17 for information on wastewater system treatment capacity, average daily flow, and facility expansion plans.

    *These rates apply to the Knoxville SMSA.

O G C-41

Amend. X Dec. 1981 The wastewater utilities have enough excess capacities to accommodate additional growth. Problems may arise, however, in the collection service. Most of the wastewater service systems are associated with municipalities, while most of the rural areas must rely on septic tanks and disposal fields. Ilowever, much of the soil in these counties is not suitable for these sub-surface systems. Therefore, because of the distribution of the peak year project-re!ated population throughout the four-county area, it seems unlikely that areas unsuited for septic tank use would experience large numbers of inmovers to the point where collection disposal systems would be required. Forecasts for solid waste generation for both the peak year of plant construction and a typical year of plant operation are reported for condition A in Table 2.6-3 and for condition B in Table 2.6-<l. For 10 both conditions A and B the amount of solid waste generated is approximately 1,300 ppd during plant operation. The amount varies between about 13,000 and 20,000 ppd at peak construction for con-ditions A and B, respectively. The projected amounts are insignificant in relation to the current amount of waste handled per day in the four counties (about 1,025 tons). i r l 1 l l l l l C-42 1 1 i

7s (~T { }

  \ .,                                                   i    -

L-TABLE 2.6-1 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIRER!ENTS FOR WASTEWATER DISPOSAL FOR flIGRATION CONDITION A Peak Year of Plant Construction + Tyyical Year of Plant Operation ++ Wastewater Wastewater Place Population (1,000 gpd_1 Population (1,000 gpd) Aaderson County

160 16.0 20 2.0 Oak Ridge 480 48.0 50 5.0 Roane County 800 80.0 80 8.0 Knox County 1,450 145.0 140 14.0 i.

c 10 w Loudon County 320 32.0 30 3.0 Area 3,210 321.0 320 32.0

     + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.
    ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for wastewater -4sposal for migration condition A are the same for all years after the first / ear of plant operation.
     *0utside of O u didge E3 Pe"

TABLE 2.6-2 CRBRP 1ROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTEWATER DISPOSAL FOR MIGRATION CONDITION B Peak Year of Plant Construction + Typical Year of Plant Opr ration ++ , Wastewater l Wastewater Place Population (1,000 gpd) Population (1,000 gpd) 25.0 20 2.0 Anderson County

250 760 76.0 50 5.0 Oak Ridge 1,260 126.0 80 8.0 Roane County 10 2,270 227.0 140 14.0 7 Knox County

         $                                                   50.0               30                   3.0 Loudon County               500 5,040                  504.0              320                  32.0 Area
            + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.
           ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for wastewater disposal for migration condition B are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.
            *0utside of Oak Ridge l

l S$ Pe" O O O l_.________

p} O (

                                                      %J                                             Cw')

v TABLE 2.6-3 CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FOR MIGRATION CONDITION A Peak Year of Plant Construction + y pical Year of Plant Operation ++ T Solid Waste Solid Waste { Place Population (100 lbs @ d Population (100 lbs/ day Anderson County

160 6.4 20 0.8 Oak Ridge 480 19.2 50 2.0 Roane County 800 32.0 80 3.2

 ? Knox County                1,450                 57.6                140                   5.6        10

, Loudon County 320 12.8 30 1.2 l I Area 3,210 128.0 320 12.8

    + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.
   ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988. CRBRP project-related requirements for solid waste disposal for migration condition A are the same for all years af;er the first year of plant operation.
    *0utside of Oak Ridge Ed Pa

l l 1 TABLE 2.6-4 1 l CRBRP PROJECT RELATED REQUIRER 1ENTS FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL F011 flIGRATION CONDITION B Peak Year of Plant Construction + Typical Year of Plant Operation ++ Solid Waste Solid Waste Place Population (100 lbs/ day _)) Population (100 lbs/ day Anderson County

250 10.0 20 0.8 Oak Ridge 760 30.4 50 2.0 Roane County 1,260 50.4 80 3.2 10 l

{ Knox County 2,270 90.8 140 5 .6 l i Loudon County 500 20.0 30 1.2 l Area 5,040 201.6 320 12.8

     + Peak year of plant construction projected to occur in 1985.
    ++ Plant operation projected to begin in 1988.                                    CRBRP project-related requirements for solid waste disposal for migration condition R are the same for all years after the first year of plant operation.
     *0utside of Oak Ridge S$

Pe" O O O

Amend. X Dec. 1981 o 2.7 COMMUTER TRAFFIC Table 2.7-1 provides a perspective as to the day shift commuter traffic effects on the five key highway segments in the study area anticipated to be significantly impacted by the CRBRP commuter traffic for both migration conditions A and B. The existing levels of service for the hour in which the CRBRP commute- traffic will be added to existing traffic volumes are either B or C e:c-apt for State Route 95 (SR 95) between I-40 and Bear Creek Road which cur-rently has a D level of service. (Refer to the Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 87, pages 80-81 published in 1965 for complete definitions of the different traffic levels of service.) 10 The levels of service for each significantly impacted state highway segment will be the same for both migration conditions during the peak year of construction. Movers are anticipated to relocate in p areas outside the impacted highway network surrounding the plant V site and travel the same impacted highway segments that they would were they not to relocate. Therefore, the number of commuters traveling the significantly impacted highway segments will remain essentially the same regardless of the percent of movers . During the peak year of construction for both migration conditions, commuters will experience a level of service of D or better on all segments near the Site except for SR 95 between 1-40 and Bear Creek Road where the level of service is anticipated to level E. v C-47

Amend. X Dec. 1981 Level of service D represents a condition in which tolerable operating speeds can be maintained, though this may be considerably affected by iluctuations in traffic volume which may in turn cause substan-tial drops in operating speeds. Level of service E represents a condition of lower operating speeds than in level D with traffic volumes at or near the capacity of the highway. During the peak year of construction, commuters trawling along SR 95 between 1-40 and Bear Creek Road will experience unstable flow with stoppages of momentary duration being possible during the daily project peak 10 commuting hours. During the peak commuting hour of a typical year of plant operation. the levels of service experienced by commuters for the five highway segments near the Site will be identical to the levels of service that would exist for the same hour without the CRBRP traffic included (refer to Table 2.7-1). During a typical year of plant operation, less than 6 percent of the commuting peak hour traffic volumes on the impacted state highway segments are estimated to be CRBRP project-related. O l l 1 i l I l O C-48

O t J TABLE 2.7-1 CRBRP COMMUTER TRMFIC IMPACTS ON KEY HICHWgY SECNENTS FOR MICRATION

CONDITIONS A AND B l

Projected Level of"# g Projected Levet of Projected Level of Service for Hour g Existins Level of Service for Hour Service for Hour With CABRP Commuter Existing Service for Hour Wich CRBRP Commuter With CRBRP Commuter Traffic Contributes Peak Hour With CRBRP Commuter Traffic Contributes Traffic Contributes During a Typical Year lhghwa_y_ Segment Level of Service Traffic Contributes for Migration condition A for Migration Condition B of Plant Operation (1994)

1. State Route 58 between I-40 and D C D D E Bear Creek Road (CRBRP Access Road)

2. State Route 58 Between Bear Creek D B D D E Road (CRBRP Access Road) and ORGDP

3. State Route 58 Between ORGDP and D B C C D Intersection State Route 95

4. State Route 95 from Intersection E C D D F State Route 58 to Beginning of n 4-Lane in Oak Ridge i

 $ 5. State Route 95 Between I-40 and                 E                       D                      E                          E                      F Bear Creek Road (CRBRP Access Road) 10

[Peakyearofconstructionexpectedtooccurin1985. Plant operation expected to begin in 1988. m Based on Tennessee Department of Transportation average daily traf fic counts for 1978-1981. Projected service levels are the same with or without the CRBRP traf fic. Operation workforce is expected to commute to and from the plant during the existing peak hour. Note: Assumptions used in evaluating the traffic situation include.

1. No sponsored van and bus program.

2. Commuter vehicle occupancy = 2.0 for migration conditions A and B and 1.5 for CRBRP operation workforce comuters.

3. No truck deliveries to construction site during shif t comuting hours.

4. CRBRP construction work shif t hours will be staggered such that CRBRP comuting traffic will not coincide with the existing non-CRBRP related peak hour 'raffic.

5. Intersections SR95 and SR58, SR58 and Bear Creek Road, and SR95 and Bear Creek Road to be upgraded prior to significant construction employment buildup.

6. Annual increase in non-CRBRP related traffic volumes = 2 percent

7. Operation workforce day shift equals 200 employees.

N$ c1 10 e 3 a W = CD >< w

Ar.end. X Dec. 1981 3.0 ANALYSIS OF EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES 3.1 OVERVIEW O Project-related revenues to local governm .nts can be derived from five basic sources:

1. Financial assistance payments by DOE pursuant to the Atomic Energy Community Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sec. 2301, g seq.)

2. In lieu of tax payments by TVA pursuant to the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 831, et seq. )

at such time as TVA may pay for and take permanent custody of the CRBRP and thereafter own and operate it as part of its power system. Such a transfer from DOE to TVA is not anticipated before 1995 at the earliest. 10

3. Sales or use taxes on materials, supplies and equipment acquired for use in coastructing the plant, but which do not become a cortponent of the plant itself or of the related distribution system;

4. Federal school impact id from P.L. 81-8'74. Appropriations for FY 1982 are currently under Congressional review, and the future of such payments is in question;

5. Direct and indirect taxes on or resulting from additional wages and salaries, business activities and private property values i attributable to employment and expenditures related to l

construction and operation of the plant l O C-50

Amend. X Dec. 1981 The revenues from types one through four outlined above cannot be estimated at this time. However, estimates of selected tax besefits of type five for each of the local government jurisdictions in the impact area are summarized in this chapter. It should be emphasized that these data do not represent an exhaustive list of revenues and should not, therefore, be considered a prediction of total fiscal impact. They do, however, provide insight into the relative magnitude of the CRBRP Project's influence on the local fiscal situation by emphasizing selected major revenues. Chapter 9 of the Atomic Energy Community Act of 1955 authorizes DOE to make annual assistance payments of just and reasonable sums to Roane County, Anderson County, and the City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, as payments for "special burdens" cast upon the three governments by DOE's activities there. The "special burdens" are the result of the Government's large tax-exempt land holdings which deprive the local 10 governments of tax revenue needed to maintain an adequate level of nunicipal and county services. Currently, the amount of annual pay-ments by DOE to the three localities is derived from a formula containing two variables: the number of DOE-related resident workers and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Employee figures for CRBRP are included in the total " resident workers" factor of the current financial assistance formula. Before September 30, 1984, DOE will determine whether the three governmental entities have become financially self-sufficient so -that the DOE assistance payments may cease or whether continuation of payments after September 30, 1984, is necessary. TVA makes payments to States and countiez served by TVA in-lieu-of-taxes on its power properties and operations as provided for by Section 13 of the TVA Act. The majority of these payments are based on a certain portion of revenues from the sale of power and go to each State. Most of the States, including Tennessee, redstribute portions of this revenue to local units of government. The smaller ;;.rt of C-51

Amend. X Dec. 1981 these in-lieu-of-tax payments are those which TVA pay directly to counties based on the former taxes paid on properties acquired for the power program. Given the lengthy time span until the anticipated TVA takeover of the CRBRP, the uncertainty of the magnitude of TVA power revenues at that time, and the current tax-exempt status (federally owned) of the site, no attempt was made to estimate potential in-lieu-of-tax payments by TVA. Materials, supplies and equipment which become part of the plant itself or of the related distribution system are not subject to sales or use taxes . However, those materials, supplies and equipment which are pur-chased by contractors for use in constructing the plant are subject to sales and use tax. Since it is very difficult to separate what the various contractors may be acqturmg into these two categories, this revenue source was also not included in this analysis. 10 The federal school impact aid from P.L. 81-874 was also not included in this analysis. This aid is allocated to school systems on a per student basis for pupils whose parents work on federal property. However, the future of these funds is somewhat uncertain since they depend upon legal implications related to congressional funding. Nonetheless, since the school children of all direct project related employment will qualify to whatever extent P.L. 81-874 funds continue, the school districts will receive a project related per student revenue. It should be noted that the preceding four project-related revenue sources were not included in the interest of conservatively approaching the fiscal analysis and avoiding any " pre-counting" of revenue sources. However, this approach is not meant in any way to suggest that these revenue sources will not be available to the jurisdictions in the impact area. O C-52

Amend. X Dec. 1981 The analysis in this section focuses on revenues selected from the fifth category, specifically property tax revenues, state educational funds, sales tax revenues and miscellaneous revenues such as beer and liquor tax, fines, fees, and charges. On the expenditure side, the analysis focuses on those local government expenditures which would be required to meet the incremental needs identified in the needs analysis in Section 2.0. These expenditures and revenues were analyzed for each of 10 jurisdic-tion s . Data applicable to costs and revenues for each jurisdiction were drawn from fiscal 1981 financial statements of each local jurisdiction. This analysis is limited solely to examining the impact of the additional socioeconomic needs of the local communities resulting from inmoving construction workers and dependents during the peak employment period of CRBRP construction. It is not applicable to existing DOE facilities in the area nor is it intended to provide a complete picture of the future 10 fiscal situation of each of the local jurisdictions. Rather it is only j intended to provide some perspective on the degree to which the CRBRP Project will influence the local fiscal situation in order to identify any potential major adverse fiscal impacts. 3.2 METHODOLOGY The methodology used in this analysis estimates project-related revenues selected from the fifth category of local revenues (section 3.1) and com-pares those revenues to additional expenditures that may be required to maintain existing service levels during the peak employment period for both the 26% and 40% mover rate scenarios. Potential revenues resulting from the projected peak population influx were estimated for each jurisdic-tion, except Knoxville, expected to receive inmovers. Knoxville was not included in the fiscal analysis because potential revenue from the small influx estimated during peak project employment is insignificant relative to the total revenues and expenditures of Knoxville. The basic assumptions, projected revenues, and pertinent costs are shown in Tables 3.1 through Tables 3.13. C-53

Amend. X Dec. 1931 Several factors are basic to understanding the methodology utilized in this analysis. The property tax base does not immediately realize prop-erty tax revenues due to a period of " assessment lag," the time required to get an addition to the property tax base on the property tax rolls and paying taxes. In all cases, this was assumed to be one year. Thus, although Tables 3.3 through 3.12 indicate projected revenue resulting from peak employment, that revenue would not actually be received until the year after peak. Given the small amount of projected expenditures, the substantial amounts of revenues, and the insignificant change in the the rates of growth for all communities, this lag should not create problems for communities. The needs analysis presented in Section 2.0 indicated no need for additional facilities requiring capital expenditures for any of the needs categories - law enforcement, fire, water, wastewater, solid waste, 10 education, health, and recreation. Therefore, expenditures from debt se. e funds were eliminated from consideration.(as was revenue to debt service funds). It should be noted that the omission of debt service revenues provides further conservatism to the analysis since project related property owners will pay debt service property taxes in the jurisdictior. where they exist. These revenues were excluded from the analysis because they cannot generally be used to offset increased jurisdictional operating expenses due to the project. Road and highway funds were also eliminated since any additional con-struction and maintenance of the existing major commuting routes is primarily paid for through state aid allocations. Any additional operating expenditures for water and wastewater would be met by additional user fees resulting in no net impact. Therefore, they were excluded from consideration in this analysis. O C-54

fcend. X Dec. 1981 The primary funds remaining for consideration in each jurisdictional budget were the General and School Funds (where applicable). The portion of the residential property tax base related to the peak number of inmovers in each jurisdiction is calculated by applying an estimate of property value per unit to each of the single family, mobile home and apartment units estimated in the needs analysis in Section 2.0 to be occupied by inmovers at peak employment. The residential assessment level is then applied to the sum of the residential market value of two of the housing types (single family units and mobile homes) while the commercial assessment level is applied to the market value of the apart-ments in the jurisdiction to obtain the total project-related assessed value. The current property tax rates (1981) for the jurisdiction's general fund are then applied to yield property tax re"enues from project-related residential units assuming current tax rates. Each County also levies a property tax for school purposes. The tax 10 rate is applied to the peak inmover related assessed value in the County. It is then distributed to the individual school systems in the County on v the basis of each system's share of the total average daily attendance ( A.D. A.) in the County. The share of this property tax for each system in 1981 is applied under the assumption that the local share will not change radically over the impact period. In addition, a few muni-cipalities levy a property tax for schools. Current state foundation and equalization fund revenues are divided by current A.D. A. to obtain a per A.D. A. estimate. The resulting figure is applied to the peak project-related pupil influx in each school system to obtain an estimate of revenue to the jurisdiction. This process assumes that the variables in the aid formula remain relatively the same for each school system in the future. O C-55

knend. X Dec. 1931 Other major revenues to the general and school funds such as sales taxes and beer and alcoholic beverage taxes, and fines, fees, and charges were selected from the current financial documents and divided by the current population to obtain a per capita revenue estimate. The resulting figures are applied to the peak population influx in the jurisdiction to obtain a revenue estimate. It should be noted tnat several sources of state and federal funds were excluded to provide conservatism to the analysis. Specifically, excluded were revenues from: vocational education funds textbook funds sek leave funds adult education funds other special designated school aid federal food funds 10 federal aid for disadvantaged students Several local sources of general fund and school fund revenues were also O not included to provide some conservatism in the analysis. Excluded were revenues from: licenses and permits parking meters use of property and money gross receipts and business tax Expenditures are calculated only for education-related needs since it is the only area of local government service that should need expansion to meet demands of the peak population influx. The average current O C-56

Amend. X Dec. 1981 expenditure per teacher is assigned to the projected number of teachers required to meet the demand during peak population influx to determine additional expenditures. These expenditures are then compared to the projected school revenues to , determine the revenue / expenditure balance as shown in Table 3.13. There were no necessary capital improvements identified for the impact area. As indicated in Table 3.13, the projected revenue increases resulting from the peak population influx are sufficient to accommodate the projected increased expenditures needed for additional teachers in each jurisdiction during the peak population influx. 3.3 RESULTS The results of the analysis of expenditures and revenues resulting from the CRBRP Project are summarized in Tables 3.1 through 3.13. All figures are in 1981 dollars. Tables 3.1 and 3.2 show the basic assump-tions used in projecting revenues. Tables 3.3 through 3.12 show pro- 10 jected revenues resulting from the peak population influx for both in-m mover rates. Table 3.13 compares the projected education revenues to the projected expenditures required to meet the demand for additional teachers during the peak population influx. This analysis indicates that construction of the CRBRP should have a positive fiscal impact on local governments in the four-county impact area. Although no expansion of local government services, except education, should be necessary, some expansion may be possible because of the increases in general fund revenues. In addition, there should be a sufficient amount of education revenue generated to accommodate the increased demand for teachers. C-57

                                                                               - - . ___4

trend. X TABLE 3.1 Dec. 1981 lf ASSUMPTIONS USED IN PROPERTY TAX REVENUE PROJECTIONS

Inmove r-Related Caneral Fund School Fund Locat_on Taxable Assessed Value** Tax Rate Tax Rate ***

Clinton $ 300,800 2.35 NA Oak Ridge $3,158,000 3.06 NA Lenoir City $ 456,000 2.75 .15 Kingston $1,128,500 1.75 NA Rockwood $ 250,700 2.72 NA Harriman $ 271,600 1.53 1.41 Anderson Co. $3,682,800 1.88 4.89 Knox Co. $8,218,000 1.20 1.43 10 Loudon Co. $ 996,700 1.54 4.40 Roane Co. $2,798,150 1.25 1.02 NA = Not Applicable

    *All tax rates are from FY 1981 i
   ** Derived from estimates of values for single-family homes, mobile homes, i      and apartments for each location according to the anticipated housing l      characteristics for inmovers during peak year of construction employment.

Sources of housing values include: (1) East Tennessee Development District Data on Value of Additions to Housing Stock, 1979; - (2) East Tennessee Development District Data from Courthouse records on l Value of New and Existing Housing Units, 1979; 1 (3) Information provided by area realtors. County estimates include housing projected to be within city boundaries. All estimates are in 1981 dollars. l

  *** County revenue generated by this tax rate is distributed among school systems in the county according to average daily attendance.

C-58

n b V TABLE 3.2 Amend. X Dec. 1981 ASSUtiPTIONS REGARDING NON-PROPERTY TAX . REVENUE PROJECTIONS

Per Capita Revenue Per Pupil Revenue Sales Beer & Alcoholic sines, Fees, State Foundation and Location Tax Beverage Tax Charges, etc. Equalization Funds Clinton $72.52 $7.00 $ 5.80 $585.00 -

i Oak Ridge 36.40 2.00 , 5.00' 629.00 Lenoir City 22.20 .50 15.50 498.00 's Kingston 39.20 9.60 1.00 NA

Rockwood 45.90 8.60 .e15.10 , NA 10 A Harriman 31.00 5.40 3.00 , 624.00 Anderson Co. NA __ 1.00 7.20 614.00 Knox Co. 28.00 .90 4.90 834.00 Loudon Co. 15.80 1.00 '13.90 610.00; Roane Co. 22.00 1.20 11.40 612.00 - 't

NA - Not Applicable - '

Based on FY 1981 Budgets for each jurisdiction

s s .

h, y \* ,%- _ a , 4,f 6 I* s

;   O C-59
                                                                                                                                                                                                              ~-z                              i

_ \' mee- y,S- - , --,..w,, ,-.,--....,-,----------.-+-,w ,, item-.-e,-- -- - - - - - - - - +-e . - - - - - - - , , , - , . - -,--e -, - - - - -- '-

Amend. X TABLE 3.3 SELECTED REVENUES FOR ANDERSON COUNTY FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX Migration Migration Condition A Condition B G_i;neral Fund Revenues Property Tax 43,000 69,300 , Sales Tex NA NA Beer and Altaholic CO 100 l-i, Beverage Tax 10 Fines, Fees, Charges 600 900 TOTAL $43,700 $70,300

Scho9L Fund Itevenues Property fax 63,700 102,800 Sales Tax NA NA State Funds 9,200 15,400 l TOTAL $72,900 $118,200 s NA = Not Applicable l- _e l l-C-60 f ew

Amend. X (j" g TABLE 3.4 Dec. 1981 SELELIED REVENUES FOR CLINTON FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX Migration Migration Condition A Condition B i

        !     General Fund Revenues Property Tax                             4,400          7,100 Sales Tax                                S,800          9,100 Beer and Alecholic                         600            900 Beverage Tax                                                          10 Fines, Fees, Charges                       500            700 TOTAL                                  $11,300       $17,800 School Fund Revenues Property Tax                            10,000        16,200
   -            Sales Tax                                   NA             NA State Funds                              8,800        14,600 TOTAL                                  $18,800       $30,800 NA = Nit Applicable O

C-61

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 3.5 SELECTED REVENUES FOR OAK RIDGE FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX Migration Migration Condition A Condition B General Fund Revenues Property Tax 59,900 96,600 Sales Tax 17,500 27,600 Beer and Alcoholic 1,000 1,500 10 Beverage Tax Fines, Fees, Charges 2,400 3,800 TOTAL $80,800 $129,500 School Fund Revenues Property Tax 38,000 61,300 Sales Tax 900 1,500 State Funds 62,900 94,400 TOTAL $101,800 $157,200 C-62

! i l Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 3.6 i I i SELECTED REVENUEE FOR KNOX COUNTY FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX i 2 Higration Migration Condition A Condition B i i General Fund Revenues i

Property Tax 61,100 98,600 Sales Tax NA NA Beer and Alcoholic 1,200 1,800 Beverage Tax 10 Fines, Fees, Charges 6,300 9,900 .

l TOTAL $68,600 .$110,300 4 School Fund Revenues 58,800 Property Tax 36,500 Sales Tax 36,100 56,600 State Funds 200,200 316,900 ! . TOTAL $272,800 $432,300 NA = Not Applicable , i l i 4 , i [ 1 i 2 i c-63 4

l l l L w e - - .--. w _ - - '_ . . - . - .,i,--,---..-.---~w,-m--

l Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 3.7 SELECTED REVENUES FOR LOUDON COUNTY FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX Migration Migration Condition A Condition B General Fund Revenues Property Tax 9,500 l'~300 Sales Tax NA NA Beer and Alcoholic 200 300 Beverage Tax Fines, Fees, Charges 2,200 3,500 10 TOTAL $11,900 $19,100 Sch,o1 Fund Revenues P.operty Tax 17,900 28,900 Sales Tax 2,500 4,000 State Funds 24,400 36,600 TOTAL $44,800 $69,500 NA = Not Applicable l O C-64

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 3.8 () SELECTED REVENUES FOR LEN0IR CITY FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX 4 Migration Migration Condition A Condition B General Fund Revenues Property Tax 7,800 12,500 Sales Tax 3,600 5,500 Beer and Alcoholic 80 100 Beverage Tax Fines, Fees, Charges 2,500 3,900 TOTAL $14,000 $22,000 10 School Fund Revenues Property Tax 9,700 15,600 g Sales Tax 1,200 1,900

   /   State Funds                       10,000               19,900 TOTAL                            $20,900             $37,400 l

O C-65 l

Amend. X Dec. 1931 TABLE 3.9 SELECTED REVENUES FOR ROANE COUNTY FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX Migration Migration Condition A Coadition B General Fund Revenues Property Tax 21,700 35,000 Sales Tax PA NA Beer and Alcoholic 500 700 Beverage Tax Fines, Fees, Charges 4,600 7,200 TOTAL $26,800 $42,900 10 School Fund Revenues i

Property Tax 13,300 21,400 Sales Tax 8,800 13,900 State Funds 79,600 122,400 f

TOTAL $101,700 $157,700 NA = Not Applicable l O C-66

Amend. X Ih TABLE 3.10 Dec. 1981 SELECTED REVENUES FOR KINGSTON FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX Migration Migration Condition A Condition B General Fund Revenues Property Tax 12,200 19,700 Sales Tax 9,400 14,900 Beer and Alcoholic 2,300 3,600 Beverage Tax Fines, Fees, Charges 200 300 10 TOTAL $24,100 $38,500 School Fund Revenues Property Tax NA NA Sales Tax NA NA O State Funds NA NA TOTAL - - NA = Not Applicable t l l O C-67

Amend. X Dec. 1981 TABLE 3.11 SELECTED REVENUES FOR ROCKWOOD FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX Migration Migration Condition A Condition B General Fund Revenues Property Tax 4,200 6,800 Sales Tax 3,700 5,700 Beer and Alcoholic 700 1,100 Beverage Tax Fines, Fees, Charges 1,200 1,900 10 TOTAL $9,800 $15,500 School Fund Revenues Property Tax NA NA Sales Tax NA NA State Funds NA NA TOTAL - - NA = Not Applicable I t l l l C-68 O l l

Amend. X O TABLE 3.12. Dec. 1981 SELECTED REVENUES FOR HARRIMAN FROM PEAK POPULATION INFLUX Migration Migration Condition A Condition B General Fund Revenues Prop'erty Tax 2,500 4,100 Sales Tax 2,500 6,900 Beer and Alcoholic 400 600 Beverage Tax 10 Fines, Fees, Charges 200 400 TOTAL $5,600 $12,000 School Fund Revenues Property Tax 6,800 10,900 Sales Tax 4,300 6,800 O State Funds 18,700 31,200 TOTAL $29,800 $48,900 t O C-69

TABLE 3.13 Expenditures and Revenues for Education Related to Peak Population Influx thundreds of dollars) Migration Condition A Migration Condition B Peak Year Peak Year School Number of Peak Year Peak Year Revenue-Cost Number of Peak Year Peak Year Revenue-Cost System Cost / teacher

Teachers needed** Cost Revenues Balance Teachers needed&* Cost Revenues Balance Clinton 18,500 0 0 18,800 18,800 1 18,500 30,800 12,300 g) Cak Ridge 19,900 2 39,800 101,800 62,000 4 79,600 157,200 77,600 1

}j Harriman 14,000 0 0 29,800 29,80^ 2 28,000 48,900 20,900 10 Lenoir City 16,000 0 0 20,900 20,900 1 16,000 37,400 21,400 Anderson Co. 12,200 0 0 72,900 72,900 0 0 118,200 118,200 Knox Co. 16,600 8 132,800 272,800 140,000 12 199,200 432,300 233,100 Ecudon Co. 14,900 1 14,900 44,800 29,900 2 29,800 69,500 39,700 Rcane Co. 13,600 4 54,400 101,700 47,300 5 68,000 157,700 89,700

Based on FY 1981 financial documents.

   ** Based on needs analysis in Chapter 2.

Note: All figures are in 1981 dollars E b,$ c,?c

3 C

wa . L MD G3 >< ka

  @                                                                     O                                                                       O

fS Amend. X V) i Dec. 1981 APPENDIX C REFERENCES

1. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Development, Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring And Mitigation Report, May 31. 1980, Knoxville, Tennessee, January 1981.

2. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Development, Hartsville Nuclear Plants Socioeconomic Monitoring And Mitigation Report. March 31, 1979, Knoxville, Tennessee, October 1979.

3. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Development, Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring And Mitigetion Report , December 30, 1979, Knoxville, Tennessee, October 1980.

4. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Services, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Construction Emplovee Survey, September 1978, Knoxville, Tennessee, September 1980. '

5. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Navigation Development and Regional Studies, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Construction Employee 10 Survey, October 1977, Knoxville, Tennessee, September 1978.

p 6. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Services, Results Q of May 1978 Survey of Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Construction Employees, Knoxville, Tennessee, October 1980.

7. Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Community Development, Labor Force Development Branch, phone survey, September 1981.

8. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Bureau of Health Manpower, Summary of Criteria for Designation of Health Manpower Shortage Areas (Washington, D.C. , November 1977), pp 2-4.

O C-71 U

O AMENDMENT X Additional Information for Detailed Environmental Assessment of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor 9 (CRBRP) Site e

i i

O

i Amendment X Revisions Resditing from Design Changes and i Additional or Updated Infomation and Minor 1, Corrections I

j Section Major Reason for Revision 1 2.2 Updated to reflect recent infomation ! 3.5 Updated to reflect revised radwaste i system design i. 8 Updated to reflect recent infomation i Appendix C Updated to reflect recent information j r l ) i l l i i i ! l l f ! AX-1 ,

  .. - - - -              -. . . - - - - - . . - - - - _ - - - - . - - - . - _ _ - . - . - - -                                                      . . .}}

ML20038C689

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

1.3 REFERENCES

1.4 REFERENCES

2.2 REFERENCES

6.1 REFERENCES

6.2 REFERENCES

8.1 REFERENCES

8.2 REFERENCES

8.3 REFERENCES

9.1 REFERENCES

9.2 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

Search