ML20037D689

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That IE Info Notice 81-25, Open Equalizing Valve of Differential Pressure Transmitter Causes Reactor Scram & Loss of Redundant Safety Signals, Was Sent to Listed Licensees on 810824
ML20037D689
Person / Time
Site: Monticello, Dresden, Davis Besse, Palisades, Perry, Fermi, Kewaunee, Point Beach, Byron, Braidwood, Prairie Island, Callaway, Duane Arnold, Clinton, Cook, Quad Cities, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Zion, Midland, LaSalle, Zimmer, Bailly, Marble Hill  
Issue date: 08/25/1981
From: Carroll D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Wright G
ILLINOIS, STATE OF
References
NUDOCS 8108280270
Download: ML20037D689 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._

AUG 2 5 B81 CD 'I @

o 6hk)

~

S Z AUG 2 719815 +

Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety

(

l ATTN:

Mr. Gary N. Wright, Manager v

Nuclear Facility Safety N

s 1035 Outer Park Drive, 5th Floor Springfield, IL 62704 Gentlemen:

The enclosed IE Information Notice No. 81-25 titled "Open Equalizing Valve of Differential Pressure Transmitter Causes Reactor Scram and Loss of Redundant Safety Signals" was sent to the licensees listed below on August 24, 1981:

American Electric Power Service Corporation Indiana and Michigan Power Company D. C. Cook 1, 2 (50-315, 50-316)

Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Zimmer (50-358)

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Perry 1, 2 (50-440, 50-441)

Commonwealth Edison Company Braidwood 1, 2 (50-456, 50-457)

Byron 1, 2 (50-454, 50-455)

Dresden 1, 2, 3 (50-10, 50-237, 50-249)

LaSalle 1, 2 (50-373, 50-374)

Quad-Cities 1, 2 (50-254, 50-265)

Zion 1, 2 (50-295, 50-304)

Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point (50-155)

Midland I, 2 (50-329, 50-330)

Palisades (50-255)

Dairyland Power Cooperative LACBWR (50-409)

Detroit Edison Company Fermi 2 (50-341)

Illinois Power Company Clinton 1, 2 (50-461, 50-462) lb oss 5s

)

8108200270 810825 PDR ORG ESGILPH PDR

Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety Iowa Electric Light and Power Company Duane Arnold (50-331)

Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly (50-367)

Northern States Power Company Monticello (50-263)

Prairie Island 1, 2 (50-282, 50-306)

Public Service of Indiana Marble Hill 1, 2 (50-546, 50-547)

Toledo Edison Company Davis-Besse 1 (50-346)

Union Electric Company Callaway 1, 2 (50-483, 50-486)

Wisconsin Electric Power Company Point Beach 1, 2 (50-266, 50-301)

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Kewaunee (50-305)

Sincerely, thy E. Carroll, Chief Word Processing and Document Control Section

Enclosure:

IE Information Notice No. 81-25 cc w/ encl:

D. W. Kane, Sargent & Lundy Resident Inspectors, RIII J. G. Keppler, RIII Division Directors, RIII P. R. Wohld, RIII i

I i

RIII j

/*

O roll /np d 24/81 f

i

. _.... _....,,..., _. _..,, _,. _ _... -. _. -,. _, _, _ _ _.,.. _ _, _,., _,. _... _ _... _. -,,, ~

5 SINS No.:

6835 Accession No.:

8103300410 IN 81-25 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D. C.

20555 August 24, 1981 IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 81-25:

OPEN EQUALIZING VALVE OF DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER CAUSES REACTOR SCRAM AND LOSS OF REDUNDANT SAFETY SIGNALS Descripth o of Circumstances:

On March 13, 1981, the Tennessee Valley Authority reported to the NRC that a scram occurred at the Browns Ferry Unit 2 facility as a result of an open equalizing valve used with the lower wide range Yarway water level transmitter.

Equalizing valves, which are closed during normal plant operation, are used to conduct instrument calibrations and to prevent over-ranging the transmitter during instrument isolation valve manipulations. With the plant operating at normal full recirculation flow conditions, there is no clear indication that this equalizing valve is open.

However, once recirculation flow is decreased, the reference leg will drain, causing erroneous delta pressure (dp) input signals to other transmitters connected to the same reference water column.

This affects a large number of safety and control systems that use water level as an input.

A review of the event showed that under reduced flow conditions the false high water level signals led to loss of redundancy in the logic for initiating safety functions, as well as initiation of a turbine trip which caused the reactor to scram.

Safety system dp transmitters that could be affected by the drained reference leg provided water level input signals to the logic circuits for the following functions:

primary containment isolation, low water level scram protection, automatic depressurization system confirm'atory low water level, and high water level trip signal for high pressure coolant injection and reactor core isolation cooling.

In addition, a large number of control functions can be affected, either directly or indirectly, by the drained reference leg.

Under normal operating conditions with full recirculation flow, the operator would be unaware of the abnormal position of the equalizing valve because the lower wide-range Yarway transmitter, which was bypassed by the open equalizing valve and the affected safety system transmitters, would continue to provide signals to the control room instrumentation that appear normal.

The lower wide-range Yarway transmitter is designed to provide accurate water level signals only for accident conditions when there is no jet pump flow.

With full recirculation flow, this transmitter reads full scale (high water level) whether or not the equalizer valve is open because the variable leg is connected near the high pressure outlet section of the jet pump.

Under these conditions, the common reference leg for the safety system dp transmitters identified above will not drain.

Therefore, even if the equalizing valve is open, these transmitters also provide normal signals when there is full recirculation flow.

i

IN 81-25 August 24, 1981 Page 2 of 2 i

During the event at Browns Ferry Unit 2 on March 13, 1981, the abnormal condition became apparent to the operator when the recirculation flow rate was being reduced as part of a planned reactor shutdown.

Reactor power had been reduced from 100%

to 54% over the previous 45 minutes.

As the recirculation flow was reduced, the pressure across the jet pump diffuser changed so that at lower flow rates the driving force across the equalizing valve reversed, causing the reference leg to have a higher relative pressure.

Higher pressure on the reference leg, coupled with an open equalizing valve, caused the water in the reference leg to drain into the variable Tag water column.

This caused all level transmitters connected to the affected reference leg to indicate higher-than-actual water level.

The

.. false indication of high water level caused the feedwater control valve to close and caused a turbine trip.

The turbine trip caused the reactor to scram.

It is unknown when the lower wide range transmitter equalizing valve was opened.

t However, thirty-six hours prior to the scram, a surveillance test was performed on the unit.

1 Similiar problems have occurred previously and, in July 1980, the nuclear steam system supplier (NSSS) prepared an information letter that delineates similar safety concerns with respect to the control of differential pressure transmitter equalizing valves.

This information letter provides recommendations to alleviate the chronic problem of open equalizing valves.

An extract of the NSSS recommended actions is attached for information.

This information notice is provided as notification of a possible significant matter.

It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities.

No specific action or response to this information is required at this time.

If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact the Director of the tppropriate NRC Regional Office.

Attachments:

1.

Extract from NSSS Information Letter 2.

Recently issued IE Information Notices i

i

, ~, _

August 24, 1981 IN 81-25 EXTRACT FROM NSSS INFORMATION LETTER The NSSS recommends that licensees consider for implememuon the following various means for controlling critical dp sensor instrun,antation equalizing valves:

1.

Installed dp instrumentation equalizing valves may be removed and the low and high side pipe stubs capped (see note below).

Such removal will prevent equalizing valving errors and also prevent sensor errors due to installed, leaky equalizing valves.

This is, however, not feasible where valve block assemblies are in use.

2.

Installed dp instrumentation equalizing valves may be closed in a positive manner by permanently locking the valves in the closed position or by closing the valves and removing the valve wheels and extended portions of the valve stems, etc.

NOTE:

For Items 1 and 2 above any function of the equalizing valves can be performed by equalizing valves mounted on calibration systems or devices which are disconnected for normal operation.

3.

Root, vent, drain and equalizing valve handles may be painted different colors, and the color included in calibration and line up verification checks.

4.

After normal checklists are complete, an independent supervisory check may be performed and then valves may be wire and lead sealed in position.

5.

Procedures may include a supervisory comparison of the dp instrument reading taken just prior to surveillance testing / calibration and just after signoff and channel restoration.

The final reading should only differ from the initial reading due'to calibration or a change in plant operating conditions.

6.

A periodic check may be made of dp instrumentation to detect warm instru-ment lines (for instruments connected to systems at high temperatures).

A warm instrument line would indicate significant leakage or an open equalizing valve.

Attachment i

IN 81-25 August 24, 1981 4

RECENTLY ISSUED IE INFORMATION NOTICES Information Date of Notice No.

Subject Issue Issued to 81-24 Auxiliary Feed Pump 8/5/81 All power reactor Turbine Bearing Failures facilities with an OL or CP 81-23 Fuel Assembly Damaged 8/4/81 All power reactor 3

due to Improper Positioning facilities with an of Handling Equipment OL or CP 81-22 Section 235 and 236 7/31/81 All power research Amendments to the reactor, fuel Atomic Energy Act fabrication and of 1954 reprocessing, and spent fuel storage licensees and

^

applicants 81-21 Potential loss of Direct 7/21/81 All p:ser reactor Access to Ultimate Heat Sink facilities with an OL or CP 4

81-20 Test Failures of Electrical 7/13/81 All power reactor i

Penetration Assemblies facilities with an OL or CP 81-19 Lost Parts in Primary 7/6/81 All power reactor Coolant System facilities with an OL or CP 81-18 Excessive Radiation 6/23/81 Specified licensees Exposures to the Fingers of holding byproduct Three Individuals Incurred licenses During Cleaning and Wipe Testing of Radioactivo Sealed Sources at a Sealed-Source Manufacturing Facility 81-16 Control Rod Drive System 4/23/81 All BWR facilities i

Malfunctions with an OL or CP 1

OL = Operating Licenses CP = Construction Permits

. ~

_..., _