ML20024F552
| ML20024F552 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 06/07/1983 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024F518 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-83-13, 50-364-83-11, NUDOCS 8309090469 | |
| Download: ML20024F552 (2) | |
Text
__
a APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Alabama Power Company Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 Farley License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8 As a result of the inspection conducted on April 25 - 29 and May 2 - 6, 1983, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9,1982), the following violations were identified.
A.
10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion V and the accepted Quality Assurance Program (FSAR Chapter 17) require activities affecting quality to be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
Contrary to the above, documented procedures implementing the licensed operator requalification program do not contain appropriate measures for determining that important activities have been satisf actorily accomplished in that:
1.
Section C.2 of Enclosure 1 to the March 28, 1980, letter from the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation specifies acceptance criteria for requiring a licensed individual to participate in an accelerated requalification training. Although Farley Nuclear Station is conforming to these requirements, they are not prescribed in documented instructions.
2.
Section C.3 of Enclosure 1 to the March 28, 1980, letter discussed above identifies reactivity control manipulations that are required to be incorporated into a licensee's requalification program. Measures have not been incorporated into the requalification program to assure that these requirements are met. As a result, one required manipulation has not been performed by variour licensed personnel as described in Violation B.
3.
10 CFR 55 Appendix A, Section 3.d, requires each licensed operator
. review the contents of all abnormal and emergency prncedures on a regularly scheduled basis. Measures have not been estab?ished to assure that these requirements are performed.
In additior, the frequency for accomplishing this requirement has not been established.
8309090469 830901 PDR ADOCK 05000348 G
2 Results Of the 17 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in 15 areas; 3 apparent violations were found in 2 areas (Failure to provide quantita-tive or qualitative acceptance criteria for licensed operator requalification, Paragraph 8.a; Failure to receive all reactivity manipulation training and failure to properly grade licensed operator requalification examinations, Paragraph 8.b and 8.c; and Failure to issue audits within Technical Specification time limits, Paragraph 6 a).
t L
9 I
i, l
,,.., _. _.... _.. -.,.. - - _ _.. -, _ - _ _ _. -.