ML20015A357

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Attachment - NRC-2020-000076 - Appeal Response to NRC-2019-000132. (Part 7 of 29)
ML20015A357
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/08/2020
From:
NRC/OCIO
To:
Shared Package
ML20015A350 List:
References
FOIA, NRC-2019-00132, NRC-2020-000076
Download: ML20015A357 (29)
v • d • e


Text

I It f ,

INTERNATIONAI URANIUM (USA)

I CORPORATION I White Mesa Mill*- Rock '>urability Test Results Update To Reclamation Cost Estimate I So, Material License SU A - 1358 I Docket No. 40

  • 8681 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I I 1---------------------------------------------- November 24, 1998 JU13mil I

Dlllt.1 I

t c* V'TV"ffl I '

\ I

INTERNATIONAL IJ ,( I UHANllJM

(;<>HPOHATH >N (USA) lndt*t1t'111lt*m*t* Plaza, Suitt' 050

  • 111 50 .~cvt*ntt*1*11th Stn*t*t
  • l>t*11wr, CO 8026.5 * :lo:J fi:2,"i 779k \ 111ai11 I * . m:i :JkH 41 :2."i I fa.-.. 1 November 24, 1998
  • I I Yu.\.flillERAL EXPRESS QYERISIGHT MAIL Mr. Jost.!ph J. Holonich I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Uranium Recovery Branch Office of Nuclear Materials Safoty & Safeguards I Mail Stop T7 J9 Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Ile: While Mesa MIii - RocA Durability Test Results I Update to Reclamation Cost Estimate
  • 1

Dear Mr. Holonich:

Attached for your infonnation and review are the results from the follow~up rock sampling and

I testing program as detailed in our letter of October 23, I998. This program was in response to the less than satisfactory results obtained in our earlier program to assess the on-site sandstone material.

We have now located three sites within 15 miles of the White Mesa Mill, which all exhibit rock I characteristics suitable for the riprap and armor material required for final reclamation. AJI three of the sources score above 50% on the NRC Scoring Criteria, and one of the sources scores over 80%

of the Maximum Possible Score. A description of the source locations, sampling procedure and

I preparation, laboratory test results and NRC Scoring calculations is included as Attachment 1 to this submittal.
I For purposes of revision to the current reclamation cost estimate, IUSA assumed the rock would come from the North Pit, located approximately one ( l) mile northeast of Blanding, Utah, and seven

{7) miles from the White Mesa Mill site. Utilization of this source of rock results in a reduction in I the total cost ofriprap and armor material by $2.80 per yd 1. The 1996 Reclamation Cost Estimate (submitted to the NRC in February of 1997) assumed a total cost of$5.19 per yd\ with total volume of 152.000 yd3. This total included a 25% oversizing factor due to the quality of the rock being less 1

than 80% on the NRC Scoring Criteria. The North Pit rock has a delivered cost of $2. 31 per yd"

  • In addition. the Nnrt.n Pit rock requires only a 9.35% oversizing factor.. although we have conservatively u::)umed a 1.5% factor for the revised cost estimate. The total revised quantity of rock required is 139 .JOO yd3. Additional placement costs have been assumed equal for all sm.m.:e!>. *rhe total reducti(1n in cost of the rock for the complete reclamation of the site is $466,635.

,, Mr, Joseph J. Holonich November 24, I998 Page 2 I

As a part of reviewing the cost of obtaining and placing the riprap material from the off-site source, I we also have taken the opportunity to update the equipment and labor rates used in the cost estimate calculations. In addition, we have revised the cover design to exdude the one-foot thkk clay layer on the side slopes of the reclaimed area.

I The labor rates utilized in the P'clamation cost estimatt* were taken from the Davis-Bacon rates I published for the southern Utah region. These arc the same labor rates utilized for the ongoing work on the lJ.S. Department of Energy. Monticello Remedial Action Project. The 1998 published rates were compared against the rates used in the 1996 cost estimate and were determined to he essentially I the same. A comparison of the 1996 versus the 1998 Davis-Bacon labor rates is included as Attachment 2. Only minor adjustments were made in the labor cost component itlr the 1998 estimate.

I Equipment rental rates were updatt.J hy obtaining revised quotes from Butkr Machinery Company.

The revised quotes were obt£1.ined for rental periods which more closely match the anticipated pn~jcct I schedule. The rental and operating costs were rt*"ised act:ording to Attachment 3 to thi submittal.

The, .isc *1tes vary from a decrease of$2.4, 1 per hour to an increase of $18.14 per hour. The effect of th : rate changes is summarized in the data included in Attachment 4.

I The reclamation cover design has been modi tied to ex<.: 1udc the use of the one foot thi".k day layer on the side slopes of the reclaimed area. The clay layer is designed to reduce radon cmmination from

  • 1 the stored tailing sands and therefore serves no purpose over the side slopes of the reclaimed area.

The effect of this modification is to reduce the required volume of compacted clay hy 28,410 yd'.

The volume is replaced by a like amount of random till. for a rc<ludion in material and placement I costs from $7.98/yd 1 for the clay t.o $0.4.3/yd 1 for the random fill. The overall reduction in cost is

$7.55/yd 1 ($214,500). The design modification is detailed on the attached revisions ( Attachment 5) to Figures A-5.1-1, A-5.1-2 and ,'\-5.1-3.

I The specific revisions for each task included in the Reclamation ( 'ost l*,stimutc is detailed in Attachment 6. The overall summary of the !'cvised 1998 Reclamation ( *ost I*:stimatc is included in I Attachment 7. The 1998 updated estimate,.., $10.445,505, which represents a n~duction of$585,455 from the original hase estimate, plus the further reductions in the associated allowances for I contractor profit. contingency, licensing and bonding, The calculation for the Lw1g-Tcrm ( 'arc I* und was also updated to the 1998 amount. The overall effect is a reduction of$ l ,024J55 from the I996 inflation adjusted estimate.

I If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me ut the letterhead phont; or address.

I Very truly you~> ,,

/{i~~'.

I M"/.

'/X'If.

7

. / L.k'.~

/.-} .

./'l:.~.*

I //

1larold R. Roberts Executive Vice President I HRR/pl

Mr. Josc:ph J. Uolonich November 24, 1998 Page 3 cc: Earl E. Hoellen Robert A. I lembrec David C Frydenlund William N. Deal Michelle R. Rehmann

!I I

I I

,I I

I ATTACHMENT

,I I 1 I

I I

I I

~,

I I

I

I I Io. 1larnlJ R R11hcrt~ cc. Willian1 ~ lkal FROM lfoht>rt A. HcmPret' I {),\IL I s: 'BJH' I Rod I l.'st Results Blanding Area ( ,ravel Pits I Attached you will tinJ the results for lab tests that were performed nn nH.:k samples ohtaincd from three gravd soun:cs around the White Mesa Mill. rhe~ samples were taken from the Cuv. Cany\)n I pit located just north of Bluff I l 5 miles south of the mill), the Brown ( *any on pit located on the i:ast side of Recapture ( *any on four miles northeast ot the mill. and the North Pit located one mile I northeast of Blanding. A 75 pound sample of material was collected from each site, cad1 samph:

was <.:rushed and sneencd to a t 1/2 I 1 1 inch si,.c. resting was performed by Western Colorado h:sting in Uran<l Junction. ( 'olorado. All samples \\ere tested ti>r spcxitic gravit), absorptilln. sulfah:.'

I .soundness and LA. ,\hrasion.

lest results imb:ate that all three sites :-.core high enough to he used as rip rap soun.:cs fur !ht:

I reclamation cm cr at the mill ( set: attached scoring calculations). [h~ Co\Ai ( *any on site scores high enough that there woul<l be no over-sizing required; it is suitablt.. for use in channels as well as llll side and top slopes. Jhe Brown Canyon site requires the most over-sizing ar nineteen percent I I9°,o 1.

I The North Pit material would re4uire ovcr-,sizing nf 9 , 5% I'hesc test results prmc that there arc Sl)urces uf rip rap material w1th111 a reasonable distarn.::e of the mill site. Ihc average ovcr-si11ng factor for the three sites 1s 9 5°'o, v.hich is wt:11 below t!u: 25% number used in the 1996 rcdamatHm I co*;t estimate The ovcr--s11ing ta(.;tor used in the l'itan Design Study was also ~ ) 010 Based on the rt*sults of the testing ll !(

  • could use any of these thn:e sites l'ht: North Pit 1,1,ould ht' I the mo:it reasonable 1.:hok:t~ ot material sites :,lnCC ic has a lower mcr-si1ing fador than the Bnmn Canyon site an<l is doser to the mill than the Cow' 'a, on site. f'he North Pit also has the aJrnrnagc I of being an i:stahlished puhlic pit on Al t\-1 adminisl,. ,.:d land.

I RAlhah I

I I

I

1
  • ti1t,ri1111tioitaruiinium ,u'.iiJeo;;p*. **

WHITE MISA MILL RECLAMATtON I NRC Rip Rap Scoring Calcutattona I We1ghlln9 Factors for Igneous Rocks Overs1z1n9 for side slopes. top slopes and well drained toes and aorons Rock Scoring less than 50% 1s re1ected, rock scoring over 80% does not require overswng I QQw CtOYGO .PJ1111Juff}

Lab rest

....-- Lab Results Score Weight Score x Weight Max Score I Specific Gravity Absorption. %

263 0 47 75 8 25 9

2 67 5 16 5 90 20 I Sodium Sulfate Sound %

L A Abrasion. %

02 64 10 75 11 110 75 110 10 I Totals 201 5 230 I Overall Score I a1iHf°10 Overs,zmg none  %

I ~

Lab Test Lab Results Score We12ht Score x Weight Max Score I Specific Gravity Absorption. 010 2 525 2 61 5.5 1 75 9

2 49 5 35 90 20 I Sodium Sulfate Sound %

L A Abrasion, %

55 10 3 75 4 75 11 82 5 4 75 110 10 I Totals 140 25 230 I Overall Score [ M~!J%

Oversizing 1902 %

I twtb..fllitL llapding)

Lab Tesl Lao Results Score We!_Sht _ Score We1aht Max Score X

I Specific Gravity Abaorpt1on %

2 557 2 84 6 25 I 25 9

2 56 25 25 90 20 I Sodium Sulfate Sound %

L A Abratton %

) 2 63 8 75 75 11 96 25 75 110 10 I Totala 162 5 230 I Overall Score [  !~!I%

Overs1z1ng 935 %

I I

I WESTERN iH .!', '/1 Ro..id 'l,,,te 3 ; t)'

Cr ,rnd Ju ncl H)r\ t ul.Jr 4dO l'I I i O 'i I COLORADO USTINO,

  • ~c.

,910J 241 noo

  • r"" i'l 701 24 1 na 1 I Hoveaber 16, 1991 WCT #111891 I

International Urani\111 USA Corporation I lnde........~ Plaaa 1010 17t.b ltrNt Denver, Colorado IOa65 I Attantionz Jlr. Bob Hallbr**

R*t*r*nce: Rock Durability Testing I

Aa requeatad, thr** (3) potential source* ot riprap tor uae in I raalaaation ot tailing* pond* in 8landin9, Utah were teated tor rook durability. The riprap aaterial vaa obtained, aruahed to I teatincJ aine, and deliveracl to weetarn Colorado Teating, Inc. by th* client. Th* three aourcee ot uterial were teated tor I epeoitio 9ravity and abllorption (.UTN Cl27), SocUua Sult ate loundne** (A&'l'II CII), and Lo* Angel** A.braaion (ASTM Ctll). The I reaulta ot the teetin9 are provided be!ov.

I I ..

Bulk specific Gravity, 9/co htMII 2.630 I IID apecifio Gravity, g/cc Apparent ~pttcitic Gravity, g/cc 2.642

a.663 Water Abaorption, I 0.47 I lodiUII Sulfate Soundn..e, Avg. I Lo** 0.2 L.A. Abraaion, I Lo** I 100 R*v* 6.4 I

I

I I

I **** 2 International uranlua USA corporation I WCl' 1111111 NovealNtr 16, 1118 I i. :

I llll Bulk lpeaific Gravity, 9/cc 11u1\

2.460 I IID apacific Gravity, 9/cc Apparent Specific Gravity, 9/c;c 2.525 2.629 Water A.baorption, I a.61 I lodiwa aultat* Soundn***, Av9. I Lo** 5.5 L.A. Al.traalon, I Lo** I 100 Rev. 10.l I

I INli uui, I Bulk lpeoitio Gravity, g/ec 2.485 SID lpeoifio Gravity, 9/CC 4i.!557 I Apparent lpecifio Gravity, 9/cc Water A>>eorptlon, I 2.11, 2.a, I Sodiwa Sulfate Sou.ncln**** Avg. I L.A. Abraaion, I Loa* I 100 Rev.

Lo** l,2 6.]

I If there are any queationa or it additional teatin9 i* needed, I pl**** feel rr** to contact our office.

I leapecttully 8\1.baitted:

- - COLCIIIIDO '18ftIINI, IIIG.

I I lyle Alpha I

conetruo,ion **rvic** Narwa9er I

~**,- .. *-~'"-- "*

I I

I

I I

I I

I ATTACHMENT I

I 2 I

I I

I I

I I

!I

I ,.. aoor f<ale ,;01r1parison v'/ttl f'E: MESA MIU RE Ci.AMA' IUN c:ns l RE /lf;v\t Atldch111enl 2 I Heavy Conltructlon L*bo, c1..1mcauon 19H Estlmatt Labor Ftatet' 1991 Ettimate Labor Aates** Difference

        • - Base Rate _, _____fr~_ ..... - Base Rate ........__.._Fnqge _________ Base Rate .......... Fnnae .......

I Boiler M.tkers Mtflwnghls

$18 48

$19 27 S7 89 S2 65

$1960

$19 83 SB 7f.

SJ 25

$1 12 so 56

$() 87

$060 I lronworkers Carpenters

$17 75

$10 81

$446 $19 92

$10 81

$6 66 $2 II

$0 00

$220 so 00 I Cement Masona Electnc1ans

$11 52

$14 52 $2 71

$11 52

$14 52 $2 11

$0 00

$0 00

$0 00

$0 00 lronworkers Re1nforc1ng $11 00 $11 00 so 00 so 00 I Laborers (including p1pelayers $7 65 11 60 $! 65 $1 60 $0 00 r) 00 Pipefltters i12 60 $12 60 $0 00 $0 00 I POWER EQUIPMENT OPERA TORS Backhoes $10 00 $10 00 $0 00 $0 00 I Cranes Oozers*,

$1() 43

$13 10

$10 43

$13 10

$0 00

$0 00 so 00

$0 00 I Graders

'oaders

$12 67

$11 26

$12 67

$11 26

$000

$0 00

$0 00

$0 00 I Scrapers+

Trackhoes

$10 00

$10 00

$10 00

$10 00

$0 00

$0 00

$0 00

$0 ()0 I r,actors TRUCK DRIVERS

$9 4,.

$9 42

$9 ~2

$9 42 so 00 so 00

$0 00

$0 00 I Noc.; '4 "'t" do not Include FICA, work*r comp, un*mployment, or company ban

  • General Dec1s1on UT940009
  • Mod1ficat1on 2 9109194 11a which lncrea** the coat per hour by 30%

I ,. General Dec1s1011 UT980009 Modificat1on O 2113198

+ Oper111tor Rate used in 1996 esltmate I ... Operator Rate used 1n 199.P ast,mate Rate for mechanic used 1n Hl96 estimate was $19 25 (loaoedl tt 't basis for this rate wH iJ c;iur, A rrnll rnechanic the las!< performed by 111:s labor clan 1n the mtll decom1ms1omng 1s actually equ1velent to Class B or C mechanu; who are paid at the r:1te of a $13 60 (loaded) There ,s no I

equivalent rate class under !he Heavy Construction General Dec1s1on for Utah I

I I

,1 r ....

t

.I I

I I

I

I I

I ATTACHMENT I

I 3 I

I I

I I

I I

I f.

TT-~~~-~, *. --~~~----* - - - tllllll - . . 11111 - - - - .... 1111 a 11111*

ATIACHMENT 3 V4HITE MESA Mill RECLAMATIOH COST HOURlY EOO&PIENT COSTS 1998 DOLLARS Aduai equipment rates quoted from Butter machinery 6 month rentaJ period Novenlber 3. 1998 RATE lffCE FUEL FUEL@ TOTAL Difference IIOtt>>ILY HOURLY EXflEl!IDMSl..£5 USAGE SO.Ii COST 1996 637E Scraper 21,200 120.45 2.05 24.0 20.64 143.14 ($2.402)

DIN Dozer 10,800 61.36 1.15 8.5 7.31 69.82 ($0.019) 07HDozer 9,100 51.70 0.95 7.0 6.02 58.67 ($0.891) 825C Compactor 9,600 54.55 1.10 14.0 12.04 67.69 ($0.981) 980 F Load.er 10,000 56.82 1 15 9.0 7.74 65.71 ($1.639) 988 F Loader 15.000 85.23 1.45 12.0 10.32 9700 ($2.446) 169C Haul Truck 9,200 52.27 1.50 9.0 7.74 61.51 ($0.288) 375 Excavator 19,600 111.36 1.90 14.0 12.04 125.30 $18.340 651 waer Wagon 10,000 56.82 1.80 18.0 15.48 74.10 ($1.656) 5000 gaJ Water Trude 5,700 32.39 0.75 10.0 8.60 41.74 $0.279 14G Matn&affler 7.700 43.75 1.05 5.5 4.73 49 53 ($0071) 16G~ 11,000 62.50 1.20 8.5 7.31 71.01 ($1 806)

fitiiNiii I

I I

lutler 1111 lutl* ...._ , ~,eay

  • 11011232-0033
  • FAX 17011291-lnl
  • 1351 Page Dr.
  • lb 9558
  • FtlQll ND M106 I NOVUDI& J, 19N IN'RJINATIONAL UIIANIUM CORPORATION I ATTN: IOBIDMBUI tOIO SIVINTUNTH ST. sum 950 Dl:NVD CO 18261 I DL\RIOI:

I TIIANX YOU l'OR 1111 INVITATION TO QUOTE INTlllNATIONAL URANIUM COUOIIATION (IRC) TU IQUIPMINT NEEDED l'OR TB&lll MINING PROBCT IN ILANDING, UfAIL 8UTLlll MACIUNUlY COMPANY (81JTLD) Ut&PUTl'ULLY I IUBMffl 01.Jll PROPOSAL ,OR A MAINTAINm fL&ET 01' CATUPll.LAR MACIIINU.

I LISTED ON ATIACRMINT A., YOU WIU l'IND 11D MODELS, QUAN'l'fl'l&S, MONTHLY RENTAL llATII, BOUU ALLOWED PEil MONTH, IXCUS HOV&

CILUCI, CU41Wff11D NUMBIR OF MON111.1 liTIS AU BASED UPON, TOTAL I rlOJGHT CHAllGU AND T'HI MAINTINANCE RATl PIil BOUll J'OR MATUIALS ONLY.

I ALL IIA1'11 SHOWN ON ATl'ACIIMINT A DO NOT INCLlJDE ANY STATE, LOCAL.

PROPERTY OR ANY Ol'BIR TAXIS THAT MAY 81 APPUCABLE.

I RATD AU IAIID tJfON ILICl1UC HOtJll MKTU UAJ>INGS WHICH AU A1TACH1D TO TID DAIR OJ L\CH MACBINL RATIS AU BASED ON 176 HOURS OF USE EACH MONTIL IXca& HOUR CBARGIS, IF Aln', WILL BE CALCULATED I AND INVOICD AT THI IND OF THI PROJICT. THEIi WOULD 8£ NO CRUD' 1111.JID ,OR ANY HOUU UNDlll TRI ALLOWID D1JIUNG THE TUM OF TRIS PROPOSAL. W DIC ILICII TO DOtJILI SBDT MACHINES, TUN Bt.rl'LD WOULD INVOICE TROii ROUU AT THI IND Of EACH MON11L (TO FIGUU nll DOUBLE I SHUT RATES, TAKE THI EXCISS HOVll RATI SHOWN ON ATIACHMINT A TIMES THE NUMBD OJ HOUIS).

I lL4'fEI 4U BASED UPON A MINIMUM GUARANTII Oil 6 MONTHS AND A

~

.I - - - ~ I liTll 18.tlllll LISTED ON A1TACIIMINT A INCLUDES TIii MAT&alA,L PUT ITIMS ONLY, StJCH Al AIR. OIL, AND l'USL flLnu.

I LIJIIUCANT ODA. GRIAII, 4NTl*fUIZI, M.TBIUJS. rA.N IILTI. LIGHTS AND MAU-UP OWi. IUTLU WOULD INVOICE JRC ACTUAL IIOlJU VIBD ON MACHINER 4T THI IND OF IACH MONTH.

I ti

fif1tf.:ft *ucff I SEf1 4.J UUJ I

I NOVEMBER l, 1'91 I PAGE2 OUR MONTBLY MAINTENANCE CHARGE WOULD BE S2t.SOO.OO, WHICH INCLUDES OUR LABOR. SPECIAI.IZED LUBI TRUCkS, SUPPORT VIHICLIS AND l!QUIPMINT, SPECIALIZED I TOOLING, SCIUDULID OIL SAMPLING, PARTS TRAILERS AND INVENTORIES, MILJ:AGE AND TRAVEL IXPINSE. BVTLD WILL PROVIDE TWO (2) JULL-TIME MAINTENANCE TICIINICIANS ON SITE nFTY (50) HOVJIS PER WEEK ON A SCHl!DULI! TO Bl DETERMINED, I MONDA\' THROUGH FRIDAY. IRC WOULD HAVI TO SCHEDULE THE MACHINES AVAIL.ABU: fOR A TIME nAMI 'iET TO 81 DETUMINlD ADEQUATE FOR BVTt,:ER

  • I MAINTENANCE PIRSONNIL TO PERJ'ORM TIIE IU!QlJIJl£D MAINTENANCE. BUTLER WOULD INVOICE IRC FOR 11IE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE CHARGE AT TH.I BEGINNING OF EACBMONTIL I BIPAIM; BtJTLIR WOULD Bl USPONSIBLE FOR ALL REPAIRS INCLUDING PARTS AND LABOR ON I OUR MACHINES OTHER THAN fAILURES CAUSED BY DAMAGf.S OR MJS..USE. REPAIRS INCLUDE IT.IMS AS MINOR AS STARTERS, ALTERNATORS. WATER PUMPS. HYDRAULIC ROSES. ETC. TO THE MAJOR ITEMS SUCH AS ENGINES, TRANSMJMIONS, DlfPl!UNTIALS.

I BRAKES, HVDBAUUC PUMPS AND CYLINDERS, ETC. Ir TIMI PIRMITS AND IRC UQUESTS BUTLER'S TECBNlClAN TO PERi'ORM REPAID OR MAINTENANCI ON THEIR MACBINIS, I OUR DOUBLY CHARGE WOULD 81 $47.00 PD HOUR PLUS MATIIUAU.

DJJGI([:

I l'REIGHT CHARGES INCLUDE BOTH DELIVERY AND UTIJRN, ASSEMBLY, AND DISASSIMBLY OJ' EQUIPMENT.

I w;*s BUPQNSIIIJ1CDU mJCLUQla QlU,~JQBI, PROVIDE TIii OPERATORS AS NEEDED TO OPIRATI MACHINES AS STATED I fN CATERPILLAR'S OPERATING GUIDE. BUTLER WILL PROVlllE, AT NO EXPINSI TO IRC, QUALIFIED 11\AINING INSTRUCTORS FOR TIIE PURPOSES OF TRAINING OPERATORS. THIS TRAINING WOULD TAK.I PLACE ON THI JODSffE AT nu:: 1Nfl1AL START UP Of THE JOB I AND WOULD INCLUDE CLASSROOM, WALK AROUND, AND IN IRON QEMONSTRATIONS.

'lllL, SUPPLY AND flLL ALL FUEL roa EQUIPMENT INCLUDING BUTLER'S SERVICE I VIHICL&S.

QAtJA~, THIS INCLUDU GLASS BREAKAGE, BENT 11.ANDRAJ.LS, STU LADDERS,

1 ,tNDt:~ &TC. IUU.IR'S NORMAL POLICY FOR UPAIJUNG DAMA.CU TO UNTAL MACHJNIS IS TO '4CPAIR THIM WHEN THI RENTAL PIRIOD IS COMPL&TED, HOWIVJll, IF THI DAMAGID ITIM IS or A SAR.TY CONCIJlN, WE WOUlJ) REPAIR nu: DAM.A.GU AS SOON AS POUIIILI AJTI& TUY OCCURUD. AN rnMJZID UST or TilE PARTS AND I t.AIOR UQUIUD WOULD IE PROVlDID TO IRC PRIOR TO ST.UTING TUE REPAIR, AND INVOICED AT CUIUllNT LIST PRICES PLUS FUIGIIT UPON COMPLETION.

!I I

I I NOVEMBU J, 1991 I PAGll I UJYDl8'AIIJ6Cil AND Dlf.S,; IRC WOULD Bl IWlPONSIBLI JOR ALL TIRE WEAR INCLVl)INC TIRI DAMAGES ON TIU: MACHINES WITH AN ASTaUSK LISTED ON ATIACBMENT A. EQUIPMENT WOULD 11AVI TO Bl UTIJRNID WITH I SA.Ml BRAND AND MODIL TIUS AS WHIN DILIVEUD, OR PRORATl!D ACCOIWINGLY BY PIRCINTAGI OP TIRE WI.AR AND CONDfflON AT TERMINATION Of RENTAL PDJOD.

I UPON DELIVERY OJ MACBINI& A lllPRUINTATIVE OJ IUTLU. A Ul'lll.SENTA'OVI OJ lllC AND A UPRESENTATIVE fROM AN INDEPINDINT I Ttm: DU.LIB OR MANUfACTlJllll WOULD JOINTLY VIIUl'Y IN WRITING THE CONDfflON, PERCENTAGI or WIAR, AND TDll VALUE. UPON TIRMINATION OF UNTAL, WI WOULD AGAIN BAVI THE REPRESENTATIVU MENTIONED ABOVE I DETIRMINI TH.I CONDITION, PERCENTAGE OJ WM.JI. AND TIii.i VALUES. ANY DURUNCES NORD, WOULD THIN 81 CHARGED OR CR.EDITED TO IJlC INCLUDING BOTH MATIRIALS AND LABOR.

I UNDIRCARlllAGI WEAR ON AU TRACK TYPE MACIIINES WOULD BE BU11..ER'S IXPINSI.

I QIQJ.LD UfiAriJN<, LL CU1TING IDGIS. RIPPER TIPS AND PROTICfORS, BUCKET TIPS AND ADAPTIIIS, EDGES BETWJ:IN ADAPTIRS. WEAR PLATIS ON BOTTOM OP BUCDTS AND ALL MOUNTING HARDWAU. 81.JTLIR WOULD I INSTALL THESE ITEMS ON AN AS NEIDID BASIS AT ffll CIJIUllNT CAffltPIU..All LIST PRICI PLUS l'UIGBT AT NO ADDmONAL lABOa COSTS.

,I ALL MACHINES WOULD Bl DILMRID WITH NEW G.E.T. ITEMS AND AU TO BE Rl11JRNED WITH NEW.

WE WISH TO rtlANK IRC AND YOU FOR GIVING US TIii OPPORTUNITY TO I PRESENT OUR PROPOSAL AND J'OR ALL TIU CONSmlRATION WE UCIIVE.

SINCERELY YOURS, I R'R ~?DNIRY COMPANY u~ \i'J. q'"",~-~,

OSCAR D. SWINION

.J UNTAL l'LUT MAllUTINC MANAGIR ODBldel cc: ,IOIL NJ.KL!, RENTA.L PLEET MANAGER I

--*------ ------ A.TT). fNPIT A 1VTfl&N6J'JONM.UMtllN <WPQl4DON BQUIPMliNT NB1EBD PO.ll.W. Di BLANDING.. UTAH NOVaiaEll J. , , .

MINIMUM GUMANTIE) TOTAL**

-e1£

an 4

MONTHLY

&MTAL MD S21,280EA HOURS ALLOWII)

EXCESS HOUR.

PBl MON'Ill w,.ar,p 116BA. 1'6EA.

NUMBBROF MON'l1fS RATE

.9A.tiihlJPON 6EA.

F1lHGHT CHMlGES TOAPIQM SIO,ltOEA.

MAINTENANCE llATE PaHOUll S2.0SEA.

n*um:rm ] 13.)00 116 42 6 1.600 1.40 DINltl'fll!Bl. I 10,.IOO 176 34 6 7.400 1.15 D?BltlPPl!ll I 9,100 176 21 6 6,400 .9S

&2SC I 9.600 176 lO 6 7.300 1.10 9&QF J 10,000 176 32 6 7,300 l. 15

...... 1 15,000 176 41 6 1,600 l.45

  • 169C 4 9,200EA. 176EA 21EA. 6EA. 7,400EA l.SOEA.

3iSL J 19,600 176 S6 6 lS,000 1.90 10,.0IOGALLON I )0,800 176 30 6 1,000 1.80 WATBt WAG())l 5,_,GAUON l 5,780 176 18 6 3,000 .15 WATBl WAGON l4Gtlll1Bl 1 7,700 176 24 6 5,600 1.05 l6Gltl'PPBl I 11,080 176 34 6 6,IOO 1.20

  • PU.JS T!ltE WEM. ~;!
  • ti< INCLUDES ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY c::-1 ci c;.'

I I

I I

I I

I I ATTACHMENT I

I 4 I

I

,, I I

I I

I

I

, ,\a I ** _., _.ca.. ~--*'*'""* _,

I Equipment Cott Adjustment By Task WHITE MESA MILL RECLAMATION COST REVIEW Attachment 4 I 1998 Cost Total Cost Equip Hrs AdJUStiHr AdJustment I Mill Decommiasloning Mtll Bwldmg Demolition I 769 fiUCkS 988 Loader 245 Excavator (now 375 EJ(cav l 640 160 160

($0 029)

($2 446)

$18 340

($18 43)

($391 36)

$2 934 40 I Ore Feed Demoltt1on 769 Trucks 64 ($0 029) ($1 84)

I 988 Loader 245 Excavator (now 375 Excav )

16 18

($2 446)

$18 340

($39 14)

$293 44 I SX Bu1ld1ng Demoht1on 769 Trucks 988 Loader 320 80

($0 029)

($2 446)

($9 22)

($195 68)

I 245 Excavator (now 375 Excav J CCD Circuit Removal 80 $18 340 $1 467 20 769 Trucks 120 ($0 029i ($3 46)

I 988 Loader 245 Excavator (now 375 Excav J 30 30

($2 446)

$18 340

($73 38)

$550 20 I Sample Plant Removal 769 Trucks J2 ($0 029) ($0 92) 988 Loader 8 ($2 446) ($195?)

I 245 Excavator (now 375 Excav ) 8 $18 340 $146 72 Boiler Demoht1on I 769 Trucks 988 Loader 245 Excavator (now 375 Excav )

160 40 40

($0 029)

($2 446)

$18 340

($4 61)

($97 84)

$733 60 I Vanadium Oxidation Circwt Removal 769 Trucks 64 ($0 029) l $1 84)

I 988 Loader 245 Excavator (now 375 Excav J 16 15

($2 446)

$18 340

($.39 14)

$293 44 I Mam Shop/Warehouse 769 Trucks 988 Loader 128 32

($0 029)

($2 446)

($3 69)

($78 27)

I Office Building 245 Excavator (now 375 Excav ) 32 $18 340 $586 88 769 Trucks 96 ($0 029) ($2 76}

I 986 Loader 245 Excavator (now 375 Excav) 24 24

($2 446)

$18 340

($58 70)

$440 16 I Pag.e 1 of 5

1

I Equtpment Coat Adjustment By Task WHlfE MESA MIU RECLAMATION COST REVIEW Attar:hment 4 I Equip Hrs 1998 Cost Adjust/Hr f otal Cost Adjustment Misc Tan,,age & Spare Parts I 769 Trucks 988 Loadtr 32 8

($0 029)

($2 446)

($0 92)

($19 51) 245 Excavator (now 375 E)(cav ) 8 $18 340 $146 72 I Mill Yard Decontarrnnatton 63 7 Scraper 257 1$2 402) ($61 i' J 1)

I 08N Dozer wmpper 65 1 Water Wagon 07 Dozer 65 65 65

($0 019) 1$1 656)

($0 891)

($1 24)

($107

($57 641 92)

I 14G Motor Grader 988 Loader 65 65

($0 071)

($2 446)

($4

($158 62) 99)

I Ore Storage Pad Decontaminatton 631 Scraper D8N Dnzer w/npper 189 48

($2 402)

($0 019)

($453

($0 98) 91)

I 651 Water Wagon 07 Dour 14G Motor Grader 48 48 48

($1 656)

($0 891)

($0 071)

($79

($42 49) 17)

($3 4 I)

I Equipment Storage Area 988 Loader 48 ($2 446) ($11741) 69 I

637 Scraper ($2 402) ($165 74)

DBN Dozer w/npper 17 ($0 019) ($0 32) 651 Water Wagon 17 ($1 656) \$28 15) 07 Dozer 17 ($0 891) ($15 15)

I 14G Motor Grader 988 Loader 17 17

($0

($2 071) 446)

($1 21)

($41 58)

I Revegatate Mill Yard & Ore Pad 637 Scraper D8N Ooier wtnpper 132 33

($2 402)

($0 019)

($317 06)

($0 63\

I D7 Dozer 14G Motor Grader 33 33

($0891)

($0 071)

($29 40)

($2 34)

I Wind Blown Contarninatron 637 Scraper 08N Dozer wtnpper 680 170

($2

($0 402) 019)

($'I 63J 36)

($3 23)

I 07 Dozer 14G Motor Grader 170 170 i $0

($0 891 l 071)

($H51 47)

,$1207)

I Total Equip. Diff, MUI Decommi11ionin9 [_~f~J Page 2 of 5

I Equipment Cost Adjustment By Task WHITE MESA MILL RECLAMATION COST REVIEW Attachment 4 I Equip Hrs 1998 Cost AdJUSt/Hr fatal Cost Adjustment I RHl1mat1on of c,u 2 Place Remainder of Bridging Lift I 637 Scraper 08N Dozer wtnpper 224 56

($2

($0 402) 019)

($538 05)

($1 06) 07 Dozer 56 ($0 891) ($49 90)

I 825 Compactor

'151 Waterwagon 14G Motor Grader 56 56 56

($0

($1

($0 981) 656) 071) 1$54

($92 94) 74) 1$3 98i I Place Lower Random Fill 637 Scraper 402 ($2 402) ($965 60)

I 08N Dozer wtnpper D7 Dozer 825 Compactor 100 100 100

($0

($0

($0 019) 891) 981)

($1 90)

\$89 10)

($98 10)

I 651 Wate; wagon 14G Motor Grader 100 100 1$ I

($0 656) 071 l

($165 60)

($7 101 I Clay Layer 63 7 Sc.raper 08N Dozer w/ripper R80 0 1.$2 402)

($0 019)

$0 00

($16 72)

I 07 Dozer 825 Compactor 651 Waterwagon 880 880 0 ($0 891)

($0 981)

($1 656)

$0 00

($863 28)

($145728) 14G Motor Grader 880 ($0 071) ($62 48)

I 980 Loader cost added left out of estimate 880 $65 710 $5782480 Upper Random Fill I 637 Scraper 08N Dozer w/npper 773 193

($2

($0 402) 019)

($1 856 75)

($3 67) 07 Dozer 193 ($0 891) ($17196)

I 825 Compactor 651 Waterwagon 14G Motor Grader 193 193 193

($0

($1

($0 981) 656) 071 l

($18933)

{$319 61)

($13 10)

I Rock Armour on Top 637 Scraper 235 ($2 402) ($564 41)

I 08N Dozer wtnpper 07 Dozer 825 Compactor 59 59 59

($0019)

($0 891)

($0 981)

($1 12)

($52 5 7)

\$57 88)

I 651 Waterwagon 14G Motor Grader 59 59

($1 656)

($0071)

($97 70)

($4 19)

[_ tlo,02,.o~J I Total Equip. Dlff. Reclaim Celt 2 I Page 3 of 5

1

l ~ n t Cott Adtuttm.nt ly Ta*k WMI f~ Mt.SA MtU. RECLAMAflON COST RIEVIEW I> tfatihmerH 4 1998 Cost Total Cost AdJUSt/Hr Ad1ustment l ower Fhandom F 111 6:37 Soaptl!r 95$ ($2 402) 1$2 296 31) 08N Doze,. wtnp,er 239 ($0 019) ($4 54) 07 0Gzer 239 ($0 891) ($21295) 825 Compactor 239 ($0 981) ($234 46) 651 Weterwagon 239 ($1 66tl) ($395 78) 140 Moto, Grader 239 ($0 071) ($16 97) 63 7 ScrlllJ)tr 777 ($2 402) ($1 866 35)

DIN C>oier wtnpper 195 ($0 019) ($3 71) 07 Dozer 196 ($0 891) ($173 75)

$25 Compactor 195 ($0981) ($191 30) 651 Waterwagon 195 ($1 688) ($322 92) t 40 Motor Grader 195 ($0 071) ($13 85) e37 Scraper 0 ($2 402) $0 00 D8N Dore, wlnpper 1022 ($0 019) ($19 42) 07 Ooar 0 ($0 891 l $000 321 Compacto,. 1022 {$0 981) ($1 002 58) i<<l 1 wattrwaoon 1022 ($1 656) ($1.892 43) 140 MQt~ Grar 10n ($0 0711 ($72 56) tenc t t>4idtr Left out of ongmaf estimate 1022 M5 710 $67 155 62 617 Scnaper 941 ($2 402} ($2 260 28)

D8N Dozar w/rJPPfir 236 (10 ()19) ($4 47) 07 Dozer 236 ($0 8it J ($209 39) 12,co~tor 236 ($0 981) (1230 54) ii 1 W*n*rw*n 2U ($1 ' " } 11319 16) t4:G Mok>t firldtlil 235 1$0 0711 (SH} 69) rte rn,,ei.:1 ilO 029) ($17 45)

Ml lQMlilf (f144') (1741 l4)

I Equipment Coit Adjuetment By Task WHITE MESA MILL RECLAMA TfON COST RfVIE-W Attachn1ent 4 I Equ,p Hrs 1996 Cost Ad/utUHr rota! Cost Adjustment I Crystal Removal D8N Dozer wlnpper 53-9 1:iiO 0191 ($10 24)

I D7 Dozer 825 Compactor 769 Trucks 539 539 2157

($0 891)

($0 981)

($0 029) 1$480 25) 1$528 16) 1$62 12i I 988 Loader 245 Excavator (now 375 Excav J 539 539

($2 446)

S18 340 1$1 31s :rn,

$9 685 26 I Contammatc,,1 Materials Removal 637 Scraper 08N Dozer w/npper 308 n

($2 402)

($0 OH})

($139 82) 1$1 461 I 651 Water Wagon 14G Motor Grader 77 n

($1 658)

($0 071 i

($12151i

($5 4?)

I Topso,I Apphcat1on 637 Scraper 08N Dozer W/rtpper 154

iS 1$2 402)

($0 019)

{$36991i 1$0 i4) 651 Water Wagon 39 ($1 656) ($64 58)

I 14G Motor Grader 39 ($0 071) 1$2 n,1 Construct Channelis I D8N Dozer wtnpper 6 ($0 019i iSO 11 Rock Protection I 07 Doler 66 I Water Wagon 15 15

($08911

($1 656) 1$13 3/ /

,$24 84; 14G Motor Crader 15 ($(! ()71 i ($1 01)

I 769 Trucks 988 loader

~8 15 1$0 029) 1,$2 446) 1$1 61)

($]f, 69; I Total Equip. Diff. Reci1m,uon C*H 1 I Mob/Otrnob Co$t 01ff@rence I

I ii

I

  • I I

I I

I

I ATTACHMENT I

.I I

I I

I

,1**.*.

\:

1

'I t: ,.

  • DOCUMENT PAGE(S) PULLED SEE APERTURE CARD FILES APilll"URE CARD/PAPER COPY AVAILAILE THIIDUGH NRC FllE' CENTER NUMIER Of OVE'RSllt PAt;I.$ FllMED ON APEIITUII." CA/ID/I/ -~ .
                        • ij*******~**********************~*******************************

ACCfSSION NUMll:RS Of OVERSllt l'AlilS.

~.tl!J le.Jo? }~7 * (J[_:: c~ ~~~

I I

I I

I I

I I ATTACHMENT

  • t 6 I
  • 'I

\,.**.*

~

1 ..*

I ','/Hi

~lf~i /*,1:1,~!nifj' f lfjt,1,1 ff* !,It* ,:,,A !,111 f,r ,' :. ,H,M : , it.1 Mlj; 1,.-,., ,t fl I

I Op*ratm 1. al'Jor MiKfl.tH(;,i!\ 1 abm Mt;tb,lt b:fuipttijtfil , 011

$,:op10f1 SoMty

  • 1 .. ,,,
  • 1\/,d ..

N.. rn ,

$111 1 lO

,$10 l ,01

$:i' 485 Nii*~

' , 1!

'~*lb, fi@A,;~ f',J;,,p,1191,1, iVl!i'Jtlr,*r h ~ *.J(lft ...

',fl ;iil.1' ij,,r ',; 111Ji1.1*

J.. ')IJ:h4tjf,Ji('f1;ii,1*

    • fA"H klli!tf ii"lff1-at;;Ji t1*11 1 1{f,;lJ'.t'f

.-i; ,r<t :~a'!lfl'!J

li!ff

)'"1.,,lOP*;rifJlt;',:*1

$:.> 500 I OiWOl,ttmllllt!OI\ \, (,l!t,1 Sa1111at111 l/alm1t ol E<1111f.)inent M,t1 ri.(:ornm1H1ontt11,1 "'-'

,,,,*~ 1 so

.JC '4!..i!i!l ~ M.,, hJf1,f l .ltfli~t!t

  • .),,( ,,, *n4trt' *ritt *,ttt! ti), ,1$

!*,,thf'ilt1 !#11/r -\ir,,\ilt "*~*~1tf!4(ttl

-;ft!lfc Jitfl..'i fqf

-l~s ."A1t,'i*d D-, 14 '1 1 t.*O' LIii ij Mt!tU*:rJPt 1~i.~,f\(.,,fl11*,r ll'"'

I Adll1*1mer11 (f~h !'iht

\Jot~ t 1

,~ ~ ,tll"f:t"flf *n1tt:hJ r l'f1J1iipmfn ihUtt 1./'t,1. ~

,,a,11t1t_1r ',lt,o1$.i *4t1:.*1,,.*-.c,!

h3fiqtl1 ,t,a Ut-la,i&,:J

.f; 1 ict

, 11 1 *.\Ht4t ,~mftl*t 4

!'~UII .! *<fflff/ 011t,;t.,,t**111, 1111 1tlt*"1 ,1, I Op**tf01 Liboi Mch,1* E.quipmenl <.,mat Olflitt~ Sida ~ t:11;1'1 RIKtlJi'.:e lltlf)Alfl r111,;i.nt*11 S'>l J5o noo:z*

il&9 000:

!114400)

I N,Ha 'l I ilt liih*!11-tj * * <A4P Pr0duct1on I'. inlt ""'" *Sl<IO 600) 4)folli1 ,., 1t11J thh'fHUf '.",1!a Mop*1i , }llij','.lllt,(j ritwJ 1-,'*!!I 1r1r:*w llRM AtJv11ty Oeducl Nol;, .,

inat ;,Jdnn ,,r.,P,.lij:)t*, ,14t11, tf"' 114* ,;u:,pes t-41 {3f r1*v.:i'\o\l r*tJ;:1 Ctl,l l Cl<>aur* Ntt Ao1ui11me111 -j1l(Y*'W'tl,'j i~"fff8 '#lfitt°'f)isl !hf l\Htd ;*1# H,e - fiJJ' llTiH I Oll'fti a1<,, 1. abm Mob1* f Ql.Kf;!tflttnl C<)tt ts ,,. ,

'ill tM~n

!Q()

l\1*!14 f"1

,,~,4t1f}1 1*r'@ftH'WJJ -rt

~y\l

, *.)'It "ff1ld1 t 1-*~*nq ~* ~ ifJt.:.J1T 11 ;$::;~

.1,t:<fif!I, fi;rl;Jt)l*

u)c~

,1 i ,):11iJ ***ufi.fi@!li 1f

  • 1t1:r:~:'!*** ,1t 111* .ll:1'h'1,'

lf~;.w: ii" ftt1II !(tdt1t.~~ 1f'Hlt JJli',)lir.1 *,f

,;.r, 'l:t'P'f I ~t S*

R ~ Aip~tf) f ntulmeu

!.\IIOJ)tl (:i1y ilt!J)"'fil f)1Qd1.1r.:1tq;,1 Cl'J1,l

~;,,,,, ,.

"'"'lll

$!4! 500) ill& 900) 1StOO 8001

~vu  :$1 jft,(r!!i '1Mhl$(1 ,f,f'JU\jl' H!4t IM H ii liocJr'1.t1 -J11trn:.n 'iff:>!-l1U'+lt$ ,}/lJ'r ~:rHt*,~\i,j: t1..: **Hlf!.e 1t1i 1--c'fal.;<h;d

,f:1';j1 ltM Aoviltv i~ut *,,Jt,;, *

-;; ~-i;,*{,,i'*ifitJn !f~ ,,~, 'y'I# .-,.414,r,3i :lau****o it<Ji,,.f?*nu,it I

,_1l 10, 11Jfl-1'>

Clfll :i ClllifoW(j Nlrti A,;ijt,\l.lm4m I ,'ljj ,;ti:\<} 1$'.il;S~tj t'f-0-l~Jt:tl!JL *4t1' !fti,,1f;J;ij r. i(H,vt,; :*J,l,(rt f

'-.,q{IJ;,t -~
;f'i.,.* '1,t,Hlftlt "'~" i.-..wt* .!*,it )t *'"'* *!tl!Un;lfff j,fL 4' h)t. .i.tlruJ DSa!U,,.flfJ _Jlf' :!frt\;til1 ,***ld lf1~ lf.!lf !i *I#( !~tff:ftfi I , )S14tr,ftur l lllb~1

~tie i

ir.'{I\Jlfllf'1tfl! \, Olli

,411tt ,4;1, i',!cfid\ltflillU}n /l;l!l!l

'Hino

\$f,"'J

'*lf.*"'1 .;1 11r;,1fi :'f'<i$,I

,*.*.;Ui

>'{.:~~ *j

~n ,~r tl'\J ii:t4#'

~~;1i,t:,,~,*t :*;

~t>!,:.. 1iJ) *itlf'i:" 1, il*i,!t ijl~ $rinq

,itift t*d~i-:4 i4f\J *,tq;.H*lltrt !f#

'ffi,it-.! . *,f;>.,,latn:1*  :,'\H t.,,... Mt1J'iij 1,,1 1 r..- ~.rl*;.J-8* l I

Ad1u&lm*m $J Oi, #<f!:t-~f).fP'f>>'lf l).*'4tf u' ty I ' 1

  • ~~ '\>,,Wilj.{1;.Jt

$Ji ij(J(i I

i )1,1.l!Ht,)I I ~<)1

~ t;,ltlif}ffi4.l!lt <c,t,0:11 $& t)ijd)

~ifR4P Prl\ldw~")" ' *o,u f~;:i.~ ,j ! .. Hlt);

ii M ij13¥11t, !'.i"-i;tjli.t L".tMIJ

, iH l ~dilm.tt1@ Ni/Ii I /\dji,!il!Hll/lll I ',lefftttl Ofil,;:.- "' ~!iiWII f 1.flll i.-:l)!l,l A4li..-t(rnlit,1 Mt;l)!l!l,non

,$!Jl'i;~;.;.,

l~~.~;;

ii)(;\,

I I

ATTACHMENT 7

., WHITE MESA MILL RECLAMATION COST REVIEW NRC Est,mate Cost AdJustment Attachment 7 I

199§ "lbOOi&I ~ liSS E11Jroatt I Mill Oecomm1ss1ornng $1,484,551 $10,955 $1.495 506 I Cell 2 Cell 3

$1 735,852

$2,215,999

($186.860)

($293,369)

$1.548.992

$1.922 630 I Cell4A $114.756 $3.071 $117 827 I Cell 1 Miscellaneous

$738,371

$2.045 035

$8.547

\$127,800)

$746 91v

$1 917 235 I Subtotal Direct Costs ---$8334,5$4 - - - ($585 455) $7 749 109 Profit Altowance 10 00%

I Contingency 15 00%1

$833.456

$1.250. 185

($58,545)

($87 818)

$17491 1

$1 162 366 I Lrcsnsmg & Bonding 2 00% $166 691 ($11 709) $154 982 Long Term Care Fund $585 JOO $18.836 $604 136

.I Total Reclamation

"""'-"'-'*-'**.<"*W*'***

$11 !70 L.

§g" -----Ts124 ii2T " $10°445505 I Ad/v&tment tor Inflation as Required by NRC" Current eond Amount

$299 6fB

$1 t .419,!~'

($299 663)

. . . ilTof.f3Tff"*******-*-s10445 aoo *

$0 I '*~~~-nt 91,1~** lor lnfl1.tt0n ** 1equ1re<:1 by NRC htl 1m::t*1Md the borid$(t iarr,tn,ni to:

  • Ail tt . II f . 0 .**. . . . .. I I rKrl!l'lttiGn by 2 681% aoK.f , ~

I

1
  • I
      • .. , *
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20015A357&oldid=2471267"