ML20011D986

Notice of Violation from Insp on 891113-16.Violation Noted: Blade Drop Time Check Not Performed within Eight Months After Being Performed on 881205 & Quarterly Scram Checks Not Performed within Four Months After 890221

ML20011D986
Person / Time
Site:	05000083
Issue date:	01/04/1990
From:	Julian C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20011D983	List: ML20011D982 ML20011D984 ML20011D986
References
50-083-89-04, 50-83-89-4, NUDOCS 9001120152
Download: ML20011D986 (1)

Text

.

' y o

g s

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Docket No. 50-83 University of Florida License No. R-56 Gainseville, Florida During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on l

13-16, 1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In November accordance with the. " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2 Appendix C (1989), the violation is listed l

below Technical Specification 4.0 requires that surveillance tests must be l

performed within the specified frequencies.

Contrary to the above, a blade drop time check was not perfomed within eight months (248 calendar days) after being performed on December 5, 1988, and quarterly scram checks were not perfomed within four months (124 calendar days) after being performed on February 21, 1989.

This'is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).

4 Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, University of Florida is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to Commission, ATTN:

the Regional Administrator, Region II, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include (for each violation]:

(1)admissionor denial of the violation, (2) the retson for the violation if a corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved. (4 the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and 5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Where good cause is shown.

consideration will be given to extending the response time.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COPNISSION b'

Caudie A. Julian, Chief Engineering Branch l

Division of Reactor Safety i

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this % day of January 1990 9001120152 891218 FDR ADOCK 0500 3

.