ML20010B930
| ML20010B930 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1981 |
| From: | Miller L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010B927 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-206-81-24, NUDOCS 8108180489 | |
| Download: ML20010B930 (2) | |
Text
_
APPENDIX A HOTICE OF VIOLATION j
l Southern California Edison Company Docket No. 50-206/81-l t
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1 License DRP-13 t
As a result of the inspection conducted on June 1 to July 1, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1960) the following violation was identified:
Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained that meet j
or exceed the requirements and reccmmendations of Sections 5.1 i
and 5.3 of ANSI N 18.7-1976, " Administrative Controls for Nuclear l
Power Plants."
Paragraph 5.3.8 of ANSI N 18.7-1976, " Chemical Radio / Chemical Control Procedures" requires in part, that procedures shall be provided for chemical control activities.
They should include i
limitations on concentrations of agents that could cause corrosive attack (en reactor coolant system piping, in this case).
Station Order SOI-A0109, " Station Documents - Preparation, Revision and Review," defines the responsibilities for preparation, review, approval and revision of San Onofre Unit 1 documents.
Paragraph 6.4.8 of that order, " Procedures Prepared b; Outside Contractors" requires that contractor procedures be assigned a special procedure number, and that they be reviewel by the OSRC and approved by the Plant Manager.
i Contrary to thece requirements, the licensee attempted to control chemical conditions during startup in accordance with Revision III to the Westinghouse " Steam Generator Soak /
Flush Procedure".
This procedure required significant changes in the limits of chemical parameters to be maintained from the recommended Station Order for chemical control, S-E-2, Revisions
+
{
12, " Operation, Maintenance and Chemical Control of Heat Ex-change Equipment."
No approved station procedure implemented the chemical control procedures and limits which were used by station personnel during the heatup and power escalation por-tions of the Unitu' return to power.
This is a Severity Level 5 Violation.
8108180489 810731 PDR ADOCK 05000206 G
m._
s Southern California Edison Company,
I i
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Southern California Edison Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply,-including:
(1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further items of noncompliance; and (3)'the date when full compliance will-be achieved.
Consideratian may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
The responses directed by this Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the l
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Original signed by dated July 31, 1981 Tolbert Young, Jr. for L. Miller, Resident Inspector 1
4 t
=
APPEND 1X B Southern California Edison Company Docket No. 50-206 P. O. Box 800 License No. DPR-13 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 NOTICE OF DEVIATION Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted during the period June 1 to July 1, 1981, it appears that one of your act-ivities was not conducted in conformance with generally accepted industry standards as indicated below.
ANSI N 18.7-1976, " Administrative Controls and Quality nal Phase of Nuclear Power Plants,"
i Assurance for the Operat Paragraph 5.2.2, "Proceuere Adherence," recommends that rules shall be established which provide methods by which temporary changes to approved procedures can be made, including the designation of a person or persons authorized to approve such changes.
Temporary changes which clearly do not change the intent of the approved procedure, shall as a minimum be approved by two members of the plant staff knowledgeable in the areas affected by the procedures.
At least one of these individuals shall be the supervisor in charge of the shift.
Contrary to this recommendation, the licensees' project organization procedure TI-01 " Test Procedure Preparation, Review Approval and Evaluation," allowed test engineers to deviate from an approved test procedure provided only that they documented the deviation for post-test review and approval.
i'his is a deviation. (0 pen Item 50-206/81-24-01) g,s,. _ M
%