Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: 05000266/LER-1981-009, Forwards LER 81-009/01T-0, 05000266/LER-1981-009-01, /01T-0:on 810714,per IE Bulletin 80-11 Analyses, Contractor Reported That Four Control Room & Two Battery Room Walls Did Not Meet Revised Criteria for Seismic Event. Caused by Reanalysis Per Revisions.Supports Installed, ML19312F018, ML19327A057, ML19351F304, ML20005B269, ML20010G974, ML20010G981, ML20010G988, ML20010G992, ML20010G998, ML20011A461, ML20011A463, ML20011A466, ML20011A469, ML20011A476, ML20011A483, ML20011A484, ML20011A488, ML20030B585, ML20030B590, ML20030B594, ML20053A618, ML20054F570
|
MONTHYEARML19327A0571980-07-18018 July 1980
Responds to IE Bulletin 80-11, Masonry Wall Design. Fifty- Two Masonry Walls or Blockouts Whose Failure Could Affect safety-related Equipment Identified.Walls Will Be Upgraded or Verified as to Required Design Loadings
Project stage: Other
ML19351F3041980-12-26026 December 1980
Suppl 800718 Response to IE Bulletin 80-11 Re Masonry Wall Design.Wall Omitted from First Analysis Will Be Reanalyzed Using Criteria of
Project stage: Other
ML20005B2691981-06-19019 June 1981
Trip Rept of 810608-12 Site Visit to Conduct Annual Plant Visit & Audit Masonry Wall Site
Project stage: Other
ML20011A4881981-06-30030 June 1981
Masonry Test Procedures for Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant. Responses Encl
Project stage: Other
ML20236Y4401981-07-0101 July 1981
Summary of Site Audit & 810609-11 Meeting W/Util Re Response to IE Bulletin 80-11 on Masonry Walls.Lists of Attendees & Action Items Resulting from Meeting Encl
Project stage: Meeting
ML20009D5301981-07-17017 July 1981
Forwards Masonry Test Procedures for Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant, in Response to Questions Raised at 810609-11 Meeting W/Nrc Re Onsite Review & Audit of Util Responses to IE Bulletin 80-11
Project stage: Meeting
05000266/LER-1981-009-01, /01T-0:on 810714,per IE Bulletin 80-11 Analyses, Contractor Reported That Four Control Room & Two Battery Room Walls Did Not Meet Revised Criteria for Seismic Event. Caused by Reanalysis Per Revisions.Supports Installed1981-07-28028 July 1981
/01T-0:on 810714,per IE Bulletin 80-11 Analyses, Contractor Reported That Four Control Room & Two Battery Room Walls Did Not Meet Revised Criteria for Seismic Event. Caused by Reanalysis Per Revisions.Supports Installed
Project stage: Other
05000266/LER-1981-009, Forwards LER 81-009/01T-01981-07-28028 July 1981
Forwards LER 81-009/01T-0
Project stage: Other
ML20011A4841981-07-31031 July 1981
Modal Contribution to Dynamic Analysis Results
Project stage: Other
ML20030B5851981-08-14014 August 1981
Forwards Responses to Action Items 8,15,18,19 & 20 Formulated During NRC 810609-11 Onsite Review & Audit of Util Responses to IE Bulletin 80-11, Masonry Wall Design
Project stage: Other
ML20010G4041981-08-27027 August 1981
Summary of 810825 Meeting W/Util & Consultants Re Masonry Wall Prism Sample Mod
Project stage: Meeting
ML20030B5941981-08-31031 August 1981
Out-of-Plane Drift Effect on Wall 19/9
Project stage: Other
ML20030B5901981-08-31031 August 1981
Assessment of Reinforcement on Capacity & Behavior of Masonry Walls
Project stage: Other
ML19312F0181981-09-15015 September 1981
Concrete Block & Prism Testing
Project stage: Other
ML20011A4661981-09-30030 September 1981
Evaluation of Allowable Tensile Stresses Normal to Bed Joint
Project stage: Other
ML20010G9811981-09-30030 September 1981
Justification of Using Plate Solution for Wall 3-1/1
Project stage: Other
ML20010G9741981-09-30030 September 1981
Evaluation of Single Wythe Assumption to Represent Multiple Wythe Walls
Project stage: Other
ML20011A4761981-09-30030 September 1981
Evaluation of Single Wythe Assumption to Represent Multiple Wythe Walls
Project stage: Other
ML20010G9981981-09-30030 September 1981
Comparison Between Finite Element Plate Analysis & One Way Beam Action
Project stage: Other
ML20010G9921981-09-30030 September 1981
Procedure to Account for Out-of -Plane Interstory Drift Effects on Masonry Wall Evaluation
Project stage: Other
ML20011A4631981-09-30030 September 1981
Evaluation of Allowable In-Plane Shear Stresses & Strains
Project stage: Other
ML20010G9881981-09-30030 September 1981
Evidence of Voting on Bssc Ballot Item 5A/46
Project stage: Other
ML20011A4831981-09-30030 September 1981
Procedure to Account for Out-of-Plane Interstory Drift Effects on Masonry Wall Evaluation
Project stage: Other
ML20011A4691981-09-30030 September 1981
Compressive Strength of Prisms & Concrete Blocks
Project stage: Other
ML20011A4611981-10-0707 October 1981
Forwards Addl Info in Response to IE Bulletin 80-11 Re Masonry Walls
Project stage: Other
ML20053A9871982-05-11011 May 1982
Forwards Results from Review of Responses to IE Bulletin 80-11, Masonry Wall Design. Bulletin Fully Implemented for Facility Subj to Review & Acceptance of Confirmatory Plate Analysis
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML20053A6181982-05-18018 May 1982
Forwards Technical Evaluation Rept Re Masonry Wall Design, Inadvertently Omitted from .W/O Encl
Project stage: Other
ML20054F5701982-06-11011 June 1982
Forwards Addl Info Re Safety Evaluation Concerning Implementation of IE Bulletin 80-11, Masonry Wall Design. Results of Confirmatory Plate Analysis After Mods on Walls 19,111-1,111-3N,113 & 114 Encl
Project stage: Other
1981-07-31
[Table View] |
Text
Tf L
'\\
U f
c.
/
~~
c ;qesu b
c,
/
/
~,.,
~.
Wisconsin Electnc mua came a
L 231 W. MICHIGAN. P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKIE, WI 51201 h
U j
y 3
December 26, 1980 Mr.
J.
G.
Keppler, Regional Director Office of Inspection ana Enforcement Region III U.
S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO!CIISSION 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
Dear Mr. Keppler:
DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 RESPONSE TO IE BULLETIN 80-11 MASONRY WALL DESIGN In reviewing information gathered during field inspec-tion of masonry block walls, we have determined that wall No. 150 should be added to the list of safety related walls provided with our letter dated July 18, 1980.
This wall is described as follows:
Wall 150-18" blockwall, 3 wythe thick, Aux. building, central part, Elevation 26'-0".
. Attachments:
None Proximity:
Pressure Transmitter 1PT946, Conduit 1T946.
This wall was inadvertently left out of our initial listing.
The wall will be re-analyzed using the criteria presented in our 180 day response, dated November 14, 1980.
Upgrading, if required, will be performed in the manner and according to the schedule presented in our submittal dated December 12, 1980.
Please note that our previous responses to IE Bulletin 80-11, which were dated July 18, November 14 and December 12, 1980, were not properly affirmed in accc-dance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54 (f) as requested in th% Bulletin.
We, therefore, e
f Y
-l 3EC 3 0. 'dM 8101yPO M g
?&. J.
G.
Keppler December 26, 1980 confirm that this letter and those three previous responses to IE Bulletin 80-11 referenced above are affirmed in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54 (f).
Very truly yours,
?
il DJ L
-dIh C. W. Fay, Director Nuclear Power Department Subscribed and sworn to before me This 26th day of December, 1980.
L[-LA C.
WW 5 tary Public, State of Wisconsin 14y Commission expires 7 * [,(
cc:
NRC Resident Inspector Point Beach Nuclear Plant NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement Division of Reactor Operations Inspection l
l l
