ML19329B150
| ML19329B150 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 12/15/1976 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Roe L TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329B143 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001300724 | |
| Download: ML19329B150 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000346/1976018
Text
, . , *
g
,
e
,
,
,
,
,.
.
UNITt0 STATES
.
,.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-_
!
REGloN til
/
799 ftOOSEVELT RoAo
CLEN ELLYN. ILLINOIS 60137
-
.
.
.
DEC 151976
Toledo Edison Company
Docket No. 50-346
-
ATTN:
Mr. Lowell E. Roe
l
Vice President
Facilities Development
,
Edison Plaza
300 Madison Avenue
Toledo, Ohio
43652
I
Gentlemen:
H
'
'
Thank you for your letter of November 24, 1976, in response to
our letter of October 20, 1976, relative to Inspection Report
No. 050-346/76-18.
We have reviewed your letter and find that
additional information is required relative to two of the items,
as discussed below.
Our review of the remaining item indicates
it has been satisfactorily addressed and your corrective action
will be examined during a subsequent inspection.
OQ
In regard to the enforcement item relating to Criterion XIV,
Appendix B,10 CFR Part 50, your response does not address the
problem as described in the Summary of Findings section of the
report but only the example contained in the Report Details.
Our concern is the failure to identify and control the inspection
status of structures, systems, and components during and after
. installation, so that inadvertent damage or injury is precluded.
Our inspection findings indicated that your electrical and instru-
mentation contractors do not have procedures implementing the
requirements of Criterion XIV.
Our review of Bechtel Power
'
Corporation procedure No. BCM-FAP-100, Revision 3, finds this
procedure to be consistent with Criterion XIV, however, the above
described contractors do not appear to have knowledge of this
procedura and are not fcllowing the procedural requirenents.
Please advise us, in writing, of the corrective action you have
l
taken, or pian to take, regarding this matter and the estimst.ed
l
date of completion of rhis corrective action.
$ $
'c,
1, N#kb)$
see d *
.
.
tryg,p
-
,
,
,-
.. . .
,
,
..
.
,
,
.
.
-
-
.
.
.
..
. p.
<
d
DEC 151976
Toledo Edison Company
2-
-
.
Concerning the deviation item, we acknowledge your position as
stated in your letter and during the discussions in our meeting
of December 2, 1976. Our position remains as described in the
inspection report.
We are referring this matter to our head-
quarters for review, and you will be informed of the results of
this review.
'
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this matter.
Sincerely yours,
^#
-
pyL'w}u= es
,,,r
4
.
-
R. F. Heishman, Chief
Reactor Construction and
Engineering Support Branch
-
cc:
Mr. J. Evans
Davis-Besse, Station
Superintendent
O
cc w/1tr dtd 11/24/76:
Central Files
Reproduction Unit NRC 20b
Local PDR
'
, U. Young Park, Power
Siting Commission
.
- o
9
.
.
9
.
..