ML19326C497
| ML19326C497 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 09/01/1977 |
| From: | Rueter D ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Madsen G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19326C462 | List: |
| References | |
| 1-097-1, 1-97-1, NUDOCS 8004230614 | |
| Download: ML19326C497 (2) | |
Text
_ - _ - _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
g*
- m g3
, -f
\\
, '<)
M
(\\
}
l h
H ELPIN G BUILO ARXANSAS GM EN A AK ANS AS POWE A & LIGHT COMPANY p O. Box 551 UT Tt.E A CCK. A AK AN S A S 72203.(501)371 4000 September 1, 1977 1-097-1 2-097-1 Mr. G. L. Madsen, Chief Reactor Operations 6 Nuclear Support Branch Office of Inspection 6 Enforcement Region IV U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011
Subject:
Arkansas Nuclear One-Units 1 5 2 Q
Supplemental Response to Inspection Report Nos.
50-313/77-10 and 50-368/77-11 (File:
0232, 2-0232)
Gentlemen:
j Your letter of July 20, 1977, requested a supplemental response to our letter of July 11, 1977, which was in reply to the subject inspection reports. Your questions are restated below for clarity and are each followed by our response.
Item a.
In your response to Infraction #1, you did.not indicate the steps which were taken or the measures that now exist which will prevent recurrence.
of this infraction.
Response
The requirement for the Safety Review Committee (SRC) to audit the operator requalification pmgram was added to the SRC Charter in Revision 4, dated February 16, 1977, and to the SRC General Plant Audit guidelines in Revi-(]
sion 3, dated February 16, 1977. This point was overlooked in our July 11,
(
)
1977, response and should prevent recurrence of this infraction.
x./
8004230[h
m Mr. G. L Madsen 2-September 1, 1977 1.:097-1 1-097-1 Item b.
In your response to Infraction #2A, you indicated that " Additional controls are under consideration...", but you did not commit to submitting a supplemental response which will describe the additional controls.
Response
Two additional controls were under consideration at the time of our-July 11 letter which were:
1.
A revision to the ANO plant procedures for requisition preparation which would require verification of vendor qualification prior to placement of purchase orders by telephone communication.
2.
A review of all Q-List purchase orders by the APSL Purchasing Department to assure that the designated vendor is on the Quali-fled Vendor List.
Both of these additional controls have been initiated and are in use at the present time.
N Item c.
Your response to Deviation A did not address corrective action relative to the Bechtel and CE Engineering drawings which were not reviewed in accordance with your FSAR commitment.
Response
The FSAR was revised in Amendment 43 dated July 21, 1977, to reflect the intent of our procedures and how these drawings were processed.
Item d.
Your response to Deviation B did not address the corrective action which would be taken with regard to the preventative maintenance items that had not been perfomed, nor did the response commit to providing, in a suppi,e-mental response, your planned action based on the results of the indicated manpower study.
Response
This item will be answered by October IS, 1977.
Very truly yours,
//
O
/
/
n
./ dw O
Donald A. Rueter l
Manager, Licensing DAR:tw l
I
.. _, _