ML19322A728
| ML19322A728 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 07/18/1972 |
| From: | Thies A DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Jennifer Davis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322A703 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911210762 | |
| Download: ML19322A728 (2) | |
Text
-...
U
- 13. S. A. E. C.
COMPLI ANCE ll DUKE PcWER COMPANY ATLANTA,GA.
r3 Powra Butt.orwo adL 20 9 57 AH 'N 4== Soa" c"=" S=='
c"*""== x c
>a' A c. THits p,o, pox care e
semon vect Passectnr PpODUCitOM aevo Taansasassion July 18, 1972 Mr. John G. Davis United States Atomic Energy Commission Directorate of Regulatory Operations Region II, Suite 818 230 Peachtree Street, Northwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: CO:II:CD1 50-269/72-2 50-270/72-1 50-287/72-1
Dear Mr. Davis:
Please refer to my letter of June 2, 1972 which identified to you the existence of an audit task force within the Steam Production Department to satisfy the requirements of Criterion XVIII of 10CFR50, Appendix 3.
In order to clarify the inter-relationship between the General Office Review Committee and this audit task force, a meeting was held with Mr.
C. E. Murphy of your office in Charlotte on June 22, 1972. The purpose of this~1etter is to offer clarifying and supplemental information about the General Office Review Committee and the audit task force as discussed with your Mr. Murphy.
The General Office Review Committee will perform its responsibilities as identified by the Technical Specificaticus and its by-laws.
In order to perform detailed audit functions necessary for satisfactory management surveillance of nuclear power plants under construction and in operation, it was concluded that an audit task force, not necessarily consisting of members of the General Office Review Cocmittee would be necessary to per-form detailed audits. These audits include a detailed examination of procedures, records, and activities to insure accuracy to meet all safety requirements. The audit task force would not be a standing committee but would be selected on the basis of qualifications and appointed to perform specific audits by Mr. E. D. Powell, Assistant Vice President, Steam Pro-duction.
Each audit task force would be appointed upon the recommendation of the General Office Review Committee or whenever Mr'. Powell thought it necessary to perform a specified audit. The audit would be performed in accordance with written procedures and the results of the audit would be written into a report which would then be reviewed by the General Office Review Co=mittee.
We believe that this n thod of review by the General Office Review Co=aittee punto 70
.. ~~
~
(%
~
Mr. John G. Davis Page 2 July 18, 1972 and detailed audits by another group offers the best method of management surveillance of activities within a nuclear power plant.
The by-laws of the General Office Review Committee will be revised to identify the provisions fo~ the use of this audit task force and the Technical Specifications s".~1 be revised to identify the relationship between the audit team and the General Office Review Committee.
Please advise if you have further questions in this area.
Very truly yours, f.S A. C. Thies ACT;vr cc:
Mr. W. S. Lee Mr. W. H. Owen Mr. R. L. Dick Mr. E. D. Powell a
~s a