ML19319D039

LER 78-025/03L-0:on 780418,175 Ft Wind Indication Lost. Caused by Worn Out Wind Speed Sensor Bearing.Sensor Renewed

ML19319D039
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	05/10/1978
From:	Cooper J FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19319D036	List: ML19319D035 ML19319D039
References
LER-78-025-03L, LER-78-25-3L, NUDOCS 8003040959
Download: ML19319D039 (2)

Text

__. __ _ _ _ _. _

e

v. s. muctaAa naeusaroav coasseession mac.,ronne

.. ans LICENSEE EVENT REPORT EXHIBIT A l cominot stoco l l 1 ietaAsa penwr on tves Au. neouinso empoamaarions l l l .l@

i ITT71 . .

IF I Li C R\ PIi. 3i Jg[.0 ; 0l- ol w0.al -Oi -..a0 g 0:0 l -l0 a l2. 0 jgl oc 4 .. l l 1l1 l1[gl ., u n ;- lg oc o u coo.^

con r t -i0i 3:0 i 2e gia :4: li8 i 7 i agi o!5 it i Oi 7 8 al@

0 l o ' ' .'

%"J L.L_GI 0i 5 0..,m..... o .. , s.r. ,. ...oa , o. . .

avswr oascascrion amo anosasta consacus=cas @

g gat 1400 the 175 ft. wind indicacTon was lost contrary to Technical Specif1 g

r. uni i cation 3.3.3.4. The 175 ft. vind soeed sensor was renewed and returned I i

j g i o service t within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The 33 ft. wind indicator was available. I e i o hazard N to the health and safety of the public as no raseous releases I

were in progress. g o , l l FTTT1 I l

> .. a

.3,'M *

'31'."  ?!a cou.e.s :cos s .Tfo. s!'M.

ioisi I II E l@ LEj@ g@ [ IIN l Si Tl RI Ul@ @@ W i, i

i.  :=

> . . is i.

u o','.%rtaL CCggest%*s at.om, REV858ose c::

n .arve>= t o r ~a. .

a e'

• o

6 ,",u. ;g; .o 1718 I l-l 10 121 51 1/1 C, ., LL.J L-l L9J

_a. n u 2. ., ,, . a v u s Of' %@ o'A'R, ' M i' u , nn ^".%11' . ,e':.*M **,%?. " E*N#4.

IuA G L...Zj @ IZl@ W@ v l0f 0 0 F01 W@ 1NI@ l Il@ I Cl4 ii_ .,i 5!@

. a .. .. u u cAuss essemimon Asscomasern: AcTiess @

i . 4 o i l Investigation revealed that the 175 f . wind somed sanmar heavine was i FTTU I worn out. No corrective action necessary as the wind speed sensor was  ;

,,,.ii renewed. Second occurrence of an event of this type, Refer to LER 77-48.g ti t ai i l l' i i t t

'sr*lrE s on.= or-casra,tes @ eiSESN.'  : s:even,:: cmerio., @

, 1i6.I LH,,J @ l01010 l@l

' .c'r.u r, "

Defueled l Lf@l" **

Ooerator observation a

i j e.4:ssr

..u u.o . ..u u i ". e a :. ..rour, @ " ' toc ..e .. ..u u. @

t {,1[,1,j (,Z_] [,JJ@l NA l l NA l

' ,.-.,m. . 'd i =,,"..u ,, . e @

i 10 i of 0@L,g@l NA l

' ' ' ,. .. .s s d'.s,Ji u " a

s. v. = :ss:= mosh lil-l10101Q@l

, s . - ,:

NA

• J.. =

' C',

l 8 I a l W@9:Y;7,".'.:'.*, l NA'" @ l N .g ggg;t et og NAO UE DLY 1:Iall[9@l

. . . u NA g g: ,,,i

,,,il NavtOrretrAata .T . Cmer a-oss (904 ) 795-6486 i g nT] (SEE ATTAC1 D SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SHEET) d M b L UU h ... .. . _ . . . . . . . . - _ -

.600304 p g -

~

v '

SUPPLDENTARY IhTORMATION 1 port No.: 50- 302/78-025/03L-0 2 cility: Crystal River Unit #3

3. Report Date: 10 May 1978 4 Occurrence Date: 18 April 1978

5. Identification of Occurrence: )

175 ft. wind speed indication was lost contrary to Technical Specification 3.3.3.4.

l

6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence: '

l Mode 6 refueling. .. l

7. Description of Occurrence: l At 1400 of 18 April 1978 both the digital readout indication and recorder indications 1 for the 175 ft. wind speed indicator were discovered inoperable. An investigation '

revealed that the 175 ft. wind speed sensor bear 1.ig was worn out. The wind speed sensor was renewed and reca11 braced using the Mececrological Monitoring System Calibration Procedure (SP-158) and restored operable within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

8. Designation of Apparent Cause:

The cause of this event was due to a worn bearing in the 175 ft. wind speed sensor.

t

• 9 lysis of Occurrenen:

There was no hazard to the health and safety of the plant or general public as the 33 ft. wind speed indicator was operable and no gaseous releases in progress.

10. Corrective Action:

No corrective action necessary as the wind speed sensor for the 175 ft. elevation was renewed.

11. Failure Data:

Second occurrence of loss of wind speed indication bu:: the first occurrence involving the 175 ft. sensor.

O