ML19317D594
| ML19317D594 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/1973 |
| From: | Warnick R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317D586 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912060836 | |
| Download: ML19317D594 (1) | |
See also: IR 05000269/1973004
Text
-
u
?
o ec%,,
UNITED STATES
a
[v* b Tg
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
,
l !(
o<
DIRECTCRATE OF REGULATORY CPERATICNS
-
a
J
Region n - suite ses
s
233 PE ACHT R E E STR EET, NoRT MWEST
,
,
I/4rg$C'
AT LA MT A, GECRGI A 30 J03
June 5, 1973
Files
DPC's REQUEST TO DELETE INFORMATION FROM RO INSPECTION REPORT NO.
50-269/73-4
.
I called DPC on May 31, 1973, to talk to Paul Barton on DPC's request
to delete information because of its proprietary nature.
The follow-
ing information was given to me by Rudy Straub of B&W.
Ken Canady and
Ed Smith of DPC were also in on the' conversation.
Rudy said that the boron concentrations quoted in the report were in
error and for that reason B&W did not want them in the report. He
indicated that correct values would not be objected to as proprietary.
(The boron concentrations, reported during the time period of the ini-
tial approacn to critical, were in error because a mistake was made by
site chemistry personnel in the preparation of the chemical solution
which was used in the laboratory determinations of boron concentration.)
Concerning reactor coolant flow and acceptance criteria, Rudy said that
this was proprietary because it might be possible for someone to use
the beginning of life and end of life values and determine some basic
proprietary information.
He also stated ,that the acceptance criteria
were being revised.
I told DPC that the errors in the boron concentrations would be reviewed
during the next inspectica and covered in the report of that inspection.
I also told them that in my opinion the infor=ation was not proprietary
but that the items would be referred to Headquarters and they would
establish the official AEC position.
.
I indicated to Ed and Ken that I thought the errors in boron concentrations
'
were reportable under Technical Specification 1.9.c.
They said they did
not consider them reportable.
.
.
l
'
R. F. Warnick, Reactor Inspector
,
'
RO:II:RFW:gg
Feilities Test and Startup Branch
e
,
..l>
.
-
\\'
.. --
..
. . .
-
l
P
,
-
.-
.
.
._
.
-.
.