IR 05000269/1973004
| ML19317F048 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1973 |
| From: | Murphy C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Thornburg H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317F049 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001080744 | |
| Download: ML19317F048 (1) | |
Text
s
'
,
I
.
/
.c UNITED STATES g'
'e' i ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
"A s
l lr
DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS
,
ncoion n - suir e eis
'%,,/T,'j]9/
230 peacar ace sincer woar w csr
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
114rgk 0 Ar L. A NT A. Gc ORo t A 30303 August 22, 1973
,
H. D.' Thornburg, Chief, Field Support and Enforcement Branch Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Headquarters DUKE PO' ER COMPANY (OCONEE 1), LICENSE NO. DPR-38, DOCKET NO.
50-269 - LICENSEE'S REQUEST FOR DELETION OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION, REPORT NO. 50-269/73 4 Enclosed for your information is a memorandum to files documenting
,
a telephone conversation among R. F. Warnick, Region II, Paul Barton, K. S. Canady and J. E. Smith, Duke Power Company, and R.
?
Straub, Babcock and Wilcox Company.
Additional information on this subject is contained in my memorandum to you dated June h, 1973.
,f/f/ na 't C. E. Murphy, f
RO:II:CEM Facilities Test and Startup Branch Enclosure:
Memo to Files dtd 6/5/73 cc v/ enc 1:
RO:HQ Files (DRCentralFiles
-
.
,.
b
.
j TRANSMITTED BY FACSIMILE i
2:20 p.m.
(j c)
H.l 8-22-73
-
lM;;J J
8001080/
,
vc@'
LINITED STATES
'[p
'q ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
,
l lc'
p*
l j
DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS e
k/ [
REGloN il - SulTE SIS 230 PE AC HT R E E ST RE ET. NORT HwEST I/ rgg 09
AT LANT A GEORGE A 30303
,,
June 5, 1973 Files'
DPC's REQUEST TO DELETE INFORMATION FROM RO INSP 50-269/73-4
.
-
I called DPC on May 31, 1973,
.
to delete information because of its proprietary nature.to talk to Paul Barton o ing information was given to me by Rudy Straub of B&W.
The follow-Ed Smith of DPC were also in on the conversation.Ken Canady and Rudy said that the boron concentrations quoted in the report were in error and for that reason B&W did not want them in the report.
indicated that correct values would not be objected to as pr He (The boron concentrations, reported during the time period of the ini oprietary.
tial approach to critical, were in error because a mistake was m d
-
site chemistry personnel in the preparation of the chemical solution a e by which was used in the laboratory determinations of boron concentration )
.
Concerning reactor coolant flow and acceptance criteria this was proprietary because it might be possible for someone to
, Rudy said that the beginning of life and end of life values and determine some b use proprietary information.
asic were being revised.
He also stated that the acceptance criteria I told DPC that the errors in the boron concentrations would be re during the next inspection and covered in the report of that inspectio wed but that the items would be referred to Headquarters an n.
establish the official AEC position.
I indicated to Ed and K a that I
were reportable under Technical Specification 1.9.c.I thought the errors in boro not consider them reportable.
They said they did
'
i
!
,k
-
$[
{
.
.
RO:II:RFW:gg R. F. Warnick, Reactor Inspector Facilities Test and Startup Branch
,
M f
PP
.O\\
.
I
i:
e (
l 7 912 o@<P3 G
,