ML19317D297
| ML19317D297 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 04/07/1971 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Thies A DUKE POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317D288 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911270350 | |
| Download: ML19317D297 (2) | |
Text
_
\\
3 4
(
)
g~. y. ' o(.,,
m.!
-o....~a
.c.
g lg? T 6 xyi a i OMIC E!.E.O.GY COMMISS!CN
/
. jm.
,y( q' 4 47 civisicN CF CoVPUANcc g..,
=cc cs o -
w.* s sie Sdf,e 23: PE a c H 7 5 ;c :;T A E E *
- .;R*e#EST
'u n.'
,.;g, 4r 4s
.sec u 2:::3 4 g g 4"/
4 3 */4 Mi n i 1011
,,, L
'"' a s) I Luke Power Ccapany A TN :
Mr. A. C. Thics, ',* ice h esidant Production and Operatica
?cwer Building 422 South Church Streat Charlotte, North Carolina 2 3: 3'.
Gentlemen:
Thts letter relates to the discuscion F.r. 7. L. 3.ownice of this office held with Messrs. D. M. Lesm and G. L. Hunnicutt of your staff the conclusion of the inspection on March 11-12, 1C71, regarding at the construction activities authoriced by AEC Constructica Permit Nos. CPPR-34 and 35 for Cconee Units 2 and 3.
As noted during the discussions, an apparant deficiency was iden-tified involving nonconformance with Aopendi>: 3 to 10 CFR 50 of the AEC Regulations, " Quality Assurance Criteria for :iuclear Power Plants," as folicws:
Criterion VI, "Dect: ent Control," requires that neasures shall be established to centrol the issuance cf doct::ents, such as instructions, precedures, and drawings, including changes thereto, which prescribe all activities affecting quality. Changes to documents shall be reviewed and approved by the same organizations that perfen.ed the original review and approval unless the applicant designates another respon-sible organication.
Contrary to the abcve, there is no evidence that Duke has a QC proced.:re for document control. Drawings identified for
" Unit One Only," were observed in the working file for Unit 2 i;ogether with obsolete drawings.
7 911270 Y0 o
- =
A w'*'
s o
G I
+ <
2-APR 7 19 71 Duke Power L upany The deficie.,.y raises the question whether Duke is exere sing 4
adequate control of field documents to assure that construction is performed in accordance with the latest revisiens of these documents.
4 i
Please provide us, witt.in 30 days of your receipt of this letter, with your ecm:ments concerning these items and any cteps which have been or will be taken to correct them and to minimize recur ences.
Your reply should emphasize, in particular, any appropriate changes that have been or will be taken to i= prove the effectiveness of your quality assurance program.
i
(
Should you have any questicas concerning the matters discussed in this
'4 letter, you may communicate directly vich this office.
[
Very truly yours, i
f
/2
\\. m.: % m I
[JohnG. Davis CO:II:VL3 r Director
]
i l
bec:
J. B. Henderson, CO:HQ (4) l A. Giambusso, CO:HQ L. Kornblith, Jr., CO:HQ R. H. Engelken, CO:HQ i
4 w e.*
e
- m S
h e
- A.
_.E
, w si w _
-me.m
=%.-
6
. ww w -
e..ee m
- +4e=
e=+-*e w-i y
,~.w e,,-
,y e-
,,wr e,
c y,
+_
_