ML19316A953
| ML19316A953 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 08/25/1979 |
| From: | Fouke R CITIZENS FOR FAIR UTILITY REGULATION |
| To: | Chandler L NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19316A949 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8005280093 | |
| Download: ML19316A953 (9) | |
Text
Enclesuro 2 CITizsNs F R FAIR UTILITY REGULATION (CFUR)
.O 1668-8 CARTER DRIVE ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76010 Docket No. 50 4 5 August 25, 1979 and 50 4 6 Lawrenen J. Chandler Office of Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Chandler:
SUBJECT:
CFUR'S FIRST INFOPRAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION TO THE NRC Pursuant to our conversation of July 17th, concerning the status of-the capability to request infomation on an infomal basis, CFUR's first infomal request for infomation follows. The request concerns information from a number of different sources and is grouped according to source.
I. NRC Staff In-House Projects CFUR has detemined that the NRC staff initiated a number of projects related to the Three Mile Island-2 accident-studies, research evaluations, and support projects. CFUR realizes that a number of the projects as originally defined have since been redefined to be incorporated into larger efforts, but CFUR requests that all interim reports as well as final reports, if available, be supplied for the following projects:
A. Insnection and Enforcement 1.1 ACTITITY - IE Investigation 1.2 OBJECTIVE - To establish the facts concerning the TMI accidents and to evaluate licensee perfomance "as a basis for corrective action or enforcement action as appropriate."
1.3 TARGET DATE - August i B. Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards 1.1 ACTIVITY - Recriticality Potential for TMI-2 core 1.2 OBJECTIVE - Analysis of potential for recriticality 1.3 TARGET DATE - Completed 2.1 ACTIVITY - TMI Waste Transportation 2.2 OBJECTIVE - Assess adequacy of emiating package designs.to transport solidified waste from TMI to disposal sites.
2.3 TARGET DATE - Six weeks after detemination of nature of waste and disposal schedule 8 0 0 5 280 ot3 Paga 2
-2.
C. Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1.1 ACTIVITY - TMI-2 site support - core cooling, cleanup and recovery operations 1.2 OBJECTIVE - a) prepare Tee specs: b) analyze plant activities in relation to ALARA objectives e) perfom analysis of dose to public via all. pathways: d) analyze proposed plane for major operations, in-
. cluding longtime cleanup and core removal.
1.3 TARGET DATE - Ongoing 2.1 ACTIVITY - Availability of Primary Financial Protection'at TMI 2.2 OBJECTIVE - Study alternatives to NRC for dealing with $20 million
" gap" in protection.
D. Nuulear Regulatory Research 1.1 ACTIVITY - Long-tem Cooling Plan 1.2 CDJECTIVE - Assess effect of HPI operation on natural circulation 1.3 TARGET DATE - Completed 2.2 ACunn - Noise analysis diagnostic coordination. Detamine status of TMI core using neutron noise measurements 2.2 CBJECTIVE - Marinam use of loose parts monitoring systems: determine the status of the TMI-2 plant 2.3 TARGET DATE - July 1 3.1 ACTIVITY - Natural Circulation System Analysis 3.2 OBJECTIVE - Calculate natural circulation in BdM plant with damaged reactor core 3.3 TARGET DATE - Completed 4.1 ACTIVITY - Containment venting conceptual design 4.2 OBJECTIVE - Develop controlled venting scheme as contingency to loss of containment integrity 4.3 TARGET DATE - Comoleted 5.1 ACTIVITY - Inputing TMI-2 fuel parameters to COBRA to calculate fuel damage 5.2 OBJECTIVE - Detemine extent of core damage 5.3 TARGET DATE - Completed 6.1 ACTIVITY - Hydrogen uptake and dissolution in reactor systems 6.2 OBJECTIVE - Predict hydrogen content of TMI cooling water and develoo purging methods 6.3 TARGET DATE - Completed
En31erre 2 Paga 3
, i 7'41 ACTIVITY - Interpret pressu e level readout in TMI-2 control room during accident 7.2 OBJECTIVE - Detemine if readout could have misled operator
.concerning presence of coolaat in core 7.3 TARGET DATE - Completed 841 ACTIVITY - Independent expert study of probable core condition 8.2 OBJECTIVE - Advise NRR whether core condition should pemit safe shutting off of cooling pumps l
8.3 TARGET DATE - Completed l
9.1 ACTIVITY - Compute TMI-2 response to initial transient.and natural circulation 9.2 OBJECTIVE - Develop a version of SSC to enable simulation of system-wide transients generic to a TMI-type reactor 9.3 TARGET DATE - February, 1980 10.1 ACTIVITI - Coolability of mbblized TMI core debris 10.2 OBJECTIVE - Provide NRC/TMI team with results of calculations 10.3 TARGET DATE - Completed 11.1 ACTIVITY Evaluate 4 in reactor vessel and containment building 11.2 09JECTIVE - Evaluate quantities that could be dissolved.in the primary coolant water, means by which H in the primary coolant system 2
in e ntainment might be reduced, and available methods for reducing H2 atmosphere 11.3 TARGET DATE - Completed 12.1 ACTIVITY - Monitoring radioiodine from loss of contahment accidents 12.3 TARGET DATE - Ongoing 13.1 ACTIVITY - Probabilistic analysis - staff studies 13.2 OBJECTIVE - Analyze range of alternative outcomes of various TMI events 13.3 TARGET DATE - Completed - 13 seperate studies issued 14.1 ACTIVITY - Research Contract - Post-licensing Studies 14.2 OBJECTIVE - Assass socio-economic impacts 14.3 TARGET DATE - 9/79 15.1 ACTIVITY - Core damage assessment 15.2 OBJECTIVE - Detemine when and if core became uncovered, duration, and assess resulting core damage 15.3 TARGET DATE - Was to be completed June 1 l
Pago 4 4-16.1 ACnun-Input TMI-2 characteristics in TRAC at Los Alamos and calculate transient 16.2 OBJECTIVE - Perfom calculations 17.1 ACTIVITT-Preliminary requalification requiments for TMI-2 17.2 OBJECTIVE - NRC must evaluate need for new decont. amination pro-cedures, assessment of overall damage, handling of damaged fuels, i
removal and replacement of components, etc.
17.3 TARGET DATE - Completed 18.1 ACuvm - Potential methods of venting gas bubble fron*PWR coolant system 18.2 OBJECTIVE - Prepare test plan to evaluate potential methods 18.3 TARGBT DATE - Planned - end of July 19.1 ACunn - Study instrumentation to indicate reactor vessel water level in PWR's 19.2 OBJECTIVE - Identify and recomend instrumentation to provide accurate indication 19.3 TARGET DATE - Complated 20.1 ACTIVITY - Determination of coolant water availability by location during accident i
20.2 OBJECTIVE - Accurately calculate thema1 hydraulic phenomena 20.3 TARGET DATE - End of August 21.1 ACnun - Calculate empressibility of steam /noncondensible gas mixtures 21.2 OBJECTIVE - Evaluate effect of vapor condensation on compressibility 21~.3 TARGET DATE - Was to be completed 22.1 ACTIVITY - Backup review of natural circulation cooling 22.2 O9JECTIVE - Determine circulation rates for farious plant configurations 22.3 TARGET DATE - Completed 23.1 ACTIVITY - TMI mockup and small break tests - semiscale 23.2 09JECTIVE - Simulate first 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> of transient in scaled exoeriment, then complete series of small break tests 23.3 TARGET DATE - First chase comolete - second phase 12/79 24.1 ACTIVITY - Assess hydrogen evolution from impile level damage obtained in experiments 24.2 0'3JECTIVE - Determine how much was generated from prior PBF tests in which fuel rods ruptured and c ad oxidized 24.3 TARGET D1TE - Completed 25.1 ACTIVITY - TMI hydrogen problems 25.2 OBJECTIVE - Prepare draft scope for hydrogen investigation program.
Review TMI scenario as applied to hydrogen generation and release
Ensicsure 2 t
Pago 5
-5 E. Standards Develooment 1.1 ACTIVITY Population and maximtu.: individual dose assessment 1.2 CBJECTIVE - Detemine dose and potential population health effects.
EW report issued, with NRC and EPA approval.
D.1Dtecutive Legal'Directoi-1.1 ACTIVITY - Detemination of Detraordinary Nuclear Occurences 1.2 CBJECTIVE - Infom comissioners of need for ENO detemination 1.3 TARGET DATE - Commission has under review II. ACR3 Activities Cooies of the transcriots # the following portions of 1979 Nuclear Regulatory Commissions' Advisory Comittee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) technical meetings as follows:
1.1 SCEDULED TIMt: Thursday, February 8 from 9:15 to 10:15 AM 1.2
SUBJECT:
The comittee will meet with the Director of the Office of Nuclear Raaetor Regulation to hear a report on the degree to which the NRC staff considers low-probability, high consequence accidents in the licensing process 2.1 SCEDULED TIME: Friday, February 9 from 1:00 to 3:45 PM 2.2
SUBJECT:
The comittee will meet with representatives of the NRC staff to discuss recent operating experience and licensing actions, including NRC setivities related to the capability of nuclear power plants to shut
'down and remove decay heat.
3.1 SCEDULED TIME: Friday February 9 from 3:45 to 5:30 PM 3.2
SUBJECT:
The committee will meet in open executive session to hear and discuss subcomittee reports on emergency core cooling systems, Licensee Event Reports and anticipated transients (abneemal conditions) followed by failure of the reactor shutdown systems as required.
The events are postulated but not expected to occur during the lifetime of the plant.
4.1 SCEDULED TIME: Thursday, March 8 from 1:15 'to 6:15 PM h.2
SUBJECT:
The committee will meet with representatives of the NRC staff to discuss orocosed corrective action to resolve anticipated transients (abnomal conditions) which are followed by failure of the reactor shut-down systems as required.
The events are postulated but not expected to occur during the lifetime of the. plant.
l l
Enclcsure 2 Paga 6 6.-
5.1 SCEEULED TIME: Friday, March 9 from 8:30 to 10:00 AM 5 2 SU3 JECT: The committee will meet in open executive session to discuss the role and responsibilities of the ACRS in the NRC regulatory process.
6.1 SCHEDULED TIME: Thursday, April 5 from 4:30 to 6:30 PM 6.2 SU3 JECT: The comittee will meet with members of the NRC staff to discuss alternative plant modifications to resolve anticipate transients (abnormal conditions) followed by fat]ure of the reactor shutdown systems as re-quired. The events are postulated bit not expected to occur during the lifetime of the plant.
4 7.1 SCEDULED TIME: Saturday, April 7 from 8:30 to 10:30 AM 7.2 SU3 JECT: The comittee will meet in ocen executive session to discuss pmoosed reports on Palo Verde, Sequoyah and crocosed resolution of anticipated transients.
8.1r SCHEDUIED TIME: Saturday, Anril 7 from 11:30 AM to 4:00 PM 8.2
SUBJECT:
The Comittee will meet in open executive session to continue preparation of reports on Palo Verde, Sequoyah and anticipated transients.
9.1 SCEDUIED TIME: Monday, April 16 fron 8:30 to 11:30 AM 9.2 SU3 JECT: The comittee will meet with members of the NRC staff to discuess its evaluation of replies to an NRC bulletin to other operators of dW reactors directing them to perform a series of specific reviews and actions.
I i
10.1 SCEDULED TIME: Monday, April 16 from 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM 10.2
SUBJECT:
The comittee will meet in open executive session to discuss ACPS renorts regarding the current status of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station.
11.1 SCEDULED TIME: Monday Aoril 16 from 2:30 to 5:30 PP 11.2 SUHJECT: The comittee will meet with representatives of the nuclear industry to discuss actions crocosed with resoect to nuclear stations that use B&N reactors.
1 l
12.1 SCEDUIED TIW: Monday April 16 from 5:30 to 7:30 PM 12.2 SU9 JECT: The comittee will meet with members of the NRC staff to discuss the status of the Three Mile Island nuclear station and interim actions taken or olanned to adequately orotect thei oublic health and safety.
13.1 SCHEDULED TIME: Monday, April 16 from 7:30PMIo8: 30 PM 13.2 SU1 JECT: The committee will meet in open executimve session to discuss l
its proposed recommendations to the NRC regarding modifications to H&W l
reactors and the Three Mile Island station.
I 14.1 SCEDUIED TIME: Tuesday, April 17 from 3:30 to 4:00 PM 14.2 SUDJECT: The comittee will discuss future activities regarding evaluation of the Three Mile Island accident,
Enclesure 2 Pago 7
. 15.1 SCHEDUTED TIME: Thursday, June lh from 8:30 to 11:30 AM 15.2 SUBJECT. 'he committee will meet to discuss a report of the committee chairman regarding ACRS activities and a report on the status of ti'ree Mile Island and imolications of the accident.
16.1 SCHEDULED TIME: Thursday, June 14 fran 11:30 AM to 1:00 PM
,16.2
SUBJECT:
The committee will meet with nembers of the NRC staff to discuss the evaluation of licensee. replies to bulletine from the NRC's Office of insoection and Snforcement regarding ooerational errors and system mistlien-ments identified during the accident: NRG orders to ocerators of *1abcock and Wilcox nuclear reactors and NRC staff action in resnonse to ACRS recomendations resulting from the accident.
17.1 SCHEDULED TIME: Thursday, June 14 from 5:30 to 6:30 PM 17.2
SUBJECT:
The committee will discuss reports related to nuclear reactor safety, including proposed revisions to NRC Regulatory Guides, the use of probabilistic assessment by the NRC and return toaoperation of the Fort St. Vrain nuclear reactor in Colorado.
I 18.1 SeHEDULED TIME: Friday, June 15 from 8:30 to 11:30 AM l
18.2 SUDJECT The committee will meet with representatives of Metropolitan Edison to discuss the accident at Three Mile Island, activities following the accident and the current status of the plant.
19.1 SCHEDUI.ED TIME: Friday, June 15 from 5:30 to 6:30 PM 19.2 SU3 JECT: The comittee will meet to discuss prooosed ACRS recommendatioes on TMI: implications of the TMI accident on the design of nuclear facilities and the croposed oower level increase for Millstone 2 l
20.1 SCHEDUICD TIME: Saturday, June 16 from 8:30 AM to 4:00 PM 20.2 StAJBCT: The committee wi13 continue discussions on TMI and Millstone 2 as well as oroposed recorts on a request for a construction permit for the Palo Verde 4 and 5 nuclear oower plants in Arizona and the two unit Sequoyah nuclear station in Tennessee.
21.2 SCHEDULED TIME: Friday, July 13 from 1:30 to 6:30 PM 21.2 SUJJECT: Committee discussions will include the views of its members regarding the basic causes contributing to the Three Mile Island ace' dent and a prooosed recort regarding the ACRS evaluation of licensee Evnet Reports resulting from the operation of nuclear power plants.
22.1 SCHECULED TIME: Saturday, July 14 from 8:30 AM to h:00 E 22.2
SUBJECT:
The committee will discuss prooosed connents and recommenda+1ons regarding the inolications of the Three Mile Island accident and the proposed piling design change at the lailly station.
Enclesure 2 Paga 8 I 23.1 SCHEDULED TIME Wednesday, August 8 l
23.2
SUBJECT:
Detailed analysis of NRR, utility capabilities, and NRC's role regarding the technical qualifications and management structure j
of users hy Harold Denten.
24.3 Any repoM regarding an ACR' evaluation of Licensee Event Reports resulting from the operation of nuclear power plants.
25.1 The mid-July report to the NRC by the ACRS primarily to the NRC safety-research budget request for FI-80 (supplemental) and FY-81, but which includes discussion of TMI.
I III. TMI-2 Lessons learned Task Force i
NUREG-0573 contains the recommendations for short-tem actions or comitments that received a two-thirds majority vote of the TMI-2 Lessons Learned Task Force members present.
- 1. CFUR requasts that infomation describing the title, description and discussion of tho items considered by the Task Force which did not receive a two-thitds majority.
- 2. CFUR requests '. hat the vote count on all items considered by the Task
- Force be suppl 1 W.
i In NUREG-0578, it is Mated that "Seven1 licensing is.:ses raised by TMI-2 are being examined by
)
other groups within the Commission?s staff in coordination with 1
the lessons Learned Task Force.
These are operator training and
)
licensing (CLU), licensee technical qualifications (QA3), instrumen-tation to follow the course of an accident (SD) and emergency pre-pardness (ED0',Ta'ek Force)."
- 3. CFUR requests all interim reports as well as final reports,1f available.
concerning these issues be suppled.
IV. President's comissien
- 1. CFUR requests that all interim reports as well as the final report, when available, imede by and/e to the President's Commissien he supplied.
l
- 2. CFUR requests that all transcripts of the Presidential Commission's hearings be supplied.
V. NRC Sn*eial Inquiry CFUR requests that all interim reports as well.as the final recort, when available, made by and/or to the Soecial -Inquity dirdcted %y Mr. Mitchell Rogovin he sunnlied.
I
Enelesure 2 Pags 9
- VI. Lewis Reoort Provide working papers used by the Lewis Caretittee to fomulate opinions expressed in MUREG/CR-Oh00, " Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Ceretission."
VII. Science Acolications, A.
Scenarios on possible accidents are being prepared by Science Apolications, Draft of the Inc., under subcontract to Sandia Labor & tories, an NRC contractor.
first scenario is now conolete and should be ready for publication as an "interin scenario" in Nofermber. CfUR requests that a copy of the "interin scenario" be made available at the earliest time possible.
VIII. 1, LASH Reoorts
- 1. Please provide a copy of WASH 1283, " Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During Design and Procurement Phase of Nuclear Power Plante."
- 2. Please orovide a cooy of WASH 1300, " Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Fhase of Nuclear Power P1&nts."
- 3. Please provide a copy oc WASH 1284, " Guidance on yun11ty Assurance Requirenents D1 ring the Coerations Phase of Nuclear Power Plants."
IX. AT.!S Please provide a copy of NUREG-Ch60, Vols. 1, 2, and 3.
X. NRC Insoection and Enforcement Comunications Please include CFUR's name on distributien list for all comunications between the NRC I & E division and the applicant, TUGCO, etc.
Please do not wait to send 1equested items all at once but foivard them as they become available, either in whole er in part.
If you have any questions or desire a discussion or clarification of the requested items, please contact us.
Sincerely.
l Richard L. Fouke t
ces: Aeolicant, Other Intervenors
Enclesure 3 Page i
. 'l
- 8%
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
wasHincron. o. c. 20sss l
)
OCT
.g g Richard t.. Fouke Citizens for Fair Utility t'
l Regulation (CFUR) 1668-B Carter Dr.ive g.
Arlington, TX 76010 4..
In the Matter of Texas Utilities Generating Company, e_t a1,,
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2) j Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446
[
l.
Dear Mr. Fouke:
l 25, 1979, and received B
I am writing in response to your letter dated August
].'
at NRC on September 7,1979, which requests information pursuant to ourT i
conversation of ' July 17, 1979.
17, 1979, to discuss the contentions the meeting held by the parties on JulyIn connection with our discussion of proposed by CFUR in this proceeding.
i these contentions, the Staff offered to consider, on an infomal basis, b.'
requests by CFUR for NRC documents related to the specific issues raised A preliminary review of your request of July 17,
['
CFUR in this proceeding.
You i
1979, indicates that your request is beyond the scope of our offer.
request not only documents, but infomation from a number of different sources, one of which (the President's Commission investigating the acci-In addition, some of dent at Three Mile Island, Unit 2) is outside NRC.
I this information does not appear to relate to the specific issues rais
,C the contentions of CFUR.However, based on our preliminary review of your request, we your request.have determined that we can furnish you with certain documents cove your request, as discussed below, under the headings contained in your letter.
P l
"NRC Staff In-House Projects."
I.
You state that CFUR has determined that the NRC Staff initiat projects related to the Three Mile Island accident and request all interim and final reports for thirty-two projects enumerated under this category.
Wa are currently reviewing our records to identify and obtain the reports, A preliminary review has if any, issued with respect to these projects. identified certain reports list under subcategories in Category I.
With respect to subcategory A. " Inspection and Enforcement," youI have obtaine request the report of the "IE Investigation."
enclosed a copy of the. report (NUREG-0600) entitled " Investigation
us. 2 z
2-Richard L. Fouke Into the March 28, 1979, Three Mile Island Accident," which was issued by the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement in August j
1979.
Under Category E. " Standards Development," you refer to a repor:
of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) on popula-I presume that you 1
tion and maximum individual dose assessment.
g are referring to NUREG-0558, " Population Dose and Health Impact of the Accident at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, issued in May
. lc This report, which I am enclosing, contains preliminary 1979.
estimates prepared by the Ad Hoc Interagency Dose Assessment Group',
consisting of NRC, the Environmental Protection Agency, and HEW.
]
In the category entitled " Executive Legal Director," you refer to the activity as "Detemination of Extraordinary Nuclear Occurrences."
As you indicate, the Comission has this detemination underIn Fed U
i l
review.
Reg. 43128), and September 7, 1979 (44 Fed. Lea,E2391), copies of which are enclosed, the Commission stated that pursuant to the l
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Comission is initi-ating a determination as to whether the accident at Three Mile The
,r Island (TMI) constitutes an extraordinary nuclear occurrence.
i notice of September 7 provides that submittals of public coments, along with other information assembled by the Commission from its own and other sources, will be considered by a panel comprised of According to this notice, the panel principal Comission staff.
s l
j intends to complete its work and report to the Commission as soon l
as possible after the panel has had an opportunity to review any infomation relevant to its review presented in the report of the At the j
Presidential Comission investigating the TMI-2 accident.
time the panel reports to the Commission, it intends to publish j
To my its report in the Federal Register for public comments.
1 knowledge, this report has not yet been published, but when pub-l l
lished, I will provide you with a copy.
l t
I I'.
"ACRS Activities" I
You request copies of the transcripts of portions of numerous 1979 meetings Staff counsel does of the Advisory Comittee On Reactor Safeguards (ACRS). Copies may be obtained, not have copies of the transcripts of these meetings.
I at a cost of 84/page from the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) in Washington.
You should direct your request to:
t Lynn Scattolini Public Docunant Room Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
En21csure 3 Paga 3 Richard L. Foulm d
III.
"THI-? Lessoas Luarned Tau! F0: ca co siJn.gl by tne T.II 2 i m i.
You request infor...i t ion rel ating ta d.
Lessons Learned Task Force, such as vo6.:r.o.a.s on all ite.as consi.iere 1 b, the Task Force and inforation describin!! the title, descriptio.i and discus-sion of the items considered by the Task Force which did not receive a two-I am thirds majority vote of the Task Force.
whether such infonnation exists, and if so, uhether it can be furnished to I have obtained a copy of NilREG-0578, "TMI-2 Lessons Learned Task Force Status Report and Short-Tann Recommendations," issued in July 1979, you.
which is enclosed.
V.
"NRC Soecial Inouiry" I am not aware of any reports, interim or final, which have been issuei by When such reports are available, I will provide the NRC Special Inquiry.
them to you.
It is not certain that I can provide you with all of the inf in which you request the working papers of the Committee; VII. " Science Applications" in which you request a copy of the " interim scenario" which you state Science Applications, Inc prepared under subcontract to Sandia I have obtained Laboratories, an NRC contractor, and VIII. "UASH Reports").
a copy of HUREG-0460, " Anticipated Transients Without Scram for Light Water I have contacted the NRC Reactors," which you ask for in Category IX.
i Office of Inspection & Enforcement (I&E) regarding your request in Category X.
l that I&E include CFUR on the distribution list for all communication The Region IV I&E and the Applicant, Texas Utilities Generating Co., et al.
office of I&E advised me that it is not I&E policy to ilidlude Intervenors on According to Region IV, the Comanche Peak Local such distribution lists.
Public Document Room (LPDR) in Glen Rose contains copies of I&E documents relating to Comanche Peak, such as information notices, bulletins, invest'-
gation reports, inspection reports, and other correspondence between IAE Thus, it appears that copies of the the Applicant relating to enforcement.
types of documents covered by your request in Category X. a not available in the LPDR, please contact me so I can attempt to obtain them you at the LPOR.
for you.
I will contact you again upon completion of our evaluation of your request At that time, I will advise you whether any of the for informtion.
mm o
I ww e
Encicsure 3 Page 4 Richard L. Fouke information specified in your request ahich 'is not presently available may ba provided to you.
Sincerely,
'iarjorie B. Ulman Counsel for NRC Staff
Enclosures:
2' 1.
NUREG-0600-l 2.
NUREG-0558 3.
Federal Re ister Notices dated u Tand September 7, 1979 4
NUREG-0578 5.
NUREG-0460.- A r-'-
i cc W/o enclosures: Service List I
l t
/