|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20054G0171982-06-15015 June 1982 Contention 50 Re Brown & Root Deficiencies in Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050J1111982-04-0606 April 1982 Answers to Second & Third Sets of Interrogatories,Questions 29 & 8 Respectively,Re Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20050E2961982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Seventh Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050E2891982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Doherty Sixth Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20050C4211982-04-0202 April 1982 Objections to Request for Admissions.Requests Untimely, Irrelevant to Issues Before ASLB & Extremely & Unduly Burdensome.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4081982-03-31031 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Fifth Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4791982-03-29029 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Jf Doherty Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C5091982-03-26026 March 1982 Response to Jf Doherty 20th & 21st Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0801982-03-25025 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0941982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Second Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0841982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Third Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5481982-03-23023 March 1982 Fourth Set of Requests for Admissions Re Quadrex Rept & Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2351982-03-17017 March 1982 Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2381982-03-15015 March 1982 Sixth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041F0761982-03-10010 March 1982 Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20049J6571982-03-0808 March 1982 Answers to First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1181982-03-0505 March 1982 Third Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Related Correspondence ML20041E1071982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1001982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E0711982-03-0404 March 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 21 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041B5421982-02-17017 February 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20010G0731981-08-24024 August 1981 First Set of Interrogatories Directed to NRC Re Contention 21.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19343B7071980-12-0505 December 1980 Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents from Util on Health Effects of Low Level Radiation.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19340C3141980-11-10010 November 1980 Response to W Schuessler Request for Addl Answers to First Set of Interrogatories.Applicant Is Not in Possession of Data Analyzing Hypothetical Significant Offsite Radiological Releases.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19339C0471980-11-0606 November 1980 Response to W Schuessler Second Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents.Describes Discussions W/Austin County,Tx Sheriff Dept Re Evacuation Analysis. W/Affidavit,Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc ML20008E3971980-10-22022 October 1980 First Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents Directed to E Cumings,R Griffith,L Johnston & R Lemmer Re Consolidated Contention on Effects of low-level Radiation.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20062J4311980-10-20020 October 1980 Informal Request for Addl Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents,In Lieu of Motion to Compel.Includes Second Set of Interrogatories Directed to Util.Related Correspondence ML19347C1851980-10-14014 October 1980 Amended Response to First Set of Interrogatories.Info Includes Identity of Individuals Directing Site Selection. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19332B1801980-09-24024 September 1980 Response to Intervenor Schuessler First Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents. Requested Documents & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19347A6951980-09-22022 September 1980 Response to Fh Potthoff Third Set of Interrogatories.Objects to All Questions Due to Irrelevancy.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19332A8501980-09-0909 September 1980 Further Response to Tx Pirg 16th Interrogatories.Discusses Future Prices of Gas,Nuclear & Coal Energy,Personnel Qualifications,Control Room Design,Safety Relief Valve Setpoints & Hydrogen Explosion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19351D1451980-09-0505 September 1980 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Soliciting Info Re Results of Accident at Site, Emergency Plan & Demographics.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML19344D8731980-08-18018 August 1980 Response to Potthoff Second Set of Interrogatories. Percentage of Electric Generation by Natural Gas Will Be 68% & 21% by 1985 & 1990,respectively.Objects to Remaining Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19327A5091980-08-0101 August 1980 Second Set of Interrogatories Directed to Applicant. Questions Feasibility of Marine Biomass Farm as Alternative to Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19327A5021980-08-0101 August 1980 Response to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories. Intervenor Has No Intention to Call Expert Witnesses at Present Time ML19327A2261980-07-28028 July 1980 Response to Financial Qualifications Intervenors Fourth Set of Interrogatories.Discusses Program Improvements Made as Result of South Tx Project Incidents,Prefiling Package & H Dean Testimony.Affidavit & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19330B2061980-07-25025 July 1980 Response to Jm & M Bishop 800705 Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents.Identifies Witnesses & Summarizes Substance of Testimony.Certificate of Svc & Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19321B2591980-07-25025 July 1980 Response to 800709 Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Includes Info Re Natural Gas Alternative, Conservation & Interconnect,Error in Computer Program & Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19321B2641980-07-25025 July 1980 Response to 800706 Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents.Includes Info Re Movement of Brazos River Toward Proposed Pipeline Route & Max Peak Overpressure for Each Critical Structure.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19330A7151980-07-23023 July 1980 Response to Potthoff First Set of Interrogatories.Objects to Majority of Interrogatories on Basis of Irrelevancy. Applicant Has Not Commissioned Study on Marine Bio Farm Feasibility to Provide Synthetic Gas.W/Certificate of Svc ML19330C5521980-07-0909 July 1980 Response to First Set of Interrogatories.Lists Documents Relied Upon in Study of Effect of Power Transmission Lines on Migratory Waterfowl & Identifies Experts.Affidavit, Resume & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19320C3151980-07-0909 July 1980 Response to Intervenor D Marrack 800508 Interrogatories. Identifies Expert Witnesses Expected to Be Called in Support of Consolidated Rentfro Contention 2.Affidavit & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19320C5611980-07-0909 July 1980 Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Directed to Nrc.Requests Factual Basis of Anticipated Testimony Re Natural Gas Use as Fuel & Subsequent Costs of Electricity.W/Certification of Svc.Related Correspondence ML19320C9271980-07-0909 July 1980 First Set of Interrogatories Directed to Houston Lighting & Power.Requests Factual Info Re U Fuel Sources,Costs,Method of Mining & Stripping,Site & Extent of Mining & Feasibility of Marine Biofarm for Synthetic Natural Gas Supply ML19320C2691980-07-0808 July 1980 Response to Applicant Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Intervenor Pleadings Before ASLB & Aslab.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19330A3501980-07-0808 July 1980 First Set of Interrogatories Directed to NRC Re Financial Qualifications,Hearing Expectation & Witnesses Intended to Be Called ML19330A3421980-07-0808 July 1980 Fourth Set of Interrogatories Directed to Util Re Financial Qualifications.Includes Questions on Disciplinary Actions & Role of Houston Industries.Related Correspondence ML19320C2651980-07-0808 July 1980 Response to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Impact of Transmission Lines & Fes ML19320C2701980-07-0808 July 1980 Response to D Marrack First Set of Interrogatories.Includes Statements Re Transmission Lines & Alternative Transmission Sites & Routes.Prospective Witness Fj Schlight Prof Qualifications,Affidavit & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19330B2091980-07-0606 July 1980 Interrogatories & Request for Documents Directed to Util. Requests Most Recent Population Projection Data & Methodology Used for Updating Projection.Related Correspondence 1982-06-15
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20063N7471982-10-0606 October 1982 Motion for Termination of Proceedings.Util Decided to Cancel Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063N7591982-10-0606 October 1982 Withdrawal of Application for CP ML20055A7221982-07-15015 July 1982 Memorandum & Order Denying Jf Doherty 820615 Submittals, Treated as Motion to Reconsider ASLB 820602 Order.Motion Untimely Filed & Failed to Show Significance or Gravity of Issues ML20055A3551982-07-12012 July 1982 Amended Contention 59.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L4521982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Fails to Establish Timeliness &/Or Significance of Issues Sought to Be Raised.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5531982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Should Be Considered Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 820602 Order.Timeliness & Significance of Issues Not Established.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054J9371982-06-28028 June 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Request to Reopen Record. Request Improper & Insufficient to Support Relief.Commission Rules Cannot Be Circumvented by Refiling Same Argument After ASLB Ruling Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9861982-06-15015 June 1982 Motion to Reopen Record to Take Evidence on Contention 59. Gravity of Issues Warrants Reopening ML20054G0171982-06-15015 June 1982 Contention 50 Re Brown & Root Deficiencies in Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0861982-05-24024 May 1982 Response in Opposition to Util 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations.Contention Should Be Treated as Such,Not as Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20052H8621982-05-19019 May 1982 Motion to Strike J Doherty Reply to Applicant 820507 Response to Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58. Commission Rules Do Not Allow Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052H4441982-05-14014 May 1982 Reply Opposing Applicant 820507 Response to J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Contention Should Be Admitted W/Amends.Aslb Should Judge Conduct of Applicants. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F3121982-05-0707 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention Re Alleged Failure to Rept Design Defects.Substantively, Motion Is Motion to Reopen Record & Stds Have Not Been Met. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052D1221982-04-29029 April 1982 Findings of Fact on Supplemental Issues to Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4541982-04-22022 April 1982 Submittal of Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations at Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E0561982-04-21021 April 1982 Supplemental Findings of Fact on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050J1111982-04-0606 April 1982 Answers to Second & Third Sets of Interrogatories,Questions 29 & 8 Respectively,Re Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20050E2961982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Seventh Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050E2891982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Doherty Sixth Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20050C4211982-04-0202 April 1982 Objections to Request for Admissions.Requests Untimely, Irrelevant to Issues Before ASLB & Extremely & Unduly Burdensome.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4081982-03-31031 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Fifth Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4791982-03-29029 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Jf Doherty Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042C6181982-03-29029 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820315 Motion for ASLB to Subpoena Quadrex Corp Employee Witnesses as ASLB Witnesses. Request Is Based on Misperception of Scope of Reopened Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6431982-03-29029 March 1982 Motion for ASLB to Call DE Sells as Witness for Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Testimony Needed to Explain Why NRC Did Not Immediately Obtain Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5091982-03-26026 March 1982 Response to Jf Doherty 20th & 21st Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20042C5201982-03-25025 March 1982 Motion to Compel Discovery from Applicant & to Postpone Evidentiary Presentations at 820412 Hearings.Applicant Objections to Interrogatories Unsupported & Necessitate Hearings Be Delayed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0671982-03-25025 March 1982 Reply to Tx Pirg 820315 Addl Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0801982-03-25025 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5481982-03-23023 March 1982 Fourth Set of Requests for Admissions Re Quadrex Rept & Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0841982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Third Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0941982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Second Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A4791982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearings.Sufficient Grounds Not Provided to Justify Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2351982-03-17017 March 1982 Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2381982-03-15015 March 1982 Sixth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042B2451982-03-15015 March 1982 Motion for Subpoena of Quadrex Corp Employees.Testimony Necessary for Clear Understanding of Brown & Root Deficiencies Despite Util Supervision & Specific Steps Needed to Correct & Prevent Problems.W/Certificate of Svc ML20041F0761982-03-10010 March 1982 Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041F0871982-03-10010 March 1982 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearing on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Addl Time Needed to Complete Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049J6571982-03-0808 March 1982 Answers to First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1001982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1071982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1181982-03-0505 March 1982 Third Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Related Correspondence ML20041E1201982-03-0505 March 1982 Motion for Order Directing Applicant to Provide Forthcoming Bechtel Quadrex Rept Review.Rept Pertinent to Remaining Issue.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041E1741982-03-0505 March 1982 Brief Opposing R Alexander Appeal from ASLB 820112 Order Denying Petition to Intervene.Aslb Did Not Abuse Discretion in Denying Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E0711982-03-0404 March 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 21 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20049H8881982-03-0101 March 1982 Response Opposing D Marrack 820213 Motion for Review of Dates for Reopening Hearings & Continuance.No Commission Regulations or Atomic Energy Act Provisions Require Applicant Irrevocable Commitment.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5381982-02-22022 February 1982 Reply to Intervenors Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041C0671982-02-22022 February 1982 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 820209 Motion for Addl Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law.Motion Mooted by Tx Pirg Filing Proposed Findings on 820212. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5421982-02-17017 February 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1982-07-02
[Table view] |
Text
--
o
~
i
,z,y,, , . -
kj;g ; g', > s.r:
.)
rI~ 12.T.2. %b s(7 '.
< l s *.
s n rr
. 4, e , s r ql1 8., T. ~iG* c ,9..ae j n I U', % .T"T
. - "- T. d-N1' Ih O I bl.k bOM OE b[ . -, -
- > .,} . f} C f, wG g i ,s -e i .
- h r r. m v1. 7. p y ,17 w3 y p;(pwJ. U: ,a: w' L. )
.i
, , . .a. *A 1\ .
f.
- k. /Lb C Ilf !m. f C C
- ' O., ' l 's .i j f.
5 's ' {. '
- ~ b i1 a .PB Q. -
.t ,.f.{.
E(
4 s. J ? vQ f. 4.L(1 a ,?'1.!T.
.4 ; f a j
'.'4 (ilt T?
s t se (1 '
4 'E ,
,U c o oqs.; p y>bL ' ,3
_- 't 'q t.-.
f' 1- -31.m,r i. g ) .i' ' '_h
. . l
<.c.
.; 7.
. g.. f } u .U.. .. , 3 nOL. 16 v3_3. r.v ,. .f%. o
- oka
- 1 II. s 7w , 7.1. ..* ?. u eT
- U .i, J; o.,j,,l .i l. ,') Ue - l'r ( 3
. . i n "L
. r 0. . -+I i >7.fl :as 6. .:c*.c-'I o'
' ' <v - ' ,s,.
e u1+ t a,4. ~nr .1. ;i p. ; ., *.e U. r-: -i v+t E.i. a._1 -(_.i. il t)3 v g2. v p U gf. Ar.no r, , - 3,-
.*).-
e .3
-Ph.
v es,, .c t ,
, a _
i 3 ,
- t. !.* f0 .. .. ,. a. .,, . '.v 3. v. ,7, ..i . 3 .. l ,, ,,
. . . ~
a%, r La rr
.~1.,>,,t s 3
,.~r; g ,,.c ,
,3c..
,3
2
&k. . \ !. s e -
F. C3,
-' I e>. -
s".as 2.,. s.
(. [ ( ; s . * .e r ' sx( '.- ,er? rat6. ,c. r.a
.) 7 a. ,w, . s . r,
- v. j.3.3 J es p. i*;,,. nn .. x s 9'.
.t y {. '.lt .s.. .. a.., g. w nsn.s k.s t * .,1 s >7 s - .+ . . .
o
-.u ',l O 2sr ") .} s3 i -us - .i .a y L,; N + - -
- > r, p. . tv. ,;7 rr p- .1.s.+ s_
Ai~ Ln, 1 -C t}t o
u U.1.w,.G L1 L v. ,r..
.a
, } (- r
. ...A- 1 . c. . t vu u, .y m., 1,e amacy , .w,, . .
, c
- , . , T (,i
-p- g ,~; , , .m v, G 3 o7 .;g< o.
ns. ( , y, ..
L. . , -,,, -
I 3o 5. 1 n O a . 4 s.,
- 7. . . .u . vat ,.4. Ja.u.t . .l f.<.~ .- .y
-c. ;y 1 ss
.s. L 3
. i 5), . J> t)n .,1s es,,, un, p.
- n , e l. .. u ,
. . ~ .
- c. . ,-rs ,-n. >. .c:a,, , ,
2-o . . .]. .s.t~~. ." " n i c .i P. .
f 800314Otoe ** Of l
7 f'
.. EIGHTH .SIF OF IUTERP.00 Atones
- 1. With respectato: control' room dis 19 aya for valvec or other manually operated bremotely contre 13e .nctru:rsata at Allons Creek:
Areltheris any signals ...; vinual indlcators in the control roon
.in which changco of. disp 1cy status .:31gniDj changen in control netuation
> a16na rather than :nges in functional atatua of the valve
'or, instrument?
.2. (u) If the answeri:to- #1.is "yes", s tate which controla are involved and ?thefrolationdhip. of thete controle to t_he safety of the plant; f(h) If;thn.annuer!to #1 in Uno" lict and produce any and all documents which confirm tha't nnew:fr; (c) If HLP ia unabic to determine the aprecise- ausser to #1 nt thic time, - atate to what extent' the matter raised in #1 ha been considered by li1ER ard/or its vendors up to
-thin-time, Ls The following interrogatei'iec releri- to control room design for Allena Creek:
(a)llIs there a disp 1gyed indicatima 0f flow through the relief valve-dicchargo line? T.f "yes", lia0 and produce any documents which confirm that2 answer.
(b) "'Till the abacnce or extinguichxni of a signal or vieual in-Tdication be~used to denoto e 'go s ecA', ' r c ady,, ' 'in-toleranco, ' or l 2' completion condition' for e.ny instrumeata? If "yes," state saat
[ 1displayc are, involved,
! (c) -Is there u. displayed. indien. tion or alarn to indicato whether the emergency feedwater cyctem la:in a 'nicaligned or inoperative
- ctatun?. Ia:there a displayed indication of energency feedwater flow
'to the_.nteam generator?
{d)-Are tho' indicator lighta for emergency feedwater control valven - ' located in a cloco and conciatent juxtaposition to
, :their"accociated controlo?. List end produce documents consulted in
- enowering thia ~ question, (c)!How much.. panel space (in oquare fact). will exist ?'
Provide ionlapprosinstion, if'preciae figure :13' not kaown.
L(f)1Eow many. controla ;will- exist? Hon raany displayc? ..How many-Lintegratedicontrol/ display arrangementa?f~How many annunciators?
y(g)' 31111Jthere lbeia.; plant :TV monitor?
(li):Now manycCRT'atin (the. control roca?
~
L . .
4 5
' - - ~ --
m
~ '
$g$; ~ :j.. ,.,
~
e .-- ,
_ a.
- 2..
,3 & >
.n f(1): Thef followinMakteL to '"F:chibit' I" of Appendix 1 attached:
i(1):'Dossi thafd': gram chov the bacic : shape of the primary ,
A ~
7 control room?? (2) *:f(."no"' tot that question, what -is inaccurate
^
about'ithendiagrari! c(3) 'If ' Hyes" to= that question, provide -
Lthe 'diriensionniali:.m by :"A " and "P,"i inithe diagram * .
~
) [(;])LIsEthc7 primary cdtrol room designed for single - ~
. operator 1 monitoring during aormal cperation?- If "no,".how many
.. operators?.
i(khIhiring. control rocc monitoring,-what is the maximum viewing
- distance = and the maximum waT.ingLdistance?-
I(1),iIsithe contr'ol roomis emergency overhead lighting of equal'
~
strengthiand; chine; to normaliighting? State the basis for that
' answer.:
f(m)J Will meters have ith5ral' energency backlighting?
(n)L Uill auditory 'd'isp1t/s ascociated with annunciators utilize
' directional; propertice to uns, tot operators in locating the alarming Lannunciators?? 'If "y'es," statt se extent and nature cf. euch direct 3 cnal properties..
'(o)JW111 -there be unifort nandardo for connon operating irodes
~
'of differentJ controls 1(e.g.,- 01:centrols turn " clockwise" to change -
Jiom' i s!2 " manual'f to"dutomatic")?: For s/nat types of common operating modes will such constant modo ac1cetion cris+? ~
_ l(p)1WillLiralves une diaMays t:hich shot the . " distance .. traveled"- or .
"percsnt ;open":Lin orderEto._ allow cperatorc to . fine tune. valvoiposition-sin /g?(
(q) Isithere an'annunciaiorffor reactor. trip?
.(r)I 2 Will thelLdisplayssliclude moving-pointer, arc-schle vertical indicators? : 1Which1 of the ;1011cring control units .will' include such (indicators:1 reactor core coolitg; reactor control;: nuclear system:
z y , ; protection; recirenlation;[leakdge andL CAN;' CKD l control?. ~
2(a)j:OfMhe"indicatbratmentionedjin (r) above, how many will b'e, 1
" flocated higher %thant:six t feetifrori :the-floor? THo'wimany3will be located:
[lii'gher3hanksevenifeet from1th_ef fl.cor??L Uhi_ch[systemb contain those'.
~
c_ findicators?: ? t
'I y f(t)). Ofdhe 'ihdlcators ;mentionedfin (r); ab'ove, jliow ' manyfwil.1; _
q D use^almirroredkscale diatefand/or["crition1 alarms"'whichgidentify .
f 6$ 1tleal Or[dcgradingjconditions@.
- [' L 5 ,
q J A g , _
Iir @ .:_.- r ? ,. .
v W_ - ,
- _ h';
.~ ~
I' . .
d
- 3 s 3.-
~
l(u)M1111 there lie ahdisplayed indication when Ithe core system
~
reachesisaturation~ condition? If- not, how will the control room
^ , .operatoriblc_ expected: to infer such conditions' existence?
+
- -(v)?Will the-control. room use vertical panels,behind . the .
- benchboard;.t'o support primaryloperations? How many displays will
~
=
Ebo71'ochted on the panels?: How liigh are the vertical panels mounted?
' f(w.)EAre2there any, o~perating controls for which meters must be read yhi'
- performingLthe operation? Indicate which control room
[systemsicontain'suchMoontr01s?
n 1
(x) Ie. itherejassurancer that- all such meters in (w) above are
. facing 'in aLdirect manner the asnociated centrols? How is assurance
, l maintained that an. operator does not have to leave his controls'to
[ rend (theiappropriatemeter?
- '(y) What sisc lettering will be used on labeling? Are labels' lettering.sise different depending upon the height or distance of the -display from the' normal position of the operator?
.(c) Does Applicant intend to use ayhten or function demarcation zlines -cad labels on control paneln?
4.? The followingl questions also rolnte to contrcl room design at Allens Creek:-
-(a);Will the control room displays use colcr coding?
~
[(b)JIf (a)R is "yes," the follot ing pertahr to the color coding
- system: (1)(W111 ore meaning per color' he utill::cd?- If not, state
.how many;[ meanings'-per color may he'used? (2) How many colored lights -
.vilf bo1used?.(3) Will meter faces tc color coded?
(c)LWill-
. threc2pccition swi bches or "j-handles"' be
, : used in which!the icontrol must be ple.ced in the "ctart". pcsition end held ;therc ~until;ithe' mechanism starti? State which controls < vill
- use'such' design,-
+
d Are?codtrols for borated waber stonage' tank and high pressure
('.) s
.$njictionilocatcOin:continguousjeatticnn?- If act, state how far
^apartM;heDtwoi.codtrols Eare? -
~
f(e} %at is $theieriterlafde:bereiningz wliat -information 1willibe?
^
[: , $p1hoedfonitho : computer printout anD hen hhcLir202 ration will be. ~
~
Spiintid loutf-l 4
dfhLihihatL. manner is? documentation of Sprc~c.edures;made - availa K z. ?
MD operators.
fin l the f controli rcomlduring nornial s and c emergencyf operation? -
[{1.; \._ g , J-~ >
, r
- l ]'Jl + ~-c' * ' ' ^
, , ,i S ' .;
f:% ' ' . , ' .
+
I- 'y
{ -- ' f Yh a: *
- ,j
h" k< ' ;h.;
t + .
g p <g
, v ,
's 'W
<, "W ; ;c _ ,;
', - k. c3 -
- s
~
, ', < J5NIioes :HI&P havchthe _ following document in~ it a possession: UUMAH-UFACTORSiREVIEW UF$HUCLEAR-POWER:FIANT-00lITROL, ROOM DESIGH,-EPRI
% ~ 7,[' 4p; k . Seminsrap. Gondalez, andrFarsons,'Loekheed Missles & Space
- (Co.,fMovM19767 lIfnso', t m- 'please produce that document,
= . .m .
i6,;fIs ;the ACHGSL control room designed so. that operators -at the South
[' '
.TcNashPifoject canLbs3ransferred Lthere? If s'o, state the: manner in-
&hicidcompadbility ~
betweenithe two designs is.t " 4W i maintained..
i .- 17. Whichivendor11s' designing thelACHGS control room? List other i " j @ Jnuclear poner plant: control- roomaLdesigned by that vendor.
-8, What isiHI&P's role in the designing of the control room? Has
?HI2iP p10ced constraints 2 coat, schedule, parel arrangement, 'overall
~
' layout, orforganication.offdisplays--on the designer of the control room? Describe' generally ony such constraints.
. 9 51n1 der.igning thoicontro1L roon, 'is HIaP or a vendor evaluating experience:of operators.at other-GE nuclear facilitics?' Has HI&P' iand/oryvendor; evaluated. the extent to whidi control operators at .
J those ciher facilities placcinew labels or-tagc on controls.-or dis--
^
' plays? If'so jhow many. changes ' did operators r:ake in :labelitig Tof the" control' room 1 displays in those: plants?
} L10/ Duringfthe design proccas for- the control room panels, were alterna-
- tive
- penel configurations ; taken into: consideration? If. so, : what were1tl e~ principle factorsi nsed in chlecting the final cond guration?
, 111.4Inithe; control' room, how many phyaically' separate control:
'sanelsiare-there?. Consider each geoisetricichange a separate panel.
~
c[12 win the control n room, how. are multiple, -sinc 1taneous. alarms ato]bbhan'dled; by?the operator? ' Are alarma ceded by their7 severity?
s 513JArA a11Jcontrol; room Einstruments capabic of measuring;orfindicating O, ., +donditionsvwhichfare ' -
beyond?the limitscof conditionsiexpeeted' _
, J 7 l'id(n30 sign [basisinccident?! What criterialis .Ined in placling ' limitations N_~ .-
forfo.dtarhbounds onLcalibrStion andirieasuremenivalues?!
Np /14WI6what? ways are ' operator erro' retaken ir.tolaccountJin . design :
w e .
~ ? N f[t'h[ co$tio'liroom?
A i c , j., . d5%HnveW : :;any;of Jthe~ follcVing bconipsrformed :indhe? design of-m . l rnom63(a))draftingta;sctSoffoperater g , e( Stheicimt,rol -
o .
A SV Tprocedures;-
7:q l mf. -(b)e[o: domp1 sty. analysis (.ofntacks . ~ .. ~ .~. ~
' operatorcamust4 perform, Lincliiding
-~:4 + ltime}11mits,itypes fofninstrumentiiniicrfaces, NHc.;1(c),in. setlof?
g .. ;~ ,
. ,n ..
4 JV 2humanfengineeringf critsrinid.etermined; [(~d) / analysis ofH failure? ,
% (; . V -
m m
% wM R_ , 1, ' ' ?C"7 w s .
~^ ~
- . s - +
b -wOu. ;~;^ .n w T .
+ -
c ,
- i
~
gif y- ,
L
- n : J ,;
3: z.; y
~
. . .- ~ 5. :
_E :
X~ $l -
imodecland f analyaoc/Inui-L trecogelevant to' . operator . errorn? Produco n.. 1 1-/do6umentu' cited;1nstheenswer.
. - ~. -
,.y 36.EUpdateitho powor ?i:t 7 t erthary.eitaVJ e shown in Exhibit II of
? %s>p,endlyattaclied. jidenc' LiwovidcJfigurca up_ to thin year).
~
2 17 s What%1aithe 'recervWm:n t.i.f for the ' Enc 0T region? In particular, J fian?t itstruel.ftnat EROWIcb.9ted S a ienerva inargin of. over 37 T.i
" ^
Sin 1979?: T(Figures f uced hert we for reacrvo' at peak). -
- 18.iBow manrconcrete voldo g'
- Southh Texas Projoct' have been found
- inj980?[NhatJia1thejjize (dinensione) ~of' the largent. void? Produce '
rtheinrbun MRootinurvey which ^found thoce voida, 'Preduce all'documento
~o
}in.'lil&P'n1 possennio'n!w'alcli rd ate 'to thin interrogatory..
- 19.intw HI&P received Ld citanon f;.om the URo for a bulge in the
,a tool -liner' of! 'tho ; containmor - :ni;. ding at South Texna Projoct? Wen
- sas: that ' bulge reported to tly lRCP my was the citation inaued?
kPrdduselallh documenth relatins to th3n -interrogatory.
?20i State rthe. ' dates :fot each olf the incidento mentioned in #19 and #18 above infuhich:i(a) ~ the deficircy wen found by the Appliennt or-l11rown EnRoot and[(b)'.the' doficicncy isc reported to the NRC.
~
!21~.j!!iak criteria d&dfNI&P use ~in beleating. Ebacco oc the. Architect c Lfor/ACNGS?((
s 5
9
,^-.
s
".5
^t y
1 J r a W. -~ k
. ~
s ..'e '
g f e - **'
( ^* L'
+
7; . <
, [ [,
, p
- 3;y
~
_' / ;
, 8:~ , a >
~
I- k ' e i.- S s e : ._ L
,i[. I.s .
4W-s
...,4 e , , ,
. _' :l ' " l j^ , --
c- ,
A -? ~ ~ * ,
, ; _ _t
l'XHI B/ T .T I
A I
i 1
1 g
I I B
[XH/l$1T $
TABLE 3 POWER INTERCIIANCE( )
(MW11)
Year ' Interchange 1976 +1,817, 1975- -595 1974 1973 -109,859 1972 -43,102
- 1971 +7,366 1970. -6,058
- f(1) . . Power interchange. represents the power flow tollIL&P from the l~
Texas; Interconnected System as a difference between the actual
. MWii received-and the actual MWil delivered, not including the purchases or sales included in?the response provided by the previous:two tables. - A (+) indicates net gain to IIL&P's system l and a (-)_ depicts a net loss.
i .
c,_ Sil-101c -
jQ n tivpixI f
, . -