ML19309F627

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations & Deviations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-269/79-37,50-270/79-34 & 50-287/79-37
ML19309F627
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/07/1980
From: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Parker W
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML19309F629 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004300205
Download: ML19309F627 (2)


See also: IR 05000269/1979037

Text

.

. _ .

.

. _ -

g#

S

!

o$

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

800480 #

REGION 11

0

-

r#

-

101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100

o

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303

.....

APR 071980

In Reply Refer To:

RII:DRQ

50-269/79-37

50-270/79-34

50-287/79-37

Duke Power Company

Attn:

W. O. Parker, Jr.

-

Vice President, Steam Production

Post Office Box 2178

Charlotte, NC 28242

Gentlemen:

Thank you for your letter of March 3,1980, informing us of steps

you have taken to correct an item of noncompliance concerning

activities under NRC Operating License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47 and

DPR-55 brought to your attention in our letter of February 6,1980.

We will examine your corrective actions with respect to this item

of noncompliance during subsequent inspections.

In your letter,

you also took exception to certain items identified in our letter.

In answer to your response to Item A. of the Notice of Violation,

we conclude that the loss of power to the KI Bus does constitute

a specific and foreseen potential malfunction of a system.

3

failures of non-nuclear instrumentation (NNI) and/or integrated

Similar

l

control system (ICS) power have occurred in the past, at Oconee

as well as other Babcock and Wilcox designed facilities, which have

led to transient situations involving loss of adequate information

.

to the operator.

In light of the previous documented experience

>

[

with this loss of power problem and the potential severity of the

p

consequences, it is our position that an adequate Emergency Procedure

'

should have been provided prior to the November 10, 1979, event.

Therefore, our position on Item A. of the Notice of Violation remains

{

unchanged and the item remains an item of noncompliance.

However, no further response to this item is necessary as your letter

outlined the corrective actions you plan to take.

We will examine

those corrective actions and plans with respect to the item of

noncompliance during subsequent inspections.

In answer to your response to the Notice of Deviat-ion dealing with

prompt NRC notification, we believe the requirements of IE Bulletin

79-05B are explicitly clear in this area.

It is our position that

mer

.

-

_ _______ _

.

,

,

.

APR 0 7 ;33g

.>

Duke Power Company

-2-

that Oconee Unit 3 was not in a controlled or expected condition of

operation during the transient event which occurred on November 10, 1979.

Due to the combination of a lack of adequate plant status.information

available to the operator and the lack of an adequate Emergency Proce-

dure for this malfunction, the operators were not able to fully cope with

the event in a safe manner. Although it is acknowledged that the

operators took cetion during the early phase of the transient, it is

also noted that the Reactor Coolant System cooldown limits were exceeded

during the recovery phase as a result of equipment responding in an

uncontrolled and unpredicted manner.

Therefore, our position on the

Notice of Deviation remains unchanged and the Deviation remains as

originally identified.

Your procedures should be revised as necessary to assure notification of

NRC within one hour of the start of any future similar type occurrences,

as required by 10 CFR 50.72.

Therefore, we request that, with regard to

this deviation, that you provide us in writing within 20 days of our

receipt of this letter your comments including a description of cor-

rective actions that have been or will be taken by you, and the cor-

rective actions which will be taken to avoid further deviations and

the date correcitve actions were or will be completed.

Should you desire further discussion of this matter we will be happy

to arrange a meeting at a mutually convenient time in our Atlanta Offices.

We appreciate your cooperation with us.

Sincerely,

- .

James P. O'Reilly

Director

cc:

J. E. Smith

Station manager

Post Office Box 1175

Seneca, SC 29678

h

,

t

1

'd