ML19309A381
| ML19309A381 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 04/15/1974 |
| From: | Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Mattimoe J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309A374 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003270832 | |
| Download: ML19309A381 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000312/1974002
Text
3,
-
g
. .
.
u
,
UNITED STATES
-
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSlQN
g
eenscionars or asoutarony oesnavions
,4
J,
messon v
.
,
,
- . ::=:: r ;; c
,g
r m er.r.uren- 1 ==
-
__
-
_
P.
N
c
setragy,
3
gg) ,y,y
APR 151974
.
1
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Docket No. 50-312
P. 0: Box 15830
Rancho Seco Nuclear
Sacramento, California 95813
Generating Station
- Attention:
Mr. John J. Mattimoe
Assistant General Manager
Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. A. D. Johnson of this
office on March 4-5, 11-13, 18-20 and 22, 1974 of activities authorized
by AEC Construction Permit No. CPPR-56 and to the discussion of our
findings held by Mr. Johnson with Mr. John J. Mattimoe and other members
of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
'
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed
inspection report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of
selective examinations of procedures and representative re. ards, inter-
views with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
No violations of AEC requirements were identified within the r ..).' of
this inspection.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the AEC's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and
the enclosed inspection report will-be placed in the AEC's Public
,
'
Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe
to be proprietary, it is necessary that you submit a written application
to this office, within 20 days of the date of this letter, requesting
that such information be withheld from public disclosure. The applica-
tion must include a full statement of the reasons why it is claimed that
the information is proprietary. The application should be prepared so
that any proprietary information identified is contained in an enclosure
{
to the application, since the application without the enclosure will
'
also be placed in the Public Document Room.
If we do not hear from you
in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in
j
the Public Document Room.
i
'
'..
s
.,
.
s
c
,
'
N2
8003270
.
--
,
, , - , , . -
- - , ,
- , -
, . - , , ,
.
- _
_
_
..
, . .
. . .
.
'
..
,
.
.
.
.
,
-
.:
l
-
-
.
.,
.
,
1
'
Sacramento Municipal
.
l
Utility District
-2-
.
-
,.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be
glad to discuss thest with you.
.
Sincerely,
,
i
N d tigneil by
R. k bMilan
Director
.
~
.
Enclosure:
RO Inspection Report No. 50-312/74-02
cc w/o enclosure:
R. J. Rodriquez, SMUD
)
,
L. G. Schwieger, SlWD
i
l
bec w/o enclosure:
RO Chief, FS&EB
vROIliQ (4)
Directorate of Licensing (4)
RO Files
i
DR Central Files
'
!
)
-
,
e
e
i
!
.*
e
-
I
.,