ML19295E406
| ML19295E406 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000452, 05000453 |
| Issue date: | 11/10/1980 |
| From: | Holloway C NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17150A120 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-80-536 NUDOCS 8011240002 | |
| Download: ML19295E406 (1) | |
Text
p-wa b N3 DISTRIBUTION:
License Fee File w/ encl. 3
{! '
LFMB Manpower File w7e99 s.
Docket Files STN 50-EG & 559 w/ enc 1. 3
. h s 7. % h3 l W{.
1 L
CJHolloway, LFMB!w/ enc]J 3
}
g N.
QDiggs,LFMBw/oencht.
KLKohler, LFMB w/ encl.W3 f
LRiB R/F '(2) w/ encl. 3-D**
1 Il
. Coupe, LFMB w/ encl.'*3 j
~.
. _ y
.b b
5
- b NOV 10 ISSO MEMORANDUM FOR
Files y
y THRU:
. William O. Miller, Chief License Fee Management" Branch',' ADM FROM:
C. James Holloway, Jr, Assistant Chief, License Fee Management Branch, ADM
SUBJECT:
GREENWOOD 2 & 3 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REVIEW COSTS By letter dated June 4; 1973, Detroit Edison Company filed a construction permit application with the Commission to build two nuclear power plants in St. Clair County, Michigan. The plants were designated as the Greenwood Energy Center, Units 2 and 3.
Ort July 9,1980, Detroit Edison submitted its " Request for Withdrawal of Applf-cation" for Greenwood 2 & 3 (Enclosure 1) with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (ASLBP) and by order dated July 14, 1980, the ASLBP dismissed the proceeding (Enclosure 2).
In accordance with LFMB estaS11shed guidelines concerning the assessment of
-fees for withdrawn applications, we have reviewed the costs incurred'by the various program offices from the date the. application was fiTed to the date of withdrawal of the application. EncTosure 3 is a stomary of the review costs as well as the supporting documentation fron the program offices. Enclosure 3 shows that there was $478,091 expended for the review of Greenwood:and $9,200 expended for the review of Greenwood 3.
The application was filed and reviewed by the Connission as a custon design.
Therefore, for purposes of assessing the costs of the Greenwood 2 & 3 review, we consider the CP fees in 10,CFR 170.21 A.1 as the maximum allowable for -
recovery. The maximum that can be assessed for the review of Greenwood 2 is
$T,069,000 ($125,000 + $944,000). The maximum to be assessed fon the review of Greenwood 3 is $174,000.- Since the costs of the review for both units are less than the maximum allowed, then $478,091 would be applicable to Unit 2 and $9,200 would be applicable to Unit 3.
The total applicable under the Comission's regulations for both units is $487,291. Since Detroit Edison paid an application fee of $70,000, this amount would be deducted from the total of $487,291 leaving a balance due of $417,291 for review of the Greenwood 2 & 3 application. We plan to: notify the Office of ControTler to bill Detroit Ed.ison for the Conmission's cost of reviewing the withdrawn application.
y, g OCQ YEca c. James mumy, Jr.' I C. Ju.xa ' olio a;, Jr., A; W tr.t Chd ef
...... lice.n.se. F. 5 e.g.g.n.a.g.e.me.n.t Ma tranch
......................~....................
g g
g
/
h YEquEffToTTurMIH5ET6r7 --- -- - - hJDM -- -
LFM9i DM~ % t:FMS:*eM. -
bkH NWM-.- W).V....
.......sf..Procee d 4 n as- ~~.....
- -.-~.--
,m s'G--.
y
.m v
! rec m,/3, %nm/W Termination.gpf Pyneeding,,,
4%,7,;"...
- " : / "
'"/u-l 2
ar,nr.cne+,,na c..nnn +<nn nn,.. _ +,+<nn
N g
ww
,k 1
Ustmo i
LESo cu r, LAM e, LcleY & M ACRA 9 U010G80 * 'h
~
1333 Ncw HAMPss Ac AVENUC, N. W.
r-1 Offi:3 f S2 C -
,p/
WAS HIN GTO N, D. C. 2 O O 3 6 y
r.. - c.
s-e.. - -
i s*.
p
'CLEP=omt aca es F 7sc o
,, - -f
. /
CacLC Apostas LEON A. a L L C N. sm.
Came C mC N F.maemat a m aW O aw La U F, J a.19 2 9 a a r, Llew'. wa8 8*
- 470m ' 0.
sCSCP= C maCMCLDCm,2 Cau t mC N F wae ma t,2 a
'moman a, um a es 3a.e C m M C ET S. S a 6L Am O.J a.
GCmano A.meanCm vgLCa amotta G. S.
- C' C m s t m O E N a 4MCILA M. Mam S Ma LL AON #a N C. LCIS T 19 $ 2 *19 7 6 GCCFFmV Q.C gggy gamC3 p, Mggam M C my, gg,.g f (L R COP 4m DawlO 8 elCa s
- MILIP *aL= C m weGurG AN
- avbCm 4 entoog C. CL LSwC mTM mc M CEN,2 203 *S7 79a3 e.O e mCAOwaf CaadLCS N.aumOCm WILLIA" 3. MCm misCN mew VCan,q.v.scoes TMouas C. sumMC wamv CT A. waart s wlL Liam a.CAmNAMAN*
JAMEI O M ALL ET.J A-g T CLCpmC8e C 2 9 3
- 4 9 9* 4 tQ tie s c an N S.CaaSC entaN O. ON CILL
- a CASLC AOpmCSS eCG Cm O. rCLowaN *a J. MlCMACL maassw b E E*"8e"E* 'O84 CuGCNC m. FID C LL *a JCMN C meCwamCSON &
sACCS FalCCLANQCm IIbN#M w "C8CNELATT TELEJu aa3*44 ANCatw GANSSCmG sOMM A. m u' cT O*8^#E" d*' e lC R J G Cmam Q GBCmOANC mat
.SCOGNAMIGuo
- ? StamCLCY souamC DomaLC J.GmCCNC
"^ " " ^; * " " ",n *
- Uv" M O L.*f2ELCT a
' e = ~ I' ==== c~a'^~a 3
- 30uou, 3
-a LCvC N G.3 iNMCm T ELC -CN C es... m.
,, a. C,
sO = C a~ s =Ta^u = =
sulv 9, 1980 TCta.....
Camb o. -C.CL,eam miCmACL*CYCNMQ Cu" CMC G
S. T MCMA S. s m.
- a sAmCS F..C oe N SO N, am LCONanc
- m. TmCSTEN *e acNALD D. SONES Mammy M. volGT *a JamCS a.LAPCNN 4.mICMAmo waCMTCL GmaNT 3. L C w t S GCmano
- p. WATSON
- t an ea wCCO Lov CJCT TMOMAS A. 2ttam M CS aC C H T DamTN Cm 3 WA SM8NGTON OF FIC C eCSiOCNT SamTNta$ LONDON CFFICC a aOwlfTED TO TMC OtStmlCT OF COLuwsea sam Elizabeth S.
Bowers, Esq.
Dr. Richard F. Ccle Chairman, Atomic Safety Atomic Safety and Licensing and Licensing Board Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S.
Nuclear R'egulatory Cc=is sion Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washing cn, D.C.
20555 Dr. Walter H.
Jordan 881 W.
Outer Drive Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Re:
The Detroit Edison Company (Greenwood Energy Center, Units 2 and 3) Docket Nos. 50-452 and 50-453
Dear Madam and Sirs:
On June 16, 1980, I wrote to advise you that The Detroit Edison Company
(" Applicant") was considering whether it would be appropriate to withdraw its Applica-tion for Licenses in this proceeding and request that the proceeding be terminated.
Applicant has now made a final decision to ask that the proceeding be terminated.
I am enclosing a formal request for withdrawal of application, which is subject to the approval of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board under 10 C.F,.R. S 2.107.
I SO3
't) e a-i
~ j' p'/
S 8 0 0 714 0 Do
Elizabeth S.
Bowers, Esq.
Dr. Richard F. Cole Dt. Walter H. Jordan July 9, 1980 Page 2 It is respectfully requested that the Licensing Board issue an order granting Applicant's request for withdrawal and terminating the proceeding without preju-dice.
Pending action by the Licensing Board, it is further requested that the time for Applicant to respond to the motion served on June 2, 1980, by Citizens for Employment and Energy be extended.
If the Licensing Board acts favorably upon the request for withdrawal, it is our position that the motien will be moot so far as Applicant is concerned.
Very truly yours,
/2)
A MW Enclosure cc w/ enc.:
Frank G.
Gia=brene, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Stephen M. Schinki, Esq.
Peter A. Marquardt, Esq.
Mr. Arthur Robertsen Citizens for Employment und Energy Mr. Robert Magnuson Dr. Robert G. Asperger Ms. Bertha A. Daubendiek Docketing and Service Sectio.t
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCMMISSION BEFORE THE ATCMIC SAFC.? AND LICENSING 3 CARD In the Matter of
)
)
THE DETROIT EDISCN CCMPANY )
Docket Nos. 50-452 50-453
)
(Greenwood Energy Centar,
)
Units 2 and 3)
)
REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATICN Cn March 24, 1980, the Board of Directors of The Detroit Edison Company (" Detroit Edison"J announced their decision to cancel plans to construct two nuclear power Given the sub-reactors at the Greenwood Energy Center.
stantial uncertainties now associated with building and licensing a new nuclear power cl m t, the Greenwcod units can no longer be expected to be completed as scheduled or within current estimates of tost.
Therefore, Detroit Edison has decided that to continue with the design and engineering of the units wculd not be a prudent allocation of its resources.
Detroit Edison filed its application for licenses to use and operate the Greenwood nuclear construct, possess, units on June 4, 1973.
A notice of hearing on the application was published on October 30, 1973.
38 Fed. Reg. 29,908.
DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously entered into system under:
[_
ANO N o.
of pages:
-