ML19291D042
| ML19291D042 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000580, 05000581 |
| Issue date: | 11/10/1980 |
| From: | Holloway C NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17150A120 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-80-536 NUDOCS 8011240009 | |
| Download: ML19291D042 (1) | |
Text
.
,$t ECoupe, LFMB w/ encl.
DISTRIBUTION:
KLKohler, LFMB-
^
License fee File 2/ encl.
w/ encl. 4
- Docket Files STN 50- mn & 581 w/ encl.
tiEHORMDUM FOR: Files NOV 10 1980 LFMB Manpower File w/en'cl.
CJHolloway, LFMB w/ enc % 4 William O. Miller. Chief. License fee.'98a'gMtY0an*cYh THRU:
FROM:
C. James Holloway. Jr., Assistant Chief. License. Fee Madgementki Branch ADM I.
3
= ^"
E
SUBJECT:
ERIE 1 & 2 CONSTRUCTIG( PERMIT REVIEW COSTS p
g c
v By letter dated October 27,1976 Ohio Edison Company'fiTed a construction permit application with the Commission to build two nuclear power plants near Berlin Heights.
Ohio. The plants were designated as the Erie 1uclear Plant. Units 1 and 2.
On January 23. 1980 Ohio Edison requested that NRC teminate any further proceeding, on the Constructica Permit Application for Erie 1 & 2 (Enclosure 1) and by order dated January 28, 1980 the Atoeie Safety and Licensing Board Panel dismissed the proceeding (Enslosure 2). The Camrission notified Ohio Edison on April 25, 1980 (Enclosure,1) that we considered the appifcation withdrawn.
In accordance with LFM established guidelines concerning the assessment of fees fbr withdrawn appitcations, we have reviewed the costs incurred by the various program offices from the date the appitcation was filed to the date of withdrawal of the applic:: tion. Enclosure' 4 is a suseery of the review costs as well as the supporting de=antation from the program offices. Enclosure 4 shows that there was a minimus-of $1.150,261 expanded for the review of Erie 1 and $16.208 expended for the review of Erie 2.
The application was filed and revfeued under the Commission's standardization progres (utility referencing a STD MSSS/ Custom 80P). Therefore, for purposes of assessing the costs of the Erie 1 & 2 review. we consider the CP fees in 10 CFR 170.21 A.4.a.
as the maximum allowable for recovery. The maximum that can be assessed for the review of Erie 1 is $978.600 ($125.000 + $853.600). The maximum to be assessed for the review of Erie Z is $162.500. Since the costs of the review for Unit i exceeds the noximum allowed. then $978.600 would be appitcable to Unit I while the costs of
$16,20d,which is below the 3162.500 allowed, would be applicable to Unit 2.
The total appitcable under the Consission's regulations for both units is 5994,808.
Since Ohio Edison paid an application fee of $125.000, this amount would be deducted from the total of 5994.808 leaving a balance due of $869.a08 for review of the Erie 1
& 2 application. We plan to notify the Office of Controller to bill Chfo Edison for the Casurisstas's cost of reviewing the withdrouc appifcation.
2gned C James HoUoway, Jr.
MM@
- c. James Holloway. Jr.. Assistant Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Adarinistration
Enclosures:
- 1. 1/23/80 Recuest for +.emination
/
", 1r of proceedings L
- ADM 2.1/29/0@ASLER. Termination of preceedings- - -
- -"K hTer~:Ta
~
L DM.
TMB :@t.
77/g730-0 Mil br way 3.
of Costs and Supporting Docul-entatfort
- 80. N.RR.to. 0hto. Edisos...
- o/d -/m -
-9/, p -
4.
unna
/
6 2-m i
.p.
om
SHAW ITTMANs PoTTs & TROW IDGE 8800 u STnCETs N. W.
WASHlNOTCN. O. C. 2C O3 6 43083 2 4400 masenaw & DOTTS STEWCN L.w rLf Em -
strua*T L **Th am DCam O.auuca O,Ecect.F Toows.meOGC sosene g ng gg
. u-c
.oTT arc e.c. e e.u m e.
reteeO,s,c.
,S( MAL,O Csea8.#CFr weasTwmOp N. e#Owse f
es.m a.c ~een sa-ess.
.u.
<noas su-cu* * *u 'roo
- a. fewCTeer a.usseLCM m ee...t. 3aseLEN SOSEB'
. O.o c - 0cus. s..
c.
.Lc-Josem s. nenntLamota mostat a. noeseems ggggx a
- SF T C
49*8e*03(SMawb4W WSMS weC?Oesa J..tp.50= O6A2 Le se eC O J A.
g saastsee D. a WeCsaaaO J.. mall O*bE ews
_'AWbA'#"
8 CNDALL JCasse me O'N C ILL. J N.
Jav E.$sLSEnc ar a. KPsTig es samtama an aCSSOTTg asseO L. 6LLg es
- " "" 8"'""
was e CFo aCYNOLOS L
e ETs. as C CTCas F#CD a uTTLE LuCT G. tLeasor gemeurg 3. CaOSLAsso retODeatwgm peut a. amaLase maf esassat t e e nttQ, JR.
maset es.3643sp*CCCL COUesSCL essem auGENGLacu Te*0 stas w. enecomweca EmmEST L.eLamC.s2 SUE.*8e S. FALn Sces C,a 'I.*". 1.5 1*
so-se 6. ca.A.'.'e"*
\\
'e'O.t.*/'
...u.ac.
- "h* * "..'c *'3%
O'!*.tC'se'.e"J.s ',
January 2'3, 1980 A paratCa ses CmamLES w. Suaa5NT
- damers inces.caCT s LEJesaasrF moeget as. GonOcas
. t a.neame - a c.
Elizabeth S. Bowers, Esquire chai r: nan Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co:=nission Washington, D. C.
20555 Re:
Ohio Edison Comeany Erie Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2)
~ Docket Nos. 50-580 and 50-581
Dear Ms. Bowers:
Enclosed is a ccpy of a news release issued on January 23, 1980, by Chio Edison Ccmpany, which announces a decisien by the co-owners of the Erie Nuclear Plant, Units 1'and 2, to cancel those units.
p.
In light of the decision to cancel these units, we respect-fully request that the Ate:nic Safety and Licensing Board ter:ninate any further proceedings on these dockets.
Very truly yours,
/*
Y ll T.
/bi-S. -
y Ja. E.'S'ilbere Counsel /for Applicants-
/
cc:
Er. Frederick P. Cowan Mr. Frederick J. Shon
~
Charles Barth, Esquire
'Mr. James R. Yore Alan S. Rosenthal, Esquire Ms. Evelyn Stebbins Mr. Robert W. Tufts Docketing 'and Service Ser: tion h,
/
Nsl 5Y!
c
\\
1 o
-7 6
I.
h
~
fr Lihur.u STATES OF AMERICA gg i r ta f BUNAA EEGULATOEY COMMISSION s
g cC G
THE ATOMIC SAFETY 15D LICENSING EOA.
o
+,
r 3@g,B Elizabeth S. Bewers, Chs- -=
9
-3 Sfg,gt Dr. Frederick P. Cowan b
Frederick.J. Shon g.5 V
I D
In the' Matter of
)
.)
OEIO EDISON COMPANI, ~et al.
)
Docket Nos. STN 50-580
}
STN 50-581
~~
(Erie Nuclear Power Plant,
)
Units 1 and 2)
)
~
DISMISSAL OF PROCEEDINGS On January 23, 1980, Ohio Edison Cc::pany, the Applicant for Erie Nuclear Plant, Units.1 ~and 2, announced the decision by the co-cw=ers to cancel th sse -des.
The
. Applicant requested the Boaid to ter=inate any further
~-
~
proceedings on these dockets.
The proceedin5 on Erie is hereby disuissed.
~
~
FOR THE ATOMIC SA rTY AND LICENSING BOARD Y4 hwm Elizp ern S. Sowers, Cnal: an Dated at Bethesdh, Maryland this 28th day of January 1980.
..~
e.
,N l {,.
/l I [J
.. b, l
f l
l l i i
e r L. J l
La: L:-.
.. w i
(
t. i f, 3
U y
~
~,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[g3 e
a e E WuASHafeGTOr*, D. C. 20555 t.,,
I
%,*** /
APR 2 51.80
/
m Docket Mos..STN 50-580 and STN 50-581 Mr. Clyde W. Frederickson Vice President Ohio Edison Company 76 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44308
Dear Mr. Frederickson:
SulklECT:. NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION - ERIE 'N'UCLEAR PLA$, UNITS ld
~
~
4 AND 2 By letter dated January 23, 1980, your attorney requested the Atomic Safety and' Licensing Board designated for this proceeding to terminate the proceedings for the Erie Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
By order dated January 28, 1980, the e
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board dismissed the proceedings. Accordingly, the Commission considers the application submitted by Ohio Edisen Ccmpany en behalf of itself and the The Toledo Edison Company, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Cepany, Duquesne Light Company and Pennsylvania Power Company to be withdrawn.
A copy of the Notice of Withdrawal of Application, which has been forwarded to the Office of the Federal Register f'r publication, ir enclosed for your infor-mation.
Our Office of Administration will
';. tact you regarding fees due, if any, to cover review costs in acccedance with 10 CFR Part 170.
Sincerely, Robert L. Baer, Chief Light Water Reactors Branch No. 2 Division of Project Manageme't
Enclosure:
Not; ice of Withdrawal cc5 w/ enclosure:
~ '
"~l See nut page g
gg -
. c......h
.w r
... }
~
\\
b I^ ' N
[;
I N x} l
'~
~
l l
...-.-c-i
Mr. Clyde W. Frederickson Vice -President Ohio Edison Company
~
76 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44308 cc:
Mr. 5. M. Miller Ohio Edison. Company 76 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44308 Mr. William Kessler
.Cor.monwalth Asrociates, Inc.
209 East Washington Jacksonville, Michigan.49201 Gerald Charnoff, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
Washington,D. C.
20036 Thomas A. Kayuha, Esquire
~
Ohio Edison Company 76 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44308 t
Mr. A. H. Lazar Babcock and Wilcox Power Generation Group P. O. Box 1260 Lynchburg, Virginia 24505
- Mr Robert W. Tufts 352 West College Street Oberlin, Ohio 44074 Elizabeth S. Bowers, Esq., Chairman
' Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington,D. C.
20555 E'
Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Apartment B-125 6152 N. Verde Trail Boca Raton, Florida 33433 Mr. Frederick J. Shon Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington,D. C.
20555 Jay Silberg, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
Wtshingten,D. C.
20036
Mr. R. J. McWharter cc: Ohio Denartment of Health ATTN: Director of Health 450 East Town Street Columbus, Ohio 43216 Ohio Power Siting Commission ATTN:
Chief, Office of Technical Evaluation 361 East Broad Street P. O. Box 1735 Columbus, Ohio 43216 Chairman Erie County Commissioners 323 Columbus Avenue Sandusky, Ohio 44870 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ATTN:
EIS Coordinator Federal Activities Branch Region V _.0ffice 239 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604
/
G G
9 g
e k
e
'"W" J
~ " ~
' UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKET NOS. STN 50-580 AND STN 50-581 OHIO EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND FACILITY LICENSES On March 1,1977, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission docketed an appli-cation submitted by Ohio Edison Company on behalf of itself and The Toledo Edison Company, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Duquesne Light Company and Pennsylvania Power Company.
This application, filed pursuant to Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act, requested authorization to construct and operate two pressurized water reacters, designated as Erie Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2, on a site located in Erie County, Ohio.
Notice of receipt of this application was published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on March 10, 1977 (42 FR 3363). The related notice of hearing was also published on May 16,1977 (42 F.R. 24775).
On January 23,1980, Ohio Edison Company requested the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to terminate the hearing proceedings.
By order dated January 23, 1980., the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board dismissed the proceedings.
. Accordingly, the Cocrnission considers the application submitted by Ohio Edison Company to be withdrawn. Correspondence concerning this appli-cation will continue to be maintained at the Cocraission's Public Document Room,1717 H. Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
For historical purposes only, selected matef_.ial will be retained at the Berlin Township Public Library,
[*
l ; b ; j,
\\
r' s
7 tj
)
, 4 East Main Street, Berlin Heights, Ohio. This material may be viewed by interested members of the public.
No new material will be forwarded to the Berlin Township Public Library.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION iklgh/ / W'-4
?
Robert L. Baer, Chief Light Water Reactors Branch No. 2 Division of Project Management Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 25th day of April,1980 e
N
- e> e, 9
W
Ohio Edison Company Erie 1 & 2 Withdrawn 1/28/80 Dockets 50-5LO, 581 UTILITY REFERENCING A STD NSSS AND CUSTOM B0P 10 CFR 170 A.4.a.
Program Office Professional Cost of Professional Manpower Contractual Total Review Man-hrs Expended Manpower /hr.
Cost _
Costs Costs Unit 1 NRR 17,545 hours0.00631 days <br />0.151 hours <br />9.011243e-4 weeks <br />2.073725e-4 months <br /> E
$39
$684,255
$459,600
$1.143,855 IE 246 hours0.00285 days <br />0.0683 hours <br />4.06746e-4 weeks <br />9.3603e-5 months <br /> 36 8,856 8,856 ACRS 151 hours0.00175 days <br />0.0419 hours <br />2.496693e-4 weeks <br />5.74555e-5 months <br /> 50 7,550 7,550 ASLBP (Contested hearing)- ASLAP (No sua sponte review) Total
$1,160,261 Unit 2-IE 240.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> 36 3,658 $8,658 ACRS 151 hours0.00175 days <br />0.0419 hours <br />2.496693e-4 weeks <br />5.74555e-5 months <br /> 50 7,550 7,550 Total
$16,208 The total cost for Unit 1 is $1,160,261 and $16,208 for Unit 2.
As stated in 170.21 the maximum fee that can be assessed based on the above costs is $978,600 for Unit I and $16,208 for Unit 2.
Since only an application fee of
$125,000 has been paid, the balance due NRC is $869,808.
Unit 1
$978,600 Unit 2 16,208
$994,808 Less Appl. Fee -125,000
$869,808 N erb Berkow on May 22, 1980 stated that there was essentially no manpower expended in H
preparation for the hearing, despite the fact that the case was contested, since the case never got to the formal hearing stage.
2_/ Although Ohio Edison withdrew the application before a fomal hearing was held, ASLBP considered the case as contested up to the time of withdrawal of the application.
GNChosutc y
.