ML19269D488

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-313/79-04 & 50-368/79-04
ML19269D488
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/1979
From: Madsen G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Cavanaugh W
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML19269D489 List:
References
NUDOCS 7906040149
Download: ML19269D488 (1)


See also: IR 05000313/1979004

Text

,.

.

_ . . - _ .

  1. ght "E;'eq

UNITED STATES

6 f[

,

o

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

o

REGION IV

{y

$

611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000

o

ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011

%J

g*

April 30,1979

Docket Nos. 50-313

50-368

,

Arkansas Power and Light Company

ATTN: Mr. William Cavanaugh

Vice President of Generation

and Construction

P. O. Box 551

Little Rock, Arkansas 72203

Gentlemen:

Thank you for your letter of March 21, 1979, in response to our letter dated

February 28, 1979, and the attached Notice of Violation. An apparent dis-

agreement continues to exist regarding which instruments are classified

as effluent monitors. Our position on this matter is that a monitor

positioned on a potential effluent pathway releasing directly into the

environments is considered an effluent monitor.

Through review of plant

drawings and discussion with plant personnel, it appeared to the inspector

that the monitors listed in paragraph 6.b of Inspection Report 50-368/79-04

fit into the category of effluent monitors.

Your March 21, 1979 response states that further review by your staff has

determined that some of the monitors listed in the above inspection report

should be classified as process monitors, thereby exempting these monitors

from calibration requirements. We have no further questions at this time,

but we will review this matter during future inspections.

Sincerely,

'

3d 9ffM'

G. L. Madsen, Chief

Reactor Operations and

-

Nuclear Support Branch

2259

114

7 906040]LlQ f

M-