ML19259B523
| ML19259B523 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 12/27/1978 |
| From: | Hayes D, Naidu K, Wescott H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19259B517 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-329-78-15, 50-330-78-15, NUDOCS 7903010361 | |
| Download: ML19259B523 (17) | |
See also: IR 05000329/1978015
Text
.
1
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
keport No. 50-329/78-15; 50-330/N-15
Docket No. 50-329; 50-330
License No. CPPR-81; CPPR-62
Licensee: Consumers Power Company
1945 West Parnall Road
Jackson, MI 49201
Facility Name: Midland Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
Inspection At: Midland Site, Midland, MI
Inspection Condu c ed.:
November 1-3, 1976
J
< I '" D)j' -
lc
/
/2 j27'd_'
.
Inspectors:
H. M. Wescott
&W . ,i a s 3 s,1w
.
UM E
/, K.
R. Naidu
I
Rc B 6 G.F M<. w //
.
/Z N 27
G. F. Maxwell
/ d Sa w
c
,y
P. A.
Barrett
'f) s"/
c. 1 ~ >
- 2 A '7 !M~
Approved By: D M .~ HayeI, Ch f
Projects Section
Inspection Summary
Inspection on November 1-3, 1978 (Report No. 50-329/78-15; 50-330/78-15)
Areas Inspected.: Review of documentation for decay heat removal pumps
re-radiography and repair; review of technical specifications for cable
tray; observation of safety related structures work activities; review
of safety related structures quality records; observation of safety
related structures welding activity; review of safety related structures
welding records; review of documentation on recirculating air cooling
units; review of B&W welding monitoring program; review of B6W manage-
ment audit; review of specification for new and spent fuel racks and
7903039gqq
,
quality documents; review of electrical implementation documents; obser-
.
and
vation of electrical work; review of electrical activity records;
followup review of previously identified unresolved and noncompliance
items. The inspection involved a total of 92 inspector-hours onsite by
four NRC inspectors.
Of the fourteen areas inspected, two items of noncompliance
Results:
(Infraction - inadequate control of welding -
were identified in one area
Section II, paragraph 3 and Details under Licensee Action on Previous
Inspection Findings).
2
.
.
.
D_ETAI LS
Persons Contacted
Pr'
_ gal Licensee Employees
- J. L. Corley, Section Head - Examination and Test Verification
- D.
R. Keating, QA Group Supervisor
- P. Kyner, QA Engineer
- D.
B. Miller, Site Manager
R. Ostrowski, Welding NDE Specialist
- B.
H. Peck, Construction Supervisor
Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation
- W.
Barclay, Project Field QC Engineer
- L.
R. Basinski, Resident Engineer
B.
Dahr, Project Engineer (Civil)
L. A. Dreisback, Project Field QA Engineer
- R.
C. Hollar, QA Engineer
- P.
A.
Martinez, Project Manager
- J. F. Newgem, Project Superintendent
- J.
E. Russell, Project Field QC Engineer
- E. Smith, for L. A. Dreisback, Project Field QA Engineer
B&W Construction Company
- V. N. Asgaokar, Project Engineer
- R. W. Shope, QC Supervisor
NRC Resident Inspector
- R.
J. Cook
- Denotes those present at the exit meeting.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
(0 pen) Unresolved Item (329/78-05-01; 330/78-05-02):
Inadequate docu-
mentation on "0" rings.
It was previously reported that inadequate
documentation was available for the "O" rings supplied by Parker, which
were being used between the weld neck flange and the penetration.
Review of correspondence between Bechtel and Bunker Ramos Corporation,
the supplier of the electrical penetrations, indicates that these "0"
rings have not met the initial environmental qualification requirements.
The "0" rings have been identified with " Hold Tags."
It was reported
-3-
,
,
that the specification requirements were relaxed and retests were in
'
progress. The revised specification requirements, the technical basis
for relaxation and the results of the tests will be examined during a
subsequent inspection.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item (329/78-05-03; 330/78-05-04): Safety status of
Spent Fuel Pool Facilities Installation.
Clarification from IE:HQ on
this matter has not been received.
(Open) Noncompliance (329/78-03-02; 330/78-03-02): Voltage requirencnt
not specified in the Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) Pl-A-Lh
structural.
Review of the implementation of the corrective action
described in the enclosures to the Licensce's letter HOWE 89-7S dated
June 7, 1978, and the response HOWE-223-78 dated October 31, 1978, indi-
cates that welding voltage has been incorporated in WPS PI-A-Lh structural.
However, information on the WPS's which were revised, was not available
during the current inspection, and therefore, these WPS's were not
reviewed.
(Closed) Noncompliance (329/76-03-01; 330/78-03-01):
Shop Welding Inspec-
tion Reports of Haven Busch did not document whether defective root passes,
which were repaired, were reinspected after repair.
This item uas
originally identified as an unresolved item in Inspection Report 50-329/
77-13 and 50-330/77-15, and it was later escalated to an item of noncom-
pliance in Report 50-329/78-03 and 50-330/78-03. During the current
inspection, the inspector reviewed the implementation of the corrective
action outlined in the enclosures to the licensee's letter HOWE-89-78
dated June 7, 1978.
Bechtel conducted an audit which identified several
other discrepancies in the Haven Busch records. The audit disclosed
that in some instances the reinspections on the weld repairs were entered
on the reverse side of the inspection records; this side was not
reproduced and included in the documentation supplied.
Other reinspec-
tions were not properly documented. These discrepancies were not detected
and identified by the Bechtel shop inspector during Vendor Surveillances.
In addition, the audit identified several embedments with nonconforminE
Nelson Stud attachments. These findings are documented in two separate
NCR's No. 1345 and No. 1346. NCR No. 1345 identifies those embedments
with defective Nelson Stud attachments which were not installed and
consequently available for repairs. NCR No. 1346 identifies those
embedments with suspected defective welds based on inadequate documen-
tation which were already embedded in concrete and not available for
reinspection and repair.
NCR Nc. 1345 indicates that the Nelson Studs failed the hammer test
prescribed in the AUS D1.1 Code.
Bechtel evaluated the test results
and determined that the Nelsen Studs were foreseen for axial tension,
not shear loads, and prescribed axial tension testing.
Correc tive
-4-
.
.
action recommended for nonconformity Nelson Stud weld attachments was
to repair them using Shielded Metal Arc Welding, to AWS D1.1, paragraph
4.29.3 requirements. Quality Control Inspection Reports (QCIRs) indicate
the welding procedure used and the welding inspections performed.
How-
ever,. tests were neither prescribed nor performed as required in paragraph
4.30.1 of the AWS Dl.1 code for Nelson studs repaired with SMAW.
Para-
graph 4.30.1 in part states "If a visual inspection reveals any stud shear
connector that does not show a full 360 degree weld fillet, any stud that
has been repaired by welding, or any stud.
less than normal, such
. .
stud shall be struck with a hammer and bent to an angle of 15 degrees
from it's original axis."
The inspector informed the licensee that cor-
rective action taken was considered inadequate, and an item of noncompli-
ance contrary to the requirements of Criterion XVI of 10 CFR 50, Appendix
B.
(392/78-15-01; 330/78-15-01)
NCR 1346 documents those embedments with discrepant documentation on
the welds which had been installed.
This NCR was closed on the
basis of visual inspection and acceptance of those items listed in
1345. The inspector has no further questions on this NCR.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item (329/78-06-01; 330/78-06-01): The use of G-
321-D forms relative to electrical class lE equipment. The use of
this form will be evaluated by RIII during subsecnent inspections to
be conducted in the Bechtel-Ann Arbor office.
(open) Unresolved Item (329/78-04-02; 330/78-04-02):
Class 1E Components
not uniquely identified to assure conpliance with 10 CFR 55.a(h) (IEEE- 279-1971), paragraphs 1.0 and 4.22.
Chapter 9 - 3.1.3 of the Midland FS AR
has been revised to include color coding of terminal equipment.
However,
these requirements have not yet been translated into implementing pro-
cedures.
This item remains open and will be reviewed during future
inspections.
(open) Unresolved Item (329/78-04-01; 330/78-04-01): Electrical raceva,
and grounding system not included on the Q-list.
IE is corresponding
with NRR about this concern; action pending results of correspondence.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (329/78-04-04; 330/78-04-04): Clearance tol-
erance between Class 1E cable tray, cable tray supports or conduit and
adjacent field run piping not translated into specifications, drawings,
procedures or instructions. Specification E420 has been revised to
include clearance tolerances between Class 1E cable tray, cable tray
supports and conduit which is installed near piping, H&V duct instru-
ment tubing and equipment.
-5-
,
(open) Unresolved Item (329/78-06-02; 330/78-06-02):
Clarification of
the proposed Bechtel disposition for Nonconformance Report NCR No. 1207
(concerning cable clearances within Class 1E electrical cabinets).
1ne
inspector observed that Consumers Power Company has received additional
information relative to the Bechtel disposition provided for NCR No.
1207. However, all of the information has not yet been provided to
clarify the disposition of those conditions identified in NCR No. 1207.
This item remains open and will be reviewed during future inspections.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (329/78-07-01; 330/78-07-01):
Control of
measuring and test equiptien t .
The electrical crimping tool, ID No.
BPC-2397, has been located. The tool was inspected and found to be
uniquely 3ntified per Bechtel procedure FPG-6.000, revision 2, para-
graph 5.4.' and is traceable to its supportive documentation.
Licensee Action on Decay Heat Removal Pumps, Re-Radiography (50.55:e)
R gort) Units 1 and 2
__
The inspector verified that the actions taken by Consumers Power Company
as delineated in their final report dated August 2, 1978 (HOWE-126-73),
are acceptaFle.
This matter is considered closed.
(Also see Section I,
Item 1).
-6-
.
Section I
Prepared by H. M. Wescott
Reviewed by D. W. Hayes. Chief
Projects Section
1.
Review of Licensee Action on becay Heat Removal Pumps, Re-Radiograpig
_
for Midland Units 1 and 2 (50.55(e) Report)
The inspector reviewed the four (4) documentation packages
a.
titled " Decay Heat Removal Pump (Casing Rework) 23-1216-03,
620-0012" and "23-1387-01, 620-0013," for pumps serial
numbered 69080, 69081, 690S2 and 69083.
The packages con-
tained Certificates of Conformance and Statemcnts of
Conformance, Radiograph and Liquid Penetrant Reports, Hydro
Test Reports, Cleanlinest Certificates.
The inspector
verified the pump serial numbers by visual examination of
each pump installed.
b.
The inspector reviewed the audits of B6W Ltd., as follows:
(1)
Consumers Power Company Audit of B6W Ltd. , Canada
dated Fby 30, 1978.
(2)
BiW Audit of B&W Ltd. Audit of AIR's 78-7. ITD/2TD/3TD
dated May 31, 1978.
(3)
B6W Audit NPGD OA Audit of B&W Ltd. dated June 6, 1976.
(4)
E6W Company QA Audit of B&W Ltd. dated July 21, 1978.
The above appeared to be complete.
This matter is considered'
to be closed.
2.
Review of Desig_n Specification for Cable Tray, Observation of
Cable Tray Units 1 and 2
The inspector reviewed the " Technical Specification for Cable Tray
for Seismic Class I Structures for the Consumers Power Company
Midland Plant Units 1 and 2" Specification 7220-E-55. Revision 1,
issued for use November 14, 1976 and made observations of cable
tray and fittings supplied by Burndy/ Husky.
-7-
,
.
the fittings
Observation of cable tray and fittings established that
filler material.
were joined by using a bronze
A previous question conccrning classification of cable tray as
to
safety related or non-safety related has been referred to the NRC
Headquarters staff.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were noted in the above
areas.
_g-
,
.
Section II
Prepared by K. R. Naidu
Reviewed by R. L. Spessard, Chief
Engineering Support
Section 1
1.
Observation of Safety Related Structures Work Activities Units
1 and 2
The inspector observed the activities in progress relative to
the instc11ation of the seismic Category I support structures
of the Main Steam Isolation Valve ct 704' 0" on the auxiliary
building and determined that the work procedures were being
met in the following areas:
a.
Receipt inspections were performed on the miscelleneous
steel structures.
b.
The steel components were being installed to design drawings.
c.
Specified material and components were being used,
d.
Citrasonic test procedure to examine the walds had not beer
developed.
e.
No final inspections had been completed.
2.
Review of Saf ety Related Structures cuality Records Units 1 and 2
The inspector reviewed the pertinent work and quality records
relative to the insta;1ation of the seismic Category 1 support
etructure for the Main Steam Isolation Valves for Units 1 and 2
and determined that the records meet established procedures in
the following areas:
a.
Material Receiving Reports (MRR) No. AE0-7241, 7308 and
7227 indicate that several components of the seismic
support structure furnished by Schreiber >bnuf acturing
Company Incorporated were received without any visible
shipping damage,
b.
The documentation on the components was incomplete; NCR
1553 identifies discrepancies in documentation on the beams
supplied relative to the requirements of specification
7220-C-233 Revision 13.
-9-
w
,
,
No items of noncempliance or deviations were identified in the
above areas.
Observation of Safety Related Structures Welding Activity Units
3.
1 and 2
The inspector observed welding activities in progress relative
structures to ascertain whether
to the Units I and 2 MSIV support
the requirements of applicable work procedures and inspection
and determined the following.
procedures were met
1 side
inspector observed three welds on the Unit
a.
The
preparation and alignment were complete;
where joint
the licensee personnel concurred with the inspector that
the fitup was more than 1/8" which is in excess of the
These welds are identified
specification requirements.
On the
in Section J of drawing C-835(Q) Revision 2.
2 side, two celds where joint preparation had been
Unit
completed were observed and, the fitup gap appeared to
be within permissible limits. These welds are identified
in Section B, Detail 1, on drawing C-836(Q) Revision 3.
Several welds had been completed on the Units 1 and 2
b.
structures, but they had not been subjected to final
The inspector observed that nine completed
inspection.
1 structure were oversize, and therefore
welds on the Unit
unacceptable. These welds are on the west side identified
Two 1" size
in Section J of drawing C-835(Q) Revision 2.
welds on Unit 2 east side had insufficient throat at
These welds are identified in Section
certain locations.
B of Detail 1 on drawing C-836(Q).
The 3;censee was unable to explain why these welds were
identified as nonconforming during welding surveil-
not
A licensee representative measured the welds
lances.
with weld gauges, and concurred with the inspector's
A Bechtel QC inspector stated that a discrep-
findings.
ancy report would be generated documenting the nonconforming
welds and the excessive fitup gaps discussed in a. above.
Weld Procedure Specification (WPS) PI-A-Lh Structural was
c.
being used.
5/32" diameter veldrod type E7018 was being used by the
d.
welders.
Welders qualified to WPS Pl-A-Lh Structural were performing
e.
the welding.
- 10 -
,
The inspector determined that welding processes were inadequately
centrolled which led to the placement of several welds - both
oversize and undersize - which were not in conformance with those
specified in drawing C-835 and C-836.
were available at the place of work to measure and verify the
sizes of the welds placed. The inspector infctmed the licensee
that this condition was contrary to the requirements of Criterion
IX of the 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and paragraph 5.2 of the Consumers
Power Company Quality Assurance Program for Design and Construction,
Procedure 9-1.
(329/76-15-02; 330/78-15-02)
Except as noted, no items of noncompliance or deviations were
identified.
4.
Review cf Safety Related Structures Welding Records Units 1 and 2
The inspector reviewed the Quality Control Inspection Records
for the Units i and 2 MSIV Seismic Category 1 Structures and
determined that the records reflect work accomplishment met
the applicable requirement in the following areas:
a.
Prerequisites such as inspection criteria, open NCRs,
in-process inspection activities were met.
b.
Welder qualifications were reviewed and determined acceptabic.
c.
Inspection of final welds had not been performed.
d.
Inspection of full penetration welds included an additional
requirement to ultrasonically examine the welds.
An approved
Ultrasonic Test (PT) procedure was not avellable at the site.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in the
above areas.
5.
Review of Doc _umentation on Recirculating Air Cooling Units
The inspector reviewed the documentation relative to the Recircu-
lating Air Cooling Units identified as 2VM-56 A, B, C and D to
ascertain whether the records indicate that the requirements of
the Technical Specification 7220-M-163 were met.
The inspector
determined the following:
a.
MRR-AE0 No. 5774 dated March 14, 1978, and AE0 No. 5922
dated April 4, 1978, identifies that the material was
received with no apparent shipping damage.
b.
The QCIR identifies illegible documentation and references
NCRs 1394 and 1404.
- 11 -
~
.
,
c.
Review of NCRs 1394 and 1404 indicates that the documents
received with the shipment had considerable data n.issing
and illegible documents.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in the
above areas.
6.
Review of Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) Welding Monitoring Program
The inspector discussed the Welding Monitoring Program with the
B6W QC representative and was given to understand that each
welding machine is checked twice during each shift in the fol-
lowing manner.
The welding machine output is verified; the
welding current and voltage are measured with calibrated
instruments and compared with the parameters specified in the
WPS.
The inspector reviewed a typical " Weld Control Record" No. 000101
which documents the welder ID, the date, the measured values of
the voltage and current and the electrode diameter.
Unique
traceability identification of the measuring devices is furnished.
The inspector reviewed the calibration records of the " Tong
Tester" type ammeter Serial No. ET1-16 and 666R Triplett type
ohm / voltmeter Serial No. ET2-17 and determined them to be current.
The measured values of the voltage and current were within the
parameters specified in the Welding Instruction Sheet No. W1N-101-2.
No items of noncompliance or devictions w;re identified in the
above areas.
7.
Revi_ew of B&W Panagement Audit
The inspector reviewed the results of the annual management
audit performed on B6W site by the B&W corporate Quality
Assurance department, Copley, Ohio.
Three findings identified
during the audit were resolved.
The corrective actions taken
by the field were reviewed and accepted by the auditors.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in
the above areas.
8.
Review of the Specification for New and Spent Fuel Racks
The inspector reviewed the Technical Specification for the
purchase of New and Spent Fuel Racks C-42(Q).
Additional
information is required relative to how the licensee proposes
to assure the integrity of the cavity weldment seal welds in
- 12 -
, *
,
.
the encapsulated spent fuel tubes.
The licensee stated that hc
will discuss this matter further with his corporate office.
This
is considered an unresolved matter.
(329/73-15-03; 330/78-15-03)
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in the
above areas.
- 13 -
e
,
,
.
Section III
Prepared by C.
F. Maxwell a.id
P. A.
Barrett
Reviewed by R.
L. Spessard, Chief
Engineering Support
Section 1
1.
Quality Documents - Units 1 and 2
The RIII inspector toured the site and selected a total of 27
Bechtel " Work Prints" from three different ateas where safety-
related activities were in process.
The drawings (Mechanical
and Electrical) were checked, and, with one exception, were
found to have all of the applicable DCN's, FCN's and FCR's
attached on the reverse side (a requirement of Bechtel proce-
dure FPD-3.000 Revision 1 paragraph 4.0).
The inspector
observed that corrective action was in process to have the
missing FCR's and FCN's attached to the drawing in question and
other drawings which CPCo QA personnel have identified as not
having their DCN's, FCR's and FCN's attached (reference CPCo
QA Audit Report 01-36-8).
No items of noncompliance were identified.
2.
Review of Electrical Implementation Documents
The RII' inspector reviewed the following procedure, drawing
and instructions:
FPE-4.000 Revision 1 -- Installation of Electrical Cable
Drawing No. E-47(Q)
Sepsration of Class IE Equipment
Revision 0
-- and Circuits.
FIE-1.300 Revision 0 -- Electrical Field Construction Personnel
and QC Coordination.
FIE-4.100 Revision 1 -- Receiviag, Storage, Identifiestion and
Issuing of Cable.
FIE-3.500 Revision 0 -- Color Coding of Power, Control and
Instrumentation Cables for Class IE
Service.
QCI E-4.0 Revision 2 -- Installation of Electric Cables.
- 14 -
a w
,
t
i
Except as noted below, the above docum2nts, when used in combi-
nation with euch other, prescribe the quantitative and qualitative
acceptance criteria necessary to accomplish the designated activities.
Procedure FPE-4.000 Revision 1, paragraph 6.2 states, that " cable
in vertical tray sections or risers shall be tied down at intervals
of no greater than ten feet."
Quality Control Instruction No.
E-4.0 Revision 2 paragraph 3.2 requires inspection of cable for
attachment to trays at required intervals with approved cable ties.
Drawing E-42(Q) sheet 7 indicates compliance with the National
Electric Code for cables installed in the vertical position.
None
of these documents specify the type of support (cable tie) to be
used to accomplish the implied tasks, which would have to meet the
general design criteria for the Midland site.
The licensee stated
that an evaluation would be made to determine the type of support
required.
There have been no Class IE cables installed in the
above conditions to date.
This matter is unresolved and will be
reviewed during a subsequent inspectio~n.
(329/78-15-04; 3:
76-15-04)
Procedure FPE-4.000 Revision 1 paragraph 5.0 states, that
if
cable has been exposed to temperatures of 0 degrees F or lower
just prior to use, the cable shall be stored in a heated room
for one shift prior to installation." Of the three cable
suppliers and three types of cable reviewed by the RIII inspector,
the basis (manufacturer's instruction) for the above temperature
and time parameters for only one supplier and type of cable was
available.
The licensee stated that the remaining manufacturer's
instructions would be obtained for the pertinent cable types.
'inis matter is unresolved.
(329/78-15-05; 330/78-15-05)
No items cf noncompliance were identified.
3.
Observation of Electrical k'ork
The RIII inspector observed two partially installed 5000
a.
,
volt power cables to service water pump motors, No. lAA0535A
and No. 2AA0503A.
Both cables were of the type and size >
specified.
The cable ends were covered with protective
heat shrink caps.
Conduit bushings were properly instal-
led at the switchgear entrances (from ends).
The cables
were conspicuously color coded.
The use of pulling compound
was evident.
The RIII inspector observed the in-process installation
of 5000 volt power cable No. OEA0002A into embed conduit
No. 2EA024.
The cable type and eize were as specified.
The cable was attached to the pulling line with an
- 15 -
,
,
,
appropriate grip. Approved pulling compound was being
adequately applied. Softeners and bushings were used
to prevent jacket damage. A dynamometer, of current
calibration, was being used to monitor the pulling tension.
b.
The RIII inspector observed the cable storage yard. The
cable reels were being maintained in accordance with Field
Instrrction, FIE-4.100 dated October 16, 1978.
The cable
reels were properly identified and placed on dunnage.
The
cable ends were sealed.
The cable reels were aligned to
preclude contact which might damage the cable.
c.
The inspector observed the installation of cable tray
1DTA03, a safety related cable tray located in Unit 1
Auxiliary building elevation 625'6".
The tray was
installed and inspected in accordance wich Bechtel drawing
E-616(Q) Revision 8 and Bechtel procedure PQC1 E-2.0
Revision 5.
The inspector noted that Bechtel procedure
FPE-3.000, paragraph 5.0 requires that cable tray framing
bolts and tray splice plate bolts be tightened in accord-
ance with manufacturer's recommendations.
The inspectors
observed that CPCo QA personnel have written a nonconformance
report (NCR No. M-01-4-8-092) concerning FPE-3.000 paragraph
5.0, as no manufacturer's recommendations were rer.dily
available for use.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
4
Record Review of Electrical k'ork Activities
The RIII inspector reviewed the Cable Installation
a.
Inspection Records for partially completed cables
No. 1AA0505A and No. 2AA0503A.
The records identified the
inspector, the type of observation, the results, the
acceptability, and noted deficiencies.
The records were
identifiable and retrievable.
The acceptance criteria
was appropriate for the activity inspected.
b.
The RIII inspector reviewed the routing of cable No.
lAA0505A as defined by drawings No. E-599(Q) Sheet 2
Revision 0, No. E-510(Q) Revision 9, No. E-531(Q)
Revision 14, No. E-547(Q) Revision 12 and No. E-532(Q)
Revision 12.
The drawings included sufficient interface
and details to define the routing.
The distribution
and control of the above drawings were at two locations
in accordance with the document control center mastet log.
- 16 -
'
.
p
Cable hv. lAA0505A was traceable to the inherent reel,
receipt inspection record, and the purchase order.
c.
The RIII inspector reviewed the Storage Information, F-2,
record for 600 volt control cable.
The record indicated
30 day surveillance for the past year.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Unresolved Item.:
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in
order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompli-
ance, or deviations. Unresolved items disclosed during the inspection are
discussed in Section II, paragraph 8 and Section III, paragraph 2.
Exit Interview
The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted under Persons
Contacted) at the conclusion of the inspection on November 3, 1978.
The
inspectors summarized the purpose and findings of the inspection.
The
licensee acknowledged the findings reported herein.
- 17 -