ML19256D032
| ML19256D032 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/1975 |
| From: | Nolan F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Brunner E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19256D033 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910160762 | |
| Download: ML19256D032 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000289/1974035
Text
.
.
'
- .
J r,'; 2 E 1975
?00RAHINAL
E. J. Brunner, Chief, Reactor rerations i4 ranch, IE:I
T".2U :
J. H. Sniezek, Chief, Facility Inspection pram h, IE:1*.0
METROPOLITAM EDISOM C01.T.W7, THREE MILE ISIX:D .(rff) . INSr?CTION ??.
- 20. 50-239/74-33 OC'io DTD 1/3/73, BR E L1 TO TPOFl'NFG)
The subject mamarandun identifies two items which recuire action:
The first iten is concerned with clarification of facilit'r technical
specifications (TS) relating to power icvel. Action relating to the
teneric reconcendstaon was initiated several conths ago as described
in a memorandum dated June 10, 1974, 3. H. Grier to A. Gianbusso,
copy enclosed for your inforr.ation. Additional correpondence and/or
discussions with RL personnel may be necessary before this tratter is
resolved. We have instituted an AITS item for this generic natter
(E10147F1). We incend to use TMI as a case in point. We concur that
enforcement of the s:ost reetrictive lhit was the proper course of
action.
The second item is concerned with revision of TS shock suppressor
surva111ance requirements for all licensees. This ratter has been
under review and evaluation by Regulatory personnel for some time.
Discussions with Joe Sapir. RL, who has the job of developinst revised
surveillanen requirements for shock suporessors, reveale.d that he
exaeets to have TS revisions ready by February 1975, with implementa-
tion tentatively schsduled for Marcle-Anril 1975. As discussed, the
pronosed TS lancuage vill specify increased surveillance whenever
"ecor" survn111ance cost results are exrerienced.
Fo?lowp discussion with D. Jaffe, RL Project Manager for THI, reveal &'
thac he is ausre of the seismic suporessor eroblens at 2*I.
Mr. Jaff2
stated that the TMI TS vill be revised to reflect increased surveilla::ce
te sting requirements, dapendent on the results of Mr. Sapir's review.
We beli(ve this resolves the action recuested in your w-ornn%.
If
you wish to discuss this witter further, please centact ro,
$i[ll '} Si Md k
f'.a.-
E
~
w%
1446 008
Facility Insnection ? ranch, IT
orric s >
,,,.
.
C C.] y.c Dep.' '
.. ... 7. g { g. {.0 -- --[2-
-
,wa=aua >
oats >
l
Form A2c.313 (Rev. M3) AECM 0240
W u. s. movs amusm? Pamtme orrica t eve.sas.s ee
,
.
.o
V
,,
'
, . .
M' 2 0 ~N
E. J. 2 runner
2
Enclosure:
C , Mem dtd 6/10/74, Grier
to Gianhsaso, I'.CE2PESTA 0F
LICE :SID MC LI2 TITS
cc: (w/o encl)
'
JCDavis, I"
{lg
EDThornburg, IE
KVSeyfrit, IE
JESniai.ek, IE (H10147H1)
FDreher, II (71404321)
JSapir, RL
DJaffe, RL
DISTRIBUTION:
IE Files
IE Reading
FIB Files
O
JESnierek, IE
FJNolan, IE
.
rf,0 870 - 1/28
'o' rec s *
IE:EIE
IE:FIS:C
PJNolan
.u....s*
~74517irilb
.iudnidtitr-
- ar= *
4,
, . _
. _ , ,
m_.
Form AEC 318 (Rre. 9 53YAECM0i40
~
~ # u. s. oovsan us=v paintino orricas s ev4.sse.see