ML19250C158
| ML19250C158 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1979 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Finfrock I JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-06-02.A, TASK-6-2.A, TASK-RR NUDOCS 7911080365 | |
| Download: ML19250C158 (3) | |
Text
Y-
$kk p flto UNITED STATES 8
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
1;;
y WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\\,
OCTOBER -311979 Docket No. 50-219 Mr. I. R. Finfrock, Jr.
Vice President - Generation Jersey Central Power & Light Company Madison Avenue at Punch Bowl Road Morristown, New Jersey 07960
Dear Mr. Finfrock:
RE: ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE MARK I CONTAINMENT LONG TERM PROGRAM
'The staff has completed its review of the generic aspects of the Mark I Containment Long Term Program (LTP).
The results of this review are reflected in the enclosed acceptance criteria, which are intended to be used to perform individual plant-unique analyses for each Mark I f acil ity. These criteria have been developed from the staff's evaluation of the Mark I LTP Load Definition Report, Plant Unique Analysis Appli-cations Guide, and related suppression pool hydrodynamic experimental and analytical programs, which have been submitted by the Mark I Owners Group.
In developing these criteria, we have considered verbal comments provided by representatives of the Mark I Owners Group on a draft of the criteria issued August 2, 1979.
These comments were presented to the staff
'during a meeting held on August 15, 1979, and supplemented by additional infonnation provided in a letter from General Electric dated Septerber 7, 1979.
This information and internal comments by the staff and our consultants _ have resulted in some modifications to the draft criteria.
However, others of the Owners Group recommendations were not adopted for the NRC criteria, based on the staff,',s judgmeat relative to the interpretation of specific data or analyses.
In certain cases, the staffAs generic criteria identify specific hydro-dynamic load assessment techniques that will have to be evaluated on a plant-specific basis. However, deviations from any other generic criteria should be avoided.
The criteria also identify additional experimental verification that must be obtained for " condensation oscillation" load uncertainty. This requirement was communicated to you earlier in our letter dated October 2,1979.
!?75 136 7911080 N S
Mr. I. R. Finfrock Within 30 days of your receipt of this letter, we request that you provide the scriedule for submittal of the LTP plant-unique analysis for your facility.
In developing this schedule, you should consider that we are continuing to target the completion of this program and the termination of the exemption issued for your facility for Decemb'er 1980.
The staff presently expects to issue the generic Safety Evaluation Report supporting these criteria in December 1979.
Should you have any questions regarding this action contact C. Grimes (301-492-8204).
9 Director Division of Operating Reactors
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ enclosure:
See next page 1775 137 t
I
s.
Mr. I. R. Finfrock, Jr..
cc G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 GPU Service Corporation ATTN: Mr. E. G. Wallace Licensing Manager 260 Cherry Hill Road Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Anthony Z. Roisman Natural Resources Defense Council 917 15th Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20005 Steven P. Russo,. Esquire 24.8 Washington Street P. O. Box 1060 Toms River, New Jersey 08753 Joseph W. Ferraro, Jr., Esquire Deputy Attorney General State of New Jersey Department if Law and Public Safety 1100 Raymor i Boulevard Newark, New Jersey 07012 Ocean County Library Erick Township Branch 4Q1 Chanbers Bridge Road Brick Town, New Jersey 08723 1275 138