ML19225B206

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-424/79-07 & 50-425/79-07 on 790425-27. Noncompliance Noted:Failure to Follow Preventive Maint Procedures for safety-related Electrical Components & Failure to Conform to Concrete Design Commitments
ML19225B206
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 05/17/1979
From: Gouge M, Herdt A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19225B182 List:
References
50-424-79-07, 50-424-79-7, 50-425-79-07, 50-425-79-7, NUDOCS 7907240285
Download: ML19225B206 (5)


See also: IR 05000424/1979007

Text

UNITE D STATES

/g* R80 9'o

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

0

,g

REGION il

$

p

g

101 M ARIETT A STRE ET. N.W.

5

..g

' *

ATLANT A, GEORGI A 3o303

o

%...../

Report Nos. 50-424/79-7 and 50-425/79-7

Licensee: Georgi 3 Power Company

270 Peachtree Street, N. W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30302

Facility Name: Alvin W. Vogtle Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2

Docket Nos.

50-424 and 50-425

License Nos.

CPPR-108 and CPPR-109

Inspection at Vogtle Nuclear lant near Waynesbaro, Georgia

E!/

Inspector:

SL

M. J. Gouge

]

Date Signed

f

[/

JJJ[

Approved by:

'

A. R. Herdt, Section Chief, RCES Branch

D4te ighed

SLTiARY

Inspection on April 25-27, 1979

Areas Inspected

This routine, unannounced inspection involved 21 inspector-hours onsite in

the areas of concrete placement, preventive maintenance, and reactor cavity

liner plate welding (Unit 2).

Results

Of the three areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or devia-

tions were identified in one area; one apparent item of concompliance was

found in one area (Infraction - Electrical Preventive Maintenance - Details

paragraph 5.b.) one apparent deviation was found in one area (Concrete Design

Commitments - Details paragraph 5.a).

AIS

162

790724o285

T

.

DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

Licensee Employees

H. H. Gregory, III, Assistant Construction Project Manager

  • D. M. Fiquett, Manager, Field Operations
  • C.

R. Miles, Jr.

QA Field Supervisor

i

  • E. D. Groover, QA Site Supervisor
  • J. F. D'Amico, Senior QA Field Representative
  • C. Sarver, Senior QA lield Representative
  • B. C. Harbin, Civil QC Supervisor

L. J. James, Civil QC Supervisor

W. L. Kent, Soils and Concrete Inspector, Laboratory

  • R. R. Allen, QC Manager

C. D. Mauldin, Associate Mechanical Engineer

R. D. Osbourne, Mechanical QC Inspector

!!. Ahluwali, Electrical Engineer

F. Warren, Electrical QC Inspector

Other licensee employees contacted included various construction

craftsmen and office personnel.

Other Organizations

Chicago Bridge and Iron Company

  • D. F. Wilkerson, QA Superintendent

R. A. Franz, Welding Engineer

G. E. Rowe, QA Engineer

Walsh Construction Company (WCC)

415

i63

  • G. S. Wisen, QC Coordinator
  • Attended exit interview.

2.

Exit Interview

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 27, 1979 with

The licensee acknowledged

those persons indicated in Paragraph I above.

the item of noncompliance and the deviation discussed in this report.

424-425/79-07-01,

The licensee stated that, pending resolution of deviation

no Category I toncrete would be placed with a 91-day design strength

where the PSAR specified a 28-day design strength requirement.

.

-2-

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings

Not inspected.

4.

Unresolved Items

Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.

5.

Independent Inspection Effort

a.

Observation of Concrete Placement (Units I and 2)

The inspector observed placement of Category I concrete pour

1-01D-]08B in Unit 1 tendon gallery wall.

Acceptance criteria

examined by the inspector appear in the following documents:

(1) Section 3.8 of the Vogtle PSAR

(2) GPC Construction Procedure CD-T-02, Concrete Quality Control

(3) Bechtel Specification X2AP01, Section 3.6, Material Testing

Se rvices

Forms were tight and clean and preplacement inspection was

indicated by the signed pour card. Areas inspected included

delivery, testing, conveying, placement and consolidation of

concrete.

The following concrete records were reviewed:

(1) Concrete Pour Card (Form CD-T-02-36)

(2) Batch Record Summary (Form CD-T-02-37)

(3) Summary of Concrete Placed (Form CD-T-02-39)

Concrete operations were continuously monitored by civil QC

personnel.

Concrete placement, testing and inspection were

conducted in accordance with applicable procedures.

The inspector noted that the pour card and applicable civil drawing

specified a 521(D-2) mix.

Bechtel Specification X2AP01, Division

C3, Section 3.6 describes the D-2 mix in Table II as a concrete mix

containing flyash designed for a strength of 5000 psi at 91-days.

Note 4 to T.ible II states that the design strength for all 5000 psi

and 6000 psi concrete is at 91-days. Discussions with site personnel

indicated all of the Category I concrete in the containment and

415

164

.

.

.-

3-

-

.

,

.

-3-

tendon gallery structures is either 5000 or 6000 psi with a 91-day

Section 3.8.1.6.1 of the Vogtle PSAR

design strength requirement.

specifies a 28-day compressive strength for containment concrete as

follows:

(a) Base mat and gallery - 5,000 psi at 28 days

(b) Cylinder and dome - 6,000 psi at 28 days

results for contain-

A review of concrete compressive strength test

ment structures and the auxiliary building indicated the 91-day,

5,000 psi, Category I concrete mix had a number of 28-day

Ali of the 91-day strengths

compressive strengths below 500" psi.iailure of the licensee to conform

reviewed were above 5000 psi. e ign strength requirement specified

to his commitment to a 28-day

in Section 3.8.1.6.1 of the PSAM is identified as Deviation

424-425/79-07-01, Concrete Design Commitments.

Preventive Maintenance System (Units 1 and 2)

b.

The inspector examined the preventive haintenance system as imple-

mented for mechanical and electrical equipment in storage on site.

The following documents provide guidance in this area:

Procedure MD-T-06, Inspection of Mechanical Equipment

(1)

Procedure MD-A-01, Receipt and Storage of Hechanical Equipment

(2)

Procedure ED-T-06, Electrical Material / Equipment Receipt,

(3)

Storage and Handling

(4) Specification X3AR01, Section E2, Station Service Equipment

The IE inspector reviewed maintenance records for various safety

related heat exchangers, valves and pumps in storage on site.

Preventive maintenance on these mechanical components had been

performed at the specified intervals in accordance with applicable

procedures.

The preventive maintenance records for the fellowing safety-related

electrical components were reviewed:

Containment Spray Pump Motor 1-206-P6-001

Containment Spray Pump Motor 1-206-P6-002

415

165

.

,

.

-4-

Safety Injection Pucp Motor 1-1204-P6-003

Safety Injection Pump Motor 1-1204-P6-004

Rod Drive MG Set 2-1606-M6-001

Rod Drive hG Set 2-1606-M6-002

2 specifies a monthly check of insulation

Procedure ED-T-06, Rev.

Nc record of

resistance for safety related motors and generators.

an insulation resistance check for either of the two Rod Drive

Motor-Generator Sets identified above existed for the month of

O dated

Specification X3AR01, Section E2, Rev.

March, 1979.

3-9-79 specifies in Section E2.10.1.C a weekly shaft rotation for

Records for the two

all safety related motors above 50 horsepower.

containment spray motors and the two safety injection pump motors

(all greater than 50 horsepower) indicate tnat no shaft rotation

Failure to

was performed from March 6, 1979 to April 3, 1979.

follow preventive maintenance procedures for safety related

electrical components is contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to

424-425/79-07-02,

10 CFR 50 and is identified as Infraction

Electrical Preventive Maintenance.

Reactor Cavity Liner Welding (Unit 2)

c.

Chicago Bridge and Iron Company (CBI) is the contractor responsible

Fabrication

for fabrication of the reactor cavity liner plate.

will be in accordance with the CBI QA Manual for ASMI Sectio

The inspector examined the production and

Products, Issue 6.

repair veld procedures for the reactor cavity liner plate welds,

welder qualification to these procedures, 'nd in process documenta-

Certified Material Test

tion of reactor cavity liner welding.

Reports for welding electrode heat numbers 422A7571, 412E7191 an

411X1461 were examined for compliance to Part C of Section II of

Storage and control of 6010 and 7018 welding

the ASME Code.

electrode were inspected. The Region II inspector observed in

process welding of the F-1 carbon steel reactor cavity liner plates

Welding was in accordance with welding procedure "PS

(Unit 2).

E6010(SKA) by qualifie welders.

No items of nonconpliance or deviation were identifttd in the above stea

inspected.

415

166

-

g

.-