|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20063N7471982-10-0606 October 1982 Motion for Termination of Proceedings.Util Decided to Cancel Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063N7591982-10-0606 October 1982 Withdrawal of Application for CP ML20055A7221982-07-15015 July 1982 Memorandum & Order Denying Jf Doherty 820615 Submittals, Treated as Motion to Reconsider ASLB 820602 Order.Motion Untimely Filed & Failed to Show Significance or Gravity of Issues ML20055A3551982-07-12012 July 1982 Amended Contention 59.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L4521982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Fails to Establish Timeliness &/Or Significance of Issues Sought to Be Raised.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5531982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Should Be Considered Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 820602 Order.Timeliness & Significance of Issues Not Established.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054J9371982-06-28028 June 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Request to Reopen Record. Request Improper & Insufficient to Support Relief.Commission Rules Cannot Be Circumvented by Refiling Same Argument After ASLB Ruling Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9861982-06-15015 June 1982 Motion to Reopen Record to Take Evidence on Contention 59. Gravity of Issues Warrants Reopening ML20054G0171982-06-15015 June 1982 Contention 50 Re Brown & Root Deficiencies in Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0861982-05-24024 May 1982 Response in Opposition to Util 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations.Contention Should Be Treated as Such,Not as Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20052H8621982-05-19019 May 1982 Motion to Strike J Doherty Reply to Applicant 820507 Response to Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58. Commission Rules Do Not Allow Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052H4441982-05-14014 May 1982 Reply Opposing Applicant 820507 Response to J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Contention Should Be Admitted W/Amends.Aslb Should Judge Conduct of Applicants. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F3121982-05-0707 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention Re Alleged Failure to Rept Design Defects.Substantively, Motion Is Motion to Reopen Record & Stds Have Not Been Met. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052D1221982-04-29029 April 1982 Findings of Fact on Supplemental Issues to Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4541982-04-22022 April 1982 Submittal of Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations at Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E0561982-04-21021 April 1982 Supplemental Findings of Fact on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050J1111982-04-0606 April 1982 Answers to Second & Third Sets of Interrogatories,Questions 29 & 8 Respectively,Re Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20050E2961982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Seventh Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050E2891982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Doherty Sixth Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20050C4211982-04-0202 April 1982 Objections to Request for Admissions.Requests Untimely, Irrelevant to Issues Before ASLB & Extremely & Unduly Burdensome.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4081982-03-31031 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Fifth Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4791982-03-29029 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Jf Doherty Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042C6181982-03-29029 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820315 Motion for ASLB to Subpoena Quadrex Corp Employee Witnesses as ASLB Witnesses. Request Is Based on Misperception of Scope of Reopened Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6431982-03-29029 March 1982 Motion for ASLB to Call DE Sells as Witness for Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Testimony Needed to Explain Why NRC Did Not Immediately Obtain Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5091982-03-26026 March 1982 Response to Jf Doherty 20th & 21st Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20042C5201982-03-25025 March 1982 Motion to Compel Discovery from Applicant & to Postpone Evidentiary Presentations at 820412 Hearings.Applicant Objections to Interrogatories Unsupported & Necessitate Hearings Be Delayed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0671982-03-25025 March 1982 Reply to Tx Pirg 820315 Addl Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0801982-03-25025 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5481982-03-23023 March 1982 Fourth Set of Requests for Admissions Re Quadrex Rept & Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0841982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Third Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0941982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Second Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A4791982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearings.Sufficient Grounds Not Provided to Justify Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2351982-03-17017 March 1982 Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2381982-03-15015 March 1982 Sixth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042B2451982-03-15015 March 1982 Motion for Subpoena of Quadrex Corp Employees.Testimony Necessary for Clear Understanding of Brown & Root Deficiencies Despite Util Supervision & Specific Steps Needed to Correct & Prevent Problems.W/Certificate of Svc ML20041F0761982-03-10010 March 1982 Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041F0871982-03-10010 March 1982 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearing on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Addl Time Needed to Complete Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049J6571982-03-0808 March 1982 Answers to First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1001982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1071982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1181982-03-0505 March 1982 Third Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Related Correspondence ML20041E1201982-03-0505 March 1982 Motion for Order Directing Applicant to Provide Forthcoming Bechtel Quadrex Rept Review.Rept Pertinent to Remaining Issue.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041E1741982-03-0505 March 1982 Brief Opposing R Alexander Appeal from ASLB 820112 Order Denying Petition to Intervene.Aslb Did Not Abuse Discretion in Denying Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E0711982-03-0404 March 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 21 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20049H8881982-03-0101 March 1982 Response Opposing D Marrack 820213 Motion for Review of Dates for Reopening Hearings & Continuance.No Commission Regulations or Atomic Energy Act Provisions Require Applicant Irrevocable Commitment.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5381982-02-22022 February 1982 Reply to Intervenors Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041C0671982-02-22022 February 1982 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 820209 Motion for Addl Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law.Motion Mooted by Tx Pirg Filing Proposed Findings on 820212. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5421982-02-17017 February 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1982-07-02
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20063N7471982-10-0606 October 1982 Motion for Termination of Proceedings.Util Decided to Cancel Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L4521982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Fails to Establish Timeliness &/Or Significance of Issues Sought to Be Raised.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5531982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Should Be Considered Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 820602 Order.Timeliness & Significance of Issues Not Established.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054J9371982-06-28028 June 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Request to Reopen Record. Request Improper & Insufficient to Support Relief.Commission Rules Cannot Be Circumvented by Refiling Same Argument After ASLB Ruling Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9861982-06-15015 June 1982 Motion to Reopen Record to Take Evidence on Contention 59. Gravity of Issues Warrants Reopening ML20053D0861982-05-24024 May 1982 Response in Opposition to Util 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations.Contention Should Be Treated as Such,Not as Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20052H8621982-05-19019 May 1982 Motion to Strike J Doherty Reply to Applicant 820507 Response to Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58. Commission Rules Do Not Allow Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052H4441982-05-14014 May 1982 Reply Opposing Applicant 820507 Response to J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Contention Should Be Admitted W/Amends.Aslb Should Judge Conduct of Applicants. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F3121982-05-0707 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention Re Alleged Failure to Rept Design Defects.Substantively, Motion Is Motion to Reopen Record & Stds Have Not Been Met. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6181982-03-29029 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820315 Motion for ASLB to Subpoena Quadrex Corp Employee Witnesses as ASLB Witnesses. Request Is Based on Misperception of Scope of Reopened Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6431982-03-29029 March 1982 Motion for ASLB to Call DE Sells as Witness for Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Testimony Needed to Explain Why NRC Did Not Immediately Obtain Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5201982-03-25025 March 1982 Motion to Compel Discovery from Applicant & to Postpone Evidentiary Presentations at 820412 Hearings.Applicant Objections to Interrogatories Unsupported & Necessitate Hearings Be Delayed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A4791982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearings.Sufficient Grounds Not Provided to Justify Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041F0871982-03-10010 March 1982 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearing on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Addl Time Needed to Complete Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1201982-03-0505 March 1982 Motion for Order Directing Applicant to Provide Forthcoming Bechtel Quadrex Rept Review.Rept Pertinent to Remaining Issue.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041E1741982-03-0505 March 1982 Brief Opposing R Alexander Appeal from ASLB 820112 Order Denying Petition to Intervene.Aslb Did Not Abuse Discretion in Denying Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049H8881982-03-0101 March 1982 Response Opposing D Marrack 820213 Motion for Review of Dates for Reopening Hearings & Continuance.No Commission Regulations or Atomic Energy Act Provisions Require Applicant Irrevocable Commitment.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041C0671982-02-22022 February 1982 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 820209 Motion for Addl Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law.Motion Mooted by Tx Pirg Filing Proposed Findings on 820212. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5901982-02-13013 February 1982 Motion for Postponement of All Action on CP Application Until Applicant States That Util Irrevocably Committed to Building Plant If CP Received.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040H0761982-02-0909 February 1982 Motion for 30 Addl Days to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Length of Record Necessitates Extension. Decision Would Not Be Delayed Since Addl Hearings to Be Held in Apr 1982 ML20040E2781982-01-29029 January 1982 Requests for Clarification Re R Alexander 811130 Petition to Intervene.J Silberg 820122 Ltr Indicates That Order Denying Petition Issued,But No Order Has Been Served.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039B7481981-12-17017 December 1981 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 811207 Motions for Addl Testimony, Further Development of Record & Admission of New Contention. Motion Superficial Attempt to Delay Proceeding & Totally Devoid of Merit.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M6441981-12-14014 December 1981 Response Opposing Doherty 811015 Renewed Motion for Addl Evidence on Tx Pirg Contention 31.Doherty Failed to Comply W/Aslb 811110 Order.Motion Is W/O Merit & Would Cause Unnecessary Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M6241981-12-0707 December 1981 Motion for Tx Pirg to Present Addl Evidence,To Order Applicant to Serve Tx Pirg W/Quadrex Rept & to Rule That Need for Power Is Tx Pirg Contention.Alternatively,Requests Admittance as Tx Pirg Contention.W/Certificate of Svc ML20039B0771981-12-0707 December 1981 Renewed Motion for Addl Evidence on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Applicant Technical Qualifications.Specifies Portions of Quadrex Rept,Indicating Organizational Changes That Should Be Made.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20038A8841981-11-20020 November 1981 Response Opposing Doherty 811106 Motion for Addl Testimony on Need for Power.Pleading Construed as Motion to Reopen Record.Burden of Explaining Why ASLB Would Reach Different Result Not Met.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20010F4791981-09-0303 September 1981 Response Opposing Further Consideration of Radon Releases. NRC Analysis of Radon Releases in Final Suppl to Fes Satisfies NEPA Requirements,Complies W/Commission 780414 Order & Supplies Sufficient Info.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010G1101981-09-0303 September 1981 Response to ASLB Request Re Positions on ALAB-640.Radon Emissions Determined by ALAB-640 Constitute Significant Addl Environ Impact.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010A1171981-08-0505 August 1981 Motion to Strike Marrack Prefiled Testimony.Testimony Is Not Specifically Responsive to F Sanders 810205-06 Testimony. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20009B2031981-07-0707 July 1981 Response in Opposition to Intervenor Doherty 810622 Request for Leave to File Contention 57.No Good Cause Shown for Late Filing & No Specificity Provided.W/Science News Article & Certificate of Svc ML20005B3801981-06-22022 June 1981 Request for Leave to File & Submission of Contention 57 Re Vulnerability of Control Sys to Electromagnetic Pulses. Issue Has Not Been Made Public Until Recently.W/Certificate of Svc ML19347F4941981-05-0808 May 1981 Reply Opposing Doherty 810423 Filing Re Contention 56, If Filing Is Motion to Add Late Filed Contention. Contention Refs Alleged Problem at Browns Ferry Which Is Not Applicable to Mark III Containments.W/Certificate of Svc ML19347F4661981-05-0808 May 1981 Response Opposing Doherty 810423 Motion to Reopen Record on Need for Power Contention.Aslb Should Issue Order That Motion Is Moot & Direct Applicant to Update Testimony on Need for Power Testimony Later.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003H9551981-04-29029 April 1981 Motion for Order Adopting Specific Procedures to Govern Conduct of cross-examination During Health & Safety Phase of Proceeding.Procedures Will Ensure cross-examination Not Cumulative.W/Proposed Order & Certificate of Svc ML19343D3891981-04-27027 April 1981 Motion to Strike I Bross 810331 Affidavit.Affidavit Does Not Respond to Ld Hamilton Supplemental Affidavits But Constitutes Personal Attack of Affiant.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20126J9451981-04-24024 April 1981 Motion Opposing Applicant 810422 Motion to Preclude Jm Scott Testimony.Tx Pirg & Intervenor Doherty Are Separate Parties ML20003H7981981-04-22022 April 1981 Motion for Addl Testimony & cross-examination on Conservation Techniques,Interconnection & Effects of Const Delay.Proceedings Have Not Addressed These Issues. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003H7471981-04-22022 April 1981 Motion to Preclude Jm Scott Testimony.Intent of ASLB 810407 Order Was to Preclude Scott from Having Dual Role of Atty & Witness for Any Other Party.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20126H9601981-04-0707 April 1981 Request for Order Directing Util to Reissue 810331 Pleading W/Correct Title.Defective Title Did Not Put All Parties on Notice ML20126H9641981-04-0707 April 1981 Response in Opposition to Util & NRC 810330 Motions to Disqualify Tx Pirg Counsel,Jm Scott.Counsel Will Appear as Expert Witness.Public Interest Requires Counsel Presence. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19347D9721981-03-31031 March 1981 Response to NRC & Applicant Responses to J Doherty 810222 Motion for Reconsideration of Admission of Contention 21. Filing of Motion Was Timely Under Circumstances. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345G4941981-03-30030 March 1981 Brief,In Form of Pleading,Addressing Need to Disqualify Tx Pirg Counsel Per Disciplinary Rules 5-101 & 5-102.Having Chosen to Appear as Witness,Scott Should Be Barred from Participation as Atty.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345G5831981-03-24024 March 1981 Response for Order Allowing Intervenors to File Id Bross Supplemental Affidavit to Respond to Ld Hamilton Affidavit on Behalf of Util.One Day Delay Should Be Excused Due to Intervenor Attempt to Comply W/Rules.W/Certificate of Svc ML20003D2161981-03-0404 March 1981 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 810217 Motions on Procedural Matters,Referral of Interlocutory Appeal,Certification of Various Issues & Removal of Aslb.Motion Contains Misrepresentations of Alab Rulings.W/Certificate of Svc ML19341D4801981-02-25025 February 1981 Response to Intervenor Doherty Third Supplemental Response to Motion for Summary Disposition.Intervenor Has No Right to File Late Responses,Shows No Good Cause & Info Has No Relationship to Affected Contentions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20003C3161981-02-17017 February 1981 Requests to ASLB for Interlocutory Appeal & Certification of Questions & to ASLAP for Direct Certification of Question Re Ability of Intervenors to cross-examine Witnesses. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003B0771981-02-0505 February 1981 Response in Opposition to Intervenor Jf Doherty Contention 55.Contention Does Not Address 10CFR2.714 Requirements & No Good Cause Established for Late Filing.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345E8521981-01-30030 January 1981 Suppl to 810129 Motion Requesting Reversal of 810123 Ruling Denying Intervenor Rentfro cross-examination Opportunity.Evidence Supporting Intervenor Discernible Interest in Issues Outlined.W/Certificate of Svc ML19345E5721981-01-29029 January 1981 Requests ASLB Reconsider Ruling Restricting cross-examination,for Interlocutory Appeal & Certification of Questions.Also Moves Aslab for Directed Certification of Questions & Appointment of New Aslb.W/Certificate of Svc ML19341B6021981-01-29029 January 1981 Response Opposing Intervenor Doherty 810123 Motion to Change Cross Examination Procedures.Repetitious cross- Examination Would Be Avoided If All Intervenors Attended All Proceedings.Certificate of Svc Encl 1982-07-02
[Table view] |
Text
'- '
-NRC PUBLIC DOCUMENT ROOM SEP 181979 9 WEE
~ .7. . s .........v' . ...... . ,;
Ndu. t IMLATORI w.. w. TON ,i SEP 18197.9 > j
'l BEFORE THE A"OMICI SAFETI AND LICE:. .G BOARD Dj. N N tat-In the Matter of I I
HOUSION LIGHTING CPO'#ER COI.' PANI J Docket No. 50-466 f
(Allens Creek Nuclear Generating I Station, Unit 1) 1 FRANCES PAVLOVIC'S AMENDED PETITION TO INTERVENE By letter of July 18, 1979, I interded to be considered as a full intervenor in the licenaing of construction of the above captioned facility by APPLICANT.
The following paragnphs represent ;y contentions regarding the hazards to health posed by locating the plant at the proposed sita.
- 1. CONfENTION REGARDING OVERLAPPING ZONES A. The fifty-mile zone of ACNGS would overlap that of South Texas Nuclear Project, exposing populations, lard and air in the overlap zone to double dcaages of radiation. Since this fact was not considered when calculati.g normal backgrourd radiation, I contend that the effects on the " maximum" individual ard his environment are inaccurate and misleading.
B. Although health effects are estimated for the entire country assuming a total nuclear ' economy, areas which are in nuclear plant overlap zones are not considered. For example, (S.D.15 FES August 1978) states, "It is believed that genetically related diseases....certain anemias, and congenital abnor.ulities... .and abnornalities in the desce rdents of workers and the general public from both normal operations and accidents would be perhaps twico the number of excess deaths due to cancer from total-body irrir.'.ation; . .."
l.146 001-
,~
7 010150 O V 7 G
Popalation of towns in tne overlup sora. (T.' m i' . mc 1978-1979' ,
San:.do 1,70 idfield 70 ar'ca:a 60'i 3ay City 13,54,7 sucony 3,025 En Vlock 1,051 Old Ocean 915
'! Colur.bia 3,330 ) ),
- 2. Colamoia 95 l lI h
- .'agne t 42 Luca Cit:r 111 i'ierco 49 ,s
?.illjo 51 -
Louise 310 _ _. . _.
Lunovan; 61 .
hu u A =
%. .fada 20'2 Esynt 26 Glen /lora 210 Garwood 975 2ce,c !aland 160 07.2,Ji? 20&,
c'loccer 159 3o1;ng 720
".narton 7,7U.
.a ::o . do e,)-
..C K tis 1, Jo
Dar.on 375 .3Gy u *uj Louville 1,662 f.c r.dle to n 641 hrtiy ?oint 30 toscaron 435 Dowalt 40 lich .ord 8 452 .
lesenaerg 14,995 Sugar Lurd 7,306 lu13 hear 200 .
'allis 1,103 1clo ' ake 3,587 -
lisaie 70
- 2. 3errard 1,500 .
e < .,
- Idf. . . b' .g m; T
.c G.
- s. c.
~
contoni that statictica cr.oulu ou :at:ared from audi.m or. m ac.D^ m of the abovo houlth off. ct., . . . . overlap zoraa in othor acetic.~ vJ ~':c country beforc u truo ec,ti; ato of the actria.ontal health offecta of <1.C '4-can be doter 0.iLOG.
. 1146 002
?00R ORSINAL
- 2. CO:C2?CION R2GA:CING NEAREST C2NT2R OF 20PULATION Rosenborg, population 14,995 (Tenn Alcarcc 1973-1979) is considered the nearest centor of population by ::RC. It is 15 miles from the site.
However, on Interstate 10 approximatoly 10 railes from the site, the average daily vehicle count is 16,230. Since each vohiclo would average more than one passengor, the average daily ranber of persons an I-10 could be well over 20,000. Sooly's population could be added to this figaro to give a more accurate count of the nearest center of population, since Scaly is located on I-10 approximatoly 10 milos from the sito and has a population of 3,211 (Tenn AMnac 1973-1979). Other major roads within ten milos of the site have average counts as follows: US 90, 2,320; Farm to t.tarket Road 14581,M0; Stato Highway 60 1,570, ard State Hi:nra/
36 2,930. The area arourri Scaly and all along I-10 is quite populous ard the population of Houston is apreading out to that area. For this reason, I contend that the proposed site is too close to a populated area.
- 3. CONTZ'. TION BASZD ON !l0ST APPROPRIATE USE OF TE SIT 2 ,
Since the larli on which it is oroposed that ACNGS be built is
/
presently arable and since the growing population of the area noods produco ard other food iteps that could be grown on the site ard shipped at 1 w energy cost to distribution centors in the area, I conterd it would :o
- coro healthful for the population of the area if the site remained avail-able for agricultural uso.
- 4. CC:."E::TIO:53AT A32qUA~'3 CONSDZRATION HAS NOT 323N GIVIN TO CONSERVATION AS ALTZRNATIVZ A. Applicant's projections of futuro need are based on present peak leads 1146 003
~
P00R ORIBlHL .
wEica i.avu been encouraged oy A9plicanc,'s ecvortising acG rate struc hrc.
"lous ton. . . .uses moro onorgy por capita than any other ci;,;-
in the world, as the city's privuto utility, Housten Lir;hting
& Power, proudly announcos in its advertisements."
- "The future of an illusion" by Potor Guntor in 72XAS 03SCRV2R, April 13, 1979 I conto.{ that Applicant's projocted ostimatos of nood are inflated una should bo revised aftor it has mado a bona fido offort to reduco ,waks of consumption.
B. I contend that Applicant should not be liconsed to construct another nuclear plant until it has mado a bona fido effort to encouraco conservauva of electricity ovur a fivo-yoar period.
"If the L~nited States were to rako a serious commitront to conservation, it might well consumo 30 to 40 porcent loss energy than it now doos."
C. 2xamplos of Conacrvation coasures that should be sponsored by Applicant.
- 1. applicant's rate structure should be changed so that thoso vino uso more pay moro. Since 51'] of Applicant's sales are to inaustrial customers, they should pay 51% of the cost; residontial 237,; commercial 203.
- 2. Anplicant should occourage the use of " house doctors ' as advocated recontly by a. United States Senator. These " doctors" would visit houses, diagnoso their energy problocs, proscribe the roredios needed. Upon completio*n of the proscribed "courso of treatment" utility bills ~ would be compared'with thoso of the preceding year to dotormino how much energy had been saved. If consumption of energy was reduced significantly, the
" doctor" could koop his foe. If not, he would have to rofund it to tho homoOwner.
Residential customors could be urged to use wachers, dryers, dish-vashers, and disposals during off-peak hours. Applicant's monthly mail-out to customers could list the off-peak hours. 1146 004 Applicants advertising should urgo customors to follow recommerdations of the fe,doral government with regard to thermostat settings.
~f-Applicant could suggest the use of lid ht meters in offico buildings with glass walls. .
Applicant could entor into co-gor: orating agreements with additioral industrial customors.
Applicant could consult with commercial buildings owners to phaso out supor-cooling and roheaters which tend to mako Houston's business environment colder indoors than out even in the winter months.
- 5. 00 iTE CION R2GARDI:!C OF7-SIT 2 f.:0!!ITORING R2QUIRZ'ENT
_I contend that Applicant chould be required to install an off-site radiation monitoring systom t'.at would also take into account weather conditions, with continuous computer processing. Such a system would erable a reliable esticate to be made of tho accumulated radiological dosage to the off-site population in the event of an abnormal release of radioactivity ard for long-term health projections.
Referenees: "!.*.onitor"--:iUCL2AR 2::GII.IRI: G, August,1979 ard "The 7tay to Save I;uclear Powor" by R. A. 3rightsen in FORTU:3, Sept.10, 1979.
The above references contain many valuabio suggestions regarding operation, communications, and public relat!.ons, ard I hope they will be adopted before the plant is licensod te operato. I mention them at this time because I understand that oporations licenses are often pro forra after a plant has boon built.
- 6. CONTE:iTIO:!5 REGARDING RAIL TRANSPORT OF I.~JCL2AR ?!ASTS I contend that railroads to be used for transport of nuclear waste be thorougN17 evaluated ard physically improved beforehard. Since sv 1146 005
.l}yo w o
& }-(e
. 7 to 10 rail shipments of spent fuel consisting of 42 tons of spent fua gid 20 tons of cladding will be traveling from ACNGS over Texas railroads, they will be subject to railroad crosairc accidents, derailments, and other problems common to Texas railroads. According to ER 5.3.4.2., and 7Jt 5.3.4.2.2, modo ard r'outo of transport of other solid wasto will be similar to that of the s; 7t fuel; the location of the reprocessing plant ard the route traversed by the spent fuel to the roprocessing plant has no' yot' boon choson.
- 7. CONTE!; TION REGARDING CU:JULATIVE EFFECTS OF ADDITIONAL 'JASTE FRO:.I OTHER NUCLEAR PLAI;TS ALONG THE RAILROU"!: ROUTES 'Al STORAGE OR REPROCESSING In addition to the proposed shipments of nuclear wasto from ACNCS that might concoivably pass throu;;h populated areas, I contend that I;RC requirements regarding radiolo'gical exposuro lovols could bo excoodod if the same rail linos aro usod to ship wasto from other nuclear planta.
_IJerefore contord that licensing should be delayod until rail routos are determined ard the cumulativo radiological effects calculated.
8.
00tiTENTION RECARDING PROTECTION OF PUBLIC AT RAILRCAD CROSSINGS Persons in Texas have boon killod by trains at railroad crossings throughout the stato, and the crossings are often lef t in disrepair after an accid,ent. Texg Chsorver article, " Crossing Over" by Jeanetto Carrett, 1976 April 27, 1979, quotes a/ Department of Transportation survey which" points out +,ha',
only 3,424 of the crossings have any sort of 'activo ' warning system in place--either flashing lights, bella, or gatos that block crossings whon a train is approaching. !Jost of them are marked only by
, the familiar black ard whito crossbuck sign to notify motorists that there's a crossing ahead. DOT found that 1,113 Texas crossings have no markings of a ry kird. " ~
D{~
"D g(f N fD [ F B 0
?
~
. 1146 006
-/
I conterd that all crossings used by trains hauling nuclear waste should be inspected prior to each shipment and adequate protection be provided to the motoring public.
- 9. CONTENTIONS REGARDING USE OF ALTERNATIVE SOURCES'0F ENERG'l Although various forms of alternative erorgy sources were described and abandoned in the staff reports, J conterd they were considering each individual alternative source independently and not as part of a multi-source system.
I_ further contend that a decentralized system utdizing alternati<e sources in conjunction with the existing system would be less wasteful of energy, especially electricity; use less non-rerawable resources; be more economical to build, maintain and operate; and be safer to workers and populations now without posing any health threats to future generations .
Since Applicant serves 70 or more municipalities, it has ample t
opportunities to supplement its present system with one or more alternative sources ia each locality.
Doctor Wayne Willey's financial analysis of Pacific Gas & Electric Co., (cited by the Envirormental Defense Fund in its August 1979 furd
, drive brochure) found thut the company "could cut 90", of its planned new nuclear and coal plants by shifting investments to presently available alternative energy sources--and meet all of the projected energy meds M h ,qo,aji to the company and the public. '
li46 007 e
0
- 10. CONTENTION REGARDING DELAY OF LICENSING TI , AFTER ntI COMMISSION FINAL REFORT I contend that kCNGS construction should not be ticensed until af ter the tree Mib Island Commission has made its final report ard recommenda-tions. Meanwhile, Applicant may gain valuable experience in operating the TSNP now under construction at a sito less populous than the proposed ACNGS since much of its 50-mile zono ir cludes coastal wators.
I listened to the 31I Commission hearings and was i prossed by the following facts: The control room's displayed inforration went around a corner so that it was impossible for the operator to get all portinont 1
, information from one viewooint. The computer was outdated. The oporators were overconfide..t and incapable of making split-second decisions based on an education in nuclear engineering at the level required by the situation.
CONTENTION REGARDING I."JCLEAR 'JASTE STORAGE
- 11. The disposal of radioactive wasto continue to be a problem tb,oughout the country. I conte _nd that until adoquate provisions can be made for the long-term safe contairnent or noutralization of such waste, both of' fuel and of cladding or liquid nuclear waste, licensing m zr of ACNGS at the proposed sito4be postponod.
INSEn 1146 008 S 5.44 Radiolonical imnact on man Page 5.5-31 "....the actual radiological impact of plant operation ray result in dosos close to the dose design objectivos. Evon if this 'tuation exists the individual dosos will still be very small whc. - . narod to ratural backgror.nd dosos (~92 milirom/ year) or of the doso lic.its specified in 10 CFR 20 As a reault, tho staff concluded that thoro will be no mot.aurable radiological impact on ran from routino operation of the ACNGS."
t I conterd this statement is misleading since it does not consider the amount of additioral radiological impact to which those in the overlapping zonas will be subjected. 2 m ca # --<- /9 2Cr bd AJG'M% : .C ,
_ -Lefe46 Era. o ; c C N1 vlo vic.
~
~
t' N. . _ _ . . ,
UNI"ED STATES OF A!/. ERICA NUCLEAR REGULATJRY C0:2.IISSION BEFORE TFE AM. TIC SAFETY A?O LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of I I
HOUS"0N LIGHTING & POWER C0?.tPANY I Docket No. 50-466 -
1 (Allen * " reek Nuclear Generating i Sta tio. Jnit1) 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the forogoing Amendment to Frances Pavlovie's Petition to Intervono in the above-captioned proceeding were served on the fo11owing by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this 14th day of September,1979.
Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety ard Licensing Board Parol
, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 '
Secretary of the Commission (20 copies)'
Attention Docketing a Service Se<ation Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Richard Lowerce, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General for the State of Texas '
P.O. Box 12548 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Steve Schinki, Esq.
Staff Counsel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cox. mission Washington, D. C. 20555
- John F. Doherty 4438t Leelani '
Houston, TX 77023
a Carro Hirderstein 8737 Link Terrace Houston, TX 77025 7layne E. Rentfro P. O. Box 1335 Rosenb' g, TX 77471 James M. Scott, Jr.
8302 Albacore Houston, TX 77074 Brerda McCorkle
, 6140 Darnell Houston, TX 77074 WW France 2 Pavlovio 111 Datonia Bellaire, Texas 77401 i
e 6
.i
,