ML18206A561
| ML18206A561 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Consolidated Interim Storage Facility |
| Issue date: | 07/19/2018 |
| From: | Consolidated Interim Storage Facility |
| To: | Division of Spent Fuel Management |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18206A595 | List:
|
| References | |
| E-52247 | |
| Download: ML18206A561 (95) | |
Text
WCS\\FINAL I 150521 R161212_CISF REPORT APPENDIX B SOIL STUDY Cii REVISION 2 12 DECEMBER 2016
USDA United States
- ==-:-==;; Department of Agriculture NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants 0 --------8,000 ft APP B-1 Custom Soil Resource Report for Andrews County, Texas, and Lea County, New Mexico wcs December 22, 2015
Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http://
offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951 ).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means 2
APP B-2
for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
3 APP B-3
Contents Preface.................................................................................................................... 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made.................................................................................. 5 Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 7 Soil Map................................................................................................................ 8 Legend................................................................................................................ 11 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 12 Map Unit Descriptions........................................................................................ 12 Andrews County, Texas.................................................................................. 15 BcB-Blakeney and Conger soils, gently undulating.................................. 15 FdB-Faskin and Douro soils, gently undulating........................................ 16 lmB-lma loamy fine sand, Oto 3 percent slopes....................................... 18 JPC-Jalmar-Penwell association, undulating............................................ 19 KmB-Kimbrough soils, gently undulating.................................................. 21 RaB-Ratliff soils, gently undulating........................................................... 22 TwB-Triomas and Wickett soils, gently undulating................................... 23 Lea County, New Mexico................................................................................ 25 AB-Amarillo-Arvana loamy fine sands association................................... 25 BO-Brownfield-Springer association......................................................... 27 BS-Brownfield-Springer association, hummocky...................................... 29 KM-Kermit soils and dune land, 0 to 12 percent slopes............................ 31 MU-Mixed alluvial land.............................................................................. 32 PG-Portales and gomez fine sandy loams................................................ 34 SE-Simona fine sandy loam, Oto 3 percent slopes.................................. 36 SR-Simona-Upton association.................................................................. 37 References............................................................................................................40 4
APP B-4
How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.
Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the 5
APP B-5
Custom Soil Resource Report individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
6 APP B-6
Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
7 APP B-7
678500 679400 680300 681200 682100 32" 28'32"N
~
~
M
- r
~
M
(.
32" 2S37'N 678500 679400 680300 681200 682100 Map Scale: 1:26,400 ifprinlEd on B landscape (17" x 11") sheet N
=========-----------------================Meters 2100 0
700 1400 350 A
=======-------------=============FOO:
0 1000 2000 4000 6000 Map projection: Web Merratnr Comer mordina!Es: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map Index Sheet 683000 1
~
~
683000 8
APP B-8 683900 684800 685700 686600 687500 32° 28' 32"N
~
~
M
~
M 32° 2S 37" N 683900 684800 685700 686600 687500
680800 681200 681600 682000 32° 28' 24" N 32° 27 5 N 680800 681200 681600 682000 Map Scale: 1:12,000 if printed on B landscape (17" x 11") sheet.
N
========----------------===============Meters 900 300 600 0
150 A
=======--------------=============~ Feet 3000 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 0
500 1000 2000 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer mordinates: WGS84 682400 682400 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map Map sheet 1 of 2 682800 683200 682800 683200 Joins sheet 2 9
APP B-9 683600 684000 684400 683600 684000 684400 684800 684800 Map Sheet Location 685200
~
§ 32° 28' 24" N
~
~
~; 32° 275N
681200 681600 682000 682400 32° 27 5 N F
32° 25' 45 N 681200 681600 682000 682400 Map Scale: 1:12,000 if printed on B landscape (17" x 11") sheet.
N 0........ <========-----------------================Meters 900 150 300 600 A
=======--------------==============Feet 3000 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 0
500 1000 2000 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer mordinates: WGS84 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map Map sheet 2 of 2 Joins sheet 1 682800 683200 682800 683200 10 APP B-10 683600 683600 684000 684400 684800 685200 32° 27 5 N 32° 25'45" N 684000 684400 684800 685200 2
Map Sheet Location
Custom Soil Resource Report MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI)
D Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils D
Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines
[]
Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features
~ Blowout Ill Borrow Pit Clay Spot 0
Closed Depression x
Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot 0
Landfill
/\\.
Lava Flow Marsh or swamp
'R' Mine or Quarry 0
Miscellaneous Water 0
Perennial Water v
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot 0
Sinkhole Jll Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation ttt Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography 11 APP B-11 MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at scales ranging from 1 :20,000 to 1 :31,700.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements.
Source of Map:
Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL:
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System:
Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area:
Survey Area Data:
Soil Survey Area:
Survey Area Data:
Andrews County, Texas Version 13, Sep 18, 2015 Lea County, New Mexico Version 12, Sep 29, 2015 Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area.
These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area boundaries.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows)for map scales 1 :50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed:
Data not available.
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Andrews County, Texas (TX003)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI BcB Blakeney and Conger soils, 795.1 gently undulating FdB Faskin and Douro soils, gently 40.8 undulating lmB Ima loamy fine sand, Oto 3 61.8 percent slopes JPC Jalmar-Penwell association, 907.7 undulating KmB Kimbrough soils, gently 21.2 undulating RaB Ratliff soils, gently undulating 342.7 TwB Trio mas and Wickett soils, gently 109.6 undulating Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 2,278.8 Totals for Area of Interest 2,780.3 Lea County, New Mexico (NM025)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AB Amarillo-Arvana loamy fine 12.5 sands association BO Brownfield-Springer association 47.5 BS Brownfield-Springer association, 134.3 hummocky KM Kermit soils and dune land, O to 11.5 12 percent slopes MU Mixed alluvial land 19.4 PG Portales and gomez fine sandy 17.9 loams SE Simona fine sandy loam, Oto 3 117.0 percent slopes SR Simona-Upton association 141.3 Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 501.5 Totals for Area of Interest 2,780.3 Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
12 APP B-12 28.6%
1.5%
2.2%
32.6%
0.8%
12.3%
3.9%
82.0%
100.0%
0.5%
1.7%
4.8%
0.4%
0.7%
0.6%
4.2%
5.1 %
18.0%
100.0%
Custom Soil Resource Report A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
13 APP B-13
Custom Soil Resource Report An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
14 APP B-14
Custom Soil Resource Report Andrews County, Texas BcB-Blakeney and Conger soils, gently undulating Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: d53f Elevation: 1,500 to 3,600 feet Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 68 degrees F Frost-free period: 210 to 240 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Blakeney and similar soils: 49 percent Conger and similar soils: 4 7 percent Minor components: 4 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Blakeney Setting Landform: Ridges, divides Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex, linear Parent material: Loamy eolian deposits in the blackwater draw formation of pleistocene age overlying calcareous loamy alluvium in the ogallala formation of miocene-pliocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 18 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 18 to 32 inches: cemented material H3 - 32 to 68 inches: gravelly loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 7 to 20 inches to petrocalcic Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 70 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.0 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: Shallow 12-17" PZ (R077DY048TX) 15 APP B-15
Custom Soil Resource Report Description of Conger Setting Landform: Ridges, divides Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex, linear Parent material: Loamy eolian deposits in the blackwater draw formation of pleistocene age overlying calcareous loamy alluvium in the ogallala formation of miocene-pliocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 17 inches: loam H2 - 17 to 39 inches: cemented material H3 - 39 to 75 inches: gravelly loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 8 to 20 inches to petrocalcic Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 70 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.9 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: Shallow 12-17" PZ (R077DY048TX)
Minor Components Unnamed Percent of map unit: 4 percent FdB-Faskin and Douro soils, gently undulating Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: d53h Elevation: 2,750 to 3,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 57 to 70 degrees F Frost-free period: 210 to 240 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland 16 APP B-16
Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Composition Faskin and similar soils: 63 percent Douro and similar soils: 21 percent Minor components: 16 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Faskin Setting Landform: Plains Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy eolian deposits from the blackwater draw formation of pleistocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 8 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 8 to 42 inches: sandy clay loam H3 - 42 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 50 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.5 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy Loam 12-17" PZ (R077DY047TX)
Description of Douro Setting Landform: Plains Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy eolian deposits in the blackwater draw formation of pleistocene age overlying calcareous loamy alluvium in the ogallala formation of miocene-pliocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 9 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 9 to 30 inches: sandy clay loam H3 - 30 to 51 inches: cemented material H4 - 51 to 75 inches: gravelly loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent 17 APP B-17
Custom Soil Resource Report Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to petrocalcic Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 80 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.3 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Sandy Loam 12-17" PZ (R077DY04 ?TX)
Minor Components Unnamed Percent of map unit: 16 percent lmB-lma loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: d53j Elevation: 4,000 to 4,600 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 57 to 63 degrees F Frost-free period: 180 to 210 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Ima and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Ima Setting Landform: Plains Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy alluvium and eolian deposits derived from calcareous sandstone of triassic and/or permian age Typical profile H1 - Oto 14 inches: loamy fine sand H2 - 14 to 55 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 55 to 80 inches: very fine sandy loam 18 APP B-18
Custom Soil Resource Report Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 4.0 Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.1 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6c Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
JPC-Jalmar-Penwell association, undulating Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: d53k Elevation: 2,400 to 3,500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F Frost-free period: 210 to 240 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Jalmar and similar soils: 56 percent Penwell and similar soils: 40 percent Minor components: 4 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Jalmar Setting Landform: Sand sheets Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy eolian deposits of holocene age over loamy eolian deposits from the blackwater draw formation of pleistocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 14 inches: fine sand H2 - 14 to 26 inches: fine sand H3 - 26 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 8 percent 19 APP B-19
Custom Soil Resource Report Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 25 percent Available water storage in profile: Low (about 6.0 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
Description of Penwell Setting Landform: Sand sheets Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy eolian deposits of holocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 13 inches: fine sand H2 - 13 to 80 inches: fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.6 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Sand Hills 12-17" PZ (R077DY045TX)
Minor Components Unnamed Percent of map unit: 4 percent 20 APP B-20
Custom Soil Resource Report KmB-Kimbrough soils, gently undulating Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: d531 Elevation: 2,000 to 5,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 57 to 75 degrees F Frost-free period: 175 to 215 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Kimbrough and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kimbrough Setting Landform: Plains Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous, loamy alluvium in the ogallala formation of miocene-pliocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 8 inches: loam H2 - 8 to 31 inches: cemented material Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 4 to 20 inches to petrocalcic Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 10 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 1.2 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: Shallow 12-17" PZ (R077DY048TX) 21 APP B-21
Custom Soil Resource Report RaB-Ratliff soils, gently undulating Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: d53s Elevation: 2,500 to 3,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 70 degrees F Frost-free period: 210 to 240 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Ratliff and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Ratliff Setting Landform: Plains Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous, loamy eolian deposits from the blackwater draw formation of pleistocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 10 inches: loam H2 - 10 to 25 inches: clay loam H3 - 25 to 80 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 50 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.5 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Limy Upland 12-17" PZ (R077DY042TX) 22 APP B-22
Custom Soil Resource Report TwB-Triomas and Wickett soils, gently undulating Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: d53w Elevation: 2,300 to 3,500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 68 degrees F Frost-free period: 210 to 240 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Triomas and similar soils: 78 percent Wickett and similar soils: 16 percent Minor components: 6 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Triomas Setting Landform: Plains Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy eolian deposits from the blackwater draw formation of pleistocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 16 inches: fine sand H2 - 16 to 68 inches: sandy clay loam H3 - 68 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 30 percent Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.5 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
Description of Wickett Setting Landform: Plains 23 APP B-23
Custom Soil Resource Report Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy eolian deposits overlying calcareous, loamy alluvium in the ogallala formation of miocene-pliocene age Typical profile H1 - Oto 16 inches: loamy fine sand H2 - 16 to 33 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 33 to 53 inches: cemented material H4 - 53 to 67 inches: gravelly loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to petrocalcic Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 85 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.5 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
Minor Components Unnamed Percent of map unit: 6 percent 24 APP B-24
Custom Soil Resource Report Lea County, New Mexico AB-Amarillo-Arvana loamy fine sands association Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: dmnr Elevation: 3,500 to 4,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 58 to 60 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 205 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Amarillo and similar soils: 50 percent Arvana and similar soils: 40 percent Minor components: 1 O percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Amarillo Setting Landform: Plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous alluvium and/or calcareous eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - O to 8 inches: loamy fine sand Bt - 8 to 36 inches: sandy clay loam Bk - 36 to 60 inches: marly loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 50 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.7 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R077CY056NM) 25 APP B-25
Custom Soil Resource Report Description of Arvana Setting Landform: Plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous alluvium and/or calcareous eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - O to 6 inches: loamy fine sand Bt - 6 to 28 inches: sandy clay loam Bkm - 28 to 38 inches: cemented material BCk - 38 to 60 inches: sandy clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to petrocalcic Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Low to moderately high (0.01 to 0.60 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 50 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.8 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 6e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R077CY056NM)
Minor Components Portales Percent of map unit: 2 percent Ecological site: Limy Upland 16-21" PZ (R077CY028TX)
Brownfield Percent of map unit: 2 percent Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
Patricia Percent of map unit: 2 percent Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R077CY056NM)
Gomez Percent of map unit: 2 percent Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R077CY056NM)
Mansker Percent of map unit: 1 percent 26 APP B-26
Custom Soil Resource Report Ecological site: Limy Upland 16-21" PZ (R077CY028TX)
Tivoli Percent of map unit: 1 percent Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
BO-Brownfield-Springer association Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: dmpj Elevation: 3,500 to 4,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 58 to 60 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 205 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Brownfield and similar soils: 60 percent Springer and similar soils: 30 percent Minor components: 1 O percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Brownfield Setting Landform: Plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - Oto 22 inches: fine sand Bt-22 to 60 inches: sandy clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.0 inches) 27 APP B-27
Custom Soil Resource Report Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 6e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
Description of Springer Setting Landform: Plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - Oto 14 inches: loamy fine sand Bt - 14 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam Bk - 60 to 79 inches: fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 6.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 20 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.1 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
Minor Components Patricia Percent of map unit: 4 percent Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R077CY056NM)
Amarillo Percent of map unit: 4 percent Ecological site: Sandy 16-21" PZ (R077CY035TX)
Tivoli Percent of map unit: 1 percent Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
Gomez Percent of map unit: 1 percent Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R077CY056NM) 28 APP B-28
Custom Soil Resource Report BS-Brownfield-Springer association, hummocky Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: dmpk Elevation: 3,500 to 4,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 58 to 60 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 205 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Brownfield and similar soils: 65 percent Springer and similar soils: 25 percent Minor components: 1 O percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Brownfield Setting Landform: Plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - Oto 22 inches: fine sand Bt-22 to 60 inches: sandy clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.0 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 6e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX) 29 APP B-29
Custom Soil Resource Report Description of Springer Setting Landform: Plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - O to 7 inches: loamy fine sand Bt - 7 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam Bk - 60 to 79 inches: fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 6.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 20 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
Minor Components Amarillo Percent of map unit: 4 percent Ecological site: Sandy 16-21" PZ (R077CY035TX)
Arvana Percent of map unit: 3 percent Ecological site: Sandy 16-21" PZ (R077CY035TX)
Tivoli Percent of map unit: 2 percent Ecological site: Sandy 12-17" PZ (R077DY046TX)
Dune land Percent of map unit: 1 percent 30 APP B-30
Custom Soil Resource Report KM-Kermit soils and dune land, 0 to 12 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: dmpx Elevation: 3,000 to 4,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 60 to 62 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 205 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Dune land: 45 percent Kermit and similar soils: 45 percent Minor components: 1 O percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kermit Setting Landform: Dunes Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Convex, linear, concave Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Calcareous sandy eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - O to 8 inches: fine sand C - 8 to 60 inches: fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 12 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Excessively drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very high (20.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 3 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.1 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e Hydrologic Soil Group: A 31 APP B-31
Custom Soil Resource Report Ecological site: Sandhills (R042XC022NM)
Description of Dune Land Setting Landform: Dunes Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Convex, linear, concave Across-slope shape: Convex Typical profile A - O to 6 inches: fine sand C - 6 to 60 inches: fine sand Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Minor Components Palomas Percent of map unit: 3 percent Ecological site: Loamy Sand (R042XC003NM)
Pyote Percent of map unit: 3 percent Ecological site: Loamy Sand (R042XC003NM)
Maljamar Percent of map unit: 2 percent Ecological site: Loamy Sand (R042XC003NM)
Wink Percent of map unit: 2 percent Ecological site: Loamy Sand (R042XC003NM)
MU-Mixed alluvial land Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: dmqg Elevation: 3,600 to 4,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 58 to 62 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 205 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Ustifluvents and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent 32 APP B-32
Custom Soil Resource Report Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Ustifluvents Setting Landform: Drainageways Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed alluvium derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile C - O to 60 inches: stratified sand to loamy fine sand to loam to sandy clay loam to clay loam to clay Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Negligible Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to very high (0.06 to 20.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 20 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 5 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to moderately saline (0.0 to 8.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Bottomland (R042XC017NM)
Minor Components Amarillo Percent of map unit: 7 percent Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R077CY056NM)
Portales Percent of map unit: 7 percent Ecological site: Limy Upland 16-21" PZ (R077CY028TX)
Play as Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Flood-plain playas Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Concave 33 APP B-33
Custom Soil Resource Report PG-Portales and gomez fine sandy loams Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: dmqm Elevation: 3,600 to 4,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 58 to 60 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 205 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Portales and similar soils: 45 percent Gomez and similar soils: 45 percent Minor components: 1 O percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gomez Setting Landform: Plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous alluvium and/or calcareous lacustrine deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - O to 6 inches: fine sandy loam Bk1 - 6 to 22 inches: fine sandy loam Bk2 - 22 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (2.00 to 6.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 50 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.2 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c Hydrologic Soil Group: A 34 APP B-34
Custom Soil Resource Report Ecological site: Sandy 16-21" PZ (R077CY035TX)
Description of Portales Setting Landform: Plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous alluvium and/or calcareous eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - O to 8 inches: fine sandy loam Bk - 8 to 60 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 50 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.0 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy 16-21" PZ (R077CY035TX)
Minor Components Lea Percent of map unit: 4 percent Ecological site: Limy Upland 16-21" PZ (R077CY028TX)
Arvan a Percent of map unit: 3 percent Ecological site: Sandy 16-21" PZ (R077CY035TX)
Amarillo Percent of map unit: 2 percent Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R077CY056NM)
Play as Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Playa floors Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down-slope shape: Concave 35 APP B-35
Custom Soil Resource Report Across-slope shape: Concave SE-Simona fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: dmr2 Elevation: 3,000 to 4,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 58 to 62 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 205 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Simona and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Simona Setting Landform: Plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - O to 8 inches: fine sandy loam Bk-8 to 16 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam Bkm - 16 to 26 inches: cemented material Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 7 to 20 inches to petrocalcic Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very high Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 35 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.0 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 6s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s 36 APP B-36
Custom Soil Resource Report Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: Shallow Sandy (R042XC002NM)
Minor Components Kimbrough Percent of map unit: 7 percent Ecological site: Very Shallow 16-21" PZ (R077CY037TX)
Lea Percent of map unit: 7 percent Ecological site: Limy Upland 16-21" PZ (R077CY028TX)
Play as Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Playa floors Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Concave SR-Simona-Upton association Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: dmr3 Elevation: 3,000 to 4,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 58 to 62 degrees F Frost-free period: 190 to 205 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Simona and similar soils: 50 percent Upton and similar soils: 35 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Simona Setting Landform: Ridges Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - 0 to 8 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam Bk - 8 to 16 inches: fine sandy loam Bkm - 16 to 26 inches: cemented material 37 APP B-37
Custom Soil Resource Report Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 7 to 20 inches to petrocalcic Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 50 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 1.9 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: Shallow Sandy (R042XC002NM)
Description of Upton Setting Landform: Ridges Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile A - 0 to 8 inches: gravelly loam Bkm - 8 to 18 inches: cemented material BCk-18 to 60 inches: very gravelly loam Properties and qualities Slope: Oto 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 7 to 20 inches to petrocalcic Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Medium Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Low to moderately high (0.01 to 0.60 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 75 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 2.0 Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 0.9 inches)
Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 6e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s 38 APP B-38
Custom Soil Resource Report Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: Shallow (R042XC025NM)
Minor Components Stegall Percent of map unit: 5 percent Ecological site: Limy Upland 16-21" PZ (R077CY028TX)
Kimbrough Percent of map unit: 5 percent Ecological site: Very Shallow 16-21" PZ (R077CY037TX)
Slaughter Percent of map unit: 4 percent Ecological site: Limy Upland 16-21" PZ (R077CY028TX)
Play as Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Playa floors Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Concave 39 APP B-39
References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasi las, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs 142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs 142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=n res 142 p2_ 053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs 142p2_05337 4 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/land u se/rangepastu re/?cid =stelprd b 1043084 40 APP B-40
Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs 142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs 142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf 41 APP B-41
WCS\\FINAL I 150521 R161212_CISF REPORT APPENDIX C CALCULATIONS Cii REVISION 2 12 DECEMBER 2016
WCS\\FINAL\\150521 R16120B_CURVE NO wcs File: 15a52 - CN Revised 12/a8/2a16 CURVE NUMBER
~~
c**
,4oF~
II
,t:>~
<l' Crlc"lat1v~s APPENDIXC i:l-:J.. "....,.:si~ fl.ff:
wcs -CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS
~WM G.,R!!~PlYK...,, I POST-DEVELOPMENT CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS r-63724
'"°1~ 1'1( /lf O~fG
~~<>/.~
DES CHK
~8a~~J!ao**~c,J DD 9/6/2a16 DD 3/8/2a16
\\~~-
Reference:
- 1. drawing: S:\\CAD\\WCS\\ 15a52 CISF Floodplain\\Engineering\\ 15a52 - P CN.dwg Drainage Area - P DA 1 C
T
& H d I. C d'.
over voe y_ ro 091c on 1t1on Desert Shrub Poor Desert Shrub Poor Desert Shrub Poor Desert Shrub Poor Total COMPOSITE CN Drainage Area - P DA 2 C
T
& H d I. C d'.
over 1vpe IV4 ro og1c on 1llon Desert Shrub Poor Desert Shrub Poor Desert Shrub Poor Desert Shrub Poor Total COMPOSITE CN
- 2. Soil information taken from US Department Of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service Custom Soil Resource Report For Andrews County, Texas, And Lea County, New Mexico, dated December 22, 2a15
- 3. Texas Engineering Technical Note. No. 210-18-TX5, Estimating Runoff for Conservation Practices, 199a A=
100.86 Acres S 'IT H d S. G 01 y_Qe y_.
011 rouE Area JPC B/A***
55.a8 Imp. Cover a.aa TwB B
12.79 Imo. Cover a.aa BCB D
13.19 Imo. Cover a.aa RaB B
17.8a Imp. Cover 2.aa 1aa.9 79 A=
46.1 Acres S *1 T H d S *1 G A
01 y_Qe y_.
01 rOUQ rea BcB D
34.88 Imo. Cover a.aa SE D
7.88 Imo. Cover a.aa SR D
a.84 Imp. Cover a.ao RaB B
2.5a Imp. Cover o.oa 46.1 87 APP C-1 0.158 sq mi c N*
Area xCN 77 4241.2 98 a.a 77 984.8 98 a.a 88 116a.7 98 a.a 77 137a.6 98 196.a 7953.3 ARC I Adjustment**
(6a Min.)
62 0.072 sq mi ARC I Adjustment**
rea x CN*
A CN (6a Min.)
88 3a69.8 98 a.a 88 693.a a
a.a 88 73.7 a
a.a 77 192.2 98 a.a 4a28.7 73 ARC Ill Adjustment**
(6a Min.)
91 ARC Ill Adjustment**
(6aMin.)
95 REVISION 2 12 DECEMBER 2016
WCS\\F INAL \\ 15052\\
R161208_CURVE NO APPENDIX C WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS Drainage Area - P DA 3 A=
42.8 Acres 0.067 sq mi Cover Type & Hydrologic Condition Soil Type Hyd. Soil Group Area CN*
Area x CN Desert Shrub Poor RaB B
2.95 77 227.1 Imp. Cover 0.00 0
0.0 Desert Shrub Poor BcB D
34.20 88 3009.6 Imp. Cover 5.65 98 553.8 Total 42.8 3790.5 COMPOSITE CN 89 Drainage Area - P DA 4 A=
679.34 Acres 1.061 sq mi Cover Tvpe & Hvdrolooic Condition Soil Tvpe Hvd. Soil Group Area CN*
Stockpile (Bare soil)
D 60.67 94 Desert Shrub Poor JPC B/A***
150.67 77 Imp. Cover 21.88 98 Desert Shrub Poor RaB B
215.19 77 Imp. Cover 4.48 98 Desert Shrub Poor BcB D
98.43 88 Imp. Cover 54.29 98 Desert Shrub Poor TwB B
25.88 77 Imp. Cover 47.81 98 Total 679.3 COMPOSITE CN 84
- Taken from Table 2c of Texas Engineering Technical Note, Hydrology, No. 210-18-TX5, Estimating Runoff for Conservation Practices
(60 Min.)
76 ARC I Adjustment**
(60 Min.)
68 ARC Ill Adjustment**
(60 Min.)
96 ARC Ill Adjustment**
(60 Min.)
93 CJi REVISION 2 12 DECEMBER 2016
WCS\\FINAL\\150521 R16120B_TCIP PMP wcs DES DD 9/6/2016 Revised 12/08/16 DD APPENDIX C WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA TIME OF CONCENTRATION CHK DD 3/8/2016
Reference:
- 1. United States Department of Ag riculture, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds TR-55, 1986
- 2. Reference Drawing S:ICAD\\WCS\\15052 CISF Floodplain\\Engineering\\15052 - P Hydraulic Cales PMP.dwg P DA 1 P DA2 P DA3 Drainage Area A
100.86 (acres)
A 46.1 (acres)
A 42.8 (acres) 0.158 (sqmi) 0072 (sq mi) 0.067 (sqmi)
Sheet Flow Manning's roughness coef. 1 n
0.1 5 nla n
0.011 n/a n
0.011 nla Flow Length L
300 feet L
300 feet L
300 feet 2-year, 24-hour rainfall P2 2.5 inches P2 2.5 inches P2 2.5 inches Slope s
0.015 tuft s
0.003 tuft s
0.003 tuft Travel time2 Tt 0.50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> Tt 0.11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br /> Tt 0.11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br /> 30.0 min.
6.8 min.
6.8 min.
Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow Length L
1540 feet L
1656 feet L
1681 feet Slope s
0.01650 tuft s
0.00477 tuft s
0.00476 tuft Surface ( 1 =paved or 2=unpaved) 2 nla 2
n/a 2
nla Velocity' v
2.07 tu sec v
1.11 tu sec v
1.1 1 tu sec Travel time Tt 0.21 hours2.430556e-4 days <br />0.00583 hours <br />3.472222e-5 weeks <br />7.9905e-6 months <br /> Tt 0.41 hours4.74537e-4 days <br />0.0114 hours <br />6.779101e-5 weeks <br />1.56005e-5 months <br /> Tt 0.42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> 12.38 min.
24.77 min.
25.17 min.
Manning's Equation Flow Length L
1605 feet L
1196 feet L
0 feet Slope s
0.00460 tuft s
0.01589 tuft s
0.00000 tuft roughness*
n 0.028 nla n
0.028 n/a n
0.028 nla Open Channel Bottom Width BW 150 feet BW 3.5 feet BW 0
feet Side Slopes (tuft, H :V) Rt H:V 125 feet H:V 5.5 feet H:V 0
feet Side Slopes (tuft, H :V) Lt.
H:V 125 feet H:V 2.66 feet H:V 0
feet Depth d
0.5 feet d
1.5 feet d
0 feet Flow Rate Q
203 els Q
90 els Q
0 els Velocity v
1.91 tu sec v
6.23 tu sec v
1 tu sec Travel time Tt 0.23 hours2.662037e-4 days <br />0.00639 hours <br />3.80291e-5 weeks <br />8.7515e-6 months <br /> Tt 0.05 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> Tt 0.00 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> 14.01 min.
3.20 min.
0.00 min.
Total Travel Time T
0.94 hours0.00109 days <br />0.0261 hours <br />1.554233e-4 weeks <br />3.5767e-5 months <br /> T
0.58 hours6.712963e-4 days <br />0.0161 hours <br />9.589947e-5 weeks <br />2.2069e-5 months <br /> T
0.53 hours6.134259e-4 days <br />0.0147 hours <br />8.763227e-5 weeks <br />2.01665e-5 months <br /> T
56.34 min.
T 34.73 min.
T 31.93 min.
Lag Time {Tc*0.6)
Tlag 0.56 hours6.481481e-4 days <br />0.0156 hours <br />9.259259e-5 weeks <br />2.1308e-5 months <br /> Tlag 0.35 hours4.050926e-4 days <br />0.00972 hours <br />5.787037e-5 weeks <br />1.33175e-5 months <br /> Tlag 0.32 hours3.703704e-4 days <br />0.00889 hours <br />5.291005e-5 weeks <br />1.2176e-5 months <br /> Tlag 33.80 min.
Tlag 20.84 min.
Tlag 19.1 6 min.
Notes:
PDA4 A
679.3 (acres) 1.061 (sq mi) n 0.15 n/a L
300 feet P2 2.5 inches s
0.01400 tuft Tt 0.51 hours5.902778e-4 days <br />0.0142 hours <br />8.43254e-5 weeks <br />1.94055e-5 months <br /> 30.8 min.
L 3545 feet s
0.00555 tuft 2
n/a v
1.20 tu sec Tt 0.82 hours9.490741e-4 days <br />0.0228 hours <br />1.35582e-4 weeks <br />3.1201e-5 months <br />
- 49. 15 min.
L 0
feet s
0 00000 tuft n
0.028 n/a BW 0
feet H:V 0
feet H:V 0
feet d
0 feet Q
0 els v
1 tu sec Tt 0.00 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> 0.00 min.
T 1.33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> T
79.94 min.
Tlag 0.80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> Tlag 47.97 min.
- 1. Manning's roughness coeffi cient taken from 'Table 3-1 Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow' - United States Department of A griculture, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds TR-55, 1986
- 2. Equation 3-3, United States Department of Agriculture, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds TR-55, 1986
- 3. Figure 3-1, United States Department of Agriculture, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds TR-55, 1986
- 4. Reference Manning's 'n' calculations in APPDX C: POST-DEV ELOPMENT HYDRA ULIC CALCULATIONS S:\\Projects\\W - Z\\W CS (Waste Control Specialists)ldraft\\15052 Floodplain Analysis CISF\\Engineering\\15052 - Tc.xis APP C-3 CJi REVISION2 12 DECEMBER 2016
wcs DES AVV APPENDIXC WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS 3/8/2016 CHK DD 3/8/2016 Cii
Reference:
- 1. Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains, The U.S. Department of Transportation, 1984 Manning's Roughness Coefficient Where:
n0= a base value of n for straight, uniform, smooth channel in natural materials n1= a value added to correct for the effect of surface irregularities Channel Roughness n2= a value for variations in shape and size of the channel cross section n3= a value for obstructions n4= a value for vegetation and flow conditions m= a correction factor for meandering of the channel no=
0.020 earth Tablel ni=
0.000 smooth Table 2 n2=
0.000 gradual Table 2 n3=
0.000 neglible Table 2 n4=
0.008 low Table 2 m=
1.0 minor Table 2 n = (0.02 + 000 + 000 + 000 + 0.008)1.0
= 0.028 WCS\\FINAL\\15052\\
R161209_ HYDRAULIC CALCSManning's n APP C-4 REVISION 0 8 MARCH 2016
wcs Revised 12/09/2016 DES AVV APPENDIX C WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS 3/8/2016 DD CHK DD 3/8/2016
Reference:
- 1. Topographic aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5-29-2014. 10220 Forest Lane, Dallas, Texas 214-349-2190, 800-862-2190, Fax 214-349-2193.
- 2. Reference Drawing: S:\\CAD\\WCS\\15052 CISF Floodplain\\Engineering\\15052 - P Hydraulic Cales PMP.dwg Manning's Formula Q = vA = (1.49/n)AR 213s 112 Where:
Q=
Flow Rate (cfs) v=
velocity, (ft/s)
A=
Flow Area, (ft 2
)
n=
Manning's Roughness Coefficient R=
Hydraulic Radius, (ft) s=
Channel Slope, (ft/ft)
AP-1 Stateline Road Road Elevation at PAP 1:
3486.5 ft AMCI lOOYR Roughness Channel Left Side Right Side Bottom Peak Peak Peak Coef Slope Slope Slope Width Discharge Velocity Depth 2
(ft/ft)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft)
(CFS)
(ft/s)
(ft) n 0.028 0.0046 125 125 150 118.3 1.58 0.38 SOOYR Roughness Channel Left Side Right Side Bottom Peak Peak Peak Coef Slope Slope Slope Width Discharge Velocity Depth 2
(ft/ft)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft)
(CFS)
(ft/s)
(ft) n 0.028 0.0046 125 125 150 245.4 1.99 0.56 PMP Roughness Channel Left Side Right Side Bottom Peak Peak Peak Coef Slope Slope Slope Width Discharge Velocity Depth 2
(ft/ft)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft)
(CFS)
(ft/s)
(ft) n 0.028 0.0046 125 125 150 410.7 2.33 0.73 AMCll lOOYR Roughness Channel Left Side Right Side Bottom Peak Peak Peak Coef Slope Slope Slope Width Discharge Velocity Depth 2
(ft/ft)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft)
(CFS)
(ft/s)
(ft) n 0.028 0.0046 125 125 150 223.4 1.95 0.53 WCS\\ FINAL\\ 15052\\
R161209_HYDRAULIC CALCSStateline Road APP C-5 Cii REVISION 2 12 DECEM BER 2016
SOOYR PMP AMC Ill lOOYR SOOYR PMP Notes:
Roughness Coef 2
n 0.028 Roughness Coef 2
n 0.028 Roughness Coef 2
n 0.028 Roughness Coef 2
n 0.028 Roughness Coef 2
n 0.028 APPENDIXC WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS Channel Left Side Right Side Bottom Peak Peak Slope Slope Slope Width Discharge Velocity (ft/ft)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft)
(CFS)
(ft/s) 0.0046 125 125 150 373.1 2.24 Channel Left Side Right Side Bottom Peak Peak Slope Slope Slope Width Discharge Velocity (ft/ft)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft)
(CFS)
(ft/s) 0.0046 125 125 150 421.5 2.35 Channel Left Side Right Side Bottom Peak Peak Slope Slope Slope Width Discharge Velocity (ft/ft)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft)
(CFS)
(ft/s) 0.0046 125 125 150 292 2.12 Channel Left Side Right Side Bottom Peak Peak Slope Slope Slope Width Discharge Velocity (ft/ft)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft)
(CFS)
(ft/s) 0.0046 125 125 150 440.6 2.37 Channel Left Side Right Side Bottom Peak Peak Slope Slope Slope Width Discharge Velocity (ft/ft)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft/ft) (H:V)
(ft)
(CFS)
(ft/s) 0.0046 125 125 150 424.2 2.36
- 1. Channel geometry sources from aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5-29-2014.
Peak Depth (ft) 0.7 Peak Depth (ft) 0.74 Peak Depth (ft) 0.61 Peak Depth (ft) 0.76 Peak Depth (ft) 0.74
- 2. See Manning's Roughness Coefficient calculation. Manning's n from Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains, The U.S. Department of Transportation, 1984
- 3. Peak velocity and depth calculated using AutoCAD Civil 3D Hydraflow Express 2014.
WCS\\FINAL\\15052\\
R161209_HYDRAULIC CALCSStateline Road APP C-6 Cii REVISION 2 12 DECEM BER 2016
wcs DES AVV Elevation-Storage-Discharge APPENDIXC WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT ELEVATION-STORAGE TABLES 2/1/2016 CHK DD 2/4/2016
Reference:
- 1. 2008 URS As-Built Rail Drawings - R/T Infrastructure Improvements Facilities G.E. Hudson River Project Andrews County, Texas Project No. 29600 Cii
- 2. Topographic aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5-29-2014. 10220 Forest Lane, Dallas,
- 4. Reference Drawing: S:\\CAD\\WCS\\15052 CISF Floodplain\\Engineering\\15052 - Elevation-Storage Calcs.dwg.dwg P DA2 Elevation 1
Storage Storage ft cu yd ac-ft 3465 0
0.0000 3468 77 0.0474 3470 295 0.1829 3472 966 0.5987 3474 2112 1.3090 3476 4106 2.5450 3478 7221 4.4756 3480 11613 7.1979 3482 17893 11.0903 3484 27141 16.8228 3486 42007 26.0373 3488 69708 43.2069 3490 124344 77.0723 Notes:
- 1. Topographic elevations reference aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5-29-2014.
WCS\\FINAL \\15052\\
R161208 ELEV STORAG E\\ DA 2 APP C-7 REVISION 0 23FEBRUARY 2016
wcs DES AVV Elevation-Storage-Discharge APPENDIXC WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT ELEVATION-STORAGE TABLES 2/1/2016 CHK DD 2/4/2016 Cii
Reference:
- 1. 2008 URS As-Built Rail Drawings - R/T Infrastructure Improvements Facilities G.E. Hudson River Project Andrews County, Texas Project No. 29600
- 2. Topographic aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5-29-2014. 10220 Forest Lane, Dallas,
- 4. Reference Drawing: S:\\CAD\\WCS\\15052 CISF Floodplain\\Engineering\\15052 - Elevation-Storage Calcs.dwg.dwg P DA3 Elevation 1
Storage Storage ft cu yd ac-ft 3484 0
0.0000 3486 12111 7.5068 3488 43926 27.2267 3490 103970 64.4437 Notes:
- 1. Topographic elevations reference aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5-29-2014.
WCS\\FINAL \\ 15052\\
R161208 ELEV STORAG E\\ DA 3 APP C-8 REVISION 0 23 FEBRUARY 2016
APPENDIXC WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT ELEVATION-STORAGE TABLES wcs DES AVV 2/1/2016 CHK DD 2/4/2016 Revised 12/08/16 DD Elevation-Storage-Discharge Cii
Reference:
- 1. 2008 URS As-Built Rail Drawings - R/T Infrastructure Improvements Facilities G.E. Hudson River Project Andrews County, Texas Project No. 29600
- 2. Topographic aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5-29-2014. 10220 Forest Lane, Dallas,
- 4. Reference Drawing: S:\\CAD\\WCS\\15052 CISF Floodplain\\Design\\Surfaces\\15052 - EX TOPO & PROP.dwg Play a Elevation 1
Storage Storage ft cu yd ac-ft 3476.65 0
0 3478 3559 2.2060 3480 34133 21.1567 3482 84014 52.0744 3484 172618 106.9938 3486 476370 295.2684 3487 762062 472.3489 3488 1104022 684.3060 3489 1514069 938.4654 3490 1963987 1217.3381 Notes:
- 1. Topographic elevations reference aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5-29-2014.
WCS\\FINAL \\ 15052\\
R161208 ELEV STORAG E\\ DA 4 APP C-9 REVISION 2 12 DECEMBER 2016
APPENDIX C WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT NON-LEVEL DAM TOP CROSS SECTIONS wcs Cross Sections
Reference:
DES AVV 3/8/2016 CHK DD
- 2. 2008 URS As-Built Rail Drawings - R/T Infrastructure Improvements Facilities G.E.
Hudson River Project Andrews County, Texas Project No. 29600 Non-Level Dam - P DA 2 Rail XS Station Slope Station Station Elevation Ahead
- 11 p-ra1 1863.4 0.00 3489.35 0.37%
- 11 p-ra1 1463.4 400.00 3487.87 1.50%
- 11 p-ra1 700.0 1163.36 3476.42 1.63%
- 11 p-ra1 0.0 1863.36 3465.02 0.19%
ex-rail 2 3000.0 2243.36 3470.72 1.50%
ex-rail 2 3600.0 2843.36 3479.72 0.98%
ex-rail 2 4400.0 3643.36 3487.52 0.30%
ex-rail 2 4800.0 4043.36 3488.72 NOTES:
- 2. Existing rail stations reference 2008 URS rail as-built drawings - R/T Infrastructure Improvements Facilities G.E. Hudson River Project Andrews County, Texas Project No. 29600 and are approximate WCS\\FINAL\\ 150521 R1 60308_CROSS SECTIONS\\P DA 2 OVERTOP APP C-10 Cii REVISION 0 8 MARCH 2016
APPENDIXC WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT NON-LEVEL DAM TOP CROSS SECTIONS DES CHK wcs AVV 3/8/2016 DD 3/8/2016 Cross Sections
Reference:
Elevation Ahead p-rail 5477.49 3489.00
-0.16%
p-rail 5489.81 3488.98
-0.13%
p-rail 5689.81 3488.72
-0.13%
p-rail 5889.81 3488.46
-0.13%
p-rail 6089.81 3488.20
-0.12%
p-rail 6262.89 3488.00 0.22%
p-rail 6632.18 3488.80 0.06%
p-rail 7407.91 3489.23 NOTES:
R160308_CROSS SECTIONS\\P DA 3 OVERTOP APP C-11 Cii REVISION 0 8 MARCH 2016
wcs APPENDIXC WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT NON-LEVEL DAM TOP CROSS SECTIONS DES A VV 3/8/2016 CHK DD 3/8/2016 Cii Cross Sections
Reference:
- 1. 2008 URS As-Built Rail Drawings - R/T Infrastructure Improvements Facilities G.E. Hudson River Project Andrews County, Texas Project No. 29600
- 2. Topographic aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5-29-2014. 10220 Forest Lane, Dallas, Texas 214-349-2190, 800-862-2190, Fax 214-349-2193.
- 3. Reference Drawing: S:\\CAD\\WCS\\15052 CISF Floodplain\\Engineering\\15052 - P Hydraulic Cales PMP.dwg Non-Level Dam - P DA 4 Rail XS Station Slope Station Station Elevation Ahead ex-rail 1
8500.00 8500.00 3489.96
-0.12%
ex-rail 1
9900.00 9900.00 3488.28
-0.15%
ex-rail 1 10017.67 10017.67 3488.10
-0.20%
ex-rail 1 10387.00 10387.00 3487.36
-8.00%
topo 2
10404.00 3486.00 5.58%
to po 2
10439.87 3488.00 0.00%
topo 2
10742.10 3488.00 0.65%
to po 2
11051.85 3490.00 NOTES:
- 1. Existing rail stations reference 2008 URS rail as-built drawings - R/T Infrastructure Improvements Facilities G.E.
Hudson River Project Andrews County, Texas Project No. 29600 and are approximate
- 2. Topographic elevations come from the topographic aerial survey provided by Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc., flown 5 2014.
WCS\\FINAL\\15052\\
R160308_CROSS SECTI ONS\\P DA 4 OVERTOP APP C-12 REVISION 0 8 MARCH 2016
wcs DES AVV APPENDIXC WCS - CISF FLOOD ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT PAD OVERLAND DEPTH OF FLOW 3/8/2016 3/8/2016 Revised 11/11/16 Clarifications CHK DD DD
Reference:
1 Reference Drawing: Figure 1.1.2-1
- 2. Fundamentals of Hydraluic Engineering Systems, Ned H.C. Hwang, 1982 Manning Equation Max flow WCS\\ FINAL \\ 15052.01\\
R161212_Sheet Flow of Pads
- Where, And
- Where, v= velocity (ft/s) n= Manning's n Rh= hydraulic radius s= slope (ft/ft) q= v*y q= unit discharge (ft2/s) y= depth For sheet flow and a wide rectangular channel:
Therefore And
- Where, Where, Rh~ y Reference 2, page 182 q= (1.49/n*y2/3*s1/2)(y)
= 1.49/n*l13*s112 y= (q/(1.49/n*s1/2))3/s v= q/y q= unit discharge (ft2/s) v= velocity (ft/s) n= Manning's n y= depth s= slope (ft/ft) qMax= maximum unit discharge (ft2/s)
I= maximum rainfaill Intensity L= Length of Pad APP C-13 Cii REVISION 2 12 DECEMBER 2016
Max depth Max velocity Inputs Calculation WCS\\ FINAL \\ 15052.01\\
R161212_Sheet Flow of Pads
- Where, Where, Ymax= (qmaxf(1.49/n*s 112
))
315 Ymax= Maximum depth of flow (ft) qMax= Maximum unit discharge n= Manning's n s= slope (ft/ft) qMax= maximum unit discharge (ft 2/s)
Ymax= Maximum depth of flow (ft) s=
0.0075 ft/ft L=
515 ft phase slope length of phase Cii I=
0.210 in/min Max 500 yr-24hr rainfall intensity (HEC-HMS 500 yr SCS Storm) 2.92E-04 ft/s n=
0.015 qMax= l*L qMax=
1.50E-01 ft 2/s Ymax = 0.088154 ft
= 1.1 in ft/s manning's n for concrete APP C-14 REVISION 2 12 DECEMBER 2016
WCS\\FINAL I 150521 R161212_CISF REPORT APPENDIX D HEC-HMS OUTPUT Cii REVISION 2 12 DECEMBER 2016
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 1 AMC I End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:04:16 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storr Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Dischar~ IT"ime of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA 1 0.158 118.3 01 Jan2016, 12:29 2.09 APP D-1
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 1 AMC I End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model: 500 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:25:57 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA 1 0.158 245.4 01Jan2016, 12:27 4.11 APP D-2
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 1 AMC I End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:38:57 Meteorologic Model: PMP Distribution A Control Specifications:Control PMP Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA 1 0.158 410.7 03Jan2016, 06:00 33.97 APP D-3
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 1 AMC II End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:08:25 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storr Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Dischar~ IT"ime of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA 1 0.158 223.4 01 Jan2016, 12:26 3.68 APP D-4
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 1 AMC II End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model: 500 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:34:17 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA 1 0.158 373.1 01Jan2016, 12:26 6.17 APP D-5
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 1 AMC II End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:40:20 Meteorologic Model: PMP Distribution A Control Specifications:Control PMP Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA 1 0.158 421.5 03Jan2016, 06:00 37.48 APP D-6
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 1 AMC Ill End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:11 :24 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA 1 0.158 292.0 01Jan2016, 12:25 4.96 APP D-7
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 1 AMC Ill End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model: 500 yr Compute Time:09Dec2016, 11:10:06 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA 1 0.158 440.6 01Jan2016, 12:25 7.63 APP D-8
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 1 AMC Ill End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:41 :24 Meteorologic Model: PMP Distribution A Control Specifications:Control PMP Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA 1 0.158 424.2 03Jan2016, 06:00 39.34 APP D-9
Project:
15052 - CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 2 AMC I End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 08Mar2016, 14:18:56 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA2 0.072 118.1 01Jan2016, 12:14 3.09 P DA 2 STORAGE 0.072 118.6 01Jan2016, 12:14 3.08 APP D-10
Project:
15052 - CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 2 AMC I End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model: 500 yr Compute Time: 08Mar2016, 14:21 :22 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA2 0.072 209.2 01Jan2016, 12:13 5.44 P DA 2 STORAGE 0.072 209.9 01Jan2016, 12:13 5.42 APP D-11
Project:
15052 - CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 2 AMC I End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Compute Time: 08Mar2016, 14:21 :46 Meteorologic Model: PMP Distribution A Control Specifications:Control PMP Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA2 0.072 191.1 03Jan2016, 06:00 36.38 P DA 2 STORAGE 0.072 191.1 03Jan2016, 06:00 36.37 APP D-12
Project:
15052 - CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 2 AMC II End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 08Mar2016, 14:22:36 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA2 0.072 170.8 01Jan2016, 12:13 4.52 P DA 2 STORAGE 0.072 170.9 01Jan2016, 12:13 4.50 APP D-13
Project:
15052 - CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 2 AMC II End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model: 500 yr Compute Time: 08Mar2016, 14:23:04 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA2 0.072 264.8 01Jan2016, 12:13 7.14 P DA 2 STORAGE 0.072 265.3 01Jan2016, 12:13 7.11 APP D-14
Project:
15052 - CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 2 AMC II End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Compute Time: 08Mar2016, 14:23:26 Meteorologic Model: PMP Distribution A Control Specifications:Control PMP Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA2 0.072 193.1 03Jan2016, 06:00 38.76 P DA 2 STORAGE 0.072 193.1 03Jan2016, 06:00 38.75 APP D-15
Project:
15052 - CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 2 AMC Ill End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 08Mar2016, 14:24:13 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA2 0.072 193.2 01Jan2016, 12:12 5.41 P DA 2 STORAGE 0.072 194.1 01Jan2016, 12:12 5.40 APP D-16
Project:
15052 - CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 2 AMC Ill End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model: 500 yr Compute Time: 08Mar2016, 14:24:59 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA2 0.072 284.4 01Jan2016, 12:12 8.11 P DA 2 STORAGE 0.072 284.6 01Jan2016, 12:13 8.08 APP D-17
Project:
15052 - CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 2 AMC Ill End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Compute Time: 08Mar2016, 14:25:18 Meteorologic Model: PMP Distribution A Control Specifications:Control PMP Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA2 0.072 193.5 03Jan2016, 06:00 39.88 P DA 2 STORAGE 0.072 193.5 03Jan2016, 05:59 39.86 APP D-18
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC I End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:44:51 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA3 0.067 127.5 01Jan2016, 12:12 3.38 P DA4 1.061 803.6 01Jan2016, 12:43 2.62 P DA 3 STORAGE 0.067 0.0 01Jan2016, 00:00 0.00 PLAY A 1.128 0.0 01Jan2016, 00:00 0.00 APP D-19
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC I End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model: 500 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :27:08 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA3 0.067 218.2 01Jan2016, 12:11 5.81 P DA4 1.061 1523.1 01Jan2016, 12:42 4.84 P DA 3 STORAGE 0.067 0.0 01Jan2016, 00:00 0.00 PLAY A 1.128 0.0 01Jan2016, 00:00 0.00 APP D-20
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC I End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :35:24 Meteorologic Model: PMP Distribution A Control Specifications:Control PMP Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA3 0.067 178.4 03Jan2016, 06:00 36.94 P DA4 1.061 2786.9 03Jan2016, 06:01 35.35 P DA 3 STORAGE 0.067 178.3 03Jan2016, 06:01 29.18 PLAY A 1.128 2874.6 03Jan2016, 06:19 26.75 APP D-21
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC II End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 10:48:24 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA3 0.067 173.8 01Jan2016, 12:11 4.74 P DA4 1.061 1324.0 01Jan2016, 12:41 4.20 P DA 3 STORAGE 0.067 0.0 01Jan2016, 00:00 0.00 PLAY A 1.128 0.0 01Jan2016, 00:00 0.00 APP D-22
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC II End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model: 500 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :30:31 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA3 0.067 265.4 01Jan2016, 12:11 7.38 P DA4 1.061 2113.8 01Jan2016, 12:40 6.78 P DA 3 STORAGE 0.067 0.0 01Jan2016, 00:00 0.00 PLAY A 1.128 4.6 02Jan2016, 01 :53 0.09 APP D-23
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC II End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :41 :03 Meteorologic Model: PMP Distribution A Control Specifications:Control PMP Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA3 0.067 179.8 03Jan2016, 06:00 39.05 P DA4 1.061 2839.4 03Jan2016, 06:00 38.30 P DA 3 STORAGE 0.067 179.8 03Jan2016, 06:00 31.29 PLAY A 1.128 2980.6 03Jan2016, 06:13 29.65 APP D-24
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 3 AMC Ill End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :21 :27 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA3 0.067 191.1 01Jan2016, 12:11 5.53 P DA4 1.061 1574.7 01Jan2016, 12:40 5.18 P DA 3 STORAGE 0.067 0.0 01Jan2016, 00:00 0.00 PLAY A 1.128 0.0 01Jan2016, 00:00 0.00 APP D-25
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 3 AMC Ill End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model: 500 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :32:30 Control Specifications:Control 24 HR Storms Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA3 0.067 279.9 01Jan2016, 12:11 8.23 P DA4 1.061 2346.9 01Jan2016, 12:40 7.87 P DA 3 STORAGE 0.067 2.7 02Jan2016, 00:18 0.41 PLAY A 1.128 16.0 02Jan2016, 01 :22 0.35 APP D-26
Project:
15052-CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP 3 AMC Ill End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :37:50 Meteorologic Model: PMP Distribution A Control Specifications:Control PMP Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume Element (Ml2)
(CFS)
(IN)
P DA3 0.067 180.1 03Jan2016, 06:00 40.00 P DA4 1.061 2849.7 03Jan2016, 06:00 39.61 P DA 3 STORAGE 0.067 180.0 03Jan2016, 05:58 32.24 PLAY A 1.128 3004.8 03Jan2016, 06:11 30.94 APP D-27
Project: 15052-CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Reservoir: PLAYA Start of Run:
01Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC I End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12:00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :16:19 Control Specifications: Control 24 HR Storms Volume Units:IN Computed Results Peak Inflow:
803.6 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Inflow:
01 Jan2016, 12:43 Peak Discharge:
0.0 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Discharge: 01Jan2016, 00:00 Inflow Volume:
2.47 (IN)
Peak Storage:
148.30 (AC-FT)
Discharge Volume: 0.00 (IN)
Peak Elevation:
3484.4 (FT)
APP D-28
Project: 15052-CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Reservoir: PLAYA Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00 :00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC I End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12 :00 Meteorologic Model:
500 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :27:08 Control Specifications: Control 24 HR Storms Volume Units:IN Computed Results Peak Inflow:
1523.1 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Inflow:
01Jan2016, 12:42 Peak Discharge:
0.0 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Discharge: 01Jan2016, 00:00 Inflow Volume:
4.55 (IN)
Peak Storage:
273.77 (AC-FT)
Discharge Volume: 0.00 (IN)
Peak Elevation:
3485.8 (FT)
APP D-29
Project: 15052-CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Reservoir: PLAYA Start of Run:
01Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC I End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Meteorologic Model:
PMP Distribution A Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :35:24 Control Specifications: Control PMP Volume Units:IN Computed Results Peak Inflow:
2965.2 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Inflow:
03Jan2016, 06:01 Peak Discharge:
2874.6 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Discharge: 03Jan2016, 06:19 Inflow Volume:
34.99 (IN)
Peak Storage:
894.74 (AC-FT)
Discharge Volume: 26.75 (IN)
Peak Elevation:
3488.8 (FT)
APP D-30
Project: 15052-CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Reservoir: PLAYA Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00 :00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC II End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12 :00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :19:04 Control Specifications: Control 24 HR Storms Volume Units:IN Computed Results Peak Inflow:
1324.0 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Inflow:
01Jan2016, 12:41 Peak Discharge:
0.0 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Discharge: 01Jan2016, 00:00 Inflow Volume:
3.95 (IN)
Peak Storage:
237.47 (AC-FT)
Discharge Volume: 0.00 (IN)
Peak Elevation:
3485.4 (FT)
APP D-31
Project: 15052-CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Reservoir: PLAYA Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00 :00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC II End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12 :00 Meteorologic Model:
500 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :30:31 Control Specifications: Control 24 HR Storms Volume Units:IN Computed Results Peak Inflow:
2113.8 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Inflow:
01Jan2016, 12:40 Peak Discharge:
4.6 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Discharge: 02Jan2016, 01 :53 Inflow Volume:
6.38 (IN)
Peak Storage:
381.51 (AC-FT)
Discharge Volume: 0.09 (IN)
Peak Elevation:
3486.5 (FT)
APP D-32
Project: 15052-CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Reservoir: PLAYA Start of Run:
01Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
P AP3 AMC II End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Meteorologic Model:
PMP Distribution A Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :41 :03 Control Specifications: Control PMP Volume Units:IN Computed Results Peak Inflow:
3019.2 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Inflow:
03Jan2016, 06:00 Peak Discharge:
2980.6 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Discharge: 03Jan2016, 06:13 Inflow Volume:
37.88 (IN)
Peak Storage:
900.69 (AC-FT)
Discharge Volume: 29.65 (IN)
Peak Elevation:
3488.9 (FT)
APP D-33
Project: 15052-CISF Simulation Run: 100 YR 24 HR Reservoir: PLAYA Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00 :00 Basin Model:
PAP3AMClll End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12 :00 Meteorologic Model:
100 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :21 :27 Control Specifications: Control 24 HR Storms Volume Units:IN Computed Results Peak Inflow:
157 4. 7 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Inflow:
01Jan2016, 12:40 Peak Discharge:
0.0 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Discharge: 01Jan2016, 00:00 Inflow Volume:
4.87 (IN)
Peak Storage:
293.26 (AC-FT)
Discharge Volume: 0.00 (IN)
Peak Elevation:
3486.0 (FT)
APP D-34
Project: 15052-CISF Simulation Run: 500 YR 24 HR Reservoir: PLAYA Start of Run:
01 Jan2016, 00 :00 Basin Model:
PAP3AMClll End of Run:
02Jan2016, 12 :00 Meteorologic Model:
500 yr Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :32:30 Control Specifications: Control 24 HR Storms Volume Units:IN Computed Results Peak Inflow:
2346.9 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Inflow:
01Jan2016, 12:40 Peak Discharge:
16.0 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Discharge: 02Jan2016, 01 :22 Inflow Volume:
7.42 (IN)
Peak Storage:
436.95 (AC-FT)
Discharge Volume: 0.35 (IN)
Peak Elevation:
3486.8 (FT)
APP D-35
Project: 15052-CISF Simulation Run: PMP Dist A Reservoir: PLAYA Start of Run:
01Jan2016, 00:00 Basin Model:
PAP3AMClll End of Run:
05Jan2016, 00:00 Meteorologic Model:
PMP Distribution A Compute Time: 09Dec2016, 11 :37:50 Control Specifications: Control PMP Volume Units:IN Computed Results Peak Inflow:
3029.7 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Inflow:
03Jan2016, 06:00 Peak Discharge:
3004.8 (CFS)
Date/Time of Peak Discharge: 03Jan2016, 06:11 Inflow Volume:
39.17 (IN)
Peak Storage:
902.03 (AC-FT)
Discharge Volume: 30.94 (IN)
Peak Elevation:
3488.9 (FT)
APP D-36
WCS\\FINAL I 150521 R161212_CISF REPORT APPENDIX E HEC-HMS INPUT (CD)
Cii REVISION 2 12 DECEMBER 2016